Roles of Arabidopsis PARC6 in Coordination of the Chloroplast Division Complex and Negative Regulation of FtsZ Assembly

Chloroplast division is driven by the simultaneous constriction of the inner FtsZ ring (Z ring) and the outer DRP5B ring. The assembly and constriction of these rings in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) are coordinated partly through the inner envelope membrane protein ACCUMULATION AND REPLICATION OF CHLOROPLASTS6 (ARC6). Previously, we showed that PARC6 (PARALOG OF ARC6), also in the inner envelope membrane, negatively regulates FtsZ assembly and acts downstream of ARC6 to position the outer envelope membrane protein PLASTID DIVISION1 (PDV1), which functions together with its paralog PDV2 to recruit DYNAMIN-RELATED PROTEIN 5B (DRP5B) from a cytosolic pool to the outer envelope membrane. However, whether PARC6, like ARC6, also functions in coordination of the chloroplast division contractile complexes was unknown. Here, we report a detailed topological analysis of Arabidopsis PARC6, which shows that PARC6 has a single transmembrane domain and a topology resembling that of ARC6. The newly identified stromal region of PARC6 interacts not only with ARC3, a direct inhibitor of Z-ring assembly, but also with the Z-ring protein FtsZ2. Overexpression of PARC6 inhibits FtsZ assembly in Arabidopsis but not in a heterologous yeast system (Schizosaccharomyces pombe), suggesting that the negative regulation of FtsZ assembly by PARC6 is a consequence of its interaction with ARC3. A conserved carboxyl-terminal peptide in FtsZ2 mediates FtsZ2 interaction with both PARC6 and ARC6. Consistent with its role in the positioning of PDV1, the intermembrane space regions of PARC6 and PDV1 interact. These findings provide new insights into the functions of PARC6 and suggest that PARC6 coordinates the inner Z ring and outer DRP5B ring through interaction with FtsZ2 and PDV1 during chloroplast division.Chloroplasts evolved from an ancient cyanobacterium through endosymbiosis (Gould et al., 2008; Keeling, 2013). Like their prokaryotic relatives, chloroplasts replicate by binary fission, which is driven by a dynamic macromolecular complex located at the middle of the organelle (Falconet, 2011; Miyagishima et al., 2011; Osteryoung and Pyke, 2014). The major contractile components of the division complex include the FtsZ ring (Z ring), which assembles on the stromal surface of the inner envelope membrane (IEM; McAndrew et al., 2001; Vitha et al., 2001), and the DYNAMIN-RELATED PROTEIN 5B (DRP5B; also called ACCUMULATION AND REPLICATION OF CHLOROPLASTS5 [ARC5]) ring, which assembles on the cytosolic surface of the outer envelope membrane (OEM; Gao et al., 2003; Miyagishima et al., 2003; Yoshida et al., 2006). In green algae and land plants, the Z ring is composed of the tubulin-like, heteropolymer-forming proteins FtsZ1 and FtsZ2, which are both required for normal Z-ring function (Schmitz et al., 2009; TerBush and Osteryoung, 2012). DRP5B is a member of the dynamin family of membrane fission proteins, which polymerize into collar-like structures to mediate a variety of membrane fission processes in eukaryotes (Morlot and Roux, 2013). The Z ring and DRP5B ring function together to drive the simultaneous constriction of the IEM and OEM during chloroplast division.The assembly and constriction of the inner Z ring and outer DRP5B ring are coordinated across the two membranes by the activities of midplastid-localized envelope membrane proteins whose functions have been studied in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). ARC6 (Pyke et al., 1994) is a bitopic IEM protein of cyanobacterial origin that is conserved throughout green-lineage chloroplasts (Koksharova and Wolk, 2002; Vitha et al., 2003; Osteryoung and Pyke, 2014). Its N-terminal region extends into the stroma, where it interacts directly and specifically with FtsZ2 (Maple et al., 2005). As FtsZ1 and FtsZ2 are soluble (McAndrew et al., 2001), this interaction probably serves both to tether the Z ring to the IEM and to promote FtsZ polymerization at the division site (Vitha et al., 2003). The C-terminal region of ARC6 protrudes into the intermembrane space (IMS) and interacts with the IMS region of the plant-specific bitopic OEM protein PLASTID DIVISION2 (PDV2). ARC6-PDV2 interaction is required for the localization of PDV2 to the midplastid (Glynn et al., 2008). PDV2 and its paralog PDV1, also in the OEM, in turn recruit DRP5B from a cytosolic pool to the OEM (Miyagishima et al., 2006), probably through direct interaction with their cytosolic regions (Holtsmark et al., 2013). Thus, interactions between FtsZ2 and ARC6 in the stroma, ARC6 and PDV2 in the IMS, and PDV2 (and PDV1) and DRP5B in the cytosol connect and coordinate the FtsZ and DRPB5B rings across the IEM and OEM.Previously, we showed that, despite the fact that an interaction between the IMS regions of ARC6 and PDV1 could not be detected, ARC6 was nevertheless required for the equatorial localization of PDV1 as well as PDV2, suggesting the existence of a factor that acted downstream of ARC6 to position PDV1 (Glynn et al., 2008). This downstream factor was subsequently shown to be the nucleus-encoded chloroplast division protein PARALOG OF ARC6 (PARC6; Glynn et al., 2009), also called CDP1 (Zhang et al., 2009) and ARC6H (Ottesen et al., 2010). parc6 mutants exhibited mislocalization of PDV1 but not PDV2, demonstrating a specific role for PARC6 in PDV1 positioning. PARC6 is restricted to vascular plants, suggesting that it arose by the duplication and divergence of ARC6 following separation of the nonvascular and vascular lineages. As suggested by its name, PARC6 shares significant sequence similarity with ARC6 and is similarly imported to the chloroplast by a cleavable N-terminal transit peptide and localized in the IEM. However, whereas ARC6 has a single transmembrane domain (TMD), PARC6 is predicted to bear two, and while a portion of its N terminus was clearly shown to reside in the stroma, its full topology has not been established (Glynn et al., 2009). Furthermore, genetic analysis suggested that, unlike ARC6, which positively regulates FtsZ assembly (Vitha et al., 2003), PARC6 functions partly as a negative regulator of FtsZ assembly. Interaction assays provided evidence that this negative regulation may be mediated by interaction of the N terminus of PARC6 with the stromal division protein ARC3 (Pyke et al., 1994; Shimada et al., 2004; Maple et al., 2007), a Z-ring positioning factor recently shown to inhibit Z-ring assembly and/or promote FtsZ filament and Z-ring destabilization (TerBush and Osteryoung, 2012; Zhang et al., 2013; Johnson et al., 2015). Although the interaction of PARC6 with FtsZ was not detected previously, the significance of this finding has remained uncertain in the absence of definitive data on PARC6 topology (Glynn et al., 2009).Here, we report a detailed topological analysis of Arabidopsis PARC6, investigate its interactions with other division factors, and assess the effect of PARC6 on chloroplast FtsZ assembly. Our findings provide evidence that the negative effect of PARC6 on Z-ring assembly results from its interaction with ARC3 and reveal a role for PARC6 in coordinating the inner Z ring and outer DRP5B ring partially analogous to the role of ARC6.     

Recruitment of PLANT U-BOX13 and the PI4Kβ1/β2 Phosphatidylinositol-4 Kinases by the Small GTPase RabA4B Plays Important Roles during Salicylic Acid-Mediated Plant Defense Signaling in Arabidopsis

Protection against microbial pathogens involves the activation of cellular immune responses in eukaryotes, and this cellular immunity likely involves changes in subcellular membrane trafficking. In eukaryotes, members of the Rab GTPase family of small monomeric regulatory GTPases play prominent roles in the regulation of membrane trafficking. We previously showed that RabA4B is recruited to vesicles that emerge from trans-Golgi network (TGN) compartments and regulates polarized membrane trafficking in plant cells. As part of this regulation, RabA4B recruits the closely related phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase (PI4K) PI4Kβ1 and PI4Kβ2 lipid kinases. Here, we identify a second Arabidopsis thaliana RabA4B-interacting protein, PLANT U-BOX13 (PUB13), which has recently been identified to play important roles in salicylic acid (SA)-mediated defense signaling. We show that PUB13 interacts with RabA4B through N-terminal domains and with phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PI-4P) through a C-terminal armadillo domain. Furthermore, we demonstrate that a functional fluorescent PUB13 fusion protein (YFP-PUB13) localizes to TGN and Golgi compartments and that PUB13, PI4Kβ1, and PI4Kβ2 are negative regulators of SA-mediated induction of pathogenesis-related gene expression. Taken together, these results highlight a role for RabA4B and PI-4P in SA-dependent defense responses.     

Chloroplast Activity and 3′phosphadenosine 5′phosphate Signaling Regulate Programmed Cell Death in Arabidopsis

Programmed cell death (PCD) is a crucial process both for plant development and responses to biotic and abiotic stress. There is accumulating evidence that chloroplasts may play a central role during plant PCD as for mitochondria in animal cells, but it is still unclear whether they participate in PCD onset, execution, or both. To tackle this question, we have analyzed the contribution of chloroplast function to the cell death phenotype of the myoinositol phosphate synthase1 (mips1) mutant that forms spontaneous lesions in a light-dependent manner. We show that photosynthetically active chloroplasts are required for PCD to occur in mips1, but this process is independent of the redox state of the chloroplast. Systematic genetic analyses with retrograde signaling mutants reveal that 3′-phosphoadenosine 5′-phosphate, a chloroplast retrograde signal that modulates nuclear gene expression in response to stress, can inhibit cell death and compromises plant innate immunity via inhibition of the RNA-processing 5′-3′ exoribonucleases. Our results provide evidence for the role of chloroplast-derived signal and RNA metabolism in the control of cell death and biotic stress response.Programmed cell death (PCD) is a universal process in multicellular organisms, contributing to the controlled and active degradation of the cell. In plants, PCD is required for processes as diverse as development, self-incompatibility, and stress response. One well-documented example is the induction of PCD upon pathogen attack, allowing the confinement of the infection, and resistance of the plant. The signaling events leading to the onset of PCD have been extensively studied: pathogen recognition triggers activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades, as well as production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and salicylic acid (SA), which lead to a hypersensitive response (Coll et al., 2011).From a cellular point of view, several classes of plant PCD have been described and compared with the ones found in animal cells (van Doorn, 2011). PCD is thought to have evolved independently in plants and animals, and genes underlying these mechanisms are therefore poorly conserved between the two kingdoms. However, most cellular features are conserved between plant and animal PCD that are both characterized by cell shrinkage, chromatin condensation, DNA laddering, mitochondria permeabilization, and depolarization (Dickman and Fluhr, 2013). In animal cells, mitochondria play a central role in the regulation of apoptosis (Czabotar et al., 2014; Mariño et al., 2014), and this role is likely shared between the two kingdoms (Lord and Gunawardena, 2012). That said, additional mitochondria-independent PCD pathways have clearly evolved in plants.Genetic approaches have greatly contributed to our understanding of cellular pathways governing PCD in plants. For example, the isolation of lesion mimic mutants (LMMs), in which cell death occurs spontaneously, has allowed the identification of several negative regulators of cell death (for review, see Bruggeman et al., 2015b). Interestingly, lesion formation is light dependent in several of these mutants, which include one of the best characterized LMMs—lesions simulating disease1 (lsd1; Dietrich et al., 1994). The LSD1 protein is required for plant acclimation to excess excitation energy (Mateo et al., 2004): when plants are exposed to excessive amounts of light, the redox status of the plastoquinone pool in the chloroplastic electron transfer chain is thought to influence LSD1-dependent signaling to modulate cell death (Mühlenbock et al., 2008). Additionally, we have previously identified the myoinositol phosphate synthase1 (mips1) mutant as a LMM, in which lesion formation is also light dependent (Meng et al., 2009). This mutant is deficient in the myoinositol (MI) phosphate synthase that catalyzes the first committed step of MI biosynthesis and displays pleiotropic defects such as reduced root growth, abnormal vein development, and spontaneous cell death on leaves, together with severe growth reduction after lesions begin to develop (Meng et al., 2009; Donahue et al., 2010). The light-dependent PCD in the mips1 mutant, as observed for lsd1, suggests that chloroplasts may play a role in the MI-dependent cell death regulation. Accumulating evidence suggests that chloroplasts may play a central role in PCD regulation like mitochondria in animal cells (Wang and Bayles, 2013). First, as described in the case of lsd1, excess light energy received by the chloroplast can function as a trigger for PCD. Furthermore, singlet oxygen (¹O₂), a ROS, can activate the EXECUTER1 (EX1) and EX2 proteins in the chloroplasts to initiate PCD (Lee et al., 2007). Likewise, ROS generated by chloroplasts play a major role for PCD onset during nonhost interaction between tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) and Xanthomonas campestris (Zurbriggen et al., 2009). Finally, functional chloroplasts have also been shown to be required for PCD in cell suspensions (Gutierrez et al., 2014) and in a number of LMMs (Mateo et al., 2004; Meng et al., 2009; Bruggeman et al., 2015b). Thus, chloroplasts are now recognized as important components of plant defense response against pathogens (Stael et al., 2015) and are proposed to function with mitochondria in the execution of PCD (Van Aken and Van Breusegem, 2015). However, the exact signaling and metabolic contribution of chloroplasts to PCD remain to be elucidated. Furthermore, cross talk between chloroplasts and mitochondria does occur, such as during photorespiration (Sunil et al., 2013), but whether such communication functions sequentially or in parallel in the control of PCD remains to be determined (Van Aken and Van Breusegem, 2015).To further investigate how chloroplasts contribute to the regulation of cell death, we performed both forward and reverse genetics on the mips1 mutant. An extragenic secondary mutation in divinyl protochlorophyllide 8-vinyl reductase involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis leads to chlorophyll deficiency that abolishes the mips1 cell death phenotype, as do changes in CO₂ availability. These findings provide evidence for a link between photosynthetic activity and PCD induction in mips1. Additionally, we investigated the contribution of several retrograde signaling pathways (Chan et al., 2015) to the control of PCD in mips1. This process was independent of GENOMES UNCOUPLED (GUN) and EX signaling pathways, but we found that the SAL1-PAP_XRN retrograde signaling pathway inhibits cell death as well as basal defense reactions in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana).     

A transit peptide-like sorting signal at the C terminus directs the Bienertia sinuspersici preprotein receptor Toc159 to the chloroplast outer membrane

Although Toc159 is known to be one of the key GTPase receptors for selective recognition of chloroplast preproteins, the mechanism for its targeting to the chloroplast surface remains unclear. To compare the targeting of these GTPase receptors, we identified two Toc159 isoforms and a Toc34 from Bienertia sinuspersici, a single-cell C₄ species with dimorphic chloroplasts in individual chlorenchyma cells. Fluorescent protein tagging and immunogold studies revealed that the localization patterns of Toc159 were distinctive from those of Toc34, suggesting different targeting pathways. Bioinformatics analyses indicated that the C-terminal tails (CTs) of Toc159 possess physicochemical and structural properties of chloroplast transit peptides (cTPs). These results were further confirmed by fluorescent protein tagging, which showed the targeting of CT fusion proteins to the chloroplast surface. The CT of Bs Toc159 in reverse orientation functioned as a cleavable cTP that guided the fluorescent protein to the stroma. Moreover, a Bs Toc34 mutant protein was retargeted to the chloroplast envelope using the CTs of Toc159 or reverse sequences of other cTPs, suggesting their conserved functions. Together, our data show that the C terminus and the central GTPase domain represent a novel dual domain–mediated sorting mechanism that might account for the partitioning of Toc159 between the cytosol and the chloroplast envelope for preprotein recognition.     

Rapid Severing and Motility of Chloroplast-Actin Filaments Are Required for the Chloroplast Avoidance Response in Arabidopsis

Phototropins (phot1 and phot2 in Arabidopsis thaliana) relay blue light intensity information to the chloroplasts, which move toward weak light (the accumulation response) and away from strong light (the avoidance response). Chloroplast-actin (cp-actin) filaments are vital for mediating these chloroplast photorelocation movements. In this report, we examine in detail the cp-actin filament dynamics by which the chloroplast avoidance response is regulated. Although stochastic dynamics of cortical actin fragments are observed on the chloroplasts, the basic mechanisms underlying the disappearance (including severing and turnover) of the cp-actin filaments are regulated differently from those of cortical actin filaments. phot2 plays a pivotal role in the strong blue light–induced severing and random motility of cp-actin filaments, processes that are therefore essential for asymmetric cp-actin formation for the avoidance response. In addition, phot2 functions in the bundling of cp-actin filaments that is induced by dark incubation. By contrast, the function of phot1 is dispensable for these responses. Our findings suggest that phot2 is the primary photoreceptor involved in the rapid reorganization of cp-actin filaments that allows chloroplasts to change direction rapidly and control the velocity of the avoidance movement according to the light’s intensity and position.     

Probing Arabidopsis Chloroplast Diacylglycerol Pools by Selectively Targeting Bacterial Diacylglycerol Kinase to Suborganellar Membranes

Diacylglycerol (DAG) is an intermediate in metabolism of both triacylglycerols and membrane lipids. Probing the steady-state pools of DAG and understanding how they contribute to the synthesis of different lipids is important when designing plants with altered lipid metabolism. However, traditional methods of assaying DAG pools are difficult, because its abundance is low and because fractionation of subcellular membranes affects DAG pools. To manipulate and probe DAG pools in an in vivo context, we generated multiple stable transgenic lines of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) that target an Escherichia coli DAG kinase (DAGK) to each leaflet of each chloroplast envelope membrane. E. coli DAGK is small, self inserts into membranes, and has catalytic activity on only one side of each membrane. By comparing whole-tissue lipid profiles between our lines, we show that each line has an individual pattern of DAG, phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylcholine, and triacylglycerol steady-state levels, which supports an individual function of DAG in each membrane leaflet. Furthermore, conversion of DAG in the leaflets facing the chloroplast intermembrane space by DAGK impairs plant growth. As a result of DAGK presence in the outer leaflet of the outer envelope membrane, phosphatidic acid accumulation is not observed, likely because it is either converted into other lipids or removed to other membranes. Finally, we use the outer envelope-targeted DAGK line as a tool to probe the accessibility of DAG generated in response to osmotic stress.Diacylglycerol (DAG) is a central metabolite in plant lipid metabolism. Its glycerol backbone is modified with two acyl chains. If a third acyl chain is added, triacylglycerol (TAG) is formed, whereas if a head group is added, it is converted into polar lipids such as a galactolipid. In green tissues, the majority of DAG is used as an intermediate in galactolipid synthesis, because the extensive thylakoid membrane system consists of approximately 85% galactolipids (Block et al., 1983). Although under normal conditions the galactolipids are exclusively chloroplastic, in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), the DAG used to make galactolipids is derived from assembly pathways in both the chloroplast and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER; Benning, 2009). In both pathways, the bulk of the fatty acids are synthesized in the chloroplast stroma (Browse et al., 1986) in the following order of abundance: 18:1, 16:0, and 18:0 (Wallis and Browse, 2002).In the chloroplast pathway, these fatty acids are directly attached to a glycerol-3-P, generating first lyso-phosphatidic acid (l-PtdOH) and then phosphatidic acid (PtdOH) in the inner leaflet of the chloroplast inner envelope (Fig. 1; Frentzen et al., 1983). The acyltransferases involved are specific to the extent that the sn-2 position of the glycerol backbone predominantly receives a 16:0 fatty acid. PtdOH is then used directly for phosphatidylglycerol (PtdGro) synthesis (Babiychuk et al., 2003) or converted to DAG by a PtdOH phosphatase (Joyard and Douce, 1977). The PtdOH phosphatase activity is known to be associated with the inner envelope, though which leaflet is obscured by the fact that DAG can efficiently flip across membranes (Hamilton et al., 1991) and the actual enzyme has not been unambiguously identified and located (Nakamura et al., 2007). However, the leaflet associations of two other enzymes that use DAG in the inner envelope have been established. MGD1, which uses DAG to synthesize the most abundant galactolipid, monogalactosyldiacylglycerol (MGDG), is on the outer leaflet of the inner envelope membrane (Xu et al., 2005), while SQD2, which uses DAG to generate the less abundant sulfolipid, sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerol (SQDG), is located on the inner leaflet of the inner envelope membrane (Tietje and Heinz, 1998). Also associated with the inner envelope membrane are a number of fatty acid desaturases, including FAD4, FAD5, FAD6, FAD7, and FAD8 (Joyard et al., 2010). Two of these are specific, generating lipids with signature desaturations: FAD4 desaturates only the 16:0 fatty acid of PtdGro, giving plastidic PtdGro a distinct 16:1 Δ3 trans moiety (Browse et al., 1985; Gao et al., 2009), and FAD5 desaturates primarily the 16:0 fatty acid of MGDG, producing 16:1 Δ7 cis (Kunst et al., 1989). The remaining desaturases are less specific, with little preference for head group or acyl tail. They further desaturate 16:1 or 18:1 in the cis conformation to 16:2 or 18:2 (FAD6; Browse et al., 1989) and on to 16:3 or 18:3 (FAD7 and FAD8; Wallis and Browse, 2002). The combined actions of these FADs result in the highly desaturated fatty acid profiles seen for most chloroplast lipids.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Overview of DAG pools in the chloroplast envelope membranes. Processes that are known to have activity feeding into or withdrawing from DAG pools in the chloroplast envelope membranes are shown. Enzymes are indicated, and their substrates and products are connected with black arrows. However, for space reasons, not all reactants are shown. Membrane leaflets are indicated, and enzymes with known membrane topology are displayed correctly, while those without known topology are displayed in the center of the appropriate membrane. The acyl group preferred by each l-PtdOH acyltransferase is given in parentheses. Proposed processes transporting lipids from the ER to the chloroplast are shown with dashed arrows. Enzymes are as follows: 1, ATS1; 2, ATS2; 3, lipid phosphate phosphatase γ; 4, MGD1; 5, SQD2; 6, cytosolic phospholipases; 7, MGD2 or MGD3; 8, SFR2; 9, acyl-CoA:glycerol-3-P acyltransferase; 10, l-PtdOH acyltransferase; 11, PtdOH phosphatase; 12, cytidine diphosphate-choline:DAG cholinephosphotransferase; 13, TGD4; and 14, TGD1, TGD 2, TGD3 lipid transport complex. OE, Chloroplast outer envelope membrane; IE, chloroplast inner envelope membrane; ACP, acyl carrier protein. [See online article for color version of this figure.]In unstressed plants, DAG seems to be used primarily in the inner chloroplast envelope. However, several conditions are known to cause extensive DAG use in the chloroplast outer envelope. During phosphate deprivation, MGD2 and MDG3 synthesize MGDG from DAG on the outer leaflet of the outer envelope membrane (Kobayashi et al., 2009). The DAG backbones are probably supplied from the phosphatidylcholine (PtdCho) pool by phospholipase activity, which was shown to be simultaneously up-regulated (Andersson et al., 2004; Nakamura et al., 2005). DAG is also generated during freezing stress by a galactolipid:galactolipid galactosyltransferase named Sensitive to FReezing2 (SFR2). This enzyme transfers the galactosyl head group of MGDG onto another MGDG, giving rise to digalactosyldiacylglycerol (DGDG) and DAG (Moellering et al., 2010). The DAG is subsequently sequestered into a lipid droplet by formation of TAG by an as yet unidentified enzyme.In the ER pathway, fatty acids synthesized in the chloroplast stroma are exported through a still poorly defined mechanism to the ER and activated to acyl-CoAs. Acyltransferases sequentially catalyze formation of l-PtdOH and PtdOH from glycerol-3-P and acyl-CoAs. Again, the acyltransferase working on the sn-2 position of the glycerol backbone is specific, but unlike the chloroplast isoform, it prefers an 18:1 carbon fatty acid (Frentzen et al., 1983). Newly generated PtdOH can be converted to PtdGro or phosphatidyl inositol (PtdIns) (Collin et al., 1999) or hydrolyzed to DAG (Shimojima et al., 2009). DAG can then be further metabolized to TAG and PtdCho. PtdCho acyl groups (18:1/18:1 and 18:1/16:0) are desaturated sequentially by desaturases FAD2 (Okuley et al., 1994) and FAD3 (Browse et al., 1993). These desaturases prefer PtdCho as substrate. The acyl chains modified on PtdCho are transferred to other ER lipids, including DAG, as a result of continual acyl editing of the PtdCho pool (Bates et al., 2012). Furthermore, PtdOH and many of the other extraplastidic phospholipids can be converted to DAG by action of phospholipases (Shimojima et al., 2009). These have as yet partially defined roles in response to stress or recycling of membrane lipids (Testerink and Munnik, 2005).Glycerolipid precursors generated by de novo synthesis, acyl editing, and possibly stress conditions in the ER are transported to the chloroplast by a mechanism that is likely to involve at least two putative lipid transporters: trigalactosyldiacylglycerol4 (TGD4) in the chloroplast outer envelope membrane and the TGD1, TGD2, and TGD3 complex in the inner envelope membrane (Wang and Benning, 2012). The actual lipid species transported remains unclear, but PtdCho, lyso-phosphatidylcholine, PtdOH, and DAG have been discussed in the literature (Andersson and Dörmann, 2009). The DAG moieties are then fully incorporated into all plastidic lipids except PtdGro, presumably using the same pathways that metabolize plastidic DAG, described above. Because of the preference of chloroplast and ER sn-2 acyltransferases for 16 or 18 carbon fatty acids, respectively, the origin of the DAG moieties can be distinguished by positional analysis of the acyl groups on the glycerol backbone (Roughan and Slack, 1982). In Arabidopsis, the chloroplast and ER lipid synthesis pathways contribute nearly equally to mature chloroplast lipids (Browse et al., 1986; Mongrand et al., 1998). Thus, the DAG pools described so far in the chloroplast inner and outer envelope membranes are each of dual origin.A challenge for the analysis of the different DAG pools is that this compound is not a bilayer-forming lipid and thus does not accumulate stably to high levels. Furthermore, during any lengthy fractionation procedure, its levels can be expected to alter, as DAG-modifying enzymes exist in multiple membranes. Moreover, because DAG is quickly metabolized and may have efficient transport systems (Dong et al., 2012), it is difficult to confirm whether metabolizing enzymes are accessing the same or separate DAG pools.To probe different DAG pools of chloroplast membranes in vivo, we have generated a series of stable transgenic Arabidopsis lines in which we target an Escherichia coli DAG kinase (DAGK) to each leaflet of the chloroplast envelope membranes. The basic utility of this approach was previously shown by targeting a DAGK to the chloroplast in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) using a single construct fusing the bacterial protein to the Rubisco small subunit N-terminal peptide (Fritz et al., 2007). Here, we present a full phenotypic analysis of these lines, determining which chloroplast membranes show steady-state alterations of DAG and PtdOH levels predicted by ectopic DAGK activity. We further determine the accessibility of DAG pools generated on the outer leaflet of the chloroplast outer envelope membrane during osmotic stress. Having this system established in Arabidopsis will allow characterization of DAG pools in multiple lipid mutant lines.     

Amyloplast-Localized SUBSTANDARD STARCH GRAIN4 Protein Influences the Size of Starch Grains in Rice Endosperm

Starch is a biologically and commercially important polymer of glucose and is synthesized to form starch grains (SGs) inside amyloplasts. Cereal endosperm accumulates starch to levels that are more than 90% of the total weight, and most of the intracellular space is occupied by SGs. The size of SGs differs depending on the plant species and is one of the most important factors for industrial applications of starch. However, the molecular machinery that regulates the size of SGs is unknown. In this study, we report a novel rice (Oryza sativa) mutant called substandard starch grain4 (ssg4) that develops enlarged SGs in the endosperm. Enlargement of SGs in ssg4 was also observed in other starch-accumulating tissues such as pollen grains, root caps, and young pericarps. The SSG4 gene was identified by map-based cloning. SSG4 encodes a protein that contains 2,135 amino acid residues and an amino-terminal amyloplast-targeted sequence. SSG4 contains a domain of unknown function490 that is conserved from bacteria to higher plants. Domain of unknown function490-containing proteins with lengths greater than 2,000 amino acid residues are predominant in photosynthetic organisms such as cyanobacteria and higher plants but are minor in proteobacteria. The results of this study suggest that SSG4 is a novel protein that influences the size of SGs. SSG4 will be a useful molecular tool for future starch breeding and biotechnology.Plastids originated from the endosymbiosis of cyanobacteria and can differentiate into several forms depending on their intracellular functions during the plant life cycle (Sakamoto et al., 2008). The amyloplast is a terminally differentiated plastid responsible for starch synthesis and storage. Starch forms insoluble particles in amyloplasts, referred to as starch grains (SGs). SGs are easily visualized by staining with iodine solution, and they can be observed using a light microscope. SGs are observed in storage organs such as seed endosperm, potato (Solanum tuberosum) tubers, and pollen grains. Nonstorage tissues such as endodermis and root caps also contain SGs (Morita, 2010).Cereal endosperm accumulates high levels of starch in amyloplasts. The volume of SGs is approximately the same as the volume of amyloplasts that fill most of the intracellular space. SGs in rice (Oryza sativa) endosperm are normally 10 to 20 μm in diameter (Matsushima et al., 2010). One amyloplast contains a single SG that is assembled of several dozen smaller starch granules. Each starch granule is a sharp-edged polyhedron with a typical diameter of 3 to 8 μm. This type of SG is called a compound SG (Tateoka, 1962). For compound SGs, starch granules are assembled (but not fused) to form a single SG, which is easily separated by conventional purification procedures. By contrast, simple SGs contain a single starch granule. Simple SGs are produced in several important crops, such as maize (Zea mays), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), barley (Hordeum vulgare), and wheat (Triticum aestivum; Tateoka, 1962; Matsushima et al., 2010, 2013).The size of SGs in cereal endosperm is diverse. Maize and sorghum SGs have a uniform size distribution of approximately 10 μm in diameter (Jane et al., 1994; Matsushima et al., 2010; Ai et al., 2011). In barley and wheat, SGs of two discrete size classes (approximately 15−25 μm and less than 10 μm) coexist in the same cells (Evers, 1973; French, 1984; Jane et al., 1994; Matsushima et al., 2010). In Bromus species, intrageneric size variations of SGs are observed in which even phylogenetic neighbors develop distinctly sized SGs (Matsushima et al., 2013). The size of SGs can be controlled by manipulating the activity of starch synthetic enzymes using transgenic plants or genetic mutants (Gutiérrez et al., 2002; Bustos et al., 2004; Ji et al., 2004; Stahl et al., 2004; Matsushima et al., 2010). However, the molecular mechanism that controls the interspecific size variations of SGs has not been resolved.The SG occupies most of the amyloplast interior, because the SG is approximately the same size as the amyloplast. The size of amyloplasts may affect the size of SGs, or vice versa. Amyloplasts and chloroplasts both develop from proplastids. The size of chloroplasts is controlled by the chloroplast binary fission division machinery, especially by the ring structures that form at the division sites (Miyagishima, 2011). Proteins involved in the ring structures have been isolated, including Filamenting temperature-sensitive mutantZ (FtsZ), Minicell locusD (MinD), MinE, and ACCUMULATION AND REPLICATIONS OF CHLOROPLAST5 (ARC5). Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants that are defective in these proteins have defects in chloroplast division and contain enlarged and dumbbell-shaped chloroplasts. In contrast to the binary fission of chloroplasts, amyloplasts divide at multiple sites and generate a beads-on-a-string structure (Yun and Kawagoe, 2009). The inhibition of the chloroplast division machinery does not result in enlarged amyloplasts (Yun and Kawagoe, 2009).We recently developed a rapid method to prepare thin sections of endosperm (Matsushima et al., 2010). Using this method, SGs in mature endosperm can be easily and clearly observed. We performed genetic screening for rice mutants defective in SG morphology and size. One of the isolated mutants, substandard starch grain4 (ssg4), develops enlarged SGs in its endosperm. In this study, we characterized ssg4 phenotypes and identified the responsible gene. SSG4 encodes a protein containing 2,135 amino acid residues and an N-terminal plastid-targeted sequence. The domain of unknown function 490 (DUF490) was found at the C terminus of SSG4, where the ssg4 mutation was located. This suggests that SSG4 is a novel factor that influences the size of SGs and has potential as a molecular tool for starch breeding and biotechnology.     

Cell Growth Defect Factor1/CHAPERONE-LIKE PROTEIN OF POR1 Plays a Role in Stabilization of Light-Dependent Protochlorophyllide Oxidoreductase in Nicotiana benthamiana and Arabidopsis

Angiosperms require light for chlorophyll biosynthesis because one reaction in the pathway, the reduction of protochlorophyllide (Pchlide) to chlorophyllide, is catalyzed by the light-dependent protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase (POR). Here, we report that Cell growth defect factor1 (Cdf1), renamed here as CHAPERONE-LIKE PROTEIN OF POR1 (CPP1), an essential protein for chloroplast development, plays a role in the regulation of POR stability and function. Cdf1/CPP1 contains a J-like domain and three transmembrane domains, is localized in the thylakoid and envelope membranes, and interacts with POR isoforms in chloroplasts. CPP1 can stabilize POR proteins with its holdase chaperone activity. CPP1 deficiency results in diminished POR protein accumulation and defective chlorophyll synthesis, leading to photobleaching and growth inhibition of plants under light conditions. CPP1 depletion also causes reduced POR accumulation in etioplasts of dark-grown plants and as a result impairs the formation of prolamellar bodies, which subsequently affects chloroplast biogenesis upon illumination. Furthermore, in cyanobacteria, the CPP1 homolog critically regulates POR accumulation and chlorophyll synthesis under high-light conditions, in which the dark-operative Pchlide oxidoreductase is repressed by its oxygen sensitivity. These findings and the ubiquitous presence of CPP1 in oxygenic photosynthetic organisms suggest the conserved nature of CPP1 function in the regulation of POR.     

Natural Variation in Small Molecule–Induced TIR-NB-LRR Signaling Induces Root Growth Arrest via EDS1- and PAD4-Complexed R Protein VICTR in Arabidopsis

In a chemical genetics screen we identified the small-molecule [5-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)furan-2-yl]-piperidine-1-ylmethanethione (DFPM) that triggers rapid inhibition of early abscisic acid signal transduction via PHYTOALEXIN DEFICIENT4 (PAD4)- and ENHANCED DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY1 (EDS1)-dependent immune signaling mechanisms. However, mechanisms upstream of EDS1 and PAD4 in DFPM-mediated signaling remain unknown. Here, we report that DFPM generates an Arabidopsis thaliana accession-specific root growth arrest in Columbia-0 (Col-0) plants. The genetic locus responsible for this natural variant, VICTR (VARIATION IN COMPOUND TRIGGERED ROOT growth response), encodes a TIR-NB-LRR (for Toll-Interleukin1 Receptor–nucleotide binding–Leucine-rich repeat) protein. Analyses of T-DNA insertion victr alleles showed that VICTR is necessary for DFPM-induced root growth arrest and inhibition of abscisic acid–induced stomatal closing. Transgenic expression of the Col-0 VICTR allele in DFPM-insensitive Arabidopsis accessions recapitulated the DFPM-induced root growth arrest. EDS1 and PAD4, both central regulators of basal resistance and effector-triggered immunity, as well as HSP90 chaperones and their cochaperones RAR1 and SGT1B, are required for the DFPM-induced root growth arrest. Salicylic acid and jasmonic acid signaling pathway components are dispensable. We further demonstrate that VICTR associates with EDS1 and PAD4 in a nuclear protein complex. These findings show a previously unexplored association between a TIR-NB-LRR protein and PAD4 and identify functions of plant immune signaling components in the regulation of root meristematic zone-targeted growth arrest.     

The Axial Element Protein DESYNAPTIC2 Mediates Meiotic Double-Strand Break Formation and Synaptonemal Complex Assembly in Maize

During meiosis, homologous chromosomes pair and recombine via repair of programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). DSBs are formed in the context of chromatin loops, which are anchored to the proteinaceous axial element (AE). The AE later serves as a framework to assemble the synaptonemal complex (SC) that provides a transient but tight connection between homologous chromosomes. Here, we showed that DESYNAPTIC2 (DSY2), a coiled-coil protein, mediates DSB formation and is directly involved in SC assembly in maize (Zea mays). The dsy2 mutant exhibits homologous pairing defects, leading to sterility. Analyses revealed that DSB formation and the number of RADIATION SENSITIVE51 (RAD51) foci are largely reduced, and synapsis is completely abolished in dsy2 meiocytes. Super-resolution structured illumination microscopy showed that DSY2 is located on the AE and forms a distinct alternating pattern with the HORMA-domain protein ASYNAPTIC1 (ASY1). In the dsy2 mutant, localization of ASY1 is affected, and loading of the central element ZIPPER1 (ZYP1) is disrupted. Yeast two-hybrid and bimolecular fluorescence complementation experiments further demonstrated that ZYP1 interacts with DSY2 but does not interact with ASY1. Therefore, DSY2, an AE protein, not only mediates DSB formation but also bridges the AE and central element of SC during meiosis.