Is the nuclear matrix the site of DNA replication in eukaryotic cells?

Four types of experiment were carried out to test the recently proposed model of matrix-bound replication in eukaryotic cells. In experiments with pulse-labelling we found preferential association of newly replicated DNA with the matrix only when the procedure for isolation includes first high-salt treatment of isolated nuclei and then digestion with nucleases, or when prior to digestion the nuclei have been stored for a prolonged time. In both cases, however, evidence was found that this preferential association is due to a secondary, artifactual binding of the newly replicated chromatin region to the matrix elements. Pulse-chase experiments and experiments with continuous labelling were carried out to answer the question whether during replication the DNA is reeled through the replication complexes, i.e., whether newly replicated DNA is temporarily or permanently associated with the matrix. The results showed that at that time the matrix DNA does not move from its site of attachment. Since, according to the model of matrix-bound replication, the forks are assumed to be firmly anchored to high-salt resistant proteinaceous matrix structures, the chromatin fragments isolated with endonuclease not recognizing newly replicated DNA and purified by sucrose gradient centrifugation should be free of replication intermediates. The electronmicroscopic analysis of such fragments revealed the existence of intact replication micro-bubbles. Moreover, the fragments with replication configurations appeared as smooth chromatin fibres not attached to elements characteristic for the matrix. All these experiments suggest that the nuclear skeleton is not a native site of DNA replication in eukaryotic cells.     

Inheritance of the replication complex: a unique or common phenomenon in the control of DNA replication?

Early models of the regulation of initiation of DNA replication by protein complexes predicted that binding of a replication initiator protein to a replicator region is required for initiation of each DNA replication round, since after the initiation event the replication initiator should dissociate from DNA. It was, therefore, assumed that binding of the replication initiator is a signal for triggering DNA replication. However, more recent investigations have revealed that in many replicons this is not the case. Studies on the regulation of the replication of plasmids derived from bacteriophage lambda demonstrated that, once assembled, the replication complex can be inherited by one of the two daughter plasmid copies after each replication round and may function in subsequent replication rounds. Since this DNA-bound protein complex bears information about specific initiation of DNA replication, this phenomenon has been called "protein inheritance." A similar phenomenon has recently been reported for oriJ-based plasmids. Moreover, the current model of the initiation of DNA replication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae proposes that the origin recognition complex (ORC) remains bound to one copy of the ori sequence (the ARS region) after initiation of DNA replication. Thus, it seems plausible that protein inheritance is not unique for lambda plasmids, but may be a common phenomenon in the control of DNA replication, at least in microbes.     

Control of SV40 DNA replication by protein phosphorylation: a model for cellular DNA replication?

SV40 DNA replication has been studied extensively as a model for eukaryotic DNA replication. The initiation of SV40 DNA replication depends on certain cellular enzymes and on a multifunctional viral phosphoprotein, T antigen, whose activity is controlled positively and negatively by its phosphorylation state. Several cellular protein kinases and phosphatases that act on T antigen have now been identified. The recent elucidation of the step in initiation that is sensitive to T antigen's phosphorylation state raises the question of whether initiation of cellular DNA replication may utilize a similar regulatory mechanism.     

Is the MCM2-7 complex the eukaryotic DNA replication fork helicase?

The MCM2-7 complex is essential for both the initiation and elongation phases of eukaryotic chromosome replication. There is some evidence that MCM2-7 proteins may act as a DNA helicase; at the same time, a variety of other DNA helicases have also been implicated in the replication of eukaryotic chromosomes.     

Eukaryotic origins of DNA replication: could you please be more specific?

Initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication commences when the origin recognition complex (ORC) binds to DNA, recruiting helicases, polymerases, and necessary cofactors. While the biochemical mechanism and factors involved in replication initiation appear to be highly conserved, the DNA sequences at which these events take place in different organisms are not. Thus, while ORC appears to bind to specific DNA sequences in budding yeast, there is increasing new evidence that metazoan ORC complexes do not rely on sequence to be directed to origins of replication. Here, we review examples of specific and non-specific initiation, and we consider what, if not DNA sequence, accounts for DNA binding of ORC to defined regions in eukaryotic genomes.     

Discontinuous or semi‐discontinuous DNA replication in Escherichia coli?

The postulate that a stalled/collapsed replication fork will be generated when the replication complex encounters a UV-induced lesion in the template for leading-strand DNA synthesis is based on the model of semi-discontinuous DNA replication. A review of existing data indicates that the semi-discontinuous DNA replication model is supported by data from in vitro studies, while the discontinuous DNA replication model is supported by in vivo studies in Escherichia coli. Until the question of whether DNA replicates discontinuously in one or both strands is clearly resolved, any model building based on either one of the two DNA replication models should be treated with caution.     

Does capacity of DNA replication change during in vitro ageing?

We described elsewhere how a lack of change in the rate of DNA chain elongation occurred during in vitro ageing of human diploid fibroblasts. Here we further examined the rate of actual incorporation of tritiated thymidine, the center-to-center distance of replicons and the length of each phase of the cell cycle in order to extend our previous results to the other aspects of DNA replication. The results obtained showed that the rate of net DNA synthesis, the replicon size and the duration of S phase did not change during in vitro ageing. Our findings indicated that the reason why the greater part of the cell population at high population doubling levels becomes incapable of proliferating might not be the gradual decline in the ability of DNA replication. The regulation system(s) of DNA replication may alter during the period of culturing without any change in the capacities of the DNA replication machinery and, consequently, the non-cycling cells increase.     

The cause of cancer mutations: Improvable bad life or inevitable stochastic replication errors?

Despite substantial progress in understanding the mechanisms of carcinogenesis and fighting oncology diseases, cancer mortality remains rather high. Therefore, there is a striving to reduce this mortality to the level determined by endogenous biological factors. The review analyzes the mutations that lead to cell malignant transformation and describes the contribution that self-renewal of adult tissues makes to tumorigenesis. Cancer progression is considered as a development of a complicated system where cells mutate, evolve, and are subject to selection. Cancer paradoxes are described in conclusion.     

Radiation induced DNA DSBs: Contribution from stalled replication forks?

When cells are exposed to radiation serious lesions are introduced into the DNA including double strand breaks (DSBs), single strand breaks (SSBs), base modifications and clustered damage sites (a specific feature of ionizing radiation induced DNA damage). Radiation induced DNA damage has the potential to initiate events that can lead ultimately to mutations and the onset of cancer and therefore understanding the cellular responses to DNA lesions is of particular importance. Using γH2AX as a marker for DSB formation and RAD51 as a marker of homologous recombination (HR) which is recruited in the processing of frank DSBs or DSBs arising from stalled replication forks, we have investigated the contribution of SSBs and non-DSB DNA damage to the induction of DSBs in mammalian cells by ionizing radiation during the cell cycle. V79-4 cells and human HF19 fibroblast cells have been either irradiated with 0–20 Gy of γ radiation or, for comparison, treated with a low concentration of hydrogen peroxide, which is known to induce SSBs but not DSBs. Inhibition of the repair of oxidative DNA lesions by poly(ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor leads to an increase in radiation induced γH2AX and RAD51 foci which we propose is due to these lesions colliding with replication forks forming replication induced DSBs. It was confirmed that DSBs are not induced in G₁ phase cells by treatment with hydrogen peroxide but treatment does lead to DSB induction, specifically in S phase cells. We therefore suggest that radiation induced SSBs and non-DSB DNA damage contribute to the formation of replication induced DSBs, detected as RAD51 foci.