Effect of introducing a short amyloidogenic sequence from the Aβ peptide at the N‐terminus of 18‐residue amphipathic helical peptides

Fibril formation is the hallmark of pathogenesis in Alzheimer's disease and other amyloid disorders caused by conformational alterations leading to the aggregation of soluble monomers. Aβ40 self‐associates to form amyloid fibrils. Its central seven‐residue segment KLVFFAE (Aβ16–22), which is thought to be crucial for fibril formation of the full‐length peptide, forms fibrils even in isolation. Context‐dependent induction of amyloid formation by such sequences in peptides, which otherwise do not have that propensity, is of considerable interest. We have examined the effect of introducing the Aβ16–22 sequence at the N‐terminus of two amphipathic helical 18‐residue peptides Ac‐WYSEMKRNVQRLERAIEE‐am and Ac‐KQLIRFLKRLDRNLWGLA‐am, which have high average hydrophobic moment <μH> values but have net charges of 0 and +4, respectively, at neutral pH. Upon incubation in aqueous buffer, fibril‐like aggregates were discernible by transmission electron microscopy for the peptide with only 0 net charge, which also displayed ThT binding and β‐structure. Although both the sequences have been derived from amphipathic helical segments in globular proteins and possess high average hydrophobic moments, the +4 charge peptide lacks the ability to form fibrils, while the peptide with 0 charge has the tendency to form fibrillar structures. Variation in the net charge and the presence of several glutamic acids in the sequence of the peptide with net charge 0 appear to favor the formation of fibrils when the Aβ16–22 sequence is attached at the N‐terminus. Copyright © 2011 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Dissecting the behaviour of β‐amyloid peptide variants during oligomerization and fibrillation

The oligomerization and fibrillation of β‐amyloid (Aβ) peptides are important events in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. However, the motifs within the Aβ sequence that contribute to oligomerization and fibrillation and the complex interplay among these short motifs are unclear. In this study, the oligomerization and fibrillation abilities of the Aβ variants Aβ1–28, Aβ1–36, Aβ11–42, Aβ17–42, Aβ1–40 and Aβ1–42 were examined by thioflavin T fluorescence, western blotting and transmission electron microscopy. Compared with two C‐terminal‐truncated peptides (i.e. Aβ1–28 and Aβ1–36), Aβ11–42, Aβ17–42 and Aβ1–42 had stronger abilities to form oligomers. This indicated that amino acids 37–42 strengthen the β‐hairpin structure of Aβ. Both Aβ1–42 and Aβ1–40 could form fibres, but Aβ17–42 formed irregular fibres, suggesting that amino acids 1–17 were essential for Aβ fibre formation. Aβ1–28 and Aβ1–36 exhibited weak oligomerization and fibrillation, implying that they formed an unstable β‐hairpin structure owing to the incomplete C‐terminal region. Intermediate peptides were likely to form a stable structure, consistent with previous results. This work explains the roles and interplay among motifs within Aβ during oligomerization and fibrillation. Copyright © 2017 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Morphology of self‐assembled structures formed by short peptides from the amyloidogenic protein tau depends on the solvent in which the peptides are dissolved

The aggregation behavior of peptides Ac‐VQIVYK‐amide (AcPHF6) and Ac‐QIVYK‐amide (AcPHF5) from the amyloidogenic protein tau was examined by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and fluorescence microscopy. Although AcPHF5 did not show enhancement of thioflavin T (ThT) fluorescence in aqueous buffer, distinct aggregates were discernible when peptide was dissolved in organic solvents such as methanol (MeOH), trifluoroethanol (TFE), and hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP) dried on mica and examined by AFM. Self‐association was evident even though the peptide did not have the propensity to form secondary structures in the organic solvents. In dried films, the peptide adopts predominantly β‐conformation which results in the formation of distinct aggregates. ThT fluorescence spectra and fluorescence images indicate the formation of fibrils when AcPHF6 solutions in organic solvents were diluted into buffer. AcPHF6 had the ability to organize into fibrillar structures when AFM samples were prepared from peptide dissolved in MeOH, TFE, HFIP, and also when diluted into buffer. AcPHF6 showed propensity for β‐structure in aqueous buffer. In MeOH and TFE, AcPHF6 showed helical and β‐structure. Morphology of the fibrils was dependent on peptide conformation in the organic solvents. The structures observed for AcPHF6 are formed rapidly and long incubation periods in the solvents are not necessary. The structures with varying morphologies observed for AcPHF5 and AcPHF6 appear to be mediated by surfaces such as mica and the organic solvents used for dissolution of the peptides. Copyright © 2009 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Seeded strain‐like transmission of β‐amyloid morphotypes in APP transgenic mice

The polymorphic β‐amyloid lesions present in individuals with Alzheimer's disease are collectively known as cerebral β‐amyloidosis. Amyloid precursor protein (APP) transgenic mouse models similarly develop β‐amyloid depositions that differ in morphology, binding of amyloid conformation‐sensitive dyes, and Aβ40/Aβ42 peptide ratio. To determine the nature of such β‐amyloid morphotypes, β‐amyloid‐containing brain extracts from either aged APP23 brains or aged APPPS1 brains were intracerebrally injected into the hippocampus of young APP23 or APPPS1 transgenic mice. APPPS1 brain extract injected into young APP23 mice induced β‐amyloid deposition with the morphological, conformational, and Aβ40/Aβ42 ratio characteristics of β‐amyloid deposits in aged APPPS1 mice, whereas APP23 brain extract injected into young APP23 mice induced β‐amyloid deposits with the characteristics of β‐amyloid deposits in aged APP23 mice. Injecting the two extracts into the APPPS1 host revealed a similar difference between the induced β‐amyloid deposits, although less prominent, and the induced deposits were similar to the β‐amyloid deposits found in aged APPPS1 hosts. These results indicate that the molecular composition and conformation of aggregated Aβ in APP transgenic mice can be maintained by seeded conversion.     

Structural analysis of the pyroglutamate‐modified isoform of the Alzheimer's disease‐related amyloid‐β using NMR spectroscopy

The aggregation of the Aβ plays a fundamental role in the pathology of AD. Recently, N‐terminally modified Aβ species, pE‐Aβ, have been described as major constituents of Aβ deposits in the brains of AD patients. pE‐Aβ has an increased aggregation propensity and shows increased toxicity compared with Aβ1‐40 and Aβ1‐42. In the present work, high‐resolution NMR spectroscopy was performed to study pE‐Aβ3‐40 in aqueous TFE‐containing solution. Two‐dimensional TOCSY and NOESY experiments were performed. On the basis of NOE and chemical shift data, pE‐Aβ3‐40 was shown to contain two helical regions formed by residues 14–22 and 30–36. This is similar as previously described for Aβ1‐40. However, the secondary chemical shift data indicate decreased helical propensity in pE‐Aβ3‐40 when compared with Aβ1‐40 under exactly the same conditions. This is in agreement with the observation that pE‐Aβ3‐40 shows a drastically increased tendency to form β‐sheet‐rich structures under more physiologic conditions. Structural studies of pE‐Aβ are crucial for better understanding the structural basis of amyloid fibril formation in the brain during development of AD, especially because an increasing number of reports indicate a decisive role of pE‐Aβ for the pathogenesis of AD. Copyright © 2012 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Differential physiologic responses of α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors to β‐amyloid1–40 and β‐amyloid1–42

The β‐amyloid peptides (Aβ), Aβ_1–40 and Aβ_1–42, have been implicated in Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. Although Aβ_1–42 is generally considered to be the pathological peptide in AD, both Aβ_1–40 and Aβ_1–42 have been used in a variety of experimental models without discrimination. Here we show that monomeric or oligomeric forms of the two Aβ peptides, when interact with the neuronal cation channel, α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (α7nAChR), would result in distinct physiologic responses as measured by acetylcholine release and calcium influx experiments. While Aβ_1–42 effectively attenuated these α7nAChR‐dependent physiology to an extent that was apparently irreversible, Aβ_1–40 showed a lower inhibitory activity that could be restored upon washings with physiologic buffers or treatment with α7nAChR antagonists. Our data suggest a clear pharmacological distinction between Aβ_1–40 and Aβ_1–42. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Neurobiol 55: 25–30, 2003     

Probing the role of aromatic residues in the self-assembly of Aβ(16–22) in fluorinated alcohols and their aqueous mixtures

The Aβ(16–22) sequence KLVFFAE spans the hydrophobic core of the Aβ peptide and plays an important role in its self-assembly. Apart from forming amyloid fibrils, Aβ(16–22) can self-associate into highly ordered nanotubes and ribbon-like structures depending on the composition of solvent used for dissolution. The Aβ(16–22) sequence which has FF at the 19th and 20th positions would be a good model to investigate peptide self-assembly in the context of aromatic interactions. In this study, self-assembly of Aβ(16–22) and its aromatic analogs obtained by replacement of F19, F20 or both by Y or W was examined after dissolution in fluorinated alcohols and their aqueous mixtures in solvent cluster forming conditions. The results indicate that the presence of aromatic residues Y and W and their position in the sequence plays an important role in self-assembly. We observe the formation of amyloid fibrils and other self-assembled structures such as spheres, rings and beads. Our results indicate that 20% HFIP is more favourable for amyloid fibril formation as compared to 20% TFE, when F is replaced with Y or W. The dissolution of peptides in DMSO followed by evaporation of solvent and dissolution in water appears to greatly influence peptide conformation, morphology and cross-β content of self-assembled structures. Our study shows that positioning of aromatic residues F, Y and W have an important role in directing self-assembly of the peptides.     

Basic conformers in β‐peptides

The conformation of oligomers of β‐amino acids of the general type Ac‐[β‐Xaa]_n‐NHMe (β‐Xaa = β‐Ala, β‐Aib, and β‐Abu; n = 1–4) was systematically examined at different levels of ab initio molecular orbital theory (HF/6‐31G*, HF/3‐21G). The solvent influence was considered employing two quantum‐mechanical self‐consistent reaction field models. The results show a wide variety of possibilities for the formation of characteristic elements of secondary structure in β‐peptides. Most of them can be derived from the monomer units of blocked β‐peptides with n = 1. The stability and geometries of the β‐peptide structures are considerably influenced by the side‐chain positions, by the configurations at the C^α‐ and C^β‐atoms of the β‐amino acid constituents, and especially by environmental effects. Structure peculiarities of β‐peptides, in particular those of various helix alternatives, are discussed in relation to typical elements of secondary structure in α‐peptides. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Biopoly 50: 167–184, 1999     

Exploring the free energy landscape of a model β‐hairpin peptide and its isoform

Secondary structural transitions from α‐helix to β‐sheet conformations are observed in several misfolding diseases including Alzheimer's and Parkinson's. Determining factors contributing favorably to the formation of each of these secondary structures is therefore essential to better understand these disease states. β‐hairpin peptides form basic components of anti‐parallel β‐sheets and are suitable model systems for characterizing the fundamental forces stabilizing β‐sheets in fibrillar structures. In this study, we explore the free energy landscape of the model β‐hairpin peptide GB1 and its E2 isoform that preferentially adopts α‐helical conformations at ambient conditions. Umbrella sampling simulations using all‐atom models and explicit solvent are performed over a large range of end‐to‐end distances. Our results show the strong preference of GB1 and the E2 isoform for β‐hairpin and α‐helical conformations, respectively, consistent with previous studies. We show that the unfolded states of GB1 are largely populated by misfolded β‐hairpin structures which differ from each other in the position of the β‐turn. We discuss the energetic factors contributing favorably to the formation of α‐helix and β‐hairpin conformations in these peptides and highlight the energetic role of hydrogen bonds and non‐bonded interactions. Proteins 2014; 82:2394–2402. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Self-Assembly of Aβ40, Aβ42 and Aβ43 Peptides in Aqueous Mixtures of Fluorinated Alcohols

Fluorinated alcohols such as hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP) and trifluoroethanol (TFE) have the ability to promote α-helix and β-hairpin structure in proteins and peptides. HFIP has been used extensively to dissolve various amyloidogenic proteins and peptides including Aβ, in order to ensure their monomeric status. In this paper, we have investigated the self-assembly of Aβ40, Aβ42, and Aβ43 in aqueous mixtures of fluorinated alcohols from freshly dissolved stock solutions in HFIP. We have observed that formation of fibrillar and non-fibrillar structures are dependent on the solvent composition. Peptides form fibrils with ease when reconstituted in deionized water from freshly dissolved HFIP stocks. In aqueous mixtures of fluorinated alcohols, either predominant fibrillar structures or clustered aggregates were observed. Aqueous mixtures of 20% HFIP are more favourable for Aβ fibril formation as compared to 20% TFE. When Aβ40, Aβ42, and Aβ43 stocks in HFIP are diluted in 50% aqueous mixtures in phosphate buffer or deionized water followed by slow evaporation of HFIP, Aβ peptides form fibrils in phosphate buffer and deionized water. The clustered structures could be off-pathway aggregates. Aβ40, Aβ42, and Aβ43 showed significant α-helical content in freshly dissolved HFIP stocks. The α-helical conformational intermediate in Aβ40, Aβ42, and Aβ43 could favour the formation of both fibrillar and non-fibrillar aggregates depending on solvent conditions and rate of α-helical to β-sheet transition.     

Geometrical principles of homomeric β‐barrels and β‐helices: Application to modeling amyloid protofilaments

Examples of homomeric β‐helices and β‐barrels have recently emerged. Here we generalize the theory for the shear number in β‐barrels to encompass β‐helices and homomeric structures. We introduce the concept of the “β‐strip,” the set of parallel or antiparallel neighboring strands, from which the whole helix can be generated giving it n‐fold rotational symmetry. In this context, the shear number is interpreted as the sum around the helix of the fixed register shift between neighboring identical β‐strips. Using this approach, we have derived relationships between helical width, pitch, angle between strand direction and helical axis, mass per length, register shift, and number of strands. The validity and unifying power of the method is demonstrated with known structures including α‐hemolysin, T4 phage spike, cylindrin, and the HET‐s(218‐289) prion. From reported dimensions measured by X‐ray fiber diffraction on amyloid fibrils, the relationships can be used to predict the register shift and the number of strands within amyloid protofilaments. This was used to construct models of transthyretin and Alzheimer β(40) amyloid protofilaments that comprise a single strip of in‐register β‐strands folded into a “β‐strip helix.” Results suggest both stabilization of an individual β‐strip helix and growth by addition of further β‐strip helices can involve the same pair of sequence segments associating with β‐sheet hydrogen bonding at the same register shift. This process would be aided by a repeat sequence. Hence, understanding how the register shift (as the distance between repeat sequences) relates to helical dimensions will be useful for nanotube design.     

β‐Amino acids containing peptides and click‐cyclized peptide as β‐turn mimics: a comparative study with ‘conventional’ lactam‐ and disulfide‐bridged hexapeptides

The increasing interest in click chemistry and its use to stabilize turn structures led us to compare the propensity for β‐turn stabilization of different analogs designed as mimics of the β‐turn structure found in tendamistat. The β‐turn conformation of linear β‐amino acid‐containing peptides and triazole‐cyclized analogs were compared to ‘conventional’ lactam‐ and disulfide‐bridged hexapeptide analogs. Their 3D structures and their propensity to fold in β‐turns in solution, and for those not structured in solution in the presence of α‐amylase, were analyzed by NMR spectroscopy and by restrained molecular dynamics with energy minimization. The linear tetrapeptide Ac‐Ser‐Trp‐Arg‐Tyr‐NH₂ and both the amide bond‐cyclized, c[Pro‐Ser‐Trp‐Arg‐Tyr‐D ‐Ala] and the disulfide‐bridged, Ac‐c[Cys‐Ser‐Trp‐Arg‐Tyr‐Cys]‐NH₂ hexapeptides adopt dominantly in solution a β‐turn conformation closely related to the one observed in tendamistat. On the contrary, the β‐amino acid‐containing peptides such as Ac‐(R)‐β³‐hSer‐(S)‐Trp‐(S)‐β³‐hArg‐(S)‐β³‐hTyr‐NH₂, and the triazole cyclic peptide, c[Lys‐Ser‐Trp‐Arg‐Tyr‐βtA]‐NH₂, both specifically designed to mimic this β‐turn, do not adopt stable structures in solution and do not show any characteristics of β‐turn conformation. However, these unstructured peptides specifically interact in the active site of α‐amylase, as shown by TrNOESY and saturation transfer difference NMR experiments performed in the presence of the enzyme, and are displaced by acarbose, a specific α‐amylase inhibitor. Thus, in contrast to amide‐cyclized or disulfide‐bridged hexapeptides, β‐amino acid‐containing peptides and click‐cyclized peptides may not be regarded as β‐turn stabilizers, but can be considered as potential β‐turn inducers. Copyright © 2011 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Helix stability of oligoglycine,oligoalanine, and oligo‐β‐alanine dodecamers reflected by hydrogen‐bond persistence

Helices are important structural/recognition elements in proteins and peptides. Stability and conformational differences between helices composed of α‐ and β‐amino acids as scaffolds for mimicry of helix recognition has become a theme in medicinal chemistry. Furthermore, helices formed by β‐amino acids are experimentally more stable than those formed by α‐amino acids. This is paradoxical because the larger sizes of the hydrogen‐bonding rings required by the extra methylene groups should lead to entropic destabilization. In this study, molecular dynamics simulations using the second‐generation force field, AMOEBA (Ponder, J.W., et al., Current status of the AMOEBA polarizable force field. J Phys Chem B, 2010. 114 (8): p. 2549–64.) explored the stability and hydrogen‐bonding patterns of capped oligo‐β‐alanine, oligoalanine, and oligoglycine dodecamers in water. The MD simulations showed that oligo‐β‐alanine has strong acceptor+2 hydrogen bonds, but surprisingly did not contain a large content of 3₁₂‐helical structures, possibly due to the sparse distribution of the 3₁₂‐helical structure and other structures with acceptor+2 hydrogen bonds. On the other hand, despite its backbone flexibility, the β‐alanine dodecamer had more stable and persistent <3.0 Å hydrogen bonds. Its structure was dominated more by multicentered hydrogen bonds than either oligoglycine or oligoalanine helices. The 3₁ (PII) helical structure, prevalent in oligoglycine and oligoalanine, does not appear to be stable in oligo‐β‐alanine indicating its competition with other structures (stacking structure as indicated by MD analyses). These differences are among the factors that shape helical structural preferences and the relative stabilities of these three oligopeptides. Proteins 2014; 82:3043–3061. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Differential effects of phe19 and phe20 on fibril formation by amyloidogenic peptide Aβ16–22 (Ac‐KLVFFAE‐NH2)

The sequence KLVFFAE (Aβ16–22) in Alzheimer's β‐amyloid is thought to be a core β‐structure that could act as a template for folding other parts of the polypeptide or molecules into fibrillar assemblies rich in β‐sheet. To elucidate the mechanism of the initial folding process, we undertook combined X‐ray fiber/powder diffraction and infrared (IR) spectroscopy to analyze lyophilized Aβ16–22 and solubilized/dried peptide containing nitrile probes at F19 and/or F20. Solubilized/dried wild‐type (WT) Aβ16–22 and the peptide containing cyanophenylalanine at F19 (19CN) or at F20 (20CN) gave fiber patterns consistent with slab‐like β‐crystallites that were cylindrically averaged around the axis parallel to the polypeptide chain direction. The WT and 19CN assemblies showed 30‐Å period arrays arising from the stacking of the slabs along the peptide chain direction, whereas the 20CN assemblies lacked any such stacking. The electron density projection along the peptide chain direction indicated similar side‐chain dispositions for WT and 20CN, but not for 19CN. These X‐ray results and modeling imply that in the assembly of WT Aβ16–22 the F19 side chain is localized within the intersheet space and is involved in hydrophobic contact with amino acids across the intersheet space, whereas the F20 side chain localized near the slab surface is less important for the intersheet interaction, but involved in slab stacking. IR observations for the same peptides in dilute solution showed a greater degree of hydrogen bonding for the nitrile groups in 20CN than in 19CN, supporting this interpretation. Proteins 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Evidence of π‐stacking interactions in the self‐assembly of hIAPP22‐29

The role aromatic amino acids play in the formation of amyloid is a subject of controversy. In an effort to clarify the contribution of aromaticity to the self‐assembly of human islet amyloid polypeptide (hIAPP)_22‐29, peptide analogs containing electron donating groups (EDGs) or electron withdrawing groups (EWGs) as substituents on the aromatic ring of Phe‐23 at the para position have been synthesized and characterized using turbidity measurements in conjunction with Raman and fluorescence spectroscopy. Results indicate the incorporation of EDGs on the aromatic ring of Phe‐23 virtually abolish the ability of hIAPP_22‐29 to form amyloid. Peptides containing EWGs were still capable of forming aggregates. These aggregates were found to be rich in β‐sheet secondary structure. Transmission electron microscopy images of the aggregates confirm the presence of amyloid fibrils. The observed difference in amyloidogenic propensity between peptides containing EDGs and those with EWGs appears not to be based on differences in peptide hydrophobicity. Fluorescence and Raman spectroscopic investigations reveal that the environment surrounding the aromatic ring becomes more hydrophobic and ordered upon aggregation. Furthermore, Raman measurements of peptide analogs containing EWGs, conclusively demonstrate a distinct downshift in the ? C?C? ring mode (ca. 1600 cm^?1) upon aggregation that has previously been shown to be indicative of π‐stacking. While previous work has demonstrated that π‐stacking is not an absolute requirement for fibrillization, our findings indicate that Phe‐23 also contributes to fibril formation through π‐stacking interactions and that it is not only the hydrophobic nature of this residue that is relevant in the self‐assembly of hIAPP_22‐29. © Proteins 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Aromatic‐interaction‐mediated inhibition of β‐amyloid assembly structures and cytotoxicity

Abnormal aggregation of β‐amyloid (Aβ) peptide plays an important role in the onset and progress of Alzheimer's disease (AD); hence, targeting Aβ aggregation is considered as an effective therapeutic strategy. Here, we studied the aromatic‐interaction‐mediated inhibitory effect of oligomeric polypeptides (K8Y8, K4Y8, K8W8) on Aβ42 fibrillization process. The polypeptides containing lysine as well as representative aromatic amino acids of tryptophan or tyrosine were found to greatly suppress the aggregation as evaluated by thioflavin T assay. Circular dichroism spectra showed that the β‐sheet formation of Aβ42 peptides decreased with the polypeptide additives. Molecular docking studies revealed that the oligomeric polypeptides could preferentially bind to Aβ42 through π–π stacking between aromatic amino acids and Phe19, together with hydrogen bonding. The cell viability assay confirmed that the toxicity of Aβ42 to SH‐SY5Y cells was markedly reduced in the presence of polypeptides. This study could be beneficial for developing peptide‐based inhibitory agents for amyloidoses. Copyright © 2017 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Effect of agitation on the peptide fibrillization: Alzheimer's amyloid‐β peptide 1‐42 but not amylin and insulin fibrils can grow under quiescent conditions

Many peptides and proteins can form fibrillar aggregates in vitro, but only a limited number of them are forming pathological amyloid structures in vivo. We studied the fibrillization of four peptides – Alzheimer's amyloid‐β (Aβ) 1‐40 and 1‐42, amylin and insulin. In all cases, intensive mechanical agitation of the solution initiated fast fibrillization. However, when the mixing was stopped during the fibril growth phase, the fibrillization of amylin and insulin was practically stopped, and the rate for Aβ₄₀ substantially decreased, whereas the fibrillization of Aβ₄₂ peptide continued to proceed with almost the same rate as in the agitated conditions. The reason for the different sensitivity of the in vitro fibrillization of these peptides towards agitation in the fibril growth phase remains elusive. Copyright © 2013 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Folding and membrane insertion of amyloid‐beta (25–35) peptide and its mutants: Implications for aggregation and neurotoxicity

The mechanisms of interfacial folding and membrane insertion of the Alzheimer's amyloid‐β fragment Aβ(25–35) and its less toxic mutant, N27A‐Aβ(25–35) and more toxic mutant, M35A‐Aβ(25–35), are investigated using replica–exchange molecular dynamics in an implicit water‐membrane environment. This study simulates the processes of interfacial folding and membrane insertion in a spontaneous fashion to identify their general mechanisms. Aβ(25–35) and N27A‐Aβ(25–35) peptides share similar mechanisms: the peptides are first located in the membrane hydrophilic region where their C‐terminal residues form helical structures. The peptides attempt to insert themselves into the membrane hydrophobic region using the C‐terminal or central hydrophobic residues. A small portion of peptides can successfully enter the membrane's hydrophobic core, led by their C‐terminal residues, through the formation of continuous helical structures. No detectable amount of M35A‐Aβ(25–35) peptides appeared to enter the membrane's hydrophobic core. The three studied peptides share a similar helical structure for their C‐terminal five residues, and these residues mainly buried within the membrane's hydrophobic region. In contrast, their N‐terminal properties are markedly different. With respect to the Aβ(25–35), the N27A‐Aβ(25–35) forms a more structured helix and is buried deeper within the membrane, which may result in a lower degree of aggregation and a lower neurotoxicity; in contrast, the less structured and more water‐exposed M35A‐Aβ(25–35) is prone to aggregation and has a higher neurotoxicity. Understanding the mechanisms of Aβ peptide interfacial folding and membrane insertion will provide new insights into the mechanisms of neurodegradation and may give structure‐based clues for rational drug design preventing amyloid associated diseases. Proteins 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Amyloidogenic sequences in native protein structures

Numerous short peptides have been shown to form β‐sheet amyloid aggregates in vitro. Proteins that contain such sequences are likely to be problematic for a cell, due to their potential to aggregate into toxic structures. We investigated the structures of 30 proteins containing 45 sequences known to form amyloid, to see how the proteins cope with the presence of these potentially toxic sequences, studying secondary structure, hydrogen‐bonding, solvent accessible surface area and hydrophobicity. We identified two mechanisms by which proteins avoid aggregation: Firstly, amyloidogenic sequences are often found within helices, despite their inherent preference to form β structure. Helices may offer a selective advantage, since in order to form amyloid the sequence will presumably have to first unfold and then refold into a β structure. Secondly, amyloidogenic sequences that are found in β structure are usually buried within the protein. Surface exposed amyloidogenic sequences are not tolerated in strands, presumably because they lead to protein aggregation via assembly of the amyloidogenic regions. The use of α‐helices, where amyloidogenic sequences are forced into helix, despite their intrinsic preference for β structure, is thus a widespread mechanism to avoid protein aggregation.     

β‐amyloid model core peptides: Effects of hydrophobes and disulfides

The mechanism by which a disordered peptide nucleates and forms amyloid is incompletely understood. A central domain of β‐amyloid (Aβ21–30) has been proposed to have intrinsic structural propensities that guide the limited formation of structure in the process of fibrillization. In order to test this hypothesis, we examine several internal fragments of Aβ, and variants of these either cyclized or with an N‐terminal Cys. While Aβ21–30 and variants were always monomeric and unstructured (circular dichroism (CD) and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMRS)), we found that the addition of flanking hydrophobic residues in Aβ16–34 led to formation of typical amyloid fibrils. NMR showed no long‐range nuclear overhauser effect (nOes) in Aβ21–30, Aβ16–34, or their variants, however. Serial ¹H‐¹⁵N‐heteronuclear single quantum coherence spectroscopy, ¹H‐¹H nuclear overhauser effect spectroscopy, and ¹H‐¹H total correlational spectroscopy spectra were used to follow aggregation of Aβ16–34 and Cys‐Aβ16–34 at a site‐specific level. The addition of an N‐terminal Cys residue (in Cys‐Aβ16–34) increased the rate of fibrillization which was attributable to disulfide bond formation. We propose a scheme comparing the aggregation pathways for Aβ16–34 and Cys‐Aβ16–34, according to which Cys‐Aβ16–34 dimerizes, which accelerates fibril formation. In this context, cysteine residues form a focal point that guides fibrillization, a role which, in native peptides, can be assumed by heterogeneous nucleators of aggregation.