Molecular principles of the interactions of disordered proteins

Thorough knowledge of the molecular principles of protein-protein recognition is essential to our understanding of protein function at the cellular level. Whereas interactions of ordered proteins have been analyzed in great detail, complexes of intrinsically unstructured/disordered proteins (IUPs) have hardly been addressed so far. Here, we have collected a database of 39 complexes of experimentally verified IUPs, and compared their interfaces with those of 72 complexes of ordered, globular proteins. The characteristic differences found between the two types of complexes suggest that IUPs represent a distinct molecular implementation of the principles of protein-protein recognition. The interfaces do not differ in size, but those of IUPs cover a much larger part of the surface of the protein than for their ordered counterparts. Moreover, IUP interfaces are significantly more hydrophobic relative to their overall amino acid composition, but also in absolute terms. They rely more on hydrophobic-hydrophobic than on polar-polar interactions. Their amino acids in the interface realize more intermolecular contacts, which suggests a better fit with the partner due to induced folding upon binding that results in a better adaptation to the partner. The two modes of interaction also differ in that IUPs usually use only a single continuous segment for partner binding, whereas the binding sites of ordered proteins are more segmented. Probably, all these features contribute to the increased evolutionary conservation of IUP interface residues. These noted molecular differences are also manifested in the interaction energies of IUPs. Our approximation of these by low-resolution force-fields shows that IUPs gain much more stabilization energy from intermolecular contacts, than from folding, i.e. they use their binding energy for folding. Overall, our findings provide a structural rationale to the prior suggestions that many IUPs are specialized for functions realized by protein-protein interactions.     

Evolvability of yeast protein-protein interaction interfaces

The functional importance of protein-protein interactions indicates that there should be strong evolutionary constraint on their interaction interfaces. However, binding interfaces are frequently affected by amino acid replacements. Change due to coevolution within interfaces can contribute to variability but is not ubiquitous. An alternative explanation for the ability of surfaces to accept replacements may be that many residues can be changed without affecting the interaction. Candidates for these types of residues are those that make interchain interaction only through the protein main chain, β-carbon, or associated hydrogen atoms. Since almost all residues have these atoms, we hypothesize that this subset of interface residues may be more easily substituted than those that make interactions through other atoms. We term such interactions "residue type independent." Investigating this hypothesis, we find that nearly a quarter of residues in protein interaction interfaces make exclusively interchain residue-type-independent contacts. These residues are less structurally constrained and less conserved than residues making residue-type-specific interactions. We propose that residue-type-independent interactions allow substitutions in binding interfaces while the specificity of binding is maintained.     

Predicting Protein–Protein Interfaces that Bind Intrinsically Disordered Protein Regions

A long-standing goal in biology is the complete annotation of function and structure on all protein–protein interactions, a large fraction of which is mediated by intrinsically disordered protein regions (IDRs). However, knowledge derived from experimental structures of such protein complexes is disproportionately small due, in part, to challenges in studying interactions of IDRs. Here, we introduce IDRBind, a computational method that by combining gradient boosted trees and conditional random field models predicts binding sites of IDRs with performance approaching state-of-the-art globular interface predictions, making it suitable for proteome-wide applications. Although designed and trained with a focus on molecular recognition features, which are long interaction-mediating-elements in IDRs, IDRBind also predicts the binding sites of short peptides more accurately than existing specialized predictors. Consistent with IDRBind's specificity, a comparison of protein interface categories uncovered uniform trends in multiple physicochemical properties, positioning molecular recognition feature interfaces between peptide and globular interfaces.     

A simple physical model for the prediction and design of protein-DNA interactions

Protein-DNA interactions are crucial for many biological processes. Attempts to model these interactions have generally taken the form of amino acid-base recognition codes or purely sequence-based profile methods, which depend on the availability of extensive sequence and structural information for specific structural families, neglect side-chain conformational variability, and lack generality beyond the structural family used to train the model. Here, we take advantage of recent advances in rotamer-based protein design and the large number of structurally characterized protein-DNA complexes to develop and parameterize a simple physical model for protein-DNA interactions. The model shows considerable promise for redesigning amino acids at protein-DNA interfaces, as design calculations recover the amino acid residue identities and conformations at these interfaces with accuracies comparable to sequence recovery in globular proteins. The model shows promise also for predicting DNA-binding specificity for fixed protein sequences: native DNA sequences are selected correctly from pools of competing DNA substrates; however, incorporation of backbone movement will likely be required to improve performance in homology modeling applications. Interestingly, optimization of zinc finger protein amino acid sequences for high-affinity binding to specific DNA sequences results in proteins with little or no predicted specificity, suggesting that naturally occurring DNA-binding proteins are optimized for specificity rather than affinity. When combined with algorithms that optimize specificity directly, the simple computational model developed here should be useful for the engineering of proteins with novel DNA-binding specificities.     

Local and global anatomy of antibody‐protein antigen recognition

Deciphering antibody‐protein antigen recognition is of fundamental and practical significance. We constructed an antibody structural dataset, partitioned it into human and murine subgroups, and compared it with nonantibody protein‐protein complexes. We investigated the physicochemical properties of regions on and away from the antibody‐antigen interfaces, including net charge, overall antibody charge distributions, and their potential role in antigen interaction. We observed that amino acid preference in antibody‐protein antigen recognition is entropy driven, with residues having low side‐chain entropy appearing to compensate for the high backbone entropy in interaction with protein antigens. Antibodies prefer charged and polar antigen residues and bridging water molecules. They also prefer positive net charge, presumably to promote interaction with negatively charged protein antigens, which are common in proteomes. Antibody‐antigen interfaces have large percentages of Tyr, Ser, and Asp, but little Lys. Electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions in the Ag binding sites might be coupled with Fab domains through organized charge and residue distributions away from the binding interfaces. Here we describe some features of antibody‐antigen interfaces and of Fab domains as compared with nonantibody protein‐protein interactions. The distributions of interface residues in human and murine antibodies do not differ significantly. Overall, our results provide not only a local but also a global anatomy of antibody structures.     

Specificity of molecular interactions in transient protein-protein interaction interfaces

In this study, we investigate what types of interactions are specific to their biological function, and what types of interactions are persistent regardless of their functional category in transient protein-protein heterocomplexes. This is the first approach to analyze protein-protein interfaces systematically at the molecular interaction level in the context of protein functions. We perform systematic analysis at the molecular interaction level using classification and feature subset selection technique prevalent in the field of pattern recognition. To represent the physicochemical properties of protein-protein interfaces, we design 18 molecular interaction types using canonical and noncanonical interactions. Then, we construct input vector using the frequency of each interaction type in protein-protein interface. We analyze the 131 interfaces of transient protein-protein heterocomplexes in PDB: 33 protease-inhibitors, 52 antibody-antigens, 46 signaling proteins including 4 cyclin dependent kinase and 26 G-protein. Using kNN classification and feature subset selection technique, we show that there are specific interaction types based on their functional category, and such interaction types are conserved through the common binding mechanism, rather than through the sequence or structure conservation. The extracted interaction types are C(alpha)-- H...O==C interaction, cation...anion interaction, amine...amine interaction, and amine...cation interaction. With these four interaction types, we achieve the classification success rate up to 83.2% with leave-one-out cross-validation at k = 15. Of these four interaction types, C(alpha)--H...O==C shows binding specificity for protease-inhibitor complexes, while cation-anion interaction is predominant in signaling complexes. The amine ... amine and amine...cation interaction give a minor contribution to the classification accuracy. When combined with these two interactions, they increase the accuracy by 3.8%. In the case of antibody-antigen complexes, the sign is somewhat ambiguous. From the evolutionary perspective, while protease-inhibitors and sig-naling proteins have optimized their interfaces to suit their biological functions, antibody-antigen interactions are the happenstance, implying that antibody-antigen complexes do not show distinctive interaction types. Persistent interaction types such as pi...pi, amide-carbonyl, and hydroxyl-carbonyl interaction, are also investigated. Analyzing the structural orientations of the pi...pi stacking interactions, we find that herringbone shape is a major configuration in transient protein-protein interfaces. This result is different from that of protein core, where parallel-displaced configurations are the major configuration. We also analyze overall trend of amide-carbonyl and hydroxyl-carbonyl interactions. It is noticeable that nearly 82% of the interfaces have at least one hydroxyl-carbonyl interactions.     

Insights from the structural analysis of protein heterodimer interfaces

Protein heterodimer complexes are often involved in catalysis, regulation, assembly, immunity and inhibition. This involves the formation of stable interfaces between the interacting partners. Hence, it is of interest to describe heterodimer interfaces using known structural complexes. We use a non-redundant dataset of 192 heterodimer complex structures from the protein databank (PDB) to identify interface residues and describe their interfaces using amino-acids residue property preference. Analysis of the dataset shows that the heterodimer interfaces are often abundant in polar residues. The analysis also shows the presence of two classes of interfaces in heterodimer complexes. The first class of interfaces (class A) with more polar residues than core but less than surface is known. These interfaces are more hydrophobic than surfaces, where protein-protein binding is largely hydrophobic. The second class of interfaces (class B) with more polar residues than core and surface is shown. These interfaces are more polar than surfaces, where binding is mainly polar. Thus, these findings provide insights to the understanding of protein-protein interactions.     

Amyloidogenic Regions and Interaction Surfaces Overlap in Globular Proteins Related to Conformational Diseases

Protein aggregation underlies a wide range of human disorders. The polypeptides involved in these pathologies might be intrinsically unstructured or display a defined 3D-structure. Little is known about how globular proteins aggregate into toxic assemblies under physiological conditions, where they display an initially folded conformation. Protein aggregation is, however, always initiated by the establishment of anomalous protein-protein interactions. Therefore, in the present work, we have explored the extent to which protein interaction surfaces and aggregation-prone regions overlap in globular proteins associated with conformational diseases. Computational analysis of the native complexes formed by these proteins shows that aggregation-prone regions do frequently overlap with protein interfaces. The spatial coincidence of interaction sites and aggregating regions suggests that the formation of functional complexes and the aggregation of their individual subunits might compete in the cell. Accordingly, single mutations affecting complex interface or stability usually result in the formation of toxic aggregates. It is suggested that the stabilization of existing interfaces in multimeric proteins or the formation of new complexes in monomeric polypeptides might become effective strategies to prevent disease-linked aggregation of globular proteins.     

Transient complexes of redox proteins: structural and dynamic details from NMR studies

Redox proteins participate in many metabolic routes, in particular those related to energy conversion. Protein-protein complexes of redox proteins are characterized by a weak affinity and a short lifetime. Two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy has been applied to many redox protein complexes, providing a wealth of information about the process of complex formation, the nature of the interface and the dynamic properties of the complex. These studies have shown that some complexes are non-specific and exist as a dynamic ensemble of orientations while in other complexes the proteins assume a single orientation. The binding interface in these complexes consists of a small hydrophobic patch for specificity, surrounded by polar, uncharged residues that may enhance dissociation, and, in most complexes, a ring or patch of charged residues that enhances the association by electrostatic interactions. The entry and exit port of the electrons is located within the hydrophobic interaction site, ensuring rapid electron transfer from one redox centre to the next.     

Protein-protein interaction hotspots carved into sequences

Protein-protein interactions, a key to almost any biological process, are mediated by molecular mechanisms that are not entirely clear. The study of these mechanisms often focuses on all residues at protein-protein interfaces. However, only a small subset of all interface residues is actually essential for recognition or binding. Commonly referred to as "hotspots," these essential residues are defined as residues that impede protein-protein interactions if mutated. While no in silico tool identifies hotspots in unbound chains, numerous prediction methods were designed to identify all the residues in a protein that are likely to be a part of protein-protein interfaces. These methods typically identify successfully only a small fraction of all interface residues. Here, we analyzed the hypothesis that the two subsets correspond (i.e., that in silico methods may predict few residues because they preferentially predict hotspots). We demonstrate that this is indeed the case and that we can therefore predict directly from the sequence of a single protein which residues are interaction hotspots (without knowledge of the interaction partner). Our results suggested that most protein complexes are stabilized by similar basic principles. The ability to accurately and efficiently identify hotspots from sequence enables the annotation and analysis of protein-protein interaction hotspots in entire organisms and thus may benefit function prediction and drug development. The server for prediction is available at http://www.rostlab.org/services/isis.     

The roles of contact residue disorder and domain composition in characterizing protein-ligand binding specificity and promiscuity

Most protein chains interact with only one ligand but a small number of protein chains can bind several ligands, and many examples are available in the protein-ligand complex database of PDB. Among these proteins, some show preferences for the ligands or types of ligands they bind; however, so far we have only poor understanding of what determines protein-ligand binding and its specificity. Here we investigate the structural and functional properties of proteins in protein-ligand complexes. Analysis of the protein-ligand complex dataset from the PDB structure database reveals that proteins with more interactions have more disordered contact residues. Those proteins containing few disordered contact residues that bind multiple ligands have a tendency to consist of several domains. Analysis of physicochemical properties of hub contact residues binding multiple ligands indicates that they are enriched for hydrophilic, charged, polar and His-Asp catalytic triad residues. Finally, in order to differentiate proteins binding different classes of ligands, we mapped the three most prominent classes of ligands onto different superfamily domains. Our results demonstrate that contact residue disorder and ordered multiple domains are complementary factors that play a crucial role in determining ligand binding specificity and promiscuity.     

Charged residues at protein interaction interfaces: unexpected conservation and orchestrated divergence

Protein-protein interactions play an essential role in the functioning of cell. The importance of charged residues and their diverse role in protein-protein interactions have been well studied using experimental and computational methods. Often, charged residues located in protein interaction interfaces are conserved across the families of homologous proteins and protein complexes. However, on a large scale, it has been recently shown that charged residues are significantly less conserved than other residue types in protein interaction interfaces. The goal of this work is to understand the role of charged residues in the protein interaction interfaces through their conservation patterns. Here, we propose a simple approach where the structural conservation of the charged residue pairs is analyzed among the pairs of homologous binary complexes. Specifically, we determine a large set of homologous interactions using an interaction interface similarity measure and catalog the basic types of conservation patterns among the charged residue pairs. We find an unexpected conservation pattern, which we call the correlated reappearance, occurring among the pairs of homologous interfaces more frequently than the fully conserved pairs of charged residues. Furthermore, the analysis of the conservation patterns across different superkingdoms as well as structural classes of proteins has revealed that the correlated reappearance of charged residues is by far the most prevalent conservation pattern, often occurring more frequently than the unconserved charged residues. We discuss a possible role that the new conservation pattern may play in the long-range electrostatic steering effect.     

Accounting for protein-solvent contacts facilitates design of nonaggregating lattice proteins

The folding specificity of proteins can be simulated using simplified structural models and knowledge-based pair-potentials. However, when the same models are used to simulate systems that contain many proteins, large aggregates tend to form. In other words, these models cannot account for the fact that folded, globular proteins are soluble. Here we show that knowledge-based pair-potentials, which include explicitly calculated energy terms between the solvent and each amino acid, enable the simulation of proteins that are much less aggregation-prone in the folded state. Our analysis clarifies why including a solvent term improves the foldability. The aggregation for potentials without water is due to the unrealistically attractive interactions between polar residues, causing artificial clustering. When a water-based potential is used instead, polar residues prefer to interact with water; this leads to designed protein surfaces rich in polar residues and well-defined hydrophobic cores, as observed in real protein structures. We developed a simple knowledge-based method to calculate interactions between the solvent and amino acids. The method provides a starting point for modeling the folding and aggregation of soluble proteins. Analysis of our simple model suggests that inclusion of these solvent terms may also improve off-lattice potentials for protein simulation, design, and structure prediction.     

A comparative analysis of interhelical polar interactions of various alpha-helix packings in proteins

One hundred twenty globular proteins and forty five "leucine zippers" representing all types of packing of long alpha-helices were studied in terms of revealing and comparing their interhelical hydrogen and salt bonds. Many previous studies of "leucine zippers" and their analogs showed that interhelical interactions between polar groups could impart specificity to packing of an alpha-helix. The current comparison demonstrated that basically, globular proteins and "leucine zippers" had similar interhelical polar interactions with presumably a similar structural role. However, depending on packing of alpha-helices, the networks of interhelical polar bonds were shown to be distinct and determined both by physicochemical properties of involved amino acid residues and by the relative positions of hydrophobic and hydrophilic residues on the surface of alpha-helices. The revealed distinction is probably crucial for selecting the unique packing of an alpha-helix.     

Pinpoint mapping of recognition residues on the cohesin surface by progressive homologue swapping

The high affinity cohesin-dockerin interaction dictates the suprastructural assembly of the multienzyme cellulosome complex. The connection between affinity and species specificity was studied by exploring the recognition properties of two structurally related cohesin species of divergent specificity. The cohesins were examined by progressive rounds of swapping, in which corresponding homologous stretches were interchanged. The specificity of binding of the resultant chimeric cohesins was determined by enzyme-linked affinity assay and complementary protein microarray. In succeeding rounds, swapped segments were systematically contracted, according to the binding behavior of previously generated chimeras. In the fourth and final round we discerned three residues, reputedly involved in interspecies binding specificity. By replacing only these three residues, we were able to convert the specificity of the resultant mutated cohesin, which bound preferentially to the rival dockerin with approximately 20% capacity of the wild-type interaction. These residues represent but 3 of the 16 contact residues that participate in the cohesin-dockerin interaction. This approach allowed us to differentiate, in a structure-independent fashion, between residues critical for interspecies recognition and binding residues per se.     

Protein binding specificity versus promiscuity

Interactions between macromolecules in general, and between proteins in particular, are essential for any life process. Examples include transfer of information, inhibition or activation of function, molecular recognition as in the immune system, assembly of macromolecular structures and molecular machines, and more. Proteins interact with affinities ranging from millimolar to femtomolar and, because affinity determines the concentration required to obtain 50% binding, the amount of different complexes formed is very much related to local concentrations. Although the concentration of a specific binding partner is usually quite low in the cell (nanomolar to micromolar), the total concentration of other macromolecules is very high, allowing weak and non-specific interactions to play important roles. In this review we address the question of binding specificity, that is, how do some proteins maintain monogamous relations while others are clearly polygamous. We examine recent work that addresses the molecular and structural basis for specificity versus promiscuity. We show through examples how multiple solutions exist to achieve binding via similar interfaces and how protein specificity can be tuned using both positive and negative selection (specificity by demand). Binding of a protein to numerous partners can be promoted through variation in which residues are used for binding, conformational plasticity and/or post-translational modification. Natively unstructured regions represent the extreme case in which structure is obtained only upon binding. Many natively unstructured proteins serve as hubs in protein-protein interaction networks and such promiscuity can be of functional importance in biology.     

Structural analysis of cation-pi interactions in DNA binding proteins

Cation-pi interactions play an important role in the stability of protein structures. In this work, we have analyzed the influence of cation-pi interactions in DNA binding proteins. We observed cation-pi interactions in 45 out of 62 DNA binding proteins and there is no significant correlation between the number of amino acid residues and number of cation-pi interactions. These interactions are mainly formed by long-range contacts, and the role of short and medium-range contacts is minimal. The preference of Arg is higher than Lys to form cation-pi interactions. The pair-wise cation-pi interaction energy between aromatic and positively charged residues shows that Arg-Tyr energy is the strongest among the possible six pairs. The structural analysis of cation-pi interaction forming residues shows that Lys, Trp, and Tyr prefer to be in the binding site of protein-DNA complexes. Further, the accessible surface areas of cation-pi interaction forming cationic residues are significantly less than that of other residues. The preference of cation-pi interaction forming residues in different secondary structures shows that Lys prefers to be in strand and Phe prefers to be in turn regions. The results obtained in the present study will be useful in understanding the contribution of cation-pi interactions to the stability and specificity of protein-DNA complexes.