Long-term clinical outcome of immediate reconstruction after mastectomy

Immediate reconstruction of a breast removed for treatment of carcinoma can be accomplished without altering the cancer-ablative surgical procedure. The theoretical possibility that reconstruction might compromise the cure rate has tempered enthusiasm for this approach. To test this issue, the relapse-free survival of 101 patients who underwent breast reconstruction in the immediate postmastectomy period was compared with that of 377 patients with breast cancer who underwent mastectomy without immediate reconstruction. This comparison was accomplished using multivariable statistical techniques to correct for baseline inequalities between the patient groups. After adjustment for the relevant prognostic factors, no significant difference remained between the two groups. We conclude that immediate reconstruction has no discernible adverse influence on the natural history of surgically treated breast carcinoma.     

An improved technique for immediate retropectoral reconstruction after subcutaneous mastectomy

Subcutaneous mastectomy is becoming an operation of choice in certain cases of premalignant and other breast pathology. We describe a technique for simultaneous subcutaneous mastectomy and retropectoral implantation of a silicone prosthesis. Gentle blunt prepectoral, retromammary dissection is performed through an axillary incision as far inferiorly as the inframammary fold, where a fibrous bridge between the anterior surface of the pectoralis major muscle and the skin prevents dissection any lower. Through the same incision, the retropectoral space is dissected to about 5 cm below the inframammary fold. A second incision is made in the inframammary fold to join the retromammary plane of the first dissection. The gland is then dissected subcutaneously and removed through the inframammary incision. A silicone implant is introduced retropectorally through the axillary incision, thus avoiding splitting the pectoralis major. Satisfactory results have been obtained in 23 bilateral and 14 unilateral cases; it is important that the dissection be performed carefully in order to prevent the implant from riding up too high in its musculoaponeurotic sling.     

A 6-year experience with immediate reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer

A 6-year retrospective review is presented of 185 patients who underwent immediate reconstruction of the breast at the same operation as mastectomy for carcinoma. The patients were treated at two institutions under similar protocols of patient selection, surgical technique, and postoperative care. A detailed evaluation is presented from both the oncologic and surgical points of view. The data support the conclusion that immediate reconstruction of the breast does not alter survival or cancer recurrence rates and does not interfere with the treatment of primary or secondary disease. A low incidence of significant surgical complications is also detailed. Combined with previous reports answering psychological concerns about this mode and timing of reconstruction, this review offers significant reassurance about the overall safety of immediate reconstruction. The authors therefore recommend immediate reconstruction of the breast as a safe treatment option for the woman facing mastectomy.     

Breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty: treatment by skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction

Breast conservation has been associated with poor cosmetic outcome when used to treat breast cancer in patients who have undergone prior augmentation mammaplasty. Radiation therapy of the augmented breast can increase breast fibrosis and capsular contraction. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction are examined as an alternative treatment.Six patients with prior breast augmentation were treated for breast cancer by skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. One patient underwent a contralateral prophylactic skin-sparing mastectomy. Silicone gel implants had been placed in the submuscular location in five patients and in the subglandular position in one patient a mean of 10.2 years (range, 6 to 20 years) before breast cancer diagnosis. The mean patient age was 41.3 years (range, 33 to 56 years). Four independent judges reviewed postoperative photographs to grade the aesthetic results in comparison with the opposite native or reconstructed breast.The American Joint Committee on Cancer staging was stage 0 in one patient, stage I for four patients, and stage II for one patient. Five of the six patients presented with a palpable breast mass. Latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction was performed in four patients (bilaterally in one) and a transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap was used in two patients. Three patients were treated by skin-sparing mastectomy with preservation of the breast implant (two patients with latissimus flaps, and one patient with a TRAM flap). The tumor location necessitated the removal of implants in two patients (one patient with a latissimus flap and one with a TRAM. A saline implant was placed under the latissimus flap after gel implant removal. The patient who underwent bilateral skin-sparing mastectomies desired explantation and placement of saline implants. No remedial surgery was performed on the opposite breast to achieve symmetry. Complications occurred in two patients at the latissimus dorsi donor site (seroma in one patient, and seroma and infection in one). Five patients underwent complete nipple reconstructions. The mean duration of follow-up was 33.6 months (range, 15.5 to 70.3 months), and there were no recurrences of breast cancer. The aesthetic results were judged to be good to excellent in all cases.Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction can be used in patients with prior breast augmentation, with good to excellent cosmetic results. Depending on the tumor and implant location, the implant may be preserved without compromising local control.     

Skin-sparing mastectomy and radiotherapy: an update

Despite the lack of randomised controlled trials and paucity of the published data, the current evidence suggests that the post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) does not represent a contraindication to skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) in the multidisciplinary setting. Although PMRT is associated with a higher incidence of complications, a satisfactory cosmetic outcome can be achieved in most patients. Radiation has a deleterious effect on autologous flap reconstruction that relies on fat for volume replacement such as the deep inferior epi-gastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction and this method of reconstruction should be delayed until RT is completed. Until better methods of RT delivery are developed to minimise complications, women at high risk of requiring PMRT, can be safely offered SSM and IBR with a sub-pectoral saline-filled tissue expander and this can be replaced with a permanent prosthesis or converted into an autologous flap reconstruction after the completion of RT. Any capsule formation can be surgically treated at this stage. This new concept, known as immediate-delayed reconstruction, can avoid the cosmetic and RT delivery problems that can occur after IBR.Furthermore, prior RT does not represent a contra-indication to SSM and IBR, however it increases the incidence of complications.     

Technical aspects and outcome after prophylactic mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction in 30 consecutive high-risk patients

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a consecutive series of patients operated on with prophylactic mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implants, focusing on preoperative assessment, technical aspects of surgical outcome, and number of postoperative complications on a short-term basis. Thirty consecutive healthy women with an increased risk of breast cancer who were therefore operated on with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction are reported. A multidisciplinary approach with a geneticist, general surgeon, plastic surgeon, specially trained nurse, psychologist, gynecologist, and oncologist was used preoperatively, with thorough information provided to the patient about the surgery. Eleven patients had gene mutations, and in all patients, the geneticist had performed a risk assessment. The mean age of the patients was 41 years. The technique was modified over time with smaller or special incisions and tailor-made adjustments for each patient. Great care was taken to remove all breast tissue. The tops of the breast nipples were regrafted for cosmetic purposes, and the base was sent for histopathologic examination. In most cases, permanent expander prostheses with detachable valves were used. The areolas were tattooed, if they were not left in place. No patient had occult cancer or carcinoma in situ. Four postoperative complications occurred, including two hematomas, one infection (treated with antibiotics), and one pneumothorax in a patient with severe asthma. All reconstructions were fulfilled. The mean hospital stay was 5.7 days. The time from mastectomy to the final tattooing of the areolas was 260 days. All patients returned to normal daily activities after fulfilled reconstruction.