A comparison of cDNA, oligonucleotide, and Affymetrix GeneChip gene expression microarray platforms.

We have conducted a study to compare the variability in measured gene expression levels associated with three types of microarray platforms. Total RNA samples were obtained from liver tissue of four male mice, two each from inbred strains A/J and C57BL/6J. The same four samples were assayed on Affymetrix Mouse Genome Expression Set 430 GeneChips (MOE430A and MOE430B), spotted cDNA microarrays, and spotted oligonucleotide microarrays using eight arrays of each type. Variances associated with measurement error were observed to be comparable across all microarray platforms. The MOE430A GeneChips and cDNA arrays had higher precision across technical replicates than the MOE430B GeneChips and oligonucleotide arrays. The Affymetrix platform showed the greatest range in the magnitude of expression levels followed by the oligonucleotide arrays. We observed good concordance in both estimated expression level and statistical significance of common genes between the Affymetrix MOE430A GeneChip and the oligonucleotide arrays. Despite their apparently high precision, cDNA arrays showed poor concordance with other platforms.     

Independence and reproducibility across microarray platforms

Microarrays have been widely used for the analysis of gene expression, but the issue of reproducibility across platforms has yet to be fully resolved. To address this apparent problem, we compared gene expression between two microarray platforms: the short oligonucleotide Affymetrix Mouse Genome 430 2.0 GeneChip and a spotted cDNA array using a mouse model of angiotensin II-induced hypertension. RNA extracted from treated mice was analyzed using Affymetrix and cDNA platforms and then by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) for validation of specific genes. For the 11,710 genes present on both arrays, we assessed the relative impact of experimental treatment and platform on measured expression and found that biological treatment had a far greater impact on measured expression than did platform for more than 90% of genes, a result validated by qRT-PCR. In the small number of cases in which platforms yielded discrepant results, qRT-PCR generally did not confirm either set of data, suggesting that sequence-specific effects may make expression predictions difficult to make using any technique.     

Current issues for DNA microarrays: platform comparison, double linear amplification, and universal RNA reference

DNA microarray technology has been widely used to simultaneously determine the expression levels of thousands of genes. A variety of approaches have been used, both in the implementation of this technology and in the analysis of the large amount of expression data. However, several practical issues still have not been resolved in a satisfactory manner, and among the most critical is the lack of agreement in the results obtained in different array platforms. In this study, we present a comparison of several microarray platforms [Affymetrix oligonucleotide arrays, custom complementary DNA (cDNA) arrays, and custom oligo arrays printed with oligonucleotides from three different sources] as well as analysis of various methods used for microarray target preparation and the reference design. The results indicate that the pairwise correlations of expression levels between platforms are relative low overall but that the log ratios of the highly expressed genes are strongly correlated, especially between Affymetrix and cDNA arrays. The microarray measurements were compared with quantitative real-time-polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR) results for 23 genes, and the varying degrees of agreement for each platform were characterized. We have also developed and tested a double amplification method which allows the use of smaller amounts of starting material. The added round of amplification produced reproducible results as compared to the arrays hybridized with single round amplified targets. Finally, the reliability of using a universal RNA reference for two-channel microarrays was tested and the results suggest that comparisons of multiple experimental conditions using the same control can be accurate.     

Expression profiling by oligonucleotide microarrays spotted on coated polymer slides

We have developed a ready-to-spot polymer microarray slide, which is coated with a uniform layer of reactive electrophilic groups using anthraquinone-mediated photo-coupling chemistry. The slide coating reduces the hydrophobicity of the native polymer significantly, thereby enabling robust and efficient one-step coupling of spotted 5' amino-linked oligonucleotides onto the polymer slide. The utility of the coated polymer slide in gene expression profiling was assessed by fabrication of spotted oligonucleotide microarrays using a collection of 5' amino-linked 70-mer oligonucleotide probes representing 96 yeast genes from Operon. Two-colour hybridizations with labelled cDNA target pools derived from standard grown and heat-shocked wild type yeast cells could reproducibly measure heat shock induced expression of seven different heat shock protein (HSP) genes. Moreover, the observed fold changes were comparable to those reported previously using spotted cDNA arrays and high-density 25-mer oligonucleotide arrays from Affymetrix. The low hybridization signals obtained from the DeltaSSA4 mutant cDNA target, together with the high signal detected in two-colour hybridizations with heat-shocked wild type yeast relative to the DeltaSSA4 mutant strain implies that unspecific binding of cDNA target to the SSA4-specific 70-mer oligonucleotide probes is negligible. Combined, our results indicate that the coated polymer microarray slide represents a robust and cost-effective array platform for pre-spotted oligonucleotide arrays.     

Comparison of gene expression measurements from cDNA and 60-mer oligonucleotide microarrays

As the data generated by microarray technology continue to amass, it is necessary to compare and combine gene expression data from different platforms. To evaluate the performance of cDNA and long oligonucleotide (60-mer) arrays, we generated gene expression profiles for two cancer cell lines and compared the data between the two platforms. All 6182 unique genes represented on both platforms were included in the analysis. A limited correlation (r = 0.4708) was obtained and the difference in measurement of low-expression genes was considered to contribute to the limited correlation. Further restriction of the data set to differentially expressed genes detected in cDNA microarrays (1205 genes) and oligonucleotide arrays (1325 genes) showed modest correlations of 0.7076 and 0.6441 between the two platforms. Quantitative real-time PCR measurements of a set of 10 genes showed better correlation with oligonucleotide arrays. Our results demonstrate that there is substantial variation in the data generated from cDNA and 60-mer oligonucleotide arrays. Although general agreement was observed in measurements of differentially expressed genes, we suggest that data from different platforms could not be directly amassed.     

An integrated cross-platform prognosis study on neuroblastoma patients

There have been several reports about the potential for predicting prognosis of neuroblastoma patients using microarray gene expression profiling of the tumors. However these studies have revealed an apparent diversity in the identity of the genes in their predictive signatures. To test the contribution of the platform to this discrepancy we applied the z-scoring method to minimize the impact of platform and combine gene expression profiles of neuroblastoma (NB) tumors from two different platforms, cDNA and Affymetrix. A total of 12442 genes were common to both cDNA and Affymetrix arrays in our data set. Two-way ANOVA analysis was applied to the combined data set for assessing the relative effect of prognosis and platform on gene expression. We found that 26.6% (3307) of the genes had significant impact on survival. There was no significant impact of microarray platform on expression after application of z-scoring standardization procedure. Artificial neural network (ANN) analysis of the combined data set in a leave-one-out prediction strategy correctly predicted the outcome for 90% of the samples. Hierarchical clustering analysis using the top-ranked 160 genes showed the great separation of two clusters, and the majority of matched samples from the different platforms were clustered next to each other. The ANN classifier trained with our combined cross-platform data for these 160 genes could predict the prognosis of 102 independent test samples with 71% accuracy. Furthermore it correctly predicted the outcome for 85/102 (83%) NB patients through the leave-one-out cross-validation approach. Our study showed that gene expression studies performed in different platforms could be integrated for prognosis analysis after removing variation resulting from different platforms.     

Are data from different gene expression microarray platforms comparable?

Many commercial and custom-made microarray formats are routinely used for large-scale gene expression surveys. Here, we sought to determine the level of concordance between microarray platforms by analyzing breast cancer cell lines with in situ synthesized oligonucleotide arrays (Affymetrix HG-U95v2), commercial cDNA microarrays (Agilent Human 1 cDNA), and custom-made cDNA microarrays from a sequence-validated 13K cDNA library. Gene expression data from the commercial platforms showed good correlations across the experiments (r = 0.78-0.86), whereas the correlations between the custom-made and either of the two commercial platforms were lower (r = 0.62-0.76). Discrepant findings were due to clone errors on the custom-made microarrays, old annotations, or unknown causes. Even within platform, there can be several ways to analyze data that may influence the correlation between platforms. Our results indicate that combining data from different microarray platforms is not straightforward. Variability of the data represents a challenge for developing future diagnostic applications of microarrays.     

Gene expression profiling: methodological challenges,results, and prospects for addiction research

This review describes the current methods used to profile gene expression. These methods include microarrays, spotted arrays, serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE), and massive parallel signature sequencing (MPSS). Methodological and statistical problems in interpreting microarray and spotted array experiments are also discussed. Methods and formats such as minimum information about microarray experiments (MIAME) needed to share gene expression data are described. The last part of the review provides an overview of the application of gene-expression profiling technology to substance abuse research and discusses future directions.     

Differences in gene expression between B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia and normal B cells: a meta-analysis of three microarray studies

MOTIVATION: A major focus of current cancer research is to identify genes that can be used as markers for prognosis and diagnosis, and as targets for therapy. Microarray technology has been applied extensively for this purpose, even though it has been reported that the agreement between microarray platforms is poor. A critical question is: how can we best combine the measurements of matched genes across microarray platforms to develop diagnostic and prognostic tools related to the underlying biology? RESULTS: We introduce a statistical approach within a Bayesian framework to combine the microarray data on matched genes from three investigations of gene expression profiling of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and normal B cells (NBC) using three different microarray platforms, oligonucleotide arrays, cDNA arrays printed on glass slides and cDNA arrays printed on nylon membranes. Using this approach, we identified a number of genes that were consistently differentially expressed between CLL and NBC samples.     

A sequence-oriented comparison of gene expression measurements across different hybridization-based technologies

Over the last decade, gene expression microarrays have had a profound impact on biomedical research. The diversity of platforms and analytical methods available to researchers have made the comparison of data from multiple platforms challenging. In this study, we describe a framework for comparisons across platforms and laboratories. We have attempted to include nearly all the available commercial and 'in-house' platforms. Using probe sequences matched at the exon level improved consistency of measurements across the different microarray platforms compared to annotation-based matches. Generally, consistency was good for highly expressed genes, and variable for genes with lower expression values as confirmed by quantitative real-time (QRT)-PCR. Concordance of measurements was higher between laboratories on the same platform than across platforms. We demonstrate that, after stringent preprocessing, commercial arrays were more consistent than in-house arrays, and by most measures, one-dye platforms were more consistent than two-dye platforms.     

Anchoring of unmodified oligonucleotides on a chitosan-based array: applications to genotyping and gene expression

Oligonucleotide arrays are one of the most used technologies in genotyping and gene expression experiments. Here, a previously developed chitosan-based platform is characterized in its binding of unmodified oligonucleotides, increasing the cost effectiveness of the microarray production process. The unmodified oligonucleotides on the activated chitosan surface showed the same or better performances than amino-modified probes. Moreover, we show applications in genotyping (a ligation detection reaction experiment on cyanobacteria) and in gene expression (on peach RNA samples). The platform was demonstrated to be reliable, robust, and reproducible for immobilizing unmodified oligonucleotides in high quality oligonucleotide array fabrication.     

Functional analysis and comparative genomics of expressed sequence tags from the lycophyte Selaginella moellendorffii

Background

DNA microarrays are widely used in gene expression analyses. To increase throughput and minimize costs without reducing gene expression data obtained, we investigated whether four mRNA samples can be analyzed simultaneously by applying four different fluorescent dyes.

Results

Following tests for cross-talk of fluorescence signals, Alexa 488, Alexa 594, Cyanine 3 and Cyanine 5 were selected for hybridizations. For self-hybridizations, a single RNA sample was labelled with all dyes and hybridized on commercial cDNA arrays or on in-house spotted oligonucleotide arrays. Correlation coefficients for all combinations of dyes were above 0.9 on the cDNA array. On the oligonucleotide array they were above 0.8, except combinations with Alexa 488, which were approximately 0.5. Standard deviation of expression differences for replicate spots were similar on the cDNA array for all dye combinations, but on the oligonucleotide array combinations with Alexa 488 showed a higher variation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the four dyes can be used simultaneously for gene expression experiments on the tested cDNA array, but only three dyes can be used on the tested oligonucleotide array. This was confirmed by hybridizations of control with test samples, as all combinations returned similar numbers of differentially expressed genes with comparable effects on gene expression.