ClpP: a structurally dynamic protease regulated by AAA+ proteins

Proteolysis is an important process for many aspects of bacterial physiology. Clp proteases carry out a large proportion of protein degradation in bacteria. These enzymes assemble in complexes that combine the protease ClpP and the unfoldase, ClpA or ClpX. ClpP oligomerizes as two stacked heptameric rings enclosing a central chamber containing the proteolytic sites. ClpX and ClpA assemble into hexameric rings that bind both axial surfaces of the ClpP tetradecamer forming a barrel-like complex. ClpP requires association with ClpA or ClpX to unfold and thread protein substrates through the axial pore into the inner chamber where degradation occurs. A gating mechanism regulated by the ATPase exists at the entry of the ClpP axial pore and involves the N-terminal regions of the ClpP protomers. These gating motifs are located at the axial regions of the tetradecamer but in most crystal structures they are not visible. We also lack structural information about the ClpAP or ClpXP complexes. Therefore, the structural details of how the axial gate in ClpP is regulated by the ATPases are unknown. Here, we review our current understanding of the conformational changes that ClpA or ClpX induce in ClpP to open the axial gate and increase substrate accessibility into the degradation chamber. Most of this knowledge comes from the recent crystal structures of ClpP in complex with acyldepsipeptides (ADEP) antibiotics. These small molecules are providing new insights into the gating mechanism of this protease because they imitate the interaction of ClpA/ClpX with ClpP and activate its protease activity.     

The ClpP double ring tetradecameric protease exhibits plastic ring-ring interactions, and the N termini of its subunits form flexible loops that are essential for ClpXP and ClpAP complex formation

ClpP is a conserved serine-protease with two heptameric rings that enclose a large chamber containing the protease active sites. Each ClpP subunit can be divided into a handle region, which mediates ring-ring interactions, and a head domain. ClpP associates with the hexameric ATPases ClpX and ClpA, which can unfold and translocate substrate proteins through the ClpP axial pores into the protease lumen for degradation. We have determined the x-ray structure of Streptococcus pneumoniae ClpP(A153P) at 2.5 A resolution. The structure revealed two novel features of ClpP which are essential for ClpXP and ClpAP functional activities. First, the Ala --> Pro mutation disrupts the handle region, resulting in an altered ring-ring dimerization interface, which, in conjunction with biochemical data, demonstrates the unusual plasticity of this region. Second, the structure shows the existence of a flexible N-terminal loop in each ClpP subunit. The loops line the axial pores in the ClpP tetradecamer and then protrude from the protease apical surface. The sequence of the N-terminal loop is highly conserved in ClpP across all kingdoms of life. These loops are essential determinants for complex formation between ClpP and ClpX/ClpA. Mutation of several amino acid residues in this loop or the truncation of the loop impairs ClpXP and ClpAP complex formation and prevents the coupling between ClpX/ClpA and ClpP activities.     

Control of Substrate Gating and Translocation into ClpP by Channel Residues and ClpX Binding

ClpP is a self-compartmentalized protease, which has very limited degradation activity unless it associates with ClpX to form ClpXP or with ClpA to form ClpAP. Here, we show that ClpX binding stimulates ClpP cleavage of peptides larger than a few amino acids and enhances ClpP active-site modification. Stimulation requires ATP binding but not hydrolysis by ClpX. The magnitude of this enhancement correlates with increasing molecular weight of the molecule entering ClpP. Amino-acid substitutions in the channel loop or helix A of ClpP enhance entry of larger substrates into the free enzyme, eliminate ClpX binding in some cases, and are not further stimulated by ClpX binding in other instances. These results support a model in which the channel residues of free ClpP exclude efficient entry of all but the smallest peptides into the degradation chamber, with ClpX binding serving to relieve these inhibitory interactions. Specific ClpP channel variants also prevent ClpXP translocation of certain amino-acid sequences, suggesting that the wild-type channel plays an important role in facilitating broad translocation specificity. In combination with previous studies, our results indicate that collaboration between ClpP and its partner ATPases opens a gate that functions to exclude larger substrates from isolated ClpP.     

Assembly pathway of an AAA+ protein: tracking ClpA and ClpAP complex formation in real time

The ClpAP chaperone-protease complex is active as a cylindrically shaped oligomeric complex built of the proteolytic ClpP double ring as the core of the complex and two ClpA hexamers associating with the ends of the core cylinder. The ClpA chaperone belongs to the larger family of AAA+ ATPases and is responsible for preparing protein substrates for degradation by ClpP. Here, we study in real time using fluorescence and light scattering stopped-flow methods the complete assembly pathway of this bacterial chaperone-protease complex consisting of ATP-induced ClpA hexamer formation and the subsequent association of ClpA hexamers with the ClpP core cylinder. We provide evidence that ClpA assembles into hexamers via a tetrameric intermediate and that hexamerization coincides with the appearance of ATPase activity. While ATP-induced oligomerization of ClpA is a prerequisite for binding of ClpA to ClpP, the kinetics of ClpA hexamer formation are not influenced by the presence of ClpP. Models for ClpA hexamerization and ClpA-ClpP association are presented along with rate parameters obtained from numerical fitting procedures. The hexamerization kinetics show that the tetrameric intermediate transiently accumulates, forming rapidly at early time points and then decaying at a slower rate to generate the hexamer. The association of assembled ClpA hexamers with the ClpP core cylinder displays cooperativity, supporting the coexistence of interchanging ClpP conformations with different affinities for ClpA.     

Concurrent chaperone and protease activities of ClpAP and the requirement for the N-terminal ClpA ATP binding site for chaperone activity.

ClpA, a member of the Clp/Hsp100 family of ATPases, is both an ATP-dependent molecular chaperone and the regulatory component of ClpAP protease. We demonstrate that chaperone and protease activities occur concurrently in ClpAP complexes during a single round of RepA binding to ClpAP and ATP-dependent release. This result was substantiated with a ClpA mutant, ClpA(K220V), carrying an amino acid substitution in the N-terminal ATP binding site. ClpA(K220V) is unable to activate RepA, but the presence of ClpP or chemically inactivated ClpP restores its ability to activate RepA. The presence of ClpP simultaneously facilitates degradation of RepA. ClpP must remain bound to ClpA(K220V) for these effects, indicating that both chaperone and proteolytic activities of the mutant complex occur concurrently. ClpA(K220V) itself is able to form stable complexes with RepA in the presence of a poorly hydrolyzed ATP analog, adenosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate), and to release RepA upon exchange of adenosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate) with ATP. However, the released RepA is inactive in DNA binding, indicating that the N-terminal ATP binding site is essential for the chaperone activity of ClpA. Taken together, these results suggest that substrates bound to the complex of the proteolytic and ATPase components can be partitioned between release/reactivation and translocation/degradation.     

ClpA and ClpX ATPases bind simultaneously to opposite ends of ClpP peptidase to form active hybrid complexes

The Escherichia coli ATP-dependent ClpAP and ClpXP proteases are composed of a single proteolytic component, ClpP, complexed with either of the two related chaperones, ClpA or ClpX. ClpXP and ClpAP complexes interact with different specific substrates and catalyze ATP-dependent protein unfolding and degradation. In vitro in the presence of ATP or ATPgammaS, ClpA and ClpX form homomeric rings of six subunits, which bind to one or both ends of the double heptameric rings of ClpP. We have observed that, when equimolar amounts of ClpA and ClpX hexamers are added to ClpP in vitro in the presence of ATP or ATPgammaS, hybrid complexes in which ClpX and ClpA are bound to opposite ends of the same ClpP are readily formed. The distribution of homomeric and heteromeric complexes was consistent with random binding of ClpA and ClpX to the ends of ClpP. Direct demonstration of the functionality of the heteromeric complexes was obtained by electron microscopy, which allowed us to visualize substrate translocation into proteolytically inactive ClpP chambers. Starting with hybrid complexes to which protein substrates specific to ClpX or ClpA were bound, translocation of both types of substrates was shown to occur without significant redistribution of ClpA or ClpX. The stoichiometric ratios of the ClpA, ClpX, and ClpP oligomeric complexes in vivo are consistent with the predominance of heteromeric complexes in growing cells. Thus, ClpXAP is a bifunctional protease whose two ends can independently target different classes of substrates.     

Large nucleotide-dependent movement of the N-terminal domain of the ClpX chaperone

The ClpXP ATPase-protease complex is a major component of the protein quality control machinery in the cell. A ClpX subunit consists of an N-terminal zinc binding domain (ZBD) and a C-terminal AAA+ domain. ClpX oligomerizes into a hexamer with the AAA+ domains forming the base of the hexamer and the ZBDs extending out of the base. Here, we report that ClpX switches between a capture and a feeding conformation. ZBDs in ClpX undergo large nucleotide-dependent block movement towards ClpP and into the AAA+ ring. This motion is modulated by the ClpX cofactor, SspB. Evidence for this movement was initially obtained by the surprising observation that an N-terminal extension on ClpX is clipped by bound ClpP in functional ClpXP complexes. Protease-protection, crosslinking, and light scattering experiments further support these findings.     

The structural basis for the activation and peptide recognition of bacterial ClpP

ClpP and its ATPase compartment, ClpX or ClpA, remove misfolded proteins in cells and are of utmost importance in protein quality control. The ring hexamers of ClpA or ClpX recognize, unfold, and translocate target substrates into the degradation chamber of the double-ring tetradecamer of ClpP. The overall reaction scheme catalyzed by ClpXP or ClpAP has been proposed; however, the molecular mechanisms associated with substrate recognition and degradation have not yet been clarified in detail. To investigate these mechanisms, we determined the crystal structures of ClpP from Helicobacter pylori in complex with product peptides bound to the active site as well as in the apo state. In the complex structure, the peptides are zipped with two antiparallel strands of ClpP and point to the adjacent active site, thus providing structural explanations for the broad substrate specificity, the product inhibition and the processive degradation of substrates in the chamber. The structures also suggest that substrate binding causes local conformational changes around the active site that ultimately induce the active conformation of ClpP.     

Diverse pore loops of the AAA+ ClpX machine mediate unassisted and adaptor-dependent recognition of ssrA-tagged substrates

ClpX, an archetypal proteolytic AAA+ unfoldase, must engage the ssrA tags of appropriate substrates prior to ATP-dependent unfolding and translocation of the denatured polypeptide into ClpP for degradation. Here, specificity-transplant and disulfide-crosslinking experiments reveal that the ssrA tag interacts with different loops that form the top, middle, and lower portions of the central channel of the ClpX hexamer. Our results support a two-step binding mechanism, in which the top loop serves as a specificity filter and the remaining loops form a binding site for the peptide tag relatively deep within the pore. Crosslinking experiments suggest a staggered arrangement of pore loops in the hexamer and nucleotide-dependent changes in pore-loop conformations. This mechanism of initial tag binding would allow ATP-dependent conformational changes in one or more pore loops to drive peptide translocation, force unfolding, and mediate threading of the denatured protein through the ClpX pore.     

Communication between ClpX and ClpP during substrate processing and degradation

In the ClpXP compartmental protease, ring hexamers of the AAA(+) ClpX ATPase bind, denature and then translocate protein substrates into the degradation chamber of the double-ring ClpP(14) peptidase. A key question is the extent to which functional communication between ClpX and ClpP occurs and is regulated during substrate processing. Here, we show that ClpX-ClpP affinity varies with the protein-processing task of ClpX and with the catalytic engagement of the active sites of ClpP. Functional communication between symmetry-mismatched ClpXP rings depends on the ATPase activity of ClpX and seems to be transmitted through structural changes in its IGF loops, which contact ClpP. A conserved arginine in the sensor II helix of ClpX links the nucleotide state of ClpX to the binding of ClpP and protein substrates. A simple model explains the observed relationships between ATP binding, ATP hydrolysis and functional interactions between ClpX, protein substrates and ClpP.     

Crystal structure of ClpX molecular chaperone from Helicobacter pylori

ClpX, a heat shock protein 100 chaperone, which acts as the regulatory subunit of the ATP-dependent ClpXP protease, is responsible for intracellular protein remodeling and degradation. To provide a structural basis for a better understanding of the function of the Clp ATPase family, the crystal structures of Helicobacter pylori ClpX, lacking an N-terminal Cys cluster region complexed with ADP, was determined. The overall structure of ClpX is similar to that of heat shock locus U (HslU), consisting of two subdomains, with ADP bound at the subdomain interface. The crystal structure of ClpX reveals that a conserved tripeptide (LGF) is located on the tip of ClpP binding loop extending from the N-terminal subdomain. A hexameric model of ClpX suggests that six tripeptides make hydrophobic contacts with the hydrophobic clefts of the ClpP heptmer asymmetrically. In addition, the nucleotide binding environment provides the structural explanation for the hexameric assembly and the modulation of ATPase activity.     

Distinct static and dynamic interactions control ATPase-peptidase communication in a AAA+ protease

In the ClpXP proteolytic machine, ClpX uses the energy of ATP hydrolysis to unfold protein substrates and translocate them through a central pore and into the degradation chamber of ClpP. Here, we demonstrate a bipartite system of ClpX-ClpP interactions that serves multiple functional roles. High-affinity contacts between six loops near the periphery of the hexameric ClpX ring and a ClpP ring establish correct positioning and increase degradation activity but are insensitive to nucleotide state. These static peripheral interactions maintain a stable ClpXP complex, while other parts of this machine change conformation hundreds of times per minute. By contrast, relatively weak axial contacts between loops at the bottom of the ClpX central channel and N-terminal loops of ClpP vary dynamically with the nucleotide state of individual ClpX subunits, control ATP-hydrolysis rates, and facilitate efficient protein unfolding. Thus, discrete static and dynamic interactions mediate binding and communication between ClpX and ClpP.     

The ClpP N-terminus coordinates substrate access with protease active site reactivity

Energy-dependent protein degradation machines, such as the Escherichia coli protease ClpAP, require regulated interactions between the ATPase component (ClpA) and the protease component (ClpP) for function. Recent studies indicate that the ClpP N-terminus is essential in these interactions, yet the dynamics of this region remain unclear. Here, we use synchrotron hydroxyl radical footprinting and kinetic studies to characterize functionally important conformational changes of the ClpP N-terminus. Footprinting experiments show that the ClpP N-terminus becomes more solvent-exposed upon interaction with ClpA. In the absence of ClpA, deletion of the ClpP N-terminus increases the initial degradation rate of large peptide substrates 5-15-fold. Unlike ClpAP, ClpPDeltaN exhibits a distinct slow phase of product formation that is eliminated by the addition of hydroxylamine, suggesting that truncation of the N-terminus leads to stabilization of the acyl-enzyme intermediate. These results indicate that (1) the ClpP N-terminus acts as a "gate" controlling substrate access to the active sites, (2) binding of ClpA opens this "gate", allowing substrate entry and formation of the acyl-enzyme intermediate, and (3) closing of the N-terminal "gate" stimulates acyl-enzyme hydrolysis.     

Both ATPase Domains of ClpA Are Critical for Processing of Stable Protein Structures

ClpA is a ring-shaped hexameric chaperone that binds to both ends of the protease ClpP and catalyzes the ATP-dependent unfolding and translocation of substrate proteins through its central pore into the ClpP cylinder. Here we study the relevance of ATP hydrolysis in the two ATPase domains of ClpA. We designed ClpA Walker B variants lacking ATPase activity in the first (D1) or the second ATPase domain (D2) without impairing ATP binding. We found that the two ATPase domains of ClpA operate independently even in the presence of the protease ClpP or the adaptor protein ClpS. Notably, ATP hydrolysis in the first ATPase module is sufficient to process a small, single domain protein of low stability. Substrate proteins of moderate local stability were efficiently processed when D1 was inactivated. However, ATP hydrolysis in both domains was required for efficiently processing substrates of high local stability. Furthermore, we provide evidence for the ClpS-dependent directional translocation of N-end rule substrates from the N to C terminus and propose a mechanistic model for substrate handover from the adaptor protein to the chaperone.     

Conserved residues in the N-domain of the AAA+ chaperone ClpA regulate substrate recognition and unfolding

Protein degradation in the cytosol of Escherichia coli is carried out by a variety of different proteolytic machines, including ClpAP. The ClpA component is a hexameric AAA+ (ATPase associated with various cellular activities) chaperone that utilizes the energy of ATP to control substrate recognition and unfolding. The precise role of the N-domains of ClpA in this process, however, remains elusive. Here, we have analysed the role of five highly conserved basic residues in the N-domain of ClpA by monitoring the binding, unfolding and degradation of several different substrates, including short unstructured peptides, tagged and untagged proteins. Interestingly, mutation of three of these basic residues within the N-domain of ClpA (H94, R86 and R100) did not alter substrate degradation. In contrast mutation of two conserved arginine residues (R90 and R131), flanking a putative peptide-binding groove within the N-domain of ClpA, specifically compromised the ability of ClpA to unfold and degrade selected substrates but did not prevent substrate recognition, ClpS-mediated substrate delivery or ClpP binding. In contrast, a highly conserved tyrosine residue lining the central pore of the ClpA hexamer was essential for the degradation of all substrate types analysed, including both folded and unstructured proteins. Taken together, these data suggest that ClpA utilizes two structural elements, one in the N-domain and the other in the pore of the hexamer, both of which are required for efficient unfolding of some protein substrates.     

Recognition, targeting, and hydrolysis of the lambda O replication protein by the ClpP/ClpX protease.

It has previously been established that sequences at the C termini of polypeptide substrates are critical for efficient hydrolysis by the ClpP/ClpX ATP-dependent protease. We report for the bacteriophage lambda O replication protein, however, that N-terminal sequences play the most critical role in facilitating proteolysis by ClpP/ClpX. The N-terminal portion of lambda O is degraded at a rate comparable with that of wild type O protein, whereas the C-terminal domain of O is hydrolyzed at least 10-fold more slowly. Consistent with these results, deletion of the first 18 amino acids of lambda O blocks degradation of the N-terminal domain, whereas proteolysis of the O C-terminal domain is only slightly diminished as a result of deletion of the C-terminal 15 amino acids. We demonstrate that ClpX retains its capacity to bind to the N-terminal domain following removal of the first 18 amino acids of O. However, ClpX cannot efficiently promote the ATP-dependent binding of this truncated O polypeptide to ClpP, the catalytic subunit of the ClpP/ClpX protease. Based on our results with lambda O protein, we suggest that two distinct structural elements may be required in substrate polypeptides to enable efficient hydrolysis by the ClpP/ClpX protease: (i) a ClpX-binding site, which may be located remotely from substrate termini, and (ii) a proper N- or C-terminal sequence, whose exposure on the substrate surface may be induced by the binding of ClpX.     

The asymmetry in the mature amino-terminus of ClpP facilitates a local symmetry match in ClpAP and ClpXP complexes

ClpP is a self-compartmentalized proteolytic assembly comprised of two, stacked, heptameric rings that, when associated with its cognate hexameric ATPase (ClpA or ClpX), form the ClpAP and ClpXP ATP-dependent protease, respectively. The symmetry mismatch is an absolute feature of this large energy-dependent protease and also of the proteasome, which shares a similar barrel-shaped architecture, but how it is accommodated within the complex has yet to be understood, despite recent structural investigations, due in part to the conformational lability of the N-termini. We present the structures of Escherichia coli ClpP to 1.9A and an inactive variant that provide some clues for how this might be achieved. In the wild type protein, the highly conserved N-terminal 20 residues can be grouped into two major structural classes. In the first, a loop formed by residues 10-15 protrudes out of the central access channel extending approximately 12-15A from the surface of the oligomer resulting in the closing of the access channel observed in one ring. Similar loops are implied to be exclusively observed in human ClpP and a variant of ClpP from Streptococcus pneumoniae. In the other ring, a second class of loop is visible in the structure of wt ClpP from E. coli that forms closer to residue 16 and faces toward the interior of the molecule creating an open conformation of the access channel. In both classes, residues 18-20 provide a conserved interaction surface. In the inactive variant, a third class of N-terminal conformation is observed, which arises from a conformational change in the position of F17. We have performed a detailed functional analysis on each of the first 20 amino acid residues of ClpP. Residues that extend beyond the plane of the molecule (10-15) have a lesser effect on ATPase interaction than those lining the pore (1-7 and 16-20). Based upon our structure-function analysis, we present a model to explain the widely disparate effects of individual residues on ClpP-ATPase complex formation and also a possible functional reason for this mismatch.     

Binding and degradation of heterodimeric substrates by ClpAP and ClpXP

ClpA and ClpX function both as molecular chaperones and as the regulatory components of ClpAP and ClpXP proteases, respectively. ClpA and ClpX bind substrate proteins through specific recognition signals, catalyze ATP-dependent protein unfolding of the substrate, and when in complexes with ClpP translocate the unfolded polypeptide into the cavity of the ClpP peptidase for degradation. To examine the mechanism of interaction of ClpAP with dimeric substrates, single round binding and degradation experiments were performed, revealing that ClpAP degraded both subunits of a RepA homodimer in one cycle of binding. Furthermore, ClpAP was able to degrade both protomers of a RepA heterodimer in which only one subunit contained the ClpA recognition signal. In contrast, ClpXP degraded both subunits of a dimeric substrate only when both protomers contained a recognition signal. These data suggest that ClpAP and ClpXP may recognize and bind substrates in significantly different ways.     

Turned on for degradation: ATPase-independent degradation by ClpP

Clp is a barrel-shaped hetero-oligomeric ATP-dependent protease comprising a hexameric ATPase (ClpX or ClpA) that unfolds protein substrates and translocates them into the central chamber of the tetradecameric proteolytic component (ClpP) where they are degraded processively to short peptides. Chamber access is controlled by the N-terminal 20 residues (for Escherichia coli) in ClpP that prevent entry of large polypeptides in the absence of the ATPase subunits and ATP hydrolysis. Remarkably, removal of 10–17 residues from the mature N-terminus allows processive degradation of a large model unfolded substrate to short peptides without the ATPase subunit or ATP hydrolysis; removal of 14 residues is maximal for activation. Furthermore, since the product size distribution of Δ14-ClpP is identical to ClpAP and ClpXP, the ATPases do not play an essential role in determining this distribution. Comparison of the structures of Δ14-ClpP and Δ17-ClpP with other published structures shows R15 and S16 are labile and that residue 17 can adopt a range of rotomers to ensure protection of a hydrophobic pocket formed by I19, R24 and F49 and maintain a hydrophilic character of the pore.