植物G蛋白偶联受体

G蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)是数量最大的一类膜蛋白受体,存在于大多数真核生物中,参与多种不同的信号转导途径。动物中已经发现1000多个GPCR,但植物中只发现了少数候选GPCR,包括拟南芥GCR1、GCR2、AtRGS1、豌豆PsGPCR和其他一些七次跨膜蛋白质。本文介绍了近几年来植物GPCR的研究进展,包括已发现的植物候选GPCR、与其相互作用的蛋白质及GPCR信号转导途径等。     

G蛋白偶联受体转激活酪氨酸激酶受体机制

G蛋白偶联受体(G-protien coupled receptors,GPCRs)和酪氨酸激酶受体(receptor tyrosine kinases,RTKs)是体内两类重要的受体家族,介导着绝大多数信号事件。GPCRs能够"绑架"RTKs进行信号转导,即GPCRs能够在没有外加RTKs配体的情况下激活RTKs,这种现象称为转激活。作为转激活的核心过程,GPCR调控RTK磷酸化主要采取RTK配体依赖模式和非RTK配体依赖模式。不同的G蛋白亚型、酪氨酸磷酸激酶、酪氨酸磷酸酶(protein-tyrosine phosphatases,PTPs)以及活性氧自由基(reactiveoxygen species,ROS)均在此过程中具有重要作用。GPCR和RTK还能形成信号复合体(signaling complex)从而实现蛋白质之间的动态相互作用。对转激活的研究为GPCR靶点药物开发提供了新思路。     

禾谷镰刀菌cAMP受体类GPCR生物信息学分析

禾谷镰刀菌(Fusarium graminearum)是引起小麦赤霉病的主要致病菌。G蛋白偶联受体(G protein coupled receptors,GPCRs)是一类重要的细胞表面受体,其介导的cAMP信号通路可能参与了禾谷镰刀菌的致病和毒素合成,因此分析cAMP受体类型的GPCRs蛋白的结构及其理化性质对了解GPCRs的功能及其与赤霉病致病的关系具有重要意义。本研究运用生物信息学方法,对禾谷镰刀菌全基因组序列中cAMP类GPCR基因进行了生物信息学分析。发现禾谷镰刀菌中存在5个典型的cAMP受体类型GPCRs:FgcAR1、FgcAR2、FgcAR3、FgcAR4和FgcAR5,均含有7个跨膜结构域,并定位于细胞膜上。除FgcAR1外,其余为疏水性蛋白。蛋白质二级结构分析表明,均含有大量α螺旋,比例在60%左右,FgcAR4和FgcAR5没有β转角,FgcAR1、FgcAR2和FgcAR3也只有较少比例的β转角。这些GPCRs中含有较多的Ser和Thr磷酸化位点。遗传分析表明,禾谷镰刀菌cAMP受体类型的GPCR蛋白与假禾谷镰刀菌及F.langsethiae同源性最高,亲缘关系最近。本研究明确了禾谷镰刀菌中cAMP类GPCR蛋白的理化性质、定位、二级结构、磷酸化位点及进化关系,为了解小麦赤霉病发病机制及以GPCRs为靶标的新型杀菌剂研发奠定了基础。     

棕榈酰化修饰对G蛋白偶联受体功能的调节作用

G蛋白偶联受体(G-protein-coupled receptors,GPCRs)作为跨膜蛋白,其结构和功能同时受相互作用的蛋白质和脂质分子调控.S-棕榈酰化(S-palmitoylation)能够影响GPCRs与信号蛋白及膜脂分子的相互作用,在GPCRs相关的多项生理进程中发挥重要调节作用.棕榈酸与GPCRs的半胱氨酸间形成不稳定的硫酯键,其修饰动力学过程受棕榈酰转移酶(protein acly transferases,PATs)与硫酯酶(thioesterases)之间的可逆性双重调控,与受体活性及生理状态密切相关.棕榈酰化修饰多发生在GPCRs的C末端,通过棕榈酸侧链插入到质膜内侧而形成第4和/或第5个胞内环,从而影响GPCRs的构象,促进其正确折叠与成熟,并对GPCRs胞内转运、分选、下游信号转导、失敏、内化、寡聚化等活动产生影响.此外,棕榈酰化还与磷酸化、泛素化及亚硝基化等多种翻译后修饰机制相互作用,共同参与调节GPCRs的功能.GPCRs的棕榈酰化修饰酶学机制以及GPCRs蛋白复合体棕榈酰化修饰胞内动力学过程将是未来的研究热点.     

β-Arrestins参与GPCRs信号通路的分子机制

β-抑制蛋白(β arrestins)是一类在β肾上腺素受体激酶（βARK)提纯过程中发现的重要支架蛋白和信号调控因子;G蛋白偶联受体（GPCRs）为7次跨膜受体,在细胞信号转导中发挥关键作用,是很多临床药物的作用靶点. β-抑制蛋白作为衔接蛋白,调控GPCRs相关的信号通路,介导GPCRs的脱敏、内化、循环、复敏等生理过程,影响多种疾病的进程. 本文总结了β-抑制蛋白参与GPCRs信号通路的研究进展,侧重阐明了其中的分子机制,以期为开发新一代调控GPCRs功能活性的相关药物提供理论基础.     

G蛋白偶联受体失敏的分子机制

G蛋白偶联受体（GPCRs)受到激动剂持续刺激对易发生失敏。受体内化是GPCRs失敏重要分子机制。GPCRs在G蛋白产受体激酶（GRKs)、第二信使调节激酶等作用下发生磷酸化,磷酸化的GPCRs与抑制蛋白（arrestins)结合后导致受体与G蛋白失偶联,并通过胞吞由细胞膜表面向膜内转移,从而因GPCRs的内化而表现为失敏。     

G蛋白偶联受体的结构与功能

G蛋白偶联受体(Gprotein-coupled receptor,GPCR)是具有7个跨膜螺旋的蛋白质受体,根据其序列的相似性以及与配基的结合情况,共分为5个亚家族,是人体内最大的蛋白质家族,也是重要的药物靶标。二聚体或寡聚体的形成,以及G蛋白偶联受体多元素参与的信号网络传递模式的研究,打破了传统的配基→G蛋白偶联受体→G蛋白→效应器的这种单一的线性信号传递模式,它的结构与功能的研究对于新药的开发、研制以及推动医药领域的发展起着举足轻重的作用。     

G蛋白偶联受体的双聚化及其对受体介导信号转导的影响

近年来发现一些G蛋白偶联受体（GPCR）能在细胞膜上形成同源或异源双聚体,并证实受体的双聚化为一些有重要生理功能的GPCR在细胞膜上的表达和信号转导的启动所必需,进一步研究表明,一些GPCR的双聚化不仅可以改变受体与配体结合的特异性和亲和力,而且影响GPCR介导的信号转导的调控,这些结果提示,GPCR之间以及GPCR与其它蛋白在细胞膜上的相互作用是调控GPCR转导信号的一个新途径。     

G蛋白偶联受体激酶的调控

G蛋白偶联受体激酶(G protein-coupled receptor kinase,GRK)特异地使活化的G蛋白偶联受体(G protein-coupled receptor,GPCR)发生磷酸化及脱敏化,从而终止后者介导的信号转导通路。研究表明,GRK的功能被高度调控,并具有下行调节GPCR的能力。调控GRK功能的机制包括两个层次：(1)多种途径调控激酶的亚细胞定位及活性,包括GPCR介导、G蛋白偶联、磷脂作用、Ca^2 结合蛋白调控、蛋白激酶C活化、MAPK反馈抑制、小窝蛋白抑制等;(2)调控GRK表达水平,主要体现在其与某些疾病的联系。     

G蛋白偶联受体与G蛋白相互作用的最新研究进展

传统观念认为,在激动剂作用下,G蛋白偶联受体(GPCRs)能够激活G蛋白的α亚基,从而使Gα亚基与Gβγ亚基分离,被激活的Gα亚基通过信号转导进一步参与细胞的生理过程。但是,最新研究发现GPCRs和G蛋白存在多种偶联关系,GPCRs不仅能够激活Gα亚基,还可以与Gβγ亚基相互靠近,甚至会使G蛋白亚基构象发生重排而不分离,这对于疾病发病机制的研究及新的药物靶点的发现具有重要意义。就GPCRs与G蛋白之间的相互作用以及最新研究技术作一简要综述。     

与癌症相关的G 蛋白偶联受体及通路的研究进展

G蛋白偶联受体(G protein-coupled receptors,GPCRs)是一类重要的细胞膜表面跨膜蛋白受体超家族,具有7个跨膜螺旋结构。GPCRs的细胞内信号由G蛋白介导,可将激素、神经递质、药物、趋化因子等多种物理和化学的细胞外刺激穿过细胞膜转导到细胞内不同的效应分子,激活相应的信号级联系统进而影响恶性肿瘤的生长迁移过程。虽然目前药物市场上有很多治疗癌症的小分子药物属于G蛋白受体相关药物,但所作用的靶点集中于少数特定G蛋白偶联受体。因此,新的具有成药性的G蛋白偶联受体的开发具有很大的研究价值和市场潜力。本文主要以在癌症发生、发展中起重要作用的溶血磷脂酸(LPA),G蛋白偶联受体30(GPR30)、内皮素A受体(ETAR)等不同G蛋白偶联受体为分类依据,综述其与相关的信号通路在癌症进程中的作用,并对相应的小分子药物的临床应用和研究进展进行展望。     

Signaling through G protein coupled receptors

Heterotrimeric G proteins (Gα, Gβ/Gγ subunits) constitute one of the most important components of cell signaling cascade. G Protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) perceive many extracellular signals and transduce them to heterotrimeric G proteins, which further transduce these signals intracellular to appropriate downstream effectors and thereby play an important role in various signaling pathways. GPCRs exist as a superfamily of integral membrane protein receptors that contain seven transmembrane α-helical regions, which bind to a wide range of ligands. Upon activation by a ligand, the GPCR undergoes a conformational change and then activate the G proteins by promoting the exchange of GDP/GTP associated with the Gα subunit. This leads to the dissociation of Gβ/Gγ dimer from Gα. Both these moieties then become free to act upon their downstream effectors and thereby initiate unique intracellular signaling responses. After the signal propagation, the GTP of Gα-GTP is hydrolyzed to GDP and Gα becomes inactive (Gα-GDP), which leads to its re-association with the Gβ/Gγ dimer to form the inactive heterotrimeric complex. The GPCR can also transduce the signal through G protein independent pathway. GPCRs also regulate cell cycle progression. Till to date thousands of GPCRs are known from animal kingdom with little homology among them, but only single GPCR has been identified in plant system. The Arabidopsis GPCR was reported to be cell cycle regulated and also involved in ABA and in stress signaling. Here I have described a general mechanism of signal transduction through GPCR/G proteins, structure of GPCRs, family of GPCRs and plant GPCR and its role.Key words: heterotrimeric G proteins, GPCRs, seven-transmembrane receptors, signal transduction, stress signaling     

Sensing and transduction of nutritional and chemical signals in filamentous fungi: Impact on cell development and secondary metabolites biosynthesis

Filamentous fungi respond to hundreds of nutritional, chemical and environmental signals that affect expression of primary metabolism and biosynthesis of secondary metabolites. These signals are sensed at the membrane level by G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). GPCRs contain usually seven transmembrane domains, an external amino terminal fragment that interacts with the ligand, and an internal carboxy terminal end interacting with the intracellular G protein. There is a great variety of GPCRs in filamentous fungi involved in sensing of sugars, amino acids, cellulose, cell-wall components, sex pheromones, oxylipins, calcium ions and other ligands. Mechanisms of signal transduction at the membrane level by GPCRs are discussed, including the internalization and compartmentalisation of these sensor proteins. We have identified and analysed the GPCRs in the genome of Penicillium chrysogenum and compared them with GPCRs of several other filamentous fungi. We have found 66 GPCRs classified into 14 classes, depending on the ligand recognized by these proteins, including most previously proposed classes of GPCRs. We have found 66 putative GPCRs, representatives of twelve of the fourteen previously proposed classes of GPCRs, depending on the ligand recognized by these proteins. A staggering fortytwo putative members of the new GPCR class XIV, the so-called Pth11 sensors of cellulosic material as reported for Neurospora crassa and some other fungi, were identified. Several GPCRs sensing sex pheromones, known in yeast and in several fungi, were also identified in P. chrysogenum, confirming the recent unravelling of the hidden sexual capacity of this species. Other sensing mechanisms do not involve GPCRs, including the two-component systems (HKRR), the HOG signalling system and the PalH mediated pH transduction sensor. GPCR sensor proteins transmit their signals by interacting with intracellular heterotrimeric G proteins, that are well known in several fungi, including P. chrysogenum. These G proteins are inactive in the GDP containing heterotrimeric state, and become active by nucleotide exchange, allowing the separation of the heterotrimeric protein in active Gα and Gβγ dimer subunits. The conversion of GTP in GDP is mediated by the endogenous GTPase activity of the G proteins. Downstream of the ligand interaction, the activated Gα protein and also the Gβ/Gγ dimer, transduce the signals through at least three different cascades: adenylate cyclase/cAMP, MAPK kinase, and phospholipase C mediated pathways.     

Structural biology of G protein‐coupled receptor signaling complexes

G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute the largest family of cell surface receptors that mediate numerous cell signaling pathways, and are targets of more than one‐third of clinical drugs. Thanks to the advancement of novel structural biology technologies, high‐resolution structures of GPCRs in complex with their signaling transducers, including G‐protein and arrestin, have been determined. These 3D complex structures have significantly improved our understanding of the molecular mechanism of GPCR signaling and provided a structural basis for signaling‐biased drug discovery targeting GPCRs. Here we summarize structural studies of GPCR signaling complexes with G protein and arrestin using rhodopsin as a model system, and highlight the key features of GPCR conformational states in biased signaling including the sequence motifs of receptor TM6 that determine selective coupling of G proteins, and the phosphorylation codes of GPCRs for arrestin recruitment. We envision the future of GPCR structural biology not only to solve more high‐resolution complex structures but also to show stepwise GPCR signaling complex assembly and disassembly and dynamic process of GPCR signal transduction.     

Novel Allosteric Modulators of G Protein-coupled Receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are allosteric proteins, because their signal transduction relies on interactions between topographically distinct, yet conformationally linked, domains. Much of the focus on GPCR allostery in the new millennium, however, has been on modes of targeting GPCR allosteric sites with chemical probes due to the potential for novel therapeutics. It is now apparent that some GPCRs possess more than one targetable allosteric site, in addition to a growing list of putative endogenous modulators. Advances in structural biology are also shedding new insights into mechanisms of allostery, although the complexities of candidate allosteric drugs necessitate rigorous biological characterization.     

Activation of rhodopsin: new insights from structural and biochemical studies

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are involved in a vast variety of cellular signal transduction processes from visual, taste and odor perceptions to sensing the levels of many hormones and neurotransmitters. As a result of agonist-induced conformation changes, GPCRs become activated and catalyze nucleotide exchange within the G proteins, thus detecting and amplifying the signal. GPCRs share a common heptahelical transmembrane structure as well as many conserved key residues and regions. Rhodopsins are prototypical GPCRs that detect photons in retinal photoreceptor cells and trigger a phototransduction cascade that culminates in neuronal signaling. Biophysical and biochemical studies of rhodopsin activation, and the recent crystal structure determination of bovine rhodopsin, have provided new information that enables a more complete mechanism of vertebrate rhodopsin activation to be proposed. In many aspects, rhodopsin might provide a structural and functional template for other members of the GPCR family.     

A rapid fluorogenic GPCR–β‐arrestin interaction assay

Detection of protein–protein interactions involved in signal transduction in live cells and organisms has a variety of important applications. We report a fluorogenic assay for G protein‐coupled receptor (GPCR)–β‐arrestin interaction that is genetically encoded, generalizes to multiple GPCRs, and features high signal‐to‐noise because fluorescence is absent until its components interact upon GPCR activation. Fluorescence after protease‐activated receptor‐1 activation developed in minutes and required specific serine–threonine residues in the receptor carboxyl tail, consistent with a classical G protein‐coupled receptor kinase dependent β‐arrestin recruitment mechanism. This assay provides a useful complement to other in vivo assays of GPCR activation.     

Statistical sequence analyses of G-protein-coupled receptors: structural and functional characteristics viewed with periodicities of entropy, hydrophobicity, and volume

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play a crucial role in signal transduction and receive a wide variety of ligands. GPCRs are a major target in drug design, as nearly 50% of all contemporary medicines act on GPCRs. GPCRs are membrane proteins possessing a common structural feature, seven transmembrane helices. In order to design an effective drug to act on a GPCR, knowledge of the three-dimensional (3D) structure of the target GPCR is indispensable. However, as GPCRs are membrane bound, their 3D structures are difficult to obtain. Thus we conducted statistical sequence analyses to find information about 3D structure and ligand binding using the receptors' primary sequences. We present statistical sequence analyses of 270 human GPCRs with regard to entropy (Shannon entropy in sequence alignment), hydrophobicity and volume, which are associated with the alpha-helical periodicity of the accessibility to the surrounding lipid. We found periodicity such that the phase changes once in the middle of each transmembrane region, both in the entropy plot and in the hydrophobicity plot. The phase shift in the entropy plot reflects the variety of ligands and the generality of the mechanism of signal transduction. The two periodic regions in the hydrophobicity plot indicate the regions facing the hydrophobic lipid chain and the polar phospholipid headgroup. We also found a simple periodicity in the plot of volume deviation, which suggests conservation of the stable structural packing among the transmembrane helices.     

Relevance of rhodopsin studies for GPCR activation

Rhodopsin, the dim-light photoreceptor present in the rod cells of the retina, is both a retinal-binding protein and a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). Due to this conjunction, it benefits from an arsenal of spectroscopy techniques that can be used for its characterization, while being a model system for the important family of Class A (also referred to as “rhodopsin-like”) GPCRs. For instance, rhodopsin has been a crucial player in the field of GPCR structural biology. Until 2007, it was the only GPCR for which a high-resolution crystal structure was available, so all structure–activity analyses on GPCRs, from structure-based drug discovery to studies of structural changes upon activation, were based on rhodopsin. At present, about a third of currently available GPCR structures are still from rhodopsin. In this review, I show some examples of how these structures can still be used to gain insight into general aspects of GPCR activation. First, the analysis of the third intracellular loop in rhodopsin structures allows us to gain an understanding of the structural and dynamic properties of this region, which is absent (due to protein engineering or poor electron density) in most of the currently available GPCR structures. Second, a detailed analysis of the structure of the transmembrane domains in inactive, intermediate and active rhodopsin structures allows us to detect early conformational changes in the process of ligand-induced GPCR activation. Finally, the analysis of a conserved ligand-activated transmission switch in the transmembrane bundle of GPCRs in the context of the rhodopsin activation cycle, allows us to suggest that the structures of many of the currently available agonist-bound GPCRs may correspond to intermediate active states. While the focus in GPCR structural biology is inevitably moving away from rhodopsin, in other aspects rhodopsin is still at the forefront. For instance, the first studies of the structural basis of disease mutants in GPCRs, or the most detailed analysis of cellular GPCR signal transduction networks using a systems biology approach, have been carried out in rhodopsin. Finally, due again to its unique properties among GPCRs, rhodopsin will likely play an important role in the application of X-ray free electron laser crystallography to time-resolved structural biology in membrane proteins. Rhodopsin, thus, still remains relevant as a model system to study the molecular mechanisms of GPCR activation. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Retinal Proteins—You can teach an old dog new tricks.