Synaptic dysfunction,memory deficits and hippocampal atrophy due to ablation of mitochondrial fission in adult forebrain neurons

Well-balanced mitochondrial fission and fusion processes are essential for nervous system development. Loss of function of the main mitochondrial fission mediator, dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1), is lethal early during embryonic development or around birth, but the role of mitochondrial fission in adult neurons remains unclear. Here we show that inducible Drp1 ablation in neurons of the adult mouse forebrain results in progressive, neuronal subtype-specific alterations of mitochondrial morphology in the hippocampus that are marginally responsive to antioxidant treatment. Furthermore, DRP1 loss affects synaptic transmission and memory function. Although these changes culminate in hippocampal atrophy, they are not sufficient to cause neuronal cell death within 10 weeks of genetic Drp1 ablation. Collectively, our in vivo observations clarify the role of mitochondrial fission in neurons, demonstrating that Drp1 ablation in adult forebrain neurons compromises critical neuronal functions without causing overt neurodegeneration.In addition to their crucial importance in energy conversion, mitochondria serve many other housekeeping functions, including calcium buffering, amino-acid and steroid biosynthesis as well as fatty acids beta-oxidation and regulation of cell death. During the past decade, it has become increasingly clear that processes regulating mitochondrial morphology and ultrastructure are influenced by specific cellular requirements upon which mitochondria, in a precisely regulated manner, undergo fusion and division events.¹ Maintaining this balance is especially important for highly energy-consuming, polarized cells such as neurons, where single organellar units sprouting from the mitochondrial network are transported along the cytoskeleton into dendrites and spines to meet local energy requirements.² In addition, elaborate quality-control mechanisms also rely on mitochondrial dynamics: whereas defective organelles are sequestered by fission, enabling their removal from the mitochondrial network,^{3, 4} fusion supports qualitative homogeneity of the syncytium through complementation.⁵Mitochondrial fusion and fission are mediated by large GTPases of the dynamin superfamily.⁶ The outer mitochondrial membrane mitofusins 1 (MFN1) and 2 (MFN2) tether mitochondrial membranes by homodimer or heterodimer formation,⁷ thereby initiating fusion of the organelles, a process that also involves the inner mitochondrial membrane-associated GTPase Optic Atrophy 1.⁸ In addition, MFN2 also mediates contacts between mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum.⁹ The only known mammalian mitochondrial fission protein, Dynamin-Related Protein 1 (Drp1), translocates upon dephosphorylation by calcineurin¹⁰ to fission sites where it binds to mitochondrial fission factor.¹¹ Drp1 translocation is preceded by ER membranes wrapping around mitochondria to constrict the organelles,¹² thereby facilitating the formation of multimeric Drp1 complexes that, upon GTP hydrolysis, further tighten to complete the process of mitochondrial fission.¹³Genetic evidence in mice and humans indicates that mitochondrial dynamics are crucially important in neurons: in humans, a sporadic dominant-negative DRP1 mutation caused a lethal syndromic defect with abnormal brain development;¹⁴ similarly, constitutive Drp1 knockout in the mouse brain leads to lethal neurodevelopmental defects.^{15, 16} Although the crucial role of Drp1 during brain development is undisputed, studies on Drp1 function in postmitotic (adult) neurons are scarce; likewise, Drp1 ablation studies in primary cultures have so far failed to yield a conclusive picture. In vitro, Drp1 ablation is reported to lead to a super-elongated neuroprotective^{17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24} or an aggregated mitochondrial phenotype associated with neurodegeneration.^{15, 16, 25, 26, 27} These discrepancies are probably due to different experimental conditions: neuronal health is indeed influenced by the onset and duration of Drp1 inhibition, which varies considerably among the cited reports,²⁸ and different types of neuronal cultures studied display different sensitivity to Drp1 inhibition. In vivo, Drp1 ablation in Purkinje cells results in oxidative stress and neurodegeneration,²⁹ demonstrating that Drp1 is essential for postmitotic neurons'' health. In contrast, transient pharmacological Drp1 inhibition is neuroprotective in several mouse ischemia models, indicating that temporarily blocking mitochondrial fission holds therapeutic potential.^{30, 31, 32}To elucidate the consequences of blocked mitochondrial fission in the central nervous system in vivo, we bypassed the critical role of Drp1 during brain development by generating Drp1^flx/flx mice¹⁵ expressing tamoxifen-inducible Cre recombinase under the control of the CaMKIIα promoter.³³ Upon induced Drp1 deletion in postmitotic adult mouse forebrain neurons, mice develop progressive, neuronal subtype-specific alterations in mitochondrial shape and distribution in the absence of overt neurodegeneration. In addition, respiratory capacity, ATP content, synaptic reserve pool vesicle recruitment as well as spatial working memory are impaired, demonstrating that severely dysregulated mitochondrial dynamics can compromise critical neuronal functions in vivo without causing neuronal cell death.     

Cerium oxide nanoparticles protect against Aβ-induced mitochondrial fragmentation and neuronal cell death

Evidence indicates that nitrosative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction participate in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer''s disease (AD). Amyloid beta (Aβ) and peroxynitrite induce mitochondrial fragmentation and neuronal cell death by abnormal activation of dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1), a large GTPase that regulates mitochondrial fission. The exact mechanisms of mitochondrial fragmentation and DRP1 overactivation in AD remain unknown; however, DRP1 serine 616 (S616) phosphorylation is likely involved. Although it is clear that nitrosative stress caused by peroxynitrite has a role in AD, effective antioxidant therapies are lacking. Cerium oxide nanoparticles, or nanoceria, switch between their Ce³⁺ and Ce⁴⁺ states and are able to scavenge superoxide anions, hydrogen peroxide and peroxynitrite. Therefore, nanoceria might protect against neurodegeneration. Here we report that nanoceria are internalized by neurons and accumulate at the mitochondrial outer membrane and plasma membrane. Furthermore, nanoceria reduce levels of reactive nitrogen species and protein tyrosine nitration in neurons exposed to peroxynitrite. Importantly, nanoceria reduce endogenous peroxynitrite and Aβ-induced mitochondrial fragmentation, DRP1 S616 hyperphosphorylation and neuronal cell death.Nitric oxide (NO) is a neurotransmitter and neuromodulator required for learning and memory.¹ NO is generated by NO synthases, a group of enzymes that produce NO from L-arginine. In addition to its normal role in physiology, NO is implicated in pathophysiology. When overproduced, NO combines with superoxide anions (O₂·⁻), byproducts of aerobic metabolism and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, to form peroxynitrite anions (ONOO⁻) that are highly reactive and neurotoxic. Accumulation of these reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), known as oxidative and nitrosative stress, respectively, is a common feature of aging, neurodegeneration and Alzheimer''s disease (AD).¹Nitrosative stress caused by peroxynitrite has a critical role in the etiology and pathogenesis of AD.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Peroxynitrite is implicated in the formation of the two hallmarks of AD, Aβ aggregates and neurofibrillary tangles containing hyperphosphorylated Tau protein.^{1, 4, 7} In addition, peroxynitrite promotes the nitrotyrosination of presenilin 1, the catalytic subunit of the γ-secretase complex, which shifts production of Aβ to amyloid beta (Aβ)42 and increases the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, ultimately resulting in an increased propensity for aggregation and neurotoxicity.⁵ Furthermore, nitration of Aβ tyrosine 10 enhances its aggregation.⁶ Peroxynitrite can also modify enzymes, such as triosephosphate isomerase,⁴ and activate kinases, including Jun amino-terminal kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, which enhance neuronal cell death.^{8, 9} Moreover, peroxynitrite can trigger the release of free metals such as Zn²⁺ from intracellular stores with consequent inhibition of mitochondrial function and enhancement of neuronal cell death.^{10, 11, 12} Finally, peroxynitrite can irreversibly inhibit complexes I and IV of the mitochondrial respiratory chain.^{11, 13}Because mitochondria have a critical role in neurons as energy producers to fuel vital processes such as synaptic transmission and axonal transport,¹⁴ and mitochondrial dysfunction is a well-documented and early event in AD,¹⁵ it is important to consider how peroxynitrite and nitrosative stress affect mitochondria. Although the ultimate cause of mitochondrial dysfunction in AD remains unclear, an imbalance in mitochondrial fission and fusion is one possibility.^{1, 14, 16, 17, 18} Notably, peroxynitrite, N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor activation and Aβ can induce mitochondrial fragmentation by activating mitochondrial fission and/or inhibiting fusion.¹⁶ Mitochondrial fission and fusion is regulated by large GTPases of the dynamin family, including dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1) that is required for mitochondrial division,¹⁹ and inhibition of mitochondrial division by overexpression of the GTPase-defective DRP1^K38A mutant provides protection against peroxynitrite-, NMDA- and Aβ-induced mitochondrial fragmentation and neuronal cell death.¹⁶The exact mechanism of peroxynitrite-induced mitochondrial fragmentation remains unclear. A recent report suggested that S-nitrosylation of DRP1 at cysteine 644 increases DRP1 activity and is the cause of peroxynitrite-induced mitochondrial fragmentation in AD;²⁰ however, the work remains controversial, suggesting that alternative pathways might be involved.²¹ For example, peroxynitrite also causes rapid DRP1 S616 phosphorylation that promotes its translocation to mitochondria and organelle division.^{21, 22} In mitotic cells, DRP1 S616 phosphorylation is mediated by Cdk1/cyclinB1 and synchronizes mitochondrial division with cell division.²³ Interestingly, DRP1 is S616 hyperphosphorylated in AD brains, suggesting that this event might contribute to mitochondrial fragmentation in the disease.^{21, 22} A recent report indicates that Cdk5/p35 is responsible for DRP1 S616 phosphorylation,²⁴ and notably aberrant Cdk5/p35/p25 signaling is associated with AD pathogenesis.²⁵ Thus, we explored here the possible role of DRP1 S616 hyperphosphorylation in Aβ- and peroxynitrite-mediated mitochondrial fragmentation.Under normal conditions, accumulated mitochondrial superoxide anions and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) can be neutralized by superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase. Nitrosative stress in aging and AD might be explained by a loss of antioxidant enzymes. Previous studies suggest that expression of SOD subtypes is decreased in the human AD brain.^{26, 27} Furthermore, SOD1 deletion in a mouse model of AD increased the burden of amyloid plaques.²⁶ By contrast, overexpression of SOD2 in a mouse model of AD decreased the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio and alleviated memory deficits.^{28, 29} There is currently a lack of antioxidants that can effectively quench superoxide anions, H₂O₂ or peroxynitrite and provide lasting effects. Cerium is a rare earth element and cerium oxide (CeO₂) nanoparticles, or nanoceria, shuttle between their 3+ or 4+ states. Oxidation of Ce⁴⁺ to Ce³⁺ causes oxygen vacancies and defects on the surface of the crystalline lattice structure of the nanoparticles, generating a cage for redox reactions to occur.³⁰ Accordingly, nanoceria mimic the catalytic activities of antioxidant enzymes, such as SOD^{31, 32} and catalase,³³ and are able to neutralize peroxynitrite.³⁴ Because of these antioxidant properties, we hypothesized that nanoceria could detoxify peroxynitrite and protect against Aβ-induced DRP1 S616 hyperphosphorylation, mitochondrial fragmentation and neuronal cell death.     

New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus After Transplantation in a Cynomolgus Macaque (Macaca fasicularis)

A 5.5-y-old intact male cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fasicularis) presented with inappetence and weight loss 57 d after heterotopic heart and thymus transplantation while receiving an immunosuppressant regimen consisting of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone to prevent graft rejection. A serum chemistry panel, a glycated hemoglobin test, and urinalysis performed at presentation revealed elevated blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels (727 mg/dL and 10.1%, respectively), glucosuria, and ketonuria. Diabetes mellitus was diagnosed, and insulin therapy was initiated immediately. The macaque was weaned off the immunosuppressive therapy as his clinical condition improved and stabilized. Approximately 74 d after discontinuation of the immunosuppressants, the blood glucose normalized, and the insulin therapy was stopped. The animal''s blood glucose and HbA1c values have remained within normal limits since this time. We suspect that our macaque experienced new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation, a condition that is commonly observed in human transplant patients but not well described in NHP. To our knowledge, this report represents the first documented case of new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation in a cynomolgus macaque.Abbreviations: NODAT, new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantationNew-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT, formerly known as posttransplantation diabetes mellitus) is an important consequence of solid-organ transplantation in humans.^{7-10,15,17,19,21,25-28,31,33,34,37,38,42} A variety of risk factors have been identified including increased age, sex (male prevalence), elevated pretransplant fasting plasma glucose levels, and immunosuppressive therapy.^{7-10,15,17,19,21,25-28,31,33,34,37,38,42} The relationship between calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus and cyclosporin, and the development of NODAT is widely recognized in human medicine.^{7-10,15,17,19,21,25-28,31,33,34,37,38,42} Cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fasicularis) are a commonly used NHP model in organ transplantation research. Cases of natural and induced diabetes of cynomolgus monkeys have been described in the literature;^14,43,45 however, NODAT in a macaque model of solid-organ transplantation has not been reported previously to our knowledge.     

Induction of COX-2-PGE2 synthesis by activation of the MAPK/ERK pathway contributes to neuronal death triggered by TDP-43-depleted microglia

Neuroinflammation is a striking hallmark of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and other neurodegenerative disorders. Previous studies have shown the contribution of glial cells such as astrocytes in TDP-43-linked ALS. However, the role of microglia in TDP-43-mediated motor neuron degeneration remains poorly understood. In this study, we show that depletion of TDP-43 in microglia, but not in astrocytes, strikingly upregulates cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production through the activation of MAPK/ERK signaling and initiates neurotoxicity. Moreover, we find that administration of celecoxib, a specific COX-2 inhibitor, greatly diminishes the neurotoxicity triggered by TDP-43-depleted microglia. Taken together, our results reveal a previously unrecognized non-cell-autonomous mechanism in TDP-43-mediated neurodegeneration, identifying COX-2-PGE2 as the molecular events of microglia- but not astrocyte-initiated neurotoxicity and identifying celecoxib as a novel potential therapy for TDP-43-linked ALS and possibly other types of ALS.Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an adult-onset neurodegenerative disease characterized by the degeneration of motor neurons in the brain and spinal cord.¹ Most cases of ALS are sporadic, but 10% are familial. Familial ALS cases are associated with mutations in genes such as Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TARDBP) and, most recently discovered, C9orf72. Currently, most available information obtained from ALS research is based on the study of SOD1, but new studies focusing on TARDBP and C9orf72 have come to the forefront of ALS research.^{1, 2} The discovery of the central role of the protein TDP-43, encoded by TARDBP, in ALS was a breakthrough in ALS research.^{3, 4, 5} Although pathogenic mutations of TDP-43 are genetically rare, abnormal TDP-43 function is thought to be associated with the majority of ALS cases.¹ TDP-43 was identified as a key component of the ubiquitin-positive inclusions in most ALS patients and also in other neurodegenerative diseases such as frontotemporal lobar degeneration,^{6, 7} Alzheimer''s disease (AD)^{8, 9} and Parkinson''s disease (PD).^{10, 11} TDP-43 is a multifunctional RNA binding protein, and loss-of-function of TDP-43 has been increasingly recognized as a key contributor in TDP-43-mediated pathogenesis.^{5, 12, 13, 14}Neuroinflammation, a striking and common hallmark involved in many neurodegenerative diseases, including ALS, is characterized by extensive activation of glial cells including microglia, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes.^{15, 16} Although numerous studies have focused on the intrinsic properties of motor neurons in ALS, a large amount of evidence showed that glial cells, such as astrocytes and microglia, could have critical roles in SOD1-mediated motor neuron degeneration and ALS progression,^{17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22} indicating the importance of non-cell-autonomous toxicity in SOD1-mediated ALS pathogenesis.Very interestingly, a vital insight of neuroinflammation research in ALS was generated by the evidence that both the mRNA and protein levels of the pro-inflammatory enzyme cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) are upregulated in both transgenic mouse models and in human postmortem brain and spinal cord.^{23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29} The role of COX-2 neurotoxicity in ALS and other neurodegenerative disorders has been well explored.^{30, 31, 32} One of the key downstream products of COX-2, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), can directly mediate COX-2 neurotoxicity both in vitro and in vivo.^{33, 34, 35, 36, 37} The levels of COX-2 expression and PGE2 production are controlled by multiple cell signaling pathways, including the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/ERK pathway,^{38, 39, 40} and they have been found to be increased in neurodegenerative diseases including AD, PD and ALS.^{25, 28, 32, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46} Importantly, COX-2 inhibitors such as celecoxib exhibited significant neuroprotective effects and prolonged survival or delayed disease onset in a SOD1-ALS transgenic mouse model through the downregulation of PGE2 release.²⁸Most recent studies have tried to elucidate the role of glial cells in neurotoxicity using TDP-43-ALS models, which are considered to be helpful for better understanding the disease mechanisms.^{47, 48, 49, 50, 51} Although the contribution of glial cells to TDP-43-mediated motor neuron degeneration is now well supported, this model does not fully suggest an astrocyte-based non-cell autonomous mechanism. For example, recent studies have shown that TDP-43-mutant astrocytes do not affect the survival of motor neurons,^{50, 51} indicating a previously unrecognized non-cell autonomous TDP-43 proteinopathy that associates with cell types other than astrocytes.Given that the role of glial cell types other than astrocytes in TDP-43-mediated neuroinflammation is still not fully understood, we aim to compare the contribution of microglia and astrocytes to neurotoxicity in a TDP-43 loss-of-function model. Here, we show that TDP-43 has a dominant role in promoting COX-2-PGE2 production through the MAPK/ERK pathway in primary cultured microglia, but not in primary cultured astrocytes. Our study suggests that overproduction of PGE2 in microglia is a novel molecular mechanism underlying neurotoxicity in TDP-43-linked ALS. Moreover, our data identify celecoxib as a new potential effective treatment of TDP-43-linked ALS and possibly other types of ALS.     

The Fcp1-Wee1-Cdk1 axis affects spindle assembly checkpoint robustness and sensitivity to antimicrotubule cancer drugs

To grant faithful chromosome segregation, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays mitosis exit until mitotic spindle assembly. An exceedingly prolonged mitosis, however, promotes cell death and by this means antimicrotubule cancer drugs (AMCDs), that impair spindle assembly, are believed to kill cancer cells. Despite malformed spindles, cancer cells can, however, slip through SAC, exit mitosis prematurely and resist killing. We show here that the Fcp1 phosphatase and Wee1, the cyclin B-dependent kinase (cdk) 1 inhibitory kinase, play a role for this slippage/resistance mechanism. During AMCD-induced prolonged mitosis, Fcp1-dependent Wee1 reactivation lowered cdk1 activity, weakening SAC-dependent mitotic arrest and leading to mitosis exit and survival. Conversely, genetic or chemical Wee1 inhibition strengthened the SAC, further extended mitosis, reduced antiapoptotic protein Mcl-1 to a minimum and potentiated killing in several, AMCD-treated cancer cell lines and primary human adult lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Thus, the Fcp1-Wee1-Cdk1 (FWC) axis affects SAC robustness and AMCDs sensitivity.The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays mitosis exit to coordinate anaphase onset with spindle assembly. To this end, SAC inhibits the ubiquitin ligase Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) to prevent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor securin and cyclin B, the major mitotic cyclin B-dependent kinase 1 (cdk1) activator, until spindle assembly.¹ However, by yet poorly understood mechanisms, exceedingly prolonging mitosis translates into cell death induction.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Although mechanistic details are still missing on how activation of cell death pathways is linked to mitosis duration, prolongation of mitosis appears crucial for the ability of antimicrotubule cancer drugs (AMCDs) to kill cancer cells.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} These drugs, targeting microtubules, impede mitotic spindle assembly and delay mitosis exit by chronically activating the SAC. Use of these drugs is limited, however, by toxicity and resistance. A major mechanism for resistance is believed to reside in the ability of cancer cells to slip through the SAC and exit mitosis prematurely despite malformed spindles, thus resisting killing by limiting mitosis duration.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Under the AMCD treatment, cells either die in mitosis or exit mitosis, slipping through the SAC, without or abnormally dividing.^{2, 3, 4} Cells that exit mitosis either die at later stages or survive and stop dividing or proliferate, giving rise to resistance.^{2, 3, 4} Apart from a role for p53, what dictates cell fate is still unknown; however, it appears that the longer mitosis is protracted, the higher the chances for cell death pathway activation are.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}Although SAC is not required per se for killing,⁶ preventing SAC adaptation should improve the efficacy of AMCD by increasing mitosis duration.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Therefore, further understanding of the mechanisms by which cells override SAC may help to improve the current AMCD therapy. Several kinases are known to activate and sustain SAC, and cdk1 itself appears to be of primary relevance.^{1, 8, 9} By studying mitosis exit and SAC resolution, we recently reported a role for the Fcp1 phosphatase to bring about cdk1 inactivation.^{10, 11} Among Fcp1 targets, we identified cyclin degradation pathway components, such as Cdc20, an APC/C co-activator, USP44, a deubiquitinating enzyme, and Wee1.^{10, 11} Wee1 is a crucial kinase that controls the G2 phase by performing inhibitory phosphorylation of cdk1 at tyr-15 (Y15-cdk1). Wee1 is also in a feedback relationship with cdk1 itself that, in turn, can phosphorylate and inhibit Wee1 in an autoamplification loop to promote the G2-to-M phase transition.¹² At mitosis exit, Fcp1 dephosphorylated Wee1 at threonine 239, a cdk1-dependent inhibitory phosphorylation, to dampen down the cdk1 autoamplification loop, and Cdc20 and USP44, to promote APC/C-dependent cyclin B degradation.^{10, 11, 12} In this study we analysed the Fcp1 relevance in SAC adaptation and AMCD sensitivity.     

Plasma membrane poration by opioid neuropeptides: a possible mechanism of pathological signal transduction

Neuropeptides induce signal transduction across the plasma membrane by acting through cell-surface receptors. The dynorphins, endogenous ligands for opioid receptors, are an exception; they also produce non-receptor-mediated effects causing pain and neurodegeneration. To understand non-receptor mechanism(s), we examined interactions of dynorphins with plasma membrane. Using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and patch-clamp electrophysiology, we demonstrate that dynorphins accumulate in the membrane and induce a continuum of transient increases in ionic conductance. This phenomenon is consistent with stochastic formation of giant (~2.7 nm estimated diameter) unstructured non-ion-selective membrane pores. The potency of dynorphins to porate the plasma membrane correlates with their pathogenic effects in cellular and animal models. Membrane poration by dynorphins may represent a mechanism of pathological signal transduction. Persistent neuronal excitation by this mechanism may lead to profound neuropathological alterations, including neurodegeneration and cell death.Neuropeptides are the largest and most diverse family of neurotransmitters. They are released from axon terminals and dendrites, diffuse to pre- or postsynaptic neuronal structures and activate membrane G-protein-coupled receptors. Prodynorphin (PDYN)-derived opioid peptides including dynorphin A (Dyn A), dynorphin B (Dyn B) and big dynorphin (Big Dyn) consisting of Dyn A and Dyn B are endogenous ligands for the κ-opioid receptor. Acting through this receptor, dynorphins regulate processing of pain and emotions, memory acquisition and modulate reward induced by addictive substances.^{1, 2, 3, 4} Furthermore, dynorphins may produce robust cellular and behavioral effects that are not mediated through opioid receptors.^{5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29} As evident from pharmacological, morphological, genetic and human neuropathological studies, these effects are generally pathological, including cell death, neurodegeneration, neurological dysfunctions and chronic pain. Big Dyn is the most active pathogenic peptide, which is about 10- to 100-fold more potent than Dyn A, whereas Dyn B does not produce non-opioid effects.^{16, 17, 22, 25} Big Dyn enhances activity of acid-sensing ion channel-1a (ASIC1a) and potentiates ASIC1a-mediated cell death in nanomolar concentrations^{30, 31} and, when administered intrathecally, induces characteristic nociceptive behavior at femtomolar doses.^{17, 22} Inhibition of endogenous Big Dyn degradation results in pathological pain, whereas prodynorphin (Pdyn) knockout mice do not maintain neuropathic pain.^{22, 32} Big Dyn differs from its constituents Dyn A and Dyn B in its unique pattern of non-opioid memory-enhancing, locomotor- and anxiolytic-like effects.²⁵Pathological role of dynorphins is emphasized by the identification of PDYN missense mutations that cause profound neurodegeneration in the human brain underlying the SCA23 (spinocerebellar ataxia type 23), a very rare dominantly inherited neurodegenerative disorder.^{27, 33} Most PDYN mutations are located in the Big Dyn domain, demonstrating its critical role in neurodegeneration. PDYN mutations result in marked elevation in dynorphin levels and increase in its pathogenic non-opioid activity.^{27, 34} Dominant-negative pathogenic effects of dynorphins are not produced through opioid receptors.ASIC1a, glutamate NMDA (N-methyl-d-aspartate) and AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid)/kainate ion channels, and melanocortin and bradykinin B2 receptors have all been implicated as non-opioid dynorphin targets.^{5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 30, 31, 35, 36} Multiplicity of these targets and their association with the cellular membrane suggest that their activation is a secondary event triggered by a primary interaction of dynorphins with the membrane. Dynorphins are among the most basic neuropeptides.^{37, 38} The basic nature is also a general property of anti-microbial peptides (AMPs) and amyloid peptides that act by inducing membrane perturbations, altering membrane curvature and causing pore formation that disrupts membrane-associated processes including ion fluxes across the membrane.³⁹ The similarity between dynorphins and these two peptide groups in overall charge and size suggests a similar mode of their interactions with membranes.In this study, we dissect the interactions of dynorphins with the cell membrane, the primary event in their non-receptor actions. Using fluorescence imaging, correlation spectroscopy and patch-clamp techniques, we demonstrate that dynorphin peptides accumulate in the plasma membrane in live cells and cause a profound transient increase in cell membrane conductance. Membrane poration by endogenous neuropeptides may represent a novel mechanism of signal transduction in the brain. This mechanism may underlie effects of dynorphins under pathological conditions including chronic pain and tissue injury.     

A cellular screen identifies ponatinib and pazopanib as inhibitors of necroptosis

Necroptosis is a form of regulated necrotic cell death mediated by receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) and RIPK3. Necroptotic cell death contributes to the pathophysiology of several disorders involving tissue damage, including myocardial infarction, stroke and ischemia-reperfusion injury. However, no inhibitors of necroptosis are currently in clinical use. Here we performed a phenotypic screen for small-molecule inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)-induced necroptosis in Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD)-deficient Jurkat cells using a representative panel of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs. We identified two anti-cancer agents, ponatinib and pazopanib, as submicromolar inhibitors of necroptosis. Both compounds inhibited necroptotic cell death induced by various cell death receptor ligands in human cells, while not protecting from apoptosis. Ponatinib and pazopanib abrogated phosphorylation of mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL) upon TNF-α-induced necroptosis, indicating that both agents target a component upstream of MLKL. An unbiased chemical proteomic approach determined the cellular target spectrum of ponatinib, revealing key members of the necroptosis signaling pathway. We validated RIPK1, RIPK3 and transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) as novel, direct targets of ponatinib by using competitive binding, cellular thermal shift and recombinant kinase assays. Ponatinib inhibited both RIPK1 and RIPK3, while pazopanib preferentially targeted RIPK1. The identification of the FDA-approved drugs ponatinib and pazopanib as cellular inhibitors of necroptosis highlights them as potentially interesting for the treatment of pathologies caused or aggravated by necroptotic cell death.Programmed cell death has a crucial role in a variety of biological processes ranging from normal tissue development to diverse pathological conditions.^{1, 2} Necroptosis is a form of regulated cell death that has been shown to occur during pathogen infection or sterile injury-induced inflammation in conditions where apoptosis signaling is compromised.^{3, 4, 5, 6} Given that many viruses have developed strategies to circumvent apoptotic cell death, necroptosis constitutes an important, pro-inflammatory back-up mechanism that limits viral spread in vivo.^{7, 8, 9} In contrast, in the context of sterile inflammation, necroptotic cell death contributes to disease pathology, outlining potential benefits of therapeutic intervention.¹⁰ Necroptosis can be initiated by death receptors of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily,¹¹ Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3),¹² TLR4,¹³ DNA-dependent activator of IFN-regulatory factors¹⁴ or interferon receptors.¹⁵ Downstream signaling is subsequently conveyed via RIPK1¹⁶ or TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β,^{8, 17} and converges on RIPK3-mediated^{13, 18, 19, 20} activation of MLKL.²¹ Phosphorylated MLKL triggers membrane rupture,^{22, 23, 24, 25, 26} releasing pro-inflammatory cellular contents to the extracellular space.²⁷ Studies using the RIPK1 inhibitor necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) ²⁸ or RIPK3-deficient mice have established a role for necroptosis in the pathophysiology of pancreatitis,¹⁹ artherosclerosis,²⁹ retinal cell death,³⁰ ischemic organ damage and ischemia-reperfusion injury in both the kidney³¹ and the heart.³² Moreover, allografts from RIPK3-deficient mice are better protected from rejection, suggesting necroptosis inhibition as a therapeutic option to improve transplant outcome.³³ Besides Nec-1, several tool compounds inhibiting different pathway members have been described,^{12, 16, 21, 34, 35} however, no inhibitors of necroptosis are available for clinical use so far.^{2, 10} In this study we screened a library of FDA approved drugs for the precise purpose of identifying already existing and generally safe chemical agents that could be used as necroptosis inhibitors. We identified the two structurally distinct kinase inhibitors pazopanib and ponatinib as potent blockers of necroptosis targeting the key enzymes RIPK1/3.     

Protein kinase D1/2 is involved in the maturation of multivesicular bodies and secretion of exosomes in T and B lymphocytes

Multivesicular bodies (MVBs) are endocytic compartments that enclose intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) formed by inward budding from the limiting membrane of endosomes. In T lymphocytes, these ILV contain Fas ligand (FasL) and are secreted as ''lethal exosomes'' following activation-induced fusion of the MVB with the plasma membrane. Diacylglycerol (DAG) and diacylglycerol kinase α (DGKα) regulate MVB maturation and polarized traffic, as well as subsequent secretion of pro-apoptotic exosomes, but the molecular basis underlying these phenomena remains unclear. Here we identify protein kinase D (PKD) family members as DAG effectors involved in MVB genesis and secretion. We show that the inducible secretion of exosomes is enhanced when a constitutively active PKD1 mutant is expressed in T lymphocytes, whereas exosome secretion is impaired in PKD2-deficient mouse T lymphoblasts and in PKD1/3-null B cells. Analysis of PKD2-deficient T lymphoblasts showed the presence of large, immature MVB-like vesicles and demonstrated defects in cytotoxic activity and in activation-induced cell death. Using pharmacological and genetic tools, we show that DGKα regulates PKD1/2 subcellular localization and activation. Our studies demonstrate that PKD1/2 is a key regulator of MVB maturation and exosome secretion, and constitutes a mediator of the DGKα effect on MVB secretory traffic.Exosomes are nanovesicles that form as intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) inside multivesicular bodies (MVBs) and are then secreted by numerous cell types.¹ ILVs are generated by inward budding of late endosome limiting membrane in a precisely regulated maturation process.^{2, 3} Two main pathways are involved in MVB maturation.^{4, 5} In addition to the ESCRT (endosomal complex required for traffic) proteins,⁶ there is increasing evidence that lipids such as lyso-bisphosphatidic acid (LBPA),⁷ ceramides⁸ and diacylglycerol (DAG)⁹ contribute to this membrane invagination process.Exosomes participate in many biological processes related to T-cell receptor (TCR)-triggered immune responses, including T lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity and activation-induced cell death (AICD), antigen presentation and intercellular miRNA exchange.^{10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15} The discovery of exosome involvement in these responses increased interest in the regulation of exosome biogenesis and secretory traffic, with special attention to the contribution of lipids such as ceramide and DAG, as well as DAG-binding proteins.^{14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21} These studies suggest that positive and negative DAG regulators may control secretory traffic. By transforming DAG into phosphatidic acid (PA), diacylglycerol kinase α (DGKα) is essential for the negative control of DAG function in T lymphocytes.²² DGKα translocates transiently to the T-cell membrane after human muscarinic type 1 receptor (HM1R) triggering or to the immune synapse (IS) after TCR stimulation; at these subcellular locations, DGKα acts as a negative modulator of phospholipase C (PLC)-generated DAG.^{23, 24}The secretory vesicle pathway involves several DAG-controlled checkpoints at which DGKα may act; these include vesicle formation and fission at the trans-Golgi network (TGN), MVB maturation, as well as their transport, docking and fusion to the plasma membrane.^{9, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20} The molecular components that regulate some of these trafficking processes include protein kinase D (PKD) family members.²¹ PKD1 activity, for instance, regulates fission of transport vesicles from TGN via direct interaction with the pre-existing DAG pool at this site.¹⁹ The cytosolic serine/threonine kinases PKD1, PKD2 and PKD3^{(ref. 21)} are expressed in a wide range of cells, with PKD2 the most abundant isotype in T lymphocytes.^{25, 26} PKD have two DAG-binding domains (C1a and C1b) at the N terminus,²¹ which mediate PKD recruitment to cell membranes. Protein kinase C (PKC) phosphorylation at the PKD activation loop further promotes PKD autophosphorylation and activation.²⁷Based on our previous studies showing DGKα regulation of DAG in MVB formation and exosome secretion,^{9, 14, 28} and the identification of PKD1/2 association to MVB,¹⁴ we hypothesized that DGKα control of DAG mediates these events, at least in part, through PKD. Here we explored whether, in addition to its role in vesicle fission from TGN,¹⁹ PKD regulates other steps in the DAG-controlled secretory traffic pathway. Using PKD-deficient cell models, we analyzed the role of PKD1/2 in MVB formation and function, and demonstrate their implication in exosome secretory traffic.     

The LRRK2 inhibitor GSK2578215A induces protective autophagy in SH-SY5Y cells: involvement of Drp-1-mediated mitochondrial fission and mitochondrial-derived ROS signaling

Mutations in the leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) gene have been associated with Parkinson''s disease, and its inhibition opens potential new therapeutic options. Among the drug inhibitors of both wild-type and mutant LRRK2 forms is the 2-arylmethyloxy-5-subtitutent-N-arylbenzamide GSK257815A. Using the well-established dopaminergic cell culture model SH-SY5Y, we have investigated the effects of GSK2578215A on crucial neurodegenerative features such as mitochondrial dynamics and autophagy. GSK2578215A induces mitochondrial fragmentation of an early step preceding autophagy. This increase in autophagosome results from inhibition of fusion rather than increases in synthesis. The observed effects were shared with LRRK2-IN-1, a well-described, structurally distinct kinase inhibitor compound or when knocking down LRRK2 expression using siRNA. Studies using the drug mitochondrial division inhibitor 1 indicated that translocation of the dynamin-related protein-1 has a relevant role in this process. In addition, autophagic inhibitors revealed the participation of autophagy as a cytoprotective response by removing damaged mitochondria. GSK2578215A induced oxidative stress as evidenced by the accumulation of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal in SH-SY5Y cells. The mitochondrial-targeted reactive oxygen species scavenger MitoQ positioned these species as second messengers between mitochondrial morphologic alterations and autophagy. Altogether, our results demonstrated the relevance of LRRK2 in mitochondrial-activated pathways mediating in autophagy and cell fate, crucial features in neurodegenerative diseases.Nowadays, Parkinson''s disease (PD) constitutes the main motor disorder and the second neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer''s disease. Etiology of PD remains unknown, but both environmental and genetic factors have been implicated. Among the genes associated with PD is the leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2, PARK8, OMIM 607060) encoding gene encoded by PARK8. Indeed, LRRK2 mutations have been described in a substantial number of idiopathic late-onset PD patients without a known family history of the disease.^{1, 2, 3}The physiologic function remains unknown. It localizes in the cytosol as well as in specific membrane subdomains, including mitochondria, autophagosomes and autolysosomes,⁴ and interacts with a whole array of proteins, including both α- and β-tubulin,^{5, 6} tau,⁷ α-synuclein⁸ and F-actin.⁹ LRRK2 gene mutations, including the most common G2019S,³ are associated with increases in toxic putative kinase activity.^{1, 10} LRRK2 overexpression is toxic to cultured cells,^{11, 12} and LRRK2 loss did not cause neurodegenerative changes (for a review see Tong and Shen¹³). However, LRRK2 transgenic mice lack obvious PD-like behavioral phenotypes.¹⁴ LRRK2-associated PD patients show degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra.¹⁵ Data from our own group and others have associated mitochondrial apoptotical pathways with PD,^{16, 17, 18} and, in this context, LRRK2 mutant-mediated toxicity could be due to mitochondria-dependent apoptosis.¹⁹ There is considerable evidence for impaired mitochondrial function and morphology in both early-onset, autosomal recessive inherited PD and late-onset sporadic PD.Mitochondrial dynamics include several mechanisms, such as fission, fusion and mitophagy.^{20, 21} Altered fission/fusion dynamics might be a common pathogenic pathway of neurodegenerative diseases. It is well documented that mitochondrial dynamics constitute a relevant issue in some experimental neurodegenerative models.^{20, 22, 23, 24, 25} Mitochondrial dynamics is tightly regulated by cellular pathways including those participated by the dynamin-related protein-1 (Drp1). Drp1 mostly locates in the cytoplasm, but is stimulated after fission stimuli to migrate to the mitochondria. Once there, Drp1 forms ring-like structures, which wrap around the scission site to constrict the mitochondrial membrane resulting in mitochondrial fission.^{26, 27} Interestingly, a functional interaction between PD-associated LRRK2 and members of the dynamin GTPase superfamily has been described.²⁸Macroautophagy (hereafter referred to as autophagy) is an active cellular response, which functions in the intracellular degradation system of cellular debris such as damaged organelles. Whether autophagy promotes cell death or enhances survival is still controversial.^{29, 30} It requires the formation of autophagosomes where cellular content is to be degraded by the action of lysosomal enzymatic content. Autophagosome formation is regulated by an orderly action of >30 autophagy-related (Atg) proteins. Among them is the microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 (LC3), a homolog of Apg8p, which is essential for autophagy in yeast and is associated with autophagosome membranes.³¹ Interestingly, these vesicles are mostly highly mobile in the cytoplasm.³² Wild-type and mutant LRRK2 expression has been related to autophagy.^{4, 33, 34, 35, 36} Reactive oxygen species (ROS) function as relevant second messengers after several stimuli, including mitochondrial disruption. Exacerbated ROS increases might result in overactivation of antioxidant systems and yield harmful oxidative stress. Among oxidative stress hallmarks is the accumulation of α,β-unsaturated hydroxyalkenal 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (4-HNE), whose accumulation has been reported in PD post-mortem patient brains,^{37, 38} thus giving a significant relevance to ROS in the pathogenesis of PD.All these results indicate LRRK2 as a promising pharmacologic target in PD treatment.³⁹ Several LRRK2 inhibitor drugs have been synthetized, such as the potent and highly selective 2-arylmethyloxy-5-substitutent-N-arylbenzamide (GSK2578215A). GSK2578215A exhibits biochemical IC₅₀s of 10.9 nM against wild-type LRRK2, and possesses a high ratio of brain to plasma distribution.⁴⁰ This study provides key insights into the mechanisms downstream of LRRK2 inhibition, and spreads light onto an underexplored, yet potentially tractable therapeutic target for treating LRRK2-associated PD. We demonstrate how inhibition of this kinase results in the activation of cellular death pathways such as the mitochondrial fission machinery, and how cells reply by activating a protective autophagic response. Our results show the presence of oxidative stress hallmarks, thus pointing to a key function for ROS, placed downstream of mitochondrial fission.     

Distinct roles of RIP1–RIP3 hetero- and RIP3–RIP3 homo-interaction in mediating necroptosis

Necroptosis is mediated by a signaling complex called necrosome, containing receptor-interacting protein (RIP)1, RIP3, and mixed-lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL). It is known that RIP1 and RIP3 form heterodimeric filamentous scaffold in necrosomes through their RIP homotypic interaction motif (RHIM) domain-mediated oligomerization, but the signaling events based on this scaffold has not been fully addressed. By using inducible dimer systems we found that RIP1–RIP1 interaction is dispensable for necroptosis; RIP1–RIP3 interaction is required for necroptosis signaling, but there is no necroptosis if no additional RIP3 protein is recruited to the RIP1–RIP3 heterodimer, and the interaction with RIP1 promotes the RIP3 to recruit other RIP3; RIP3–RIP3 interaction is required for necroptosis and RIP3–RIP3 dimerization is sufficient to induce necroptosis; and RIP3 dimer-induced necroptosis requires MLKL. We further show that RIP3 oligomer is not more potent than RIP3 dimer in triggering necroptosis, suggesting that RIP3 homo-interaction in the complex, rather than whether RIP3 has formed homo polymer, is important for necroptosis. RIP3 dimerization leads to RIP3 intramolecule autophosphorylation, which is required for the recruitment of MLKL. Interestingly, phosphorylation of one of RIP3 in the dimer is sufficient to induce necroptosis. As RIP1–RIP3 heterodimer itself cannot induce necroptosis, the RIP1–RIP3 heterodimeric amyloid fibril is unlikely to directly propagate necroptosis. We propose that the signaling events after the RIP1–RIP3 amyloid complex assembly are the recruitment of free RIP3 by the RIP3 in the amyloid scaffold followed by autophosphorylation of RIP3 and subsequent recruitment of MLKL by RIP3 to execute necroptosis.Necroptosis is a type of programmed necrosis characterized by necrotic morphological changes, including cellular organelle swelling, cell membrane rupture,^{1, 2, 3} and dependence of receptor-interacting protein (RIP)1⁴ and RIP3.^{5, 6, 7} Physiological function of necroptosis has been illustrated in host defense,^{8, 9, 10, 11} inflammation,^{12, 13, 14, 15, 16} tissue injury,^{10, 17, 18} and development.^{19, 20, 21}Necroptosis can be induced by a number of different extracellular stimuli such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF). TNF stimulation leads to formation of TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1) signaling complex (named complex I), and complex II containing RIP1, TRADD, FAS-associated protein with a death domain (FADD), and caspase-8, of which the activation initiates apoptosis. If cells have high level of RIP3, RIP1 recruits RIP3 to form necrosome containing FADD,^{22, 23, 24} caspase-8, RIP1, and RIP3, and the cells undergo necroptosis.^{25, 26} Caspase-8 and FADD negatively regulates necroptosis,^{27, 28, 29, 30} because RIP1, RIP3, and CYLD are potential substrates of caspase-8.^{31, 32, 33, 34} Necrosome also suppresses apoptosis but the underlying mechanism has not been described yet. Mixed-lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL) is downstream of RIP3,^{35, 36} and phosphorylation of MLKL is required for necroptosis.^{37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42}Apoptosis inducing complex (complex II) and necrosome are both supramolecular complexes.^{43, 44, 45} A recent study showed that RIP1 and RIP3 form amyloidal fibrils through their RIP homotypic interaction motif⁴⁶ (RHIM)-mediated polymerization, and suggested that amyloidal structure is essential for necroptosis signaling.⁴⁷ The RIP1–RIP3 heterodimeric amyloid complex is believed to function as a scaffold that brings signaling proteins into proximity to permit their activation. However, RIP1 and RIP3 also can each form fibrils on their own RHIM domains in vitro. It is unclear how the homo- and hetero-interactions are coordinated and organized on the amyloid scaffold to execute their functions in necroptosis. Here, we used inducible dimerization systems to study the roles of RIP1–RIP1, RIP1–RIP3, and RIP3–RIP3 interactions in necroptosis signaling. Our data suggested that it is the RIP1–RIP3 interaction in the RIP1–RIP3 heterodimeric amyloid complex that empowers to recruit other free RIP3; homodimerization of RIP3 triggers its autophosphorylation and only the phosphorylated RIP3 can recruit MLKL to execute necroptosis.     

Adiponectin receptor-mediated signaling ameliorates cerebral cell damage and regulates the neurogenesis of neural stem cells at high glucose concentrations: an in vivo and in vitro study

In the central nervous system (CNS), hyperglycemia leads to neuronal damage and cognitive decline. Recent research has focused on revealing alterations in the brain in hyperglycemia and finding therapeutic solutions for alleviating the hyperglycemia-induced cognitive dysfunction. Adiponectin is a protein hormone with a major regulatory role in diabetes and obesity; however, its role in the CNS has not been studied yet. Although the presence of adiponectin receptors has been reported in the CNS, adiponectin receptor-mediated signaling in the CNS has not been investigated. In the present study, we investigated adiponectin receptor (AdipoR)-mediated signaling in vivo using a high-fat diet and in vitro using neural stem cells (NSCs). We showed that AdipoR1 protects cell damage and synaptic dysfunction in the mouse brain in hyperglycemia. At high glucose concentrations in vitro, AdipoR1 regulated the survival of NSCs through the p53/p21 pathway and the proliferation- and differentiation-related factors of NSCs via tailless (TLX). Hence, we suggest that further investigations are necessary to understand the cerebral AdipoR1-mediated signaling in hyperglycemic conditions, because the modulation of AdipoR1 might alleviate hyperglycemia-induced neuropathogenesis.Adiponectin secreted by the adipose tissue^{1, 2} exists in either a full-length or globular form.^{3, 4, 5, 6} Adiponectin can cross the blood–brain barrier, and various forms of adiponectin are found in the cerebrospinal fluid.^{7, 8, 9, 10, 11} Adiponectin exerts its effect by binding to the adiponectin receptor 1 (AdipoR1) and adiponectin receptor 2 (AdipoR2)^{12, 13} that have different affinities for the various circulating adiponectins.^{12, 14, 15, 16, 17} Several studies reported that both receptor subtypes are expressed in the central nervous system (CNS).^{7, 12, 18} As adiponectin modulates insulin sensitivity and inflammation,¹⁹ its deficiency induces insulin resistance and glucose intolerance in animals fed a high-fat diet (HFD).^{19, 20, 21} In addition, adiponectin can ameliorate the glucose homeostasis and increase insulin sensitivity.^{22, 23, 24} Adiponectin, which is the most well-known adipokine, acts mainly as an anti-inflammatory regulator,^{25, 26} and is associated with the onset of neurological disorders.²⁷ In addition, a recent study reported that adiponectin promotes the proliferation of hippocampal neural stem cells (NSCs).²⁸ Considering that adiponectin acts by binding to the adiponectin receptors, investigation of the adiponectin receptor-mediated signaling in the brain is crucial to understand the cerebral effects of adiponectin and the underlying cellular mechanisms.The prevalence of type II diabetes mellitus (DM2) and Alzheimer''s disease increases with aging.²⁹ According to a cross-sectional study, in people with DM2, the risk of dementia is 2.5 times higher than that in the normal population.^{30, 31} A study performed between 1980 and 2002 suggested that an elevated blood glucose level is associated with a greater risk for dementia in elderly patients with DM2.³² In addition, according to a 9-year-long longitudinal cohort study, the risk of developing Alzheimer''s disease was 65% higher in people with diabetes than in control subjects.³³ A community-based cohort study also reported that higher plasma glucose concentrations are associated with an increased risk for dementia, because the higher glucose level has detrimental effects on the brain.³¹ High blood glucose level causes mitochondria-dependent apoptosis,^{34, 35, 36} and aggravates diverse neurological functions.^{37, 38} Inflammation and oxidative stress, which are commonly observed in people with diabetes, inhibit neurogenesis.^{39, 40, 41} Similarly, neurogenesis is decreased in mice and rats with genetically induced type I diabetes.^{42, 43} In addition, diabetic rodents have a decreased proliferation rate of neural progenitors.^{43, 44} Furthermore, several studies suggested that an HFD leads to neuroinflammation, the impairment of synaptic plasticity, and cognitive decline.^{45, 46}Here, we investigated whether AdipoR1-mediated signaling is associated with cell death in the brain of mice on a HFD, and whether high glucose level modifies the proliferation and differentiation capacity of NSCs in vitro. Our study provides novel findings about the role of AdipoR1-mediated signaling in hyperglycemia-induced neuropathogenesis.     

Comparison of Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress and Cardiovascular Disease in Humans and Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)

In the oxidative stress hypothesis of aging, the aging process is the result of cumulative damage by reactive oxygen species. Humans and chimpanzees are remarkably similar; but humans live twice as long as chimpanzees and therefore are believed to age at a slower rate. The purpose of this study was to compare biomarkers for cardiovascular disease, oxidative stress, and aging between male chimpanzees and humans. Compared with men, male chimpanzees were at increased risk for cardiovascular disease because of their significantly higher levels of fibrinogen, IGF1, insulin, lipoprotein a, and large high-density lipoproteins. Chimpanzees showed increased oxidative stress, measured as significantly higher levels of 5-hydroxymethyl-2-deoxyuridine and 8-iso-prostaglandin F_2α, a higher peroxidizability index, and higher levels of the prooxidants ceruloplasmin and copper. In addition, chimpanzees had decreased levels of antioxidants, including α- and β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, lycopene, and tocopherols, as well as decreased levels of the cardiovascular protection factors albumin and bilirubin. As predicted by the oxidative stress hypothesis of aging, male chimpanzees exhibit higher levels of oxidative stress and a much higher risk for cardiovascular disease, particularly cardiomyopathy, compared with men of equivalent age. Given these results, we hypothesize that the longer lifespan of humans is at least in part the result of greater antioxidant capacity and lower risk of cardiovascular disease associated with lower oxidative stress.Abbreviations: 5OHmU, 5-hydroxymethyl-2-deoxyuridine; 8isoPGF_2α, 8-iso-prostaglandin F_2α; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; IGF1, insulin-like growth factor 1; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; ROS, reactive oxygen speciesAging is characterized as a progressive reduction in the capacity to withstand the stresses of everyday life and a corresponding increase in risk of mortality. According to the oxidative stress hypothesis of aging, much of the aging process can be accounted for as the result of cumulative damage produced by reactive oxygen species (ROS).^{6,21,28,41,97} Endogenous oxygen radicals (that is, ROS) are generated as a byproduct of normal metabolic reactions in the body and subsequently can cause extensive damage to proteins, lipids, and DNA.^6,41 Various prooxidant elements, in particular free transition metals, can catalyze these destructive reactions.⁶ The damage caused by ROS can be counteracted by antioxidant defense systems, but the imbalance between production of ROS and antioxidant defenses, over time, leads to oxidative stress and may contribute to the rate of aging.^28,97Oxidative stress has been linked to several age-related diseases including neurodegenerative diseases, ophthalmologic diseases, cancer, and cardiovascular disease.^21,28,97 Of these, cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of adult death in the United States and Europe.⁷¹ In terms of cardiovascular disease, oxidative stress has been linked to atherosclerosis, hypertension, cardiomyopathy, and chronic heart failure in humans.^55,78,84 Increases in oxidant catalysts (prooxidants)—such as copper, iron, and cadmium—have been associated with hypertension, coronary artery disease, atherosclerosis, and sudden cardiac death.^98,102,106 Finally, both endogenous and exogenous antioxidants have been linked to decreased risk of cardiovascular disease, although the mechanisms behind this relationship are unclear.^11,52,53 However, the oxidative stress hypothesis of aging aims to explain not only the mechanism of aging and age-related diseases (such as cardiovascular disease) in humans but also the differences between aging rates and the manifestations of age-related diseases across species.The differences in antioxidant and ROS levels between animals and humans offer promise for increasing our understanding of human aging. Additional evidence supporting the oxidative stress hypothesis of aging has come from comparative studies linking differences in aging rates across taxa with both antioxidant and ROS levels.^{4,17-21,58,71,86,105} In mammals, maximum lifespan potential is positively correlated with both serum and tissue antioxidant levels.^{17,18,21,71,105} Research has consistently demonstrated that the rate of oxidative damage varies across species and is negatively correlated with maximum lifespan potential.^{4,19,20,58,71,86} However, few studies involved detailed comparisons of hypothesized biochemical indicators of aging and oxidative stress between humans and animals.⁶ This type of interspecies comparison has great potential for directly testing the oxidative stress hypothesis of aging.Much evolutionary and genetic evidence supports remarkable similarity between humans and chimpanzees.^95,100 Despite this similarity, humans have a lifespan of almost twice that of chimpanzees.^3,16,47 Most comparative primate aging research has focused on the use of a macaque model,^62,81,88 and several biochemical markers of age-related diseases have been identified in both humans and macaque monkeys.^{9,22,28,81,93,97} Several other species of monkeys have also been used in research addressing oxidative stress, antioxidant defenses, and maximum lifespan potential.^18,21,58,105 However, no study to date has examined biochemical indicators of oxidative stress and aging in chimpanzees and humans as a test of the oxidative stress hypothesis for aging. The purpose of this study is to compare biochemical markers for cardiovascular disease, oxidative stress, and aging directly between male chimpanzees and humans. Given the oxidative stress hypothesis for aging and the known role of oxidative stress in cardiovascular disease, we predict that chimpanzees will show higher levels of cardiovascular risk and oxidative stress than humans.     

Spontaneous Osteoblastic Osteosarcoma in a Mongolian Gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus)

Spontaneous neoplasms in Mongolian gerbils have an incidence of 20% to 26.8%, but osteosarcomas occur at a much lower rate. Here we report a 1-y-old Mongolian gerbil with a spontaneous osteosarcoma at the level of the proximal tibia, with metastases to the pectoral muscles and lungs. Grossly, the tibial mass obliterated the tibia and adjacent muscles, and an axillary mass with a bloody, cavitary center expanded the pectoral muscles. Microscopically, the tibial mass was an infiltrative, osteoblastic mesenchymal neoplasm, and the axillary mass was an anaplastic mesenchymal neoplasm with hemorrhage. The lung contained multiple metastatic foci. Immunohistochemistry for osteonectin was strongly positive in the tibial, axillary, and pulmonary metastases. Although osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone neoplasm that occurs spontaneously in all laboratory and domestic animal species and humans, it arises less frequently than does other neoplasms. The current case of spontaneous osteoblastic osteosarcoma of the proximal tibia and metastases to the pectoral muscles and lung in a Mongolian gerbil is similar in presentation, histology, and predilection site of both osteoblastic and telangiectatic osteosarcomas in humans. In addition, this case is an unusual manifestation of osteosarcoma in the appendicular skeleton of a Mongolian gerbil.Mongolian gerbils are used frequently in biologic research,^{1,2,4,9,10,12-14} particularly in oncogenic studies and filariasis research studying Brugia malayi.² There have been several reports^{1,6,10,11,13-15} of spontaneous neoplasms, particularly in gerbils 2 y of age and older, typically occurring with the highest incidences in the skin, reproductive tract, and adrenal glands; however, neoplasms have also been reported in the thyroid, thymus, liver, kidney, pancreas, and bone.^{1,6,10,11,13-15} The incidence of spontaneous neoplasms occurring in the subfamily Gerbillinae ranges from 20% to 26.8%,^{1,6,10,11,13-15} depending on the study, age, and sex of the animals.With a lower incidence than those reported for other neoplasms, osteosarcomas in gerbils have been described in the ramus of the mandible and as an extraskeletal mass throughout the peritoneum.^10,11 The usual age of onset for osteosarcomas in Mongolian gerbils is approximately 3 y (36 to 39 mo); however, no tumor type has been reported at less than 2 y of age in this species.^10,11 Here we report a spontaneous osteosarcoma that occurred at the level of the proximal tibia, with metastases to the pectoral muscles and lung, in a 1-y-old Mongolian gerbil.     

TRAF2 is a biologically important necroptosis suppressor

Tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) triggers necroptotic cell death through an intracellular signaling complex containing receptor-interacting protein kinase (RIPK) 1 and RIPK3, called the necrosome. RIPK1 phosphorylates RIPK3, which phosphorylates the pseudokinase mixed lineage kinase-domain-like (MLKL)—driving its oligomerization and membrane-disrupting necroptotic activity. Here, we show that TNF receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2)—previously implicated in apoptosis suppression—also inhibits necroptotic signaling by TNFα. TRAF2 disruption in mouse fibroblasts augmented TNFα–driven necrosome formation and RIPK3-MLKL association, promoting necroptosis. TRAF2 constitutively associated with MLKL, whereas TNFα reversed this via cylindromatosis-dependent TRAF2 deubiquitination. Ectopic interaction of TRAF2 and MLKL required the C-terminal portion but not the N-terminal, RING, or CIM region of TRAF2. Induced TRAF2 knockout (KO) in adult mice caused rapid lethality, in conjunction with increased hepatic necrosome assembly. By contrast, TRAF2 KO on a RIPK3 KO background caused delayed mortality, in concert with elevated intestinal caspase-8 protein and activity. Combined injection of TNFR1-Fc, Fas-Fc and DR5-Fc decoys prevented death upon TRAF2 KO. However, Fas-Fc and DR5-Fc were ineffective, whereas TNFR1-Fc and interferon α receptor (IFNAR1)-Fc were partially protective against lethality upon combined TRAF2 and RIPK3 KO. These results identify TRAF2 as an important biological suppressor of necroptosis in vitro and in vivo.Apoptotic cell death is mediated by caspases and has distinct morphological features, including membrane blebbing, cell shrinkage and nuclear fragmentation.^{1, 2, 3, 4} In contrast, necroptotic cell death is caspase-independent and is characterized by loss of membrane integrity, cell swelling and implosion.^{1, 2, 5} Nevertheless, necroptosis is a highly regulated process, requiring activation of RIPK1 and RIPK3, which form the core necrosome complex.^{1, 2, 5} Necrosome assembly can be induced via specific death receptors or toll-like receptors, among other modules.^{6, 7, 8, 9} The activated necrosome engages MLKL by RIPK3-mediated phosphorylation.^{6, 10, 11} MLKL then oligomerizes and binds to membrane phospholipids, forming pores that cause necroptotic cell death.^{10, 12, 13, 14, 15} Unchecked necroptosis disrupts embryonic development in mice and contributes to several human diseases.^{7, 8, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22}The apoptotic mediators FADD, caspase-8 and cFLIP suppress necroptosis.^{19, 20, 21, 23, 24} Elimination of any of these genes in mice causes embryonic lethality, subverted by additional deletion of RIPK3 or MLKL.^{19, 20, 21, 25} Necroptosis is also regulated at the level of RIPK1. Whereas TNFα engagement of TNFR1 leads to K63-linked ubiquitination of RIPK1 by cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (cIAPs) to promote nuclear factor (NF)-κB activation,²⁶ necroptosis requires suppression or reversal of this modification to allow RIPK1 autophosphorylation and consequent RIPK3 activation.^{2, 23, 27, 28} CYLD promotes necroptotic signaling by deubiquitinating RIPK1, augmenting its interaction with RIPK3.²⁹ Conversely, caspase-8-mediated CYLD cleavage inhibits necroptosis.²⁴TRAF2 recruits cIAPs to the TNFα-TNFR1 signaling complex, facilitating NF-κB activation.^{30, 31, 32, 33} TRAF2 also supports K48-linked ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of death-receptor-activated caspase-8, curbing apoptosis.³⁴ TRAF2 KO mice display embryonic lethality; some survive through birth but have severe developmental and immune deficiencies and die prematurely.^{35, 36} Conditional TRAF2 KO leads to rapid intestinal inflammation and mortality.³⁷ Furthermore, hepatic TRAF2 depletion augments apoptosis activation via Fas/CD95.³⁴ TRAF2 attenuates necroptosis induction in vitro by the death ligands Apo2L/TRAIL and Fas/CD95L.³⁸ However, it remains unclear whether TRAF2 regulates TNFα-induced necroptosis—and if so—how. Our present findings reveal that TRAF2 inhibits TNFα necroptotic signaling. Furthermore, our results establish TRAF2 as a biologically important necroptosis suppressor in vitro and in vivo and provide initial insight into the mechanisms underlying this function.