Acute Behavioral Responses to Light and Darkness in Nocturnal Mus musculus and Diurnal Arvicanthis niloticus

The term masking refers to immediate responses to stimuli that override the influence of the circadian timekeeping system on behavior and physiology. Masking by light and darkness plays an important role in shaping an organism's daily pattern of activity. Nocturnal animals generally become more active in response to darkness (positive masking) and less active in response to light (negative masking), and diurnal animals generally have opposite patterns of response. These responses can vary as a function of light intensity as well as time of day. Few studies have directly compared masking in diurnal and nocturnal species, and none have compared rhythms in masking behavior of diurnal and nocturnal species. Here, we assessed masking in nocturnal mice (Mus musculus) and diurnal grass rats (Arvicanthis niloticus). In the first experiment, animals were housed in a 12:12 light-dark (LD) cycle, with dark or light pulses presented at 6 Zeitgeber times (ZTs; with ZT0 = lights on). Light pulses during the dark phase produced negative masking in nocturnal mice but only at ZT14, whereas light pulses resulted in positive masking in diurnal grass rats across the dark phase. In both species, dark pulses had no effect on behavior. In the 2nd experiment, animals were kept in constant darkness or constant light and were presented with light or dark pulses, respectively, at 6 circadian times (CTs). CT0 corresponded to ZT0 of the preceding LD cycle. Rhythms in masking responses to light differed between species; responses were evident at all CTs in grass rats but only at CT14 in mice. Responses to darkness were observed only in mice, in which there was a significant increase in activity at CT 22. In the 3rd experiment, animals were kept on a 3.5:3.5-h LD cycle. Surprisingly, masking was evident only in grass rats. In mice, levels of activity during the light and dark phases of the 7-h cycle did not differ, even though the same animals had responded to discrete photic stimuli in the first 2 experiments. The results of the 3 experiments are discussed in terms of their methodological implications and for the insight they offer into the mechanisms and evolution of diurnality.     

The circadian <Emphasis Type="Italic">Clock</Emphasis> mutant mouse: impaired masking response to light

Synchronization of an internal clock (entrainment) and a direct response to light (masking) are complementary ways of restricting activity of an animal to day or night. The protein CLOCK has an important role in the oscillatory mechanism of mammalian pacemakers. Our data show that it is also involved in masking responses. Mice with the Clock/Clock mutation reduced their wheel running less than wildtypes when given 1-h light pulses of light (2–1,600 lx) in the night. With dimmer lights (<2 lx), there were no significant differences between mutant and wildtype mice. Impaired masking responses to light in Clock/Clock mice were confirmed in tests with ultradian light–dark cycles (3.5:3.5 h and 1:1 h). Tests with pulses of light longer than 1 h revealed that, although the mutants responded more slowly to light, they sustained the suppression of activity over the course of the 3-h tests better than wildtypes.     

Masking Responses to Light in Period Mutant Mice

Masking is an acute effect of an external signal on an overt rhythm and is distinct from the process of entrainment. In the current study, we investigated the phase dependence and molecular mechanisms regulating masking effects of light pulses on spontaneous locomotor activity in mice. The circadian genes, Period1 (Per1) and Per2, are necessary components of the timekeeping machinery and entrainment by light appears to involve the induction of the expression of Per1 and Per2 mRNAs in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN). We assessed the roles of the Per genes in regulating masking by assessing the effects of light pulses on nocturnal locomotor activity in C57BL/6J Per mutant mice. We found that Per1^?/? and Per2^?/? mice had robust negative masking responses to light. In addition, the locomotor activity of Per1^?/?/Per2^?/? mice appeared to be rhythmic in the light-dark (LD) cycle, and the phase of activity onset was advanced (but varied among individual mice) relative to lights off. This rhythm persisted for 1 to 2 days in constant darkness in some Per1^?/?/Per2^?/? mice. Furthermore, Per1^?/?/Per2^?/? mice exhibited robust negative masking responses to light. Negative masking was phase dependent in wild-type mice such that maximal suppression was induced by light pulses at zeitgeber time 14 (ZT14) and gradually weaker suppression occurred during light pulses at ZT16 and ZT18. By measuring the phase shifts induced by the masking protocol (light pulses were administered to mice maintained in the LD cycle), we found that the phase responsiveness of Per mutant mice was altered compared to wild-types. Together, our data suggest that negative masking responses to light are robust in Per mutant mice and that the Per1^?/?/Per2^?/? SCN may be a light-driven, weak/damping oscillator. (Author correspondence: shin.yamazaki@vanderbilt.edu)     

Masking responses to light in period mutant mice

Masking is an acute effect of an external signal on an overt rhythm and is distinct from the process of entrainment. In the current study, we investigated the phase dependence and molecular mechanisms regulating masking effects of light pulses on spontaneous locomotor activity in mice. The circadian genes, Period1 (Per1) and Per2, are necessary components of the timekeeping machinery and entrainment by light appears to involve the induction of the expression of Per1 and Per2 mRNAs in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN). We assessed the roles of the Per genes in regulating masking by assessing the effects of light pulses on nocturnal locomotor activity in C57BL/6J Per mutant mice. We found that Per1(-/-) and Per2(-/-) mice had robust negative masking responses to light. In addition, the locomotor activity of Per1(-/-)/Per2(-/-) mice appeared to be rhythmic in the light-dark (LD) cycle, and the phase of activity onset was advanced (but varied among individual mice) relative to lights off. This rhythm persisted for 1 to 2 days in constant darkness in some Per1(-/-)/Per2(-/-) mice. Furthermore, Per1(-/-)/Per2(-/-) mice exhibited robust negative masking responses to light. Negative masking was phase dependent in wild-type mice such that maximal suppression was induced by light pulses at zeitgeber time 14 (ZT14) and gradually weaker suppression occurred during light pulses at ZT16 and ZT18. By measuring the phase shifts induced by the masking protocol (light pulses were administered to mice maintained in the LD cycle), we found that the phase responsiveness of Per mutant mice was altered compared to wild-types. Together, our data suggest that negative masking responses to light are robust in Per mutant mice and that the Per1(-/-)/Per2(-/-) SCN may be a light-driven, weak/damping oscillator.     

Masking in Waved‐2 Mice: EGF Receptor Control of Locomotion Questioned

It has been suggested that epidermal growth factors (EGF) are responsible for the inhibition of locomotion by light (i.e., masking) in nocturnal rodents (Kramer et al., ). The poor masking response of waved‐2 (Egfr^wa2) mutant mice, with reduced EGF receptor activity, was adduced in support of this idea. In the present work, we studied the responses to light over a large range in illumination levels, in a variety of tests, with pulses of light and with ultradian light‐dark cycles in Egfr^wa2 mutant mice. No evidence suggested that normal functioning of epidermal growth factor receptors was required, or even involved, in masking.     

Lesions of the Intergeniculate Leaflet Lead to a Reorganization in Circadian Regulation and a Reversal in Masking Responses to Photic Stimuli in the Nile Grass Rat

Light influences the daily patterning of behavior by entraining circadian rhythms and through its acute effects on activity levels (masking). Mechanisms of entrainment are quite similar across species, but masking can be very different. Specifically, in diurnal species, light generally increases locomotor activity (positive masking), and in nocturnal ones, it generally suppresses it (negative masking). The intergeniculate leaflet (IGL), a subdivision of the lateral geniculate complex, receives direct retinal input and is reciprocally connected with the primary circadian clock, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Here, we evaluated the influence of the IGL on masking and the circadian system in a diurnal rodent, the Nile grass rat (Arvicanthis niloticus), by determining the effects of bilateral IGL lesions on general activity under different lighting conditions. To examine masking responses, light or dark pulses were delivered in the dark or light phase, respectively. Light pulses at Zeitgeber time (ZT) 14 increased activity in control animals but decreased it in animals with IGL lesions. Dark pulses had no effect on controls, but significantly increased activity in lesioned animals at ZT0. Lesions also significantly increased activity, primarily during the dark phase of a 12:12 light/dark cycle, and during the subjective night when animals were kept in constant conditions. Taken together, our results suggest that the IGL plays a vital role in the maintenance of both the species-typical masking responses to light, and the circadian contribution to diurnality in grass rats.     

Circadian modulation of light-induced locomotion responses in Drosophila melanogaster

The relationship between light and the circadian system has long been a matter of discussion. Many studies have focused on entrainment of light with the internal biological clock. Light also functions as an environmental stimulus that affects the physiology and behaviour of animals directly. In this study, we used light as an unexpected stimulus for flies at different circadian times. We found that wildtype flies showed circadian changes in light-induced locomotion responses. Elevation of locomotor activity by light occurred during the subjective night, and performance in response to light pulses declined to trough during the subjective day. Moreover, arrhythmic mutants lost the rhythm of locomotion responses to light, with promotion of activity by light in timeless(01)mutants and inhibition of activity by light in Clock(ar)mutants. However, neither ablation of central oscillators nor disturbance of the functional clock inside compound eyes was sufficient to disrupt the rhythm of light responses. We show that, compound eyes, which have been identified as the control point for normal masking (promotion of activity by light), are sufficient but not necessary for paradoxical masking (suppression of activity by light) under high light intensity. This, taken together with the clear difference of light responses in wildtype flies, suggests that two different masking mechanisms may underlie the circadian modulation of light-induced locomotion responses.     

Impaired masking responses to light in melanopsin-knockout mice

There are two ways in which an animal can confine its behavior to a nocturnal or diurnal niche. One is to synchronize an endogenous clock that in turn controls the sleep-wake cycle. The other is to respond directly to illumination with changes in activity. In mice, high illumination levels suppress locomotion (negative masking) and low illumination levels enhance locomotion (positive masking). To investigate the role of the newly discovered opsin-like protein melanopsin in masking, we used 1h and 3h pulses of light given in the night, and also a 3.5:3.5h light-dark (LD) cycle. Mice lacking the melanopsin gene had normal enhancement of locomotion in the presence of dim lights but an impaired suppression of locomotion in the presence of bright light. This impairment was evident only with lights in the order of 10 lux or brighter. This suggests that melanopsin in retinal ganglion cells is involved in masking, as it is in pupil contraction and phase shifts. Melanopsin is especially important in maintaining masking responses over long periods.     

Further characterization of the phenotype of mCry1/mCry2-deficient mice

Mice lacking cryptochromes (mCry1^-/- mCry2^-/-) were kept in a 16h light, 8h dark, light-dark (16:8 LD) cycle and were given additional pulses of light of different brightness, starting 2h after dark onset and lasting for 1h. The suppression of wheel running during these light pulses (i.e., masking) was compared to that of wild types. No evidence of any decrement in the masking response to light was detected. As well as studying masking, minor bouts of activity occurring in the main light portion of a light-dark cycle were quantified. One possible explanation of such predark activity is that some damped endogenous process is spared in mCry1/mCry2 double-knockout mice. (Chronobiology International, 18(4), 613-625, 2001)     

Impaired Masking Responses to Light in Melanopsin‐Knockout Mice

There are two ways in which an animal can confine its behavior to a nocturnal or diurnal niche. One is to synchronize an endogenous clock that in turn controls the sleep–wake cycle. The other is to respond directly to illumination with changes in activity. In mice, high illumination levels suppress locomotion (negative masking) and low illumination levels enhance locomotion (positive masking). To investigate the role of the newly discovered opsin‐like protein melanopsin in masking, we used 1h and 3h pulses of light given in the night, and also a 3.5:3.5h light–dark (LD) cycle. Mice lacking the melanopsin gene had normal enhancement of locomotion in the presence of dim lights but an impaired suppression of locomotion in the presence of bright light. This impairment was evident only with lights in the order of 10 lux or brighter. This suggests that melanopsin in retinal ganglion cells is involved in masking, as it is in pupil contraction and phase shifts. Melanopsin is especially important in maintaining masking responses over long periods.     

Mice Deficient of Glutamatergic Signaling from Intrinsically Photosensitive Retinal Ganglion Cells Exhibit Abnormal Circadian Photoentrainment

Several aspects of behavior and physiology, such as sleep and wakefulness, blood pressure, body temperature, and hormone secretion exhibit daily oscillations known as circadian rhythms. These circadian rhythms are orchestrated by an intrinsic biological clock in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) of the hypothalamus which is adjusted to the daily environmental cycles of day and night by the process of photoentrainment. In mammals, the neuronal signal for photoentrainment arises from a small subset of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) that send a direct projection to the SCN. ipRGCs also mediate other non-image-forming (NIF) visual responses such as negative masking of locomotor activity by light, and the pupillary light reflex (PLR) via co-release of neurotransmitters glutamate and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) from their synaptic terminals. The relative contribution of each neurotransmitter system for the circadian photoentrainment and other NIF visual responses is still unresolved. We investigated the role of glutamatergic neurotransmission for circadian photoentrainment and NIF behaviors by selective ablation of ipRGC glutamatergic synaptic transmission in mice. Mutant mice displayed delayed re-entrainment to a 6 h phase shift (advance or delay) in the light cycle and incomplete photoentrainment in a symmetrical skeleton photoperiod regimen (1 h light pulses between 11 h dark periods). Circadian rhythmicity in constant darkness also was reduced in some mutant mice. Other NIF responses such as the PLR and negative masking responses to light were also partially attenuated. Overall, these results suggest that glutamate from ipRGCs drives circadian photoentrainment and negative masking responses to light.     

Mice lacking the PACAP type I receptor have impaired photic entrainment and negative masking

The retinohypothalamic tract (RHT) is a retinofugal neuronal pathway which, in mammals, mediates nonimage-forming vision to various areas in the brain involved in circadian timing, masking behavior, and regulation of the pupillary light reflex. The RHT costores the two neurotransmitters glutamate and pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide (PACAP), which in a rather complex interplay are mediators of photic adjustment of the circadian system. To further characterize the role of PACAP/PACAP receptor type 1 (PAC1) receptor signaling in light entrainment of the clock and in negative masking behavior, we extended previous studies in mice lacking the PAC1 receptor (PAC1 KO) by examining their phase response to single light pulses using Aschoff type II regime, their ability to entrain to non-24-h light-dark (LD) cycles and large phase shifts of the LD cycle (jet lag), as well as their negative masking response during different light intensities. A prominent finding in PAC1 KO mice was a significantly decreased phase delay of the endogenous rhythm at early night. In accordance, PAC1 KO mice had a reduced ability to entrain to T cycles longer than 26 h and needed more time to reentrain to large phase delays, which was prominent at low light intensities. The data obtained at late night indicated that PACAP/PAC1 receptor signaling is less important during the phase-advancing part of the phase-response curve. Finally, the PAC1 KO mice showed impaired negative masking behavior at low light intensities. Our findings substantiate a role for PACAP/PAC1 receptor signaling in nonimage-forming vision and indicate that the system is particularly important at lower light intensities.     

Is the PRC for Dark Pulses in LL a Mirror Image of the PRC for Light Pulses in DD in Mice?

The phase-response curves (PRC) for light pulses in continuous darkness (DD) have been described in many mammals, especially in nocturnal rodents. The PRC for dark pulses in continuous light (LL), however, has been described in a few mammals only, in nocturnal for bat and for hamster and in diurnal for Octodon degus, suggesting that this PRC is mirror imaging the PRC for light pulses. Therefore, the effect of 1-h and 3-h lasting dark pulses on the circadian wheel-running activity rhythm of mice in continuous light was investigated and then the PRC for dark pulses in LL was drawn up. For comparison, the effect of 1-h lasting light pulses on the circadian wheel-running activity rhythm of mice in DD was examined and the PRC for light pulses in DD was constructed. It appeared that the PRC for dark pulses, to a certain degree, represents a mirror image of the PRC for light pulses in mice. However, the advance region of this PRC is longer than that of delay. The mechanism of dark pulses action is discussed.     

Masking of circadian activity rhythms in canaries by light and dark

Canaries (Serinus canaria) were kept singly in cages placed in an artificially illuminated, soundproof cabinet. Perch-hopping activity was recorded by means of a computer system. In three series of experiments, the activity rhythms of the birds were entrained to 24 hr by light-dark (LD) cycles with 4, 12, or 20 hr of light (L), respectively. The intensity of illumination was 10 lux in L and 0.25 lux in darkness (D). Under LD 4:20 and 12:12, the intensity of D was increased daily at the same zeitgeber time to 1 lux for 1 hr (L pulse) during about 8 consecutive days. This sequence was followed by 8 days without L pulses before giving another series of L pulses at a different zeitgeber time. Under LD 20:4, the intensity of L was decreased to 1 lux for 1 hr (D pulse). The activity of all birds was more or less increased by the L pulses (positive masking) and decreased by the D pulses (negative masking). The level of masking activity during the L and D pulses depended on the circadian phase at which the pulses were administered. Positive masking by L pulses was minimal about 5 hr after the beginning of D, and increased steadily thereafter. Negative masking by D pulses was maximal at the beginning and the end of L, and minimal during the middle.     

Masking in waved-2 mice: EGF receptor control of locomotion questioned

It has been suggested that epidermal growth factors (EGF) are responsible for the inhibition of locomotion by light (i.e., masking) in nocturnal rodents (Kramer et al., 2001). The poor masking response of waved-2 (Egfr^wa2) mutant mice, with reduced EGF receptor activity, was adduced in support of this idea. In the present work, we studied the responses to light over a large range in illumination levels, in a variety of tests, with pulses of light and with ultradian light-dark cycles in Egfr^wa2 mutant mice. No evidence suggested that normal functioning of epidermal growth factor receptors was required, or even involved, in masking.     

Circadian Temperature and Activity Rhythms in Mice under Free-Running and Entrained Conditions; Assessment after Purification of the Temperature Rhythm

Six female mice were studied separately for six weeks, first in constant light (300 lx), and then on a 12 : 12 L : D schedule (light on 07:00–19:00–h). Food and water were available ad libitum. Abdominal temperature and spontaneous locomotor activity were measured every 10 min. In constant light, the animals free-ran with both temperature and activity records showing circadian rhythms that were significantly greater than 24 h; by contrast, in the LD schedule, the circadian rhythms had become entrained and showed a stable phase relation to this schedule. The direct masking effects upon raw temperatures caused by bursts of activity were clearly seen, and could be removed by a process of ‘purification’. A comparison of the activity profiles during the entrained and free-running phases showed that the imposed light-dark cycle resulted in decreased activity in the light, increased activity in the dark, and bursts of activity at the light-dark and dark-light transitions. Masking effects due to the activity profile were present in the raw temperature profile, and many could be removed by purification using the activity profile; however, there was evidence that other masking effects, independent of activity, were present also. The efficacy of thermoregulatory compensation, as assessed from the rise of core temperature produced by spontaneous locomotor activity, was, in comparison with the free-running condition, increased in the dark phase and decreased in the light phase; this would appear to be one way to limit the temperature rise that occurs in the active phase of the rest-activity cycle.     

Enhanced masking response to light in hamsters with IGL lesions

Syrian hamsters with intergeniculate leaflet or sham lesions were given tests with a series of light pulses of gradually decreasing intensities. The light pulses were given early in the night, at zeitgeber time 14–15. The amount of wheel running during the pulses was compared to that in the same hour on a night with no light pulses. Hamsters with intergeniculate leaflet lesions showed a significantly greater suppression of their wheel running in response to light than the sham-lesioned animals. The lesioned animals also had larger negative phase angles of entrainment to the 14:10-h light-dark cycle than sham-operated controls. However, phase shifting in response to light pulses at either zeitgeber time 14 or 18 was not significantly altered by the lesions. Preferences for spending more time in a dark than a light area were not abolished by the lesions. It is concluded that the intergeniculate leaflet in the Syrian hamster cannot be of paramount importance for masking of locomotor activity by light but may play a modulating role. Accepted: 30 January 1999     

The Nocturnal Activity of Fruit Flies Exposed to Artificial Moonlight Is Partly Caused by Direct Light Effects on the Activity Level That Bypass the Endogenous Clock

Artificial moonlight was recently shown to shift the endogenous clock of fruit flies and make them nocturnal. To test whether this nocturnal activity is partly due to masking effects of light, we exposed the clock‐mutants per⁰¹, tim⁰¹, per⁰¹;tim⁰¹, cyc⁰¹, and Clk^JRK to light/dark and light/dim‐light cycles and determined the activity level during the day and night. We found that under moonlit nights, all clock mutants shifted their activity significantly into the night, suggesting that this effect is independent of the clock. We also recorded the flies under continuous artificial moonlight and darkness to judge the effect of dim constant light on the activity level. All mutants, except Clk^JRK flies, were significantly more active under artificial moonlight conditions than under complete darkness. Unexpectedly, we found residual rhythmicity of per⁰¹ and especially tim⁰¹ mutants under these conditions, suggesting that TIM and especially PER retained some activity in the absence of its respective partner. Nevertheless, as even the double mutants and the cyc⁰¹ and Clk^JRK mutants shifted their activity into the night, we conclude that dim light stimulates the activity of fruit flies in a clock‐independent manner. Thus, nocturnal light has a twofold influence on flies: it shifts the circadian clock, and it increases nocturnal activity independently of the clock. The latter was also observed in some primates by others and might therefore be of a more general validity.     

Disruption of masking by hypothalamic lesions in Syrian hamsters

Negative masking of locomotor activity by light in nocturnal rodents is mediated by a non-image-forming irradiance-detection system in the retina. Structures receiving input from this system potentially contribute to the masking response. The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) regulates locomotor activity and receives dense innervation from the irradiance-detection system via the retinohypothalamic tract, but its role in masking is unclear. We studied masking in adult Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) with electrolytic lesions directed at the SCN. Hamsters were exposed to a 3.5:3.5 ultradian light/dark cycle and their wheel-running activity was monitored. Intact hamsters showed robust masking, expressing less than 20% of their activity in the light even though light and dark occurred equally during their active times. In contrast, hamsters with lesions showed, on average, as much activity in the light as in the dark. Tracing of retinal projections using cholera toxin subunit showed that the lesions damaged retinal projections to the SCN and to the adjacent subparaventricular zone. Retinal innervation outside the hypothalamus was not obviously affected by the lesions. Our results indicate that retinohypothalamic projections, and the targets of these projections, to the SCN and/or adjacent hypothalamic areas play an important role in masking.     

Light Masking in the Field: An Experiment with Nocturnal and Diurnal Spiny Mice Under Semi-natural Field Conditions

Light masking has been studied almost exclusively in the laboratory. The authors populated four field enclosures with locally coexisting nocturnal Acomys cahirinus and diurnal A. russatus, and monitored their body temperatures (T_b) using implanted temperature-sensitive radio transmitters. A 3-h light pulse was initiated at the beginning of two consecutive nights; preceding nights were controls. A. cahirinus T_b and calculated activity levels decreased significantly during the light pulse, demonstrating a negative light masking response (light effect on T_b: ?0.32°C?±?0.15°C; average calculated activity records during the light pulse: 7?±?1.53, control: 9.8?±?1.62). Diurnal A. russatus did not respond to the light pulse. We conclude that light masking is not an artifact of laboratory conditions but represents a natural adaptive response in free-living populations. (Author correspondence: Shayroti@post.tau.ac.il)