The effect of ethanol on prolactin secretion in vitro

In order to investigate the action of ethanol on the anterior pituitary gland, the effect of ethanol on prolactin secretion in vitro was studied. Ethanol significantly increased the in vitro incorporation of ³H-leucine into both prolactin contained within the pituitary gland and that released into the medium. The enhancement of ³H labelled-prolactin synthesis induced by ethanol was suppressed by cycloheximide. These results support the hypothesis that ethanol stimulates the in vitro synthesis and release of prolactin by the pituitary gland.     

Tachykinins and the control of prolactin secretion

Tachykinins are present in the pituitary gland and in brain areas involved in the control of the secretion of pituitary hormones. Tachykinins have been demonstrated to stimulate prolactin release acting directly on the anterior pituitary gland. These peptides have also been revealed to be able to act at the hypothalamic level, interacting with neurotransmitters and neuropeptides that have the potential to affect prolactin secretion. Tachykinins seem to act by stimulating or inhibiting the release of the factors that affect prolactin secretion. Among them, tachykinins have been demonstrated to stimulate oxytocin and vasopressin release, which in turn results in prolactin release. Tachykinins also potentiated the response to vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and reinforced the action of glutamate, which in turn result in prolactin release. They have also been shown to interact with serotonin, a neurotransmitter involved in the control of prolactin secretion. In addition, tachykinins have been shown to inhibit GABA release, a neurotransmitter with prolactin-release inhibiting effect. This inhibition may result in an increased prolactin secretion by removal of the GABA inhibition. On the other hand, tachykinins have also been shown to stimulate dopamine release by the hypothalamus, an action that results in an inhibition of prolactin release. Dopamine is a well known inhibitor of prolactin secretion. In conclusion, although tachykinins have been shown to have a predominantly stimulatory effect on prolactin secretion, especially at the pituitary level, under some circumstances they may also exert an inhibitory influence on prolactin release, by stimulating dopamine release at the hypothalamic level.     

Inhibition of prolactin secretion by a direct effect of methysergide on the pituitary lactotrophs in the rat

Methysergide administered i.p. caused a dose dependent decrease of serum prolactin levels in rats of both sexes bearing large bilateral electrolytic lesions in the median eminence. This prolactin release inhibiting action of methysergide was prevented by pretreatment of the animals with dopamine receptor blockers pimozide or spiroperidol, which by themselves had no effect on serum prolactin levels. Similar results were observed when the dopamine receptor agonist piribedil was used instead of methysergide. It is concluded that methysergide is capable of inhibiting prolactin secretion by activation of dopamine receptors of the pituitary lactotrophs.     

Influence of dopamine and thyrotropin releasing hormone on the volume of nuclei of prolactin cells in rat adenohypophysis in vitro.

The effect of dopamine and TRH on the volume of prolactin cells nuclei in the rat anterior pituitary cultured in vitro has been investigated. A significant increase of volume of prolactin cells nuclei exposed to TRH has been shown. Dopamine had no significant influence on the volume of the nuclei of prolactin cells. The prolactin cells exposed to dopamine showed clearly an increased granulation. The obtained results suggest that dopamine exerts a stronger inhibiting effect on the release of prolactin than on its synthesis.     

Effect of morphine, beta-endorphin and leu-enkephalin on 3H-spiroperidol binding to bovine pituitary membranes.

The ability of morphine, leu-enkephalin and β-endorphin to antagonize the binding of ³H-spiroperidol to bovine anterior pituitary membranes was studied. All three drugs were virtually inactive despite their ability to stimulate prolactin secretion $\text{in}$$\text{vivo}$ and the reported ability of morphine to antagonize the inhibitory effect of dopamine on prolactin release from rat hemi-pituitaries. These results suggest that opiates do not produce their direct effect on prolactin secreation at the pituitary level through an effect on the ³H-spiroperidol binding site. The opiates may antagonize the effect of dopamine at a component of the dopamine receptor which is independent of the ³H-spiroperidol binding site, or the opiates may stimulate prolactin secretion by an effect on the lactotrophes which is independent of dopamine.     

The dopamine of the rat mammotroph in cell culture as a model for drug action

Dopamine can act directly on pituitary cells to inhibit prolactin release. This action can be blocked by dopamine receptor blocking drugs such as haloperidol, sulpiride and other neuroleptic agents. Comparison of the properties of the mammotroph dopamine receptor with the adenylate cyclase linked dopamine receptor of the limbic forebrain reveals some obvious differences. For example, dopamine receptor stimulants such as S-584 and lergotrile mesylate are inactive in stimulating the adenylate cyclase preparations but are potent in inhibiting pituitary prolactin secretion. Such inhibition of prolactin secretion can be reversed by haloperidol or sulpiride. In contrast to these observations, sulpiride does not block dopamine stimulation of cAMP formation. In addition, dopamine, apomorphine or lergotrile mesylate have no effect on a pituitary adenylate cyclase preparation and dopamine fails to elevate cAMP in the intact cells in culture. Despite the similarity between these two dopamine sensitive systems with respect to a number of agonists and antagonists, the exceptions described suggest that the pituitary system with further study may offer some greater reliability as a predictive test for clinically useful agents. These results also suggest that the receptors for dopamine, like that for norepinephrine, are of two types, only one of which is coupled to adenylate cyclase.     

Enkephalins and pituitary hormone release: modification of responsiveness to LHRH.

An intraperitoneal injection of leucine-enkephalin into rats stimulates gonadotropin and prolactin release. To elucidate the mechanism of this releasing property of leucine-enkephalin, rat hemipituitaries were incubated with either enkephalin alone or enkephalin in combination with OHRH. Enkephalin alone had no effect on LH or prolactin release in vitro but potentiated the LH response to LHRH. Neither leucine-enkephalin nor LHRH alone had an effect on GH release; however, when combined, a GH response to LHRH occurred. These results suggest that leucine-enkephalin can modify the pituitary responsiveness to certain hypothalamic releasing hormones by a direct pituitary action.     

Evidence for a coupling of prolactin secretion and synthesis by rat pituitary cells in culture

The relationship between the release and the synthesis of prolactin by rat pituitary cells in culture was studied using a microtubule-disrupting drug, vinblastine. (1) Prolactin secretion was inhibited by vinblastine in short-term incubations. Vinblastine did not act via the dopamine pathway, since a potent anti-dopaminergic drug, fluphenazine, was unable to reverse the inhibiting action of the antimicrotubular agent. (2) Continuous treatment by vinblastine induced a progressive decrease of the rate of incorporation of [3H]leucine in prolactin. The half-inhibition time was about 2 days. This inhibition of prolactin synthesis was selective, since total protein synthesis remained unaffected. (3) Measurements of radioimmunoassayable prolactin showed that the inhibition of hormone release by vinblastine led to a transient increase of the intracellular content of prolactin. The phase of over-accumulation was followed by a progressive reduction of the total (cell + medium) prolactin. This result is in agreement with the observed inhibition of de novo synthesis of prolactin and indicates that a degradation process takes place in pituitary cells in culture. In conclusion, the use of vinblastine allows us to demonstrate that the rate of prolactin synthesis is dependent upon the secretory status of the cell.     

Evidence for a coupling of prolactin secretion and synthesis by rat pituitary cells in culture

The relationship between the release and the synthesis of prolactin by rat pituitary cells in culture was studied using a microtubule-disrupting drug, vinblastine. (1) Prolactin secretion was inhibited by vinblastine in short-term incubations. Vinblastine did not act via the dopamine pathway, since a potent anti-dopaminergic drug, fluphenazine, was unable to reverse the inhibiting action of the antimicrotubular agent. (2) Continuous treatment by vinblastine induced a progressive decrease of the rate of incorporation of [³H]leucine in prolactin. The half-inhibition time was about 2 days. This inhibition of prolactin synthesis was selective, since total protein synthesis remained unaffected. (3) Measurements of radioimmunoassayable prolactin showed that the inhibition of hormone release by vinblastine led to a transient increase of the intracellular content of prolactin. The phase of over-accumulation was followed by a progressive reduction of the total (cell + medium) prolactin. This result is in agreement with the observed inhibition of de novo synthesis of prolactin and indicates that a degradation process takes place in pituitary cells in culture. In conclusion, the use of vinblastine allows us to demonstrate that the rate of prolactin synthesis is dependent upon the secretory status of the cell.     

The effects of dopamine on prolactin mRNA levels in rat pituitary cells in culture.

Dopamine is known to be the prolactin-release inhibiting factor, but the effects of dopamine itself on regulation of prolactin messenger RNA have been little studied because of the instability of dopamine. We have compared the effects of dopamine and bromocriptine on the levels of prolactin mRNA and on the rates of synthesis, storage, and release of prolactin in primary cultured rat pituitary cells. The cells were incubated for 72 h with no secretagogue (control group) or in the presence of either dopamine (10 mumol/L) plus ascorbic acid (100 mumol/L) or bromocriptine (0.1 mumol/L). Prolactin mRNA was measured in cell extracts by means of slot blots, and newly synthesized prolactin was measured in similar incubations by the addition of [3H]leucine, followed by gel electrophoresis. The levels of total prolactin were measured by radioimmunoassay. Prolactin mRNA was reduced to 78 +/- 9% (mean +/- SEM) of control levels in bromocriptine-treated cells and to 59 +/- 7% in dopamine-treated cells, demonstrating that dopamine stabilized by ascorbic acid was able to reduce the levels of prolactin mRNA in rat pituitary cells in culture. Dopamine may act at sites in addition to the dopaminergic D2 receptor, since the level of prolactin mRNA was reduced more by a supramaximal dose of dopamine than by a supramaximal dose of bromocriptine. The results of the [3H]prolactin and prolactin measurements suggested that availability of mRNA was not a major factor in controlling the rate of prolactin synthesis.     

Oestrogen and progesterone interactions in the control of gonadotrophin and prolactin secretion

Oestrogen and progesterone have marked effects on the secretion of the gonadotrophins and prolactin. During most of the oestrous or menstrual cycle the secretion of gonadotrophin is maintained at a relatively low level by the negative feedback of oestrogen and progesterone on the hypothalamic-pituitary system. The spontaneous ovulatory surge of gonadotrophin is produced by a positive feedback cascade. The cascade is initiated by an increase in the plasma concentration of oestradiol-17 beta which triggers a surge of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) and an increase in pituitary responsiveness to LHRH. The facilitatory action of oestrogen on pituitary responsiveness is reinforced by progesterone and the priming effect of LHRH. How oestrogen and progesterone exert their effects is not clear but the facilitatory effects of oestrogen take about 24 h, and the stimulation of LHRH release is produced by an indirect effect of oestradiol on neurons which are possibly opioid, dopaminergic or noradrenergic and which modulate the activity of LHRH neurons. In the rat, a spontaneous prolactin surge occurs at the same time as the spontaneous ovulatory gonadotrophin surge. The prolactin surge also appears to involve a positive feedback between the brain-pituitary system and the ovary. However, the mechanism of the prolactin surge is poorly understood mainly because the neural control of prolactin release appears to be mediated by prolactin inhibiting as well as releasing factors, and the precise role of these factors has not been established. The control of prolactin release is further complicated by the fact that oestradiol stimulates prolactin synthesis and release by a direct action on the prolactotrophes. Prolactin and gonadotrophin surges also occur simultaneously in several experimental steroid models. A theoretical model is proposed which could explain how oestrogen and progesterone trigger the simultaneous surge of LH and prolactin.     

Further studies on the effect of cimetidine and other neurotropic drugs on rat serum prolactin

The hyperprolactinemic effect of H2 histamine receptor antagonists has been described in the rat and in humans. The present study was undertaken to explore more fully the hyperprolactinemic action of cimetidine, and its interrelationship with other neurotropic agents. Adult ovariectomized estrogen-primed rats were injected with mepiramine, diphenhydramine, pilocarpine, atropine, dopamine, cimetidine or saline as control, at different sequences and the effect on serum prolactin was determined. The effect of cimetidine on prolactin release "in vitro" by hemipituitaries of estrogenized male rats during a short time incubation period, was also investigated. Our results indicate that cimetidine is able to release prolactin and that this effect is not prevented by atropine or the classical antihistaminergic agents mepiramine and diphenhydramine. Both pilocarpine and dopamine inhibit the prolactin release due to cimetidine. The hypoprolactinemic action of pilocarpine was completely blocked by atropine, but not by mepiramine or diphenhydramine. Finally, cimetidine was unable to modify significantly the prolactin release by incubated pituitaries. It is postulated that cimetidine acts mainly at the brain and that the hyperprolactinemic effect is not mediated by muscarinic or H1 histaminergic receptors. This action can be prevented by drugs such as dopamine that are able to act on the lactotroph, and also by pilocarpine, probably by stimulating a prolactin inhibiting pathway.     

Does the hypothalamic tyrosine-hydroxylase inhibition mediate the positive feedback of progesterone on gonadotropin release in women?

Neuropharmacological studies suggest a common inhibitory role for the hypothalamic dopaminergic pathway on gonadotropin and prolactin pituitary release, in humans. As a consequence, it has been hypothesized that the inhibition of hypothalamic tyrosine-hydroxylase and the subsequent fall in dopamine synthesis is involved in the positive feedback of progesterone on LH and PRL pituitary release in estrogen-primed hypogonadal women. The aim of our study was to verify whether an inhibition of tyrosine-hydroxylase may really account for the progesterone action on gonadotropin and prolactin secretion. For this purpose, we compared the effect of a specific tyrosine-hydroxylase inhibitor (alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine, AMPT) with the effect of progesterone on gonadotropin and prolactin release in estrogen-primed postmenopausal women. Progesterone induced a marked release of LH (delta: 129.7 +/- 16.5 mlU/ml, mean +/- SE) and a slight increase in FSH (delta: 39.4 +/- 11.6 mlU/ml) and PRL (delta: 15.3 +/- 2.8 ng/ml) serum levels. Acute or two-day administration of AMPT was followed by a marked rise in PRL serum levels (delta: 82.9 +/- 13.8 and 88.3 +/- 8.2 ng/ml, respectively) while there were no significant increases in serum LH (delta: 5.4 +/- 2.6 and 3.3 +/- 4.6 mlU/ml) and FSH (delta: 3.4 +/- 0.9 and -0.4 +/- 2.9) concentrations. The ineffectiveness of a specific tyrosine-hydroxylase inhibitor in simulating the progesterone effect on gonadotropin secretion seems to negate the hypothesis that a reduction in hypothalamic dopaminergic activity mediates the positive feedback of progesterone on gonadotropin release.     

Responses of growth hormone to metoclopramide in normal women and amenorrheic women with or without hyperprolactinemia

Response of growth hormone (GH) release to metoclopramide (MCP), a dopamine antagonist, was evaluated in normal women, hyperprolactinemic-amenorrheic patients with pituitary microadenoma and normoprolactinemic-amenorrheic patients. Mean basal concentrations of serum GH and prolactin (PRL) in amenorrheic patients were not significantly different from those in normal women except PRL concentrations in hyperprolactinemic patients. Serum GH concentrations significantly increased after MCP administration in normal women and normoprolactinemic-amenorrheic patients, but not in hyperprolactinemic patients. Dopamine causes modest and transient GH secretion in some subjects. Therefore MCP is not likely to stimulate GH secretion through its effect as a dopamine antagonist, and the mechanism of action of MCP on GH secretion is not known. Although the cause of the absence of GH response to MCP in hyperprolactinemic patients is unclear, it may be related to the increased hypothalamic dopaminergic tone which is operative in such patients or it may reflect a direct action of PRL on hypothalamic-pituitary GH regulation.     

Evidence that pimozide is not a partial agonist of dopamine receptors.

The dopamine receptor antagonist pimozide, at concentrations up to 10 nM, competitively antagonized the inhibitory action of a pomorphine on prolactin (PRL) secretion by cultured rat pituitary cells. At higher concentrations pimozide as well as the analogues clopimozide and penfluridol suppressed PRL secretion. The latter effect could not be reversed by dopamine antagonists devoid of intrinsic effects on PRL release. Suppression of PRL release was also observed with compounds which were devoid of dopamine receptor agonistic or antagonistic properties such as R 6694 and R 5052, structurally related to pimozide, and also with loperamide. The inhibitory action of pimozide on PRL release resembled that of the calcium antagonist flunarizine. Concentration effect curves showed parallel slopes and the effect of both compounds could be reversed by increasing the concentration of calcium ions (Ca²⁺). Both flunarizine and pimozide were also capable of inhibiting releasing factor-stimulated luteinizing hormone secretion, an effect not shared by apomorphine. Pimozide and the various structurally related compounds used, also antagonized Ca²⁺-induced smooth muscle contractions of the isolated caudal artery of the rat.The present findings indicate that pimozide is a competitive antagonist without partial agonistic activity on apomorphine-sensitive dopamine receptors in the pituitary and that its inhibitory effect on PRL release as well as on vascular smooth muscle contractions is due to interference with a Ca²⁺-dependent mechanism of the stimulus-effect coupling process.     

Cimetidine and hyperprolactinemia

Plasma TSH was determined in 12 normal subjects before and after administration of mg 400 of cimetidine i.v., an H2-receptor antagonist. TSH concentration remained unchanged. In 7 normal subjects, pretreated with bromocriptine; variation of plasma prolactin were studied before and after administration of mg 400 and 800 of cimetidine. Bromocriptine inhibited the increase of prolactin secretion, induced by cimetidine. It can be assumed that: a) cimetidine doesn't release hypothalamic TRH in portal vessels; b) that drug has no direct effect on pituitary cells; c) hypothalamic H2-receptor blockade by cimetidine decreases dopamine release from hypothalamus to pituitary gland.     

Dopaminergic mediation of Y-aminobutyric acid in the control of prolactin release: Plasma prolactin and brain tyrosine hydroxylase levels in ovariectomized conscious rats

The present experiments were carried out to further elucidate the mechanism by which dopamine mediates the actions of Y-aminobutyric acid on prolactin release from anterior pituitary following its intraventricular injection in overiectomized conscious rats, Y-Aminobutyric acid significantly suppressed the prolactin levels at 0.1 Μmol concentration while at 4 Μmol dose, the level was elevated. The activity of tyrosine hydroxylase was increased significantly in the anterior pituitary at the lower dose while the higher concentration of Y-aminobutyric acid did not bring about any change in the activity both in the hypothalamus and the anterior pituitary. The results presented suggest that intracellular dopamine in the anterior pituitary may directly inhibit prolactin release; the plasma prolactin level is elevated by Y-aminobutyric acid, by way of either inhibiting dopaminergic tone or possible stimulation of a physiological prolactin releasin g hormone.     

Relation of endogenous opioid peptides and morphine to neuroendocrine functions.

Morphine and the endogenous opioid peptides (EOP) exert similar effects on the neuroendocrine system. When adminstered acutely, they stimulate growth hormone (GH), prolactin (PRL), and adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) release, and inhibit release of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH),and thyrotropin (TSH). Recent studies indicate that the EOP probably have a physiological role in regulating pituitary hormone secretion. Thus injection of naloxone (opiate antagonist) alone in rats resulted in a rapid fall in serum concentrations of GH and PRL, and a rise in serum LH and FSH, suggesting that the EOP help maintain basal secretion of these hormones. Prior administration of naloxone or naltrexon inhibited stress-induced PRL release, and elevated serum LH in castrated male rats to greater than normal castrate levels. Studies on the mechanisms of action of the EOP and morphine on hormone secretion indicate that they have no direct effect on the pituitary, but act via the hypothalamus. There is no evidence that the EOP or morphine alter the action of the hypothalamic hypophysiotropic hormones on pituitary hormone secretion; they probably act via hypothalamic neurotransmitters to influence release of the hypothalamic hormones into the pituitary portal vessels. Preliminary observations indicate that they may increase serotonin and decrease dopamine metabolism in the hypothalamus, which could account for practically all of their effects on pituitary hormone secretion.     

Some calcium and lysosome antagonists inhibit 3H-spirerone binding to the porcine anterior pituitary

The dopamine antagonist ³H-spiperone binds to dopamine receptors in crude membrane preparations of the porcine anterior pituitary. In competition studies, several calcium channel antagonists (bepridil, D600 and verapamil) and a lysosomal enzyme inhibitor (chloroquine) displaced spiperone binding in a dose related manner. Because dopamine receptor activity modulates prolactin release from the anterior pituitary, it is suggested that the previously observed effects of some of these agents on prolactin release or storage may have been initiated at the level of the dopamine receptor or through physical modifications of the plasma membrane rather than the calcium channel or lysosome.