DnaK Chaperone-dependent Disaggregation by Caseinolytic Peptidase B (ClpB) Mutants Reveals Functional Overlap in the N-terminal Domain and Nucleotide-binding Domain-1 Pore Tyrosine

Protein disaggregation in Escherichia coli is carried out by ClpB, an AAA(+) (ATPases associated with various cellular activities) molecular chaperone, together with the DnaK chaperone system. Conformational changes in ClpB driven by ATP binding and hydrolysis promote substrate binding, unfolding, and translocation. Conserved pore tyrosines in both nucleotide-binding domain-1 (NBD-1) and -2 (NBD-2), which reside in flexible loops extending into the central pore of the ClpB hexamer, bind substrates. When the NBD-1 pore loop tyrosine is substituted with alanine (Y251A), ClpB can collaborate with the DnaK system in disaggregation, although activity is reduced. The N-domain has also been implicated in substrate binding, and like the NBD-1 pore loop tyrosine, it is not essential for disaggregation activity. To further probe the function and interplay of the ClpB N-domain and the NBD-1 pore loop, we made a double mutant with an N-domain deletion and a Y251A substitution. This ClpB double mutant is inactive in substrate disaggregation with the DnaK system, although each single mutant alone can function with DnaK. Our data suggest that this loss in activity is primarily due to a decrease in substrate engagement by ClpB prior to substrate unfolding and translocation and indicate an overlapping function for the N-domain and NBD-1 pore tyrosine. Furthermore, the functional overlap seen in the presence of the DnaK system is not observed in the absence of DnaK. For innate ClpB unfolding activity, the NBD-1 pore tyrosine is required, and the presence of the N-domain is insufficient to overcome the defect of the ClpB Y251A mutant.     

The ClpS adaptor mediates staged delivery of N-end rule substrates to the AAA+ ClpAP protease

The ClpS adaptor delivers N-end rule substrates to ClpAP, an energy-dependent AAA+ protease, for degradation. How ClpS binds specific N-end residues is known in atomic detail and clarified here, but the delivery mechanism is poorly understood. We show that substrate binding is enhanced when ClpS binds hexameric ClpA. Reciprocally, N-end rule substrates increase ClpS affinity for ClpA(6). Enhanced binding requires the N-end residue and a peptide bond of the substrate, as well as multiple aspects of ClpS, including a side chain that contacts the substrate α-amino group and the flexible N-terminal extension (NTE). Finally, enhancement also needs the N domain and AAA+ rings of ClpA, connected by a long linker. The NTE can be engaged by the ClpA translocation pore, but ClpS resists unfolding/degradation. We propose a staged-delivery model that illustrates how intimate contacts between the substrate, adaptor, and protease reprogram specificity and coordinate handoff from the adaptor to the protease.     

A Single ClpS Monomer Is Sufficient to Direct the Activity of the ClpA Hexamer

ClpS is an adaptor protein that interacts with ClpA and promotes degradation of proteins with N-end rule degradation motifs (N-degrons) by ClpAP while blocking degradation of substrates with other motifs. Although monomeric ClpS forms a 1:1 complex with an isolated N-domain of ClpA, only one molecule of ClpS binds with high affinity to ClpA hexamers (ClpA₆). One or two additional molecules per hexamer bind with lower affinity. Tightly bound ClpS dissociates slowly from ClpA₆ with a t_½ of ∼3 min at 37 °C. Maximum activation of degradation of the N-end rule substrate, LR-GFP_Venus, occurs with a single ClpS bound per ClpA₆; one ClpS is also sufficient to inhibit degradation of proteins without N-degrons. ClpS competitively inhibits degradation of unfolded substrates that interact with ClpA N-domains and is a non-competitive inhibitor with substrates that depend on internal binding sites in ClpA. ClpS inhibition of substrate binding is dependent on the order of addition. When added first, ClpS blocks binding of both high and low affinity substrates; however, when substrates first form committed complexes with ClpA₆, ClpS cannot displace them or block their degradation by ClpP. We propose that the first molecule of ClpS binds to the N-domain and to an additional functional binding site, sterically blocking binding of non-N-end rule substrates as well as additional ClpS molecules to ClpA₆. Limiting ClpS-mediated substrate delivery to one per ClpA₆ avoids congestion at the axial channel and allows facile transfer of proteins to the unfolding and translocation apparatus.     

ClpS is the recognition component for Escherichia coli substrates of the N-end rule degradation pathway

The N-end rule degradation pathway states that the half-life of a protein is determined by the nature of its N-terminal residue. In Escherichia coli the adaptor protein ClpS directly interacts with destabilizing N-terminal residues and transfers them to the ClpA/ClpP proteolytic complex for degradation. The crucial role of ClpS in N-end rule degradation is currently under debate, since ClpA/ClpP was shown to process selected N-terminal degrons harbouring destabilizing residues in the absence of ClpS. Here, we investigated the contribution of ClpS to N-end rule degradation by two approaches. First, we performed a systematic mutagenesis of selected N-degron model substrates, demonstrating that ClpS but not ClpA specifically senses the nature of N-terminal residues. Second, we identified two natural N-end rule substrates of E. coli : Dps and PATase (YgjG). The in vivo degradation of both proteins strictly relied on ClpS, thereby establishing the function of ClpS as the essential discriminator of the E. coli N-end rule pathway.     

Both ATPase Domains of ClpA Are Critical for Processing of Stable Protein Structures

ClpA is a ring-shaped hexameric chaperone that binds to both ends of the protease ClpP and catalyzes the ATP-dependent unfolding and translocation of substrate proteins through its central pore into the ClpP cylinder. Here we study the relevance of ATP hydrolysis in the two ATPase domains of ClpA. We designed ClpA Walker B variants lacking ATPase activity in the first (D1) or the second ATPase domain (D2) without impairing ATP binding. We found that the two ATPase domains of ClpA operate independently even in the presence of the protease ClpP or the adaptor protein ClpS. Notably, ATP hydrolysis in the first ATPase module is sufficient to process a small, single domain protein of low stability. Substrate proteins of moderate local stability were efficiently processed when D1 was inactivated. However, ATP hydrolysis in both domains was required for efficiently processing substrates of high local stability. Furthermore, we provide evidence for the ClpS-dependent directional translocation of N-end rule substrates from the N to C terminus and propose a mechanistic model for substrate handover from the adaptor protein to the chaperone.     

ClpS1 Is a Conserved Substrate Selector for the Chloroplast Clp Protease System in Arabidopsis

Whereas the plastid caseinolytic peptidase (Clp) P protease system is essential for plant development, substrates and substrate selection mechanisms are unknown. Bacterial ClpS is involved in N-degron substrate selection and delivery to the ClpAP protease. Through phylogenetic analysis, we show that all angiosperms contain ClpS1 and some species also contain ClpS1-like protein(s). In silico analysis suggests that ClpS1 is the functional homolog of bacterial ClpS. We show that Arabidopsis thaliana ClpS1 interacts with plastid ClpC1,2 chaperones. The Arabidopsis ClpS1 null mutant (clps1) lacks a visible phenotype, and no genetic interactions with ClpC/D chaperone or ClpPR core mutants were observed. However, clps1, but not clpc1-1, has increased sensitivity to the translational elongation inhibitor chloramphenicol suggesting a link between translational capacity and ClpS1. Moreover, ClpS1 was upregulated in clpc1-1, and quantitative proteomics of clps1, clpc1, and clps1 clpc1 showed specific molecular phenotypes attributed to loss of ClpC1 or ClpS1. In particular, clps1 showed alteration of the tetrapyrrole pathway. Affinity purification identified eight candidate ClpS1 substrates, including plastid DNA repair proteins and Glu tRNA reductase, which is a control point for tetrapyrrole synthesis. ClpS1 interaction with five substrates strictly depended on two conserved ClpS1 residues involved in N-degron recognition. ClpS1 function, substrates, and substrate recognition mechanisms are discussed.     

An intrinsic degradation tag on the ClpA C-terminus regulates the balance of ClpAP complexes with different substrate specificity

ATP-dependent protein degradation in bacteria is carried out by barrel-shaped proteases architecturally related to the proteasome. In Escherichia coli, ClpP interacts with two alternative ATPases, ClpA or ClpX, to form active protease complexes. ClpAP and ClpXP show different but overlapping substrate specificities. ClpXP is considered the primary recipient of ssrA-tagged substrates while ClpAP in complex with ClpS processes N-end rule substrates. Notably, in its free form, but not in complex with ClpS, ClpAP also degrades ssrA-tagged substrates and its own chaperone component, ClpA. To reveal the mechanism of ClpAP-mediated ClpA degradation, termed autodegradation, and its possible role in regulating ClpAP levels, we dissected ClpA to show that the flexible C-terminus of the second AAA module serves as the degradation signal. We demonstrate that ClpA becomes largely resistant to autodegradation in the absence of its C-terminus and, conversely, transfer of the last 11 residues of ClpA to the C-terminus of green fluorescent protein (GFP) renders GFP a substrate of ClpAP. This autodegradation tag bears similarity to the ssrA-tag in its degradation behavior, displaying similar catalytic turnover rates when coupled to GFP but a twofold lower apparent affinity constant compared to ssrA-tagged GFP. We show that, in analogy to the prevention of ssrA-mediated recognition, the adaptor ClpS inhibits autodegradation by a specificity switch as opposed to direct masking of the degradation signal. Our results demonstrate that in the presence of ssrA-tagged substrates, ClpA autodegradation will be competitively reduced. This simple mechanism allows for dynamic reallocation of free ClpAP versus ClpAPS in response to the presence of ssrA-tagged substrates.     

Crystallographic investigation of peptide binding sites in the N-domain of the ClpA chaperone

Escherichia coli ClpA, an Hsp100/Clp chaperone and an integral component of the ATP-dependent ClpAP protease, participates in the dissolution and degradation of regulatory proteins and protein aggregates. ClpA consists of three functional domains: an N-terminal domain and two ATPase domains, D1 and D2. The N-domain is attached to D1 by a mobile linker and is made up of two tightly bound, identically folded alpha-helical bundles related by a pseudo 2-fold symmetry. Between the halves of the pseudo-dimer is a large flexible acidic loop that becomes better ordered upon binding of the small adaptor protein, ClpS. We have identified a number of structural features in the N-domain, including a Zn(++) binding motif, several interfaces for binding to ClpS, and a prominent hydrophobic surface area that binds peptides in different configurations. These structural motifs may contribute to binding of protein or peptide substrates with weak affinity and broad specificity. Kinetic studies comparing wild-type ClpA to a mutant ClpA with its N-domain deleted show that the N-domains contribute to the binding of a non-specific protein substrate but not of a folded substrate with the specific SsrA recognition tag. A functional model is proposed in which the N-domains in ClpA function as tentacles to weakly hold on to proteins thereby enhancing local substrate concentration.     

Loops in the central channel of ClpA chaperone mediate protein binding, unfolding, and translocation

The cylindrical Hsp100 chaperone ClpA mediates ATP-dependent unfolding of substrate proteins bearing "tag" sequences, such as the 11-residue ssrA sequence appended to proteins translationally stalled at ribosomes. Unfolding is coupled to translocation through a central channel into the associating protease, ClpP. To explore the topology and mechanism of ClpA action, we carried out chemical crosslinking and functional studies. Whereas a tag from RepA protein crosslinked proximally to the flexible N domains, the ssrA sequence in GFP-ssrA crosslinked distally in the channel to a segment of the distal ATPase domain (D2). Single substitutions placed in this D2 loop, and also in two apparently cooperating proximal (D1) loops, abolished binding of ssrA substrates and unfolded proteins lacking tags and blocked unfolding of GFP-RepA. Additionally, a substitution adjoining the D2 loop allowed binding of ssrA proteins but impaired their translocation. This loop, as in homologous nucleic-acid translocases, may bind substrates proximally and, coupled with ATP hydrolysis, translocate them distally, exerting mechanical force that mediates unfolding.     

ClpS, a substrate modulator of the ClpAP machine

In the bacterial cytosol, ATP-dependent protein degradation is performed by several different chaperone-protease pairs, including ClpAP. The mechanism by which these machines specifically recognize substrates remains unclear. Here, we report the identification of a ClpA cofactor from Escherichia coli, ClpS, which directly influences the ClpAP machine by binding to the N-terminal domain of the chaperone ClpA. The degradation of ClpAP substrates, both SsrA-tagged proteins and ClpA itself, is specifically inhibited by ClpS. In contrast, ClpS enhanced ClpA recognition of two heat-aggregated proteins in vitro and, consequently, the ClpAP-mediated disaggregation and degradation of these substrates. We conclude that ClpS modifies ClpA substrate specificity, potentially redirecting degradation by ClpAP toward aggregated proteins.     

A camel passes through the eye of a needle: protein unfolding activity of Clp ATPases

Clp ATPases are protein machines involved in protein degradation and disaggregation. The common structural feature of Clp ATPases is the formation of ring-shaped oligomers. Recent work has shown that the function of all Clp ATPases is based on an energy-dependent threading of substrates through the narrow pore at the centre of the ring. This review gives an outline of known mechanistic principles of threading machines that unfold protein substrates either before their degradation (ClpA, ClpX, HslU) or during their reactivation from aggregates (ClpB). The place of Clp ATPases within a broad AAA+ superfamily of ATPases associated with various cellular activities suggests that similar mechanisms can be used by other protein machines to induce conformational rearrangements in a wide variety of substrates.     

Conserved residues in the N-domain of the AAA+ chaperone ClpA regulate substrate recognition and unfolding

Protein degradation in the cytosol of Escherichia coli is carried out by a variety of different proteolytic machines, including ClpAP. The ClpA component is a hexameric AAA+ (ATPase associated with various cellular activities) chaperone that utilizes the energy of ATP to control substrate recognition and unfolding. The precise role of the N-domains of ClpA in this process, however, remains elusive. Here, we have analysed the role of five highly conserved basic residues in the N-domain of ClpA by monitoring the binding, unfolding and degradation of several different substrates, including short unstructured peptides, tagged and untagged proteins. Interestingly, mutation of three of these basic residues within the N-domain of ClpA (H94, R86 and R100) did not alter substrate degradation. In contrast mutation of two conserved arginine residues (R90 and R131), flanking a putative peptide-binding groove within the N-domain of ClpA, specifically compromised the ability of ClpA to unfold and degrade selected substrates but did not prevent substrate recognition, ClpS-mediated substrate delivery or ClpP binding. In contrast, a highly conserved tyrosine residue lining the central pore of the ClpA hexamer was essential for the degradation of all substrate types analysed, including both folded and unstructured proteins. Taken together, these data suggest that ClpA utilizes two structural elements, one in the N-domain and the other in the pore of the hexamer, both of which are required for efficient unfolding of some protein substrates.     

Crystal structure of the heterodimeric complex of the adaptor,ClpS, with the N-domain of the AAA+ chaperone,ClpA

Substrate selectivity and proteolytic activity for the E. coli ATP-dependent protease, ClpAP, is modulated by an adaptor protein, ClpS. ClpS binds to ClpA, the regulatory component of the ClpAP complex. We report the crystal structure of ClpS in complex with the isolated N-terminal domain of ClpA in two different crystal forms at 2.3- and 3.3-A resolution. The ClpS structure forms an alpha/beta-sandwich and is topologically analogous to the C-terminal domain of the ribosomal protein L7/L12. ClpS contacts two surfaces on the N-terminal domain in both crystal forms; the more extensive interface was shown to be favored in solution by protease protection experiments. The N-terminal 20 residues of ClpS are not visible in the crystal structures; the removal of the first 17 residues produces ClpSDeltaN, which binds to the ClpA N-domain but no longer inhibits ClpA activity. A zinc binding site involving two His and one Glu residue was identified crystallographically in the N-terminal domain of ClpA. In a model of ClpS bound to hexameric ClpA, ClpS is oriented with its N terminus directed toward the distal surface of ClpA, suggesting that the N-terminal region of ClpS may affect productive substrate interactions at the apical surface or substrate entry into the ClpA translocation channel.     

Bioinformatic analysis of ClpS,a protein module involved in prokaryotic and eukaryotic protein degradation

ClpS is a small protein, usually encoded immediately upstream of ClpA in the genomes of proteobacteria. Recent results show that it is a molecular adaptor for substrate recognition by ClpA in Escherichia coli. We analyzed ClpS by bioinformatic methods and found that ClpS homologs are also found in organisms that lack ClpA, such as actinobacteria, cyanobacteria, and plant chloroplasts. Furthermore, ClpS is homologous to a domain in the eukaryotic E3 ubiquitin ligase, N-recognin. This domain has previously been described as responsible for the recognition of type 2 N-end rule substrates. Despite very low levels of sequence similarity to proteins of known structure, there appears to be substantial structural similarity between ClpS and the C-terminal domain of ribosomal protein L7/12 (1CTF).     

Structural analysis of the adaptor protein ClpS in complex with the N-terminal domain of ClpA

In Escherichia coli, protein degradation is performed by several proteolytic machines, including ClpAP. Generally, the substrate specificity of these machines is determined by chaperone components, such as ClpA. In some cases, however, the specificity is modified by adaptor proteins, such as ClpS. Here we report the 2.5 A resolution crystal structure of ClpS in complex with the N-terminal domain of ClpA. Using mutagenesis, we demonstrate that two contact residues (Glu79 and Lys 84) are essential not only for ClpAS complex formation but also for ClpAPS-mediated substrate degradation. The corresponding residues are absent in the chaperone ClpB, providing a structural rationale for the unique specificity shown by ClpS despite the high overall similarity between ClpA and ClpB. To determine the location of ClpS within the ClpA hexamer, we modeled the N-terminal domain of ClpA onto a structurally defined, homologous AAA+ protein. From this model, we proposed a molecular mechanism to explain the ClpS-mediated switch in ClpA substrate specificity.     

Structural determinants stabilizing the axial channel of ClpP for substrate translocation

Acyldepsipeptides (ADEPs) antibiotics bind to Escherichia coli ClpP mimicking the interactions that the IGL/F loops in ClpA or ClpX ATPases establish with the hydrophobic pockets surrounding the axial pore of the tetradecamer that the protease forms. ADEP binding induces opening of the gates blocking the axial channel of ClpP and allowing protein substrates to be translocated and hydrolysed in the degradation chamber. To identify the structural determinants stabilizing the open conformation of the axial channel for efficient substrate translocation, we constructed ClpP variants with amino acid substitutions in the N‐terminal region that forms the axial gates. We found that adoption of a β‐hairpin loop by this region and the integrity of the hydrophobic cluster at the base of this loop are necessary elements for the axial gate to efficiently translocate protein substrates. Analysis of ClpP variants from Bacillus subtilis suggested that the identified structural requirements of the axial channel for efficient translocation are conserved between Gram‐positive and Gram‐negative bacteria. These findings provide mechanistic insights into the activation of ClpP by ADEPs as well as the gating mechanism of the protease in the context of the ClpAP and ClpXP complexes.     

The N-terminal substrate-binding domain of ClpA unfoldase is highly mobile and extends axially from the distal surface of ClpAP protease

ClpAP is a barrel-like complex consisting of hexameric rings of the ClpA ATPase stacked on the double heptameric ring of ClpP peptidase. ClpA has two AAA+ domains (Dl and D2) and a 153-residue N-domain. Substrate proteins bind to the distal surface of ClpA and are unfolded and translocated axially into ClpP. To gain insight into the functional architecture of ClpA in the ATPgammaS state, we have determined its structure at 12A resolution by cryo-electron microscopy. The resulting model has two tiers, corresponding to rings of Dl and D2 domains: oddly, there is no sign of the N-domains in the density map. However, they were detected as faint diffuse density distal to the Dl tier in a difference image between wild-type ClpAP and a mutant lacking the N-domain. This region is also accentuated in a variance map of ClpAP and in a difference imaging experiment with ClpAP complexed with ClpS, a 12kDa protein that binds to the N-domain. These observations demonstrate that the N-domains are highly mobile. From molecular modeling, we identify their median position and estimate that they undergo fluctuations of at least 30A. We discuss the implications of these observations for the role of N-domains in substrate binding: either they effect an initial transient binding, relaying substrate to a second site on the Dl tier where unfolding ensues, or they may serve as an entropic brush to clear the latter site of non-specifically bound ligands or substrates bound in non-productive complexes.     

The flexible attachment of the N-domains to the ClpA ring body allows their use on demand

ClpA is an Hsp100 chaperone that uses the chemical energy of ATP to remodel various protein substrates to prepare them for degradation. It comprises two AAA+ modules and the N-domain, which is attached N-terminally to the first AAA+ module through a linker. On the basis of cryo-electron microscopic and X-ray crystallographic data it has been suggested that the linker confers mobility to the N-domain. In order to define the role of the N-domain in ClpAP-dependent substrate degradation we have generated a ΔN variant at the protein level by introducing a protease cleavage site. The ClpA molecule generated in this way lacks the N-domain and the associated linker but is impaired only slightly in the processing of substrates that are degraded independently of ClpS. In fact, it shows increased catalytic efficiency in the degradation of ssrA-tagged GFP compared to ClpAwt. The role of the linker attaching the N-domain to the bulk of the molecule was probed by characterizing variants with different lengths of the linker. The degradation efficiency of a ClpS-dependent N-end rule substrate, FRliGFP, is reduced for linkers that are shorter or longer than natural linkers but remains the same for the variant where the linker is replaced by an engineered sequence of equivalent length. These results suggest that the flexible attachment of the N-domains to ClpA allows their recruitment to the pore on demand for certain substrates, while allowing them to move out of the way for substrates binding directly to the pore.     

The ClpP double ring tetradecameric protease exhibits plastic ring-ring interactions, and the N termini of its subunits form flexible loops that are essential for ClpXP and ClpAP complex formation

ClpP is a conserved serine-protease with two heptameric rings that enclose a large chamber containing the protease active sites. Each ClpP subunit can be divided into a handle region, which mediates ring-ring interactions, and a head domain. ClpP associates with the hexameric ATPases ClpX and ClpA, which can unfold and translocate substrate proteins through the ClpP axial pores into the protease lumen for degradation. We have determined the x-ray structure of Streptococcus pneumoniae ClpP(A153P) at 2.5 A resolution. The structure revealed two novel features of ClpP which are essential for ClpXP and ClpAP functional activities. First, the Ala --> Pro mutation disrupts the handle region, resulting in an altered ring-ring dimerization interface, which, in conjunction with biochemical data, demonstrates the unusual plasticity of this region. Second, the structure shows the existence of a flexible N-terminal loop in each ClpP subunit. The loops line the axial pores in the ClpP tetradecamer and then protrude from the protease apical surface. The sequence of the N-terminal loop is highly conserved in ClpP across all kingdoms of life. These loops are essential determinants for complex formation between ClpP and ClpX/ClpA. Mutation of several amino acid residues in this loop or the truncation of the loop impairs ClpXP and ClpAP complex formation and prevents the coupling between ClpX/ClpA and ClpP activities.     

Cytoplasmic degradation of ssrA-tagged proteins

Degradation of ssrA-tagged proteins is a central feature of protein-quality control in all bacteria. In Escherichia coli, the ATP-dependent ClpXP and ClpAP proteases are thought to participate in this process, but their relative contributions to degradation of ssrA-tagged proteins in vivo have been uncertain because two adaptor proteins, ClpS and SspB, can modulate proteolysis of these substrates. Here, intracellular levels of these protease components and adaptors were determined during exponential growth and as cells entered early stationary phase. Levels of ClpA and ClpP increased about threefold during this transition, whereas ClpX, ClpS and SspB levels remained nearly constant. Using GFP-ssrA expressed from the chromosome as a degradation reporter, the effects of altered concentrations of different protease components or adaptor proteins were explored. Both ClpXP and ClpAP degraded GFP-ssrA in the cell, demonstrating that wild-type levels of SspB and ClpS do not inhibit ClpAP completely. Upon entry into stationary phase, increased levels of ClpAP resulted in increased degradation of ssrA-tagged substrates. As measured by maximum turnover rates, ClpXP degradation of GFP-ssrA in vivo was significantly more efficient than in vitro. Surprisingly, ClpX-dependent ClpP-independent degradation of GFP-ssrA was also observed. Thus, unfolding of this substrate by ClpX appears to enhance intracellular degradation by other proteases.