Translational regulation by mRNA/protein interactions in eukaryotic cells: Ferritin and beyond

The expression of certain eukaryotic genes is – at least in part – controlled at the level of mRNA translation. The step of translational initiation represents the primary target for regulation. The regulation of the intracellular iron storage protein ferritin in response to iron levels provides a good example of translational control by a reversible RNA/protein interaction in the 5' untranslated region of an mRNA. We consider mechanisms by which mRNA/protein interactions may impede translation initiation and discuss recent data suggesting that the ferritin example may represent the ‘tip of the iceberg’ of a more general theme for translational control.     

Cap-dependent eukaryotic initiation factor-mRNA interactions probed by cross-linking

Cap-dependent ribosome recruitment to eukaryotic mRNAs during translation initiation is stimulated by the eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4F complex and eIF4B. eIF4F is a heterotrimeric complex composed of three subunits: eIF4E, a 7-methyl guanosine cap binding protein; eIF4A, a DEAD-box RNA helicase; and eIF4G. The interactions of eIF4E, eIF4A, and eIF4B with mRNA have previously been monitored by chemical- and UV-based cross-linking approaches aimed at characterizing the initial protein/mRNA interactions that lead to ribosome recruitment. These studies have led to a model whereby eIF4E interacts with the 7-methyl guanosine cap structure in an ATP-independent manner, followed by an ATP-dependent interaction of eIF4A and eIF4B. Herein, we apply a splint-ligation-mediated approach to generate 4-thiouridine-containing mRNA adjacent to a radiolabel group that we utilize to monitor cap-dependent cross-linking of proteins adjacent to, and downstream from, the cap structure. Using this approach, we demonstrate interactions between eIF4G, eIF4H, and eIF3 subunits with the mRNA during the cap recognition process.     

The genome-linked protein VPg of the Norwalk virus binds eIF3, suggesting its role in translation initiation complex recruitment

The positive-strand RNA genomes of caliciviruses are not capped, but are instead covalently linked at their 5' ends to a viral protein called VPg. The lack of a cap structure typical of eukaryotic mRNA and absence of an internal ribosomal entry site suggest that VPg may function in translation initiation on calicivirus RNA. This hypothesis was tested by analyzing binding of Norwalk virus VPg to translation initiation factors. The eIF3d subunit of eIF3 was identified as a binding partner of VPg by yeast two-hybrid analysis. VPg bound to purified mammalian eIF3 and to eIF3 in mammalian cell lysates. To test the effects of the VPg- eIF3 interaction on translation, VPg was added to cell-free translation reactions programmed with either capped reporter RNA, an RNA containing an EMCV internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) or an RNA with a cricket paralysis virus IRES. VPg inhibited translation of all reporter RNAs in a dose-dependent manner. Together, the data suggest that VPg may play a role in initiating translation on calicivirus RNA through unique protein-protein interactions with the translation machinery.     

Activation of cap-independent translation by variant eukaryotic initiation factor 4G in vivo

Protein synthesis is tightly controlled by assembly of an intricate ribonucleoprotein complex at the m⁷GTP-cap on eukaryotic mRNAs. Ensuing linear scanning of the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) is believed to transfer the preinitiation complex to the initiation codon. Eukaryotic mRNAs are characterized by significant 5′ UTR heterogeneity, raising the possibility of differential control of translation initiation rate at individual mRNAs. Curiously, many mRNAs with unconventional, highly structured 5′ UTRs encode proteins with central biological roles in growth control, metabolism, or stress response. The 5′ UTRs of such mRNAs may influence protein synthesis rate in multiple ways, but most significantly they have been implicated in mediating alternative means of translation initiation. Cap-independent initiation bypasses strict control over the formation of initiation intermediates at the m⁷GTP cap. However, the molecular mechanisms that favor alternative means of ribosome recruitment are not understood. Here we provide evidence that eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4G controls cap-independent translation initiation at the c-myc and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) 5′ UTRs in vivo. Cap-independent translation was investigated in tetracycline-inducible cell lines expressing either full-length eIF4G or a C-terminal fragment (Ct) lacking interaction with eIF4E and poly(A) binding protein. Expression of Ct, but not intact eIF4G, potently stimulated cap-independent initiation at the c-myc/VEGF 5′ UTRs. In vitro RNA-binding assays suggest that stimulation of cap-independent translation initiation by Ct is due to direct association with the c-myc/VEGF 5′ UTR, enabling 43S preinitiation complex recruitment. Our work demonstrates that variant translation initiation factors enable unconventional translation initiation at mRNA subsets with distinct structural features.     

General RNA‐binding proteins have a function in poly(A)‐binding protein‐dependent translation

The interaction between the poly(A)‐binding protein (PABP) and eukaryotic translational initiation factor 4G (eIF4G), which brings about circularization of the mRNA, stimulates translation. General RNA‐binding proteins affect translation, but their role in mRNA circularization has not been studied before. Here, we demonstrate that the major mRNA ribonucleoprotein YB‐1 has a pivotal function in the regulation of eIF4F activity by PABP. In cell extracts, the addition of YB‐1 exacerbated the inhibition of 80S ribosome initiation complex formation by PABP depletion. Rabbit reticulocyte lysate in which PABP weakly stimulates translation is rendered PABP‐dependent after the addition of YB‐1. In this system, eIF4E binding to the cap structure is inhibited by YB‐1 and stimulated by a nonspecific RNA. Significantly, adding PABP back to the depleted lysate stimulated eIF4E binding to the cap structure more potently if this binding had been downregulated by YB‐1. Conversely, adding nonspecific RNA abrogated PABP stimulation of eIF4E binding. These data strongly suggest that competition between YB‐1 and eIF4G for mRNA binding is required for efficient stimulation of eIF4F activity by PABP.     

In Vitro Molecular Characterization of RNA–Proteins Interactions During Initiation of Translation of a Wild-Type and a Mutant Coxsackievirus B3 RNAs

Translation initiation of Coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) RNA is directed by an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) within the 5′ untranslated region. Host cell factors involved in this process include some canonical translation factors and additional RNA-binding proteins. We have, previously, described that the Sabin3-like mutation (U475 → C) introduced in CVB3 genome led to a defective mutant with a serious reduction in translation efficiency. With the aim to identify proteins interacting with CVB3 wild-type and Sabin3-like IRESes and to study interactions between HeLa cell or BHK-21 protein extracts and CVB3 RNAs, UV-cross-linking assays were performed. We have observed a number of proteins that specifically interact with both RNAs. In particular, molecular weights of five of these proteins resemble to those of the eukaryotic translation initiation factors 4G, 3b, 4B, and PTB. According to cross-linking patterns obtained, we have demonstrated a better affinity of CVB3 RNA binding to BHK-21 proteins and a reduced interaction of the mutant RNA with almost cellular polypeptides compared to the wild-type IRES. On the basis of phylogeny of some initiation factors and on the knowledge of the initiation of translation process, we focused on the interaction of both IRESes with eIF3, p100 (eIF4G), and 40S ribosomal subunit by filter-binding assays. We have demonstrated a better affinity of binding to the wild-type CVB3 IRES. Thus, the reduction efficiency of the mutant RNA to bind to cellular proteins involved in the translation initiation could be the reason behind inefficient IRES function.     

RNA stem–loop enhanced expression of previously non-expressible genes

The key step in bacterial translation is formation of the pre-initiation complex. This requires initial contacts between mRNA, fMet-tRNA and the 30S subunit of the ribosome, steps that limit the initiation of translation. Here we report a method for improving translational initiation, which allows expression of several previously non-expressible genes. This method has potential applications in heterologous protein synthesis and high-throughput expression systems. We introduced a synthetic RNA stem–loop (stem length, 7 bp; ΔG₀ = –9.9 kcal/mol) in front of various gene sequences. In each case, the stem–loop was inserted 15 nt downstream from the start codon. Insertion of the stem–loop allowed in vitro expression of five previously non-expressible genes and enhanced the expression of all other genes investigated. Analysis of the RNA structure proved that the stem–loop was formed in vitro, and demonstrated that stabilization of the ribosome binding site is due to stem–loop introduction. By theoretical RNA structure analysis we showed that the inserted RNA stem–loop suppresses long-range interactions between the translation initiation domain and gene-specific mRNA sequences. Thus the inserted RNA stem–loop supports the formation of a separate translational initiation domain, which is more accessible to ribosome binding.     

Poly(A) binding protein, C-terminally truncated by the hepatitis A virus proteinase 3C, inhibits viral translation

Proteolytic cleavage of translation initiation factors is a means to interfere with mRNA circularization and to induce translation arrest during picornaviral replication or apoptosis. It was shown that the regulated cleavages of eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4G and poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) by viral proteinases correlated with early and late arrest of host cap-dependent and viral internal ribosome entry site (IRES)-dependent translation, respectively. Here we show that in contrast to coxsackievirus, eIF4G is not a substrate of proteinase 3C of hepatitis A virus (HAV 3C^pro). However, PABP is cleaved by HAV 3C^pro in vitro and in vivo, separating the N-terminal RNA-binding domain (NTD) of PABP from the C-terminal protein-interaction domain. In vitro, NTD has a dominant negative effect on HAV IRES-dependent translation and an enhanced binding affinity to the RNA structural element pY1 in the 5′ nontranslated region of the HAV RNA that is essential for viral genome replication. The results point to a regulatory role of PABP cleavage in RNA template switching of viral translation to RNA synthesis.     

Eukaryotic translation initiation: there are (at least) two sides to every story

The eukaryotic cap and poly(A) tail binding proteins, eIF4E and Pab1p, play important roles in the initiation of protein synthesis. The recent structures of the complex of eIF4E bound to the methylated guanosine (cap) found at the 5'end of messenger RNA (mRNA), the complex of eIF4E bound to peptide fragments of two related translation factors (eIF4G and 4E-BP1), and the complex of the N-terminal fragment of Pab1p bound to polyadenylate RNA have revealed that eIF4E and Pab1p contain at least two distinct functional surfaces. One surface is used for binding mRNA, and the other for binding proteins involved in translation initiation.     

eIF3: a versatile scaffold for translation initiation complexes

Translation initiation in eukaryotes depends on many eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) that stimulate both recruitment of the initiator tRNA, Met-tRNA(i)(Met), and mRNA to the 40S ribosomal subunit and subsequent scanning of the mRNA for the AUG start codon. The largest of these initiation factors, the eIF3 complex, organizes a web of interactions among several eIFs that assemble on the 40S subunit and participate in the different reactions involved in translation. Structural analysis suggests that eIF3 performs this scaffolding function by binding to the 40S subunit on its solvent-exposed surface rather than on its interface with the 60S subunit, where the decoding sites exist. This location of eIF3 seems ideally suited for its other proposed regulatory functions, including reinitiating translation on polycistronic mRNAs and acting as a receptor for protein kinases that control protein synthesis.