Comparison between the polymerase chain reaction and slot blot hybridization for the detection of HPV sequences in cervical scrapes

Sixty-four women presenting with a single mildly abnormal smear were investigated for infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 using both slot blot hybridization and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. PCR was nearly three times more sensitive for the detection of HPV 16 DNA than slot blot hybridization. HPV 16 was not significantly associated with a risk of progression to CIN if PCR was used to screen for infection. Women who smoked were at significantly greater risk of progression to CIN than non-smokers.     

Understanding HPV tests and their appropriate applications

Greater understanding of the role played by human papillomavirus (HPV) in the causation of disease has led to the development of an increasing number of HPV tests with different characteristics. The bewildering choice facing healthcare professionals and providers is daunting. Clearly, HPV testing is no longer simply of research interest, but can provide information that can be used for individual patient management and at the population level for cervical screening and vaccine surveillance. This review aims to provide the background to the development of HPV tests, to explain the different technologies and to discuss the challenges of the application of these optimally in the varied contexts of disease management. Few HPV tests are approved for clinical use and it is important that clinicians understand which test can be utilized, in what circumstances, with what specimens and the meaning of the report issued. HPV testing is no longer applicable only to cervical disease, and we have suggested additional areas, such as the oropharynx, in which HPV testing services might be implemented in the near future. New tests will continue to emerge and we have identified some of the indirect measures of HPV activity, or biomarkers, that could help in the risk stratification of HPV infection and associated disease. The challenges relating to the optimal application of the various HPV technologies are compounded by the lack of evidence regarding their performance in vaccinated populations. Currently published work, including modelling studies, has been undertaken in non‐immunized populations. We therefore end by addressing the issues regarding appropriate strategies and tests for immunized populations.     

Cervical cancer: cytological cervical screening in Iceland and implications of HPV vaccines

K. Sigurdsson
Cervical cancer: cytological cervical screening in Iceland and implications of HPV vaccines This paper reviews the Icelandic experience regarding the age‐specific effectiveness, optimal targeted age range and intervals in cervical cancer screening and the screening implications of the HPV16/18 vaccines. The background material is based on data from a screening programme with centralized records dating back to 1964, as well as from population‐based studies on the distribution of oncogenic HPV types in cancer and histologically verified CIN2‐3 lesions and from the Icelandic arm of the Future II trial with Gardasil^®. The findings confirm significant increased rates in the screened population of CIN2‐3, stage IA (microinvasive) cancer since 1979, mainly in the age group 20–34 years. These lesions start to accumulate within 3 years of a normal smear. Studies on the distribution of HPV types indicate that the marketed vaccines could lower the incidence of cancer and CIN2‐3 by about 67% and 53%, respectively, after taking into account reported cross‐protection. About 65% of women below 25 years of age had lesions related to the non‐vaccine types and after the last normal smear these cases accumulated at the same frequency as cases with vaccine‐included types. Cases with combined vaccine and non‐vaccine types accumulated at a slower rate. We conclude that screening should continue to start at age 20 years, with invitations at 2‐year intervals up to age 39 years and thereafter at 4‐year intervals up to age 65–69 years. Current data support the conclusion that the optimal age for catch‐up HPV vaccination should be considered in the context of sexual practices and the data do not support changes in the lower age limit or screening intervals for the vaccinated women.     

The evaluation of human papillomavirus genotyping in cervical liquid-based cytology specimens; using the Roche Linear Array HPV genotyping assay

Objective:  To ascertain the usefulness of the Roche Linear Array human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping assay for assessing HPV genotypes in liquid-based cytology (LBC) samples and to evaluate this methodology within a cytopathology laboratory. These tests are of importance as persistent infection with high-risk HPV genotypes is considered a causal factor in the development of cervical cancer.
Methods:  A total of 175 cervical LBC samples were tested using the Roche Linear Array HPV genotyping test. The suitability of the assay use in routine cytopathology laboratory was considered. HPV genotypes were matched to the cervical cytology results, which included negative, borderline nuclear abnormalities, mild, moderate and severe dyskaryosis.
Results:  The assay could be applied to screening samples with the combined result available at the reporting stage. There were no test failures. All samples used after cytological analysis had sufficient DNA for testing. The results were reproducible and easily read and there was concordance of results between biomedical scientists. The results of the assay showed co-infection with multiple HPV genotypes was common in both high-grade and low-grade cytology samples. The percentage of HPV+ samples in the normal cytology samples (although in this grouping the number of samples was low) was 37%. In the cytology samples reported as severe dyskaryosis the HPV genotypes most commonly found were HPV16 and HPV51.
Conclusion:  The assay was able to detect multiple HPV infection with a wide range of genotypes in LBC samples sent for routine cytological analysis. It would be suitable for use in a cytopathology laboratory. The results of the assay show that the genotype profile has some variation from other geographical regions, and more work is needed to determine population prevalence, to ascertain the impact of the HPV vaccine, to evaluate test for cure and HPV triage management.     

Significance of high-risk human papillomavirus detection by polymerase chain reaction in primary cervical cancer screening

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the incidence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and to assess its diagnostic usefulness in primary cervical screening. PCR testing for HPV type 16, 18, 31 and 33 was performed on 1305 specimens obtained during routine cervical cancer screening. We analysed the concurrent cervical smears and biopsy, and correlated them with the HPV infection status. We also evaluated histologically-proven cases with ASCUS smears according to HPV infection. HPV DNA was identified in eight (0.7%) of 1144 cytologically normal patients; nine (10.5%) of 86 ASCUS; seven (25.0%) of 28 LSIL; 26 (78.8%) of 33 HSIL; and in all of three squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). HPV positivity was significantly associated with cytohistological diagnosis for HSIL of more. In addition, HPV-positive ASCUS cases were found to be associated with histological abnormality rather than HPV-negative. The results indicate that high-risk HPV testing by PCR could be a useful adjunct tool for Pap smear in primary cervical screening. The combination of Pap smear and high-risk HPV testing by PCR might reduce unnecessary colposcopy-guided biopsy of women with cytological diagnosis of ASCUS.     

The ideal strategy for cervical cancer screening in Japan: Result from the Fukui Cervical Cancer Screening Study

Introduction

The aims of the Fukui Cervical Cancer Screening (FCCS) study are to determine the frequency of women with high‐risk HPV (hrHPV), whether HPV16 or HPV18 (HPV16/18), in the Japanese cancer screening population for the first time and to identify the best strategy for cervical cancer screening in Japan.

Methods

This study enrolled 7584 women aged ≥25 years who were undergoing routine screening. All women underwent LBC and cobas HPV tests. Women with abnormal cytology, whether hrHPV positive or negative; women with hrHPV positivity with either normal or abnormal cytology; and women randomly selected from women with normal cytology and negative hrHPV negative were referred for colposcopy.

Results

The prevalences of hrHPV positivity and HPV16/18 positivity were 6.8% and 1.7%, respectively. The baseline data from the FCCS study showed that the combination of HPV tests and cytology was more sensitive than cytology with respect to the detection of intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse. However, the specificity (94.1%) of the co‐testing strategy that required all women with abnormal cytology or hrHPV positivity to be referred for colposcopy was much lower than that (97.8%) of cytology. The sensitivity and specificity of the co‐testing strategy that required only women with abnormal cytology or HPV16/18 positivity to undergo colposcopy were 85.5% and 97.0%, respectively.

Conclusion

The baseline data from the FCCS study suggest that a cervical cancer screening strategy in which only women with abnormal cytology or HPV16/18 positivity undergo colposcopy offers a more balanced sensitivity and specificity than other strategies.     

Primary HPV testing: a proposal for co‐testing in initial rounds of screening to optimise sensitivity of cervical cancer screening

As explained by Kitchener in a previous issue of Cytopathology (2015; 26 :4‐6), primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is likely to be introduced in the UK for all women aged 25–64 years following pilot site studies already in place. This will be necessary when the prevalence of cervical cancer and its precursors declines when vaccination takes effect but there is a risk in abandoning cytology as a primary test: a risk that would be most apparent in the present unvaccinated population in which the prevalence of cervical cancer and its precursors is exceptionally high. HPV testing is more sensitive than cytology but has a significant false‐negative rate that could be detrimental to a successful screening programme if introduced without cytology backup. Accurate cytology would be needed for triage and could be compromised if HPV‐negative tests were excluded from examination. This article proposes a compromise: cytology and HPV co‐testing for the first two screening tests to optimise the sensitivity of the test as a whole. Registrations of invasive and in situ carcinoma of the uterine cervix in England indicate that the prevalence of the disease is highest in young women in the early rounds of screening. Calculations of the likely impact on the workload of this proposal have been based on a service evaluation of 295 cytology tests received at St Thomas’ Hospital, which suggests that the volume of cytology tests would be reduced by approximately 60% compared with 80% for primary HPV testing alone. This proposal should be debated openly before irrevocable changes are made to a skilled workforce.     

PTEN、HPV16/18-E6蛋白和雌激素受体在宫颈腺癌中的表达及其临床意义

目的：探讨宫颈腺癌组织中抑癌蛋白PTEN、人乳头瘤病毒（HPV）16/18-E6蛋白和雌激素受体（ER）的表达及其临床意义。方法：采用免疫组织化学S-P法对65例宫颈腺癌组织进行PTEN、HPV16/18-E6蛋白和ER检测,对30例慢性宫颈炎组织中HPV16/18-E6蛋白和ER的表达进行检测。结果：宫颈腺癌组织细胞核中PTEN的表达显著低于癌旁宫颈腺上皮组织（P〈0.01）,96%的宫颈腺癌细胞核呈低表达,而仅35%的癌旁宫颈腺上皮呈低表达（P〈0.01）;HPV16/18-E6蛋白和ER在宫颈腺癌中的阳性表达率分别为32.1%与49.4%,均显著高于慢性宫颈炎组织（P〈0.01）;HPV16/18-E6蛋白和ER的表达与宫颈腺癌的病理学分级、临床分期无关,在宫颈腺癌中的表达呈正相关。结论：PTEN在宫颈腺癌的发生中起一定的作用,其抑癌作用环节可能在细胞核水平;部分宫颈腺癌的发病可能与HPV16/18-E6蛋白过度表达有关;部分宫颈腺癌可能属于激素依赖性,雌激素可能有协同人乳头瘤病毒致癌的作用。     

Prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus type 16/18 infection among women with normal cytology: risk factor analysis and implications for screening and prophylaxis

Objective: To determine the prevalence of high‐risk human papillomavirus (HR‐HPV) 16/18 infection of uterine cervix among women in the reproductive age group, with cytologically normal cervical (Pap) smears; to analyse the risk factors for HR‐HPV acquisition and to address their implications for cervical cancer screening and prophylaxis in a low resource setting. Methods: Cervical samples from 769 cytologically negative women (age 18–45 years) attending a tertiary care centre in Delhi were subjected to HPV DNA testing and HR‐HPV 16/18 and low‐risk (LR)‐HPV 6/11 sub‐typing by polymerase chain reaction. Univariate risk factor analysis was carried out in HR‐HPV positive (n = 86) versus HR‐HPV negative women (n = 683) by chi‐square test. Results: The overall HPV prevalence among cytologically normal women was 16.6%. HR‐HPV16 was detected in 10.1%, whereas HPV18 was detected in 1% of women. HR‐HPV 16/18 comprised 67% of the total HPV positives. There was no decline in HR‐HPV positivity with age, and women aged 40–44 years were at significantly increased risk for HR‐HPV prevalence (P = 0.03). Statistically significant associations of HR‐HPV infection were found with risk factors such as high parity (P = 0.04), cervicitis/hypertrophic cervix (P = 0.01), unhealthy cervix (P = 0.04), rural residence (P = 0.03), low socioeconomic status (P = 0.01) and illiteracy (P = 0.07). Conclusions: Although the sample size was small, based on the observation that HR‐HPV 16 and 18 contributed significantly to the overall HPV prevalence in our setting, we speculate that testing/prophylaxis for these prevalent high‐risk types could perhaps make cervical cancer screening and preventive programmes cost‐effective. Larger community‐based studies on HPV prevalence and persistence are required to validate these findings before definitive recommendations can be made to the policy makers.     

乳头瘤病毒及协同因子与宫颈癌的关系

本研究旨在探讨宫颈癌前病变和宫颈癌的发生发展与人乳头瘤病毒及协同因子（HSV,CMV）的关系。 对81例不同宫颈病变组织进行HPV16/18和HPV6/11原位杂交,同时对103例不同宫颈病变组织用DNA扩增法检测HPV、HSV 和CMV。结果表明病毒DNA原位杂交信号的分布与HE染色中挖空细胞的分布一致。HPV16/18与不同宫颈病变组织原位杂交阳性率平均为51%,HPV6/11的则为64%。经PCR检测,HPV16/18、HPV6/11、HSV、 CMV在不同宫颈病变组织中的阳性率分别为21%、4%、23%和0%。HSV可协同HPV16/18恶性转化宫颈上皮细胞,并对其协同机制进行了细胞及分子生物学的探讨。 Abstract:The carcinogenesis of the human cervical precancerous lesion,cervical carcinoma is known closely associated with human papillomavirus (HPV).The purpose of this article is to identify whether HSV and CMV play as co factor role in the carcinogenesis.Eighty one cases of various cervical lesions were analyzed by HPV6/11,HPV16/18 in situ hybridization.Meanwhile,HPV,HSV and CMV were determined in 103 cases of various cervical lesions.The results show that the distribution of positive hybridization signal was consistent with the distribution of Koilocytic cells in HE stain.Of these cervical specimens investigated,the positive rates of HPV16/18 and HPV6/11 using ISH were 51% and 64%,respectively,the infection rates of HPV16/18,HPV6/11,HSV and CMV using PCR were 21%,4% 23% and 0%,respectively.The co operation effect of HPV and HSV occurred in the oncogenesis of human cervical carcinoma,and moreover,the cellular and molecular biological mechanisms were discussed.     

Identification of Genetic Variants of Human Papillomavirus in a Group of Mexican HIV/AIDS Patients and Their Possible Association with Cervical Cancer

Infections caused by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and human papillomavirus (HPV) cause thousands of deaths worldwide each year. So far, there has been no consensus on whether there is a direct relationship between the incidence of neoplasms and the immunosuppression caused by HIV that could help understand if coinfection increases the likelihood of cervical cancer. The objective of the study was to identify the presence of genetic variants of HPV in a group of HIV-positive women and their possible association with cervical cancer. Cervical samples were taken from HIV-positive patients for cytological analysis to identify the HPV genotype by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing. The most prevalent L1 capsid protein mutations in the HPV genotype were analyzed in silico. Various types of HPV were identified, both high-risk (HR) and low-risk (LR). The most prevalent genotype was HPV51. Analysis of the L1 gene sequences of HPV51 isolates showed nucleotide variations. Of the samples analyzed in Puebla, Mexico, HPV51 had the highest incidence (17.5%, 7/40). Different mutations, which could be used as population markers, were detected in this area, and they have not been reported in the L1 databases for HPV51 in Mexico. Genotypes 6, 14, 86, 87, 89, and 91, not detected or reported in samples from patients with HPV in Mexico, were also identified. Data from the population analyzed suggest no direct relationship between HIV immunosuppression and cervical cancer, regardless of the high- or low-risk HPV genotype. Furthermore, it is possible to develop regional population markers for the detection of HPV based on the mutations that occur in the sequence of nucleotides analyzed.     

Pin1，CyclinD1在宫颈癌中的表达及与HPV16／18感染的关系

研究肽基脯氨酰顺反异构酶Pin1,CyclinD1在宫颈液基细胞上皮内病变和宫颈癌中的表达与HPV16/18感染的关系,探讨其对宫颈上皮内病变和宫颈癌诊断的意义。经液基细胞学筛查,采用原位杂交方法对80例宫颈上皮内病变和宫颈癌,13例正常组织进行HPV检测分型,同时对HPV16/18阳性的标本进行Pin1,CyclinD1免疫组化。在正常宫颈组织、CINⅠ,CINⅡ-Ⅲ,浸润癌组织中Pin1表达率分别为7.7%(1/13)、57.1%(12/21)、68.4%(13/19)、85%(34/40)(P<0.05);CyclinD1表达率分别为0%、9.52%(2/21)、20.5% (4/19)、55%(22/40)。HPV16/18的表达率也随着宫颈病变的升级而升高,分别为15.4%(2/13)、42.9%(9/ 21)、57.9%(11/19)、82.5%(33/40)。Pin1和HPV16/18在宫颈病变中的表达高度相关(r_0=1.0,P<0.05);而CyclinD1的表达与HPV16/18相关性较小(r_0=0.4,P<0.05)。认识Pin1,cyclinD1和HPV16/18三者之间的关系及对宫颈上皮内病变和宫颈癌的筛查诊断具有重要意义。     

人乳头瘤病毒及宫颈癌疫苗的研究——解读2008年诺贝尔生理学或医学奖

德国科学家Harald zur Hausen因发现人乳头瘤病毒（HPV）导致子宫颈癌,与另外两位科学家共享了2008年的诺贝尔生理学或医学奖．HPV是一组小DNA病毒,目前己鉴定有118型．HPV感染人的上皮组织,诱发产生包括妇女宫颈癌和尖锐湿疣在内的多种良恶性增生性疾病,目前已有两种人乳头瘤病毒预防性疫苗上市．对病毒的生物学特性、致癌机制及相关的疫苗的研究进行综述．     

De-oncogenic HPV E6/E7 vaccine gets enhanced antigenicity and promotes tumoricidal synergy with cisplatin

In order to develop more effective therapeutic vaccines against cancers with high-risk human papillomavirus （HPV） infection, it is crucial to enhance the immunogenicity, eliminate the oncogenicity of oncoproteins, and take a combination of ET- and E6-containing vaccines. It has been shown recently that PE（AIII）-E7-KDEL3 （E7）, a fusion protein containing the HPVI6 oncoprotein E7 and the trans- location domain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A, is effective against TC-1 tumor cells inoculated in mice, there- fore, we engineered PE（AIII）-E6-CRL-KDEL3 （E6）, the deoncogenic versions of the E7 and E6 fusion proteins [i.e. PE（AIII）-E7（d）-KDEL3, E7（d）, and PE（AIII）-E6（d）-CRL- KDEL3, E6（d）] and tested the immunoefficacies of these fusion proteins as mono- and bivalent vaccines. Results indicated that the E7（d） get higher immunogenicity than its wild type and the E6 fusion proteins augmented the im- munogenicity and antitumor effects of their E7 counterparts. Furthermore, the bivalent vaccine system E7（d） plus E6（d）, in the presence of cisplatin, showed the best tumori- static and tumoricidal effects against established tumors in vivo. Therefore, it can be concluded that this novel therapeutic vaccine system, upon further optimization, may shed new light on clinical management of HPV-related carcinomas.     

Clinical relevance of human papillomavirus testing in cytopathology

Cancer of the uterine cervix is the second most common cancer in women worldwide. Currently, cervical screening is based on cytology alone. Because infection with high-risk human papillomavirus types (hrHPVs) is a necessary cause of cervical cancer, it has been postulated that screening might become more efficient when it is based on combined cytology and hrHPV testing. In this review we will discuss the advantages of added HPV tests in cervical cancer screening, as a quality control for false-negative smears, in triage of women with equivocal smears, in follow-up of women treated for CIN3 or cervical cancer and for the detection of cervical adenocarcinoma.     

Improved endocervical sampling and HPV viral load detection by Cervex-Brush® Combi

OBJECTIVE: Liquid-based cytology (LBC) for cervical screening is becoming increasingly used. Together with SurePath LBC, various collecting devices can be utilized, among which the Cervex-Brush is the most widely used. The new Rovers Cervex-Brush Combi combines the advantages of the Cervex-Brush with the EndoCervex-Brush increasing sampling of the endocervical canal. The objective of this study was to analyse and to compare the Cervex-Brush Combi with the Cervex-Brush for the collection of squamous and endocervical cells, human papillomavirus (HPV) typing/quantification and disease detection in SurePath LBC. METHODS: Using either the Cervex-Brush or the Cervex-Brush Combi 100 consecutive SurePath LBC samples were collected using each brush type. All 200 slides were read by the FocalPoint and screened by guided screening using slide wizards. The viral load of HPV type 16 E7, 18 E7, 31 E6, 33 L1, 33 E6, 35 E4, 39 E7, 45 E7, 51 E6, 52 L1, 52 E7, 53 E6, 56 E7, 58 L1, 58 E6, 59 E7, 66 E6 and 68 E7 was determined using a TaqMan-based real-time quantitative PCR analysis. RESULTS: The mean number of sampled squamous cells did not differ between the two brush types (54 963 versus 54 595 cells). The use of the Cervex-Brush Combi, however, resulted in a two- to threefold increase in the number of sampled endocervical cells (P < 0.00001). Using the Cervex-Brush Combi slightly more lesions were detected (three versus two low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions), and resulted in the detection of more atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (six versus three). In the Cervex-Brush group, 60% (3/5) of abnormal smears were positive for oncogenic HPV types, whereas 66.7% (6/9) of abnormal smears in the Cervex-Brush Combi group tested positive. The median HPV viral load for samples taken with the Cervex-Brush Combi was 0.1825 copies/cell and was significantly higher than in samples taken with the Cervex-Brush (0.0042 copies/cell) (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Sampling with the Cervex-Brush Combi resulted in the collection of the same amount of squamous cells, but in a two to threefold harvest of endocervical cells. This led to the detection of a higher viral load for oncogenic HPV and an increase in the number of detected abnormal smears.     

应用TDI-FP技术分析宫颈癌组织HPV16 E7基因A647G点突变

模板指导的末端碱基掺入反应结合荧光偏振检测技术(template direct dye-terminator incorporation with fluorescence- polarization,TDI-FP) 是SNP检测新技术. 应用TDI-FP方法分析中国陕西HPV16阳性宫颈组织HPV16 E7基因第647位核苷酸A→G热点突变(即A647G),首先在HPV16阳性的91例宫颈癌及49例正常/宫颈炎妇女宫颈DNA标本中,PCR扩增含647位点在内的HPV16 E7部分基因, 然后将紧邻647位点5′端的寡核苷酸探针与PCR产物内的模板杂交,并延伸一个与647位点碱基互补的荧光标记碱基：TAMRA-ddTTP或R110-ddCTP. 用荧光偏振仪读取荧光偏振 (FP) 值,根据升高的相应FP值判断647位点碱基. 结果表明,宫颈组织HPV16 E7 A647G的总体检出率为35.71% (50/140). 宫颈癌组的A→G突变率为42.86% (39/91),显著高于正常/宫颈炎组22.45% (11/49) 的突变率 (x2 = 5.778, P = 0.016),两组间的OR值为2.59 (95% CI = 1.17~5.71). 提示TDI-FP 可用于HPV有意义点突变的分析;我国陕西地区妇女HPV 16 A647G突变率及其对宫颈癌的警示性与其他地区相比有明显差异,该地区携带此突变病毒株的妇女患宫颈癌的风险可能较高     

ABC3 Part I: a review of the guidelines for terminology,classification and management of cervical cytology in England

J. H. F. Smith ABC3 Part I: a review of the guidelines for terminology, classification and management of cervical cytology in England The provision of guidance on cytology reporting and evaluation, first outlined in 1995 with the publication of Achievable Standards, Benchmarks for Reporting, and Criteria for Evaluating Cervical Cytopathology (ABC), and subsequently revised and expanded in a second edition in 2000, has been pivotal to the success of the National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme (NHSCSP), ensuring that standards are upheld, and that rigorous evaluation and quality assurance take place. In the last decade, major changes to the NHSCSP, notably the adoption of revised age ranges and screening intervals for all women in England, implementation of liquid‐based cytology and, most recently, the decision to introduce high‐risk human papillomavirus (HR‐HPV) testing for triage of low‐grade and borderline (equivalent to 'atypical') cytological abnormalities and test of cure after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) determined that an updated version of ABC was required. The third edition of ABC recommends adoption, with minor modification, of the revised British Society for Clinical Cytology terminology and provides guidance on the management of abnormal cytology results linked to this terminology taking account of HR‐HPV testing. To accommodate these changes, expanded result codes, which are electronic codes used to transfer management information to central computers for follow‐up, call and recall of individual women, have been developed. Further guidance on specimen adequacy is also provided. Revised performance indicators are described and explained in a separate article by R. Blanks in this issue of Cytopathology. All the changes in ABC3 are designed to support the mission statement of the NHSCSP that ‘the objective of cervical screening is to reduce cervical cancer incidence and mortality by screening with a high sensitivity for the detection of CIN2 or worse, whilst maintaining a high specificity’.