真菌中锌簇蛋白的结构和功能

锌簇家族蛋白即Zn₂Cys₆类锌指蛋白,是真菌中特有的一类蛋白,它们属于转录因子类,广泛参与真菌中初级和次级代谢、胁迫应答和细胞分裂等生命活动的调控。锌簇蛋白主要包括N端的DNA结合结构域、中间的调节结构域和C端的酸性区域,其中DNA结合结构域包含锌指基序并负责结合靶基因的启动子。目前已经解析了多个锌簇家族转录因子DNA结合结构域的三维结构,并发现该家族中一些蛋白能够参与调控多个基因的表达,但缺乏对其结构、动力学和功能关系的全面分析。本文综合分析了不同锌簇蛋白与DNA结合的结构特征,总结其结构域与功能的关系,指出锌簇蛋白研究的重要方向,旨在为锌簇家族蛋白的深入研究提供思路。     

SB P 转录因子的结构和功能

SBP是植物所特有的一类转录因子。SBP家族成员在结构上有共同的特点：每个成员都含有由76个左右氨基酸组成的非常保守的DNA结合域（即SBP结合域）。含有SBP结合域的转录因子在植物中广泛存在,并且参与植物生长、发育的多个方面。比如花器官的形成等。在此。主要介绍了植物转录因子SBP家族的结构及其功能的研究进展。     

The Protein-Binding Potential of C2H2 Zinc Finger Domains

There are over 10,000 C2H2-type zinc finger (ZF) domains distributed among more than 1,000 ZF proteins in the human genome. These domains are frequently observed to be involved in sequence-specific DNA binding, and uncharacterized domains are typically assumed to facilitate DNA interactions. However, some ZFs also facilitate binding to proteins or RNA. Over 100 Cys2-His2 (C2H2) ZF-protein interactions have been described. We initially attempted a bioinformatics analysis to identify sequence features that would predict a DNA- or protein-binding function. These efforts were complicated by several issues, including uncertainties about the full functional capabilities of the ZFs. We therefore applied an unbiased approach to directly examine the potential for ZFs to facilitate DNA or protein interactions. The human OLF-1/EBF associated zinc finger (OAZ) protein was used as a model. The human O/E-1-associated zinc finger protein (hOAZ) contains 30 ZFs in 6 clusters, some of which have been previously indicated in DNA or protein interactions. DNA binding was assessed using a target site selection (CAST) assay, and protein binding was assessed using a yeast two-hybrid assay. We observed that clusters known to bind DNA could facilitate specific protein interactions, but clusters known to bind protein did not facilitate specific DNA interactions. Our primary conclusion is that DNA binding is a more restricted function of ZFs, and that their potential for mediating protein interactions is likely greater. These results suggest that the role of C2H2 ZF domains in protein interactions has probably been underestimated. The implication of these findings for the prediction of ZF function is discussed.     

Genome-wide analysis of transcription factor E2F1 mutant proteins reveals that N- and C-terminal protein interaction domains do not participate in targeting E2F1 to the human genome

Previous studies of E2F family members have suggested that protein-protein interactions may be the mechanism by which E2F proteins are recruited to specific genomic regions. We have addressed this hypothesis on a genome-wide scale using ChIP-seq analysis of MCF7 cell lines that express tagged wild type and mutant E2F1 proteins. First, we performed ChIP-seq for tagged WT E2F1. Then, we analyzed E2F1 proteins that lacked the N-terminal SP1 and cyclin A binding domains, the C-terminal transactivation and pocket protein binding domains, and the internal marked box domain. Surprisingly, we found that the ChIP-seq patterns of the mutant proteins were identical to that of WT E2F1. However, mutation of the DNA binding domain abrogated all E2F1 binding to the genome. These results suggested that the interaction between the E2F1 DNA binding domain and a consensus motif may be the primary determinant of E2F1 recruitment. To address this possibility, we analyzed the in vivo binding sites for the in vitro-derived consensus E2F1 motif (TTTSSCGC) and also performed de novo motif analysis. We found that only 12% of the ChIP-seq peaks contained the TTTSSCGC motif. De novo motif analysis indicated that most of the in vivo sites lacked the 5' half of the in vitro-derived consensus, having instead the in vivo consensus of CGCGC. In summary, our findings do not provide support for the model that protein-protein interactions are involved in recruiting E2F1 to the genome, but rather suggest that recognition of a motif found at most human promoters is the critical determinant.