The structure and function of the bacterial chromosome

Advances in microscopic and cell biological techniques have considerably improved our understanding of bacterial chromosome organization and dynamics. The nucleoid was formerly perceived to be an amorphous entity divided into ill-defined domains of supercoiling that are randomly deposited in the cell. Recent work, however, has demonstrated a remarkable degree of spatial organization. A highly ordered chromosome structure, established while DNA replication and partitioning are in progress, is maintained and propagated during growth. Duplication of the chromosome and partitioning of the newly generated daughter strands are interwoven processes driven by the dynamic interplay between the synthesis, segregation and condensation of DNA. These events are intimately coupled with the bacterial cell cycle and exhibit a previously unanticipated complexity reminiscent of eukaryotic systems.     

Chromosome structuring limits genome plasticity in Escherichia coli

Chromosome organizations of related bacterial genera are well conserved despite a very long divergence period. We have assessed the forces limiting bacterial genome plasticity in Escherichia coli by measuring the respective effect of altering different parameters, including DNA replication, compositional skew of replichores, coordination of gene expression with DNA replication, replication-associated gene dosage, and chromosome organization into macrodomains. Chromosomes were rearranged by large inversions. Changes in the compositional skew of replichores, in the coordination of gene expression with DNA replication or in the replication-associated gene dosage have only a moderate effect on cell physiology because large rearrangements inverting the orientation of several hundred genes inside a replichore are only slightly detrimental. By contrast, changing the balance between the two replication arms has a more drastic effect, and the recombinational rescue of replication forks is required for cell viability when one of the chromosome arms is less than half than the other one. Macrodomain organization also appears to be a major factor restricting chromosome plasticity, and two types of inverted configurations severely affect the cell cycle. First, the disruption of the Ter macrodomain with replication forks merging far from the normal replichore junction provoked chromosome segregation defects. The second major problematic configurations resulted from inversions between Ori and Right macrodomains, which perturb nucleoid distribution and early steps of cytokinesis. Consequences for the control of the bacterial cell cycle and for the evolution of bacterial chromosome configuration are discussed.     

Nucleoid organization in the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans

Processes favoring the exceptional resistance to genotoxic stress of Deinococcus radiodurans are not yet completely characterized. It was postulated that its nucleoid and chromosome(s) organization could participate in the DNA double strand break repair process. Here, we investigated the organization of chromosome 1 by localization of three chromosomal loci including oriC, Ter and a locus located in its left arm. For this purpose, we used a ParB‐parS system to visualize the position of the loci before and after exposure to γ‐rays. By comparing the number of fluorescent foci with the number of copies of the studied loci present in the cells measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), we demonstrated that the 4–10 copies of chromosome 1 per cell are dispersed within the nucleoid before irradiation, indicating that the chromosome copies are not prealigned. Chromosome segregation is progressive but not co‐ordinated, allowing each locus to be paired with its sister during part of the cell cycle. After irradiation, the nucleoid organization is modified, involving a transient alignment of the loci in the late stage of DNA repair and a delay of segregation of the Ter locus. We discuss how these events can influence DNA double strand break repair.     

Synchronization of Chromosome Dynamics and Cell Division in Bacteria

Bacterial cells have evolved a variety of regulatory circuits that tightly synchronize their chromosome replication and cell division cycles, thereby ensuring faithful transmission of genetic information to their offspring. Complex multicomponent signaling cascades are used to monitor the progress of cytokinesis and couple replication initiation to the separation of the two daughter cells. Moreover, the cell-division apparatus actively participates in chromosome partitioning and, particularly, in the resolution of topological problems that impede the segregation process, thus coordinating chromosome dynamics with cell constriction. Finally, bacteria have developed mechanisms that harness the cell-cycle-dependent positioning of individual chromosomal loci or the nucleoid to define the cell-division site and control the timing of divisome assembly. Each of these systems manages to integrate a complex set of spatial and temporal cues to regulate and execute critical steps in the bacterial cell cycle.In recent years, considerable progress has been made in understanding the cell biology of bacteria and, in particular, the organization and dynamics of their chromosomes (Shih and Rothfield 2006; Graumann 2007; Morris and Jensen 2008; Reyes-Lamothe et al. 2008b; Thanbichler and Shapiro 2008). It has emerged that bacterial cells have evolved a variety of mechanisms to closely coordinate replication and segregation of chromosomal DNA with cell division, thus ensuring that genetic information is passed on faithfully. In the absence of these regulatory circuits, premature formation of a division septum can lead to dissection of the nucleoid and generation of anucleate cells. Conversely, untimely origin firing before the end of cell division may result in the accumulation of supernumerary chromosomes, thereby interfering with proper cell cycle and gene regulation, and loading the cell with a substantial metabolic burden. This article first summarizes our current knowledge on checkpoints that couple replication initiation and the last stages of chromosome segregation to the progression of cell constriction. Subsequently, it discusses effects of chromosome dynamics on the temporal and spatial control of divisome assembly.     

The chromosome cycle of prokaryotes

In both eukaryotes and prokaryotes, chromosomal DNA undergoes replication, condensation–decondensation and segregation, sequentially, in some fixed order. Other conditions, like sister‐chromatid cohesion (SCC), may span several chromosomal events. One set of these chromosomal transactions within a single cell cycle constitutes the ‘chromosome cycle’. For many years it was generally assumed that the prokaryotic chromosome cycle follows major phases of the eukaryotic one: –replication–condensation–segregation–(cell division)–decondensation–, with SCC of unspecified length. Eventually it became evident that, in contrast to the strictly consecutive chromosome cycle of eukaryotes, all stages of the prokaryotic chromosome cycle run concurrently. Thus, prokaryotes practice ‘progressive’ chromosome segregation separated from replication by a brief SCC, and all three transactions move along the chromosome at the same fast rate. In other words, in addition to replication forks, there are ‘segregation forks’ in prokaryotic chromosomes. Moreover, the bulk of prokaryotic DNA outside the replication–segregation transition stays compacted. I consider possible origins of this concurrent replication–segregation and outline the ‘nucleoid administration’ system that organizes the dynamic part of the prokaryotic chromosome cycle.     

Overview of controls in the Escherichia coli cell cycle

The harmonious growth and cell-to-cell uniformity of steady-state bacterial populations indicate the existence of a well-regulated cell cycle, responding to a set of internal signals. In Escherichia coli, the key events of this cycle are the initiation of DNA replication, nucleoid segregation and the initiation of cell division. The replication initiator is the DnaA protein. In nucleoid segregation, the MukB protein, required for proper partitioning, may be a member of the myosin-kinesin superfamily of mechanoenzymes. In cell division, the FtsZ protein has a tubulin motif, is a GTPase and polymerizes in a ring around midcell during septation; the FtsA protein has an actin-like structure. The nature of the internal signals triggering these events is not known but candidates include cell mass, the superhelical density of the chromosome and the concentration of two regulatory nucleotides, cyclic AMP and ppGpp. The involvement of cytoskeletal-like proteins in key cycle events encourages the notion of a fundamental biological unity in cell cycle regulation in all organisms.     

A Replication-Inhibited Unsegregated Nucleoid at Mid-Cell Blocks Z-Ring Formation and Cell Division Independently of SOS and the SlmA Nucleoid Occlusion Protein in Escherichia coli

Chromosome replication and cell division of Escherichia coli are coordinated with growth such that wild-type cells divide once and only once after each replication cycle. To investigate the nature of this coordination, the effects of inhibiting replication on Z-ring formation and cell division were tested in both synchronized and exponentially growing cells with only one replicating chromosome. When replication elongation was blocked by hydroxyurea or nalidixic acid, arrested cells contained one partially replicated, compact nucleoid located mid-cell. Cell division was strongly inhibited at or before the level of Z-ring formation. DNA cross-linking by mitomycin C delayed segregation, and the accumulation of about two chromosome equivalents at mid-cell also blocked Z-ring formation and cell division. Z-ring inhibition occurred independently of SOS, SlmA-mediated nucleoid occlusion, and MinCDE proteins and did not result from a decreased FtsZ protein concentration. We propose that the presence of a compact, incompletely replicated nucleoid or unsegregated chromosome masses at the normal mid-cell division site inhibits Z-ring formation and that the SOS system, SlmA, and MinC are not required for this inhibition.     

Delayed nucleoid segregation in Escherichia coli

To study the role of cell division in the process of nucleoid segregation, we measured the DNA content of individual nucleoids in isogenic Escherichia coli cell division mutants by image cytometry. In pbpB(Ts) and ftsZ strains growing as filaments at 42 degrees C, nucleoids contained, on average, more than two chromosome equivalents compared with 1.6 in wild-type cells. Because similar results were obtained with a pbpB recA strain, the increased DNA content cannot be ascribed to the occurrence of chromosome dimers. From the determination of the amount of DNA per cell and per individual nucleoid after rifampicin inhibition, we estimated the C and D periods (duration of a round of replication and time between termination and cell division respectively), as well as the D' period (time between termination and nucleoid separation). Compared with the parent strain and in contrast to ftsQ, ftsA and ftsZ mutants, pbpB(Ts) cells growing at the permissive temperature (28 degrees C) showed a long D' period (42 min versus 18 min in the parent) indicative of an extended segregation time. The results indicate that a defective cell division protein such as PbpB not only affects the division process but also plays a role in the last stage of DNA segregation. We propose that PbpB is involved in the assembly of the divisome and that this structure enhances nucleoid segregation.     

Diversity and redundancy in bacterial chromosome segregation mechanisms

Bacterial cells are much smaller and have a much simpler overall structure and organization than eukaryotes. Several prominent differences in cell organization are relevant to the mechanisms of chromosome segregation, particularly the lack of an overt chromosome condensation/decondensation cycle and the lack of a microtubule-based spindle. Although bacterial chromosomes have a rather dispersed appearance, they nevertheless have an underlying high level of spatial organization. During the DNA replication cycle, early replicated (oriC) regions are localized towards the cell poles, whereas the late replicated terminus (terC) region is medially located. This spatial organization is thought to be driven by an active segregation mechanism that separates the sister chromosomes continuously as replication proceeds. Comparisons of various well-characterized bacteria suggest that the mechanisms of chromosome segregation are likely to be diverse, and that in many bacteria, multiple overlapping mechanisms may contribute to efficient segregation. One system in which the molecular mechanisms of chromosome segregation are beginning to be elucidated is that of sporulating cells of Bacillus subtilis. The key components of this system have been identified, and their functions are understood, in outline. Although this system appears to be specialized, most of the functions are conserved widely throughout the bacteria.     

Chromosome and replisome dynamics in E. coli: loss of sister cohesion triggers global chromosome movement and mediates chromosome segregation

Chromosome and replisome dynamics were examined in synchronized E. coli cells undergoing a eukaryotic-like cell cycle. Sister chromosomes remain tightly colocalized for much of S phase and then separate, in a single coordinate transition. Origin and terminus regions behave differently, as functionally independent domains. During separation, sister loci move far apart and the nucleoid becomes bilobed. Origins and terminus regions also move. We infer that sisters are initially linked and that loss of cohesion triggers global chromosome reorganization. This reorganization creates the 2-fold symmetric, ter-in/ori-out conformation which, for E. coli, comprises sister segregation. Analogies with eukaryotic prometaphase suggest that this could be a primordial segregation mechanism to which microtubule-based processes were later added. We see no long-lived replication "factory"; replication initiation timing does not covary with cell mass, and we identify changes in nucleoid position and state that are tightly linked to cell division. We propose that cell division licenses the next round of replication initiation via these changes.     

Inhibition and restart of initiation of chromosome replication: effects on exponentially growing Escherichia coli cells.

Escherichia coli strains in which initiation of chromosome replication could be specifically blocked while other cellular processes continued uninhibited were constructed. Inhibition of replication resulted in a reduced growth rate and in inhibition of cell division after a time period roughly corresponding to the sum of the lengths of the C and D periods. The division inhibition was not mediated by the SOS regulon. The cells became elongated, and a majority contained a centrally located nucleoid with a fully replicated chromosome. The replication block was reversible, and restart of chromosome replication allowed cell division and rapid growth to resume after a time delay. After the resumption, the septum positions were nonrandomly distributed along the length axis of the cells, and a majority of the divisions resulted in at least one newborn cell of normal size and DNA content. With a transient temperature shift, a single synchronous round of chromosome replication and cell division could be induced in the population, making the constructed system useful for studies of cell cycle-specific events. The coordination between chromosome replication, nucleoid segregation, and cell division in E. coli is discussed.     

DNA motifs that sculpt the bacterial chromosome

During the bacterial cell cycle, the processes of chromosome replication, DNA segregation, DNA repair and cell division are coordinated by precisely defined events. Tremendous progress has been made in recent years in identifying the mechanisms that underlie these processes. A striking feature common to these processes is that non-coding DNA motifs play a central part, thus 'sculpting' the bacterial chromosome. Here, we review the roles of these motifs in the mechanisms that ensure faithful transmission of genetic information to daughter cells. We show how their chromosomal distribution is crucial for their function and how it can be analysed quantitatively. Finally, the potential roles of these motifs in bacterial chromosome evolution are discussed.     

Distinct segregation dynamics of the two Vibrio cholerae chromosomes

The study of prokaryotic chromosome segregation has focused primarily on bacteria with single circular chromosomes. Little is known about segregation in bacteria with multipartite genomes. The human diarrhoeal pathogen Vibrio cholerae has two circular chromosomes of unequal sizes. Using static and time-lapse fluorescence microscopy, we visualized the localization and segregation of the origins of replication of the V. cholerae chromosomes. In all stages of the cell cycle, the two origins localized to distinct subcellular locations. In newborn cells, the origin of chromosome I (oriCIvc) was located near the cell pole while the origin of chromosome II (oriCIIvc) was at the cell centre. Segregation of oriCIvc occurred asymmetrically from a polar position, with one duplicated origin traversing the length of the cell towards the opposite pole and the other remaining relatively fixed. In contrast, oriCIIvc segregated later in the cell cycle than oriCIvc and the two duplicated oriCIIvc regions repositioned to the new cell centres. DAPI staining of the nucleoid demonstrated that both origin regions were localized to the edge of the visible nucleoid and that oriCIvc foci were often associated with specific nucleoid substructures. The differences in localization and timing of segregation of oriCIvc and oriCIIvc suggest that distinct mechanisms govern the segregation of the two V. cholerae chromosomes.     

Replication fork passage drives asymmetric dynamics of a critical nucleoid‐associated protein in Caulobacter

In bacteria, chromosome dynamics and gene expression are modulated by nucleoid‐associated proteins (NAPs), but little is known about how NAP activity is coupled to cell cycle progression. Using genomic techniques, quantitative cell imaging, and mathematical modeling, our study in Caulobacter crescentus identifies a novel NAP (GapR) whose activity over the cell cycle is shaped by DNA replication. GapR activity is critical for cellular function, as loss of GapR causes severe, pleiotropic defects in growth, cell division, DNA replication, and chromosome segregation. GapR also affects global gene expression with a chromosomal bias from origin to terminus, which is associated with a similar general bias in GapR binding activity along the chromosome. Strikingly, this asymmetric localization cannot be explained by the distribution of GapR binding sites on the chromosome. Instead, we present a mechanistic model in which the spatiotemporal dynamics of GapR are primarily driven by the progression of the replication forks. This model represents a simple mechanism of cell cycle regulation, in which DNA‐binding activity is intimately linked to the action of DNA replication.     

Upheaval in the bacterial nucleoid. An active chromosome segregation mechanism

Recent advances have completely overturned the classical view of chromosome segregation in bacteria. Far from being a passive process involving gradual separation of the chromosomes, an active, possibly mitotic-like machinery is now known to exist. Soon after the initiation of DNA replication, the newly replicated copies of the oriC region, behaving rather like eukaryotic centromeres, move rapidly apart towards opposite poles of the cell. They then determine the positions that will be taken up by the newly formed sister nucleoids when DNA replication has been completed. Thus, the gradual expansion of the diffuse nucleoid camouflages an underlying active mechanism. Several genes involved in chromosome segregation in bacteria have now been defined; their possible functions are discussed.     

Noc protein binds to specific DNA sequences to coordinate cell division with chromosome segregation

Coordination of chromosome segregation and cytokinesis is crucial for efficient cell proliferation. In Bacillus subtilis, the nucleoid occlusion protein Noc protects the chromosomes by associating with the chromosome and preventing cell division in its vicinity. Using protein localization, ChAP‐on‐Chip and bioinformatics, we have identified a consensus Noc‐binding DNA sequence (NBS), and have shown that Noc is targeted to about 70 discrete regions scattered around the chromosome, though absent from a large region around the replication terminus. Purified Noc bound specifically to an NBS in vitro. NBSs inserted near the replication terminus bound Noc–YFP and caused a delay in cell division. An autonomous plasmid carrying an NBS array recruited Noc–YFP and conferred a severe Noc‐dependent inhibition of cell division. This shows that Noc is a potent inhibitor of division, but that its activity is strictly localized by the interaction with NBS sites in vivo. We propose that Noc serves not only as a spatial regulator of cell division to protect the nucleoid, but also as a timing device with an important role in the coordination of chromosome segregation and cell division.     

Internal structure and dynamics of isolated Escherichia coli nucleoids assessed by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy

The morphology and dynamics of DNA in a bacterial nucleoid affects the kinetics of such major processes as DNA replication, gene expression. and chromosome segregation. In this work, we have applied fluorescence correlation spectroscopy to assess the structure and internal dynamics of isolated Escherichia coli nucleoids. We show that structural information can be extracted from the amplitude of fluorescence correlation spectroscopy correlation functions of randomly labeled nucleoids. Based on the developed formalism we estimate the characteristic size of nucleoid structural units for native, relaxed, and positively supercoiled nucleoids. The degree of supercoiling was varied using the intercalating agent chloroquine and evaluated from fluorescence microscopy images. The relaxation of superhelicity was accompanied by 15-fold decrease in the length of nucleoid units (from approximately 50 kbp to approximately 3 kbp).     

Localization of plastid DNA replication on a nucleoid structure

Plastids contain multiple copies of the plastid genome that are arranged into discrete aggregates, termed nucleoids. Nucleoid molecular organization and its possible role in ensuring genome continuity have not yet been carefully explored. We examined the relationship between plastid DNA synthesis and nucleoid cytology in the unicellular chrysophyte Ochromonas danica, which is useful for such work because the genomes in each plastid are arranged in a single ring-shaped nucleoid. Immunocytochemical detection of thymidine analog incorporation into replicating DNA revealed that plastid DNA synthesis occurs at several sites along the ring nucleoid simultaneously, and that all plastids of a single cell display similar replication patterns. Plastid DNA replication was observed in G1, S, and G2 phase cells. Pulse-chase-pulse labelling with two different thymidine analogs revealed that new sites are activated as cells progress through the cell cycle while some old sites continue. The double labelling patterns suggest that the individual genomes are arranged consecutively, either singly or in clusters, along the nucleoid perimeter and that the selection of which genome replicates when is a matter of chance. These observations eliminate a number of alternative hypotheses concerning plastid DNA organization, and suggest how cells might maintain a constancy of plastid DNA amount and why plastid genome variants segregate so rapidly during mitosis.