Floral ontogeny of Ruteae (Rutaceae) and its systematic implications

Floral development was investigated in Ruta graveolens and Psilopeganum sinense, representing two genera in the tribe Ruteae. Special attention was paid to the sequence of initiation of organ whorls in the androecium and gynoecium. The antepetalous stamens arise at the same level as the antesepalous stamens in both species. The carpels are antepetalous in both taxa, indicating the androecium in both genera is obdiplostemonous. Compared with floral ontogeny of the ancestral genus Phellodendron (Toddalioideae), the obdiplostemonous androecium is a derived condition. The floral apex in P. sinense is quadrangular before initiation of the two carpels. Additionally, there are four dorsal and four ventral traces in the ovary. Integrated morphological and anatomical evidence indicates that the bicarpellate gynoecium in Psilopeganum most likely evolved from a tetracarpellate ancestor. Considering the similarities in morphological, geographical and chromosomal features, the ancestor may be Ruta‐like. Further molecular phylogenetic and genetic studies are needed to verify this assumption.     

Cytoevolutionary patterns inRutaceae

Chromosome numbers for 9 tribes and 73 genera ofRutaceae are examined for the probable chromosome base numbers in these taxa. There is abundant dysploidy and infrageneric polyploidy in the largeRutoideae/Toddalioideae complex. We found that x = 18 was typical for the tribesZanthoxyleae andToddalieae; probably ancestral in theBoronieae and perhaps in theRuteae, Diosmieae, andCusparieae; and characteristic of subfamilyFlindersioideae. Considering the basic position of elements ofZanthoxyleae andToddalieae in the family it appears that diploid x = 18 is ancestral in theRutaceae. The morphologically advancedCitroideae are invariant for x = 9 and may be a product of dysploid reduction.     

Phylogenetic relationship of Clauseneae (Rutaceae) inferred from plastid and nuclear DNA data and taxonomic implication for some major taxa

Using sequences of the nuclear ribosomal ITS region as well as the chloroplast DNA trnL‐trnF and atpB‐rbcL regions, this study aims to provide further insight into the phylogenetic relationships within Clauseneae and its relationship to Citreae (Rutaceae). Using maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI), we reconstructed the phylogeny of Clauseneae based on trnL‐F, atpB‐rbcL and ITS sequences. Our data matrix contained 91 accessions, representing 72 species and varieties from 31 genera and two outgroups, including new and extensive sampling of species and varieties representing four genera in the tribe Clauseneae. In the subfamily Aurantioideae, six major clades were resolved with strong support: 1) Micromelum clade: Micromelum; 2) Glycosmis clade: Glycosmis; 3) Bergera clade: Murraya sect. Bergera; 4) Clausena clade: Clausena; 5) Murraya clade: Murraya sect. Murraya + Merrillia; 6) Citreae clade: Citreae. Micromelum, Glycosmis, Clausena and Merrillia were confirmed as monophyletic. In contrast, Murraya s.l. was reconstructed as polyphyletic. Murraya sect. Bergera clustered with Clausena while Murraya sect. Murraya and Merrillia together formed a clade that is sister to the tribe Citreae. All members from Citreae were clustered into a natural group. The genus Micromelum was found to be primitive in this subfamily and more close to Glycosmis. Based on the phylogeny and morphological characters, we discuss the taxonomy of some members of Clauseneae and conclude that the current tribal and generic classification need further revision.     

Contribution of molecular cladistics to the taxonomy of Rutaceae in China*

The treatment of Rutaceae in the Chinese flora chose to follow Engler in recognizing Rutoideae and Toddalioideae as two separate subfamilies. Morphological and chemical comparisons, however, suggested grouping those two subfamilies in one subfamily, Rutoideae. This move has received support from molecular phylogenetic analyses, which also showed that the Chinese taxa in Euodia should be placed in Tetradium and Melicope following Hartley. Investigations into the chemistry and molecular phylogeny of Murraya also indicated that the species in the section Bergera without yuehchukene should be removed from Murraya. These findings clearly show the value of molecular cladistics to the taxonomy of Rutaceae in China and also directions for further investigations.     

Phylogenetic placement of Psilopeganum,a rare monotypic genus of Rutaceae (the citrus family) endemic to China

Psilopeganum (Rutaceae) is a rare monotypic genus endemic to the vicinity of the Yangtze River valley in Chongqing, Hubei, Sichuan and Guizhou provinces in China. It differs from most Rutaceae taxa by its herbaceous habit and has been treated as a member of the tribe Ruteae. Our study is the first attempt to place Psilopeganumin a phylogenetic context and our results show that the genus belongs to a clade with Boenninghausenia, Ruta and Thamnosma, which are part of Ruteae. Within this group, the position of Psilopeganum remains unclear because the Boenninghausenia-Thamnosma clade, Psilopeganum and Ruta form a trichotomy in most analyses. The ITS dataset placed Psilopeganum as sister to the Mediterranean and Canarian genus Ruta, which is corroborated by morphological similarities. Our studies support that Ruteae is paraphyletic with respect to Aurantioideae and that Dictamnus does not belong to Ruteae. The Indian, Sri Lankan, and Malagasy genusChloroxylon is sister to the Boenninghausenia-Psilopeganum-Ruta-Thamnosma clade, despite its traditional placement in the subfamily Flindersioideae. The placement of Chloroxylon is consistent with an origin of the group of Chloroxylon, Boenninghausenia, Psilopeganum, Ruta and Thamnosma in southern Asia. The rapid uplifts of the Himalayas could account for one or two vicariance events splitting the lineages of the Boenninghausenia-Psilopeganum-Ruta-Thamnosma clade, and may explain the short branch length and low support for the relationships among Psilopeganum, Ruta, and the Boenninghausenia-Thamnosma clade.     

Major Clades of Australasian Rutoideae (Rutaceae) Based on rbcL and atpB Sequences

Background

Rutaceae subfamily Rutoideae (46 genera, c. 660 species) is diverse in both rainforests and sclerophyll vegetation of Australasia. Australia and New Caledonia are centres of endemism with a number of genera and species distributed disjunctly between the two regions. Our aim was to generate a high-level molecular phylogeny for the Australasian Rutoideae and identify major clades as a framework for assessing morphological and biogeographic patterns and taxonomy.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Phylogenetic analyses were based on chloroplast genes, rbcL and atpB, for 108 samples (78 new here), including 38 of 46 Australasian genera. Results were integrated with those from other molecular studies to produce a supertree for Rutaceae worldwide, including 115 of 154 genera. Australasian clades are poorly matched with existing tribal classifications, and genera Philotheca and Boronia are not monophyletic. Major sclerophyll lineages in Australia belong to two separate clades, each with an early divergence between rainforest and sclerophyll taxa. Dehiscent fruits with seeds ejected at maturity (often associated with myrmecochory) are inferred as ancestral; derived states include woody capsules with winged seeds, samaras, fleshy drupes, and retention and display of seeds in dehisced fruits (the last two states adaptations to bird dispersal, with multiple origins among rainforest genera). Patterns of relationship and levels of sequence divergence in some taxa, mostly species, with bird-dispersed (Acronychia, Sarcomelicope, Halfordia and Melicope) or winged (Flindersia) seeds are consistent with recent long-distance dispersal between Australia and New Caledonia. Other deeper Australian/New Caledonian divergences, some involving ant-dispersed taxa (e.g., Neoschmidia), suggest older vicariance.

Conclusions/Significance

This comprehensive molecular phylogeny of the Australasian Rutoideae gives a broad overview of the group’s evolutionary and biogeographic history. Deficiencies of infrafamilial classifications of Rutoideae have long been recognised, and our results provide a basis for taxonomic revision and a necessary framework for more focused studies of genera and species.     

Phylogenetic relationships of Ruteae (Rutaceae): new evidence from the chloroplast genome and comparisons with non-molecular data

Phylogenetic analyses of three cpDNA markers (matK, rpl16, and trnL–trnF) were performed to evaluate previous treatments of Ruteae based on morphology and phytochemistry that contradicted each other, especially regarding the taxonomic status of Haplophyllum and Dictamnus. Trees derived from morphological, phytochemical, and molecular datasets of Ruteae were then compared to look for possible patterns of agreement among them. Furthermore, non-molecular characters were mapped on the molecular phylogeny to identify uniquely derived states and patterns of homoplasy in the morphological and phytochemical datasets. The phylogenetic analyses determined that Haplophyllum and Ruta form reciprocally exclusive monophyletic groups and that Dictamnus is not closely related to the other genera of Ruteae. The different types of datasets were partly incongruent with each other. The discordant phylogenetic patterns between the phytochemical and molecular trees might be best explained in terms of convergence in secondary chemical compounds. Finally, only a few non-molecular synapomorphies provided support for the clades of the molecular tree, while most of the morphological characters traditionally used for taxonomic purposes were found to be homoplasious. Within the context of the phylogenetic relationships supported by molecular data, Ruta, the type genus for the family, can only be diagnosed by using a combination of plesiomorphic, homoplasious, and autapomorphic morphological character states.     

Phylogenetic relationships of Aurantioideae (Rutaceae) based on RAD-Seq

The economically and nutritionally important genus Citrus belongs to the subfamily Aurantioideae in the family Rutaceae. Here, we analyzed the phylogenetic relationships of the subfamily Aurantioideae based on RAD-Seq. The RAD-Seq data produced phylogenetic trees with high support values, clear discriminations based on branch length, and elucidations of early branching events. Our genetic classification corresponded well with the classical morphological classification system and supported the subdivision of Citreae, one of two tribes of the Aurantioideae, into three subtribes—Triphasiinae, Citrinae, and Balsamocitrinae. Additionally, it was largely consistent with the subdivision of Clauseneae, the other tribe of the Aurantioideae, into three subtribes—Micromelinae, Clauseninae, and Merrillinae; the exception was Murraya paniculata. With the exception of members of primitive citrus fruit trees, namely, Severinia buxifolia and Hesperethusa crenulata, lower-level morphological groupings under subtribes based on genetic and morphological classifications corresponded well. The phylogenetic relationship between Asian “true citrus fruit trees” (genera Citrus, Poncirus, and Fortunella) and Australian/New Guinean citrus fruit trees (genera Microcitrus, Eremocitrus, and Clymenia) was inconsistent between present classification based mainly on the nuclear genome and the previous classification based on the chloroplast genome. This inconsistency may be explained by chloroplast capture. Our findings provide a valuable insight into the genetic relationships of the subfamily Aurantioideae in the family Rutaceae.     

Phylogenetic Analyses of Aurantioideae (Rutaceae) Based on Non-Coding Plastid DNA Sequences and Phytochemical Features

Abstract: Sequences of the plastid DNA atp B/ rbc L intergenic spacer and rps16 intron from 23 genera and 47 species of Rutaceae were used to resolve phylogenetic relationships in subfamily Aurantioideae. According to these, the subfamily is monophyletic, but its classical subdivision into tribes Clauseneae and Citreae is only justified if the genus Murraya s.s. (exclusive of the species segregated as Bergera , e.g., Murraya koenigii and M. siamensis ) and Merrillia are transferred to Citreae s.l. This conclusion is also well supported by phytochemistry, demonstrating accumulation of carbazoles in Bergera and Clausena , and of 8-prenylated coumarins and polyoxygenated flavonoids in Murraya s.s. and Merrillia. Formation of both carbazoles, as well as 8-prenylated coumarins, and polyoxygenated flavonoids in Micromelum suggests relationships between Clauseneae s.s. and Citreae s.l. The monophyly of several larger genera in both tribes is supported by relatively high bootstrap percentages and specific chemical profiles for e.g., Clausena, Micromelum, Glycosmis and Atalantia. In contrast, molecular, chemical, and other data show that none of the subtribes recognized within Aurantioideae reflect phylogenetic relationships. Only the clades with Clausena + Bergera, Murraya s.s. + Merrillia, and Citrus + Clymenia + Eremocitrus + Fortunella + Poncirus ("true Citrus fruit trees") are well supported by such data. Among the outgroup genera, Zanthoxylum (Rutoideae) and Toddalia (Toddalioideae) are much closer to each other than to Ruta (Rutoideae).     

Molecular analyses suggest a need for a significant rearrangement of Rutaceae subfamilies and a minor reassessment of species relationships withinFlindersia

DNA sequencing has been used to construct two molecular phylogenies at the intrafamily and intrageneric level within the Rutaceae. Analysis oftrnL-trnF sequence data for five Rutaceae subfamilies has shown that there is no molecular support for the current subfamily classifications within the Rutaceae. The Dictyolomatoideae and Spathelioideae belong to a clade separate from the clades containing the remaining Rutaceae subfamilies. Rutoideae and Citroideae do not form discrete clades which suggests a reassessment of the subfamily classification is necessary, particularly asRuta falls within the majority Citroideae clade. Flindersioideae forms a clade within the Rutaceae and does not form a separate family or form a clade with Meliaceae.Sequencing of 17Flindersia species produces a similar phylogeny to that proposed by other authors using morphological methods with two exceptions. The molecular phylogeny indicatesF. amboinensis is associated withF. fournieri andF. laevicarpa and, in addition,F. oppositifolia andF. pimenteliana were found to be genetically identical.     

Distribution of Rutaceae-specific Repeated Sequences Isolated from Citrus Genomes

Three clones of dispersed repetitive sequences (MCS-26a, JA-5and JB-7) were isolated from a library of PCR products amplifiedfrom Citrus DNA using primers complementary to the minisatellitecore sequences. Distribution of these repetitive sequences inthe genomic DNA was highly variable among members of the Rutaceaefamily studied here. MCS-26a was specifically amplified in thesubfamily Aurantioideae, but not in other subfamilies of theRutaceae. Different levels of JA-5 amplification were observedamong genera in the subfamily Aurantioideae. JB-7 was widelydetected throughout the Rutaceae. These data suggest that thethree repeated sequences analysed in this study were amplifiedat different stages in the evolution of Rutaceae and that theyare useful for systematic studies of the Rutaceae. In addition,the repetitive sequences displayed a high level of restrictionfragment length polymorphism (RFLP) among Citrus species andtheir relatives, suggesting that they serve as hot spots forchanges in the genome after amplification. Copyright 2001 Annalsof Botany Company Citrus, Rutaceae, repeated sequences, DNA fingerprinting, RFLP     

Almeidea A. St.-Hil. Belongs to Conchocarpus J.C. Mikan (Galipeinae,Rutaceae): Evidence from Morphological and Molecular Data,with a First Analysis of Subtribe Galipeinae

Subtribe Galipeinae (tribe Galipeeae, subfamily Rutoideae) is the most diverse group of Neotropical Rutaceae, with 28 genera and approximately 130 species. One of its genera is Almeidea, whose species are morphologically similar to those of the genus Conchocarpus. Species of Almeidea occur in the Atlantic Rain Forest of Eastern Brazil, with one species (Almeidea rubra) also present in Bolivia. The objective of this study was to perform a phylogenetic analysis of Almeidea, using a broader sampling of Galipeinae and other Neotropical Rutaceae, the first such study focused on this subtribe. To achieve this objective, morphological data and molecular data from the nuclear markers ITS-1 and ITS-2 and the plastid markers trnL-trnF and rps16 were obtained. Representatives of eight genera of Galipeinae and three genera of Pilocarpinae (included also in Galipeeae) and Hortia (closely related to Galipeeae) were used. Five species of Almeidea and seven of Conchocarpus were included, given the morphological proximity between these two genera. Individual (for each molecular marker) and combined phylogenetic analyses were made, using parsimony and Bayesian inference as optimization criteria. Results showed Galipeinae as monophyletic, with the species of Almeidea also monophyletic (supported by the presence of pantocolporate pollen) and nested in a clade with a group of species of Conchocarpus, a non-monophyletic group. Additionally, C. concinnus appeared in a group with Andreadoxa, Erythrochiton, and Neoraputia, other members of Galipeinae. As a result, Conchocarpus would be monophyletic only with the exclusion of a group of species related to C. concinnus and with the inclusion of all species of Almeidea with the group of species of Conchocarpus that includes its type species, C. macrophyllus. Thus, species of Almeidea are transferred to Conchocarpus, and the new combinations are made here.     

The Biochemical of Tetradium,Euodia and Melicope and their significance in the Rutaceae

From the stem and root barks of Tetradium glabrifolium (Rutaceae) benzophenanthridine alkaloids have been isolated together with furoquinoline alkaloids, coumarins and limonoids. The occurrence of the l-benzyltetrahydroisoquinolinederived benzophenanthridines adds Tetradium to the small group of rutaceous genera (Fagaropsis, Phellodendron, Toddalia, Zanthoxylum) known to produce alkaloids of this type. These findings support Hartley's decision to reassign taxa from Euodia (sensu Engler) into the three genera Tetradium, Euodia s. s. and Melicope and his contention that Tetradium is closely allied to Zanthoxylum and Phellodendron, with which it shares several unusual chemical characters. Hartley's re-alignment of Tetradium, which cuts across Engler's sub-families Rutoideae and Toddalioideae, is therefore sustained by the known distribution of secondary metabolites, whilst available information suggests a wide disparity between the chemical profiles of Tetradium and Melicope. The chemosystematic significance of the addition of Tetradium to the 1-benzyltetrahydroisoquinoline producing genera and the potential of these taxa to have acted as a starting point for biochemical evolution within the Rutaceae is discussed.     

Phylogenetic Relationships of Citrus and Its Relatives Based on matK Gene Sequences

The genus Citrus includes mandarin, orange, lemon, grapefruit and lime, which have high economic and nutritional value. The family Rutaceae can be divided into 7 subfamilies, including Aurantioideae. The genus Citrus belongs to the subfamily Aurantioideae. In this study, we sequenced the chloroplast matK genes of 135 accessions from 22 genera of Aurantioideae and analyzed them phylogenetically. Our study includes many accessions that have not been examined in other studies. The subfamily Aurantioideae has been classified into 2 tribes, Clauseneae and Citreae, and our current molecular analysis clearly discriminate Citreae from Clauseneae by using only 1 chloroplast DNA sequence. Our study confirms previous observations on the molecular phylogeny of Aurantioideae in many aspects. However, we have provided novel information on these genetic relationships. For example, inconsistent with the previous observation, and consistent with our preliminary study using the chloroplast rbcL genes, our analysis showed that Feroniella oblata is not nested in Citrus species and is closely related with Feronia limonia. Furthermore, we have shown that Murraya paniculata is similar to Merrillia caloxylon and is dissimilar to Murraya koenigii. We found that “true citrus fruit trees” could be divided into 2 subclusters. One subcluster included Citrus, Fortunella, and Poncirus, while the other cluster included Microcitrus and Eremocitrus. Compared to previous studies, our current study is the most extensive phylogenetic study of Citrus species since it includes 93 accessions. The results indicate that Citrus species can be classified into 3 clusters: a citron cluster, a pummelo cluster, and a mandarin cluster. Although most mandarin accessions belonged to the mandarin cluster, we found some exceptions. We also obtained the information on the genetic background of various species of acid citrus grown in Japan. Because the genus Citrus contains many important accessions, we have comprehensively discussed the classification of this genus.     

Structure and evolution of the androecium in the Malvatheca clade (Malvaceae s.l.) and implications for Malvaceae and Malvales

Androecial development and structure as well as floral vasculature of six selected species of Bombacoideae and of several smaller lineages of the Malvatheca clade (Malvaceae s.l.) were studied. All studied taxa share a similar pattern of androecial development: initially, five antepetalous/antetepalous and five alternipetalous/alternitepalous primary androecial primordia develop on a ring wall. Two elongate secondary androecial primordia form on each antepetalous/antetepalous sector. At anthesis the androecium consists of an androecial tube crowned by five androecial lobes. Each of these lobes is the developmental product of an alternipetalous/alternitepalous primary androecial primordium and its two neighbouring antepetalous/antetepalous secondary androecial primordia. The elongate, sessile androecial units are positioned along the lateral margins of the androecial lobes and in the distal part of the androecial tube. Seen in the light of the most recent studies of floral development and phylogeny of the Malvaceae and the Malvales as a whole, our data indicate that i) elongate, sessile androecial units are ancestral in the Malvatheca clade, that ii) an obdiplostemonous floral ground plan is a synapomorphy for the Malvaceae, and that iii) diplostemony is most likely ancestral in the Malvales.     

Zygomorphy evolved from disymmetry in Fumarioideae (Papaveraceae,Ranunculales): new evidence from an expanded molecular phylogenetic framework

Background and Aims Fumarioideae (20 genera, 593 species) is a clade of Papaveraceae (Ranunculales) characterized by flowers that are either disymmetric (i.e. two perpendicular planes of bilateral symmetry) or zygomorphic (i.e. one plane of bilateral symmetry). In contrast, the other subfamily of Papaveraceae, Papaveroideae (23 genera, 230 species), has actinomorphic flowers (i.e. more than two planes of symmetry). Understanding of the evolution of floral symmetry in this clade has so far been limited by the lack of a reliable phylogenetic framework. Pteridophyllum (one species) shares similarities with Fumarioideae but has actinomorphic flowers, and the relationships among Pteridophyllum, Papaveroideae and Fumarioideae have remained unclear. This study reassesses the evolution of floral symmetry in Papaveraceae based on new molecular phylogenetic analyses of the family.Methods Maximum likelihood, Bayesian and maximum parsimony phylogenetic analyses of Papaveraceae were conducted using six plastid markers and one nuclear marker, sampling Pteridophyllum, 18 (90 %) genera and 73 species of Fumarioideae, 11 (48 %) genera and 11 species of Papaveroideae, and a wide selection of outgroup taxa. Floral characters recorded from the literature were then optimized onto phylogenetic trees to reconstruct ancestral states using parsimony, maximum likelihood and reversible-jump Bayesian approaches.Key Results Pteridophyllum is not nested in Fumarioideae. Fumarioideae are monophyletic and Hypecoum (18 species) is the sister group of the remaining genera. Relationships within the core Fumarioideae are well resolved and supported. Dactylicapnos and all zygomorphic genera form a well-supported clade nested among disymmetric taxa.Conclusions Disymmetry of the corolla is a synapomorphy of Fumarioideae and is strongly correlated with changes in the androecium and differentiation of middle and inner tepal shape (basal spurs on middle tepals). Zygomorphy subsequently evolved from disymmetry either once (with a reversal in Dactylicapnos) or twice (Capnoides, other zygomorphic Fumarioideae) and appears to be correlated with the loss of one nectar spur.     

Structure of the inflorescence and flower ofPetalonyx linearis (Loasaceae)

Fossil chloranthoid androecia,Chloranthistemon endressii gen. et spec. nov. are described from the Upper Cretaceous (Upper Santonian or Lower Campanian) of Scania, southern Sweden. They are three-lobed and dorsiventrally flattened with all pollen sacs borne laterally and inclined toward the presumed adaxial surface. The central lobe bears two pairs of pollen sacs, the lateral lobes a single pair each. The morphology, anatomy and valvate dehiscence of the fossil androecia is very similar to that seen in extant species ofChloranthus andSarcandra, but the in situ pollen differs from that of all extantChloranthaceae in being spiraperturate. A single chloranthoid androecium from the Lower Cretaceous (Upper Albian) of Maryland, North America has a more generalized structure thanChloranthistemon endressii. It consists of three stamens that are fused at the base, and each stamen bears two pairs of oppositely positioned pollen sacs. Combined with anatomical information from recentChloranthus the Lower Cretaceous specimen suggests that the androecium in the living genus has arisen by fusion and other modifications of three separate stamens each with a normal complement of four pollen sacs. The structure of both the Upper and Lower Cretaceous androecia suggest that these fossilChloranthaceae were insectpollinated. Macrofossil evidence combined with information from dispersed pollen indicates that theChloranthaceae diversified early in angiosperm fossil history and were an important component of Mid-Cretaceous plant communities.