The histone H1°/H5 variant and terminal differentiation of cells during development of Xenopus laevis

The maintenance of the differentiated condition is supposed to be associated with the presence of a histone of the H1(0)/H5 subclass. If the H1(0)/H5 variant has an important role in differentiation distinct from that of H1, it should display differential expression in time and position during development. Here we report that this prediction is verified during Xenopus laevis development, in which tadpoles exhibit a very characteristic, developmentally regulated pattern of histone H1(0)/H5 expression that is different for the derivatives of each embryonic germ layer. However, the pattern of appearance of this variant during development does not reflect a simple correlation between its presence and the state of differentiation. Therefore, these results are pertinent to current ideas on differentiation and the involvement of lysine-rich histones in the repression of eukaryotic genes.     

The histone H5 variant in Xenopus laevis

The presumptive histone H5 of Xenopus laevis has been characterized by SDS and acid-urea-Triton polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and compared with chicken histone H5. Chicken H5 has a lower electrophoretic mobility compared to that of Xenopus H5 in both gel systems. It is shown, using a polyclonal antiserum against chicken H5, that the Xenopus histone H5 is immunologically related to chicken histone H5. Monoclonal antibodies have been prepared to the Xenopus histone types H5 and H1A, that do not cross-react, as determined by their reactivity in an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay and by their ability to react with either H1A or H5 in an immunochemical test on total erythrocyte histones that are transferred to nitrocellulose after fractionation by SDS- or acid-urea polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. As all nuclei of erythrocytes from adult Xenopus laevis can be shown to contain histone H1A and H5, these monoclonal antibodies can be used to further delineate the role of H5 in tissue differentiation.     

H1 histone variants in Xenopus laevis

The H1 histones from erythrocytes, livers, intestines, testes, and embryos of Xenopus laevis have been examined electrophoretically. This species has been found to contain at least five electrophoretically resolvable lysine-rich histones in addition to the presumptive H5 histone of erythrocytes. Quantitative and qualitative distinctions between the H1 histones from each source were readily observed. Three H1 histones (H1A, H1B, and H1C) were found in both embryos and adult tissues, although in varying amounts. Two other H1 histones (H1D and H1E) were found only in adult tissues. Comparative SDS gel V8 protease cleavage maps of the lysine-rich histones from testes and erythrocytes have demonstrated that the “adult-specific” H1D and H1E are not artifacts of proteolysis and may be closely related to the presumptive H5 histone. Spermatogenic cells were found to be similar to embryonic cells in being deficient in H1D and H1E. These observations suggest that H1D and H1E are enriched in cell types with low rates of cell division similar to the mammalian H1° histone. The results presented here demonstrate a previously unrecognized degree of developmental and cell-specific variance in the H1 histones of Xenopus laevis.     

Soluble acidic complexes containing histones H3 and H4 in nuclei of Xenopus laevis oocytes

Oocyte nuclei of Xenopus laevis contain nucleosomal-core histones in large amounts and in a soluble, non-chromatin-bound form. Supernatant fractions (100,000 X g) from isolated nuclei are enriched in complexes containing histones H3 and H4, which are of distinct size (5.6S by sucrose gradient centrifugation, approximate molecular weight of 270,000 by gel filtration) and negatively charged (isoelectric at pH 4.4). These complexes bind to DEAE-Sephacel and can be separated from nucleoplasmin. In diverse fractionation experiments, histones H3 and H4 have been found to comigrate with a pair of polypeptides of molecular weight 110,000 that represent the most acidic major protein present in these nuclei. After enrichment by gel filtration, ion exchange chromatography and electrophoresis, this pair of acidic polypeptides has been the only nonhistone protein detected in the histone-complex fraction. We suggest that in the oocyte nucleus, large proportions of the soluble histones H3 and H4 are not contained in complexes of all four nucleosomal-core histones but are differentially associated with specific, very acidic proteins into distinct 5.6S complexes.     

Histone H1 variants differentially inhibit DNA replication through an affinity for chromatin mediated by their carboxyl-terminal domains

Multiple forms of histone H1 are found in most mammalian tissues, and diversity in their temporal and spatial expression likely corresponds to diversity in function. Here, using Xenopus egg extracts, we show that while the somatic H1s significantly inhibit DNA replication in Xenopus sperm nuclei, little or no inhibition is seen in the case of the testes-specific variant, H1t. We suggest that differences in H1-chromatin interactions might explain some of the diversity in H1 function. To demonstrate this, we show that the somatic H1 variants preferentially assemble into chromatin relative to H1t. Differences in chromatin structure are seen depending on whether chromatin assembly occurs in the presence of somatic H1s or H1t. These data suggest that the mechanistic basis for some of the functional differences of H1 variants lies in their relative affinity for chromatin. Using a series of domain-switch mutants of H1(0) and H1t we identify the H1 carboxyl-terminal domains as the domains responsible for the differential affinity for chromatin and, concurrently, for the differential effects of H1 variants upon DNA replication.     

Differential response of cycling and noncycling cells to inducers of DNA synthesis and mitosis

The objective of this study was to determine whether cells in G(0) phase are functionally distinct from those in G(1) with regard to their ability to respond to the inducers of DNA synthesis and to retard the cell cycle traverse of the G(2) component after fusion. Synchronized populations of HeLa cells in G(1) and human diploid fibroblasts in G(1) and G(0) phases were separately fused using UV-inactivated Sendai virus with HeLa cells prelabeled with [(3)H]ThdR and synchronized in S or G(2) phases. The kinetics of initiation of DNA synthesis in the nuclei of G(0) and G(1) cells residing in G(0)/S and G(1)/S dikaryons, respectively, were studied as a function of time after fusion. In the G(0)/G(2) and G(1)/G(2) fusions, the rate of entry into mitosis of the heterophasic binucleate cells was monitored in the presence of Colcemid. The effects of protein synthesis inhibition in the G(1) cells, and the UV irradiation of G(0) cells before fusion, on the rate of entry of the G(2) component into mitosis were also studied. The results of this study indicate that DNA synthesis can be induced in G(0)nuclei after fusion between G(0)- and S-phase cells, but G(0) nuclei are much slower than G(1) nuclei in responding to the inducers of DNA synthesis because the chromatin of G(0) cells is more condensed than it is in G(1) cells. A more interesting observation resulting from this study is that G(0) cells is more condensed than it is in G(1) cells. A more interesting observation resulting from this study is that G(0) cells differ from G(1) cells with regard to their effects on the cell cycle progression of the G(2) nucleus into mitosis. This difference between G(0) and G(1) cells appears to depend on certain factors, probably nonhistone proteins, present in G(1) cells but absent in G(0) cells. These factors can be induced in G(0) cells by UV irradiation and inhibited in G(1) cells by cycloheximide treatment.     

Expression of mouse histone H1(0) promoter sequences following microinjection into Xenopus oocytes and developing embryos

Evidence from expression studies using transfected F9 teratocarcinoma stem cells indicates that the synthesis of the H1(0) histone is turned on very soon after the cells have been treated with retinoic acid, which causes them to differentiate into murine parietal endoderm. This increase in H1(0) at the time of commitment would allow a reorganization of the chromatin with a reprogramming of the gene activity of undifferentiated F9 cells to the differentiated state. The particular interest of the further development of this differentiation model is to answer the question whether this specific stimulation of expression can be induced only in homologous differentiation systems, or whether the identified H1(0) promoter sequences can also be specifically stimulated by heterologous factors. We therefore injected the mammalian H1(0) promoter sequences into Xenopus oocytes and fertilized eggs. The results of oocyte injection experiments indicate that H1(0) promoter sequence elements similar to those used in transfected F9 cells are specifically expressed in the oocyte. For analysis of H1(0) expression in Xenopus embryos we used promoter constructs ligated to beta-galactosidase sequences for microinjection. This procedure allows a particularly rapid and complete detection of expressed promoter clones within the differentiated tissues of the early Xenopus embryo.     

The roles of the MCM, ORC, and Cdc6 proteins in determining the replication competence of chromatin in quiescent cells

Most eukaryotic cell types can withdraw from proliferative cell cycles and remain quiescent for extended periods. Intact nuclei isolated from quiescent murine NIH3T3 cells fail to replicate in vitro when incubated in Xenopus egg extracts, although intact nuclei from proliferating cells replicate well. Permeabilization of the nuclear envelope rescues the ability of quiescent nuclei to replicate in the extract. We show that origin replication complex (ORC), minichromosome maintenance (MCM), and Cdc6 proteins are all present in early quiescent cells. Immunodepletion of Cdc6 or the MCM complex from Xenopus egg extract inhibits replication of permeable, quiescent, but not proliferating, NIH3T3 nuclei. Immunoblotting results demonstrate that mouse homologues of Mcm2, Mcm5, and Cdc6 are displaced from chromatin in quiescent cells. However, this absence of chromatin-bound Cdc6 and MCM proteins from quiescent cells appears not to be due to the absence of ORC subunits as murine homologues of Orc1 and Orc2 remain chromatin-bound in quiescent cells. Surprisingly, intact quiescent nuclei fail to bind exogenously added XCdc6 or to replicate in Xenopus egg extracts immunodepleted of ORC, even though G1- or S-phase nuclei still replicate in these extracts. Our results identify Cdc6 and the MCM complex as essential replication components absent from quiescent chromatin due to nonfunctional chromatin-bound ORC proteins. These results can explain why quiescent mammalian nuclei are unable to replicate in vivo and in Xenopus egg extracts.     

Monoclonal antibodies against histone H5. Epitope mapping and binding to chromatin

Monoclonal antibodies against chicken erythrocyte histone H5 were produced. Nine hybridomas of different clonal origin were selected, and the antibodies were purified by affinity chromatography. Typing of the antibodies indicated that all but one (IgM) belong to the IgG1 class and contain kappa light chains. Indirect immunoprecipitation, solid-phase radioimmunoassay, and competitive inhibition assays using various H5 fragments revealed that the antigen-binding sites were localized on the central region of H5 (GH5, residues 22-100). Results of immunoblots from gels containing different denaturing agents indicate that some of the antibodies recognize related continuous epitopes localized at the junction of the GH5 with the rest of the molecule. Competition experiments between pairs of the eight different IgGs suggest that they recognize at least seven distinct sites on GH5. The epitopes appear to represent different regions of GH5 although some of them overlap. In general, the antibodies recognize epitopes which are not too accessible to the environment in the native conformation of the histone. All of the antibodies examined, except one of them (5H10), react with nuclei and chromatin from the erythroid cells but not from other cell lines. The site recognized by 5H10 is likely to be one of the regions where GH5 interacts with the nucleosome. No cross-reactivity of the antibodies with other histones including H1, H2A, H2B, H3, H4, and rat liver histone H1(0) was observed.     

DNA replication and H5 histone exchange during reactivation of chick erythrocyte nuclei in heterokaryons

Fusion of terminally differentiated chick erythrocytes (CE) with replicating quail myoblasts or established L6J1 rat myoblasts results in reactivation of DNA synthesis in the dormant CE nuclei and in suppression of DNA synthesis in the myoblast nuclei. The nuclei of primary quail myoblasts are more effectively inhibited than the nuclei of established rat myoblasts. Inhibition of DNA replication occurs not only by preventing G1 nuclei from entering S-phase but also by blocking nuclei in S-phase and by delaying nuclei in G2 from undergoing mitosis and starting a new DNA replication cycle. No inhibition of DNA synthesis could be observed when mouse erythrocytes, i.e., erythrocytes lacking nuclei, were fused with rat myoblasts to generate mouse-globin-containing L6J1 cybrids. — Reactivation of CE nuclei is associated with a loss of the tissuespecific H5 histone variant. Complete elimination of H5 histone, however, does not seem to be a necessary prerequisite for the initiation or completion of DNA replication in CE nuclei since H5 antigens are found on reactivated G1, S, and G2 nuclei.     

The organisation and expression of histone genes from Xenopus borealis.

We have isolated genomic clones from Xenopus borealis representing 3 different types of histone gene cluster. We show that the major type (H1, H2B, H2A, H4, H3), present at about 60-70 copies per haploid genome (1), is tandemly reiterated with a repeat length of 15 kb. In situ hybridization to mitotic chromosomes shows that the majority of histone genes in Xenopus borealis are at one locus. This locus is on the long arm of one of the small sub-metacentric chromosomes. A minor cluster type with the gene order H1, H3, H4, H2A is present at about 10-15 copies. The genome also contains rare or unique cluster types present at less than 5 copies having other types of organisation. An isolate of this type had the gene order H1, H4, H2B, H2A, H1 (no H3 cloned). Microinjection of all of the clones into Xenopus laevis oocyte nuclei shows that most of the genes present are functional or potentially functional and a number of variant histone proteins have been observed. S1 mapping experiments confirm that the genes of the major cluster are expressed in all tissues and at all developmental stages examined.     

DNA replication in quiescent cell nuclei: regulation by the nuclear envelope and chromatin structure

Quiescent nuclei from differentiated somatic cells can reacquire pluripotence, the capacity to replicate, and reinitiate a program of differentiation after transplantation into amphibian eggs. The replication of quiescent nuclei is recapitulated in extracts derived from activated Xenopus eggs; therefore, we have exploited this cell-free system to explore the mechanisms that regulate initiation of replication in nuclei from terminally differentiated Xenopus erythrocytes. We find that these nuclei lack many, if not all, pre-replication complex (pre-RC) proteins. Pre-RC proteins from the extract form a stable association with the chromatin of permeable nuclei, which replicate in this system, but not with the chromatin of intact nuclei, which do not replicate, even though these proteins cross an intact nuclear envelope. During extract incubation, the linker histones H1 and H1(0) are removed from erythrocyte chromatin by nucleoplasmin. We show that H1 removal facilitates the replication of permeable nuclei by increasing the frequency of initiation most likely by promoting the assembly of pre-RCs on chromatin. These data indicate that initiation in erythrocyte nuclei requires the acquisition of pre-RC proteins from egg extract and that pre-RC assembly requires the loss of nuclear envelope integrity and is facilitated by the removal of linker histone H1 from chromatin.     

Histone H1(0): a maintainer of the differentiated cell state?

Functional and structural effects of histones H1 and H1(0) were studied on isolated chromatin and nuclei from embryonic skeletal muscle as well as on cultured cells. The results showed that: H1 was responsible for a greater compaction of chromatin than H1(0) as evidenced by sedimentation. In contrast, H1(0) inhibited DNA synthesis in chromatin and cells to a greater extent than H1. No significant difference between the two histones on RNA synthesis inhibition was observed. histones H1 and H1(0) evidenced a quantitative increase in developing muscle cells. The results indicate that H1(0) may not be the inducer of the differentiated cell state, but rather assists in the maintenance of that state.