CEA、CA19-9与CA72-4用于诊断老年胃癌的临床价值研究

目的:探讨CEA、CA19-9以及CA72-4诊断老年胃癌的临床价值。方法:对192例经活检确诊为老年胃癌患者的血清CEA、CA19-9以及CA72-4水平进行分析,比较不同TNM分期老年胃癌患者的血清CEA、CA19-9以及CA72-4阳性率,并评价血清CEA、CA19-9以及CA72-4水平诊断老年胃癌的敏感性和特异性。结果:TNM 3期及4期的胃癌患者CEA以及CA19-9阳性率明显高于1期及2期胃癌患者,而TNM1-4期的胃癌患者CA72-4的阳性率都明显高于CEA以及CA19-9。以6.5 ng/m L、30U/m L以及4 ng/m L分别作为CEA、CA19-9以及CA72-4的上限临界值,其诊断老年患者的胃癌的敏感性分别为15.6%、19.3%以及29.2%,特异性分别为98.9%、97.2%以及98.0%,曲线下面积分别为0.59、0.62以及0.66。结论:CEA、CA19-9以及CA72-4对于诊断老年胃癌都有较好的特异性,但敏感性一般,尤其对于早期胃癌,CEA及CA19-9敏感性较差,CA72-4敏感性要优于二者。     

Prognostic value of serum and tumor tissue CA 72-4 content in gastric cancer

To date no general agreement has been reached regarding the prognostic significance of CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 as serum markers in gastric cancer, and only scattered information is available on the predictive value of marker expression in tumor tissue. Therefore, a longitudinal study was designed to analyze the presurgical serum and tumor tissue content of CA 72-4, CEA and CA 19-9 in 166 patients at different stages of gastric cancer, and to evaluate the possible correlation with clinicopathological features in respect to prognostic information on relapse-free survival. The results obtained showed that 48.4% of patients with tumor recurrence had positive presurgical CA 72-4 levels compared to approximately 24% of patients who remained free of disease. Furthermore, the median presurgical serum CA 72-4 levels were significantly elevated in relapsing patients. Serosa and lymph node involvement as well as positive presurgical serum CA 72-4 levels had independent prognostic value in predicting recurrence. A significant association between disease-free survival and lymph node involvement, depth of invasion and tumor tissue content of CA 72-4 was also demonstrated. We may therefore conclude that CA 72-4 antigen can be considered the marker of choice in the follow-up of gastric cancer patients and may be used as a prognostic indicator of relapse.     

Granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor in patients with colorectal cancer

Granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) belongs to the group of glycoproteins called colony-stimulating factors (CSFs). It has been shown that the activity of CSFs is not limited to the hematopoietic cells but can also affect the proliferation of colon carcinoma cell lines. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the serum level of GM-CSF in colorectal cancer patients to a control group, to assess the level of GM-CSF in relation to the level of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), and to define the sensitivity, the specificity and the predictive values of GM-CSF in colorectal cancer. In this study, the serum level of tumour markers was measured in 30 patients with colorectal cancer and in 20 healthy subjects. GM-CSF was assayed using ELISA system, CEA and CA 19-9 were measured by MEIA. The serum levels of CEA, CA 19-9 and GM-CSF were higher in the patients with colorectal cancer than in the control group. The sensitivities of CEA (63%) and CA 19-9 (56%) were lower than the GM-CSF sensitivity (80%). The specificities of tumour markers were 70% (CEA, GM-CSF) and 75% for CA 19-9. The GM-CSF predictive v values were higher than the CEA and CA 19-9 values. These results suggest that GM-CSF may be useful as tumour marker in colorectal cancer, but further studies are needed.     

Tumor markers in pancreatic cancer: a comparative clinical study between CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 50

Seventy-eight patients were evaluated to ascertain the usefulness of markers CA 19-9 and CA 50 in diagnosing pancreatic cancer, using a less specific marker (CEA) as reference. Three groups were considered: a) 36 controls; b) 22 patients with benign obstructive jaundice; c) 20 patients with pancreatic cancer. Preoperative blood samples were obtained to ascertain CEA (E.I.A.), CA 19-9 (R.I.A.) and CA 50 (T.R.-F.I.A.). Serum concentrations of the various markers were significantly higher for patients with pancreatic cancer in comparison with the other groups, at cut-offs of 10 ng/ml (CEA), 100 ng/ml (CA 19-9) and 170 U/ml (CA 50). The sensitivity of CA 19-9 (94%) and CA 50 (88%) was much greater than that of CEA (30%). The specificity of the three markers in patients with pancreatic cancer, with respect to the control group, was 100% and this figure is reduced with respect to the group suffering from benign obstructive jaundice (CEA: 90%; CA 19-9: 88% and CA 50: 87%). Diagnostic results (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (P.P.V.) and negative predictive value (N.P.V.] did not significantly increase with respect to CA 19-9 and CA 50 when considered individually. It is concluded that the serum concentrations of CA 19-9 and CA 50 showed high sensitivity and specificity as markers of pancreatic cancer with respect to the other groups, pointing towards clinical routine clinical use of both markers. In addition, a comparative study of the literature has been made and prospects for short-term development and concrete applications for early and reliable diagnosis have been highlighted.     

Arginase as a useful factor for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer liver metastases

The present work is a continuation of studies on arginase as a marker in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM). The purpose of the study was the evaluation of the arginase test in comparison with other colorectal cancer tests such as CEA, CA 19-9 and biochemical markers of liver function such as aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT). The studies were conducted on blood serum from 85 patients with CRCLM obtained one to two days before tumor resection. The control group comprised 140 healthy blood donors and 81 patients with various non-malignant gastrointestinal diseases. Raised arginase activity was observed in serum of 85% of CRCLM patients, whereas elevated levels of CEA and CA 19-9 were found in 63% and 42% of patients, respectively. The combination of CEA or CA 19-9 with the arginase assay improved their sensitivity, but the sensitivity of the combined parameters was not higher than that of the arginase test itself. AST and ALT activities were increased in about 30% of CRCLM patients. The specificity of the arginase test calculated for 221 control subjects was 76%. It can thus be concluded that the determination of serum arginase activity can be helpful in the diagnosis of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases.     

血清CEA、CA19-9、CYFRA21-1与结直肠腺癌的相关性分析

目的:探究血清癌胚抗原(carcinoembryonic antigen,CEA)、糖类抗原19-9、细胞角蛋白19片段(cytokeratin19 fragements,CYFRA21-1)与结直肠腺癌的病理相关性。方法:选择于我院接受治疗的80例结直肠腺癌患者为病例组,选择同期于我院接受治疗的50例良性结直肠病变患者为良性对照组,选择我院体格检查的50例健康个体为对照组,分别采集三组个体的血样并进行CEA、CA19-9以及CYFRA21-1水平的检测,并比对三组个体上述因子阳性表达率、因子水平,同时分析三种因子同结直肠腺癌患者TNM分期相关性,最后探究三种因子对结直肠腺癌的诊断价值。结果:(1)以CEA≥2.805μg/L、CA19-9≥39 U/m L、CYFR21-1≥3.3 ng/mL为临界值,结果显示病例组CEA阳性率51.25%,CA19-9阳性率31.25%,CYFR21-1阳性率40.00%,明显高于良性组的10.00%、20.00%和10.00%,高于对照组的8.00%、12.00%和2.00%(P<0.05);(2)比较显示病例组患者的CEA、CA19-9以及CYFR21-1水平明显高于良性对照组以及对照组(P<0.05),良性对照组CEA、CA19-9以及CYFR21-1水平明显高于对照组(P<0.05);(3)比较显示IV期结直肠腺癌患者CEA、CA19-9以及CYFRA21-1水平明显高于III期以及I+II期(P<0.05),III期三种因子水平明显高于I+II期(P<0.05);(4)CEA对结直肠腺癌诊断一致性71.25%,灵敏度65.00%,特异度90.00%;CA19-9诊断一致性46.25%,灵敏度35.00%,特异度80.00%;CYFRA21-1诊断一致性55.00%,灵敏度46.67%,特异度80.00%;联合诊断一致性95.00%,灵敏度95.00%,特异度95.00%。结论:血清CEA、CA19-9以及CYFRA21-1对结直肠腺癌具有较明确的诊断价值,不同病理分期患者中表达差异明显,可以考虑将联合诊断作为结直肠腺癌鉴别方式之一,推广于临床中。     

Radioimmunoscintigraphy using monoclonal antibodies to CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 125

131I labelled F (ab')2 fragments of monoclonal antibodies against CA 19-9 and CEA ("radioimmunococktail" IMACIS 1) were used in a prospective study (n = 60 patients) and in a retrospective study (n = 32 patients) for the detection of colorectal carcinomas (n = 67) and other gastrointestinal CEA/CA 19-9-producing tumors (n = 32). Sensitivity was 82% and specificity 90%. Immunoscintigraphy proved useful and complementary to CT scan and sonography, especially in the diagnosis of pelvic recurrences and intra-abdominal metastases. In addition, monoclonal antibody OC 125 (IMACIS 2) was used for the detection of ovarian carcinomas (n = 10) and other CA 125 producing tumors. Immunoscintigraphy was positive in all patients (n = 18) suggesting that this radioimmunological approach could be of use in the staging, therapeutic control and earlier diagnosis of recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma.     

紫杉醇与地西他滨对晚期胃癌患者血清CEA、CA19-9 及CA72-4水平的影响

目的：探讨紫杉醇联合地西他滨对晚期胃癌患者血清癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9)、糖类抗原72-4(CA72-4)水平 的影响。方法：收集2013 年10 月-2015 年1 月于我院住院治疗的晚期胃癌患者122 例,随机分为实验组和对照组。实验组患者给 予紫杉醇和地西他滨化疗,对照组患者给予紫杉醇和安慰剂化疗。观察并比较两组患者治疗前后卡氏积分、血常规、血尿素氮、肌 酐、转氨酶含量以及血清CA199、CEA及CA724 水平的变化情况。结果：治疗后,两组患者的卡氏积分均较治疗前明显升高,血清 CEA、CA19-9、CA72-4水平均较治疗前显著降低,且实验组的卡氏积分显著高于对照组,血清CEA、CA19-9、CA72-4 水平明显低 于对照组,差异均具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。治疗前后,两组患者的白细胞、血红蛋白及血小板水平比较均无统计学差异（P＞ 0.05）。结论：紫杉醇联合地西他滨能有效降低晚期胃癌患者血清CEA、CA19-9、CA72-4 水平,并提高患者的生存质量,且安全性 较好。     

CA19-9、CA125、CEA及Ferritin联合检测诊断非小细胞肺癌脑、骨转移的临床价值研究

目的:研究CA19-9、CA125、癌胚抗原(CEA)以及铁蛋白(Ferritin)四种肿瘤标志物联合检测用于诊断非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)脑或(和)骨转移的临床价值。方法:选取2011年5月至2012年5月于我院就诊的NSCLC患者184例。将发现脑或(和)骨转移者归为转移组,共96例;将未发现脑、骨转移者归为无转移组,共88例,采用电化学发光免疫分析法测定各组患者血清中CA19-9、CA125、CEA以及Ferritin的水平,探讨其在NSCLC患者脑或(和)骨转移中的诊断效能。结果:在发生脑或(和)骨转移的NSCLC患者中,CA19-9、CA125、CEA及Ferritin四种肿瘤标志物的水平和阳性率均显著高于未发生骨、脑转移的患者。ROC曲线分析显示,以上四种肿瘤标志物对诊断NSCLC骨或(和)脑转移的敏感度分别为73.48%、69.13%、66.35%和61.34%;特异度分别为80.02%、32.51%、65.11%和62.58%;将四种肿瘤标志物联合进行诊断的敏感度和特异度分别为91.21%和88.64%,显著高于单一标志物诊断。结论:发生脑或(和)骨转移的NSCLC患者血清中CA19-9、CA125、CEA以及Ferritin四种肿瘤标志物水平均显著升高,以上标志物联合检测可提高NSCLC患者脑或(和)骨转移的诊断效能,可作为早期诊断NSCLC患者脑或(和)骨转移的辅助检测指标。     

Significance of CA 72.4 serum levels in gastrointestinal diseases

In order to evaluate the usefulness of Ca 72.4 tumor associated antigen assay in gastrointestinal diseases, we have studied 751 patients suffering from benign (376) and neoplastic (375) digestive diseases and 305 normal controls. The cut-off point was fixed at 6 U/ml. The Ca 72.4 assay, with the proposed method, provides additional information only in gastric cancers; the positivity of the marker in gastric neoplasms is 38.4% and the specificity vs gastric ulcers and atrophic gastritis is 99%. In six patients with gastric cancer, the Ca 72.4 is the only positive test. The most striking observation to be made from the current study is a no good sensitivity of the marker for gastrointestinal cancers (29.6% vs 35.7 and 37.6% for CEA and Ca 19-9 respectively), but rather the excellent specificity of the Ca 72.4 immunoassay with respect to being gastrointestinal diseases (98.7%), vs values of specificity for CEA and Ca 19-9 of 94 and 92%. In conclusion, the high specificity of this marker for gastrointestinal neoplasms may be very interesting in follow-up studies. In fact, an elevation of serum levels of Ca 72.4 should always be taken seriously.     

多层CT灌注成像参数与胃癌患者病理分化程度和血清CEA、AFP、CA72-4的关系研究

目的:探讨多层CT灌注成像参数与胃癌患者病理分化程度和血清癌胚抗原(CEA)、甲胎蛋白(AFP)、糖抗原72-4(CA72-4)的关系。方法:选取2016年5月到2018年5月期间在我院接受治疗的胃癌患者60例作为胃癌组,根据患者肿瘤细胞不同病理分化程度将患者分成中高分化组(34例)和低分化组(26例),另选取同期于我院进行健康检查的60例健康志愿者作为对照组。比较不同病理分化程度的胃癌患者多层CT灌注成像参数[血流量(BF)、达峰时间(TTP)、Patlak血容量(PBV)、Patlak表面通透性(PPS)],比较胃癌组和对照组血清CEA、AFP、CA72-4水平,分析胃癌患者多层CT灌注成像参数与血清肿瘤标志物的相关性。结果:胃癌组血清CEA、AFP、CA72-4水平明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。中高分化组PBV、PPS均明显低于低分化组,TTP明显高于低分化组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05),中高分化组和低分化组的BF比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。经Pearson法分析显示,胃癌患者的BF、TTP、PBV与CEA、AFP、CA72-4无明显的相关性(P0.05),PPS与CEA、AFP、CA72-4呈正相关(P0.05)。结论:胃癌患者的多层CT灌注成像参数与患者的病理分化程度有关,且部分参数还与血清肿瘤标志物CEA、AFP、CA72-4呈正相关。     

The value of CEA and CA 19-9 in detecting cancer in a group of high-risk subjects with gastrointestinal symptoms

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of CEA and CA 19-9 in a potential high-risk population of subjects with gastrointestinal complaints. The basic question was whether the determination of these markers, in addition to some other clinical features in this high risk population, could be helpful in diagnosing intraabdominal cancer. Two hundred and two patients with gastrointestinal complaints underwent standard diagnostic procedures and were followed for at least one year. For every patient, CEA and CA 19-9 levels were obtained at the first examination; the evaluating physician was blinded to the marker levels. The determinants of the likelihood of cancer were evaluated by multivariate analysis. Seventeen patients were diagnosed as having intraabdominal cancers. With the presence of melena (RR = 101.63, p = 0.007), nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms (RR = 12.54, p = 0.026), increasing age (RR = 1.09, p = 0.028) and abnormal CEA (RR = 240.79, p = 0.000), the risk of having cancer increased significantly and independently. The presence of a primary gastric complaint was associated with a lower risk of cancer in this cohort (RR = 0.01, p = 0.04). Markers were not used in the diagnostic workup. In conclusion, in patients presenting with gastrointestinal complaints, the finding of elevated CEA levels may help in the diagnosis of cancer by prompting a more extensive search for intraabdominal cancer.     

Significance of CA72.4 in patients with colorectal cancer. Comparison with CEA and CA19.9.

CA72.4 is a new tumor-associated antigen identified by monoclonal antibodies cc49 and B72.3. Serum levels of CA72.4 were measured in patients with benign and malignant diseases. The cut-off used was 4 U/mL. CA72.4 is a highly specific marker since only 3% of 162 patients with benign diseases had elevated levels of antigen. Forty-four percent of 89 patients with colorectal cancer had elevated CA72.4 levels. Compared with CEA and CA19.9, we have found that CEA (75%) is the most sensitive marker (p less than 0.001). The simultaneous use of two or three markers did not further contribute to the evaluation of patients with colorectal cancer.     

Elevated CEA and CA19-9 serum levels independently predict advanced pancreatic cancer at diagnosis

Abstract

Purpose: It is suggested that tumour markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) could be used to predict the stage of pancreatic cancer. However, optimal cut-off values for CEA and CA19-9 are disputable. This study aimed to assess the value of CEA and CA19-9 serum levels at diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) as predictors for the advanced stage of PDAC in patients discussed at pancreatic multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings.

Methods: Patients with suspected PDAC discussed at MDT meetings from 2013 to 2017 were reviewed, in order to determine optimal cut-off values of both CEA and CA19-9.

Results: In total, 375 patients were included. Optimal cut-off values for predicting advanced PDAC were 7.0?ng/ml for CEA and 305.0?U/ml for CA19-9, resulting in positive predictive values of 83.3%, 73.6%, and 91.4% for CEA, CA19-9 and combined, respectively. Both tumour markers were independent predictors of advanced PDAC, demonstrated by an odds ratio of 4.21 (95% CI:1.85–9.56; p?=?0.001) for CEA and 2.58 for CA19-9 (95% CI:1.30–5.14; p?=?0.007).

Conclusions: CEA appears to be a more robust predictor of advanced PDAC than CA19-9. Implementing CEA and CA19-9 serum levels during MDT meetings as an additional tool for establishing tumour resectability is worthwhile for tailored diagnostics.     

血清CEA、CA19-9联合CRP在消化道恶性肿瘤的诊断价值分析

摘要 目的：探讨与分析血清CEA、CA19-9联合CRP在消化道恶性肿瘤的诊断价值。方法：2019年8月到2022年5月选择在本院诊治的消化道恶性肿瘤患者150例作为消化道恶性肿瘤组,同期选择在本院体检的健康人群150例作为健康组。采集两组人群的血清癌胚抗原（CEA）、糖类抗原19-9（CA19-9）、C-反应蛋白（CRP）含量,调查患者的病理特征并判断诊断价值。结果：消化道恶性肿瘤组的血清CEA、CA19-9、CRP含量都高于健康组（P<0.05）。消化道恶性肿瘤组的CEA、CA19-9、CRP阳性率为54.7 %、58.7 %、60.7 %,高于健康组的3.3 %、4.0 %、4.7 %（P<0.05）。在消化道恶性肿瘤组中,不同组织学分化、临床分期、淋巴结转移患者的血清CEA、CA19-9、CRP含量对比有差异（P<0.05）。血清CEA、CA19-9联合CRP诊断为阳性113例,在健康组中诊断为阳性3例,血清CEA、CA19-9联合CRP在消化道恶性肿瘤的诊断敏感性与特异性分别为75.3 %（113/150）和98.0 %（147/150）。结论：消化道恶性肿瘤患者多伴随有血清CEA、CA19-9、CRP的高表达,病理特征与血清CEA、CA19-9、CRP含量存在相关性,血清CEA、CA19-9联合CRP在消化道恶性肿瘤的诊断敏感性与特异性都比较好。     

The significance of CA19-9 tumor antigen in the serum of patients with carcinomas

The concentration of serum CA19-9TM in 101 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC), and 109 patients with carcinomas of lung, breast, stomach and pancreas and hepatoma, and 40 normal healthy controls including an equal number of smokers and nonsmokers were determined by solid phase radioimmunoassay of CA19-9 assay kits (Centocor). Of the normal sera, only 1 out of 40 (2.5%) was over 37.6 U/ml. No significant difference of CA19-9 levels was found between smokers (14.4 +/- 9.0 U/ml) and non-smokers (16.0 +/- 10.2 U/ml) of normal control. In patients sera, the mean value of CA19-9 levels was significantly higher in patients with Dukes B (P less than 0.05) and in patients with Dukes C and D (P less than 0.001) than the normal healthy control (15.2 +/- 10.2 U/ml). Analysis of serum CEA concentrations has shown a similar result in patients with all Dukes staged CRC. The CA19-9 levels was also significantly elevated in patients with gastric carcinoma, lung carcinoma, hepatoma, and especially in patients with pancreatic carcinoma (P less than 0.0001). The levels of CA19-9 elevated in 50% (22/44) of patients with advanced CRC while the elevation was 8 of 43 (18.6%) patients with localized CRC. A comparison of CA19-9 and CEA assays showed no correlation (r = 0.125) between the two assays. Although the CA19-9 assay (26.4%) was less sensitive than the CEA assay (51.7%), the specificity of CA19-9 assay (97.5%) was better than that of CEA assay (87.5%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Serum NSE, CEA, CT, CA 15-3 levels in human lung cancer

The significance of neuron specific enolase (NSE) was investigated in comparison with other tumor markers (CEA, CT, CA 15-3) used in the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of lung cancer. As previously described, the calcitonin assay proved to have very low sensitivity for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The serum NSE assay was, however, shown to be a useful diagnostic aid for discrimination between histologically different lung cancers, and therefore this assay may be a valuable tool for treatment monitoring in SCLC patients. CA 15-3, also an unspecific marker, showed similar sensitivity to the NSE assay in SCLC patients, the sensitivity being higher than CEA in non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).     

Clinical significance of serum levels of matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) and its tissue inhibitor (TIMP-2) in gastric cancer

Matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) is able to degrade type IV collagen, and thus plays a key role in the migration of tumor cells. MMP-2 activity is inhibited by its tissue inhibitor (TIMP-2). The imbalance between MMPs and TIMPs may facilitate progression of cancer cells. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical importance of MMP-2 and TIMP-2 to that of classical tumor markers, namely carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA 19-9) in the diagnosis of gastric cancer (GC) by calculating the diagnostic criteria and estimating the levels of MMP-2, TIMP-2, CEA and CA 19-9 in GC patients in relation to clinicopathological features of cancer. We found that serum levels of MMP-2 and TIMP-2 were significantly lower, whereas serum tumor markers were higher, in GC patients than in healthy subjects. Moreover, concentrations of TIMP-2 and CEA correlated with gastric wall infiltration, while CA 19-9 levels correlated with gastric wall infiltration and the presence of nodal metastasis. None of the proteins tested was found to be an independent prognostic factor for GC patients' survival. The percentage of true positive results of TIMP-2 (61%) was higher than those of MMP-2 (54%) and the classical tumor markers CEA (21%) and CA 19-9 (31%). The highest diagnostic sensitivity was observed for the combined use of TIMP-2 with MMP-2 (77%). The results suggest the greater importance of serum MMP-2 and TIMP-2 than of the classical tumor markers CEA and CA 19-9 in the diagnosis of GC. But this issue requires further investigation.     

The clinical relevance of tumor marker CEA, CA 19-9 in regional chemotherapy of hepatic metastases of colorectal carcinoma

Up to December 1986, 50 patients with documented hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma were treated with 5-fluoro-2-deoxyuridine (FUDR) using Infusaid pumps. The response of liver metastases to regional chemotherapy was studied by computerized tomography (CT) and carcino-embryonal antigen (CEA), and/or CA 19-9 antigen serum assays. Preoperative CEA values were pathological in 94% of the patients but only 48% had a pathological concentration of the antigen CA 19-9 of over 37 U/ml. The course of CEA and CA 19-9 in combination with the arterial angio-CT reflected the response of liver metastases to regional chemotherapy. A decrease or normalisation of CEA and CA 19-9 after the beginning of therapy is an indication of partial or complete remission of metastases (68% of the patients showed lowered CEA serum values). If the marker continues to rise in serum this is a danger signal of progression of liver metastases or of extrahepatic tumor spread if the tumor stage in the liver remains unchanged.