The role of the C-terminal helix of U1A protein in the interaction with U1hpII RNA

Previous kinetic investigations of the N-terminal RNA Recognition Motif (RRM) domain of spliceosomal A protein of the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle (U1A) interacting with its RNA target U1 hairpin II (U1hpII) provided experimental evidence for a ‘lure and lock’ model of binding. The final step of locking has been proposed to involve conformational changes in an α-helix immediately C-terminal to the RRM domain (helix C), which occludes the RNA binding surface in the unbound protein. Helix C must shift its position to accommodate RNA binding in the RNA–protein complex. This results in a new hydrophobic core, an intraprotein hydrogen bond and a quadruple stacking interaction between U1A and U1hpII. Here, we used a surface plasmon resonance-based biosensor to gain mechanistic insight into the role of helix C in mediating the interaction with U1hpII. Truncation, removal or disruption of the helix exposes the RNA-binding surface, resulting in an increase in the association rate, while simultaneously reducing the ability of the complex to lock, reflected in a loss of complex stability. Disruption of the quadruple stacking interaction has minor kinetic effects when compared with removal of the intraprotein hydrogen bonds. These data provide new insights into the mechanism whereby sequences C-terminal to an RRM can influence RNA binding.     

Characterisation of the effect of electrostatic interaction on the structure of Trp-cage using molecular dynamics simulation

A mutated variant of 20 amino acid miniprotein Trp-cage (TC5b), called TC5c (Asp9 replaced by Asn9), was designed to demonstrate the effect of a salt bridge. As a result of strong electrostatic interaction, the distance distribution between Asp9 and Arg16 exhibited a larger probability in the range of the salt bridge for TC5b compared to TC5c. The probability of α-helix formation for residues 3–8, as well as for residues 11–14, was high for TC5b. The salt bridge formation between Asp9 and Arg16 in TC5b was indicated by (a) a strong correlation of their distance of separation with the subtended angle with the centre and (b) a step decrease in the distance between Gly11O and Arg16H at 12 ns. Replica exchange molecular dynamics simulation at different temperatures in the range of 270–590 K indicated that the average distance between Asp9 and Arg16, end-to-end distance, root mean square deviation with respect to a reference NMR structure of TC5b did not change significantly with temperature below 370 K for TC5b and increased at higher temperatures. These values were higher for TC5c for the whole temperature range, with their rate of increase with temperature being higher below 370 K.     

The dominant interaction between peptide and urea is electrostatic in nature: a molecular dynamics simulation study

The conformational equilibrium of a blocked valine peptide in water and aqueous urea solution is studied using molecular dynamics simulations. Pair correlation functions indicate enhanced concentration of urea near the peptide. Stronger hydrogen bonding of urea-peptide compared to water-peptide is observed with preference for helical conformation. The potential of mean force, computed using umbrella sampling, shows only small differences between urea and water solvation that are difficult to quantify. The changes in solvent structure around the peptide are explained by favorable electrostatic interactions (hydrogen bonds) of urea with the peptide backbone. There is no evidence for significant changes in hydrophobic interactions in the two conformations of the peptide in urea solution. Our simulations suggest that urea denatures proteins by preferentially forming hydrogen bonds to the peptide backbone, reducing the barrier for exposing protein residues to the solvent, and reaching the unfolded state.     

Role of the helix capping in the stability of the mouse prion (180-213) segment: investigation through molecular dynamics simulations.

Molecular dynamics simulation of the 180-213 segment, forming the B and C helices in the mouse prion protein, and of three mutants, where the capping box residues or the hydrophobic staple motif residues were selectively mutated, have been carried out. The results indicate that the wild type segment is stable over all the trajectory, whilst the mutants display different degrees of destabilization. In detail mutation of Asp202 brings to a rapid unfolding of helix C likely because of the concomitant loss of a hydrogen bond and of a negative charge able to stabilize the dipole in the first turn of the helix. A lower destabilizing effect is observed upon mutation Thr199. On the other hand mutation of Phe198 and Val203, the hydrophobic staple residues, brings to an incorrect orientation of the first helix relative to the second one due to a weakening of the hydrophobic interaction. The results confirm the importance of the presence of both motifs for the structural integrity of the isolated fragment and suggest that these residues may have a main role in the structural transition observed in the inherited human prion diseases.     

The role of the prion protein membrane anchor in prion infection

Normal cellular and abnormal disease-associated forms of prion protein (PrP) contain a C-terminal glycophosphatidyl-inositol (GPI) membrane anchor. The importance of the GPI membrane anchor in prion diseases is unclear but there are data to suggest that it both is and is not required for abnormal prion protein formation and prion infection. Utilizing an in vitro model of prion infection we have recently demonstrated that, while the GPI anchor is not essential for the formation of abnormal prion protein in a cell, it is necessary for the establishment of persistent prion infection. In combination with previously published data, our results suggest that GPI anchored PrP is important in the amplification and spread of prion infectivity from cell to cell.Key words: prion, GPI anchor, PrP, prion spread, scrapieIn transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE or prion diseases) such as sheep scrapie, bovine spongiform encephalopathy and human Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, normally soluble and protease-sensitive prion protein (PrP-sen or PrP^C) is converted to an abnormal, insoluble and protease-resistant form termed PrP-res or PrP^Sc. PrP-res/PrP^Sc is believed to be the main component of the prion, the infectious agent of the TSE/prion diseases. Its precursor, PrP-sen, is anchored to the cell surface at the C-terminus by a co-translationally added glycophosphatidyl-inositol (GPI) membrane anchor which can be cleaved by the enzyme phosphatidyl-inositol specific phospholipase (PIPLC). The GPI anchor is also present in PrP-res, but is inaccessible to PIPLC digestion suggesting that conformational changes in PrP associated with PrP-res formation have blocked the PIPLC cleavage site.¹ Although the GPI anchor is present in both PrP-sen and PrP-res, its precise role in TSE diseases remains unclear primarily because there are data to suggest that it both is and is not necessary for PrP-res formation and prion infection.In tissue culture cells infected with mouse scrapie, PrP-res formation occurs at the cell surface and/or along the endocytic pathway^2–4 and may be dependent upon the membrane environment of PrP-sen. For example, localization via the GPI anchor to caveolae-like domains favors PrP-res formation⁵ while substitution of the GPI anchor addition site with carboxy termini favoring transmembrane anchored PrP-sen inhibits formation of PrP-res.^5,6 Other studies have shown that localization of both PrP-sen and PrP-res to lipid rafts, cholesterol and sphingolipid rich membrane microdomains where GPI anchored proteins can be located, is important in PrP-res formation.^6–9However, there are also data which suggest that such localization is not necessarily essential for PrP-res formation. Anchorless PrP-sen isolated from cells by immunoprecipitation or wild-type PrP-sen purified by immunoaffinity column followed by cation exchange chromatography are efficiently converted into PrP-res in cell-free systems.^10,11 Furthermore, recombinant PrP-sen derived from E. coli, which has no membrane anchor or glycosylation, can be induced to form protease-resistant PrP in vitro when reacted with prion-infected brain homogenates.^12–14 Finally, in at least one instance, protease-resistant recombinant PrP-res generated in the absence of infected brain homogenate was reported to cause disease when inoculated into transgenic mice.¹⁵The data concerning the role of the PrP-sen GPI anchor in susceptibility to TSE infection are similarly contradictory. Transgenic mice expressing anchorless mouse PrP-sen are susceptible to infection with mouse scrapie and accumulate both PrP-res and prion infectivity.¹⁶ Thus, the GPI anchor is clearly not needed for PrP-res formation or productive TSE infection in vivo. However, we recently published data demonstrating that, in vitro, anchored PrP-sen is in fact required to persistently infect cells.¹⁷ Given that anchorless PrP-sen is not present on the cell surface but is released into the cell medium, we speculated that the differences between the in vitro and in vivo data were related to the location of PrP-res formation. In the mice expressing anchorless PrP-sen, environments conducive to PrP-res formation are present in certain areas of the complex extracellular milieu of the brain where anchorless, secreted PrP-sen can accumulate and come into contact with PrP-res from the infectious inoculum. Since similar environments are missing in vitro, any PrP-res formation in cells expressing anchorless PrP-sen must be cell-associated. While this explanation addresses how extracellular PrP-res could be generated in an unusual transgenic mouse model of TSE infection, it does not really help to define how the GPI anchor is involved in normal prion infection of a cell.As with other infectious organisms such as viruses, TSE infection can be roughly divided into three steps: uptake, replication and spread. Over the last several years, data derived from new techniques as well as new cell lines susceptible to prion infection have increased our knowledge of some of the basic events that occur during each of these steps. In order to try to tease out the role of the GPI anchor in normal TSE pathogenesis, it is therefore useful to consider the process of TSE infection of a cell and how the GPI anchor might be involved in each stage.In a conventional viral infection, binding and uptake of the virus is essential to establish infection. Studying PrP-res uptake has been complicated by the lack of an antibody that can specifically distinguish PrP-res from PrP-sen in live cells and by the difficulty of detecting the input PrP-res from the PrP-res made de novo by the cell. Recently, however, several groups have been able to study PrP-res uptake using input PrP-res that was either fluorescently labeled^18–20 or tagged with the epitope to the monoclonal antibody 3F4,²¹ or cell lines that express little or no PrP-sen.^19,21–23 The data show that PrP-res uptake is independent of scrapie strain or cell type but is influenced by the PrP-res microenvironment as well as PrP-res aggregate size.²¹ Importantly, these studies demonstrated that PrP-sen expression was not required.^19,21–23 Given these data, it is clear that GPI anchored PrP-sen is not involved in the initial uptake of PrP-res into the cell.The next stage of prion infection involves replication of infectivity which is typically assayed by following cellular PrP-res formation. Once again, however, the issue of how to distinguish PrP-res in the inoculum from newly formed PrP-res in the cells has made it difficult to study the early stages of prion replication. To overcome this difficulty, we developed a murine tissue culture system that utilizes cells expressing mouse PrP-sen tagged with the epitope to the 3F4 antibody (Mo3F4 PrP-sen).²⁴ Wild-type mouse PrP does not have this epitope. As a result, following exposure to an infected mouse brain homogenate, de novo PrP-res formation can be followed by assaying for 3F4 positive PrP-res. Our studies showed that there were two stages of PrP-res formation: (1) an initial acute burst within the first 96 hours post-infection that was cell-type and scrapie strain independent and, (2) persistent PrP-res formation (i.e., formation of PrP-res over multiple cell passages) that was dependent on cell-type and scrapie strain and associated with long-term infection.²⁴ Acute PrP-res formation did not necessarily lead to persistent PrP-res formation suggesting that other cell-specific factors or processes are needed for PrP-res formation to persist.²⁴When cells expressing Mo3F4 PrP-sen without the GPI anchor (Mo3F4 GPI-PrP-sen) were exposed to mouse scrapie infected brain homogenates, GPI negative, 3F4 positive PrP-res (Mo3F4 GPI-PrP-res) was detected within 96 hours indicating that acute PrP-res formation had occurred.¹⁷ Thus, despite the fact that Mo3F4 GPI-PrP-sen is not expressed on the cell surface¹⁶ (Fig. 1A), it was still available for conversion to PrP-res. These results are consistent with data from cell-free systems and demonstrate that, at least acutely, membrane anchored PrP is not necessary for PrP-res formation in a cell.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Persistent infection of cells in vitro requires the expression of GPI-anchored cell surface PrP-sen. PrP knockout cells (CF10)²¹ were transduced with 3F4 epitope tagged mouse PrP-sen (Mo3F4), 3F4 epitope tagged mouse PrP-sen without the GPI anchor (Mo3F4 GPI-), or Mo3F4 GPI-PrP-sen plus wild-type, GPI anchored mouse PrP-sen (MoPrP). The cells were then exposed to the mouse scrapie strain 22L and passaged. (A) The presence of 3F4 epitope tagged, cell surface mouse PrP-sen was assayed by FACS analysis of fixed, non-permeabilized cells. CF10 cells expressing the following mouse PrP-sen molecules were assayed: Mo3F4 (solid line); Mo3F4 GPI⁻ (dashed line); Mo3F4 GPI⁻ + MoPrP (dotted and dashed line); Mo3F4 GPI⁻ + MoPrP infected with 22L scrapie (dotted line). Only cells expressing Mo3F4 PrP-sen were positive for cell surface, 3F4 epitope tagged PrP. (B) Persistent infection was analyzed by inoculating the cells intracranially into transgenic mice overexpressing MoPrP (Tga20 mice). Only cells expressing anchored mouse PrP-sen were susceptible to scrapie infection. Cells expressing anchorless mouse PrP-sen did not contain detectable infectivity in either the cells or the cellular supernatant (data not shown). Data in (B) are adapted from McNally 2009.¹⁷In terms of persistent PrP-res formation, however, our data suggest that the GPI anchor is important. Despite an initial burst of PrP-res formation within the first 96 hours post-infection, Mo3F4 GPI-PrP-res was not observed following passage of the cells nor did the cells become infected. This effect was not due either to resistance of the cells to scrapie infection or to an inability of the scrapie strain used to infect cells. When the same cells expressed anchored Mo3F4 PrP-sen and were exposed to the same mouse scrapie strain, both acute and persistent PrP-res formation were detected and the cells were persistently infected with scrapie (Fig. 1B).¹⁷ Taken together, these data demonstrate that cells expressing anchorless PrP-sen do not support persistent PrP-res formation. Furthermore, the data strongly suggest that GPI-anchored PrP-sen is required during the transition from acute to persistent scrapie infection. In support of this hypothesis, the resistance of cells expressing Mo3F4 GPI-PrP-sen to persistent prion infection could be overcome if wild-type GPI anchored PrP-sen was co-expressed in the same cell. When both forms of PrP-sen were expressed, anchored and anchorless forms of PrP-res were made and the cells became persistently infected (Fig. 1B).¹⁷ Thus, the data suggest that GPI anchored PrP is necessary to establish prion infection within a cell.How could GPI membrane anchored PrP be involved in the establishment and maintenance of persistent prion infection? Several studies have suggested that the GPI anchor is needed to localize PrP-sen to specific membrane environments where PrP-res formation is favored.^5–8 However, if this localization was essential for PrP-res formation, GPI-PrP-sen would presumably never form PrP-res. Lacking the GPI anchor, it would not be in the correct membrane environment to support conversion. As a result, neither acute nor persistent prion infection could occur. This is obviously not the case. Transgenic mice expressing only anchorless PrP-sen generate PrP-res and can be infected with scrapie even though (1) flotation gradients showed that anchorless PrP-sen was not in the same membrane environment as anchored PrP-sen and, (2) flow cytometry analysis demonstrated that anchorless PrP-sen was not present on the cell surface.¹⁶ Thus, the GPI anchor is not needed to target PrP-sen to a conversion friendly membrane environment.Consistent with the idea that the GPI anchor is not essential for PrP-res formation, in our studies anchorless PrP-sen could form PrP-res in cells acutely infected with scrapie despite the fact that it is processed differently than anchored PrP-sen, is not present on the cell surface (Fig. 1A), and is secreted.¹⁷ Persistent formation of anchorless PrP-res only occurred when both anchored and anchorless forms of PrP were expressed in the same cell.¹⁷ For this to happen both types of PrP must share a cellular compartment where PrP-res formation occurs, presumably either on the cell surface or in a specific location along the endocytic pathway^2,3 such as the endosomal recycling compartment.⁴ Analysis of infected and uninfected cells co-expressing Mo3F4 GPI-PrP-sen and wild-type PrP-sen demonstrated that Mo3F4 GPI-PrP-sen was not present on the cell surface (Fig. 1A). Thus, it is unlikely that GPI-PrP-res formation is occurring on the cell surface. We speculate that the anchored form of PrP-res encounters anchorless PrP-sen along either a secretory or endocytic pathway, allowing for the formation of anchorless PrP-res. Regardless of the precise location, the in vitro and in vivo data strongly suggest that the role of the anchor in persistent prion infection is not simply to localize PrP-sen to an environment compatible with PrP-res formation.However, the data are consistent with the idea that GPI anchored PrP is absolutely essential for the establishment of persistent infection in vitro. This is likely related to the spread of infectivity within a culture that is necessary for maintaining a persistent infection over time. Evidence suggests that PrP-res can be transferred between cells in a variety of ways including mother-daughter cell division,²⁵ cell-to-cell contact^26,27 and exosomes.²⁸ Tunneling nanotubes have also been hypothesized to be involved in intercellular prion spread¹⁹ and recent data suggest that spread can occur via these structures.²⁰ Any of these processes could involve the cell-to-cell transfer of PrP-res in membrane containing particles as has been observed in cell-free⁷ and cell-based systems.²⁹ If cell-to-cell contact were required, for example via simple physical proximity or perhaps tunneling nanotubes,^19,20 then the conversion of cell surface PrP-sen on the naïve cell by cell surface PrP-res on the infected cell would transfer infection to the naïve cell. In this instance, GPI membrane anchored, cell surface PrP-sen would be essential as it would allow for PrP-res formation on the cell surface. If spread is via cell division, then GPI-anchored, cell surface PrP-sen would be important for its role as a precursor to PrP-res formation.² In this instance, cell surface PrP-sen would be an essential intermediate in the continuous formation of PrP-res necessary for the accumulation and amplification of PrP-res within the cell. It would also help to cycle PrP between the cell surface and intracellular compartments where PrP-res can be formed.⁴ In either case, GPI-anchored PrP-sen would facilitate the accumulation of intracellular PrP-res to high enough levels to maintain both persistent infection in the mother cell and enable the transfer of organelles containing sufficient PrP-res to initiate infection in the daughter cell. Thus, we would suggest that efficient spread of infectivity requires not just the passive transfer of PrP-res from cell-to-cell but the concurrent initiation of conversion and amplification of PrP-res via cell surface, GPI anchored PrP-sen.In vivo, several lines of evidence suggest that the spread of scrapie infectivity also requires de novo PrP-res formation in the recipient cell and not simply transfer of PrP-res from one cell to another. For example, when neurografts from PrP expressing mice were placed in the brains of PrP knockout mice and the mice were challenged intracranially with scrapie, the graft showed scrapie pathology, but the surrounding tissue did not.³⁰ Furthermore, PrP-res from the graft migrated to the host tissue demonstrating that simple transfer of PrP-res was not sufficient and that PrP-sen expression was required for the spread of scrapie pathology.³⁰ In fact, these mice did not develop scrapie pathology following peripheral infection even when peripheral lymphoid tissues were reconstituted with PrP-sen expressing cells.³¹ Even though PrP-sen expressing cells were present in both the brain and spleen, in order for infectivity to spread from the lymphoreticular system to the central nervous system PrP-sen expression was also required in an intermediate tissue such as peripheral nerve.^31,32 Given that PrP-res uptake and trafficking do not require PrP-sen, the most obvious explanation for the requirement of PrP-sen in contiguous tissues is that de novo PrP-res formation in naïve cells is necessary for (1) infectivity to move from cell to cell within a tissue and, (2) infectivity to move from tissue to tissue.Another study demonstrated that peripheral expression of heterologous mouse PrP significantly increased the incubation time and actually prevented clinical disease in the majority of transgenic mice expressing hamster PrP in neurons of the brain.³³ Once again, if simple transfer and uptake of PrP-res were sufficient for spread, the presence of heterologous PrP molecules should not interfere because cellular uptake of PrP-res is independent of PrP-sen expression.^19,21–23 Clinical disease in these mice was likely prevented by the heterologous PrP molecule interfering with conversion of PrP-sen to PrP-res suggesting that prevention of de novo PrP-res formation inhibits spread of PrP-res and infectivity. These in vivo data, when combined with our recent in vitro data,¹⁷ provide evidence to support the importance of cell surface, and by extension GPI-anchored, PrP in the spread of prion infection.Our data demonstrate that the GPI anchor plays a role in the establishment of persistent scrapie infection in vitro. In our tissue culture system,²¹ as well as others where spread of infectivity by cell to cell contact appears to be limited,^25,34 the role of GPI anchored PrP-sen would be to amplify PrP-res to enable the efficient transfer of infectivity from mother to daughter cell. In cell systems where spread of prion infectivity may require cell to cell contact,^26,27 we propose that the role of GPI anchored PrP-sen is to facilitate the spread of prion infection via a chain of conversion from cell-to-cell, a “domino” type spread of infection that has been previously hypothesized.^35,36In vivo, such a mechanism might explain why neuroinvasion does not necessarily require axonal transport^32,37,38 and can occur independently of the axonal neurofilament machinery.³⁹ It would likely vary with cell type²⁷ and be most important in areas where infectivity is transferred from the periphery to the nervous system as well as in areas where cell division may be limited. It is also possible, if the location of PrP-res formation differs for different scrapie strains,⁴⁰ that the relative importance of a domino-like spread of infectivity in vivo would vary with the scrapie strain.Of course, spread of infectivity via a “wave” of GPI anchored, PrP mediated conversion would not preclude the spread of infectivity by other intracellular means such as axonal transport (reviewed in ref. ⁴¹). Furthermore, spread of infectivity may still also occur extracellularly such as in the unique case of mice which express anchorless PrP-sen,¹⁶ where our in vitro data would suggest that the cells themselves are not infected. In such a case, spread would require neither GPI anchored PrP-sen nor amplification of PrP-res in cells but would likely occur via other means such as blood⁴¹ or interstitial fluid flow.⁴²     

Misfolding pathways of the prion protein probed by molecular dynamics simulations

Although the cellular monomeric form of the benign prion protein is now well characterized, a model for the monomer of the misfolded conformation (PrP(Sc)) remains elusive. PrP(Sc) quickly aggregates into highly insoluble fibrils making experimental structural characterization very difficult. The tendency to aggregation of PrP(Sc) in aqueous solution implies that the monomer fold must be hydrophobic. Here, by using molecular dynamics simulations, we have studied the cellular mouse prion protein and its D178N pathogenic mutant immersed in a hydrophobic environment (solution of CCl4), to reveal conformational changes and/or local structural weaknesses of the prion protein fold in unfavorable structural and thermodynamic conditions. Simulations in water have been also performed. Although observing in general a rather limited conformation activity in the nanosecond timescale, we have detected a significant weakening of the antiparallel beta-sheet of the D178N mutant in CCl4 and to a less extent in water. No weakening is observed for the native prion protein. The increase of beta-structure in the monomer, recently claimed as evidence for misfolding to PrP(Sc), has been also observed in this study irrespective of the thermodynamic or structural conditions, showing that this behavior is very likely an intrinsic characteristic of the prion protein fold.     

The role of the prion protein membrane anchor in prion infection

In transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE or prion diseases) such as sheep scrapie, bovine spongiform encephalopathy and human Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, normally soluble and protease-sensitive prion protein (PrP-sen or PrPC) is converted to an abnormal, insoluble and protease-resistant form termed PrP-res or PrPSc. PrP-res/PrPSc is believed to be the main component of the prion, the infectious agent of the TSE/prion diseases. Its precursor, PrP-sen, is anchored to the cell surface at the C-terminus by a co-translationally added glycophosphatidyl-inositol (GPI) membrane anchor which can be cleaved by the enzyme phosphatidyl-inositol specific phospholipase (PIPLC). The GPI anchor is also present in PrP-res, but is inaccessible to PIPLC digestion suggesting that conformational changes in PrP associated with PrP-res formation have blocked the PIPLC cleavage site. Although the GPI anchor is present in both PrP-sen and PrP-res, its precise role in TSE diseases remains unclear primarily because there are data to suggest that it both is and is not necessary for PrP-res formation and prion infection.     

Molecular dynamics simulations of human prion protein: importance of correct treatment of electrostatic interactions.

Molecular dynamics simulations have been used to investigate the dynamical and structural behavior of a homology model of human prion protein HuPrP(90-230) generated from the NMR structure of the Syrian hamster prion protein ShPrP(90-231) and of ShPrP(<90-231) itself. These PrPs have a large number of charged residues on the protein surface. At the simulation pH 7, HuPrP(90-230) has a net charge of -1 eu from 15 positively and 14 negatively charged residues. Simulations for both PrPs, using the AMBER94 force field in a periodic box model with explicit water molecules, showed high sensitivity to the correct treatment of the electrostatic interactions. Highly unstable behavior of the structured region of the PrPs (127-230) was found using the truncation method, and stable trajectories could be achieved only by including all the long-range electrostatic interactions using the particle mesh Ewald (PME) method. The instability using the truncation method could not be reduced by adding sodium and chloride ions nor by replacing some of the sodium ions with calcium ions. The PME simulations showed, in accordance with NMR experiments with ShPrP and mouse PrP, a flexibly disordered N-terminal part, PrP(90-126), and a structured C-terminal part, PrP(127-230), which includes three alpha-helices and a short antiparallel beta-strand. The simulations showed some tendency for the highly conserved hydrophobic segment PrP(112-131) to adopt an alpha-helical conformation and for helix C to split at residues 212-213, a known disease-associated mutation site (Q212P). Three highly occupied salt bridges could be identified (E146/D144<-->R208, R164<-->D178, and R156<-->E196) which appear to be important for the stability of PrP by linking the stable main structured core (helices B and C) with the more flexible structured part (helix A and strands A and B). Two of these salt bridges involve disease-associated mutations (R208H and D178N). Decreased PrP stability shown by protein unfolding experiments on mutants of these residues and guanidinium chloride or temperature-induced unfolding studies indicating reduced stability at low pH are consistent with stabilization by salt bridges. The fact that electrostatic interactions, in general, and salt bridges, in particular, appear to play an important role in PrP stability has implications for PrP structure and stability at different pHs it may encounter physiologically during normal or abnormal recycling from the pH neutral membrane surface into endosomes or lysomes (acidic pHs) or in NMR experiments (5.2 for ShPrP and 4.5 for mouse PrP).     

Determinants of the in vivo folding of the prion protein. A bipartite function of helix 1 in folding and aggregation

Misfolding of the mammalian prion protein (PrP) is implicated in the pathogenesis of prion diseases. We analyzed wild type PrP in comparison with different PrP mutants and identified determinants of the in vivo folding pathway of PrP. The complete N terminus of PrP including the putative transmembrane domain and the first beta-strand could be deleted without interfering with PrP maturation. Helix 1, however, turned out to be a major determinant of PrP folding. Disruption of helix 1 prevented attachment of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor and the formation of complex N-linked glycans; instead, a high mannose PrP glycoform was secreted into the cell culture supernatant. In the absence of a C-terminal membrane anchor, however, helix 1 induced the formation of unglycosylated and partially protease-resistant PrP aggregates. Moreover, we could show that the C-terminal GPI anchor signal sequence, independent of its role in GPI anchor attachment, mediates core glycosylation of nascent PrP. Interestingly, conversion of high mannose glycans to complex type glycans only occurred when PrP was membrane-anchored. Our study indicates a bipartite function of helix 1 in the maturation and aggregation of PrP and emphasizes a critical role of a membrane anchor in the formation of complex glycosylated PrP.     

Energy landscape of the prion protein helix 1 probed by metadynamics and NMR

The characterization of the structural dynamics of proteins, including those that present a substantial degree of disorder, is currently a major scientific challenge. These dynamics are biologically relevant and govern the majority of functional and pathological processes. We exploited a combination of enhanced molecular simulations of metadynamics and NMR measurements to study heterogeneous states of proteins and peptides. In this way, we determined the structural ensemble and free-energy landscape of the highly dynamic helix 1 of the prion protein (PrP-H1), whose misfolding and aggregation are intimately connected to a group of neurodegenerative disorders known as transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. Our combined approach allowed us to dissect the factors that govern the conformational states of PrP-H1 in solution, and the implications of these factors for prion protein misfolding and aggregation. The results underline the importance of adopting novel integrated approaches that take advantage of experiments and theory to achieve a comprehensive characterization of the structure and dynamics of biological macromolecules.     

The role of electrostatic interaction in the molecular recognition of selective agonists to metabotropic glutamate receptors

The influence of electrostatic interactions in determining selectivity for individual subtypes of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) is evaluated for a small set of agonists by using the program Delphi and the information thus obtained is compared with docking experiments carried out with AutoDock. The evaluation of the electrostatic component of the free energy of binding for L-Glu, L-AP4, or S-PPG to mGluR1, mGluR2, and mGluR4 subtypes allowed for the detection of subtle differences in the electronic properties of the three subtypes, differences that can account for the observed agonist selectivity.     

Cholesterol in model membranes. A molecular dynamics simulation.

Molecular dynamics simulations of a model membrane with inserted cholesterol molecules have been performed to study the perturbing influence of cholesterol. In the fluid phase of a lipid bilayer at 13 mol% concentration of cholesterol, local ordering of the hydrocarbon chains is induced. This perturbation decays with the distance from the cholesterol, and the effect extends 1.25 nm. It can be monitored in several ways, e.g., by an order parameter corresponding to deuterium nuclear magnetic resonance quadrupolar splittings, by the fraction of gauche bonds, or by the local bilayer thickness. At constant surface density, the local ordering is accompanied by disordering of the bulk phase, and, consequently, the net ordering effect is small. After compressing the system laterally in accordance with experimentally known surface areas, the bulk order parameters agree with those of a pure system, and the average order parameters are in accordance with experimental data. The necessity for this lateral compression is supported by calculated lateral pressures. At lower cholesterol concentration (3%), no direct perturbing effect is observed. A smaller lateral pressure than in a pure system indicates that the system with cholesterol is expected to have a smaller surface area, which would result in an increase of the order parameters, thus accounting for the experimental observations. The lack of spatial variation is, however, puzzling and may indicate a cooperative ordering effect.     

CD and NMR studies of prion protein (PrP) helix 1. Novel implications for its role in the PrPC-->PrPSc conversion process

The conversion of prion helix 1 from an alpha-helical into an extended conformation is generally assumed to be an essential step in the conversion of the cellular isoform PrPC of the prion protein to the pathogenic isoform PrPSc. Peptides encompassing helix 1 and flanking sequences were analyzed by nuclear magnetic resonance and circular dichroism. Our results indicate a remarkably high instrinsic helix propensity of the helix 1 region. In particular, these peptides retain significant helicity under a wide range of conditions, such as high salt, pH variation, and presence of organic co-solvents. As evidenced by a data base search, the pattern of charged residues present in helix 1 generally favors helical structures over alternative conformations. Because of its high stability against environmental changes, helix 1 is unlikely to be involved in the initial steps of the pathogenic conformational change. Our results implicate that interconversion of helix 1 is rather representing a barrier than a nucleus for the PrPC-->PrPSc conversion.     

Molecular dynamics simulation of Pf1 coat protein.

The results of molecular dynamics simulations of Pf1 coat protein are described and compared to experimental NMR data on both the membrane bound and structural forms of this viral coat protein. Molecular dynamics simulations of the 46 residue coat protein and related model sequences were performed according to a simple protocol. The simulations were initiated with the polypeptides in a completely uniform alpha helical conformation in a dielectric continuum (epsilon = 2) and the motions of individual residues were followed as a function of time by monitoring the angular fluctuations of amide NH bond vectors. The simulations of Pf1 coat protein were able to identify the same mobile and structured segments found in experimental NMR studies of the membrane bound form of the protein (Shon, K.-J., Y. Kim, L. A. Colnago, and S. J. Opella. 1991. Science (Wash. DC). 252:1303-1305). Significantly, in addition to mobile amino and carboxyl terminal regions, a mobile internal loop was found that connects the rigid hydrophobic and amphipathic helices in the protein. NMR experiments show that this mobile loop is present in both the viral and membrane bound forms of the protein and that it plays a role in viral assembly (Nambudripad, R., W. Stark, S. J. Opella, and L. Makowski. 1991. Science (Wash. DC) 252:1305-1308). The results of simulations of several alanine based 46 residue polypeptides with some of the charged residues present in the Pf1 coat protein sequence suggest that interactions between the Asp 14 and Asp 18 sidechains and the peptide backbone are responsible for the formation of the mobile loop.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Defining the transmembrane helix of M2 protein from influenza A by molecular dynamics simulations in a lipid bilayer

Integral membrane proteins containing at least one transmembrane (TM) alpha-helix are believed to account for between 20% and 30% of most genomes. There are several algorithms that accurately predict the number and position of TM helices within a membrane protein sequence. However, these methods tend to disagree over the beginning and end residues of TM helices, posing problems for subsequent modeling and simulation studies. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in an explicit lipid and water environment are used to help define the TM helix of the M2 protein from influenza A virus. Based on a comparison of the results of five different secondary structure prediction algorithms, three different helix lengths (an 18mer, a 26mer, and a 34mer) were simulated. Each simulation system contained 127 POPC molecules plus approximately 3500-4700 waters, giving a total of approximately 18,000-21,000 atoms. Two simulations, each of 2 ns duration, were run for the 18mer and 26mer, and five separate simulations were run for the 34mer, using different starting models generated by restrained in vacuo MD simulations. The total simulation time amounted to 11 ns. Analysis of the time-dependent secondary structure of the TM segments was used to define the regions that adopted a stable alpha-helical conformation throughout the simulation. This analysis indicates a core TM region of approximately 20 residues (from residue 22 to residue 43) that remained in an alpha-helical conformation. Analysis of atomic density profiles suggested that the 18mer helix revealed a local perturbation of the lipid bilayer. Polar side chains on either side of this region form relatively long-lived H-bonds to lipid headgroups and water molecules.     

Purification of normal cellular prion protein from human platelets and the formation of a high molecular weight prion protein complex following platelet activation

A method for the extraction and purification of PrP(C), in its native monomeric form, from outdated human platelet concentrates is described. Both calcium ionophore platelet activation and lysis in Triton X-100 were evaluated as methods for the extraction of soluble platelet PrP(C) in its monomeric form. Following platelet activation, the majority of released PrP(C) was detected as a disulphide linked high molecular weight complex, which under reducing conditions could be separated into what appear to be stable non-disulphide linked PrP dimers or PrP covalently linked to another as yet unidentified protein. This phenomenon appears to be unique to activation since only monomeric PrP(C) was detected following lysis of resting platelets. Subsequently, PrP(C) was purified from the Triton X-100 lysate by sequential cation ion exchange and Cu2+ affinity chromatography. From 10 L of outdated platelet concentrate, we were able to recover 1.29 mg PrP(C) at a purity of 92%.     

Molecular dynamics simulation of human prion protein including both N-linked oligosaccharides and the GPI anchor

Although glycosylation appears to protect prion protein (PrP(C)) from the conformational transition to the disease-associated scrapie form (PrP(Sc)), available NMR structures are for non-glycosylated PrP(C), only. To investigate the influence of both the two N-linked glycans, Asn181 and Asn197, and of the GPI anchor attached to Ser230, on the structural, dynamical and electrostatic behavior of PrP, we have undertaken molecular dynamics simulations on the C-terminal region of human prion protein HU:PrP(90-230), with and without the three glycans. The simulations used the AMBER94 force field in a periodic box model with explicit water molecules, considering all long-range electrostatic interactions. The results suggest the structured part of the protein, HU:PrP(127-227) is stabilized overall from addition of the glycans, specifically by extensions of Helix-B and Helix-C and reduced flexibility of the linking turn containing Asn197, although some regions such as residues in the turn (165-170) between Strand-B and Helix-B have increased flexibility. The stabilization appears indirect, by reducing the mobility of the surrounding water molecules, and not from specific interactions such as H bonds or ion pairs. The results are consistent with glycosylation at Asn197 having a stabilizing role, while that at Asn181, in a region with already stable secondary structure, having a more functional role, in agreement with literature suggestions. Due to three negatively charged SiaLe(x) groups per N-glycan, the surface electrostatic properties change to a negative electrostatic field covering most of the C-terminal part, including the surface of Helix-B and Helix-C, while the positively charged N-terminal part PrP(90-126) of undefined structure creates a positive potential. The unusual hydrophilic Helix-A (144-152) is not covered by either of these dominant electrostatic fields, and modeling shows it could readily dimerize in anti parallel fashion. In combination with separate simulations of the GPI anchor in a membrane model, the results show the GPI anchor is highly flexible and would maintain the protein at a distance between 9 and 13 A from the membrane surface, with little influence on its structure or orientational freedom.     

A molecular dynamics simulation of bacteriophage T4 lysozyme.

An analysis of a 400 ps molecular dynamics simulation of the 164 amino acid enzyme T4 lysozyme is presented. The simulation was carried out with all hydrogen atoms modeled explicitly, the inclusion of all 152 crystallographic waters and at a temperature of 300 K. Temporal analysis of the trajectory versus energy, hydrogen bond stability, r.m.s. deviation from the starting crystal structure and radius of gyration, demonstrates that the simulation was both stable and representative of the average experimental structure. Average structural properties were calculated from the enzyme trajectory and compared with the crystal structure. The mean value of the C alpha displacements of the average simulated structure from the X-ray structure was 1.1 +/- 0.1 A; differences of the backbone phi and psi angles between the average simulated structure and the crystal structure were also examined. Thermal-B factors were calculated from the simulation for heavy and backbone atoms and both were in good agreement with experimental values. Relationships between protein secondary structure elements and internal motions were studied by examining the positional fluctuations of individual helix, sheet and turn structures. The structural integrity in the secondary structure units was preserved throughout the simulation; however, the A helix did show some unusually high atomic fluctuations. The largest backbone atom r.m.s. fluctuations were found in non-secondary structure regions; similar results were observed for r.m.s. fluctuations of non-secondary structure phi and psi angles. In general, the calculated values of r.m.s. fluctuations were quite small for the secondary structure elements. In contrast, surface loops and turns exhibited much larger values, being able to sample larger regions of conformational space. The C alpha difference distance matrix and super-positioning analyses comparing the X-ray structure with the average dynamics structure suggest that a 'hinge-bending' motion occurs between the N- and C-terminal domains.     

Structural differences between allelic variants of the ovine prion protein revealed by molecular dynamics simulations

We have modeled ovine prion protein (residues 119-233) based on NMR structures of PrP from other mammalian species. Modeling of the C-terminal domain of ovine PrP predicts three helices: helix-1 (residues 147-155), flanked by two short beta-strands; helix-2 (residues 176-197), and helix-3 (residues 203-229). Molecular dynamics simulations on this model of ovine PrP have determined structural differences between allelic variants. At neutral pH, limited root mean-squared (RMS) fluctuations were seen in the region of helix-1; between beta-strand-2 and residue 171, and the loop connecting helix-2 and helix-3. At low pH, these RMS fluctuations increased and showed allelic variation. The extent of RMS fluctuation between beta-strand 2 and residue 171 was ARR > ARQ > VRQ. This order was reversed for the loop region connecting helix-2 and helix-3. Although all three variants have the potential to display an extended helix at the C-terminal region of helix-1, the major influence of the VRQ allele was to restrict the conformations of the Asn162 and Arg139 side-chains. Variations observed in the simulations in the vicinity of helix-1 correlated with reactivity of C-terminal specific anti-PrP monoclonal antibodies with peripheral blood cells from scrapie-susceptible and -resistant genotypes of sheep: cells from VRQ homozygous sheep showed uniform reactivity, while cells from ARQ and ARR homozygous sheep showed variable binding. Our data show that molecular dynamics simulations can be used to determine structural differences between allelic variants of ovine PrP. The binding of anti-PrP monoclonal antibodies to ovine blood cells may validate these structural predictions.