Iontophoretic application of bitter taste stimuli in hamsters

Recent electrophysiological studies on the iontophoretic applicationof taste stimuli by weak electric currents using rodents andfrogs have produced stimuli which appear to mimic the actionof salty, sour and sweet solutions. However, there has beenno report of an ionic stimulus which might serve as a bitteriontophoretic probe. Many common bitter stimuli are either uncharged(e.g. quinine, urea) or have mixed quality sensations (e.g.the bitter salts KCl, MgCl₂) and therefore are unsuitable. Thisreport investigates the use of four organic anions, all of whichare bitter to humans, which may serve as potential bitter stimulifor iontophoretic application to the tongue of the hamster whilerecording electrophysiologically from its chorda tympani nerve.These anions are m-nitrobenzene sulfonate (NBSA), picrate, cholateand m-nitrobenzoate (NBA). The electrophysiological responsesto cathodal polarization via these four anions plus saccharin,an effective cathodal stimulus in the hamster, form the sameefficacy series as chemical (i.e. normal sapid) presentationsof sodium salts of these anions, i.e. saccharin > NBSA >picrate > NBA > cholate. Behavioral evidence suggeststhat NBSA is sweet to hamsters while the latter three anions,picrate, NBA and cholate, are bitter. Electrophyiological observations,based on magnitude of response, appear to support these behavioralfindings. It was concluded that picrate, NBA and cholate mayserve as useful bitter stimulus probes for ionto-phoretic applicationin the hamster.     

Individual differences in sensitivity to bitter-tasting substances

Perception of several bitter-tasting compounds was tested in52 subjects. Stable individual differences in the perceivedintensity of the bitterness of suprathreshold concentrationsof quinine sulfate (QSO₄) and urea were found. Whereas 18 subjectsjudged selected concentrations of these compounds to be equallybitter, 17 found QSO₄ to be more bitter than urea, and 17 foundurea to be more bitter than QSO₄. These reliable individualdifferences were significantly related to threshold sensitivityto QSO₄; that is, individuals who perceived QSO₄ to be moreintense than urea at suprathreshold concentrations also hadlower QSO₄ thresholds than did those who perceived urea to bemore intense than QSO₄. There appeared to be no relationshipbetween the relative perceived intensities of these compoundsand rating of the bitterness of PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil).However, QSO₄-sensitive individuals tended to find the bitternessof suprathreshold caffeine and sucrose octaacetate to be greaterthan that of suprathreshold magnesium sulfate, whereas the reversewas true for urea-sensitive individuals. This pattern parallelsthe pattern of cross-adaptation among these compounds reportedby other investigators. These results are consistent with theexistence of multiple bitter transduction sequences and suggestthat individual differences in response to various bitter compoundsmay reflect differences in teh relative availability of specifictransduction sequences.     

Suppression of Bitterness by Sodium: Variation Among Bitter Taste Stimuli

Taste interactions between salts (NaCl, LiCl, KCl, L-arginine:L-asparticacid, Na-acetate and Na-gluconate) and bittertasting compounds(urea, quinine HCI, magnesium sulphate, KCI, amiloride HCI andcaffeine) were investigated. In each study binary combinationsof three or four concentrations of one bitter compound withfour concentrations (0, 0.1, 0.3 and 0.5 M) of one salt wererated for bitterness and saltiness using the method of magnitudeestimation. In most cases, perceived bitterness was suppressedby salts, although the degree of suppression varied. In general,bitterness suppression was not accompanied by an equivalentreciprocal suppression of saltiness. Only MgSO₄ and amiloridehad suppressing effects on the saltiness of NaCl at the intermediateconcentrations and no bitter compound affected the saltinessat the high concentrations of NaCl. Since salt suppressed thebitterness of urea effectively, a detailed analysis of suppressionof the bitterness of urea by different salts was conducted.Those studies indicated that the key component in this effectwas the sodium or lithium ion for two reasons: first, all threesodium salts and the lithium salt had a suppressive effect onbitterness, whereas KCl did not; secondly, the effect of a salton suppression of the bitterness of urea was independent ofits perceived saltiness; that is, NaCl, Na-acetate (which isperceived as less salty than NaCl), and Na-gluconate (whichis perceived as less salty than Na-acetate) reduced bitternesscomparably. These results suggest that there is a major peripheralcomponent to the suppression of the bitterness of urea, andperhaps other bitter tasting compounds, by sodium. Chem. Senses20: 609–623, 1995.     

Reduction of saltiness and bitterness after a chlorhexidine rinse

Chronic rinsing with chlorhexidine, an oral-antiseptic, has been shown to decrease the saltiness of NaCl and the bitterness of quinine. The effect of acute chlorhexidine on taste has not been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of acute chlorhexidine rinses on taste intensity and quality of 11 stimuli representing sweet, salt, sour, bitter and savory. All stimuli were first matched for overall intensity so the effects of chlorhexidine would be directly comparable across compounds. As a control treatment, the bitter taste of chlorhexidine digluconate (0.12%) was matched in intensity to quinine HCl, which was found to cross-adapt the bitterness of chlorhexidine. Subjects participated in four experimental conditions: a pre-test, a quinine treatment, a chlorhexidine treatment, and a post-test condition, while rating total taste intensity and taste qualities in separate test sessions. Relative to the quinine treatment, chlorhexidine was found to decrease the salty taste of NaCl, KCl and NH4Cl, and not to significantly affect the tastes of sucrose, monosodium glutamate (MSG), citric acid, HCl and the taste of water. The bitter taste of urea, sucrose octa-acetate and quinine were suppressed after chlorhexidine rinses relative to water rinses, but were only marginally suppressed relative to quinine rinses. Potential mechanisms are discussed.     

Riboflavin-binding protein is a novel bitter inhibitor

Riboflavin-binding protein (RBP) from chicken egg, which was recently reported to be a selective sweet inhibitor for protein sweeteners, was also found to be a bitter inhibitor. RBP elicited broadly tuned inhibition of various bitter substances including quinine-HCl, naringin, theobromine, caffeine, glycyl-L-phenylalanine (Gly-Phe), and denatonium benzoate, whereas several other proteins, such as ovalbumin (OVA) and beta-lactoglobulin, were ineffective in reducing bitterness of these same compounds. Both the bitter tastes of quinine and caffeine were reduced following an oral prerinse with RBP. It was found that RBP binds to quinine but not to caffeine, theobromine, naringin, and Gly-Phe. However, the binding of RBP to quinine was probably not responsible for the bitter inhibition because OVA bound to quinine as well as RBP. Based on these results, it is suggested that the bitter inhibitory effect of RBP is the consequence of its ability to interact with taste receptors rather than because it interacts with the bitter tastants themselves. RBP may have practical uses in reducing bitterness of foods and pharmaceuticals. It may also prove a useful tool in studies of mechanisms of bitter taste.     

Regional specificity of chlorhexidine effects on taste perception

Chlorhexidine (CHX) gluconate, a bitter bis-biguanide antiseptic, reduces the intensity of the salty taste of NaCl and bitter taste of quinine in humans. This study addresses regional specificity of CHX's effects on taste. Perceptual intensity and quality were measured for separate taste bud containing oral loci innervated either by afferent fibers of cranial nerve (CN) VII or CN IX. Measurements were obtained following three 1-min oral rinses with either 1.34 mM CHX or water, the control rinse. CHX rinse reduced the intensity of NaCl more at the tongue tip and palate than at posterior oral sites. Thus, fungiform and palatal salt-taste receptors may differ from salt-taste receptors of the foliate and circumvallate taste papillae. The intensity of quinine.HCl was reduced equally by CHX at all sites tested but was frequently tasteless on the less sensitive anterior sites, suggesting quinine receptor diversity. In rodents, a portion of NaCl-taste receptors in the receptive field of CN VII is sensitive to the epithelial Na+ channel blocker amiloride and a portion is amiloride insensitive; all CN IX receptors are amiloride insensitive. The current results are the first to suggest that there may also be distinct, regionally specific populations of NaCl-taste receptors in humans.     

Cross-adaptation and bitterness inhibition of L-tryptophan, L-phenylalanine and urea: further support for shared peripheral physiology

A previous study investigating individuals' bitterness sensitivities found a close association among three compounds: L-tryptophan (L-trp), L-phenylalanine (L-phe) and urea (Delwiche et al., 2001, Percept. Psychophys. 63, 761-776). In the present experiment, psychophysical cross-adaptation and bitterness inhibition experiments were performed on these three compounds to determine whether the bitterness could be differentially affected by either technique. If the two experimental approaches failed to differentiate L-trp, L-phe and urea's bitterness, then we may infer they share peripheral physiological mechanisms involved in bitter taste. All compounds were intensity matched in each of 13 subjects, so the judgments of adaptation or bitterness inhibition would be based on equal initial magnitudes and, therefore, directly comparable. In the first experiment, cross-adaptation of bitterness between the amino acids was high (>80%) and reciprocal. Urea and quinine-HCl (control) did not cross-adapt with the amino acids symmetrically. In a second experiment, the sodium salts, NaCl and Na gluconate, did not differentially inhibit the bitterness of L-trp, L-phe and urea, but the control compound, MgSO(4), was differentially affected. The bitter inhibition experiment supports the hypothesis that L-trp, L-phe and urea share peripheral bitter taste mechanisms, while the adaptation experiment revealed subtle differences between urea and the amino acids indicating that urea and the amino acids activate only partially overlapping bitter taste mechanisms.     

Receptor Polymorphism and Genomic Structure Interact to Shape Bitter Taste Perception

The ability to taste bitterness evolved to safeguard most animals, including humans, against potentially toxic substances, thereby leading to food rejection. Nonetheless, bitter perception is subject to individual variations due to the presence of genetic functional polymorphisms in bitter taste receptor (TAS2R) genes, such as the long-known association between genetic polymorphisms in TAS2R38 and bitter taste perception of phenylthiocarbamide. Yet, due to overlaps in specificities across receptors, such associations with a single TAS2R locus are uncommon. Therefore, to investigate more complex associations, we examined taste responses to six structurally diverse compounds (absinthin, amarogentin, cascarillin, grosheimin, quassin, and quinine) in a sample of the Caucasian population. By sequencing all bitter receptor loci, inferring long-range haplotypes, mapping their effects on phenotype variation, and characterizing functionally causal allelic variants, we deciphered at the molecular level how a subjects’ genotype for the whole-family of TAS2R genes shapes variation in bitter taste perception. Within each haplotype block implicated in phenotypic variation, we provided evidence for at least one locus harboring functional polymorphic alleles, e.g. one locus for sensitivity to amarogentin, one of the most bitter natural compounds known, and two loci for sensitivity to grosheimin, one of the bitter compounds of artichoke. Our analyses revealed also, besides simple associations, complex associations of bitterness sensitivity across TAS2R loci. Indeed, even if several putative loci harbored both high- and low-sensitivity alleles, phenotypic variation depended on linkage between these alleles. When sensitive alleles for bitter compounds were maintained in the same linkage phase, genetically driven perceptual differences were obvious, e.g. for grosheimin. On the contrary, when sensitive alleles were in opposite phase, only weak genotype-phenotype associations were seen, e.g. for absinthin, the bitter principle of the beverage absinth. These findings illustrate the extent to which genetic influences on taste are complex, yet arise from both receptor activation patterns and linkage structure among receptor genes.     

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TASTE AND CHEWING PATTERNS OF VISCO-ELASTIC MODEL FOODS

The jaw movements and muscular activity of masticatory muscles of five assessors, having bitterness thresholds about 8 μM quinine in water, were monitored throughout chewing of similar strength gelatin gels containing 0, 40, 70 or 100 μM quinine. Gel bitterness ratings were not related to sensory texture which was 78kN/m² by shear test. On average, 100 μM quinine gels were as bitter as 7 to 30 μM quinine in water, depending on the assessor. Chewing patterns were not affected by concentration of quinine in the gels. During mastication of acceptable gels, there appears to be no feedback from taste to the motor control of mastication. In gels of the same consistency and the same concentration of quinine, assessors who chewed more rated higher for bitterness. The implications for mimicking mastication by machine and the training of assessors for solid foods are discussed.     

Evaluation of the bitterness of green tea catechins by a cell-based assay with the human bitter taste receptor hTAS2R39

Catechins have a broad range of physiological functions and act as the main taste ingredient of green tea. Although catechins show a strong bitterness, the bitter taste receptor for catechins has not been fully understood. The objective of this study was to identify the receptor for the major green tea catechins such as (−)-epicatechin (EC), (−)-epicatechin gallate (ECg), (−)-epigallocatechin (EGC), and (−)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCg). By the cell-based assay using cultured cells expressing human bitter taste receptor, a clear response of hTAS2R39-expressing cells was observed to 300 μM of either ECg or EGCg, which elicit a strong bitterness in humans. The response of hTAS2R39-expressing cells to ECg was the strongest among the tested catechins, followed by EGCg. Because the cellular response to EC and EGC is much weaker than those of ECg and EGCg, galloyl groups was strongly supposed to be involved in the bitter intensity. This finding is similar to the observations of taste intensity obtained from a human sensory study. Our results suggest the participation of hTAS2R39 in the detection of catechins in humans, indicating the possibility that bitterness of tea catechins can be evaluated by using cells expressing hTAS2R39.     

Supertasting and PROP bitterness depends on more than the TAS2R38 gene

Polymorphisms in the TAS2R38 gene provide insight to phenotypes long associated 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and phenylthiocarbamide bitterness. We tested relationships between TAS2R38 genotype, taste phenotype, and fungiform papillae (FP) number in 139 females and 59 males (age range 21-60 years), primarily of European ancestry. DNA was analyzed for 3 polymorphic sites, identifying common (alanine-valine-isoleucine [AVI/AVI], heterozygotes, proline-alanine-valine [PAV/PAV]) and rare (proline-valine-isoleucine, alanine-alanine-valine, AAI) forms. Individuals with PROP threshold >0.15 mM were almost exclusively AVI/AVI; those with threshold <0.1 mM could have any genotype. PAV/PAVs were more difficult to identify with PROP taste measures, although perceived bitterness of moderate PROP concentrations (0.32, 1 mM) had better correspondence with genotype than did threshold. For AVI/AVIs, increases in bitterness from 1 to 3.2 mM PROP nearly paralleled those of TAS2R38 heterozygotes and PAV/PAVs. Some bitterness gains were related to FP number sampled from a standard area on the tongue tip, yet the PROP bitterness-FP relationship differed across genotype. Among homozygotes, FP was a significant determinant of PROP bitterness; heterozygotes showed a flat relationship. Those tasting concentrated PROP as more bitter also tasted concentrated sucrose, citric acid, sodium chloride, and quinine as more intense, even after statistically controlling for TAS2R38 genotype, FP, and intensity of tones (nonoral standard). To summarize, although PROP threshold generally exhibited single-gene complete dominance, PROP bitterness may involve additional bitter receptors as evidenced by misclassification of some nontaster homozygotes and the bitterness functions for concentrated PROP. Variability in receptor expression may explain attenuated bitterness-FP relationships. PROP bitterness does associate with heightened taste sensations (i.e., supertasting), but this is not due to TAS2R38 polymorphisms.     

An intensity/time study of the taste of amino acids

An intensity/time study of the taste of selected amino acidswas carried out. Intensity, persistence and total gustatoryresponse were assessed at five concentrations. Ten amino acidswere assessed for sweetness and eleven amino acids were assessedfor bitterness, four amino acids being assessed for both sweetnessand bitterness. Both a linear function and a power function,I = Kcⁿ (where I is taste intensity, c is concentration, K isa constant and n is the exponent of taste intensity), were fittedto the data. The accession efficiencies for taste recognitionand taste detection were found. Kinetic equations were usedto find K_m, the affinity of the receptor site for the sapidmolecule. Limited relationships between chemical structure ofthe amino acids and their temporal properties were found.     

Formation of Dendrolasin,Sesquirosefuran, Perillene and Rosefuran by Biomimetic Autooxidation

To estimate the steric distance between the bitter taste determinant sites in peptides, some cyclic dipeptides, amino acid anilides, amino acid cyclohexylamides, and benzoyl amino acids were synthesized and their tastes were evaluated. The diketopiperazine ring of cyclic dipeptides acted as a bitter taste determinant site due to its hydrophobicity. The steric distance between 2 sites was estimated as 4.1 Å from the molecule models of cyclic dipeptides composed of typical amino acids in the bitter peptides. Due to the hypothesis of two bitter taste determinant sites, which bind with the bitter taste receptor via a “binding unit” and a “stimulating unit,” a mechanism for the bitterness in peptides was postulated.     

Stimulation of bitterness by capsaicin and menthol: differences between lingual areas innervated by the glossopharyngeal and chorda tympani nerves

Capsaicin is viewed as a purely chemesthetic stimulus that selectively stimulates the somatosensory system. Here we show that when applied to small areas of the tongue, capsaicin can produce a bitter taste as well as sensory irritation. In experiment 1, individuals were screened for the ability to perceive bitterness from capsaicin on the circumvallate papillae. Fifteen of 25 subjects who reported at least weak bitterness rated the intensity of taste, irritation and coolness produced by 100-320 microM capsaicin and 100-320 mM menthol applied via cotton swabs to the tip (fungiform region), the posterior edge (foliate region), and the dorsal posterior surface (circumvallate region) of the tongue. Sucrose, citric acid, sodium chloride and quinine hydrochloride were applied to the same areas to assess tastes responsiveness. On average, capsaicin and menthol produced "moderate" bitterness (and no other significant taste qualities) in the circumvallate region, and weaker bitterness on the side and tip of the tongue. Sensory irritation from capsaicin was rated significantly higher at the tongue tip, whereas menthol coolness was rated higher in the circumvallate region. In experiment 2 we applied sucrose and quinine hydrochloride together with capsaicin to investigate the effects other taste stimuli might have on capsaicin's reported bitterness. As expected, adding quinine produced stronger bitterness in the circumvallate and fungiform regions, and adding sucrose significantly reduced the bitterness of capsaicin in the circumvallate region. Overall, the results suggest that capsaicin and menthol are capable of stimulating a subset of taste neurons that respond to bitter substances, perhaps via receptor-gated ion channels like those recently found in capsaicin- and menthol-sensitive trigeminal ganglion neurons, and that the glossopharyngeal nerve may contain more such neurons than the chorda tympani nerve. That some people fail to perceive bitterness from capsaicin further implies that the incidence of capsaicin-sensitive taste neurons varies across people as well as between gustatory nerves.     

Differential covariation in taste responsiveness to bitter stimuli in rats

Variation exists in the sensitivity of individual rodents and humans to different bitter tastants. An absence of uniform correlation in responsiveness to different bitter substances across individuals within a species suggests heterogeneity in the mechanisms underlying stimulus processing within this taste modality. Here, we examined taste responsiveness of individual rats to three bitter compounds (quinine hydrochloride, denatonium benzoate, and cycloheximide) in short-term lick tests to determine the magnitude of covariation among responses to these stimuli and infer commonalities in their receptor and neural mechanisms. Rats were tested with a given pair of bitter stimuli during three sessions comprising randomized trial blocks of six concentrations of each stimulus + deionized water. Psychophysical functions were generated for individual rats for respective stimulus pairs, and concentrations of each stimulus that produced equivalent lick suppression relative to water were correlated across animals. Behavioral taste responsiveness to quinine hydrochloride strongly covaried with responsiveness to denatonium benzoate (r = +0.82). Lick responsiveness to quinine was less robustly correlated with that to cycloheximide (r = +0.44), and denatonium and cycloheximide responses failed to correlate. These results imply substantial overlap in the bitter taste coding mechanisms for quinine and denatonium but some degree of independence in the mechanisms responsible for gustatory processing of cycloheximide. More generally, these data reinforce the notion that bitter taste processing is not a homogeneous event.     

Age-Related Differences in Bitter Taste and Efficacy of Bitter Blockers

Background

Bitter taste is the primary culprit for rejection of pediatric liquid medications. We probed the underlying biology of bitter sensing and the efficacy of two known bitter blockers in children and adults.

Methods

A racially diverse group of 154 children (3-10 years old) and their mothers (N = 118) evaluated the effectiveness of two bitter blockers, sodium gluconate (NaG) and monosodium glutamate (MSG), for five food-grade bitter compounds (quinine, denatonium benzoate, caffeine, propylthiouracil (PROP), urea) using a forced-choice method of paired comparisons. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov ({"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01407939","term_id":"NCT01407939"}}NCT01407939).

Results

The blockers reduced bitterness in 7 of 10 bitter-blocker combinations for adults but only 3 of 10 for children, suggesting that efficacy depends on age and is also specific to each bitter-blocker combination. Only the bitterness of urea was reduced by both blockers in both age groups, whereas the bitterness of PROP was not reduced by either blocker in either age group regardless of TAS2R38 genotype. Children liked the salty taste of the blocker NaG more than did adults, but both groups liked the savory taste of MSG equally.

Conclusions and Relevance

Bitter blocking was less effective in children, and the efficacy of blocking was both age and compound specific. This knowledge will pave the way for evidence-based strategies to help develop better-tasting medicines and highlights the conclusion that adult panelists and genotyping alone may not always be appropriate in evaluating the taste of a drug geared for children.     

Two-stimulus versus one-stimulus procedure in the framework of functional measurement: a comparative investigation using quinine HCl/NaCl mixtures

When subjects are requested to judge single stimuli the observableresponses are the result of both sensory and judgmental processes.De Graaf et al. (1987) employed functional measurement in combinationwith a two-stimulus procedure in order to separate these twotypes of processes. This paper discusses the results of twoexperiments investigating taste interactions in quinine HCl/NaClmixtures. The first experiment employed a one-stimulus procedure,the second experiment employed De Graaf et al.'s two-stimulusprocedure. Comparing the two procedures, the main advantageof the one-stimulus procedure seems to lie in its simplicity.In addition, it enables the determination of a scale value forwater. However, the obtained ratings are context-dependent andare affected by end effects of the response scale. The mostimportant benefit of the two-stimulus procedure is that it allowsfor a post-experimental verification of the linearity of theresponse-output function. This check ensures that all scalevalues are assessed on an interval scale. If water can be assumedto be tasteless, ratio scale values can be obtained. It wasshown that quinine bitterness is largely suppressed by NaCl,whilst the saltiness intensity elicited by NaCl remains virtuallyunaffected. In both experiments, the perceived total taste intensityof a mixture could be well predicted by the weighted sum ofthe saltiness and bitterness sensations within the mixture percept.     

Heritability and genetic covariation of sensitivity to PROP, SOA, quinine HCl, and caffeine

The perceived bitterness intensity for bitter solutions of propylthiouracil (PROP), sucrose octa-acetate (SOA), quinine HCl and caffeine were examined in a genetically informative sample of 392 females and 313 males (mean age of 17.8 +/- 3.1 years), including 62 monozygotic and 131 dizygotic twin pairs and 237 sib pairs. Broad-sense heritabilities were estimated at 0.72, 0.28, 0.34, and 0.30 for PROP, SOA, quinine, and caffeine, respectively, for perceived intensity measures. Modeling showed 1) a group factor which explained a large amount of the genetic variation in SOA, quinine, and caffeine (22-28% phenotypic variation), 2) a factor responsible for all the genetic variation in PROP (72% phenotypic variation), which only accounted for 1% and 2% of the phenotypic variation in SOA and caffeine, respectively, and 3) a modest specific genetic factor for quinine (12% phenotypic variation). Unique environmental influences for all four compounds were due to a single factor responsible for 7-22% of phenotypic variation. The results suggest that the perception of PROP and the perception of SOA, quinine, and caffeine are influenced by two distinct sets of genes.     

Comparison of bitterness of caffeine and quinine by a time - intensity procedure

Temporal bitterness sequences elicited by four equi-bitter concentrationsof caffeine and quinine were evaluated by a time – intensityprocedure. For both compounds, the increase in bitterness intensitywas highly correlated with an increased duration of aftertaste,although the time to maximum intensity did not change. For equi-bittersolutions, the duration of aftertaste was influenced by thespecific tastant, and was longer for caffeine. Caffeine eliciteda faster maximum rate of onset and slower maximum rate of decayof bitterness. Only one significant difference between subjectswho were sensitive to l-phenyl-2-thiourca (PTC) and those whowere non-tasters was found. Tasters rated the maximum intensityof quinine solutions higher than non-tasters.     

灵长类苦味受体基因研究进展

在鲜味、甜味、苦味、咸味和酸味5种味觉形式中,苦味能避免动物摄入有毒有害物质,在动物的生存中发挥着特别重要的作用。苦味味觉的产生依赖于苦味物质与苦味受体的相互作用。苦味受体由苦味受体基因Tas2rs编码,此类基因在不同物种中数量变化较大以适应不同的需求。目前的研究在灵长类中鉴别出了若干苦味受体的配体,并发现有的苦味受体基因所经受的选择压在类群之间、基因之间甚至同一基因不同功能区之间都存在着变化。本文从苦味受体作用的多样性特点,受体与配体的对应关系、受体基因进化模式与食性之间的关系、苦味受体基因的适应性进化方面对灵长类苦味受体基因进行了综述,以期为苦味受体基因在灵长类中的深入研究提供参考。