Identification of a chemical that inhibits the mycobacterial UvrABC complex in nucleotide excision repair

Bacterial DNA can be damaged by reactive nitrogen and oxygen intermediates (RNI and ROI) generated by host immunity, as well as by antibiotics that trigger bacterial production of ROI. Thus a pathogen's ability to repair its DNA may be important for persistent infection. A prominent role for nucleotide excision repair (NER) in disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) was suggested by attenuation of uvrB-deficient Mtb in mice. However, it was unknown if Mtb's Uvr proteins could execute NER. Here we report that recombinant UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC from Mtb collectively bound and cleaved plasmid DNA exposed to ultraviolet (UV) irradiation or peroxynitrite. We used the DNA incision assay to test the mechanism of action of compounds identified in a high-throughput screen for their ability to delay recovery of M. smegmatis from UV irradiation. 2-(5-Amino-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-ylbenzo[f]chromen-3-one) (ATBC) but not several closely related compounds inhibited cleavage of damaged DNA by UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC without intercalating in DNA and impaired recovery of M. smegmatis from UV irradiation. ATBC did not affect bacterial growth in the absence of UV exposure, nor did it exacerbate the growth defect of UV-irradiated mycobacteria that lacked uvrB. Thus, ATBC appears to be a cell-penetrant, selective inhibitor of mycobacterial NER. Chemical inhibitors of NER may facilitate studies of the role of NER in prokaryotic pathobiology.     

Architecture of nucleotide excision repair complexes: DNA is wrapped by UvrB before and after damage recognition

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a major DNA repair mechanism that recognizes a broad range of DNA damages. In Escherichia coli, damage recognition in NER is accomplished by the UvrA and UvrB proteins. We have analysed the structural properties of the different protein-DNA complexes formed by UvrA, UvrB and (damaged) DNA using atomic force microscopy. Analysis of the UvrA(2)B complex in search of damage revealed the DNA to be wrapped around the UvrB protein, comprising a region of about seven helical turns. In the UvrB-DNA pre-incision complex the DNA is wrapped in a similar way and this DNA configuration is dependent on ATP binding. Based on these results, a role for DNA wrapping in damage recognition is proposed. Evidence is presented that DNA wrapping in the pre-incision complex also stimulates the rate of incision by UvrC.     

'Close-fitting sleeves': DNA damage recognition by the UvrABC nuclease system

DNA damage recognition represents a long-standing problem in the field of protein-DNA interactions. This article reviews our current knowledge of how damage recognition is achieved in bacterial nucleotide excision repair through the concerted action of the UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC proteins.     

Cdt2-mediated XPG degradation promotes gap-filling DNA synthesis in nucleotide excision repair

Xeroderma pigmentosum group G (XPG) protein is a structure-specific repair endonuclease, which cleaves DNA strands on the 3′ side of the DNA damage during nucleotide excision repair (NER). XPG also plays a crucial role in initiating DNA repair synthesis through recruitment of PCNA to the repair sites. However, the fate of XPG protein subsequent to the excision of DNA damage has remained unresolved. Here, we show that XPG, following its action on bulky lesions resulting from exposures to UV irradiation and cisplatin, is subjected to proteasome-mediated proteolytic degradation. Productive NER processing is required for XPG degradation as both UV and cisplatin treatment-induced XPG degradation is compromised in NER-deficient XP-A, XP-B, XP-C, and XP-F cells. In addition, the NER-related XPG degradation requires Cdt2, a component of an E3 ubiquitin ligase, CRL4^Cdt2. Micropore local UV irradiation and in situ Proximity Ligation assays demonstrated that Cdt2 is recruited to the UV-damage sites and interacts with XPG in the presence of PCNA. Importantly, Cdt2-mediated XPG degradation is crucial to the subsequent recruitment of DNA polymerase δ and DNA repair synthesis. Collectively, our data support the idea of PCNA recruitment to damage sites which occurs in conjunction with XPG, recognition of the PCNA-bound XPG by CRL4^Cdt2 for specific ubiquitylation and finally the protein degradation. In essence, XPG elimination from DNA damage sites clears the chromatin space needed for the subsequent recruitment of DNA polymerase δ to the damage site and completion of gap-filling DNA synthesis during the final stage of NER.     

Role of p21WAF1 in the Cellular Response to UV

UV or gamma irradiation mediated DNA damage activates p53 and induces cell cycle arrest. Induction of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21WAF1 by p53 after DNA damage plays an important role in cell cycle arrest after gamma irradiation. The p53 mediated cell cycle arrest has been postulated to allow cells to repair the DNA damage. Repair of UV damaged DNA occurs primarily by the nucleotide excision pathway (NER). It is known that p21WAF1 binds PCNA and inhibits PCNA function in DNA replication. PCNA is also required for repair by NER but there have been conflicting reports on whether p21 can inhibit PCNA function in NER. It has therefore been difficult to integrate the UV induced cell cycle arrest by p21 in the context of repair of UV damaged DNA. A recent study reported that p21WAF1 protein is degraded after low but not high doses of UV irradiation, that cell cycle arrest after UV is p21 independent, and that at low dose UV irradiation p21 degradation is essential for optimal DNA repair. These findings shed new light on the role of p21 in the cellular response to UV and clarify some outstanding issues concerning p21 function.     

Role of p21WAF1 in the cellular response to UV

UV or g irradiation mediated DNA damage activates p53 and induces cell cycle arrest. Induction of cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor p21WAF1 by p53 after DNA damage plays an important role in cell cycle arrest after gamma irradiation. The p53 mediated cell cycle arrest has been postulated to allow cells to repair the DNA damage. Repair of UV damaged DNA occurs primarily by the nucleotide excision pathway (NER). It is known that p21WAF1 binds PCNA and inhibits PCNA function in DNA replication. PCNA is also required for repair by NER but there have been conflicting reports on whether p21WAF1 can inhibit PCNA function in NER. It has therefore been difficult to integrate the UV induced cell cycle arrest by p21 in the context of repair of UV damaged DNA. A recent study reported that p21WAF1 protein is degraded after low but not high doses of UV irradiation, that cell cycle arrest after UV is p21 independent, and that at low dose UV irradiation p21WAF1 degradation is essential for optimal DNA repair. These findings shed new light on the role of p21 in the cellular response to UV and clarify some outstanding issues concerning p21WAF1 function.     

Cooperative damage recognition by UvrA and UvrB: identification of UvrA residues that mediate DNA binding

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is responsible for the recognition and removal of numerous structurally unrelated DNA lesions. In prokaryotes, the proteins UvrA, UvrB and UvrC orchestrate the recognition and excision of aberrant lesions from DNA. Despite the progress we have made in understanding the NER pathway, it remains unclear how the UvrA dimer interacts with DNA to facilitate DNA damage recognition. The purpose of this study was to define amino acid residues in UvrA that provide binding energy to DNA. Based on conservation among approximately 300 UvrA sequences and 3D-modeling, two positively charged residues, Lys680 and Arg691, were predicted to be important for DNA binding. Mutagenesis and biochemical analysis of Bacillus caldontenax UvrA variant proteins containing site directed mutations at these residues demonstrate that Lys680 and Arg691 make a significant contribution toward the DNA binding affinity of UvrA. Replacing these side chains with alanine or negatively charged residues decreased UvrA binding 3-37-fold. Survival studies indicated that these mutant proteins complemented a WP2 uvrA(-) strain of bacteria 10-100% of WT UvrA levels. Further analysis by DNase I footprinting of the double UvrA mutant revealed that the UvrA DNA binding defects caused a slower rate of transfer of DNA to UvrB. Consequently, the mutants initiated the oligonucleotide incision assay nearly as well as WT UvrA thus explaining the observed mild phenotype in the survival assay. Based on our findings we propose a model of how UvrA binds to DNA.     

Cdt2-mediated XPG degradation promotes gap-filling DNA synthesis in nucleotide excision repair

Xeroderma pigmentosum group G (XPG) protein is a structure-specific repair endonuclease, which cleaves DNA strands on the 3′ side of the DNA damage during nucleotide excision repair (NER). XPG also plays a crucial role in initiating DNA repair synthesis through recruitment of PCNA to the repair sites. However, the fate of XPG protein subsequent to the excision of DNA damage has remained unresolved. Here, we show that XPG, following its action on bulky lesions resulting from exposures to UV irradiation and cisplatin, is subjected to proteasome-mediated proteolytic degradation. Productive NER processing is required for XPG degradation as both UV and cisplatin treatment-induced XPG degradation is compromised in NER-deficient XP-A, XP-B, XP-C, and XP-F cells. In addition, the NER-related XPG degradation requires Cdt2, a component of an E3 ubiquitin ligase, CRL4^Cdt2. Micropore local UV irradiation and in situ Proximity Ligation assays demonstrated that Cdt2 is recruited to the UV-damage sites and interacts with XPG in the presence of PCNA. Importantly, Cdt2-mediated XPG degradation is crucial to the subsequent recruitment of DNA polymerase δ and DNA repair synthesis. Collectively, our data support the idea of PCNA recruitment to damage sites which occurs in conjunction with XPG, recognition of the PCNA-bound XPG by CRL4^Cdt2 for specific ubiquitylation and finally the protein degradation. In essence, XPG elimination from DNA damage sites clears the chromatin space needed for the subsequent recruitment of DNA polymerase δ to the damage site and completion of gap-filling DNA synthesis during the final stage of NER.     

Surviving the sun: repair and bypass of DNA UV lesions

Structural studies of UV-induced lesions and their complexes with repair proteins reveal an intrinsic flexibility of DNA at lesion sites. Reduced DNA rigidity stems primarily from the loss of base stacking, which may manifest as bending, unwinding, base unstacking, or flipping out. The intrinsic flexibility at UV lesions allows efficient initial lesion recognition within a pool of millions to billions of normal DNA base pairs. To bypass the damaged site by translesion synthesis, the specialized DNA polymerase η acts like a molecular "splint" and reinforces B-form DNA by numerous protein-phosphate interactions. Photolyases and glycosylases that specifically repair UV lesions interact directly with UV lesions in bent DNA via surface complementation. UvrA and UvrB, which recognize a variety of lesions in the bacterial nucleotide excision repair pathway, appear to exploit hysteresis exhibited by DNA lesions and conduct an ATP-dependent stress test to distort and separate DNA strands. Similar stress tests are likely conducted in eukaryotic nucleotide excision repair.     

Analyzing the handoff of DNA from UvrA to UvrB utilizing DNA-protein photoaffinity labeling

To better define the molecular architecture of nucleotide excision repair intermediates it is necessary to identify the specific domains of UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC that are in close proximity to DNA damage during the repair process. One key step of nucleotide excision repair that is poorly understood is the transfer of damaged DNA from UvrA to UvrB, prior to incision by UvrC. To study this transfer, we have utilized two types of arylazido-modified photoaffinity reagents that probe residues in the Uvr proteins that are closest to either the damaged or non-damaged strands. The damaged strand probes consisted of dNTP analogs linked to a terminal arylazido moiety. These analogs were incorporated into double-stranded DNA using DNA polymerase beta and functioned as both the damage site and the cross-linking reagent. The non-damaged strand probe contained an arylazido moiety coupled to a phosphorothioate-modified backbone of an oligonucleotide opposite the damaged strand, which contained an internal fluorescein adduct. Six site-directed mutants of Bacillus caldotenax UvrB located in different domains within the protein (Y96A, E99A, R123A, R183E, F249A, and D510A), and two domain deletions (Delta2 and Deltabeta-hairpin), were assayed. Data gleaned from these mutants suggest that the handoff of damaged DNA from UvrA to UvrB proceeds in a three-step process: 1) UvrA and UvrB bind to the damaged site, with UvrA in direct contact; 2) a transfer reaction with UvrB contacting mostly the non-damaged DNA strand; 3) lesion engagement by the damage recognition pocket of UvrB with concomitant release of UvrA.     

Localization of UvrA and Effect of DNA Damage on the Chromosome of Bacillus subtilis

We found that the nucleotide excision repair protein UvrA, which is involved in DNA damage recognition, localizes to the entire chromosome both before and after damage in living Bacillus subtilis cells. We suggest that the UvrA(2)B damage recognition complex is constantly scanning the genome, searching for lesions in the DNA. We also found that DNA damage induces a dramatic reconfiguration of the chromosome such that it no longer fills the entire cell as it does during normal growth. This reconfiguration is reversible after low doses of damage and is dependent on the damage-induced SOS response. We suggest that this reconfiguration of the chromosome after damage may be either a reflection of ongoing DNA repair or an active mechanism to protect the cell's genome. Similar observations have been made in Escherichia coli, indicating that the alteration of chromosome structure after DNA damage may be a widespread phenomenon.     

Stimulation of the UvrABC enzyme-catalyzed repair reactions by the UvrD protein (DNA helicase II).

An in vitro assay system was constructed using highly purified preparations of UvrA, UvrB, UvrC, UvrD proteins and DNA polymerase I, the objective being to analyse the role of UvrD protein in excision repair of UV-induced DNA damage. UvrABC enzyme-initiated repair synthesis was greatly enhanced by the addition of UvrD protein to the reaction mixture. Further analysis revealed that UvrD protein stimulated introduction of strand breaks in irradiated DNA by UvrABC enzyme but had no effect on the DNA polymerase I reaction. Thus, the site of action of UvrD protein is probably at the incision-excision step and not in later steps in excision repair.     

Mismatch repair proteins recruited to ultraviolet light-damaged sites lead to degradation of licensing factor Cdt1 in the G1 phase

Cdt1 is rapidly degraded by CRL4^Cdt2 E3 ubiquitin ligase after UV (UV) irradiation. Previous reports revealed that the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway is responsible for the rapid Cdt1-proteolysis. Here, we show that mismatch repair (MMR) proteins are also involved in the degradation of Cdt1 after UV irradiation in the G1 phase. First, compared with the rapid (within ～15 min) degradation of Cdt1 in normal fibroblasts, Cdt1 remained stable for ～30 min in NER-deficient XP-A cells, but was degraded within ～60 min. The delayed degradation was also dependent on PCNA and CRL4^Cdt2. The MMR proteins Msh2 and Msh6 were recruited to the UV-damaged sites of XP-A cells in the G1 phase. Depletion of these factors with small interfering RNAs prevented Cdt1 degradation in XP-A cells. Similar to the findings in XP-A cells, depletion of XPA delayed Cdt1 degradation in normal fibroblasts and U2OS cells, and co-depletion of Msh6 further prevented Cdt1 degradation. Furthermore, depletion of Msh6 alone delayed Cdt1 degradation in both cell types. When Cdt1 degradation was attenuated by high Cdt1 expression, repair synthesis at the damaged sites was inhibited. Our findings demonstrate that UV irradiation induces multiple repair pathways that activate CRL4^Cdt2 to degrade its target proteins in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, leading to efficient repair of DNA damage.     

Dependence of DNA dark repair on protein synthesis in Escherichia coli.

Summary We investigated the influence of aminoacidless treatments applied prior and after UV irradiation on survival, dimer excision, postirradiation DNA degradation, DNA synthesis and sedimentation profiles of parental DNA ofE. coli B/r Hcr⁺ cells. In dependence on the treatment applied, the fluence 50 J/m² yielded distinctly different fractions of survivors within 0,03–85%. In all cases dimers were completely excised. The rate of DNA degradation was similar during a 30–40 min period after UV during which the bulk of dimers was excised. Degradation ceased, however, earlier in the prestarved cells than in exponentially growing ones; it was prolonged by aminoacidless postincubation. Sedimentation profiles of parental DNA did not differ during the whole period of dimer excision. In cells DNA synthesis was not restored for several hours after addition of amino acids. In cells addition of amino acids resulted in a fast resumption of DNA synthesis. We conclude that removal of dimers and repair of gaps were similar in all cases. We believe that aminoacidless treatments influence production and repair of damage to the sites of DNA replication. The treatment appears to prevent this damage when applied before UV irradiation, but interferes with its restoration when applied after UV irradiation. Consequently, the former treatment increases survival of cells while the latter produces an opposite effects.     

Role of the two ATPase domains of Escherichia coli UvrA in binding non-bulky DNA lesions and interaction with UvrB

The UvrA protein is the initial DNA damage-sensing protein in bacterial nucleotide excision repair and detects a wide variety of structurally unrelated lesions. After initial recognition of DNA damage, UvrA loads the UvrB protein onto the DNA. This protein then verifies the presence of a lesion, after which UvrA is released from the DNA.UvrA contains two ATPase domains, both belonging to the ABC ATPase superfamily. We have determined the activities of two mutants, in which a single domain was deactivated. Inactivation of either one ATPase domain in Escherichia coli UvrA results in a complete loss of ATPase activity, indicating that both domains function in a cooperative way. We could show that this ATPase activity is not required for the recognition of bulky lesions by UvrA, but it does promote the specific binding to the less distorting cyclobutane–pyrimidine dimer (CPD). The two ATPase mutants also show a difference in UvrB-loading, depending on the length of the DNA substrate. The ATPase domain I mutant was capable of loading UvrB on a lesion in a 50 bp fragment, but this loading was reduced on a longer substrate. For the ATPase domain II mutant the opposite was found: UvrB could not be loaded on a 50 bp substrate, but this loading was rescued when the length of the fragment was increased. This differential loading of UvrB by the two ATPase mutants could be related to different interactions between the UvrA and UvrB subunits.     

Roles of PriA protein and double-strand DNA break repair functions in UV-induced restriction alleviation in Escherichia coli

It has been widely considered that DNA modification protects the chromosome of bacteria E. coli K-12 against their own restriction-modification systems. Chromosomal DNA is protected from degradation by methylation of target sequences. However, when unmethylated target sequences are generated in the host chromosome, the endonuclease activity of the EcoKI restriction-modification enzyme is inactivated by the ClpXP protease and DNA is protected. This process is known as restriction alleviation (RA) and it can be induced by UV irradiation (UV-induced RA). It has been proposed that chromosomal unmethylated target sequences, a signal for the cell to protect its own DNA, can be generated by homologous recombination during the repair of damaged DNA. In this study, we wanted to further investigate the genetic requirements for recombination proteins involved in the generation of unmethylated target sequences. For this purpose, we monitored the alleviation of EcoKI restriction by measuring the survival of unmodified lambda in UV-irradiated cells. Our genetic analysis showed that UV-induced RA is dependent on the excision repair protein UvrA, the RecA-loading activity of the RecBCD enzyme, and the primosome assembly activity of the PriA helicase and is partially dependent on RecFOR proteins. On the basis of our results, we propose that unmethylated target sequences are generated at the D-loop by the strand exchange of two hemi-methylated duplex DNAs and subsequent initiation of DNA replication.     

A Structural Model for the Damage-sensing Complex in Bacterial Nucleotide Excision Repair

Nucleotide excision repair is distinguished from other DNA repair pathways by its ability to process a wide range of structurally unrelated DNA lesions. In bacteria, damage recognition is achieved by the UvrA·UvrB ensemble. Here, we report the structure of the complex between the interaction domains of UvrA and UvrB. These domains are necessary and sufficient for full-length UvrA and UvrB to associate and thereby form the DNA damage-sensing complex of bacterial nucleotide excision repair. The crystal structure and accompanying biochemical analyses suggest a model for the complete damage-sensing complex.Nucleotide excision repair is distinguished from other DNA repair pathways by its ability to process a diverse set of lesions. In bacteria, the initial steps are carried out by three proteins: UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC. The UvrA·UvrB complex conducts surveillance of DNA and recognizes damage. Having located a lesion, UvrA “loads” UvrB onto the DNA at the damaged sites and then dissociates. Damage searching, formation of the UvrB·DNA “preincision” complex, and dissociation of UvrA are regulated by ATP (1). UvrB subsequently recruits the endonuclease UvrC, which catalyzes incisions on either side of the lesion (2, 3). Following incision, UvrC and the damage-containing oligonucleotide are removed by UvrD (helicase II), whereas UvrB remains bound to the gapped DNA and recruits DNA polymerase I for repair synthesis. Sealing of the single-stranded nick completes the repair process and restores the original DNA sequence (4).Since its discovery more than 40 years ago, bacterial nucleotide excision repair has been extensively studied, resulting in a large body of work that describes the protein components and the details of how they operate. Notwithstanding the trove of genetic and biochemical data, several key questions remain unanswered. For example, how does the same set of proteins handle a diverse set of lesions while maintaining specificity? How do UvrA and UvrB cooperate during damage recognition, and what is the precise role of ATP? Ongoing studies in the field, including those described below, aim to address these issues.Recently, we reported the structure of Geobacillus stearothermophilus UvrA and the identification of binding sites for DNA and UvrB (5). We also established that the identified UvrB-binding domain is necessary and sufficient to mediate the UvrA-UvrB interaction and that the isolated interaction domains of UvrA (5) and UvrB (6) bind to each other in solution.To understand the interaction between UvrA and UvrB, we have determined the crystal structure of the complex between the two isolated interaction domains. The structure revealed that UvrA-UvrB interaction interface is largely polar, mediated by several highly conserved charged residues. Site-directed mutagenesis and biochemical characterization of the mutant proteins confirmed the importance of the observed interactions. Based on the interaction domain complex structure, we have constructed a structural model for the full-length UvrA·UvrB ensemble and propose two models for lesion recognition that will serve as a basis for future experiments.     

Ultraviolet- and X-Ray-Induced Responses of a Deoxyribonucleic Acid Polymerase-Deficient Mutant of Escherichia coli

Escherichia coli K-12, polAl(-) is a mutant strain whose extracts are deficient in Kornberg deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) polymerase activity. We have compared the mutant and parental strains on the basis of a number of responses to ultraviolet (UV) and X-irradiation. For both types of radiation, the mutant is more sensitive by approximately the same factor as measured by reduction in colony formation, depression of DNA synthesis, and enhancement of DNA degradation. The rate of repair of X-ray-induced single-strand breaks in the mutant is also slower, as is the repair of breaks after excision repair of UV damage. On the other hand, the mutant has a significant capability to reactivate UV-irradiated lambda phage, although it is almost totally deficient in the ability to carry out UV reactivation. The data indicate that the polAl mutation leaves the cells with some ability to perform excision and strand-rejoining repair but that an exonuclease, whose identity remains obscure, is the agent responsible for the extensive breakdown of the DNA in polAl(-) cells after irradiation.     

Involvement of the nucleotide excision repair protein UvrA in instability of CAG*CTG repeat sequences in Escherichia coli.

Several human genetic diseases have been associated with the genetic instability, specifically expansion, of trinucleotide repeat sequences such as (CTG)(n).(CAG)(n). Molecular models of repeat instability imply replication slippage and the formation of loops and imperfect hairpins in single strands. Subsequently, these loops or hairpins may be recognized and processed by DNA repair systems. To evaluate the potential role of nucleotide excision repair in repeat instability, we measured the rates of repeat deletion in wild type and excision repair-deficient Escherichia coli strains (using a genetic assay for deletions). The rate of triplet repeat deletion decreased in an E. coli strain deficient in the damage recognition protein UvrA. Moreover, loops containing 23 CTG repeats were less efficiently excised from heteroduplex plasmids after their transformation into the uvrA(-) strain. As a result, an increased proportion of plasmids containing the full-length repeat were recovered after the replication of heteroduplex plasmids containing unrepaired loops. In biochemical experiments, UvrA bound to heteroduplex substrates containing repeat loops of 1, 2, or 17 CAG repeats with a K(d) of about 10-20 nm, which is an affinity about 2 orders of magnitude higher than that of UvrA bound to the control substrates containing (CTG)(n).(CAG)(n) in the linear form. These results suggest that UvrA is involved in triplet repeat instability in cells. Specifically, UvrA may bind to loops formed during replication slippage or in slipped strand DNA and initiate DNA repair events that result in repeat deletion. These results imply a more comprehensive role for UvrA, in addition to the recognition of DNA damage, in maintaining the integrity of the genome.