Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Its Risk Factors in Chinese Pregnant Women: A Prospective Population-Based Study in Tianjin,China

Objective

We compared the increases in the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) based on the 1999 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and its risk factors in Tianjin, China, over a 12-year period. We also examined the changes in the prevalence using the criteria of International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG).

Methods

In 2010-2012, 18589 women who registered within 12 weeks of gestation underwent a glucose challenge test (GCT) at 24-28 gestational weeks. Amongst them, 2953 women with 1-hour plasma glucose ≥7.8 mmol/L underwent a 75-gram 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and 781 women had a positive GCT but absented from the standard OGTT. An adjusted prevalence of GDM was calculated for the whole cohort of women by including an estimate of the proportion of women with positive GCTs who did not have OGTTs but would have been expected to have GDM. Logistic regression was used to obtain odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals using the IADPSG criteria. The prevalence of GDM risk factors was compared to the 1999 survey.

Results

The adjusted prevalence of GDM by the 1999 WHO criteria was 8.1%, a 3.5-fold increase as in 1999. Using the IADPSG criteria increased the adjusted prevalence further to 9.3%. Advanced age, higher pre-pregnancy body mass index, Han-nationality, higher systolic blood pressure (BP), a family history of diabetes, weight gain during pregnancy and habitual smoking were risk factors for GDM. Compared to the 1999 survey, the prevalence of overweight plus obesity had increased by 1.8 folds, age≥30 years by 2.3 folds, systolic BP by 2.3 mmHg over the 12-year period.

Conclusions

Increasing prevalence of overweight/obesity and older age at pregnancy were accompanied by increasing prevalence of GDM, further increased by change in diagnostic criteria.     

The prevalence and predictors of gestational diabetes mellitus in Hungary

There are conflicting results regarding the frequency of gestational diabetes (GDM) in Hungary. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of GDM and to clarify the association between selected maternal characteristics and GDM risk. In a population-based screening program of GDM in Tolna County, Hungary, 75 g OGTTs were offered to all pregnant women between 24-28 weeks of gestation and evaluated according to WHO criteria in 2000 (WHO GDM). Women were also classified based on the IADPSG criteria (IADPSG GDM). Selected risk factors were recorded by district nurses. OGTT results were available for 1,835 (81.2%) pregnancies out of 2,261. Altogether 159 (8.7%) were diagnosed as WHO GDM and 304 (16.6%) as IADPSG GDM. Gestational diabetes was related to older age, higher BMI, and an increasing number of deliveries (all p<0.005). The risk of IADPSG GDM monotonously increased with age, -pre-pregnancy BMI and number of deliveries. The risk of WHO GDM increased linearly with age, however, women with the highest BMI (≥ 29.2 kg/m2) had decreased risk compared to women with a BMI of 26.1-29.1 kg/m2 (p<0.05). There was an inverse U-shaped association between GDM risk and number of deliveries with the highest risk observed in those with 3 deliveries (p quadratic term=0.008). We found a high prevalence of GDM in this Caucasian Hungarian population. Our results suggest that pre-pregnancy BMI and previous deliveries elevate the risk of WHO GDM only to a certain level, above which the risk decreases.     

Effect of the Diagnostic Criteria of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups on the Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus In Urban Mexican Women: A Cross-Sectional Study

ObjectiveTo explore the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), defined by the previous criteria of the American Diabetes Association (ADA), as well as the criteria suggested by the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG), in an unselected group of urban Mexican pregnant women and to analyze the frequency of large for gestational age (LGA) newborns in this same group of women with use of both diagnostic criteria.MethodsA cross-sectional study included 803 consecutive Mexican urban women with a singleton pregnancy, without concomitant diseases and no prior history of GDM, who underwent a 2-step screening protocol for diagnosis of GDM at admission to prenatal care.ResultsThe ADA criteria identified 83 women (10.3%) whereas the IADPSG criteria diagnosed 242 women (30.1%) having GDM (P = .0001). Fasting glucose concentrations during the 100-g 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test were abnormal in 116 women (14.4%) and in 160 women (19.9%) on the basis of ADA and IADPSG criteria, respectively (P = .004). The frequency of LGA newborns was 7.4% based on IADPSG criteria and 6.0% based on ADA criteria—no significant difference (P = .64).ConclusionWith use of the IADPSG criteria, the prevalence of GDM increased almost 3-fold in comparison with that for the ADA criteria. Nevertheless, no significant difference was found in the prevalence of LGA newborns. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:146-151)     

The Effects of Implementing the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Criteria for Diagnosing Gestational Diabetes on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes

Background

In 2010, the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) recommended a new strategy for the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). However, no study has indicated that adopting the IADPSG recommendations improves perinatal outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of implementing the IADPSG criteria for diagnosing GDM on maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Previously, we used a two-step approach (a 1-h, 50-g glucose challenge test followed by a 3-h, 100-g glucose tolerance test when indicated) to screen for and diagnose GDM. In July 2011, we adopted the IADPSG recommendations in our routine obstetric care. In this study, we retrospectively compared the rates of various maternal and neonatal outcomes in all women who delivered after 24 weeks of gestation during the periods before (P1, between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2010) and after (P2, between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2013) the IADPSG criteria were implemented. Pregnancies complicated by multiple gestations, fetal chromosomal or structural anomalies, and pre-pregnancy diabetes mellitus were excluded. Our results showed that the incidence of GDM increased from 4.6% using the two-step method to 12.4% using the IADPSG criteria. Compared to the women in P1, the women in P2 experienced less weight gain during pregnancy, lower birth weights, shorter labor courses, and lower rates of macrosomia (<4000 g) and large-for-gestational age (LGA) infants. P2 was a significant independent factor against macrosomia (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43–0.90) and LGA (adjusted OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.61–0.89) after multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Conclusions/Significance

The adoption of the IADPSG criteria for diagnosis of GDM was associated with significant reductions in maternal weight gain during pregnancy, birth weights, and the rates of macrosomia and LGA.     

Maternal Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Offspring Body Mass Index from 1 to 4 Years

ObjectiveUsing the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria to diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), the association between GDM and offspring body mass index (BMI) gains in early childhood in China remains unclear. We aimed to assess the association between GDM diagnosed by the IADPSG criteria and BMI gain and the risk for overweight/obesity in offspring from 1 to 4 years.MethodsThis prospective cohort study was based on the healthcare records data from the Medical Birth Registry in Xiamen, China. We included 10,412 mother-child pairs tested for GDM using IADPSG criteria.ResultsA total of 1,786 (17.2%) offspring were exposed to GDM. The offspring exposed to GDM had higher mean BMI Z-score (difference, 0.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02 to 0.12) and risk for overweight/obesity (odds ratio [OR], 1.22; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.40) compared to those unexposed to GDM from 1 to 4 years of age. However, after adjustment for maternal pre-pregnancy BMI (Model 2), these associations attenuated towards the null (difference in BMI Z-score, 0.02; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.07; OR for overweight/obesity, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.25).ConclusionThe associations between GDM diagnosed using IADPSG criteria and BMI Z-score and the risk for overweight/obesity in offspring at the age of 1 to 4 years were largely explained by maternal pre-pregnancy BMI. Reducing the prevalence of childhood overweight and obesity in China should focus on maternal weight status before pregnancy, in addition to glycemia during pregnancy.     

Comparison of Different Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Based on the 75-G Oral Glucose Tolerance Test: A Cohort Study

ObjectiveTo compare the different diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) proposed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA), World Health Organization (WHO), and Australian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society (ADIPS) in a 75-g, 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and to investigate their effects on neonatal birth weight.MethodsHealthy pregnant women were enrolled in a cohort study to undergo a 75-g OGTT during 24 to 28 weeks of pregnancy and then followed up to delivery. ADA criteria and recommendations were used for the management of patients.ResultsAmong 670 pregnant women, GDM was diagnosed in 41 (6.1%), 81 (12.1%), and 126 (18.8%) on the basis of ADA, WHO, and ADIPS criteria, respectively. The kappa value was 0.38 (P < .0001) for the agreement between ADA and WHO criteria, 0.41 (P < .0001) for agreement between ADA and ADIPS criteria, and 0.64 (P < .0001) for agreement between WHO and ADIPS criteria. WHO-only “positive” women had significantly lower fasting plasma glucose (87.9 versus 102.2 mg/dL; P < .0001) and 1-hour plasma glucose levels (146.4 versus 200.5 mg/dL; P < .0001) but higher 2-hour plasma glucose levels (150.1 versus 109.1 mg/dL; P < .0001) than women diagnosed with GDM by only ADA criteria. The correlation coefficient between 1-hour glucose level and neonatal birth weight was 0.09 (P < .02). The adjusted odds ratio of macrosomia associated with GDM according to ADA criteria was 1.34 (95% confidence interval, 0.15 to 12).ConclusionThe frequency of occurrence of GDM was 6.1% in a 75-g OGTT based on ADA criteria, and there was fair agreement between ADA and WHO criteria, moderate agreement between ADA and ADIPS criteria, and strong agreement between WHO and ADIPS criteria. A modest correlation was found between the 1-hour serum glucose value and neonatal birth weight. (Endocr Pract. 2008;14:312-317)     

Antepartum glucose tolerance test results as predictors of type 2 diabetes mellitus in women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review

Background: Women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are at high risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).Objective: We reviewed prospective studies of antepartum glucose tolerance test results as risk factors for development of T2DM among women with a history of GDM.Methods: We searched 4 electronic databases and hand-searched 13 journals for literature published through January 2007. The search strategy consisted of medical subject headings and text words for GDM, T2DM, and other relevant terms. Articles were excluded for the following reasons: (1) not written in English; (2) no human data; (3) no original data; (4) <90% of sample was diagnosed with GDM without a separate analysis for women with GDM; (5) case report or series; (6) diagnosis of GDM not based on 3-hour 100-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) or 2-hour 75-g OGTT; (7) T2DM not evaluated as outcome; (8) no relative measure of association or incidence reported; or (9) design did not address antepartum OGTT as a predictor of T2DM. Two investigators independently reviewed citations, performed serial data abstraction on full articles, and assessed the quality of each article. Data were abstracted for study participants and characteristics, T2DM diagnosis, length of follow-up, regression model covariates, and measures of association and variability.Results: Of 11,400 unique citations, we identified 11 articles that evaluated antepartum glucose testing and risk of T2DM in women with a history of GDM. Five studies found that the fasting blood glucose (FBG) on the antepartum diagnostic OGTT was a significant predictor of T2DM (odds ratio [OR] range: 11.1–21.0; relative risk [RR] range: 1.37–1.5; relative hazard [RH] = 2.47). Risk of incident T2DM was predicted by the antepartum 2-hour OGTT plasma glucose in 3 studies (OR range: 1.02–1.03; RR = 1.3) and by the antepartum OGTT glucose AUC in 3 other studies (OR range: 3.64–15; RH = 2.13). Overall, study quality was limited by high losses to follow-up (>20% in 6 studies) and short duration. Few studies adjusted for adiposity, an established diabetes risk factor.Conclusion: FBG, OGTT 2-hour blood glucose, and OGTT glucose AUC appeared to be strong and consistent predictors of subsequent T2DM among women who met diagnostic criteria for GDM using the OGTT.     

Contributions of total and regional fat mass to risk for cardiovascular disease in older women

The aim of this study was to determine whether trunk fat mass, measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), is predictive of insulin resistance and dyslipidemia, independently of arm and leg fat mass, in postmenopausal women. Total and regional body composition was measured by DEXA in 166 healthy, postmenopausal women (66 +/- 4 yr). Four primary markers of insulin resistance and dyslipidemia were assessed: 1) area under the curve for the insulin (INS(AUC)) response to an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), 2) product of the OGTT glucose and insulin areas (INS(AUC)xGLU(AUC)), 3) serum triglycerides (TG), and 4) high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol. Trunk fat mass was the strongest independent predictor of each of the primary dependent variables. In multivariate regression models, trunk fat mass was associated with unfavorable levels of INS(AUC), INS(AUC)xGLU(AUC), TG, and HDL-C, whereas leg fat mass was favorably associated with each of these variables. Thus trunk fat is a strong independent predictor of insulin resistance and dyslipidemia in postmenopausal women, whereas leg fat appears to confer protective effects against metabolic dysfunction.     

HbA1c Test as a Tool in the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Aims

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a prevalent and potentially serious condition which may put both mothers and neonates at risk. The current recommendation for diagnosis is the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). This study aimed to determine the usefulness of HbA1c test as a diagnostic tool for GDM as compared to the traditional criteria based on the OGTT.

Methods

This was a diagnostic test accuracy study. We performed OGTT and HbA1c test in women attending prenatal visits at a tertiary hospital. GDM was defined according to WHO1999 or ADA/WHO 2013 criteria. ROC curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of HbA1c. Sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios for different HbA1c cut-off points were calculated.

Results

Of the 262 women in the third trimester of gestation enrolled in the study, 86 (33%) were diagnosed with GDM. Only five of these women presented HbA1c ≥48 mmol/mol (6.5%). This cut-off point presented 100% specificity but very low sensitivity (7%). Based on ROC curve, and considering OGTT as the reference criterion, HbA1c ≥40 mmol/mol (5.8%) showed adequate specificity in diagnosing GDM (94.9%) but low sensitivity (26.4%). Unlike, HbA1c values of 31 mmol/mol (5.0%) presented adequate sensitivity (89.7%) but low specificity (32.6%) to detect GDM. For women with HbA1c ≥40 mmol/mol (5.8%), the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 5.14 (95%CI 2.49–10.63) and 0.78 (0.68–0.88), respectively. The post-test probability of GDM was about 40%, representing a 4.0-fold increase in the mean pre-test probability. This cut-off point could eliminate the need for the unpleasant and laborious OGTT tests in almost one third of cases, as 38% of patients with GDM may be diagnosable by HbA1c test alone.

Conclusions

Our results show that combined HbA1c and OGTT measurements may be useful in diagnosing GDM.     

High iron level in early pregnancy increased glucose intolerance

High iron stores in pregnancy are essential in preventing negative outcomes for both infants and mothers; however the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) might also be increased. We intend to study the relationship between increased iron stores in early pregnancy and the risk of glucose intolerance and GDM. This prospective, observational, single-hospital study involved 104 non-anemic pregnant women, divided into 4 groups based on the quartile values for ferritin at the first trimester of pregnancy. All participants were screened for GDM with 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 24–28 weeks’ gestation. We observed that ferritin levels at early pregnancy were significantly correlated to glucose level after OGTT at 1-h and 2-h (rho = 0.21, p < 0.05; rho = 0.43, p < 0.001 respectively). Furthermore, in the higher quartile for ferritin (>38.8 μg/L) glycemia at 2-h OGTT was significantly higher than in the others quartiles (p = 0.002). In multivariate regression analysis, serum ferritin was a significant determinant of glycemia at 2-h OGTT. Although we did not find a significant association in the incidence of GDM in women with higher serum ferritin levels, probably in reason to the limit power of our study, our data demonstrated that the role of iron excess is tightly involved in the pathogenesis of glucose intolerance. We report for the first time that high ferritin values in early pregnancy are predictors of impaired glucose tolerance in non-anemic women. Individual iron supplementation should be evaluated in order to minimize glucose impairment risk in women with high risk of diabetes.     

Elevated Plasma SPARC Levels Are Associated with Insulin Resistance,Dyslipidemia, and Inflammation in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Objective

Recent studies suggested that secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC), a novel adipokine, is a key player in the pathology of obesity and type 2 diabetes. We aimed to determine whether concentrations of SPARC were altered in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) compared to normal glucose tolerance (NGT) controls and to investigate the relationships between SPARC and metabolic parameters in pregnant women.

Design/Methods

Cross-sectional study of 120 pregnant women with GDM and 60 controls with NGT, in a university hospital setting. Plasma levels of SPARC, adiponectin, fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21), insulin and proinsulin were determined by ELISA.

Results

GDM women had higher SPARC and lower adiponectin than NGT subjects; no difference was found in FGF21. SPARC levels were the lowest in subjects in the third tertile of insulin sensitivity index (ISI_OGTT) and correlated positively with pre-pregnant BMI, insulin and 3 h glucose during 100-g OGTT, HOMA-IR, fasting proinsulin, hsCRP and white blood cells count, and negatively with ISI_OGTT, when adjusting for gestational age. Triglyceride (TG), Apolipoprotein A1, apolipoprotein B and lipoprotein (a) correlated with SPARC in partial Pearson correlation. Correlations between SPARC with adiponectin, systolic blood pressure and TG were marginally significant in partial Spearman correlation analysis. In multivariate regression analysis, SPARC was an independent negative indicator of ISI_OGTT.

Conclusions

SPARC levels are correlated significantly with inflammation and may also be correlated with dyslipidemia and represent an independent determinant of insulin resistance in late pregnancy, indicating a potential role of SPARC in the pathophysiology of GDM.     

Consequences of Gestational Diabetes in an Urban Hospital in Viet Nam: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing and is a risk for type 2 diabetes. Evidence supporting screening comes mostly from high-income countries. We aimed to determine prevalence and outcomes in urban Viet Nam. We compared the proposed International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criterion, requiring one positive value on the 75-g glucose tolerance test, to the 2010 American Diabetes Association (ADA) criterion, requiring two positive values.

Methods and Findings

We conducted a prospective cohort study in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam. Study participants were 2,772 women undergoing routine prenatal care who underwent a 75-g glucose tolerance test and interview around 28 (range 24–32) wk. GDM diagnosed by the ADA criterion was treated by local protocol. Women with GDM by the IADPSG criterion but not the ADA criterion were termed “borderline” and received standard care. 2,702 women (97.5% of cohort) were followed until discharge after delivery. GDM was diagnosed in 164 participants (6.1%) by the ADA criterion, 550 (20.3%) by the IADPSG criterion. Mean body mass index was 20.45 kg/m² in women with out GDM, 21.10 in women with borderline GDM, and 21.81 in women with GDM, p<0.001. Women with GDM and borderline GDM were more likely to deliver preterm, with adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of 1.49 (95% CI 1.16–1.91) and 1.52 (1.03–2.24), respectively. They were more likely to have clinical neonatal hypoglycaemia, aORs of 4.94 (3.41–7.14) and 3.34 (1.41–7.89), respectively. For large for gestational age, the aORs were 1.16 (0.93–1.45) and 1.31 (0.96–1.79), respectively. There was no significant difference in large for gestational age, death, severe birth trauma, or maternal morbidity between the groups. Women with GDM underwent more labour inductions, aOR 1.51 (1.08–2.11).

Conclusions

Choice of criterion greatly affects GDM prevalence in Viet Nam. Women with GDM by the IADPSG criterion were at risk of preterm delivery and neonatal hypoglycaemia, although this criterion resulted in 20% of pregnant women being positive for GDM. The ability to cope with such a large number of cases and prevent associated adverse outcomes needs to be demonstrated before recommending widespread screening. Please see later in the article for the Editors'' Summary.     

饮食疗法对妊娠期糖尿病孕妇血脂代谢动态变化的研究

目的:探讨脂代谢紊乱在妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)中的作用,为妊娠期糖尿病的预防及指导临床干预提供理论依据。方法:观察妊娠期糖尿病患者和糖耐量正常孕妇血脂水平及胰岛素抵抗程度差异,分析妊娠期糖尿病患者饮食治疗前后的血脂及炎症标志物的动态变化,于孕12W、24W及36W分别抽取两组孕妇空腹静脉血,测定糖、脂代谢指标及炎症标志物水平,计算血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数(atherogenic index of the plasma,AIP);应用稳态模型胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA-IR)及胰岛分泌功能指数(HBCI),评价胰岛素抵抗指数(IR)程度及胰岛功能。结果:(1)GDM组的C肽、FINS、HOMA-IR明显高于糖耐量正常组(normal glucose tolerance,NGT)组(p0.05),GDM组HBCI指数低于NGT组(p0.05)。(2)干预组与对照组比较,12W时,TC、TG、HDL、LDL差异均无统计学意义(p0.05);24W及32W差异均有统计学意义(p0.05),均较对照组高。(3)对GDM组中TC、TG、HDL、LDL、AIP、hs-CRP、N及WBC值进行分析,TG、TC、LDL、AIP、hs-CRP、N及WBC值24W较36W及12W高(p0.05);HDL水平24W较36W及12W低(p0.05)。(4)NGT组中TG、TC、LDL、AIP、hs-CRP、N及WBC值36W较24W及12W高(p0.05);HDL水平36W较24W及12W高(p0.05)。结论:GDM孕妇存在着明显的胰岛素抵抗和胰岛β细胞分泌功能受损。GDM孕妇合并较正常妊娠更为严重的炎症反应,血脂水平明显升高,饮食治疗后对改善IR有益,提示在妊娠期糖尿病患者中,通过适当的饮食治疗进而对血糖及血脂的调整可以显著减少母儿并发症。     

Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Southern Iran (Bandar Abbas City)

ObjectiveTo estimate and report the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in pregnant women of Bandar Abbas, a city in southern Iran.MethodsFrom March 2002 to March 2004, 800 pregnant women underwent assessment for GDM in obstetrics clinics in Bandar Abbas. The medical history and risk factors for GDM were recorded, and the weight, height, and blood pressure were measured. All the women were screened for GDM by a 1-hour, 50-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), with a cutoff point of 130 mg/dL. All patients with a “positive” screening test result underwent a 3-hour OGTT with 100 g of glucose.ResultsThe prevalence rate of GDM in our study was 6.3% (95% confidence interval, 4.7% to 8.4%) and 8.9% (95% confidence interval, 6.9% to 11.3%) with use of the National Diabetes Data Group and the Carpenter and Coustan criteria, respectively. The patients with GDM were significantly older than the normal group of pregnant women (28.2 ± 5.6 years versus 24.6 ± 5.2 years, respectively) (P < 0.001). The mean number of pregnancies, systolic blood pressure, and body mass index (BMI) were significantly higher in the GDM group than in the normal pregnant women (P < 0.05). Among the recorded risk factors, only age ≥ 25 years, history of macrosomia in previous newborns, and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² were significantly more prevalent in the GDM group than in the normal group (P < 0.05). If selective screening criteria for GDM had been applied, 11.3% of patients with GDM would have been missed.ConclusionThis study showed a higher prevalence of GDM in Bandar Abbas in comparison with other parts of Iran. Screening for GDM in all pregnant women in Bandar Abbas seems necessary, regardless of the presence of risk factors for GDM. (Endocr Pract. 2005;11:313-318)     

Utilidad de la hemoglobina A1c en el diagnóstico de diabetes mellitus y otras alteraciones del metabolismo glucídico en mujeres con diabetes mellitus gestacional reciente

IntroductionWomen with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have an increased risk for developing diabetes mellitus (DM). Their postpartum metabolic classification using a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (75 g OGTT) is recommended. The purpose of this study was to assess the value of hemoglobin A1c for postpartum evaluation in women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus.Patients and methodsFifty-six women with recent GDM underwent a 75 g OGTT at our center to assess postpartum changes in carbohydrate metabolism and were classified using diagnostic criteria of the American Diabetes Association (ADA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis was used to assess the diagnostic performance of hemoglobin A1c, and kappa index was used to evaluate diagnostic agreement between hemoglobin A1c and 75 g OGTT.ResultsDM was diagnosed in 7 women, and other categories of increased risk for DM in 25 women. Kappa index for diagnosis agreement was 0,22. Hemoglobin A1c ≥ 5.7% had 47% sensitivity and 71% specificity for identifying any change in carbohydrate metabolism. A hemoglobin A1c value ≥ 6.5 had 29% sensitivity and 100% specificity for diagnosis of DM. Area under the ROC curve was 0.57 for identifying any change in carbohydrate metabolism and 0.81 for diagnosis of DM.ConclusionUsing ADA cutoff values, hemoglobin A1c is not appropriate for postpartum glucose tolerance evaluation in women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus.     

Association of Oxidative Stress Biomarkers with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Pregnant Women: A Case-Control Study

Objective

The relationship between gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and oxidative stress has not been fully elucidated. This study examined the association between biomarkers of oxidative stress and GDM.

Methods

We conducted a case-control study which included 36 women presenting with GDM and 36 asymptomatic matched control subjects who visited Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Centre, China, from June 2012 to December 2012. Pregnant women were prospectively recruited to the study, and blood samples were collected at the time of a routine oral glucose tolerance test. These samples were then analyzed for levels of endocrine and surrogate markers of oxidative stress.

Results

Compared to control subjects, women with GDM exhibited elevated values for plasma glucose, insulin, and insulin resistance (IR), and showed reduced HOMA pancreatic β-cell function (HOMA-B), insulin sensitivity index (ISI), insulinogenic index, and corrected insulin response at 24–28 weeks gestation. A bivariate logistic regression analysis showed that levels of high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hs-CRP) and high fluorescence reticulocytes at fasting, and hs-CRP in a 1-h OGTT, were significantly associated with GDM. A linear regression analysis showed that levels of hs-CRP (P = 0.003) and reticulocytes (P = 0.029) at fasting were associated with IR, and levels of hs-CRP (P = 0.002) and monocytes (P = 0.006) in a 1-h OGTT were associated with ISI.

Conclusions

Pregnant women with GDM developed a pathological IR and exhibited β-cell dysfunction. Their decreased ability to compensate for oxidative stress was associated with increased IR and a reduced ISI, which might be important factors in GDM.     

妊娠期糖代谢异常对新生儿出生结局的影响

目的:探讨妊娠期不同程度的糖代谢异常对胎儿发育及结局的影响。方法:前瞻性收集我院2009年1月至2010年1月分娩的糖代谢异常的331例单胎妊娠孕妇,分为糖筛查异常组69例、糖耐量异常组126例、妊娠期糖尿病(Gestaional DiabetesMellitus,GDM)组136例,并选择同期糖代谢正常的751例单胎孕妇为对照组,比较四组新生儿出生的最终结局。结果:糖筛查异常组与对照组新生儿结局差异无显著性意义(P>0.05);糖耐量异常组中巨大儿及新生儿窒息、早产儿的发生率与对照组差异有显著性意义(P<0.05);GDM组与对照组差异有显著性意义(P<0.05)。结论:母亲妊娠期不同程度的糖代谢异常对新生儿影响不同。口服葡萄糖耐量试验(Oral Glucose Tolerance Test,OGTT)异常与GDM一样对新生儿发育及结局均有影响,可使巨大儿、新生儿窒息、早产儿的发生率增高。     

Plasma triglyceride/HDL-cholesterol ratio,insulin resistance,and cardiometabolic risk in young adults

Studies in mature adults suggest that the plasma concentration ratio of triglyceride (TG)/HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) provides a simple way to identify apparently healthy individuals who are insulin resistant (IR) and at increased cardiometabolic risk. This study extends these observations by examining the clinical utility of the TG/HDL-C ratio and the metabolic syndrome (MetS) in 2,244 healthy college students (17–24 years old) of Mexican Mestizo ancestry. The TG/HDL-C ratio separating the 25% with the highest value was used to identify IR and increased cardiometabolic risk. Cardiometabolic risk factors were more adverse in men and women whose TG/HDL-C ratios exceeded 3.5 and 2.5, respectively, and approximately one third were identified as being IR. The MetS identified fewer individuals as being IR, but their risk profile was accentuated. In conclusion, both a higher TG/HDL-C ratio and a diagnosis of the MetS identify young IR individuals with an increased cardiometabolic risk profile. The TG/HDL-C ratio identified a somewhat greater number of “high risk” subjects, whereas the MetS found a group whose risk profile was somewhat magnified. These findings suggest that the TG/HDL-C ratio may serve as a simple and clinically useful approach to identify apparently healthy, young individuals who are IR and at increased cardiometabolic risk.     

High total cholesterol and triglycerides levels increase arginases metabolism,impairing nitric oxide signaling and worsening fetoplacental endothelial dysfunction in gestational diabetes mellitus pregnancies

Maternal physiological dyslipidemia (MPD) supports fetal development in human pregnancy. However, some women develop maternal supraphysiological dyslipidemia (MSPD: increased total cholesterol (TC) and triglycerides (TG) levels). MSPH is present in normal and also in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) pregnancies. MSPD and GDM associate with fetoplacental endothelial dysfunction, producing alterations in nitric oxide (NO)-L-arginine/arginase metabolism. Nevertheless, the effect of MSPD on GDM, and how this synergy alters fetoplacental endothelial function is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate in human umbilical vein endothelial cells, the effects of MSPD in GDM and how these pathologies together affect the fetoplacental endothelial function. 123 women at term of pregnancy were classified as MPD (n = 40), MSPD (n = 35), GDM with normal lipids (GDM-MPD, n = 23) and with increased lipids (GDM-MSPD, n = 25). TC ≥291 mg/dL and TG ≥275 mg/dL were considered as MSPD. Endothelial NO synthase (eNOS), human cationic amino acid transporter 1 (hCat1), and arginase II protein abundance and activity, were assayed in umbilical vein endothelial cells. In MSPD and GDM-MSPD, TC and TG increased respect to MPD and GDM-MPD. eNOS activity was reduced in MSPD and GDM-MSPD, but increased in GDM-MPD compared with MPD. However, decreased tetrahydrobiopterin levels were observed in all groups compared with MPD. Increased hCat1 protein and L-arginine transport were observed in both GDM groups compared with MPD. However, the transport was higher in GDM-MSPD compared to GDM-MPD. Higher Arginase II protein and activity were observed in GDM-MSPD compared with MPD. Thus, MSPD in GDM pregnancies alters fetal endothelial function associated with NO metabolism.     

The possibility of prevention of type 2 diabetes

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to examine usefulness of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in clinical evaluation of different glucose metabolism disturbances in subjects with at least one risk factor of type 2 diabetes. We compared the effectiveness of non-pharmacological and pharmacological prevention and treatment regiments on metabolic control in these individuals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study involved 130 patients, with the following characteristics: age between 18 to 76 years, mean body mass index (BMI) - 31.82 +/- 7.24 kg/m(2), and presence of at least one of the risk factor of type 2 diabetes. Glucose metabolism disturbances were diagnosed according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Non-pharmacological regiments were applied for 3 months for patients with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and type 2 diabetes. Patients, whose still met criteria for type 2 diabetes during OGTT after non-pharmacological treatment were scheduled for pharmacological interventions. These patients were assigned at random to two groups, that were treated with either metformin or acarbose. The measurements of total cholesterol (TC), HDL-cholesterol , LDL-cholesterol, trigliceryde (TG), glucose, HbA(1c) and/or OGGT were performed during each visit. We also assessed risk factors for type 2 diabetes in these subjects. RESULTS: The prevalence of abnormal glucose tolerance in subjects with at least one of the risk factor of diabetes type 2 was near 40%. OGTT in these subjects increased the possibility of diagnosis diabetes type 2 and IGT. Hypertension (81%), hypercholesterolemia (71.4%), hypertriglicerydemia (71.4%) and obesity (66.7%) were the most frequent risk factors observed. There were no differences in biochemical measurements between these groups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with at least one risk factor of type 2 diabetes should have screening test to diagnose glucose intolerance. Both non-pharmacological and pharmacological intervention was effective in normalization of glucose OGTT in patients with diabetes type 2 and IGT in newly diagnosed with disease patients.