Regulatory sequence analysis tools

The web resource Regulatory Sequence Analysis Tools (RSAT) (http://rsat.ulb.ac.be/rsat) offers a collection of software tools dedicated to the prediction of regulatory sites in non-coding DNA sequences. These tools include sequence retrieval, pattern discovery, pattern matching, genome-scale pattern matching, feature-map drawing, random sequence generation and other utilities. Alternative formats are supported for the representation of regulatory motifs (strings or position-specific scoring matrices) and several algorithms are proposed for pattern discovery. RSAT currently holds >100 fully sequenced genomes and these data are regularly updated from GenBank.     

3MATRIX and 3MOTIF: a protein structure visualization system for conserved sequence motifs

Computational methods such as sequence alignment and motif construction are useful in grouping related proteins into families, as well as helping to annotate new proteins of unknown function. These methods identify conserved amino acids in protein sequences, but cannot determine the specific functional or structural roles of conserved amino acids without additional study. In this work, we present 3MATRIX (http://3matrix.stanford.edu) and 3MOTIF (http://3motif.stanford.edu), a web-based sequence motif visualization system that displays sequence motif information in its appropriate three-dimensional (3D) context. This system is flexible in that users can enter sequences, keywords, structures or sequence motifs to generate visualizations. In 3MOTIF, users can search using discrete sequence motifs such as PROSITE patterns, eMOTIFs, or any other regular expression-like motif. Similarly, 3MATRIX accepts an eMATRIX position-specific scoring matrix, or will convert a multiple sequence alignment block into an eMATRIX for visualization. Each query motif is used to search the protein structure database for matches, in which the motif is then visually highlighted in three dimensions. Important properties of motifs such as sequence conservation and solvent accessible surface area are also displayed in the visualizations, using carefully chosen color shading schemes.     

XFINGER: A tool for searching and visualising protein fingerprints and patterns

A tool for searching pattern and fingerprint databases is described.Fingerprints are groups of motifs excised from conserved regionsof sequence alignments and used for iterative database scanning.The constituent motifs are thus encoded as small alignmentsin which sequence information is maximised with each databasepass; they therefore differ from regular-expression patterns,in which alignments are reduced to single consensus sequences.Different database formats have evolved to store these disparatetypes of information, namely the PROSITE dictionary of patternsand the PRINTS fingerprint database, but programs have not beenavailable with the flexibility to search them both. We havedeveloped a facility to do this: the system allows query sequencesto be scanned against either PROSITE, the full PRINTS database,or against individual fingerprints. The results of fingerprintsearches are displayed simultaneously in both text and graphicalwindows to render them more tangible to the user. Where structuralcoordinates are available, identified motifs may be visualisedin a 3D context. The program runs on Silicon Graphics machinesusing GL graphics libraries and on machines with X servers supportingthe PEX extension: its use is illustrated here by depictingthe location of low-density lipoprotein-binding (LDL) motifsand leucine-rich repeats in a mosaic G-protein-coupled receptor(GPCR).     

IMPALA: matching a protein sequence against a collection of PSI-BLAST-constructed position-specific score matrices

MOTIVATION: Many studies have shown that database searches using position-specific score matrices (PSSMs) or profiles as queries are more effective at identifying distant protein relationships than are searches that use simple sequences as queries. One popular program for constructing a PSSM and comparing it with a database of sequences is Position-Specific Iterated BLAST (PSI-BLAST). RESULTS: This paper describes a new software package, IMPALA, designed for the complementary procedure of comparing a single query sequence with a database of PSI-BLAST-generated PSSMs. We illustrate the use of IMPALA to search a database of PSSMs for protein folds, and one for protein domains involved in signal transduction. IMPALA's sensitivity to distant biological relationships is very similar to that of PSI-BLAST. However, IMPALA employs a more refined analysis of statistical significance and, unlike PSI-BLAST, guarantees the output of the optimal local alignment by using the rigorous Smith-Waterman algorithm. Also, it is considerably faster when run with a large database of PSSMs than is BLAST or PSI-BLAST when run against the complete non-redundant protein database.     

Relation between weight matrix and substitution matrix: motif search by similarity

MOTIVATION: The discovery of patterns shared by several sequences that differ greatly is a basic task in sequence analysis, and still a challenge. Several methods have been developed for detecting patterns. Methods commonly used for motif search include the Gibbs sampler, Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm and some intuitive greedy approaches. One cannot guarantee the optimality of the result produced by the Gibbs sampler in a single run. The deterministic EM methods tend to get trapped by local optima. Solutions found by greedy approaches are rarely sufficiently good. RESULTS: A simple model describing a motif or a portion of local multiple sequence alignment is the weight matrix model, in which a motif is characterized with position-specific probabilities. Two substitution matrices are proposed to relate the sequence similarity with the weight matrix. Combining the substitution matrix and weight matrix, we examine three typical sets of protein sequences with increasing complexity. At a low score threshold for pair similarity, sliding windows are compared with a seed window to find the score sum, which provides a measure of statistical significance for multiple sequence comparison. Such a similarity analysis reveals many aspects of motifs. Blocks determined by similarity can be used to deduce a primary weight matrix or an improved substitution matrix. The algorithm successfully obtains the optimal solution for the test sets by just greedy iteration.     

TOPDOM: database of domains and motifs with conservative location in transmembrane proteins

The TOPDOM database is a collection of domains and sequence motifs located consistently on the same side of the membrane in alpha-helical transmembrane proteins. The database was created by scanning well-annotated transmembrane protein sequences in the UniProt database by specific domain or motif detecting algorithms. The identified domains or motifs were added to the database if they were uniformly annotated on the same side of the membrane of the various proteins in the UniProt database. The information about the location of the collected domains and motifs can be incorporated into constrained topology prediction algorithms, like HMMTOP, increasing the prediction accuracy. AVAILABILITY: The TOPDOM database and the constrained HMMTOP prediction server are available on the page http://topdom.enzim.hu CONTACT: tusi@enzim.hu; lkalmar@enzim.hu.     

Mining protein sequences for motifs.

We use methods from Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery to design an algorithm for detecting motifs in protein sequences. The algorithm assumes that a motif is constituted by the presence of a "good" combination of residues in appropriate locations of the motif. The algorithm attempts to compile such good combinations into a "pattern dictionary" by processing an aligned training set of protein sequences. The dictionary is subsequently used to detect motifs in new protein sequences. Statistical significance of the detection results are ensured by statistically determining the various parameters of the algorithm. Based on this approach, we have implemented a program called GYM. The Helix-Turn-Helix motif was used as a model system on which to test our program. The program was also extended to detect Homeodomain motifs. The detection results for the two motifs compare favorably with existing programs. In addition, the GYM program provides a lot of useful information about a given protein sequence.     

MotifCut: regulatory motifs finding with maximum density subgraphs

MOTIVATION: DNA motif finding is one of the core problems in computational biology, for which several probabilistic and discrete approaches have been developed. Most existing methods formulate motif finding as an intractable optimization problem and rely either on expectation maximization (EM) or on local heuristic searches. Another challenge is the choice of motif model: simpler models such as the position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM) impose biologically unrealistic assumptions such as independence of the motif positions, while more involved models are harder to parametrize and learn. RESULTS: We present MotifCut, a graph-theoretic approach to motif finding leading to a convex optimization problem with a polynomial time solution. We build a graph where the vertices represent all k-mers in the input sequences, and edges represent pairwise k-mer similarity. In this graph, we search for a motif as the maximum density subgraph, which is a set of k-mers that exhibit a large number of pairwise similarities. Our formulation does not make strong assumptions regarding the structure of the motif and in practice both motifs that fit well the PSSM model, and those that exhibit strong dependencies between position pairs are found as dense subgraphs. We benchmark MotifCut on both synthetic and real yeast motifs, and find that it compares favorably to existing popular methods. The ability of MotifCut to detect motifs appears to scale well with increasing input size. Moreover, the motifs we discover are different from those discovered by the other methods. AVAILABILITY: MotifCut server and other materials can be found at motifcut.stanford.edu.     

Tsukuba BB: a branch and bound algorithm for local multiple alignment of DNA and protein sequences.

In this paper we present a branch and bound algorithm for local gapless multiple sequence alignment (motif alignment) and its implementation. The algorithm uses both score-based bounding and a novel bounding technique based on the "consistency" of the alignment. A sequence order independent search tree is used in conjunction with a technique for avoiding redundant calculations inherent in the structure of the tree. This is the first program to exploit the fact that the motif alignment problem is easier for short motifs. Indeed, for a short fixed motif width, the running time of the algorithm is asymptotically linear in the size of the input. We tested the performance of the program on a dataset of 300 E. coli promoter sequences and a dataset of 85 lipocalin protein sequences. For a motif width of 4, the optimal alignment of the entire set of sequences can be found. For the more natural motif width of 6, the program can align 21 sequences of length 100, more than twice the number of sequences which can be aligned by the best previous exact algorithm. The algorithm can relax the constraint of requiring each sequence to be aligned, and align 105 of the 300 promoter sequences with a motif width of 6. For the lipocalin dataset, we introduce a technique for reducing the effective alphabet size with a minimal loss of useful information. With this technique, we show that the program can find meaningful motifs in a reasonable amount of time by optimizing the score over three motif positions.     

Comparison of several protein sequences by recognition of conserved regions

The sequences of related proteins show the alternance of conserved and variable regions. This fact is generally seen as a reverberation of 3 D constraints onto 1 D structures. Although the exact meaning of such constraints remains elusive, conserved regions can be extracted from protein chains and used to align them. We developed a program that efficiently performs this task. The program constructs symbolic motifs fitting a target subsequence present in every chain without requiring any insertion or deletion. However, a motif can be obliterated by substitutions when it is found in a sequence. The motifs formally consist in aminoacid symbols separated (and virtually preceded and followed) by a variable number of wild-card symbols. A wild-card, which can match any aminoacid of the chains (with no increment of score), represents a variable site within conserved regions. Different motifs are progressively built by substituting a wild-card with an aminoacid symbol within or beside preexisting motifs. Only those motifs showing an outstanding association of high matching score over all chains, and of low deviation between extreme scores over individual chains are selected for making the next generation. Starting with a null motif, the construction ends when no new aminoacid can be introduced into the current motifs. A surviving motif is then considered valid if it maps without ambiguity a unique region in every sequence, and the motif with highest score is finally selected. The construction of new motifs is then reinitated for the left and right parts of the sequences, after these have been split by the previously selected motif.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Profile scanning for three-dimensional structural patterns in protein sequences

Profile analysis measures the similarity between a target sequenceand a group of aligned sequences (the probe). The probe sequencesare used to produce a position-specific scoring table (the profile)that can be aligned with any sequence (the target) using standarddynamic programming methods. We are developing a library ofprofiles, each describing a different structural motif. Thisallows any target sequence to be rapidly scanned for the presenceof structural motifs. Levels of significance for the comparisonof target sequences with the profile are determined in advance,permitting an objective decision to be made as to whether aprotein is likely to possess a structural motif. Received on July 17, 1987; accepted on January 4, 1988