Comparison of the efficacy of morning versus evening administration of olmesartan in uncomplicated essential hypertension

A total of 18 diurnally active subjects with uncomplicated, mild to moderate, essential hypertension were studied to compare the efficacy of the morning versus evening administration of an oral olmesartan medication. After a two-week, wash-out/placebo run-in period, subjects with clinic diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > or = 90 mm Hg and <110 mm Hg began 12 weeks of 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil tablet therapy at 08:00 h daily. Four of the 18 subjects required dose escalation to 40 mg at eight weeks because of clinic DBP > or = 90 mm Hg. After the 12-week period of once-a-day 08:00 h treatment, subjects were immediately switched to an evening (20:00 h) drug-ingestion schedule for another 12-week period without change in dose. Subjects underwent 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) before the initiation of morning treatment and at the end of both the 12-week morning and evening treatment arms. Dosing time did not exert statistically significant differences on the efficacy of olmesartan: the reduction from baseline in the 24 h mean systolic (SBP) and DBP was, respectively, 18.8 and 14.6 mm Hg with morning dosing and 16.1 and 13.2 mm Hg with evening dosing (p>0.152 between groups). The amplitude of the BP 24 h pattern did not vary with dosing time, indicating full 24 h BP reduction no matter the clock hour of treatment. Although, the BP-lowering effect was somewhat better with morning dosing, the results of this study suggest that the studied olmesartan medoxomil preparation efficiently reduces BP when ingested in the morning (08:00 h) or evening (20:00 h) in equivalent manner, based on statistical testing, throughout the 24 h.     

WORKING THE NIGHT SHIFT CAUSES INCREASED VASCULAR STRESS AND DELAYED RECOVERY IN YOUNG WOMEN

Shiftwork has been associated with elevated blood pressure (BP) and decreased heart-rate variability (HRV), factors that may increase the long-term risk of cardiovascular-related mortality and morbidity. This study explored the effect of shiftwork on dynamic changes in autonomic control of HRV (cardiac stress), systolic BP and diastolic BP, i.e., SBP and DBP (vascular stress), and recovery in the same subjects working different shifts. By studying the same subjects, the authors could reduce the effect of possible contribution of between-subject variation from genetic predisposition and environmental factors. The authors recruited 16 young female nurses working rotating shifts—day (08:00–16:00 h), evening (16:00–00:00 h), and night (00:00–08:00 h)—and 6 others working the regular day shift. Each nurse received simultaneous and repeated 48-h ambulatory electrocardiography and BP monitoring during their work day and the following off-duty day. Using a linear mixed-effect model to adjust for day shift, the results of the repeated-measurements and self-comparisons found significant shift differences in vascular stress. While working the night shift, the nurses showed significant increases in vascular stress, with increased SBP of 9.7 mm Hg. The changes of SBP and DBP seemed to peak during waking time at the same time on the day off as they did on the working day. Whereas HRV profiles usually returned to baseline level after each shift, the SBP and DBP of night-shift workers did not completely return to baseline levels the following off-duty day (p?<?.001). The authors concluded that although the nurses may recover from cardiac stress the first day off following a night shift, they do not completely recover from increases in vascular stress on that day. (Author correspondence: jdwang@ntu.edu.tw)     

Administration‐Time‐Dependent Effects of Olmesartan on the Ambulatory Blood Pressure of Essential Hypertension Patients

Previous studies established that a single daily dose of olmesartan remains effective for the entire 24 h without alteration of the day‐night blood pressure (BP) pattern. On the other hand, the administration of valsartan or telmisartan at bedtime, as opposed to upon wakening, improves the sleep‐time relative BP decline toward a greater dipper pattern without loss of 24 h efficacy. Yet to be determined is whether this administration‐time‐dependent efficacy is a class‐related feature, characteristic of all angiotensin‐receptor‐blocker (ARB) medications. We studied 123 grade 1 and 2 hypertensive patients, 46.6±12.3 yrs of age, randomly assigned to receive olmesartan (20 mg/day) as a monotherapy either upon awakening or at bedtime for three months. BP was measured by ambulatory monitoring for 48 consecutive hours before and after treatment. The 24 h BP reduction was similar for both treatment times. Administration of olmesartan at bedtime, however, was significantly more efficient than morning administration in reducing the nocturnal BP mean. The sleep‐time relative BP decline was slightly reduced with olmesartan ingestion upon awakening but significantly increased with ingestion at bedtime, thus reducing the prevalence of non‐dipping from baseline by 48%. Olmesartan administration at bedtime, as opposed to in the morning, improved the awake/asleep BP ratio toward a greater dipper pattern without loss of 24 h efficacy. Nocturnal BP regulation was significantly better achieved with bedtime as compared to morning dosing of olmesartan. These effects are comparable to those previously reported for valsartan and telmisartan, thus suggesting that they may be class‐related features of ARB medications in spite of differences in their half‐life kinetics. These administration‐time‐dependent effects should be taken into account when prescribing ARB medications for treatment of essential hypertension     

Administration Time‐Dependent Effects of Valsartan on Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Elderly Hypertensive Subjects

Previous results have indicated that valsartan administration at bed‐time, as opposed to upon wakening, improves the diurnal/nocturnal ratio of blood pressure (BP) toward a normal dipping pattern, without loss of 24 h efficacy. This ratio is characterized by a progressive decrease with aging. Accordingly, we investigated the administration time‐dependent antihypertensive efficacy of valsartan, an angiotensin blocking agent, in elderly hypertensive patients. We studied 100 elderly patients with grade 1–2 essential hypertension (34 men and 66 women), 68.2±4.9 years of age, randomly assigned to receive valsartan (160 mg/d) as a monotherapy either upon awakening or at bed‐time. BP was measured for 48 h by ambulatory monitoring, at 20 min intervals between 07∶00 to 23∶00 h and at 30 min intervals at night, before and after 3 months of therapy. Physical activity was simultaneously monitored every minute by wrist actigraphy to accurately determine the duration of sleep and wake spans to enable the accurate calculation of the diurnal and nocturnal means of BP for each subject. There was a highly significant BP reduction after 3 months of valsartan treatment (p<0.001). The reduction was slightly larger with bed‐time dosing (15.3 and 9.2 mm Hg reduction in the 24 h mean of systolic and diastolic BP, respectively) than with morning dosing (12.3 and 6.3 mm Hg reduction in the 24 h mean of systolic and diastolic BP, respectively). The diurnal/nocturnal ratio, measured as the nocturnal decline of BP relative to the diurnal mean, was unchanged in the group ingesting valsartan upon awakening (?1.0 and ?0.3 for systolic and diastolic BP; p>0.195). This ratio was significantly increased (6.6 and 5.4 for systolic and diastolic BP; p<0.001) when valsartan was ingested at bed‐time. The reduction of the nocturnal mean was doubled in the group ingesting valsartan at bed‐time, as compared to the group ingesting it in the morning (p<0.001). In elderly hypertensive patients, mainly characterized by a diminished nocturnal decline in BP, bed‐time valsartan dosing is better than morning dosing since it improves efficacy during the nighttime sleep span, with the potential reduction in cardiovascular risk that has been associated with a normalized diurnal/nocturnal BP ratio.     

Administration time-dependent effects of valsartan on ambulatory blood pressure in elderly hypertensive subjects

Previous results have indicated that valsartan administration at bed-time, as opposed to upon wakening, improves the diurnal/nocturnal ratio of blood pressure (BP) toward a normal dipping pattern, without loss of 24 h efficacy. This ratio is characterized by a progressive decrease with aging. Accordingly, we investigated the administration time-dependent antihypertensive efficacy of valsartan, an angiotensin blocking agent, in elderly hypertensive patients. We studied 100 elderly patients with grade 1-2 essential hypertension (34 men and 66 women), 68.2+/-4.9 years of age, randomly assigned to receive valsartan (160 mg/d) as a monotherapy either upon awakening or at bed-time. BP was measured for 48 h by ambulatory monitoring, at 20 min intervals between 07:00 to 23:00 h and at 30 min intervals at night, before and after 3 months of therapy. Physical activity was simultaneously monitored every minute by wrist actigraphy to accurately determine the duration of sleep and wake spans to enable the accurate calculation of the diurnal and nocturnal means of BP for each subject. There was a highly significant BP reduction after 3 months of valsartan treatment (p < 0.001). The reduction was slightly larger with bed-time dosing (15.3 and 9.2 mm Hg reduction in the 24 h mean of systolic and diastolic BP, respectively) than with morning dosing (12.3 and 6.3 mm Hg reduction in the 24 h mean of systolic and diastolic BP, respectively). The diurnal/nocturnal ratio, measured as the nocturnal decline of BP relative to the diurnal mean, was unchanged in the group ingesting valsartan upon awakening (-1.0 and -0.3 for systolic and diastolic BP; p > 0.195). This ratio was significantly increased (6.6 and 5.4 for systolic and diastolic BP; p < 0.001) when valsartan was ingested at bed-time. The reduction of the nocturnal mean was doubled in the group ingesting valsartan at bed-time, as compared to the group ingesting it in the morning (p < 0.001). In elderly hypertensive patients, mainly characterized by a diminished nocturnal decline in BP, bed-time valsartan dosing is better than morning dosing since it improves efficacy during the nighttime sleep span, with the potential reduction in cardiovascular risk that has been associated with a normalized diurnal/nocturnal BP ratio.     

MORNING-EVENING ADMINISTRATION TIME DIFFERENCES IN DIGOXIN KINETICS IN HEALTHY YOUNG SUBJECTS

Digoxin, frequently used in the treatment of congestive heart failure, has a very narrow therapeutic index. We studied the differences in digoxin pharmacokinetics when ingested in the morning versus evening. A single digoxin (0.25 mg) dose was given orally to the same group of 10 diurnally active healthy (6 male and 4 female) volunteers in the morning at 08:00 and evening at 20:00 in separate experiments scheduled 2 weeks apart. Blood samples were collected at specific times for 48h after each timed dose; digoxin was determined by radioimmunoassay (RIA). Maximum plasma concentration C_max; T_max, the time to reach C_max; area under plasma concentration curve AUC; and elimination half-time T_1/2 of digoxin were determined. T_max was statistically significantly shorter (54 min) following 08:00 dosing compared to 20:00 dosing (96 min). Although the C_max was higher after morning than evening dosing, it was not significantly so. No other parameter of digoxin pharmacokinetics except T_max exhibited administration time dependency. (Chronobiology International, 18(5), 841-849, 2001)     

Morning‐to‐Evening Differences in Oxygen Uptake Kinetics in Short‐Duration Cycling Exercise

This study analyzed diurnal variations in oxygen (O₂) uptake kinetics and efficiency during a moderate cycle ergometer exercise. Fourteen physically active diurnally active male subjects (age 23±5 yrs) not specifically trained at cycling first completed a test to determine their ventilatory threshold (T_vent) and maximal oxygen consumption (VO_2max); one week later, they completed four bouts of testing in the morning and evening in a random order, each separated by at least 24 h. For each period of the day (07:00–08:30 h and 19:00–20:30 h), subjects performed two bouts. Each bout was composed of a 5 min cycling exercise at 45 W, followed after 5 min rest by a 10 min cycling exercise at 80% of the power output associated with T_vent. Gas exchanges were analyzed breath‐by‐breath and fitted using a mono‐exponential function. During moderate exercise, the time constant and amplitude of VO₂ kinetics were significantly higher in the morning compared to the evening. The net efficiency increased from the morning to evening (17.3±4 vs. 20.5±2%; p<0.05), and the variability of cycling cadence was greater during the morning than evening (+34%; p<0.05). These findings suggest that VO₂ responses are affected by the time of day and could be related to variability in muscle activity pattern.     

Morning-to-evening differences in oxygen uptake kinetics in short-duration cycling exercise

This study analyzed diurnal variations in oxygen (O(2)) uptake kinetics and efficiency during a moderate cycle ergometer exercise. Fourteen physically active diurnally active male subjects (age 23+/-5 yrs) not specifically trained at cycling first completed a test to determine their ventilatory threshold (T(vent)) and maximal oxygen consumption (VO(2max)); one week later, they completed four bouts of testing in the morning and evening in a random order, each separated by at least 24 h. For each period of the day (07:00-08:30 h and 19:00-20:30 h), subjects performed two bouts. Each bout was composed of a 5 min cycling exercise at 45 W, followed after 5 min rest by a 10 min cycling exercise at 80% of the power output associated with T(vent). Gas exchanges were analyzed breath-by-breath and fitted using a mono-exponential function. During moderate exercise, the time constant and amplitude of VO(2) kinetics were significantly higher in the morning compared to the evening. The net efficiency increased from the morning to evening (17.3+/-4 vs. 20.5+/-2%; p<0.05), and the variability of cycling cadence was greater during the morning than evening (+34%; p<0.05). These findings suggest that VO(2) responses are affected by the time of day and could be related to variability in muscle activity pattern.     

Post‐Exercise Blood Pressure Reduction Is Greater Following Intermittent Than Continuous Exercise and Is Influenced Less by Diurnal Variation

Recently, we reported that circadian variation exists in the response of blood pressure (BP) following a bout of uninterrupted exercise. The usual phenomenon of post‐exercise hypotension was absent or reversed when such exercise was performed between 04:00–08:00 h. Nevertheless, research examining BP changes following bouts of intermittent exercise at different times of the day is scarce, even though this type of activity is probably more popular. Therefore, we aimed to compare post‐exercise BP reductions of continuous (CONT) and intermittent (INT) exercise protocols performed at 08:00 h and 16:00 h. At both of these times of day, eight normotensive males completed 30 min of continuous cycling in the CONT and three 10 min bouts of cycling separated by 10 min of rest in the INT protocol. The exercise intensity was set at 70% V˙O_2peak during both protocols. Heart rate, systolic (S) and diastolic (D) BP, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured 5 min before and 20 min after exercise. Changes from pre‐exercise baseline were analyzed using linear mixed modeling. MAP was 8±1 mm Hg lower following INT compared with CONT exercise (p<0.05). SBP and DBP were also significantly lower following INT compared with CONT exercise (p<0.05). Diurnal variation in MAP was evident, with attenuated hypotension being observed after morning exercise (p<0.05), although this diurnal variation was less marked following INT compared with CONT exercise (p<0.05). We conclude that intermittent exercise mediates greater post‐exercise hypotension compared with a single continuous bout of equivalent work and that this protocol‐dependent difference is greatest in the afternoon. Therefore, a bout of afternoon exercise that is occasionally interrupted with short rest periods is recommended for lowering BP acutely.     

MORNING-EVENING ADMINISTRATION TIME DIFFERENCES IN DIGOXIN KINETICS IN HEALTHY YOUNG SUBJECTS

Digoxin, frequently used in the treatment of congestive heart failure, has a very narrow therapeutic index. We studied the differences in digoxin pharmacokinetics when ingested in the morning versus evening. A single digoxin (0.25 mg) dose was given orally to the same group of 10 diurnally active healthy (6 male and 4 female) volunteers in the morning at 08:00 and evening at 20:00 in separate experiments scheduled 2 weeks apart. Blood samples were collected at specific times for 48h after each timed dose; digoxin was determined by radioimmunoassay (RIA). Maximum plasma concentration C_max; T_max, the time to reach C_max; area under plasma concentration curve AUC; and elimination half-time T_1/2 of digoxin were determined. T_max was statistically significantly shorter (54 min) following 08:00 dosing compared to 20:00 dosing (96 min). Although the C_max was higher after morning than evening dosing, it was not significantly so. No other parameter of digoxin pharmacokinetics except T_max exhibited administration time dependency. (Chronobiology International, 18(5), 841–849, 2001)     

Differences Between Men and Women in Ambulatory Blood Pressure Thresholds for Diagnosis of Hypertension Based on Cardiovascular Outcomes

Previous studies have reported sex differences in the pathophysiology of hypertension and responses to blood pressure (BP)-lowering medications. Moreover, men exhibit typically higher BP than women, the differences being greater for systolic (SBP) than diastolic (DBP) BP. These differences become apparent during adolescence and remain significant at least until 55–60 yrs of age. Despite such significant sex-related differences in BP regulation, the current recommended ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) thresholds for diagnosis of hypertension do not differentiate between men and women. We aimed to derive separate male and female diagnostic thresholds for the awake and asleep SBP and DBP means based upon cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcome. We prospectively studied 3344 subjects (1718 men/1626 women), 52.6?±?14.5 yrs of age, during a median follow-up of 5.6 yrs. Those with hypertension at baseline were randomized to ingest all their prescribed hypertension medications upon awakening or the entire daily dose of ≥1 of them at bedtime. At baseline, BP was measured at 20-min intervals from 07:00 to 23:00?h and at 30-min intervals at night for 48?h, and physical activity was simultaneously monitored every minute by wrist actigraphy to accurately derive the awake and asleep BP means. Identical assessment was scheduled annually and more frequently (quarterly) if treatment adjustment was required. Cox regression analysis was used to derive outcome-based reference thresholds for ABPM in men and women. Men exhibited greater event rates than women of CVD death, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, coronary revascularization, and heart failure; however, event rates of non-CVD death and cerebrovascular events were comparable. The relationship between progressively higher ambulatory BP and CVD risk increased more rapidly in women than men for awake SBP/DBP means ≥125/75?mm Hg and asleep means ≥110/70?mm Hg. The derived outcome-based reference thresholds for men were 135/85?mm Hg for the awake and 120/70?mm Hg for the asleep SBP/DBP means. In terms of CVD outcome, the equivalent cutoff threshold values for women were 125/80?mm Hg for the awake and 110/65?mm Hg for the asleep SBP/DBP means. Outcome-based reference thresholds for the diagnosis of hypertension were 10/5?mm Hg lower for ambulatory SBP/DBP in women than men. This marked sex difference indicates the need for revision of current guidelines that propose diagnostic thresholds for ambulatory BP without differentiation between men and women. (Author correspondence: rhermida@uvigo.es)     

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Thresholds for Diagnosis of Hypertension in Patients With and Without Type 2 Diabetes Based on Cardiovascular Outcomes

Currently recommended ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) thresholds for diagnosis of hypertension do not differentiate, as international guidelines do for clinic BP, uncomplicated persons at low risk from those at higher risk, e.g., patients with diabetes, for target injury and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. We aimed to derive diagnostic thresholds for the awake and asleep systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP means based upon CVD outcomes (death from all causes, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, coronary revascularization, heart failure, acute arterial occlusion of the lower extremities, thrombotic occlusion of the retinal artery, hemorrhagic stroke, ischemic stroke, and transient ischemic attack) for patients with and without diabetes. We prospectively studied 3344 subjects (1718 men/1626 women), 52.6?±?14.5 (mean?±?SD) yrs of age, 607 with type 2 diabetes, during a median follow-up of 5.6 yrs. Those with hypertension at baseline were randomized to ingest all their prescribed hypertension medications upon awakening or the entire daily dose of ≥1 of them at bedtime. At baseline, BP was measured at 20-min intervals from 07:00 to 23:00?h and at 30-min intervals at night for 48?h, and physical activity was simultaneously monitored every minute by wrist actigraphy to accurately derive the awake and asleep BP means. Identical assessment was scheduled annually and more frequently (quarterly) if treatment adjustment was required. Cox regression analysis was used to derive outcome-based reference thresholds for ABPM in subjects with and without diabetes. CVD risk was consistently greater in patients with than without diabetes for awake SBP/DBP means ≥130/75?mm Hg and asleep means ≥110/65?mm Hg. Derived outcome-based reference thresholds for persons without diabetes were 135/85?mm Hg for the awake and 120/70?mm Hg for the asleep SBP/DBP means. In terms of CVD outcome, the equivalent cutoff threshold values for patients with diabetes were 120/75?mm Hg for the awake and 105/60?mm Hg for the asleep SBP/DBP means. Outcome-based reference thresholds for the diagnosis of hypertension were 15/10?mm Hg lower for ambulatory SBP/DBP in patients with than without diabetes. This marked difference indicates the need for revision of current guidelines that propose diagnostic thresholds for ambulatory BP without differentiation between the presence/absence of diabetes. (Author correspondence: rhermida@uvigo.es)     

Administration-Time Differences in Effects of Hypertension Medications on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Regulation

Specific features of the 24-h blood pressure (BP) pattern are linked to progressive injury of target tissues and risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. Several studies have consistently shown an association between blunted asleep BP decline and risk of fatal and nonfatal CVD events. Thus, there is growing focus on ways to properly control BP during nighttime sleep as well as during daytime activity. One strategy, termed chronotherapy, entails the timing of hypertension medications to endogenous circadian rhythm determinants of the 24-h BP pattern. Significant and clinically meaningful treatment-time differences in the beneficial and/or adverse effects of at least six different classes of hypertension medications, and their combinations, are now known. Generally, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are more effective with bedtime than morning dosing, and for dihydropyridine derivatives bedtime dosing significantly reduces risk of peripheral edema. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is highly circadian rhythmic and activates during nighttime sleep. Accordingly, evening/bedtime ingestion of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) benazepril, captopril, enalapril, lisinopril, perindopril, quinapril, ramipril, spirapril, trandolapril, and zofenopril exerts more marked effect on the asleep than awake systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP means. Likewise, the bedtime, in comparison with morning, ingestion schedule of the angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs irbesartan, olmesartan, telmisartan, and valsartan exerts greater therapeutic effect on asleep BP, plus significant increase in the sleep-time relative BP decline, with the additional benefit, independent of drug terminal half-life, of converting the 24-h BP profile into a more normal dipping pattern. This is the case also for the bedtime versus upon-awakening regimen of combination ARB-CCB, ACEI-CCB, and ARB-diuretic medications. The chronotherapy of conventional hypertension medications constitutes a new and cost-effective strategy for enhancing the control of daytime and nighttime SBP and DBP levels, normalizing the dipping status of their 24-h patterning, and potentially reducing the risk of CVD events and end-organ injury, for example, of the blood vessels and tissues of the heart, brain, kidney, and retina. (Author correspondence: rhermida@uvigo.es)     

Effect of imidapril in dipper and nondipper hypertensive patients: comparison between morning and evening administration

The purpose of the study was to identify differences in the patterns of efficacy and duration of effects of imidapril administered at different times of the day (morning versus evening) in dipper and nondipper hypertensive patients. Twenty patients with untreated hypertension were classified into two groups: dippers (n = 9) and nondippers (n = 11). Imidapril (10 mg) was given at 07:00 or 18:00 for 4 weeks in a crossover fashion. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were monitored before and after morning and evening treatment every 30 min for 48h by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). In dipper hypertension, the mean 48h BP was reduced with both doses. The decrease in the diurnal BP was stronger when the drug was administered in the evening than morning, but without significant difference. In nondipper hypertension, the systolic BP decreased at night with both doses, but the extent of the nocturnal reduction in systolic BP was greater after morning therapy. There were no significant differences in the decrease in BP during the day or night between the morning and evening administrations. When imidapril was administered in the morning, its serum concentration reached a maximum at 16:00, and when the drug was administered in the evening, it reached a maximum at 6:00. In dipper hypertension, the time taken for the blood concentration of imidapril to reach a maximum changed depending on its time of administration, and the time when the maximum antihypertensive effect of the drug appeared was different. In nondipper hypertension, decreases in the BP were confirmed at night regardless of the time of administration; this might be caused by angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors effectively blocking the BP from increasing by activating the parasympathetic nervous system. Therefore, when assessing the effectiveness of antihypertensive agents, factors such as the various patterns of BP before therapy and administration time must be considered.     

Chronopharmacological Study of Cephalexin in Dogs

Recent studies have identified a 24 h rhythm in the expression and function of PEPT1 in rats, with significantly higher levels during the nighttime than daytime. Similarly, temporal variations have been described in glomerular filtration rate and renal blood flow, both being maximal during the activity phase and minimal during the rest phase in laboratory rodents. The aim of this study was to assess the hypothesis that the absorption of the first‐generation cephalosporin antibiotic cephalexin by dogs would be less and the elimination would be slower after evening (rest span) compared to morning (activity span) administration, and whether such administration‐time changes could impair the medication's predicted clinical efficacy. Six (3 male, 3 female; age 4.83±3.12 years) healthy beagle dogs were studied. Each dog received a single dose of 25 mg/kg of cephalexin monohydrate per os at 10∶00 and 22∶00 h, with a two‐week interval of time between the two clock‐time experiments. Plasma cephalexin concentrations were determined by microbiological assay. Cephalexin peak plasma concentration was significantly reduced to almost 77% of its value after the evening compared to morning (14.52±2.7 vs. 18.77±2.8 µg/mL) administration. The elimination half‐life was prolonged 1.5‐fold after the 22∶00 h compared to the 10∶00 h administration (2.69±0.9 vs. 1.79±0.2 h). The area under the curve and time to reach peak plasma concentration did not show significant administration‐time differences. The duration of time that cephalexin concentrations remained above the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for staphylococci susceptiblity (MIC=0.5 µg/mL) was>70% of each of the 12 h dosing intervals (i.e., 10∶00 and 22∶00 h). It can be concluded that cephalexin pharmacokinetics vary with time of day administration. The findings of this acute single‐dose study require confirmation by future steady‐state, multiple‐dose studies. If such studies are confirmatory, no administration‐time dose adjustment is required to ensure drug efficacy in dogs receiving an oral suspension of cephalexin in a dosage of 25 mg/kg at 12 h intervals.     

Variability in the Period of the Blood Pressure Orcadian Rhythm in Human Beings

In studies and assessments of human beings done in natural settings, it is assumed that the period τ of circadian rhythms, including ones of systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure, is equal to 24 hours. To test this hypothesis, SBP and DBP rhythms were studied in 112 medication-free, non-hospitalized subjects (62 males, 47.1 + 2.0 years [χ ± SEM], and 50 females, 54.5 ± 2.1 years) by 48h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Of these, 26 were hypertensive (diurnal SBP> 140 mmHg and diurnal DBP> 90 mmHg) and 86 normotensive. All subjects were synchronized by their habitual daytime activities from ?08:00h to ?23:00h ± lh and by sleep at night. The BP was assessed at 15-minute intervals during a continuous 48h span using a Spacelabs model #90207 ABPM. The time series data of each subject were individually evaluated by power spectra analysis for the prominent x of the SBP and DBP rhythms. The prominent X differed from 24 hours in 22/112 subjects for SBP and in 16/112 subjects for DBP. Generally, in these individuals the τ was less than 24 hours. The occurrence of non-24h τ's was more frequent in hypertensive than normotensive subjects; the difference between the groups in the distribution of the prominent τ's by class (τ = 24h, >=12, 12h<24h, etc.) was statistically significant (χ² test =19.1; p < 0.001). No difference in the distribution of x's of blood pressure was detected according to the subject's age and gender. These findings suggest that ABPM done only for a duration of 24h may be too short to characterize accurately the features of the day-night variation in human BP, including the precise period of its rhythm. (Chronobiology International, 14(3), 307–317, 1997)     

Effect of Evening Exposure to Dim or Bright Light on the Digestion of Carbohydrate in the Supper Meal

In a previous study we found that daytime exposure to bright as compared to dim light exerted a beneficial effect on the digestion of the evening meal. This finding prompted us to examine whether the digestion of the evening meal is also affected by evening light intensity. Subjects lived in light of 200 lux during the daytime (08:00–17:00 h) and took their evening meal at 17:00 h under 20 lux (evening dim‐light condition: 17:00–02:00 h) or 2000 lux (evening bright‐light condition: 17:00–02:00 h) until retiring at 02:00 h. Assessment of carbohydrate digestion of the evening meal was accomplished by a breath hydrogen test that is indicative of the malabsorption of dietary carbohydrate. Hydrogen excretion in the breath in the evening under the dim‐light condition was significantly less than under the bright‐light condition (p < 0.05). This finding is the opposite to that obtained in previous experiments in which subjects were exposed to the different intensities of light during the daytime, and indicates that the exposure to dim light in the evening exerts a better effect on carbohydrate digestion in the evening meal than does the exposure to bright light.     

EFFECT OF IMIDAPRIL IN DIPPER AND NONDIPPER HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS: COMPARISON BETWEEN MORNING AND EVENING ADMINISTRATION

The purpose of the study was to identify differences in the patterns of efficacy and duration of effects of imidapril administered at different times of the day (morning versus evening) in dipper and nondipper hypertensive patients. Twenty patients with untreated hypertension were classified into two groups: dippers (n = 9) and nondippers (n = 11). Imidapril (10 mg) was given at 07:00 or 18:00 for 4 weeks in a crossover fashion. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were monitored before and after morning and evening treatment every 30 min for 48h by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). In dipper hypertension, the mean 48h BP was reduced with both doses. The decrease in the diurnal BP was stronger when the drug was administered in the evening than morning, but without significant difference. In nondipper hypertension, the systolic BP decreased at night with both doses, but the extent of the nocturnal reduction in systolic BP was greater after morning therapy. There were no significant differences in the decrease in BP during the day or night between the morning and evening administrations. When imidapril was administered in the morning, its serum concentration reached a maximum at 16:00, and when the drug was administered in the evening, it reached a maximum at 6:00. In dipper hypertension, the time taken for the blood concentration of imidapril to reach a maximum changed depending on its time of administration, and the time when the maximum antihypertensive effect of the drug appeared was different. In nondipper hypertension, decreases in the BP were confirmed at night regardless of the time of administration; this might be caused by angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors effectively blocking the BP from increasing by activating the parasympathetic nervous system. Therefore, when assessing the effectiveness of antihypertensive agents, factors such as the various patterns of BP before therapy and administration time must be considered. (Chronobiology International, 17(2), 209–219, 2000)     

Effect of Ramadan on the Diurnal Variation in Short‐Term High Power Output

This study examined the effects of Ramadan fasting on anaerobic performances and their diurnal fluctuations. In a balanced and randomized study design, 12 subjects were measured for maximal power (P_max; force‐velocity test), peak power (P_peak), and mean power (P_mean) with the Wingate test at 07:00, 17:00, and 21:00 h on four different occasions: one week before Ramadan (BR), the second week of Ramadan (SWR), the fourth week of Ramadan (ER), and two weeks after Ramadan (AR). There was an interval of 28 h between any two successive tests. Oral temperature was measured before each test. Under each condition, the results showed a time‐of‐day effect on oral temperature. Analysis of variance revealed a significant (Ramadan×time‐of‐day of test) interaction effect on P_max. This variable improved significantly from morning to evening before Ramadan (1.1±0.2 W · kg^?1), during the second week of Ramadan (0.6±0.2 W · kg^?1), and two weeks after the end of Ramadan (0.9±0.2 W · kg^?1). However, daily fluctuations disappeared during the fourth week of Ramadan. For P_peak and P_mean, there was no significant Ramadan×test‐time interaction. These variables improved significantly from morning to evening before Ramadan ([1±0.3 W · kg^?1] for P_peak and [1.7±1.6 W · kg^?1] for P_mean) and in the second week of Ramadan ([0.9±0.6 W · kg^?1] for P_peak and [1.7±1.5 W · kg^?1] for P_mean). However, they were not affected by time‐of‐day in the fourth week of Ramadan. Considering the effect of Ramadan on anaerobic performances, in comparison with before Ramadan, no significant difference was observed during Ramadan at 07:00 h. The variables were significantly lower in the second week of Ramadan and in the fourth week of Ramadan at 17:00 h and 21:00 h. P_mean was not affected during the second week of Ramadan. In conclusion, the time‐of‐day effect on anaerobic power variables tends to disappear during Ramadan. In comparison with the period before Ramadan, anaerobic performances were unaffected in the morning but impaired in the evening during Ramadan.     

Theophylline Dose-Concentration Relationship of a 12-Hourly Nuelin SA Regimen Supplemented with Nocturnal Nuelin Liquid in Healthy Volunteers

Twelve healthy male volunteers who were diurnally active between 05:00 and 23:00 took part in a randomized, multiple-dose, double-blind, four-way, crossover study to determine the relationship between the dose of a nonsus-tained-release theophylline (NSRT) formulation added to the evening administration of a 12-hourly sustained-release theophylline (SRT) regimen and the elevation of the early morning (between 02:00 and 05:00) steady-state plasma theophylline concentration. The four treatments were 250 mg Nuelin SA (sustained-release theophylline) every 12 h plus either placebo or Nuelin liquid (non-sustained-release theophylline) equivalent to 100 mg, 200 mg, or 300 mg of theophylline. Without evening supplementation (placebo), the early morning plasma theophylline concentrations were 13% lower than the average 24-h concentration. but with evening supplementation the early morning plasma theophylline concentration could be raised up to and above the average 24-h Concentration. A prediction equation for the early morning plasma theophylline concentration as a function of the additional evening dose of Nuelin liquid, and of the steady-state evening trough plasma theophylline concentration without evening supplementation, was established. This prediction equation can be used to determine the additional evening dose of Nuelin liquid (administered at 19:00) needed to reduce early morning bronchoconstriction in asthmatic patients who are on a 12-hourly Nuelin SA (drug administered at 07:00 and 19:00) regimen.