Response of soil surface CO2 flux in a boreal forest to ecosystem warming

Soil surface carbon dioxide (CO₂) flux (R_S) was measured for 2 years at the Boreal Soil and Air Warming Experiment site near Thompson, MB, Canada. The experimental design was a complete random block design that consisted of four replicate blocks, with each block containing a 15 m × 15 m control and heated plot. Black spruce [Picea mariana (Mill.) BSP] was the overstory species and Epilobium angustifolium was the dominant understory. Soil temperature was maintained (～5 °C) above the control soil temperature using electric cables inside water filled polyethylene tubing for each heated plot. Air inside a 7.3‐m‐diameter chamber, centered in the soil warming plot, contained approximately nine black spruce trees was heated ～5 °C above control ambient air temperature allowing for the testing of soil‐only warming and soil+air warming. Soil surface CO₂ flux (R_S) was positively correlated (P < 0.0001) to soil temperature at 10 cm depth. Soil surface CO₂ flux (R_S) was 24% greater in the soil‐only warming than the control in 2004, but was only 11% greater in 2005, while R_S in the soil+air warming treatments was 31% less than the control in 2004 and 23% less in 2005. Live fine root mass (< 2 mm diameter) was less in the heated than control treatments in 2004 and statistically less (P < 0.01) in 2005. Similar root mass between the two heated treatments suggests that different heating methods (soil‐only vs. soil+air warming) can affect the rate of decomposition.     

The response of heterotrophic CO2 flux to soil warming

In a forest ecosystem at steady state, net carbon (C) assimilation by plants and C loss through soil and litter decomposition by heterotrophic organisms are balanced. However, a perturbation to the system, such as increased mean soil temperature, will lead to faster decay, enhancing CO₂ release from decomposers, and thus upsetting the balance. Recent in situ experiments have indicated that the stimulation of soil respiration following a step increase in annual average soil temperature declines over time. One possible explanation for this decline may be changes in substrate availability. This hypothesis is examined by using the ecosystem model G'DAY, which simulates C and nitrogen (N) dynamics in plants and soil. We applied the model to observations from a soil‐warming experiment in a Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) stand by simulating a step increase of soil temperature. The model provided a good qualitative reproduction of the observed reduction of heterotrophic respiration (R_h) under sustained warming. The simulations showed how the combined effects of faster turnover and reduced substrate availability lead to a transient increase of R_h. The simulated annual increase in R_h from soil was 60% in the first year after perturbation but decreased to 30% after a decade. One conclusion from the analysis of the simulations is that R_h can decrease even though the temperature response function for decomposition remains unchanged. G'DAY suggests that acclimation of R_h to soil warming is partly an effect of substrate depletion of labile C pools during the first decade of warming as a result of accelerated rates of mineralization. The response is attributed mainly to changing levels of C in pools with short time constants, reflecting the importance of high‐quality soil C fractions. Changes of the structure or physiology of the decomposer community were not invoked. Therefore, it becomes a question of definition whether the simulated dynamics of the declining response of CO₂ release to the warming should be named acclimation or seen as a natural part of the system dynamics.     

Soil CO2 efflux in a boreal pine forest under atmospheric CO2 enrichment and air warming

The response of forest soil CO₂ efflux to the elevation of two climatic factors, the atmospheric concentration of CO₂ (↑CO₂ of 700 μmol mol⁻¹) and air temperature (↑ T with average annual increase of 5°C), and their combination (↑CO₂+↑ T ) was investigated in a 4-year, full-factorial field experiment consisting of closed chambers built around 20-year-old Scots pines ( Pinus sylvestris L.) in the boreal zone of Finland. Mean soil CO₂ efflux in May–October increased with elevated CO₂ by 23–37%, with elevated temperature by 27–43%, and with the combined treatment by 35–59%. Temperature elevation was a significant factor in the combined 4-year efflux data, whereas the effect of elevated CO₂ was not as evident. Elevated temperature had the most pronounced impact early and late in the season, while the influence of elevated CO₂ alone was especially notable late in the season. Needle area was found to be a significant predictor of soil CO₂ efflux, particularly in August, a month of high root growth, thus supporting the assumption of a close link between whole-tree physiology and soil CO₂ emissions. The decrease in the temperature sensitivity of soil CO₂ efflux observed in the elevated temperature treatments in the second year nevertheless suggests the existence of soil response mechanisms that may be independent of the assimilating component of the forest ecosystem. In conclusion, elevated atmospheric CO₂ and air temperature consistently increased forest soil CO₂ efflux over the 4-year period, their combined effect being additive, with no apparent interaction.     

Vertical partitioning of CO2 production within a temperate forest soil

The major driving factors of soil CO₂ production – substrate supply, temperature, and water content – vary vertically within the soil profile, with the greatest temporal variations of these factors usually near the soil surface. Several studies have demonstrated that wetting and drying of the organic horizon contributes to temporal variation in summertime soil CO₂ efflux in forests, but this contribution is difficult to quantify. The objectives of this study were to partition CO₂ production vertically in a mixed hardwood stand of the Harvard Forest, Massachusetts, USA, and then to use that partitioning to evaluate how the relative contributions of CO₂ production by genetic soil horizon vary seasonally and interannually. We measured surface CO₂ efflux and vertical soil profiles of CO₂ concentration, temperature, water content, and soil physical characteristics. These data were applied to a model of effective diffusivity to estimate CO₂ flux at the top of each genetic soil horizon and the production within each horizon. A sensitivity analysis revealed sources of uncertainty when applying a diffusivity model to a rocky soil with large spatial heterogeneity, especially estimates of bulk density and volumetric water content and matching measurements of profiles and surface fluxes. We conservatively estimate that the O horizon contributed 40–48% of the total annual soil CO₂ efflux. Although the temperature sensitivity of CO₂ production varied across soil horizons, the partitioning of CO₂ production by horizon did not improve the overall prediction of surface CO₂ effluxes based on temperature functions. However, vertical partitioning revealed that water content covaried with CO₂ production only in the O horizon. Large interannual variations in estimates of O horizon CO₂ production indicate that this layer could be an important transient interannual source or sink of ecosystem C.     

Source components and interannual variability of soil CO2 efflux under experimental warming and clipping in a grassland ecosystem

Partitioning soil CO₂ efflux into autotrophic (R_A) and heterotrophic (R_H) components is crucial for understanding their differential responses to climate change. We conducted a long‐term experiment (2000–2005) to investigate effects of warming 2°C and yearly clipping on soil CO₂ efflux and its components (i.e. R_A and R_H) in a tallgrass prairie ecosystem. Interannual variability of these fluxes was also examined. Deep collars (70 cm) were inserted into soil to measure R_H. R_A was quantified as the difference between soil CO₂ efflux and R_H. Warming treatment significantly stimulated soil CO₂ efflux and its components (i.e. R_A and R_H) in most years. In contrast, yearly clipping significantly reduced soil CO₂ efflux only in the last 2 years, although it decreased R_H in every year of the study. Temperature sensitivity (i.e. apparent Q₁₀ values) of soil CO₂ efflux was slightly lower under warming (P>0.05) and reduced considerably by clipping (P<0.05) compared with that in the control. On average over the 4 years, R_H accounted for approximately 65% of soil CO₂ efflux with a range from 58% to 73% in the four treatments. Over seasons, the contribution of R_H to soil CO₂ efflux reached a maximum in winter (∼90%) and a minimum in summer (∼35%). Annual soil CO₂ efflux did not vary substantially among years as precipitation did. The interannual variability of soil CO₂ efflux may be mainly caused by precipitation distribution and summer severe drought. Our results suggest that the effects of warming and yearly clipping on soil CO₂ efflux and its components did not result in significant changes in R_H or R_A contribution, and rainfall timing may be more important in determining interannual variability of soil CO₂ efflux than the amount of annual precipitation.     

Soil CO2 efflux in a tropical forest in the central Amazon

This study investigated the spatial and temporal variation in soil carbon dioxide (CO₂) efflux and its relationship with soil temperature, soil moisture and rainfall in a forest near Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. The mean rate of efflux was 6.45±0.25 SE μmol CO₂ m^?2s^?1 at 25.6±0.22 SE°C (5 cm depth) ranging from 4.35 to 9.76 μmol CO₂ m^?2s^?1; diel changes in efflux were correlated with soil temperature (r²=0.60). However, the efflux response to the diel cycle in temperature was not always a clear exponential function. During period of low soil water content, temperature in deeper layers had a better relationship with CO₂ efflux than with the temperature nearer the soil surface. Soil water content may limit CO₂ production during the drying‐down period that appeared to be an important factor controlling the efflux rate (r²=0.39). On the other hand, during the rewetting period microbial activity may be the main controlling factor, which may quickly induce very high rates of efflux. The CO₂ flux chamber was adapted to mimic the effects of rainfall on soil CO₂ efflux and the results showed that efflux rates reduced 30% immediately after a rainfall event. Measurements of the CO₂ concentration gradient in the soil profile showed a buildup in the concentration of CO₂ after rain on the top soil. This higher CO₂ concentration developed shortly after rainfall when the soil pores in the upper layers were filled with water, which created a barrier for gas exchange between the soil and the atmosphere.     

CO2 flux from soil in pastures and forests in southwestern Amazonia

Stocks of carbon in Amazonian forest biomass and soils have received considerable research attention because of their potential as sources and sinks of atmospheric CO₂. Fluxes of CO₂ from soil to the atmosphere, on the other hand, have not been addressed comprehensively in regard to temporal and spatial variations and to land cover change, and have been measured directly only in a few locations in Amazonia. Considerable variation exists across the Amazon Basin in soil properties, climate, and management practices in forests and cattle pastures that might affect soil CO₂ fluxes. Here we report soil CO₂ fluxes from an area of rapid deforestation in the southwestern Amazonian state of Acre. Specifically we addressed (1) the seasonal variation of soil CO₂ fluxes, soil moisture, and soil temperature; (2) the effects of land cover (pastures, mature, and secondary forests) on these fluxes; (3) annual estimates of soil respiration; and (4) the relative contributions of grass‐derived and forest‐derived C as indicated by δ¹³CO₂. Fluxes were greatest during the wet season and declined during the dry season in all land covers. Soil respiration was significantly correlated with soil water‐filled pore space but not correlated with temperature. Annual fluxes were higher in pastures compared with mature and secondary forests, and some of the pastures also had higher soil C stocks. The δ¹³C of CO₂ respired in pasture soils showed that high respiration rates in pastures were derived almost entirely from grass root respiration and decomposition of grass residues. These results indicate that the pastures are very productive and that the larger flux of C cycling through pasture soils compared with forest soils is probably due to greater allocation of C belowground. Secondary forests had soil respiration rates similar to mature forests, and there was no correlation between soil respiration and either forest age or forest biomass. Hence, belowground allocation of C does not appear to be directly related to the stature of vegetation in this region. Variation in seasonal and annual rates of soil respiration of these forests and pastures is more indicative of flux of C through the soil rather than major net changes in ecosystem C stocks.     

Forest soil CO2 flux: uncovering the contribution and environmental responses of ectomycorrhizas

Forests play a critical role in the global carbon cycle, being considered an important and continuing carbon sink. However, the response of carbon sequestration in forests to global climate change remains a major uncertainty, with a particularly poor understanding of the origins and environmental responses of soil CO₂ efflux. For example, despite their large biomass, the contribution of ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungi to forest soil CO₂ efflux and responses to changes in environmental drivers has, to date, not been quantified in the field. Their activity is often simplistically included in the ‘autotrophic’ root respiration term. We set up a multiplexed continuous soil respiration measurement system in a young Lodgepole pine forest, using a mycorrhizal mesh collar design, to monitor the three main soil CO₂ efflux components: root, extraradical mycorrhizal hyphal, and soil heterotrophic respiration. Mycorrhizal hyphal respiration increased during the first month after collar insertion and thereafter remained remarkably stable. During autumn the soil CO₂ flux components could be divided into ∼60% soil heterotrophic, ∼25% EM hyphal, and ∼15% root fluxes. Thus the extraradical EM mycelium can contribute substantially more to soil CO₂ flux than do roots. While EM hyphal respiration responded strongly to reductions in soil moisture and appeared to be highly dependent on assimilate supply, it did not responded directly to changes in soil temperature. It was mainly the soil heterotrophic flux component that caused the commonly observed exponential relationship with temperature. Our results strongly suggest that accurate modelling of soil respiration, particularly in forest ecosystems, needs to explicitly consider the mycorrhizal mycelium and its dynamic response to specific environmental factors. Moreover, we propose that in forest ecosystems the mycorrhizal CO₂ flux component represents an overflow ‘CO₂ tap’ through which surplus plant carbon may be returned directly to the atmosphere, thus limiting expected carbon sequestration from trees under elevated CO₂.     

The turnover of carbon pools contributing to soil CO2 and soil respiration in a temperate forest exposed to elevated CO2 concentration

Soil carbon is returned to the atmosphere through the process of soil respiration, which represents one of the largest fluxes in the terrestrial C cycle. The effects of climate change on the components of soil respiration can affect the sink or source capacity of ecosystems for atmospheric carbon, but no current techniques can unambiguously separate soil respiration into its components. Long‐term free air CO₂ enrichment (FACE) experiments provide a unique opportunity to study soil C dynamics because the CO₂ used for fumigation has a distinct isotopic signature and serves as a continuous label at the ecosystem level. We used the ¹³C tracer at the Duke Forest FACE site to follow the disappearance of C fixed before fumigation began in 1996 (pretreatment C) from soil CO₂ and soil‐respired CO₂, as an index of belowground C dynamics during the first 8 years of the experiment. The decay of pretreatment C as detected in the isotopic composition of soil‐respired CO₂ and soil CO₂ at 15, 30, 70, and 200 cm soil depth was best described by a model having one to three exponential pools within the soil system. The majority of soil‐respired CO₂ (71%) originated in soil C pools with a turnover time of about 35 days. About 55%, 50%, and 68% of soil CO₂ at 15, 30, and 70 cm, respectively, originated in soil pools with turnover times of less than 1 year. The rest of soil CO₂ and soil‐respired CO₂ originated in soil pools that turn over at decadal time scales. Our results suggest that a large fraction of the C returned to the atmosphere through soil respiration results from dynamic soil C pools that cannot be easily detected in traditionally defined soil organic matter standing stocks. Fast oxidation of labile C substrates may prevent increases in soil C accumulation in forests exposed to elevated [CO₂] and may consequently result in shorter ecosystem C residence times.     

Seasonal patterns of soil CO2 efflux and soil air CO2 concentration in a Scots pine forest: comparison of two chamber techniques

A non‐vented non‐steady state flow‐through chamber and a non‐vented non‐steady state non‐flow‐through chamber technique were used to measure CO₂ efflux of a young Scots pine forest on a fertile till soil in southern Finland. Soil temperature, soil moisture and soil CO₂ concentration were measured concurrently with CO₂ efflux for two and a half successive years. The CO₂ efflux showed a seasonal pattern, effluxes ranging from low 0.0–0.1 g CO₂ m ^{? 2} h ^{? 1} in winter to peak values of 2.3 g CO₂ m ^{? 2} h ^{? 1} occurring in late June and in July. The daily average effluxes in July measured by flow through chambers were 1.23 and 0.98 g CO₂ m ^{? 2} h ^{? 1} in 1998 and 1999, respectively. The annual accumulated CO₂ efflux was 3117 and 3326 g CO₂ m ^{? 2} in 1998 and 1999, respectively. The spatial variation in CO₂ efflux was high (CV 0.18–0.45) and increased with increasing efflux. Soil air CO₂ concentration showed similar seasonal pattern the peak concentrations occurring in July–August. The CO₂ concentrations ranged from 580 to 780 µ mol mol ^{? 1} in the humus layer to 13 620–14 470 µ mol mol ^{? 1} in the C‐horizon. In winter the soil air CO₂ concentrations were lower, especially in deeper soil layers. Drought decreased CO₂ efflux and soil air CO₂ concentration. The in situ comparison on forest soil between the chamber methods showed the non‐flow‐through chamber to give ～～50% lower efflux values than that of the flow‐through chamber. When calibrated against known CO₂ efflux ranging from 0.4 to 0.8 g CO₂ m ^{? 2} h ^{? 1} generated with a diffusion box method developed by Widén and Lindroth [Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Suecia Silvestria, 2001], the flow‐through chamber gave equal effluxes at the lower end of the calibration range, but overestimated high effluxes by 20%. Non‐flow‐through chamber underestimated the CO₂ efflux by 30%.     

Responses of soil respiration to elevated CO2, air warming, and changing soil water availability in a model old-field grassland

Responses of soil respiration to atmospheric and climatic change will have profound impacts on ecosystem and global carbon (C) cycling in the future. This study was conducted to examine effects on soil respiration of the concurrent driving factors of elevated atmospheric CO₂ concentration, air warming, and changing precipitation in a constructed old‐field grassland in eastern Tennessee, USA. Model ecosystems of seven old‐field species were established in open‐top chambers and treated with factorial combinations of ambient or elevated (+300 ppm) CO₂ concentration, ambient or elevated (+3 °C) air temperature, and high or low soil moisture content. During the 19‐month experimental period from June 2003 to December 2004, higher CO₂ concentration and soil water availability significantly increased mean soil respiration by 35.8% and 15.7%, respectively. The effects of air warming on soil respiration varied seasonally from small reductions to significant increases to no response, and there was no significant main effect. In the wet side of elevated CO₂ chambers, air warming consistently caused increases in soil respiration, whereas in the other three combinations of CO₂ and water treatments, warming tended to decrease soil respiration over the growing season but increase it over the winter. There were no interactive effects on soil respiration among any two or three treatment factors irrespective of time period. Treatment‐induced changes in soil temperature and moisture together explained 49%, 44%, and 56% of the seasonal variations of soil respiration responses to elevated CO₂, air warming, and changing precipitation, respectively. Additional indirect effects of seasonal dynamics and responses of plant growth on C substrate supply were indicated. Given the importance of indirect effects of the forcing factors and plant community dynamics on soil temperature, moisture, and C substrate, soil respiration response to climatic warming should not be represented in models as a simple temperature response function, and a more mechanistic representation including vegetation dynamics and substrate supply is needed.     

Controls on microbial CO2 production: a comparison of surface and subsurface soil horizons

Although a significant amount of the organic C stored in soil resides in subsurface horizons, the dynamics of subsurface C stores are not well understood. The objective of this study was to determine if changes in soil moisture, temperature, and nutrient levels have similar effects on the mineralization of surface (0–25 cm) and subsurface (below 25 cm) C stores. Samples were collected from a 2 m deep unsaturated mollisol profile located near Santa Barbara, CA, USA. In a series of experiments, we measured the influence of nutrient additions (N and P), soil temperature (10–35°C), and soil water potential (?0.5 to ?10 MPa) on the microbial mineralization of native soil organic C. Surface and subsurface soils were slightly different with respect to the effects of water potential on microbial CO₂ production; C mineralization rates in surface soils were more affected by conditions of moderate drought than rates in subsurface soils. With respect to the effects of soil temperature and nutrient levels on C mineralization rates, subsurface horizons were significantly more sensitive to increases in temperature or nutrient availability than surface horizons. The mean Q₁₀ value for C mineralization rates was 3.0 in surface horizons and 3.9 in subsurface horizons. The addition of either N or P had negligible effects on microbial CO₂ production in surface soil layers; in the subsurface horizons, the addition of either N or P increased CO₂ production by up to 450% relative to the control. The results of these experiments suggest that alterations of the soil environment may have different effects on CO₂ production through the profile and that the mineralization of subsurface C stores may be particularly susceptible to increases in temperature or nutrient inputs to soil.     

Precipitation pulses and soil CO2 flux in a Sonoran Desert ecosystem

Precipitation is a major driver of biological processes in arid and semiarid ecosystems. Soil biogeochemical processes in these water‐limited systems are closely linked to episodic rainfall events, and the relationship between microbial activity and the amount and timing of rainfall has implications for the whole‐system carbon (C) balance. Here, the influences of storm size and time between events on pulses of soil respiration were explored in an upper Sonoran Desert ecosystem. Immediately following experimental rewetting in the field, CO₂ efflux increased up to 30‐fold, but generally returned to background levels within 48 h. CO₂ production integrated over 48 h ranged from 2.5 to 19.3 g C m⁻² and was greater beneath shrubs than in interplant spaces. When water was applied on sequential days, postwetting losses of CO₂ were only half a large as initial fluxes, and the size of the second pulse increased with time between consecutive events. Soil respiration was more closely linked to the organic matter content of surface soils than to rainfall amount. Beneath shrubs, rates increased nonlinearly with storm size, reaching an asymptote at approximately 0.5 cm simulated storms. This nonlinear relationship stems from (1) resource limitation of microbial activity that is manifest at small time scales, and (2) greatly reduced process rates in deeper soil strata. Thus, beyond some threshold in storm size, increasing the duration or depth of soil moisture has little consequence for short‐term losses of CO₂. In addition, laboratory rewetting across a broad range in soil water content suggest that microbial activity and CO₂ efflux following rainfall may be further modified by the routing and redistribution of water along hillslopes. Finally, analysis of long‐term precipitation data suggests that half the monsoon storms in this system are sufficient to induce soil heterotrophic activity and C losses, but are not large enough to elicit autotrophic activity and C accrual by desert shrubs.     

Effects of an induced drought on soil carbon dioxide (CO2) efflux and soil CO2 production in an Eastern Amazonian rainforest, Brazil

In the next few decades, climate of the Amazon basin is expected to change, as a result of deforestation and rising temperatures, which may lead to feedback mechanisms in carbon (C) cycling that are presently unknown. Here, we report how a throughfall exclusion (TFE) experiment affected soil carbon dioxide (CO₂) production in a deeply weathered sandy Oxisol of Caxiuanã (Eastern Amazon). Over the course of 2 years, we measured soil CO₂ efflux and soil CO₂ concentrations, soil temperature and moisture in pits down to 3 m depth. Over a period of 2 years, TFE reduced on average soil CO₂ efflux from 4.3±0.1 μmol CO₂ m⁻² s⁻¹ (control) to 3.2±0.1 μmol CO₂ m⁻² s⁻¹ (TFE). The contribution of the subsoil (below 0.5 m depth) to the total soil CO₂ production was higher in the TFE plot (28%) compared with the control plot (17%), and it did not differ between years. We distinguished three phases of drying after the TFE was started. The first phase was characterized by a translocation of water uptake (and accompanying root activity) to deeper layers and not enough water stress to affect microbial activity and/or total root respiration. During the second phase a reduction in total soil CO₂ efflux in the TFE plot was related to a reduction of soil and litter decomposers activity. The third phase of drying, characterized by a continuing decrease in soil CO₂ production was dominated by a water stress‐induced decrease in total root respiration. Our results contrast to results of a drought experiment on clay Oxisols, which may be related to differences in soil water retention characteristics and depth of rooting zone. These results show that large differences exist in drought sensitivity among Amazonian forest ecosystems, which primarily seem to be affected by the combined effects of texture (affecting water holding capacity) and depth of rooting zone.     

Wood CO2 efflux in a primary tropical rain forest

The balance between photosynthesis and plant respiration in tropical forests may substantially affect the global carbon cycle. Woody tissue CO₂ efflux is a major component of total plant respiration, but estimates of ecosystem‐scale rates are uncertain because of poor sampling in the upper canopy and across landscapes. To overcome these problems, we used a portable scaffolding tower to measure woody tissue CO₂ efflux from ground level to the canopy top across a range of sites of varying slope and soil phosphorus content in a primary tropical rain forest in Costa Rica. The objectives of this study were to: (1) determine whether to use surface area, volume, or biomass for modeling and extrapolating wood CO₂ efflux, (2) determine if wood CO₂ efflux varied seasonally, (3) identify if wood CO₂ efflux varied by functional group, height in canopy, soil fertility, or slope, and (4) extrapolate wood CO₂ efflux to the forest. CO₂ efflux from small diameter woody tissue (<10 cm) was related to surface area, while CO₂ efflux from stems >10 cm was related to both surface area and volume. Wood CO₂ efflux showed no evidence of seasonality over 2 years. CO₂ efflux per unit wood surface area at 25° (F_A) was highest for the N‐fixing dominant tree species Pentaclethra macroloba, followed by other tree species, lianas, then palms. Small diameter F_A increased steeply with increasing height, and large diameter F_A increased with diameter. Soil phosphorus and slope had slight, but complex effects on F_A. Wood CO₂ efflux per unit ground area was 1.34±0.36 μmol m^?2 s^?1, or 508±135 g C m^?2 yr^?1. Small diameter wood, only 15% of total woody biomass, accounted for 70% of total woody tissue CO₂ efflux from the forest; while lianas, only 3% of total woody biomass, contributed one‐fourth of the total wood CO₂ efflux.     

Six years of in situ CO2 enrichment evoke changes in soil structure and soil biota of nutrient-poor grassland

Nutrient‐poor grassland on a silty clay loam overlying calcareous debris was exposed to elevated CO₂ for six growing seasons. The CO₂ exchange and productivity were persistently increased throughout the experiment, suggesting increases in soil C inputs. At the same time, elevated CO₂ lead to increased soil moisture due to reduced evapotransporation. Measurements related to soil microflora did not indicate increased soil C fluxes under elevated CO₂. Microbial biomass, soil basal respiration, and the metabolic quotient for CO₂ (qCO₂) were not altered significantly. PLFA analysis indicated no significant shift in the ratio of fungi to bacteria. 0.5 m KCl extractable organic C and N, indicators of changed DOC and DON concentrations, also remained unaltered. Microbial grazer populations (protozoa, bacterivorous and fungivorous nematodes, acari and collembola) and root feeding nematodes were not affected by elevated CO₂. However, total nematode numbers averaged slightly lower under elevated CO₂ (?16%, ns) and nematode mass was significantly reduced (?43%, P = 0.06). This reduction reflected a reduction in large‐diameter nematodes classified as omnivorous and predacious. Elevated CO₂ resulted in a shift towards smaller aggregate sizes at both micro‐ and macro‐aggregate scales; this was caused by higher soil moisture under elevated CO₂. Reduced aggregate sizes result in reduced pore neck diameters. Locomotion of large‐diameter nematodes depends on the presence of large enough pores; the reduction in aggregate sizes under elevated CO₂ may therefore account for the decrease in large nematodes. These animals are relatively high up the soil food web; this decline could therefore trigger top‐down effects on the soil food web. The CO₂ enrichment also affected the nitrogen cycle. The N stocks in living plants and surface litter increased at elevated CO₂, but N in soil organic matter and microbes remained unaltered. Nitrogen mineralization increased markedly, but microbial N did not differ between CO₂ treatments, indicating that net N immobilization rates were unaltered. In summary, this study did not provide evidence that soils and soil microbial communities are affected by increased soil C inputs under elevated CO₂. On the contrary, available data (¹³C tracer data, minirhizotron observations, root ingrowth cores) suggests that soil C inputs did not increase substantially. However, we provide first evidence that elevated CO₂ can reduce soil aggregation at the scale from µ m to mm scale, and that this can affect soil microfaunal populations.     

The response of soil CO2 flux to changes in atmospheric CO2, nitrogen supply and plant diversity

We measured soil CO₂ flux over 19 sampling periods that spanned two growing seasons in a grassland Free Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment (FACE) experiment that factorially manipulated three major anthropogenic global changes: atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂) concentration, nitrogen (N) supply, and plant species richness. On average, over two growing seasons, elevated atmospheric CO₂ and N fertilization increased soil CO₂ flux by 0.57 µmol m^?2 s^?1 (13% increase) and 0.37 µmol m^?2 s^?1 (8% increase) above average control soil CO₂ flux, respectively. Decreases in planted diversity from 16 to 9, 4 and 1 species decreased soil CO₂ flux by 0.23, 0.41 and 1.09 µmol m^?2 s^?1 (5%, 8% and 21% decreases), respectively. There were no statistically significant pairwise interactions among the three treatments. During 19 sampling periods that spanned two growing seasons, elevated atmospheric CO₂ increased soil CO₂ flux most when soil moisture was low and soils were warm. Effects on soil CO₂ flux due to fertilization with N and decreases in diversity were greatest at the times of the year when soils were warm, although there were no significant correlations between these effects and soil moisture. Of the treatments, only the N and diversity treatments were correlated over time; neither were correlated with the CO₂ effect. Models of soil CO₂ flux will need to incorporate ecosystem CO₂ and N availability, as well as ecosystem plant diversity, and incorporate different environmental factors when determining the magnitude of the CO₂, N and diversity effects on soil CO₂ flux.