Interacting domains of P14-3-3 and actin involved in protein–protein interactions of living cells

14-3-3 proteins are conserved regulatory proteins present in all eukaryotic cells that control numerous cellular activities via targeted protein interactions. To elucidate the interaction between P14-3-3 from Physarum polycephalum and actin in living cells, PCR and DNA recombination were used to generate various P14-3-3 and actin constructs. Yeast two-hybrid assay and FRET were employed to characterize the interaction between P14-3-3 and actin. The two-hybrid assay indicated that P14-3-3 N-terminal 76–108 amino acids and the C-terminal 207–216 amino acids played an important role in mediating interactions with actin, and the actin N-terminal 1–54 amino acids and the C-terminal 326–376 amino acids are also crucial in the interactions with the mPa, a P14-3-3 with mutations at Ser62 (Ser62 → Gly62). Mutations to potential phosphorylation sites did not affect interactions between P14-3-3 and actin. FRET results demonstrated that P14-3-3 co-localized with actin with a FRET efficiency of 22.2% and a distance of 7.4 nm and that P14-3-3 N-terminal 76–108 and C-terminal 207–216 amino acids were important in mediating this interaction, the truncated actin peptides without either the N-terminal 1–54 or C-terminal 326–376 amino acids interacted with P14-3-3, consistent with the results obtained from the yeast two-hybrid assay. Based on data obtained, we identified critical actin and P14-3-3 contact regions.     

Engineering cell signaling modulators from native protein–protein interactions

1. Download : Download high-res image (151KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

SH3 domains: modules of protein–protein interactions

Src homology 3 (SH3) domains are involved in the regulation of important cellular pathways, such as cell proliferation, migration and cytoskeletal modifications. Recognition of polyproline and a number of noncanonical sequences by SH3 domains has been extensively studied by crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance and other methods. High-affinity peptides that bind SH3 domains are used in drug development as candidates for anticancer treatment. This review summarizes the latest achievements in deciphering structural determinants of SH3 function.     

Peptide-based covalent inhibitors of protein–protein interactions

Protein–protein interactions (PPI) are involved in all cellular processes and many represent attractive therapeutic targets. However, the frequently rather flat and large interaction areas render the identification of small molecular PPI inhibitors very challenging. As an alternative, peptide interaction motifs derived from a PPI interface can serve as starting points for the development of inhibitors. However, certain proteins remain challenging targets when applying inhibitors with a competitive mode of action. For that reason, peptide-based ligands with an irreversible binding mode have gained attention in recent years. This review summarizes examples of covalent inhibitors that employ peptidic binders and have been tested in a biological context.     

Comparative mapping of host–pathogen protein–protein interactions

1. Download : Download high-res image (177KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Chemoproteomic profiling of protein–metabolite interactions

Small molecule metabolites play important roles in regulating protein functions, which are acted through either covalent non-enzymatic post-translational modifications or non-covalent binding interactions. Chemical proteomic strategies can help delineate global landscapes of cellular protein–metabolite interactions and provide molecular insights about their mechanisms of action. In this review, we summarized the recent progress in developments and applications of chemoproteomic strategies to profile protein–metabolite interactions.     

Assessment and significance of protein–protein interactions during development of protein biopharmaceuticals

Early development of protein biotherapeutics using recombinant DNA technology involved progress in the areas of cloning, screening, expression and recovery/purification. As the biotechnology industry matured, resulting in marketed products, a greater emphasis was placed on development of formulations and delivery systems requiring a better understanding of the chemical and physical properties of newly developed protein drugs. Biophysical techniques such as analytical ultracentrifugation, dynamic and static light scattering, and circular dichroism were used to study protein–protein interactions during various stages of development of protein therapeutics. These studies included investigation of protein self-association in many of the early development projects including analysis of highly glycosylated proteins expressed in mammalian CHO cell cultures. Assessment of protein–protein interactions during development of an IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds to IgE were important in understanding the pharmacokinetics and dosing for this important biotherapeutic used to treat severe allergic IgE-mediated asthma. These studies were extended to the investigation of monoclonal antibody–antigen interactions in human serum using the fluorescent detection system of the analytical ultracentrifuge. Analysis by sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation was also used to investigate competitive binding to monoclonal antibody targets. Recent development of high concentration protein formulations for subcutaneous administration of therapeutics posed challenges, which resulted in the use of dynamic and static light scattering, and preparative analytical ultracentrifugation to understand the self-association and rheological properties of concentrated monoclonal antibody solutions.     

Dynamic regulation of lipid–protein interactions

We review the importance of helix motions for the function of several important categories of membrane proteins and for the properties of several model molecular systems. For voltage-gated potassium or sodium channels, sliding, tilting and/or rotational movements of the S4 helix accompanied by a swapping of cognate side-chain ion-pair interactions regulate the channel gating. In the seven-helix G protein-coupled receptors, exemplified by the rhodopsins, collective helix motions serve to activate the functional signaling. Peptides which initially associate with lipid-bilayer membrane surfaces may undergo dynamic transitions from surface-bound to tilted-transmembrane orientations, sometimes accompanied by changes in the molecularity, formation of a pore or, more generally, the activation of biological function. For single-span membrane proteins, such as the tyrosine kinases, an interplay between juxtamembrane and transmembrane domains is likely to be crucial for the regulation of dimer assembly that in turn is associated with the functional responses to external signals. Additionally, we note that experiments with designed single-span transmembrane helices offer fundamental insights into the molecular features that govern protein–lipid interactions.This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Lipid–protein interactions.     

Peptides and peptidomimetics as regulators of protein–protein interactions

1. Download : Download high-res image (114KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Alternative modulation of protein–protein interactions by small molecules

1. Download : Download high-res image (97KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Automated feature engineering improves prediction of protein–protein interactions

Amino Acids - Over the last decade, various machine learning (ML) and statistical approaches for protein–protein interaction (PPI) predictions have been developed to help annotating...