Neural coding of gustatory information.

The nervous system encodes information relating chemical stimuli to taste perception, beginning with transduction mechanisms at the receptor and ending in the representation of stimulus attributes by the activity of neurons in the brain. Recent studies have rekindled the long-standing debate about whether taste information is coded by the pattern of activity across afferent neurons or by specifically tuned 'labeled lines'. Taste neurons are broadly tuned to stimuli representing different qualities and are also responsive to stimulus intensity and often to touch and temperature. Their responsiveness is also modulated by a number of physiological factors. In addition to representing stimulus quality and intensity, activity in taste neurons must code information about the hedonic value of gustatory stimuli. These considerations suggest that individual gustatory neurons contribute to the coding of more than one stimulus parameter, making the response of any one cell meaningful only in the context of the activity of its neighbors.     

Developing a sense of taste

Taste buds are found in a distributed array on the tongue surface, and are innervated by cranial nerves that convey taste information to the brain. For nearly a century, taste buds were thought to be induced by nerves late in embryonic development. However, this view has shifted dramatically. A host of studies now indicate that taste bud development is initiated and proceeds via processes that are nerve-independent, occur long before birth, and governed by cellular and molecular mechanisms intrinsic to the developing tongue. Here we review the state of our understanding of the molecular and cellular regulation of taste bud development, incorporating important new data obtained through the use of two powerful genetic systems, mouse and zebrafish.     

A serotonin-sensitive sensor for investigation of taste cell-to-cell communication

Taste receptor cells are the taste sensation elements for sour, salty, sweet, bitter and umami sensations. It was demonstrated that there are cell-to-cell communications between type II (sour) and type III (sweet, bitter and umami) taste cells. Serotonin (5-HT) is released from type III cells, which is the only type of taste cells that has synaptic process with sensory afferent fibers. Then, taste information is transmitted via fibers to the brain. During this process, 5-HT plays important roles in taste information transmission. In order to explore a sensor to detect 5-HT released from taste cell or taste cell networks, we develop a 5-HT sensitive sensor based on LAPS chip. This sensor performs with a detection limit of 3.3 × 10(-13)M and a sensitivity of 19.1 mV per concentration decade. Upon the stimuli of sour and mix (bitter, sweet and umami) tastants, 5-HT released from taste cells could be detected flexibly, benefit from the addressability of LAPS chip. The experimental results show that the local concentration of 5-HT is around several nM, which is consistent with those from other methods. In addition, immunofluorescent imaging technique is utilized to confirm the functional existence of both type II and III cells in a cluster of isolated taste cells. Different types of taste cells are labeled with corresponding specific antibody. This 5-HT sensitive LAPS chip provides a potential and promising way to detect 5-HT and to investigate the taste coding and information communication mechanisms.     

Evolutionary origins of taste buds: phylogenetic analysis of purinergic neurotransmission in epithelial chemosensors

Taste buds are gustatory endorgans which use an uncommon purinergic signalling system to transmit information to afferent gustatory nerve fibres. In mammals, ATP is a crucial neurotransmitter released by the taste cells to activate the afferent nerve fibres. Taste buds in mammals display a characteristic, highly specific ecto-ATPase (NTPDase2) activity, suggesting a role in inactivation of the neurotransmitter. The purpose of this study was to test whether the presence of markers of purinergic signalling characterize taste buds in anamniote vertebrates and to test whether similar purinergic systems are employed by other exteroceptive chemosensory systems. The species examined include several teleosts, elasmobranchs, lampreys and hagfish, the last of which lacks vertebrate-type taste buds. For comparison, Schreiner organs of hagfish and solitary chemosensory cells (SCCs) of teleosts, both of which are epidermal chemosensory end organs, were also examined because they might be evolutionarily related to taste buds. Ecto-ATPase activity was evident in elongate cells in all fish taste buds, including teleosts, elasmobranchs and lampreys. Neither SCCs nor Schreiner organs show specific ecto-ATPase activity, suggesting that purinergic signalling is not crucial in those systems as it is for taste buds. These findings suggest that the taste system did not originate from SCCs but arose independently in early vertebrates.     

Hedonic taste in Drosophila revealed by olfactory receptors expressed in taste neurons

Taste and olfaction are each tuned to a unique set of chemicals in the outside world, and their corresponding sensory spaces are mapped in different areas in the brain. This dichotomy matches categories of receptors detecting molecules either in the gaseous or in the liquid phase in terrestrial animals. However, in Drosophila olfactory and gustatory neurons express receptors which belong to the same family of 7-transmembrane domain proteins. Striking overlaps exist in their sequence structure and in their expression pattern, suggesting that there might be some functional commonalities between them. In this work, we tested the assumption that Drosophila olfactory receptor proteins are compatible with taste neurons by ectopically expressing an olfactory receptor (OR22a and OR83b) for which ligands are known. Using electrophysiological recordings, we show that the transformed taste neurons are excited by odor ligands as by their cognate tastants. The wiring of these neurons to the brain seems unchanged and no additional connections to the antennal lobe were detected. The odor ligands detected by the olfactory receptor acquire a new hedonic value, inducing appetitive or aversive behaviors depending on the categories of taste neurons in which they are expressed i.e. sugar- or bitter-sensing cells expressing either Gr5a or Gr66a receptors. Taste neurons expressing ectopic olfactory receptors can sense odors at close range either in the aerial phase or by contact, in a lipophilic phase. The responses of the transformed taste neurons to the odorant are similar to those obtained with tastants. The hedonic value attributed to tastants is directly linked to the taste neurons in which their receptors are expressed.     

哺乳动物味觉的细胞生物学

味觉对于生命具有重要作用,在一定程度上决定了动物对食物的选择。哺乳动物味觉识别主要依赖于舌味蕾中的味细胞,味蕾由50～100个极化的神经上皮细胞聚集而成。通过对味蕾细胞的分析显示,味蕾是一种精巧的单元结构。这篇文章综述了味蕾细胞的形态、结构功能、细胞生物学活性以及味觉信息的传导。     

Network model of chemical-sensing system inspired by mouse taste buds

Taste buds endure extreme changes in temperature, pH, osmolarity, so on. Even though taste bud cells are replaced in a short span, they contribute to consistent taste reception. Each taste bud consists of about 50 cells whose networks are assumed to process taste information, at least preliminarily. In this article, we describe a neural network model inspired by the taste bud cells of mice. It consists of two layers. In the first layer, the chemical stimulus is transduced into an irregular spike train. The synchronization of the output impulses is induced by the irregular spike train at the second layer. These results show that the intensity of the chemical stimulus is encoded as the degree of the synchronization of output impulses. The present algorithms for signal processing result in a robust chemical-sensing system.     

Central mechanisms of roles of taste in reward and eating

Taste is unique among sensory systems in its innate association with mechanisms of reward and aversion in addition to its recognition of quality, e.g., sucrose is sweet and preferable, and quinine is bitter and aversive. Taste information is sent to the reward system and feeding center via the prefrontal cortices such as the mediodorsal and ventrolateral prefrontal cortices in rodents and the orbitofrontal cortex in primates. The amygdala, which receives taste inputs, also influences reward and feeding. In terms of neuroactive substances, palatability is closely related to benzodiazepine derivatives and beta-endorphin, both of which facilitate consumption of food and fluid. The reward system contains the ventral tegmental area, nucleus accumbens and ventral pallidum and finally sends information to the lateral hypothalamic area, the feeding center. The dopaminergic system originating from the ventral tegmental area mediates the motivation to consume palatable food. The actual ingestive behavior is promoted by the orexigenic neuropeptides from the hypothalamus. Even palatable food can become aversive and avoided as a consequence of a postingestional unpleasant experience such as malaise. The neural mechanisms of this conditioned taste aversion will also be elucidated.     

Remembering nutrient quality of sugar in Drosophila

Taste is an early stage in food and drink selection for most animals [1, 2]. Detecting sweetness indicates the presence of sugar and possible caloric content. However, sweet taste can be an unreliable predictor of nutrient value because some sugars cannot be metabolized. In addition, discrete sugars are detected by the same sensory neurons in the mammalian [3] and insect [4, 5] gustatory systems, making it difficult for animals to readily distinguish the identity of different sugars using taste alone [6-8]. Here we used an appetitive memory assay in Drosophila [9-11] to investigate the contribution of palatability and relative nutritional value of sugars to memory formation. We show that palatability and nutrient value both contribute to reinforcement of appetitive memory. Nonnutritious sugars formed less robust memory that could be augmented by supplementing with a tasteless but nutritious substance. Nutrient information is conveyed to the brain within minutes of training, when it can be used to guide expression of a sugar-preference memory. Therefore, flies can rapidly learn to discriminate between sugars using a postingestive reward evaluation system, and they preferentially remember nutritious sugars.     

NEUROPHYSIOLOGY AND HUMAN TASTE SENSATIONS

Taste sensations are of primary importance in food flavor. Any attempt to synthesize chemically the flavor of a natural food involves mainly taste active compounds. Many distinct taste sensations can be identified as associated with food compounds. Thirteen different taste sensations are discussed herein. These different taste sensations are differentiated on the basis of stimulus chemistry and peripheral nerve conveying the taste information. Neurophysiological examination of the peripheral nerves involved in taste reveals that the sensory neurons can, in any species, be subdivided into distinct neural groups. These different neural groups respond to distinct classes of chemicals and often display different neurophysiological characteristics. Altogether in four different species, nine functional neural taste groups can be distinguished. In many cases, these neural groups can be taken as analogs for the neural groups assumed to underly human taste sensations. Distinct human taste sensations can be considered to arise from the excitation or inhibition of different neural groups. For certain human taste sensations there are no animal neural analog groups; and for certain neural groups there are no analog human sensations.     

The molecular biology of taste transduction

Taste cells respond to a wide variety of chemical stimuli: certain ions are perceived as salty (Na⁺) or sour (H⁺); other small molecules are perceived as sweet (sugars) and bitter (alkaloids). Taste has evolutionary value allowing animals to respond positively (to sweet carhohydrates and salty NaCl) or aversively (to bitter poisons and corrosive acids). Recently, some of the proteins involved in taste transduction have been cloned. Several different G proteins have been identified and cloned from taste tissue: gustducin is a taste cell specific G protein closely related to the transducins. Work is under way to clone additional components of the taste transduction pathways. The combination of electrophysiology, biochemistry and molecular biology is being used to characterize taste receptor cells and their sensory transduction mechanisms.     

Taste receptor cell-based biosensor for taste specific recognition based on temporal firing

Taste receptor cells are the taste sensation elements expressing sour, salty, sweet, bitter and umami receptors, respectively. There are cell-to-cell communications between different types of cells. Nevertheless, the mechanism of taste sensation and taste information coded by taste receptor cell is not well understood at present and it is a long-standing issue. In order to explore taste sensation and analyze taste-firing responses from another point of view, we present a promising biomimetic taste receptor cell-based biosensor. The temporal firing responses to different tastants are recorded. Meanwhile, we investigate the firing rate and temporal firing of taste receptor cells. The experimental results are consistent with that from patch clamp and molecular biology experiment. Firing rate is dependent on the concentration of stimulus. PCA analysis (principal component analysis) of the temporal firing responses shows that the responses from different types of taste receptor cells can be distinguished. Furthermore, exogenous ATP is applied to mimic the effects of transmitter ATP (adenosine triphosphate) released from type II cells onto type III cells. Both enhanced and inhibitory effects on spontaneous firing are observed. This novel biomimetic hybrid biosensor provides a potential solution to investigate the taste sensation and coding mechanisms in a non-invasive way.     

Taste-responsive neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract receive gustatory information from both sides of the tongue in the hamster

Taste receptors on the left and right sides of the anterior tongue are innervated by chorda tympani (CT) fibers, which carry taste information to the ipsilateral nucleus of the solitary tract (NST). Although the anterior tongue is essential for taste, patients with unilateral CT nerve damage often report no subjective change in their taste experience. The standing theory that explains the taste constancy is the "release of inhibition", which hypothesizes that within the NST there are inhibitory interactions between inputs from the CT and glossopharyngeal nerves and that the loss of taste information from the CT is compensated by a release of inhibition on the glossopharyngeal nerve input. However, the possibility of compensation by taste input from the other side of the tongue has never been investigated in rodents. We recorded from 95 taste-responsive neurons in the NST and examined their responsiveness to stimulation of the contralateral CT. Forty-six cells were activated, mostly with excitatory responses (42 cells). Activation of NST cells induced by contralateral CT stimulation was blocked by microinjection of lidocaine into the contralateral NST but was not affected by anesthetization of the contralateral parabrachial nuclei (PbN). In addition, the NST cells that were activated by contralateral CT stimulation showed reduced responsiveness to taste stimulation after microinjection of lidocaine into the contralateral NST. These results demonstrate that nearly half of the taste neurons in the NST receive gustatory information from both sides of the tongue. This "cross talk" between bilateral NST may also contribute to the "taste constancy".     

The molecular physiology of taste transduction

Taste receptor cells use a variety of mechanisms to transduce chemical information into cellular signals. Seven-transmembrane-helix receptors initiate signaling cascades by coupling to G proteins, effector enzymes, second messengers and ion channels. Apical ion channels pass ions, leading to depolarizing and/or hyperpolarizing responses. New insights into the mechanisms of taste sensation have been gained from molecular cloning of the transduction elements, biochemical elucidation of the transduction pathways, and electrophysiological analysis of the function of taste cell ion channels.     

Taste effects of some amino acids and glutamate compounds in the rat

Behavioral responses to five L-amino acids (Gly, Arg, Leu, Ala,Met) and five related L-glutamate compounds (MSG, MKG, MAG,Gln, GluHCl) were measured using 1-min taste reactivity andstandard 24-h, two-bottle preference tests. Taste reactivitytests measure the immediate pattern of ingestive and aversiveoral motor behavior elicited by direct oral infusion of tastestimuli. By permitting acute observations in non-deprived rats,taste reactivity tests are more sensitive to taste factors thanstandard long-term tests. Three stimulus concentrations of eachcompound were selected by behavioral and electrophysiologicalcriteria. Taste reactivity results often conflicted with standardintake results. In taste reactivity tests both Gly and MSG elicitingestive oral motor responses that increase with stimulus concentrationin the absence of aversive behavior. The opposite responseswere obtained using long-term intake tests; MSG and Gly preferenceratios actually decrease with increasing concentration. Thesedata suggest a reinterpretation of standard, longterm intaketests. Specifically, effects of taste versus post-oral stimulimay be distinguished by contrasting taste reactivity and two-bottlepreference tests. Differences in the pattern of oral motor behaviorselicited by the amino acid and glutamate compounds are alsodiscussed.     

Spatially restricted expression of candidate taste receptors in the Drosophila gustatory system

BACKGROUND: Taste is an important sensory modality in most animals. In Drosophila, taste is perceived by gustatory neurons located in sensilla distributed on several different appendages throughout the body of the animal. Here we show that the gustatory receptors are encoded by a family of at least 54 genes (Gr genes), most of which are expressed exclusively in a small subset of taste sensilla located in narrowly defined regions of the fly's body. RESULTS: BLAST searches with the predicted amino acid sequences of 6 7-transmembrane-receptor genes of unknown function and 20 previously identified, putative gustatory receptor genes led to the identification of a large gene family comprising at least 54 genes. We investigated the expression of eight genes by using a Gal4 reporter gene assay and found that five of them were expressed in the gustatory system of the fly. Four genes were expressed in 1%-4% of taste sensilla, located in well-defined regions of the proboscis, the legs, or both. The fifth gene was expressed in about 20% of taste sensilla in all major gustatory organs, including the taste bristles on the anterior wing margin. Axon-tracing experiments demonstrated that neurons expressing a given Gr gene project their axons to a spatially restricted domain of the subesophageal ganglion in the fly brain. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that each taste sensillum represents a discrete, functional unit expressing at least one Gr receptor and that most Gr genes are expressed in spatially restricted domains of the gustatory system. These observations imply the potential for high taste discrimination of the Drosophila brain.     

Shh and Ptc are associated with taste bud maintenance in the adult mouse

In mammals, taste receptor cells are organized into taste buds on tongue. Taste buds are trophically maintained by taste neurons and under continuous renewal, even in adults. We found that the receptor for Sonic hedgehog (Shh), Patched1 (Ptc), was expressed around taste buds where cells were proliferating, and that Shh was expressed within basal cells of taste buds. Denervation caused the loss of Shh and Ptc expression before the degeneration of taste buds.     

Location of taste buds in intact taste papillae by a selective staining method

Summary Taste buds were found to stain strongly and selectively in intact papillae with highly acidic dyes such as ponceau S. In intact tongues the taste buds in the fungiform, circumvallate and foliate papillae of the cynomolgus monkey and in the fungiform papillae of the rat as well as the taste discs in the fungiform papillae of the frog could be visualized. This method enables a rapid location and counting of taste buds in taste papillae without preparing histological sections. In cynomolgus tongue material fixed in formalin, the dyes penetrate into the buds. In fresh tongues only the taste pore region of the buds stains, which suggests that in vivo taste buds are impenetrable underneath the pore.     

Location of taste buds in intact taste papillae by a selective staining method.

Taste buds were found to stain strongly and selectively in intact papillae with highly acidic dyes such as ponceau S. In intact tongues the taste buds in the fungiform, circumvallate and foliate papillae of the cynomolgus monkey and in the fungiform papillae of the rat as well as the taste discs in the fungiform papillae of the frog could be visualized. This method enables a rapid location and counting of taste buds in taste papillae without preparing histological sections. In cynomolgus tongue material fixed in formalin, the dyes penetrate into the buds. In fresh tongues only the taste pore region of the buds stains, which suggests that in vivo taste buds are impenetrable underneath the pore.