Down the rabbit hole: Is necroptosis truly an innate response to infection?

Pathogenic microbes have evolved countless sophisticated mechanisms to subvert host immune responses and cause disease. Understanding evasion strategies employed by pathogens has led to numerous discoveries on specific host cell processes that are critical for controlling infection. Programmed cell death (PCD) is a key host defence to microbial infection, as well as being critical for organ development and cellular homeostasis in multicellular organisms. Much of our current understanding of PCD as a host response to infection has stemmed from the discovery and study of viral inhibitors of apoptosis, and more recently viral inhibition of the newly characterised from of PCD termed necroptosis, the mechanisms of which are still under intense investigation. Many bacterial pathogens also encode inhibitors of PCD, yet these discoveries are relatively more recent and thus the biological significance of such mechanisms is still under debate. In this viewpoint article, we will argue the concept that necroptosis is merely a “back‐up” mechanism in the event that apoptosis is inhibited, or whether it is a true host innate response to infection that has evolved in response to a growing arsenal of microbial evasion strategies.     

Caspase-1 activation by Salmonella

Salmonella is an interesting example of how the selective pressure of host environments has led to the evolution of sophisticated bacterial virulence mechanisms. This microbe exploits the first-line of defence, the macrophage, as a crucial tool in the initiation of disease. After invasion of intestinal macrophages, a virulence protein secreted by Salmonella specifically induces apoptotic cell death by activating the cysteine protease caspase-1. The pro-apoptotic capability is necessary for successful pathogenesis. The study of mechanisms by which Salmonella induces programmed cell death offers new insights into how pathogens cause disease and into general mechanisms of activation of the innate immune system.     

How do oomycete effectors interfere with plant life?

Oomycete genomes have yielded a large number of predicted effector proteins that collectively interfere with plant life in order to create a favourable environment for pathogen infection. Oomycetes secrete effectors that can be active in the host's extracellular environment, for example inhibiting host defence enzymes, or inside host cells where they can interfere with plant processes, in particular suppression of defence. Two classes of effectors are known to be host-translocated: the RXLRs and Crinklers. Many effectors show defence-suppressive activity that is important for pathogen virulence. A striking example is AVR3a of Phytophthora infestans that targets an ubiquitin ligase, the stabilisation of which may prevent host cell death. The quest for other effector targets and mechanisms is in full swing.     

How does interferon inhibit tumour growth?

Interferon can inhibit tumour growth in experimental animals and in some patients with benign and malignant tumours. There is experimental evidence to suggest that several mechanisms may be involved: a direct effect on the tumor or an indirect effect via the host, or both. Thus, interferon may slow the rate of tumour cell multiplication and this may lead to cell death. Interferon may induce changes in the cell surface rendering tumour cells more sensitive to host defence mechanisms. Interferon may induce reversion in the phenotype of tumour cells. Interferon may stimulate specific and non-specific humoral and cellular host mechanisms. The relative importance of these different effects of interferon may vary depending on the host and the particular tumour.     

Host cell processes that influence the intracellular survival of Legionella pneumophila

Key to the pathogenesis of intracellular pathogens is their ability to manipulate host cell processes, permitting the establishment of an intracellular replicative niche. In turn, the host cell deploys defence mechanisms that limit intracellular infection. The bacterial pathogen Legionella pneumophila, the aetiological agent of Legionnaire's Disease, has evolved virulence mechanisms that allow it to replicate within protozoa, its natural host. Many of these tactics also enable L. pneumophila's survival and replication inside macrophages within a membrane-bound compartment known as the Legionella-containing vacuole. One of the virulence factors indispensable for L. pneumophila's intracellular survival is a type IV secretion system, which translocates a large repertoire of bacterial effectors into the host cell. These effectors modulate multiple host cell processes and in particular, redirect trafficking of the L. pneumophila phagosome and mediate its conversion into an ER-derived organelle competent for intracellular bacterial replication. In this review, we discuss how L. pneumophila manipulates host cells, as well as host cell processes that either facilitate or impede its intracellular survival.     

Mast-cell responses to pathogens

Mast cells have mainly been studied in the setting of allergic disease, but the importance of mast cells for host defence against several pathogens has now been well established. The location of mast cells, which are found closely associated with blood vessels, allows them to have a crucial sentinel role in host defence. The mast cell has a unique 'armamentarium' of receptor systems and mediators for responding to pathogen-associated signals. Studies of this intriguing immune-effector cell provide important insights into the complex mechanisms by which appropriate innate and acquired immune responses are initiated.     

Manipulation of the host cell death pathway by Shigella

Host cells deploy multiple defences against microbial infection. One prominent host defence mechanism, the death of infected cells, plays a pivotal role in clearing damaged cells, eliminating pathogens, removing replicative niches, exposing intracellular bacterial pathogens to extracellular immune surveillance and presenting bacteria‐derived antigens to the adaptive immune system. Although cell death can occur under either physiological or pathophysiological conditions, it acts as an innate defence mechanism against bacterial pathogens by limiting their persistent colonization. However, many bacterial pathogens, including Shigella, have evolved mechanisms that manipulate host cell death for their own benefit.     

Type IV secretion systems and their effectors in bacterial pathogenesis

Type IV secretion systems (T4SSs) are membrane-associated transporter complexes used by various bacteria to deliver substrate molecules to a wide range of target cells. T4SSs are involved in horizontal DNA transfer to other bacteria and eukaryotic cells, in DNA uptake from or release into the extracellular milieu, in toxin secretion and in the injection of virulence factors into eukaryotic host target cells by several mammalian pathogens. Rapid progress has been made towards defining the structures and functions of T4SSs, identifying the translocated effector molecules and elucidating the mechanisms by which the effectors subvert eukaryotic cellular processes during infection. These findings have had an important impact on our understanding of how these pathogens manipulate host cell functions to trigger bacterial uptake, facilitate intracellular growth and suppress defence mechanisms, thus facilitating bacterial colonization and disease development.     

Defence signalling pathways in cereals.

The combination of mutational and molecular studies has shed light on the role of reactive oxygen intermediates and programmed cell death in cereal disease resistance mechanisms. Rice Rac1 and barley Rar1 represent conserved disease resistance signalling genes, which may have related functions in animals. The analysis of non-pathogenic Magnaporthe grisea mutants may provide novel tools to study host defence pathways.     

Paneth cells, antimicrobial peptides and maintenance of intestinal homeostasis

Building and maintaining a homeostatic relationship between a host and its colonizing microbiota entails ongoing complex interactions between the host and the microorganisms. The mucosal immune system, including epithelial cells, plays an essential part in negotiating this equilibrium. Paneth cells (specialized cells in the epithelium of the small intestine) are an important source of antimicrobial peptides in the intestine. These cells have become the focus of investigations that explore the mechanisms of host-microorganism homeostasis in the small intestine and its collapse in the processes of infection and chronic inflammation. In this Review, we provide an overview of the intestinal microbiota and describe the cell biology of Paneth cells, emphasizing the composition of their secretions and the roles of these cells in intestinal host defence and homeostasis. We also highlight the implications of Paneth cell dysfunction in susceptibility to chronic inflammatory bowel disease.     

The ins and outs of host‐microsporidia interactions during invasion,proliferation and exit

Microsporidia are a large group of fungal‐related obligate intracellular parasites. They are responsible for infections in humans as well as in agriculturally and environmentally important animals. Although microsporidia are abundant in nature, many of the molecular mechanisms employed during infection have remained enigmatic. In this review, we highlight recent work showing how microsporidia invade, proliferate and exit from host cells. During invasion, microsporidia use spore wall and polar tube proteins to interact with host receptors and adhere to the host cell surface. In turn, the host has multiple defence mechanisms to prevent and eliminate these infections. Microsporidia encode numerous transporters and steal host nutrients to facilitate proliferation within host cells. They also encode many secreted proteins which may modulate host metabolism and inhibit host cell defence mechanisms. Spores exit the host in a non‐lytic manner that is dependent on host actin and endocytic recycling proteins. Together, this work provides a fuller picture of the mechanisms that these fascinating organisms use to infect their hosts.     

Lymphocyte subsets as prognostic markers for cancer patients receiving immunomodulative therapy

Immunogenic features of some malignancies have aroused interest in immunotherapy of cancer. Immunotherapy seems most effective in patients with a small tumour burden, and the focus of immunotherapy trials has, thus, lately been on adjuvant treatment. To enable further development of immunotherapy we need to know more about the mechanisms involved in host defence, especially when the system is influenced by extrinsic factors, that is, immunomodulative agents. T lymphocytes play an important role in the host defence against tumour cells trying to escape from immune surveillance. The mechanisms that regulate the host defence systems are complex, and the influence of extrinsic factors such as immunotherapeutic agents is poorly understood. Most data on lymphocyte subsets in malignant disease originate from melanoma or renal cell carcinoma (RCC) studies, although there are scattered data on lymphocyte subsets also in other malignancies. There are several studies implying that the relative amount of CD4+, CD8+, and natural killer (NK) cells may be important and that, by reducing the tumour burden or by using different therapeutic agents, we can stimulate the host defence. However, only some of these studies imply that these changes can have an impact on clinical outcome and prognosis. The findings of the studies reviewed in this paper are mostly encouraging, but whether the lymphocyte subsets have any value as prognostic markers in patients with malignancies receiving immunotherapy is still unclear. Large randomized immunotherapy trials including an observation arm give an ideal opportunity to recognize those immunological changes that are due to therapy, related to the natural host defence, or whether they have any prognostic value.     

Entering and breaking: virulence effector proteins of oomycete plant pathogens

Oomycete pathogens of plants and animals are related to marine algae and have evolved mechanisms to avoid or suppress host defences independently of other groups of pathogens, such as bacteria and fungi. They cause many destructive diseases affecting crops, forests and aquaculture. The development of genomic resources has led to a dramatic increase in our knowledge of the effectors used by these pathogens to suppress host defences. In particular, a huge, rapidly diverging superfamily of effectors with 100–600 members per genome has been identified. Proteins in this family use the N-terminal motifs RxLR and dEER to cross the host plasma cell membrane autonomously. Once inside the host cell, the proteins suppress host defence signalling. The importance of this effector family is underlined by the fact that plants have evolved intracellular defence receptors to detect the effectors and trigger a rapid counter-attack. The mechanisms by which the effector enter host cells, and by which they suppress host defences, remain to be elucidated.     

Toxoplasma gondii Development of Its Replicative Niche: in Its Host Cell and Beyond

Intracellular pathogens can replicate efficiently only after they manipulate and modify their host cells to create an environment conducive to replication. While diverse cellular pathways are targeted by different pathogens, metabolism, membrane and cytoskeletal architecture formation, and cell death are the three primary cellular processes that are modified by infections. Toxoplasma gondii is an obligate intracellular protozoan that infects ∼30% of the world''s population and causes severe and life-threatening disease in developing fetuses, in immune-comprised patients, and in certain otherwise healthy individuals who are primarily found in South America. The high prevalence of Toxoplasma in humans is in large part a result of its ability to modulate these three host cell processes. Here, we highlight recent work defining the mechanisms by which Toxoplasma interacts with these processes. In addition, we hypothesize why some processes are modified not only in the infected host cell but also in neighboring uninfected cells.     

First encounters--deployment of defence-related natural products by plants

Plant-derived natural products have important functions in ecological interactions. In some cases these compounds are deployed to sites of pathogen challenge by vesicle-mediated trafficking. Polar vesicle trafficking of natural products, proteins and other, as yet uncharacterized, cargo is emerging as a common theme in investigations of diverse disease resistance mechanisms in plants. Root-derived natural products can have marked effects on interactions between plants and soilborne organisms, for example by serving as signals for initiation of symbioses with rhizobia and mycorrhizal fungi. They may also contribute to competitiveness of invasive plant species by inhibiting the growth of neighbouring plants (allelopathy). Very little is known about the mechanisms of release of natural products from aerial plant parts or from roots, although there are likely to be commonalities in these processes. There is increasing evidence to indicate that pathogens and symbionts can manipulate plant endomembrane systems to suppress host defence responses and facilitate accommodation within plant cells. The relationship between secretory processes and plant interactions forms the focus of this review, which brings together different aspects of the deployment of defence-related natural products by plants.     

RIP kinases: key decision makers in cell death and innate immunity

Innate immunity represents the first line of defence against invading pathogens. It consists of an initial inflammatory response that recruits white blood cells to the site of infection in an effort to destroy and eliminate the pathogen. Some pathogens replicate within host cells, and cell death by apoptosis is an important effector mechanism to remove the replication niche for such microbes. However, some microbes have evolved evasive strategies to block apoptosis, and in these cases host cells may employ further countermeasures, including an inflammatory form of cell death know as necroptosis. This review aims to highlight the importance of the RIP kinase family in controlling these various defence strategies. RIP1 is initially discussed as a key component of death receptor signalling and in the context of dictating whether a cell triggers a pathway of pro-inflammatory gene expression or cell death by apoptosis. The molecular and functional interplay of RIP1 and RIP3 is described, especially with respect to mediating necroptosis and as key mediators of inflammation. The function of RIP2, with particular emphasis on its role in NOD signalling, is also explored. Special attention is given to emphasizing the physiological and pathophysiological contexts for these various functions of RIP kinases.     

Intracellular parasitism: cell biological adaptations of parasitic protozoa to a life inside cells

Several protozoan parasites evade the host's immune defence because most of their development takes place inside specific host cells. Only a few of these protozoa live within the host cell cytosol. Most parasites are sequestered within membrane-bound compartments, collectively called ‘vacuoles’. Recent advances in the cell biology of intracellular parasites have revealed fundamental differences in the strategies whereby such organisms gain entry into their respective host cells. These differences have important implications for host-parasite interaction and for nutrient acquisition by the parasite. Leishmania spp. take advantage of the phagocytic properties of their host cells and presumably contribute little to the uptake process. In contrast, apicomplexan parasites have developed highly specialised organelles, called micronemes and rhoptries, to actively invade a variety of nucleated cells and, in the case of Plasmodium falciparum, human erythrocytes. Following invasion, parasites use a multitude of strategies to protect themselves from the defence mechanisms of the parasitized cells. In addition, they induce novel pathways within the infected cell that allow a most efficient nutrient acquisition both from the host cell cytoplasm and from the extracellular environment. Parasite-induced changes of host cells are most apparent in erythrocytes infected with Plasmodium spp. Mammalian erythrocytes are deficient in de novo protein and lipid biosynthesis and, consequently, pathways which allow the transport of macromolecules and small solutes are established by metabolic activities of the parasite. Research into the cell biology of intracellular parasitism has identified fascinating phenomena some of which we are beginning to understand at a molecular level. They are fascinating because they allow insights into a very intimate interaction between two eukaryotic cells of entirely different phylogenetic origins.     

TNF and TNFR biology in health and disease.

Many insights have been gained into cytokine-regulated control of inflammatory processes and host defence in recent years. Evidence has also gradually accumulated that cytokine cascades play a central role in events regulating cell death and differentiation. Further developments include an understanding that the biological effects of the tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha or TNFSF) cytokine may be regulated by soluble TNF receptor binding and that modulation of receptor levels may permit physiological inhibition of TNF action. There has been a gradual realisation of the value of TNF/TNFR ratios as predictors of disease outcome, and the discovery of functional regulatory polymorphisms of the TNF gene and mutations of TNFRSF1A (TNFR1 receptor) have led to conceptual breakthroughs in our understanding of the genetic control of inflammation. However the exact mechanisms by which TNFRSF1A mutations give rise to disease susceptibility are not yet well understood. Over the past 10 years these concepts have been used as the basis for successful anti-TNF therapy of autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and Crohn's disease.     

Manipulation of host signalling pathways by anthrax toxins

Infectious microbes face an unwelcoming environment in their mammalian hosts, which have evolved elaborate multicelluar systems for recognition and elimination of invading pathogens. A common strategy used by pathogenic bacteria to establish infection is to secrete protein factors that block intracellular signalling pathways essential for host defence. Some of these proteins also act as toxins, directly causing pathology associated with disease. Bacillus anthracis, the bacterium that causes anthrax, secretes two plasmid-encoded enzymes, LF (lethal factor) and EF (oedema factor), that are delivered into host cells by a third bacterial protein, PA (protective antigen). The two toxins act on a variety of cell types, disabling the immune system and inevitably killing the host. LF is an extraordinarily selective metalloproteinase that site-specifically cleaves MKKs (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases). Cleavage of MKKs by LF prevents them from activating their downstream MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) substrates by disrupting a critical docking interaction. Blockade of MAPK signalling functionally impairs cells of both the innate and adaptive immune systems and induces cell death in macrophages. EF is an adenylate cyclase that is activated by calmodulin through a non-canonical mechanism. EF causes sustained and potent activation of host cAMP-dependent signalling pathways, which disables phagocytes. Here I review recent progress in elucidating the mechanisms by which LF and EF influence host signalling and thereby contribute to disease.