Regulated hyperacetylation of core histones during mouse spermatogenesis: involvement of histone deacetylases

Here we report a detailed analysis of waves of histone acetylation that occurs throughout spermatogenesis in mouse. Our data showed that spermatogonia and preleptotene spermatocytes contained acetylated core histones H2A, H2B and H4, whereas no acetylated histones were observed throughout meiosis in leptotene or pachytene spermatocytes. Histones remained unacetylated in most round spermatids. Acetylated forms of H2A and H2B, H3 and H4 reappeared in step 9 to 11 elongating spermatids, and disappeared later in condensing spermatids. The spatial distribution pattern of acetylated H4 within the spermatids nuclei, analyzed in 3D by immunofluorescence combined with confocal microscopy, showed a spatial sequence of events tightly associated with chromatin condensation. In order to gain an insight into mechanisms controlling histone hyperacetylation during spermiogenesis, we treated spermatogenic cells with a histone deacetylase inhibitor, trichostatin A (TSA), which showed a spectacular increase of histone acetylation in round spermatids. This observation suggests that deacetylases are responsible for maintaining a deacetylated state of histones in these cells. TSA treatment could not induce histone acetylation in condensing spermatids, suggesting that acetylated core histones are replaced by transition proteins without being previously deacetylated. Moreover, our data showed a dramatic decrease in histone deacetylases in condensing spermatids. Therefore, the regulation of histone deacetylase activity/concentration appears to play a major role in controling histone hyperacetylation and probably histone replacement during spermiogenesis.     

Characterization of histone H2A and H2B variants and their post-translational modifications by mass spectrometry

The nucleosome, the fundamental structural unit of chromatin, contains an octamer of core histones H3, H4, H2A, and H2B. Incorporation of histone variants alters the functional properties of chromatin. To understand the global dynamics of chromatin structure and function, analysis of histone variants incorporated into the nucleosome and their covalent modifications is required. Here we report the first global mass spectrometric analysis of histone H2A and H2B variants derived from Jurkat cells. A combination of mass spectrometric techniques, HPLC separations, and enzymatic digestions using endoproteinase Glu-C, endoproteinase Arg-C, and trypsin were used to identify histone H2A and H2B subtypes and their modifications. We identified nine histone H2A and 11 histone H2B subtypes, among them proteins that only had been postulated at the gene level. The two main H2A variants, H2AO and H2AC, as well as H2AL were either acetylated at Lys-5 or phosphorylated at Ser-1. For the replacement histone H2AZ, acetylation at Lys-4 and Lys-7 was found. The main histone H2B variant, H2BA, was acetylated at Lys-12, -15, and -20. The analysis of core histone subtypes with their modifications provides a first step toward an understanding of the functional significance of the diversity of histone structures.     

Pericentric heterochromatin becomes enriched with H2A.Z during early mammalian development

Determining how chromatin is remodelled during early development, when totipotent cells begin to differentiate into specific cell types, is essential to understand how epigenetic states are established. An important mechanism by which chromatin can be remodelled is the replacement of major histones with specific histone variants. During early mammalian development H2A.Z plays an essential, but unknown, function(s). We show here that undifferentiated mouse cells of the inner cell mass lack H2A.Z, but upon differentiation H2A.Z expression is switched on. Strikingly, H2A.Z is first targeted to pericentric hetero chromatin and then to other regions of the nucleus, but is excluded from the inactive X chromosome and the nucleolus. This targeted incorporation of H2A.Z could provide a critical signal to distinguish constitutive from facultative heterochromatin. In support of this model, we demonstrate that H2A.Z can directly interact with the pericentric heterochromatin binding protein INCENP. We propose that H2A.Z functions to establish a specialized pericentric domain by assembling an architecturally distinct chromatin structure and by recruiting specific nuclear proteins.     

Histone H3.3 phosphorylation promotes heterochromatin formation by inhibiting H3K9/K36 histone demethylase

Histone H3.3 is an H3 variant which differs from the canonical H3.1/2 at four residues, including a serine residue at position 31 which is evolutionarily conserved. The H3.3 S31 residue is phosphorylated (H3.3 S31Ph) at heterochromatin regions including telomeres and pericentric repeats. However, the role of H3.3 S31Ph in these regions remains unknown. In this study, we find that H3.3 S31Ph regulates heterochromatin accessibility at telomeres during replication through regulation of H3K9/K36 histone demethylase KDM4B. In mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells, substitution of S31 with an alanine residue (H3.3 A31 –phosphorylation null mutant) results in increased KDM4B activity that removes H3K9me3 from telomeres. In contrast, substitution with a glutamic acid (H3.3 E31, mimics S31 phosphorylation) inhibits KDM4B, leading to increased H3K9me3 and DNA damage at telomeres. H3.3 E31 expression also increases damage at other heterochromatin regions including the pericentric heterochromatin and Y chromosome-specific satellite DNA repeats. We propose that H3.3 S31Ph regulation of KDM4B is required to control heterochromatin accessibility of repetitive DNA and preserve chromatin integrity.     

Acetylation of rat testis histones H2B and TH2B

The in vivo acetylation of rat testis histones H3 and H4 has been demonstrated in previous studies. In this study, analysis of purified histone fractions revealed the in vivo acetylation of histone H2B, the testis histone variant designated TH2B, and two or more of the histone H2A variants. These findings are quite significant, because it is possible that all of the core histones are acetylated in elongating spermatids at the time of removal of the entire histone complement for replacement by basic spermatidal transition proteins (S.R. Grimes and N. Henderson, 1983, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 221, 108-116).     

Novel Classes and Evolutionary Turnover of Histone H2B Variants in the Mammalian Germline

Histones and their posttranslational modifications facilitate diverse chromatin functions in eukaryotes. Core histones (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4) package genomes after DNA replication. In contrast, variant histones promote specialized chromatin functions, including DNA repair, genome stability, and epigenetic inheritance. Previous studies have identified only a few H2B variants in animals; their roles and evolutionary origins remain largely unknown. Here, using phylogenomic analyses, we reveal the presence of five H2B variants broadly present in mammalian genomes. Three of these variants have been previously described: H2B.1, H2B.L (also called subH2B), and H2B.W. In addition, we identify and describe two new variants: H2B.K and H2B.N. Four of these variants originated in mammals, whereas H2B.K arose prior to the last common ancestor of bony vertebrates. We find that though H2B variants are subject to high gene turnover, most are broadly retained in mammals, including humans. Despite an overall signature of purifying selection, H2B variants evolve more rapidly than core H2B with considerable divergence in sequence and length. All five H2B variants are expressed in the germline. H2B.K and H2B.N are predominantly expressed in oocytes, an atypical expression site for mammalian histone variants. Our findings suggest that H2B variants likely encode potentially redundant but vital functions via unusual chromatin packaging or nonchromatin functions in mammalian germline cells. Our discovery of novel histone variants highlights the advantages of comprehensive phylogenomic analyses and provides unique opportunities to study how innovations in chromatin function evolve.     

Cell cycle dynamics of histone variants at the centromere, a model for chromosomal landmarks

Classical heterochromatin chromosomal landmarks, such as centromeres and telomeres, are characterized by specific chromatin signatures. Among these, the incorporation of histone variants has recently emerged as an important feature. Using the centromere as a paradigm, we consider the role of histone variant dynamics in locus-specific chromatin organization. We describe the distinct location and dynamics of CenH3, H3.3, and H2AZ at the centromere during the cell cycle. This leads us to present the current view concerning modes of incorporation at this chromosomal landmark. Finally, we highlight the importance of histone variants in the crosstalk between centric and pericentric domains for maintaining centromere identity.     

The HP1α–CAF1–SetDB1‐containing complex provides H3K9me1 for Suv39‐mediated K9me3 in pericentric heterochromatin

Trimethylation of lysine 9 in histone H3 (H3K9me3) enrichment is a characteristic of pericentric heterochromatin. The hypothesis of a stepwise mechanism to establish and maintain this mark during DNA replication suggests that newly synthesized histone H3 goes through an intermediate methylation state to become a substrate for the histone methyltransferase Suppressor of variegation 39 (Suv39H1/H2). How this intermediate methylation state is achieved and how it is targeted to the correct place at the right time is not yet known. Here, we show that the histone H3K9 methyltransferase SetDB1 associates with the specific heterochromatin protein 1α (HP1α)–chromatin assembly factor 1 (CAF1) chaperone complex. This complex monomethylates K9 on non‐nucleosomal histone H3. Therefore, the heterochromatic HP1α–CAF1–SetDB1 complex probably provides H3K9me1 for subsequent trimethylation by Suv39H1/H2 in pericentric regions. The connection of CAF1 with DNA replication, HP1α with heterochromatin formation and SetDB1 for H3K9me1 suggests a highly coordinated mechanism to ensure the propagation of H3K9me3 in pericentric heterochromatin during DNA replication.     

The histone domain of macroH2A1 contains several dispersed elements that are each sufficient to direct enrichment on the inactive X chromosome

Histone variants replace the core histones in a substantial fraction of nucleosomes, affecting chromatin structure and impacting chromatin-templated processes. In many instances incorporation of histone variants results in formation of specialized regions of chromatin. Proper localization of histone variants to distinct regions of the genome is critical for their function, yet how this specific localization is achieved remains unclear. macroH2A1 is enriched on the inactive X chromosome in female mammalian cells, where it functions to maintain gene silencing. macroH2A1 consists of a histone H2A-like histone domain and a large, globular C-terminal macro domain that is not present in other histone proteins. The histone domain of macroH2A1 is alone sufficient to direct enrichment on the inactive X chromosome when expressed in female cells, indicating that sequences important for correct localization lie in this domain. Here we investigate whether divergent sequences of the H2A variant macroH2A1 contribute to its correct localization. We mapped the regions of the macroH2A1 histone domain that are sufficient for localization to the inactive X chromosome using chimeras between H2A and the histone domain of macroH2A1. Multiple short sequences dispersed along the macroH2A1 histone domain individually supported enrichment on the inactive X chromosome when introduced into H2A. These sequences map to the surface of the macroH2A1/H2B dimer, but are buried in the crystal structure of the macroH2A1 containing nucleosome, suggesting that they may contribute to recognition by macroH2A1/H2B deposition factors.     

LSH catalyzes ATP-driven exchange of histone variants macroH2A1 and macroH2A2

LSH, a homologue of the ISWI/SNF2 family of chromatin remodelers, is required in vivo for deposition of the histone variants macroH2A1 and macroH2A2 at specific genomic locations. However, it remains unknown whether LSH is directly involved in this process or promotes other factors. Here we show that recombinant LSH interacts in vitro with macroH2A1–H2B and macroH2A2–H2B dimers, but not with H2A.Z–H2B dimers. Moreover, LSH catalyzes the transfer of macroH2A into mono-nucleosomes reconstituted with canonical core histones in an ATP dependent manner. LSH requires the ATP binding site and the replacement process is unidirectional leading to heterotypic and homotypic nucleosomes. Both variants macroH2A1 and macroH2A2 are equally well incorporated into the nucleosome. The histone exchange reaction is specific for histone variant macroH2A, since LSH is not capable to incorporate H2A.Z. These findings define a previously unknown role for LSH in chromatin remodeling and identify a novel molecular mechanism for deposition of the histone variant macroH2A.     

The human histone H3 complement anno 2011

Histones are highly basic, relatively small proteins that complex with DNA to form higher order structures that underlie chromosome topology. Of the four core histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4, it is H3 that is most heavily modified at the post-translational level. The human genome harbours 16 annotated bona fide histone H3 genes which code for four H3 protein variants. In 2010, two novel histone H3.3 protein variants were reported, carrying over twenty amino acid substitutions. Nevertheless, they appear to be incorporated into chromatin. Interestingly, these new H3 genes are located on human chromosome 5 in a repetitive region that harbours an additional five H3 pseudogenes, but no other core histone ORFs. In addition, a human-specific novel putative histone H3.3 variant located at 12p11.21 was reported in 2011. These developments raised the question as to how many more human histone H3 ORFs there may be. Using homology searches, we detected 41 histone H3 pseudogenes in the current human genome assembly. The large majority are derived from the H3.3 gene H3F3A, and three of those may code for yet more histone H3.3 protein variants. We also identified one extra intact H3.2-type variant ORF in the vicinity of the canonical HIST2 gene cluster at chromosome 1p21.2. RNA polymerase II occupancy data revealed heterogeneity in H3 gene expression in human cell lines. None of the novel H3 genes were significantly occupied by RNA polymerase II in the data sets at hand, however. We discuss the implications of these recent developments.     

Isolation and characterization of the histone variants in chicken erythrocytes.

Chicken erythrocyte histones 2A, 2B, and 3 can be resolved into nonallelic primary structure variants by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in the presence of Triton X-100. These variants were isolated and characterized by analysis of their tryptic and thermolytic peptides. The major variants of chicken H2A and H2B differ from the analogous component of calf thymus by a small number of conservative amino acid substitutions in the basic terminal regions, which interact with DNA. This moderate rate of allelic evolution of the slightly lysine-rich histones contrasts with the complete conservatism found in the arginine-rich histones. Chicken H4 and both chicken H3 variants are identical with their corresponding components in mammals. The amino acid substitutions distinguishing histone variants are located within the highly conserved hydrophobic regions, which are involved in histone--histone interactions.     

Regulation of the expression of histone H3.3 by differential polyadenylation.

Previously we have shown that the 3' untranslated regions (UTRs) of the replacement histone genes H3.3.A and H3.3B of Drosophila melanogaster differ in their nucleotide sequences and have different polyadenylation sites. To understand their functional relevance, which might explain the presence and evolutionary conservation of 2 different H3.3 genes, green fluorescent protein (GFP) constructs with different 3' UTR sections were studied by the expression of GFP as a marker protein. Here we show that the polyadenylation signals modify the cell-specific translation of the histone replacement variants in testes and ovaries. The H3.3A gene may be required to provide postmeiotic histone H3.3 in the male germ line in transition to chromatin packaging in sperm.     

PR-SET7 and SUV4-20H regulate H4 lysine-20 methylation at imprinting control regions in the mouse

Imprinted genes are important in development and their allelic expression is mediated by imprinting control regions (ICRs). On their DNA-methylated allele, ICRs are marked by trimethylation at H3 Lys 9 (H3K9me3) and H4 Lys 20 (H4K20me3), similar to pericentric heterochromatin. Here, we investigate which histone methyltransferases control this methylation of histone at ICRs. We found that inactivation of SUV4-20H leads to the loss of H4K20me3 and increased levels of its substrate, H4K20me1. H4K20me1 is controlled by PR-SET7 and is detected on both parental alleles. The disruption of SUV4-20H or PR-SET7 does not affect methylation of DNA at ICRs but influences precipitation of H3K9me3, which is suggestive of a trans-histone change. Unlike at pericentric heterochromatin, however, H3K9me3 at ICRs does not depend on SUV39H. Our data show not only new similarities but also differences between ICRs and heterochromatin, both of which show constitutive maintenance of methylation of DNA in somatic cells.