区域生态系统健康评价——研究方法与进展

生态系统健康评价是当前宏观生态学与生态系统管理研究的热点问题之一,区域尺度的生态系统健康评价则是生态系统健康评价研究的一个重要发展方向。在探讨生态系统健康时空尺度特征的基础上,明确界定了区域生态系统健康及其评价等相关概念,结合目前区域尺度生态系统健康评价的相关研究进展,从评价的区域类型、目标单元、模型方法、指标选取及其阈值、权重设定等方面探讨了区域生态系统健康评价的基本原理与方法,并展望了进一步研究的重点方向,即评价结果的多尺度综合与尺度转换、景观生态学理论与方法的应用、3S技术的综合应用等理论与技术问题。     

Evaluation for regional ecosystem health: methodology and research progress

The evaluation for ecosystem health is one of the hotspots in the fields of macro-ecology and ecosystem management. Conducting analysis at the regional scale is an important direction for evaluating ecosystem health. Changing the spatial scale from the local to the regional level leads to great differences in targets and methodologies for ecosystem health evaluation and creates a new direction for regional ecosystem health research. Compared with the ecosystem health at the local scale, which refers to a single ecosystem type, the regional ecosystem health focuses on the health conditions and spatial patterns of different ecosystem types. However, there has been little attention paid to this very research up to now. Based on the progress on ecosystem health studies at the regional scale, the study reported in this article aims to discuss the implications of the conception of regional ecosystem health and to put forward a methodology for evaluating the regional ecosystem health. The main results include: (1) there is a significant scaling effect on the ecosystem health analysis, and the regional level is the key scale used to focus on the correlation between spatially neighboring ecosystems in terms of ecosystem health; (2) regional ecosystem health can be defined through 4 aspects, i.e., vigor, organization, resilience, and ecosystem service functions; (3) the basic evaluation objects of the regional ecosystem health is spatial entity, which is the matrix of different ecosystem types; (4) indicator system method is the only approach to evaluate regional ecosystem health; (5) the absolute thresholds of the evaluation indicators for the regional ecosystem health do not exist; the aim of the evaluation is to discuss the temporal dynamic changes and spatial differences of health conditions rather than to ascertain whether a region is healthy or not in view of ecological sustainability; and (6) the integration of evaluation results at multispatial scales, the application of this methodology in the landscape ecology, and the utilization of geographic information systems (GIS), remote sensing (RS), and Global Positioning Systems (GPS) technologies are the main directions for further research.     

You are welcome here: A practical guide to diversity,equity, and inclusion for undergraduates embarking on an ecological research experience

As we build a more diverse, equitable, and inclusive culture in the ecological research community, we must work to support new ecologists by empowering them with the knowledge, tools, validation, and sense of belonging in ecology to succeed. Undergraduate research experiences (UREs) are critical for a student''s professional and interpersonal skill development and key for recruiting and retaining students from diverse groups to ecology. However, few resources exist that speak directly to an undergraduate researcher on the diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) dimensions of embarking on a first research experience. Here, we write primarily for undergraduate readers, though a broader audience of readers, especially URE mentors, will also find this useful. We explain many of the ways a URE benefits undergraduate researchers and describe how URE students from different positionalities can contribute to an inclusive research culture. We address three common sources of anxiety for URE students through a DEI lens: imposter syndrome, communicating with mentors, and safety in fieldwork. We discuss the benefits as well as the unique vulnerabilities and risks associated with fieldwork, including the potential for harassment and assault. Imposter syndrome and toxic field experiences are known to drive students, including students from underrepresented minority groups, out of STEM. Our goal is to encourage all students, including those from underrepresented groups, to apply for UREs, build awareness of their contributions to inclusion in ecology research, and provide strategies for overcoming known barriers.     

A novel murine CTP:phosphoethanolamine cytidylyltransferase splice variant is a post-translational repressor and an indicator that both cytidylyltransferase domains are required for activity

CTP:phosphoethanolamine cytidylyltransferase (Pcyt2) has an important regulatory function in biosynthesis of the membrane phospholipid phosphatidylethanolamine. We previously determined that the full-length Pcyt2α and its splice variant Pcyt2β are the main active isoforms of this enzyme. Here we report that mouse Pcyt2 could be spliced at Introns 7 and 8 to produce a unique third isoform, Pcyt2γ, in which the second cytidylyltransferase domain at the C-terminus becomes deleted. Pcyt2γ is ubiquitously expressed in embryonic and adult mouse tissues, and is the most abundant in the kidney, skeletal muscle and testis. Pcyt2γ splicing mechanism dominates over Pcyt2β exon-skipping mechanism in most examined tissues. Although Pcyt2γ maintains the N-terminal cytidylyltransferase domain as most cytidylyltransferases, the lack of the C-terminal cytidylyltransferase domain causes a complete loss of catalytic activity. However, Pcyt2γ interacts with the active isoform, Pcyt2α, and significantly reduces Pcyt2α homodimerization and activity. The inactive N-domain (H35Y, H35A) and C-domain (H244Y, H244A) mutants of Pcyt2α also reduce Pcyt2α homodimerization and activity. This study revealed the importance of both cytidylyltransferase ³⁵HYGH and ²⁴⁴HIGH motifs for the activity of murine Pcyt2α and established that the naturally occurring splice variant Pcyt2γ has a function to restrain the enzyme activity through the formation of unproductive enzyme complexes.