Effect of Time of Day and Partial Sleep Deprivation on Short‐Term,High‐Power Output

The purpose of this study was to determine whether delaying bedtime or advancing rising time by 4 h affects anaerobic performance of individuals the following day in the morning and afternoon. Eleven subjects participated in the study, during which we measured the maximal, peak, and mean powers (i.e., P_max [force‐velocity test], P_peak, and P_mean [Wingate test], respectively). Measurements were performed twice daily, at 07∶00 and 18∶00 h, following a reference normal sleep night (RN), a partial sleep deprivation timed at the beginning of the night (SDB), and a partial sleep deprivation timed at the end of the night (SDE), and oral temperature was measured every 4 h. Each of the three experimental conditions was separated by a one‐week period. Our results showed a circadian rhythm in oral temperature, and analysis of variance revealed a significant sleep×test‐time effect on peak power (P_peak), mean power (P_mean), and maximal power (P_max). These variables improved significantly from the morning to the afternoon for all three experimental conditions. Whereas the morning‐afternoon improvement in the measures was similar after the RN and SDB conditions, it was smaller following the SDE condition. There was no significant difference in the effect of the two sleep‐deprivation conditions on anaerobic performances at 07∶00 and at 18∶00 h under the SDB condition in comparison with the post‐reference night. However, the performance variables were significantly lower at 18∶00 h after the SDE condition. In conclusion, a 4 h partial sleep deprivation at the end of the night appears to be more disturbing than partial sleep deprivation at the beginning of the night.     

Alteration of period and amplitude of circadian rhythms in shift workers. With special reference to temperature, right and left hand grip strength

48 male shift workers in various industries volunteered to document circadian rhythms in sleeping and working, oral temperature, grip strength of both hands, peak expiratory flow and heart rate. All physiological variables were self-measured 4 to 5 times a day for 2 to 4 weeks. Individual time series were analyzed according to several statistical methods (power spectrum, cosinor, chi squares, ANOVA, correlation, etc.) in order to estimate rhythm parameters such as circadian period (tau) and amplitude (A), and to evaluate subgroup differences with regard to tolerance to shift work, age, duration of shift work, speed of rotation and type of industry. The present study confirms for oral temperature and extends to other variables (grip strength of both hands, heart rate) that intolerance to shift work is frequently associated with both internal desynchronization and small circadian amplitude. The internal desynchronization among several circadian rhythms supports the hypothesis that these latter are driven by several oscillators. Many differences were observed between circadian rhythms in right and left hand grip strength: circadian tau in oral temperature was correlated with that in the grip strength of the dominant hand but not with that of the other hand; changes in tau s of the non-dominant hand were age-related but did not correlate with temperature tau; only the circadian A of the non-dominant hand was associated with a desynchronization. Thus, circadian rhythms in oral temperature and dominant hand grip strength may be driven by the same oscillator while that of the non-dominant hand may be governed by a different one. Internal desynchronization between both hand grip rhythms as well as desynchronization of performance rhythms reported by others provide indirect evidence that circadian oscillator(s) may be located in the human cerebral cortex.     

Effects of 24-Hour Shift Work with Nighttin Napping on Circadian Rhythm Characteristi in Ambulance Personnel

Forty-two ambulance personnel engaged in a 24-h shift system participated in a chronobiological field study to study the effects of 24-h shift work on circadian rhythm characteristics. Autorhythmometry of circadian rhythms of oral temperature, right and left grip strengths, and heart rate plus subjective assessment of drowsiness, fatigue, and attention was performed every ～ 4 h except during sleep for 7 days. Cosinor and power spectral analyses were applied to the longitudinal data of each individual. Changes in circadian period different from 24 h of oral temperature, grip strengths, and heart rate plus subjective drowsiness, fatigue, and attention were observed in ambulance personnel. The incidence of circadian periodicity different from 24 h in oral temperature and right and left grip strength was 28.6%, 35.7%, and 47.6%, respectively. The incidence was relatively lower than that of shift workers engaged in a discontinuous 8-h shift system we reported on previously. Working conditions allowing ambulance personnel to nap when not called for emergency (for > 4 h) might contribute to a stabilization of circadian rhythms. Furthermore, long nighttime ambulance service amounting to >100 min was significantly associated with a high incidence of at least one prominent circadian period among oral temperature and right and left grip strength rhythms different from 24 h. In conclusion, 24-h shift work altered the characteristics of circadian rhythms of ambulance personnel; nighttime naps seemed to have a favorable effect on averting changes in circadian rhythms.     

Internal Desynchronization of Circadian Rhythms and Tolerance to Shift Work

Intolerance to shift work may result from individual susceptibility to an internal desynchronization. Some shift workers (SW) who show desynchronization of their circadian rhythms (e.g., sleep‐wake, body temperature, and grip strength of both hands) exhibit symptoms of SW intolerance, such as sleep alteration, persistent fatigue, sleep medication dependence, and mood disturbances, including depression. Existing time series data previously collected from 48 male Caucasian French SW were reanalyzed specifically to test the hypothesis that internal synchronization of circadian rhythms is associated with SW intolerance and symptoms. The entry of the subjects into the study was randomized. Three groups were formed thereafter: SW with good tolerance (n=14); SW with poor tolerance, as evident by medical complaints for at least one year (n=19); and former SW (n=15) with very poor tolerance and who had been discharged from night work for at 1.5 yr span but who were symptom‐free at the time of the study. Individual and longitudinal time series of selected variables (self‐recorded sleep‐wake data using a sleep log, self‐measured grip strength of both hands using a Colin Gentile dynamometer, and oral temperature using a clinical thermometer) were gathered for at least 15 days, including during one or two night shifts. Measurements were performed 4–5 times/24 h. Power spectra that quantify the prominent period (τ) and t‐test, chi square, and correlation coefficient were used as statistical tools. The mean (±SEM) age of SW with good tolerance was greater than that of SW with poor tolerance (44.9±2.1 yrs vs. 40.1±2.6 yrs, p<.001) and of former SW discharged from night work (very poor tolerance; 33.4±1.7, p<.001). The shift-work duration (yrs) was longer in SW with good than poor tolerance (19.9±2.2 yrs vs. 15.7±2.2; p<0.002) and former SW (10.7±1.2; p<.0001). The correlation between subject age and shift-work duration was stronger in tolerant SW (r=0.97, p<.0001) than in non‐tolerant SW (r=0.80, p<0.001) and greater than that of former SW (r=0.72, p<.01). The mean sleep‐wake rhythm τ was 24 h for all 48 subjects. The number of desynchronized circadian rhythms (τ differing from 24 h) was greater in non‐tolerant than in tolerant SW (chi square=38.9, p<.0001). In Former SW (i.e., 15 individuals assessed in follow‐up studies done 1.5 to 20 yrs after return to day work), both symptoms of intolerance and internal desynchronization were reduced or absent. The results suggest that non‐tolerant SW are particularly sensitive to the internal desynchronization of their circadian time organization.     

Circadian Rhythm in Plasma Noradrenaline of Healthy Sleep-Deprived Subjects

Under normal sleep-wake conditions, noradrenaline (NA) secretions in supine subjects exhibit a weak circadian variation with a peak that occurs around noon; the sleep span is characterized by reduced NA secretion. Some investigators have reported that the circadian NA rhythm is completely obliterated during sleep deprivation. In our laboratory, plasma NA was assayed every hour for 24 h in nine healthy men 20-23 years of age. All men were deprived of sleep and were required to eat and walk around every hour to prevent sleep. However, subjects remained supine for 20 min before blood samples were collected to eliminate the effect of activity. Persistence of a slight decrease in the night concentration in several subjects, despite sleep deprivation, suggests that NA secretion may be influenced by a biological clock whose activity becomes visible when the influence of posture is removed.     

Partial sleep deprivation reduces phase advances to light in humans

Partial sleep deprivation is increasingly common in modern society. This study examined for the first time if partial sleep deprivation alters circadian phase shifts to bright light in humans. Thirteen young healthy subjects participated in a repeated-measures counterbalanced design with 2 conditions. Each condition had baseline sleep, a dim-light circadian phase assessment, a 3-day phase-advancing protocol with morning bright light, then another phase assessment. In one condition (no sleep deprivation), subjects had an 8-h sleep opportunity per night during the advancing protocol. In the other condition (partial sleep deprivation), subjects were kept awake for 4 h in near darkness (<0.25 lux), immediately followed by a 4-h sleep opportunity per night during the advancing protocol. The morning bright light stimulus was four 30-min pulses of bright light (~5000 lux), separated by 30-min intervals of room light. The light always began at the same circadian phase, 8 h after the baseline dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO). The average phase advance without sleep deprivation was 1.8 ± 0.6 (SD) h, which reduced to 1.4 ± 0.6 h with partial sleep deprivation (p < 0.05). Ten of the 13 subjects showed reductions in phase advances with partial sleep deprivation, ranging from 0.2 to 1.2 h. These results indicate that short-term partial sleep deprivation can moderately reduce circadian phase shifts to bright light in humans. This may have significant implications for the sleep-deprived general population and for the bright light treatment of circadian rhythm sleep disorders such as delayed sleep phase disorder.     

Effects of Partial and Acute Total Sleep Deprivation on Performance across Cognitive Domains,Individuals and Circadian Phase

Background

Cognitive performance deteriorates during extended wakefulness and circadian phase misalignment, and some individuals are more affected than others. Whether performance is affected similarly across cognitive domains, or whether cognitive processes involving Executive Functions are more sensitive to sleep and circadian misalignment than Alertness and Sustained Attention, is a matter of debate.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We conducted a 2 × 12-day laboratory protocol to characterize the interaction of repeated partial and acute total sleep deprivation and circadian phase on performance across seven cognitive domains in 36 individuals (18 males; mean ± SD of age = 27.6±4.0 years). The sample was stratified for the rs57875989 polymorphism in PER3, which confers cognitive susceptibility to total sleep deprivation. We observed a deterioration of performance during both repeated partial and acute total sleep deprivation. Furthermore, prior partial sleep deprivation led to poorer cognitive performance in a subsequent total sleep deprivation period, but its effect was modulated by circadian phase such that it was virtually absent in the evening wake maintenance zone, and most prominent during early morning hours. A significant effect of PER3 genotype was observed for Subjective Alertness during partial sleep deprivation and on n-back tasks with a high executive load when assessed in the morning hours during total sleep deprivation after partial sleep loss. Overall, however, Subjective Alertness and Sustained Attention were more affected by both partial and total sleep deprivation than other cognitive domains and tasks including n-back tasks of Working Memory, even when implemented with a high executive load.

Conclusions/Significance

Sleep loss has a primary effect on Sleepiness and Sustained Attention with much smaller effects on challenging Working Memory tasks. These findings have implications for understanding how sleep debt and circadian rhythmicity interact to determine waking performance across cognitive domains and individuals.     

Comparing Sleep‐Loss Sleepiness and Sleep Inertia: Lapses Make the Difference

To compare the behavioral effects of sleep‐loss sleepiness (performance impairment due to sleep loss) and sleep inertia (period of impaired performance that follows awakening), mean response latencies and number of lapses from a visual simple reaction‐time task were analyzed. Three experimental conditions were designed to manipulate sleepiness and sleep‐inertia levels: uninterrupted sleep, partial sleep reduction, and total sleep deprivation. Each condition included two consecutive nights (the first always a night of uninterrupted sleep, and the second either a night of uninterrupted sleep, a night when sleep was reduced to 3 h, or a night of total sleep deprivation), as well as two days in which performance was assessed at 10 different time points (08:00, 08:30, 09:00, 09:30, 10:00, 11:00, 14:00, 17:00, 20:00, and 23:00 h). From 08:00 to 09:00 h, reaction times in the partial sleep‐reduction and total sleep‐deprivation conditions were at a similar level and were slower than those observed in the uninterrupted sleep condition. In the same time period, the frequency of lapses in the total sleep‐deprivation condition was higher than in the partial sleep‐reduction condition, while this latter condition never differed from the uninterrupted sleep condition. The results indicate that both sleep inertia and sleep‐loss sleepiness lead to an increase in response latencies, but only extreme sleepiness leads to an increase in lapse frequency. We conclude that while reaction times slow as a result of both sleep inertia and sleep‐loss sleepiness, lapses appear to be a specific feature of sleep‐loss sleepiness.     

THE EFFECT OF 40 HOURS OF CONSTANT WAKEFULNESS ON NUMBER COMPARISON PERFORMANCE

We investigated the effects of sleep loss and circadian rhythm on number comparison performance. Magnitude comparison of single-digits is robustly characterized by a distance effect: Close numbers (e.g., 5 versus 6) produce longer reaction times than numbers further apart (e.g., 2 versus 8). This distance effect is assumed to reflect the difficulty of a comparison process based on an analogous representation of general magnitude. Twelve male participants were required to stay awake for 40?h in a quasi-constant-routine protocol. Response speed and accuracy deteriorated between 00:00 and 06:00?h but recovered afterwards during the next day, indicating a circadian rhythm of elementary cognitive function (i.e., attention and speed of mental processing). The symbolic distance effect, however, did not increase during the nighttime, indicating that neither cumulative sleep loss nor the circadian clock prolongs numerical comparison processes. The present findings provide first evidence for a relative insensitivity of symbolic magnitude processing against the temporal variation in energy state. (Author correspondence: michael.steinborn@uni-tuebingen.de)     

RIGHT- AND LEFT-BRAIN HEMISPHERE. RHYTHM IN REACTION TIME TO LIGHT SIGNALS IS TASK-LOAD-DEPENDENT: AGE,GENDER, AND HANDGRIP STRENGTH RHYTHM COMPARISONS

In healthy mature subjects simple reaction time (SRT) to a single light signal (an easy task) is associated with a prominent rhythm with τ=24 h of dominant (DH) as well as nondominant (NDH) hand performance, while three-choice reaction time (CRT), a complex task, is associated with τ=24 h of the DH but τ<24 h of the NDH. The aims of the study were to assess the influence of age and gender on the difference in τ of the NDH and DH, as it relates to the corresponding cortical hemisphere of the brain, in comparison to the rhythm in handgrip strength. Healthy subjects, 9 (5 M and 4 F) adolescents 10–16 yr of age and 15 (8 M and 7 F) adults 18–67 yr of age, active between 08:00±1 h and 23:00±1:30 h and free of alcohol, tobacco, and drug consumption volunteered. Data were gathered longitudinally at home and work 4–7 times daily for 11–20 d. At each test time the following variables were assessed: grip strength of both hands (Dynamometer: Colin–Gentile, Paris, France); single reaction time to a yellow signal (SRT); and CRT to randomized yellow, red, or green signal series with varying instruction from test to test (Psycholog-24: Biophyderm, France). Rhythms in the performance in SRT, CRT, and handgrip strength of both DH and NDH were explored. The sleep–wake rhythm was assessed by sleep-logs, and in a subset of 14 subjects it was also assessed by wrist actigraphy (Mini-Motionlogger: AMI, Ardsley NY). Exploration of the prominent period τ of time series was achieved by a special power spectra analysis for unequally spaced data. Cosinor analysis was used to quantify the rhythm amplitude A and rhythm-adjusted mean M of the power spectral analysis determined trial τ. A 24h sleep–wake rhythm was detected in almost all cases. In adults, a prominent τ of 24 h characterized the performance of the easy task by both the DH and NDH. In adults a prominent τ of 24 h was also detected in the complex CRT task performed by the DH, but for the NDH the τ was <24 h. This phenomenon was not gender-related but was age-related since it was seldom observed in adolescent subjects. Hand-side differences in the grip strength rhythms in the same individuals were detected, the τ being ultradian rather than circadian in adolescent subjects while in mature subjects the τ frequently differed from that of the rhythm in CRT. These findings further support the hypothesis that functional biological clocks exist in both the left and right hemispheres of the human cortex.     

Differences in Sleep,Light, and Circadian Phase in Offshore 18:00–06:00 h and 19:00–07:00 h Shift Workers

Complaints concerning sleep are high among those who work night shifts; this is in part due to the disturbed relationship between circadian phase and the timing of the sleep‐wake cycle. Shift schedule, light exposure, and age are all known to affect adaptation to the night shift. This study investigated circadian phase, sleep, and light exposure in subjects working 18:00–06:00 h and 19:00–07:00 h schedules during summer (May–August). Ten men, aged 46±10 yrs (mean±SD), worked the 19:00–07:00 h shift schedule for two or three weeks offshore (58°N). Seven men, mean age 41±12 yrs, worked the 18:00–06:00 h shift schedule for two weeks offshore (61°N). Circadian phase was assessed by calculating the peak (acrophase) of the 6‐sulphatoxymelatonin rhythm measured by radioimmunoassay of sequential urine samples collected for 72 h at the end of the night shift. Objective sleep and light exposure were assessed by actigraphy and subjective sleep diaries. Subjects working 18:00–06:00 h had a 6‐sulphatoxymelatonin acrophase of 11.7±0.77 h (mean±SEM, decimal hours), whereas it was significantly later, 14.6±0.55 h (p=0.01), for adapted subjects working 19:00–07:00 h. Two subjects did not adapt to the 19:00–07:00 h night shift (6‐sulphatoxymelatonin acrophases being 4.3±0.22 and 5.3±0.29 h). Actigraphy analysis of sleep duration showed significant differences (p=0.03), with a mean sleep duration for those working 19:00–07:00 h of 5.71±0.31 h compared to those working 18:00–06:00 h whose mean sleep duration was 6.64±0.33 h. There was a trend to higher morning light exposure (p=0.07) in the 19:00–07:00 h group. Circadian phase was later (delayed on average by 3 h) and objective sleep was shorter with the 19:00–07:00 h than the 18:00–06:00 h shift schedule. In these offshore conditions in summer, the earlier shift start and end time appears to favor daytime sleep.     

Sleep Deprivation Influences Diurnal Variation of Human Time Perception with Prefrontal Activity Change: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study

Human short-time perception shows diurnal variation. In general, short-time perception fluctuates in parallel with circadian clock parameters, while diurnal variation seems to be modulated by sleep deprivation per se. Functional imaging studies have reported that short-time perception recruits a neural network that includes subcortical structures, as well as cortical areas involving the prefrontal cortex (PFC). It has also been reported that the PFC is vulnerable to sleep deprivation, which has an influence on various cognitive functions. The present study is aimed at elucidating the influence of PFC vulnerability to sleep deprivation on short-time perception, using the optical imaging technique of functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Eighteen participants performed 10-s time production tasks before (at 21:00) and after (at 09:00) experimental nights both in sleep-controlled and sleep-deprived conditions in a 4-day laboratory-based crossover study. Compared to the sleep-controlled condition, one-night sleep deprivation induced a significant reduction in the produced time simultaneous with an increased hemodynamic response in the left PFC at 09:00. These results suggest that activation of the left PFC, which possibly reflects functional compensation under a sleep-deprived condition, is associated with alteration of short-time perception.     

Interindividual Differences in a Set of Biological Rhythms Documented During the High Arctic Summer (79°N) In Three Healthy Subjects

The High Arctic summer with its permanent sunlight provides a situation in which one of the natural synchronizers, the light-dark alternation, is minimal. During the summers of 1981 and 1982 three healthy right-handed geographers who were performing field studies in Svalbard as part of their own research volunteered to document, 4–6 times per 24 hr for respectively 63,141 and 147 days, a set of circadian rhythms: self-rated fatigue, oral temperature, grip strength of both hands, heart rate and times of awakening and retiring. Tests were performed before departure from France, in Svalbard (79°IN latitude) where their daily activities were often strenuous, and after returning to France. Time series were treated individually according to three methods: display of data as a function of time, cosinor analyses to quantify rhythm parameters, and spectral analyses to estimate component periods of rhythms. Circadian parameters such as period and acrophase of activity-rest, oral temperature and fatigue rhythms were not altered. On the other hand, the circadian rhythm in grip strength was altered: the period differed from 24 hr in one subject, while grip strength acrophase of the left, but not the right, hand of the other two subjects was phase shifted during the sojourn in Svalbard. A prominent circahemidian (about 12 hr) rhythm was observed in two subjects for their heart rate in Svalbard, while a prominent circadian rhythm (differing from exactly 24 hr) was observed in France associated with a small circahemidian component.     

Effects of sleep loss and circadian rhythm on executive inhibitory control in the Stroop and Simon tasks

This study assessed the influence of sleep loss and circadian rhythm on executive inhibitory control (i.e., the ability to inhibit conflicting response tendencies due to irrelevant information). Twelve ordinarily diurnally active, healthy young male participants performed the Stroop and the Simon task every 3?h in a 40-h constant routine protocol that comprised constant wakefulness under controlled behavioral and environmental conditions. In both tasks, overall performance showed clear circadian rhythm and sleep-loss effects. However, both Stroop and Simon interference remained unchanged across the 40?h of wakefulness, suggesting that neither cumulative sleep loss nor the circadian clock affects executive inhibitory control. The present findings challenge the widely held view that executive functions are especially vulnerable to the influence of sleep loss and circadian rhythm.     

Interindividual differences in a set of biological rhythms documented during the high arctic summer (79 degrees N) in three healthy subjects

The High Arctic summer with its permanent sunlight provides a situation in which one of the natural synchronizers, the light-dark alternation, is minimal. During the summers of 1981 and 1982 three healthy right-handed geographers who were performing field studies in Svalbard as part of their own research volunteered to document, 4-6 times per 24 hr for respectively 63,141 and 147 days, a set of circadian rhythms: self-rated fatigue, oral temperature, grip strength of both hands, heart rate and times of awakening and retiring. Tests were performed before departure from France, in Svalbard (79°IN latitude) where their daily activities were often strenuous, and after returning to France. Time series were treated individually according to three methods: display of data as a function of time, cosinor analyses to quantify rhythm parameters, and spectral analyses to estimate component periods of rhythms. Circadian parameters such as period and acrophase of activity-rest, oral temperature and fatigue rhythms were not altered. On the other hand, the circadian rhythm in grip strength was altered: the period differed from 24 hr in one subject, while grip strength acrophase of the left, but not the right, hand of the other two subjects was phase shifted during the sojourn in Svalbard. A prominent circahemidian (about 12 hr) rhythm was observed in two subjects for their heart rate in Svalbard, while a prominent circadian rhythm (differing from exactly 24 hr) was observed in France associated with a small circahemidian component.     

Euchronism,Allochronism, and Dyschronism: Is Internal Desynchronization of Human Circadian Rhythms a Sign of Illness?

The authors define a subject as euchronic when the circadian parameters—tau (τ=period), Ø (acrophse or peak time), A (amplitude), and M (MESOR=24 h rhythm‐adjusted mean)—of a set of circadian variables are within the confidence limits of appropriate reference values of healthy subjects (HS). We define internal desynchronization as a state in which the circadian τ of a set of rhythms differs from 24 h and when the τ of a given variable differs from that of other variables. Such a state was first observed in singly isolated HS without access to time cues and clues. Herein, data and analyses are presented demonstrating that internal desynchronization appears to be a rather common phenomenon in HS dwelling in their natural environment (i.e., in the presence of usual zeitgebers). This has been documented by longitudinal studies (n?15 days) of the circadian rhythm in sleep‐wakefulness, body temperature, right‐ and left‐hand‐grip strength, and reaction time involving a total of 246 HS and 134 shift workers (SW), with 45.5% showing good and 54.5% poor SW tolerance. The presence of internal desynchronization observed in SW was associated SW intolerance, with symptoms being sleep alteration/disturbances, sleeping‐pill dependence, persisting fatigue (asthenia), mood alteration, and digestive complaints. Internal desynchronization was also documented in groups of HS and tolerant SW, though it was almost the rule among the intolerant SW. The authors introduce two new terms: allochronism to describe the time organization of those SW who evidence internal desynchronization without detectable clinical symptoms, and dyschronism to describe the time organization of those SW who exhibit internal desynchrobization plus the symptoms of SW intolerance or medical illness. The condition of allochronism is not restricted only to SW tolerance, as it was detected in 112 HS without medical complains when exposed to various experimental conditions, including medications and placebos, sojourn in the high Arctic summer, intensive sport training, and task‐loaded cognitive performance testing. Dyschronism in SW who are sleep‐deprived is associated with persisting fatigue. An unpublished Gallup survey found that 47% of 2478 respondents experienced a state of asthenia during the previous 12 months, with symptoms mimicking those of SW intolerance. In one‐third of the cases, the origin of the asthenia was undetermined. Taking into account the high incidence of internal desynchronization found in past investigations and the clinical observation that sleep deprivation is a consequence of many acute and chronic medical conditions (nocturnal pain, nocturnal asthma, etc.), it is suggested that dyschronism may be responsible for the asthenia of unknown origin, at least for some persons. The interindividual (including sex‐related) variability in the propensity to exhibit an altered temporal organization, whether it be transient or persistent (i.e., reversible or non‐reversible) suggests the involvement of genetic factors. The Dian‐Circadian genetic model previously proposed by the authors seems pertinent to conceptualize and explain the various levels and output of internal desynchronization.     

Right- and left-brain hemisphere. Rhythm in reaction time to light signals is task-load-dependent: age,gender, and handgrip strength rhythm comparisons

In healthy mature subjects simple reaction time (SRT) to a single light signal (an easy task) is associated with a prominent rhythm with tau = 24 h of dominant (DH) as well as nondominant (NDH) hand performance, while three-choice reaction time (CRT), a complex task, is associated with tau = 24 h of the DH but tau < 24 h of the NDH. The aims of the study were to assess the influence of age and gender on the difference in tau of the NDH and DH, as it relates to the corresponding cortical hemisphere of the brain, in comparison to the rhythm in handgrip strength. Healthy subjects, 9 (5 M and 4 F) adolescents 10-16 yr of age and 15 (8 M and 7 F) adults 18-67 yr of age, active between 08:00 +/- 1 h and 23:00 +/- 1:30 h and free of alcohol, tobacco, and drug consumption volunteered. Data were gathered longitudinally at home and work 4-7 times daily for 11-20 d. At each test time the following variables were assessed: grip strength of both hands (Dynamometer: Colin-Gentile, Paris, France); single reaction time to a yellow signal (SRT); and CRT to randomized yellow, red, or green signal series with varying instruction from test to test (Psycholog-24: Biophyderm, France). Rhythms in the performance in SRT, CRT, and handgrip strength of both DH and NDH were explored. The sleep-wake rhythm was assessed by sleep-logs, and in a subset of 14 subjects it was also assessed by wrist actigraphy (Mini-Motionlogger: AMI, Ardsley NY). Exploration of the prominent period tau of time series was achieved by a special power spectra analysis for unequally spaced data. Cosinor analysis was used to quantify the rhythm amplitude A and rhythm-adjusted mean M of the power spectral analysis determined trial tau. A 24h sleep-wake rhythm was detected in almost all cases. In adults, a prominent tau of 24 h characterized the performance of the easy task by both the DH and NDH. In adults a prominent tau of 24 h was also detected in the complex CRT task performed by the DH, but for the NDH the tau was < 24 h. This phenomenon was not gender-related but was age-related since it was seldom observed in adolescent subjects. Hand-side differences in the grip strength rhythms in the same individuals were detected, the tau being ultradian rather than circadian in adolescent subjects while in mature subjects the tau frequently differed from that of the rhythm in CRT. These findings further support the hypothesis that functional biological clocks exist in both the left and right hemispheres of the human cortex.     

Sleepiness and Sleep in a Simulated “Six Hours On/Six Hours Off” Sea Watch System

Ships are operated around the clock using rapidly rotating shift schedules called sea watch systems. Sea watch systems may cause fatigue, in the same way as other irregular working time arrangements. The present study investigated subjective sleepiness and sleep duration in connection with a 6 h on/6 h off duty system. The study was performed in a bridge simulator, very similar to those found on ships. Twelve officers divided into two groups participated in the study that lasted 66 h. Half of the subjects started with the 06:00–12:00 h watch and the other half with the 12:00–18:00 h watch. The subjects alternated between off‐duty and on‐duty for the remainder of the experimental period. Approximately halfway through the experiment, the 12:00–18:00 h watch was divided into two 3 h watches/off‐duty periods. The effect of this was to reverse the on‐duty/off‐duty pattern between the two groups. This enabled all subjects to work the four possible watches (00:00–06:00 h, 06:00–12:00 h, 12:00–18:00 h, and 18:00–24:00 h) in an order that was essentially counterbalanced between groups. Ratings of sleepiness (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale; KSS) were obtained every 30 min during on‐duty periods and if subjects were awake during off‐duty periods. The subjectively rated duration of sleep was recorded after each off‐duty period that preceded watch periods when KSS was rated. The results showed that the average level of sleepiness was significantly higher during the 00:00–06:00 h watch compared to the 12:00–18:00 h and 18:00–24:00 h watches, but not to the 06:00–12:00 h watch. Sleepiness also progressed significantly from the start toward the end of each watch, with the exception of the 06:00‐12:00 h watch, when levels remained approximately stable. There were no differences between groups (i.e., the order between watches). Sleep duration during the 06:00–12:00 h off‐duty period (3 h 29 min) was significantly longer than during the 12:00–18:00 h period (1 h 47 min) and the 18:00–24:00 h period (2 h 7 min). Sleep during the 00:00–06:00 h period (4 h 23 min) was longer than all sleep periods except the 06:00–12:00 h period. There were no differences between groups. In spite of sufficient opportunities for sleep, sleep was on the average around 1–1 h 30 min shorter than the 7–7 h 30 min that is considered “normal” during a 24 h period. This is probably a consequence of the difficulty to sleep during daytime due to the alerting effects of the circadian rhythm. Also, sleepiness during the night and early mornings reached high levels, which may be explained by a combination of working close to or during the circadian trough of alertness and the relatively short sleep periods obtained. An initial suppression of sleepiness was observed during all watches, except for the 06:00–12:00 h watch. This suppression may be explained by the “masking effect” exerted by the relative high levels of activity required when taking over the responsibility of the ship. Toward the end of watches, the levels of sleepiness progressively increased to relatively high levels, at least during the 00:00–06:00 h watch. Presumably, initially high levels of activity are replaced by routine and even boredom.     

The Circadian Body Temperature Rhythm in the Elderly: Effect of Single Daily Melatonin Dosing

The present study is part of a more extensive investigation dedicated to the study and treatment of age‐dependent changes/disturbances in the circadian system in humans. It was performed in the Tyumen Elderly Veteran House and included 97 subjects of both genders, ranging from 63 to 91 yrs of age. They lived a self‐chosen sleep‐wake regimen to suit their personal convenience. The experiment lasted 3 wks. After 1 control week, part of the group (n=63) received 1.5 mg melatonin (Melaxen?) daily at 22:30 h for 2 wks. The other 34 subjects were given placebo. Axillary temperature was measured using calibrated mercury thermometers at 03:00, 08:00, 11:00, 14:00, 17:00, and 23:00 h each of the first and third week. Specially trained personnel took the measurements, avoiding disturbing the sleep of the subjects. To evaluate age‐dependent changes, data obtained under similar conditions on 58 young adults (both genders, 17 to 39 yrs of age) were used. Rhythm characteristics were estimated by means of cosinor analyses, and intra‐ and inter‐individual variability by analysis of variance (ANOVA). In both age groups, the body temperature underwent daily changes. The MESOR (36.38±0.19°C vs. 36.17±0.21°C) and circadian amplitude (0.33±0.01°C vs. 0.26±0.01°C) were slightly decreased in the elderly compared to the young adult subjects (p<0.001). The mean circadian acrophase was similar in both age groups (17.19±1.66 vs. 16.93±3.08 h). However, the inter‐individual differences were higher in the older group, with individual values varying between 10:00 and 23:00 h. It was mainly this phase variability that caused a decrease in the inter‐daily rhythm stability and lower group amplitude. With melatonin treatment, the MESOR was lower by 0.1°C and the amplitude increased to 0.34±0.01°C, a similar value to that found in young adults. This was probably due to the increase of the inter‐daily rhythm stability. The mean acrophase did not change (16.93 vs. 16.75 h), although the inter‐individual variability decreased considerably. The corresponding standard deviations (SD) of the group acrophases were 3.08 and 1.51 h (p<0.01). A highly significant correlation between the acrophase before treatment and the phase change under melatonin treatment indicates that this is due to a synchronizing effect of melatonin. Apart from the difference in MESOR, the body temperature rhythm in the elderly subjects undergoing melatonin treatment was not significantly different from that of young adults. The data clearly show that age‐dependent changes mainly concern rhythm stability and synchronization with the 24 h day. A single daily melatonin dose stabilizes/synchronizes the body temperature rhythm, most probably via hypothermic and sleep‐improving effects.     

Sleep, performance, circadian rhythms, and light-dark cycles during two space shuttle flights

Sleep, circadian rhythm, and neurobehavioral performance measures were obtained in five astronauts before, during, and after 16-day or 10-day space missions. In space, scheduled rest-activity cycles were 20-35 min shorter than 24 h. Light-dark cycles were highly variable on the flight deck, and daytime illuminances in other compartments of the spacecraft were very low (5.0-79.4 lx). In space, the amplitude of the body temperature rhythm was reduced and the circadian rhythm of urinary cortisol appeared misaligned relative to the imposed non-24-h sleep-wake schedule. Neurobehavioral performance decrements were observed. Sleep duration, assessed by questionnaires and actigraphy, was only approximately 6.5 h/day. Subjective sleep quality diminished. Polysomnography revealed more wakefulness and less slow-wave sleep during the final third of sleep episodes. Administration of melatonin (0.3 mg) on alternate nights did not improve sleep. After return to earth, rapid eye movement (REM) sleep was markedly increased. Crewmembers on these flights experienced circadian rhythm disturbances, sleep loss, decrements in neurobehavioral performance, and postflight changes in REM sleep.