Degradation of the Endoplasmic Reticulum by Autophagy during Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Arabidopsis

In this article, we show that the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in Arabidopsis thaliana undergoes morphological changes in structure during ER stress that can be attributed to autophagy. ER stress agents trigger autophagy as demonstrated by increased production of autophagosomes. In response to ER stress, a soluble ER marker localizes to autophagosomes and accumulates in the vacuole upon inhibition of vacuolar proteases. Membrane lamellae decorated with ribosomes were observed inside autophagic bodies, demonstrating that portions of the ER are delivered to the vacuole by autophagy during ER stress. In addition, an ER stress sensor, INOSITOL-REQUIRING ENZYME-1b (IRE1b), was found to be required for ER stress–induced autophagy. However, the IRE1b splicing target, bZIP60, did not seem to be involved, suggesting the existence of an undiscovered signaling pathway to regulate ER stress–induced autophagy in plants. Together, these results suggest that autophagy serves as a pathway for the turnover of ER membrane and its contents in response to ER stress in plants.     

Arabidopsis Class I α-Mannosidases MNS4 and MNS5 Are Involved in Endoplasmic Reticulum–Associated Degradation of Misfolded Glycoproteins

To ensure that aberrantly folded proteins are cleared from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), all eukaryotic cells possess a mechanism known as endoplasmic reticulum–associated degradation (ERAD). Many secretory proteins are N-glycosylated, and despite some recent progress, little is known about the mechanism that selects misfolded glycoproteins for degradation in plants. Here, we investigated the role of Arabidopsis thaliana class I α-mannosidases (MNS1 to MNS5) in glycan-dependent ERAD. Our genetic and biochemical data show that the two ER-resident proteins MNS4 and MNS5 are involved in the degradation of misfolded variants of the heavily glycosylated brassinosteroid receptor, BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1, while MNS1 to MNS3 appear dispensable for this ERAD process. By contrast, N-glycan analysis of different mns mutant combinations revealed that MNS4 and MNS5 are not involved in regular N-glycan processing of properly folded secretory glycoproteins. Overexpression of MNS4 or MNS5 together with ER-retained glycoproteins indicates further that both enzymes can convert Glc_0-1Man_8-9GlcNAc₂ into N-glycans with a terminal α1,6-linked Man residue in the C-branch. Thus, MNS4 and MNS5 function in the formation of unique N-glycan structures that are specifically recognized by other components of the ERAD machinery, which ultimately results in the disposal of misfolded glycoproteins.     

Structural Characterization of Arabidopsis Leaf Arabinogalactan Polysaccharides

Proteins decorated with arabinogalactan (AG) have important roles in cell wall structure and plant development, yet the structure and biosynthesis of this polysaccharide are poorly understood. To facilitate the analysis of biosynthetic mutants, water-extractable arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs) were isolated from the leaves of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants and the structure of the AG carbohydrate component was studied. Enzymes able to hydrolyze specifically AG were utilized to release AG oligosaccharides. The released oligosaccharides were characterized by high-energy matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-collision-induced dissociation mass spectrometry and polysaccharide analysis by carbohydrate gel electrophoresis. The Arabidopsis AG is composed of a β-(1→3)-galactan backbone with β-(1→6)-d-galactan side chains. The β-(1→6)-galactan side chains vary in length from one to over 20 galactosyl residues, and they are partly substituted with single α-(1→3)-l-arabinofuranosyl residues. Additionally, a substantial proportion of the β-(1→6)-galactan side chain oligosaccharides are substituted at the nonreducing termini with single 4-O-methyl-glucuronosyl residues via β-(1→6)-linkages. The β-(1→6)-galactan side chains are occasionally substituted with α-l-fucosyl. In the fucose-deficient murus1 mutant, AGPs lack these fucose modifications. This work demonstrates that Arabidopsis mutants in AGP structure can be identified and characterized. The detailed structural elucidation of the AG polysaccharides from the leaves of Arabidopsis is essential for insights into the structure-function relationships of these molecules and will assist studies on their biosynthesis.Arabinogalactans (AGs) are structurally complex large-branched polysaccharides attached to Hyp residues of many plant cell wall polypeptides. Most proteins glycosylated with AGs (AGPs) have both AG glycosylated domains (glycomodules) and structural or enzymatic domains. However, typical AGPs commonly contain less than 10% protein, suggesting that the AG is the functional part of the molecule (Clarke et al., 1979; Fincher et al., 1983; Kieliszewski and Lamport, 1994; Borner et al., 2003; Xu et al., 2008). Hyp is the most characteristic amino acid present at the glycosylated domain of the AGP, but other amino acids such as Ser, Ala, and Thr are also very common. Type II AG polysaccharides share common structural features based on a β-(1→3)-galactan backbone with β-(1→6)-linked galactan side chains and can be found both on AGPs and rhamnogalacturonan-I (RG-I) pectin (Renard et al., 1991). The galactopyranosyl (Galp) residues can be further substituted with l-arabinofuranosyl (l-Araf) and occasionally also l-rhamnosyl (l-Rha), l-fucosyl (l-Fuc), and glucuronosyl (GlcA; with or without 4-O-methylation) residues (Tsumuraya et al., 1988; Tan et al., 2004; Tryfona et al., 2010). (Sugars mentioned in this work belong to the D-series unless otherwise stated.)The structure of AGs is poorly characterized, and this is mainly due to the great heterogeneity of glycan structures, not only between different AGPs but also even on the same peptide sequence in the same tissue (Estévez et al., 2006). The glycan structure can also be different depending on the developmental stage and tissue type (Tsumuraya et al., 1988), adding to the great heterogeneity of these molecules and therefore limiting their detailed characterization. Molecular and biochemical evidence has indicated that AGPs have specific functions during root formation, promotion of somatic embryogenesis (van Hengel et al., 2002), and attraction of pollen tubes to the style (Cheung et al., 1995). In addition, enhanced secretion efficiency or stability in the cell wall are properties that the AG may confer on the glycosylated protein (Borner et al., 2003). However, it has been difficult to differentiate one species of AGP from another in plant tissues and to assign specific roles to individual AGPs.l-Fuc is present in AGPs in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; van Hengel et al., 2002), radish (Raphanus sativus; Nakamura et al., 1984; Tsumuraya et al., 1984a, 1984b, 1988), and several other dicot plants such as thyme (Thymus vulgaris; Chun et al., 2001) and celery (Apium graveolens; Lin et al., 2011). Reduction in l-Fuc by 40% in roots of murus1 (mur1) plants resulted in a decrease of 50% in root cell elongation, and eel lectin binding assays suggested that the phenotype was the result of alterations in the composition of root AGPs (van Hengel and Roberts, 2002). An α-(1→2)-fucosyltransferase (FUT) activity for radish primary root AGPs has been described, where an α-l-Araf-(1→3)-β-Galp-(1→6)-Galp trisaccharide was used as exogenous substrate acceptor to mimic an AG polysaccharide in the enzymatic assay (Misawa et al., 1996). Linkage analysis, reactivity with eel lectin, and digestion with α-(1→2)-fucosidase indicated that the l-Fuc residues added are terminal and attached via an α-linkage to the C-2 position of an adjacent l-Araf residue (Nakamura et al., 1984; Tsumuraya et al., 1984a, 1984b, 1988). Recently, Wu et al. (2010) identified AtFUT4 and AtFUT6 genes encoding FUT proteins specific to AGPs, but the structures of the fucosylated AG generated have not been fully characterized.To gain insights into the synthesis and function of plant AGPs, it would be useful to have mutants altered in their carbohydrate moieties. However, no AG-specific biosynthetic mutants have been characterized, and this, among other reasons, is due to the very limited knowledge of the structure of Arabidopsis AGs (Qu et al., 2008). Moreover, characterization of AG in candidate mutants remains challenging. Even though the structures of some AGs have been proposed using NMR and sugar linkage analyses, the complete structural elucidation of a native AG still remains a formidable task, because NMR spectroscopy and methylation analysis have been largely used to provide information regarding the amount and type of linkages between adjacent glycosyl residues, and AG heterogeneity can confound attempts to build complete structural models. Recently, a modular structure was proposed for AGs on heterologously expressed proteins in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum; Tan et al., 2010). Tan et al. (2010) proposed that approximately 15-residue repeating blocks of decorated β-(1→3)-trigalactosyl subunits connected by β-(1→6)-linkages were the building blocks of type II AG polysaccharides and concluded that these molecules are far less complex than commonly supposed. Most characterized β-(1→6)-galactan side chains in AGs are reported to be short, of one or two residues (Neukom and Markwalder, 1975; Gane et al., 1995; Gaspar et al., 2001). On the contrary, there are reports of long β-(1→6)-galactan side chains in radish root AGPs (Haque et al., 2005). Similarly, we recently found evidence that wheat (Triticum aestivum) flour endosperm AGP extracts contained long β-(1→6)-galactan side chains heavily substituted with l-Araf at C-3 (Tryfona et al., 2010). This partial structure of the carbohydrate component of wheat flour AGP isolated from water extracts of wheat endosperm was elucidated utilizing a combination of analytical approaches, such as the use of enzymes able to release oligosaccharides specifically from AGs, high-energy matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI)-collision-induced dissociation (CID) mass spectrometry (MS), and polysaccharide analysis by carbohydrate gel electrophoresis (PACE; Tryfona et al., 2010). In this work, we applied these techniques to study the carbohydrate component of Arabidopsis leaf AGPs. AG-specific enzyme digestion products were analyzed by PACE and MS, allowing a partial structure to be proposed. We show that endogenous Arabidopsis leaf AG is composed of a β-(1→3)-galactan backbone with β-(1→6)-galactan side chains. These side chains are substituted with l-Araf residues via α-(1→3)-linkages and can vary in length from one up to at least 20 Galp residues. We also found that the β-(1→6)-galactan side chains are substituted mainly with 4-O-methyl-glucuronosyl (4-O-Me-GlcA) at their nonreducing termini, while occasional l-Fuc substitutions were also present via α-(1→2)-linkages on l-Araf residues. In addition, AG oligosaccharides from leaves of the mur1 mutant were identified, and their structures were compared with those isolated from wild-type plants.     

Comparing the in Vivo Function of α-Carboxysomes and β-Carboxysomes in Two Model Cyanobacteria

The carbon dioxide (CO₂)-concentrating mechanism of cyanobacteria is characterized by the occurrence of Rubisco-containing microcompartments called carboxysomes within cells. The encapsulation of Rubisco allows for high-CO₂ concentrations at the site of fixation, providing an advantage in low-CO₂ environments. Cyanobacteria with Form-IA Rubisco contain α-carboxysomes, and cyanobacteria with Form-IB Rubisco contain β-carboxysomes. The two carboxysome types have arisen through convergent evolution, and α-cyanobacteria and β-cyanobacteria occupy different ecological niches. Here, we present, to our knowledge, the first direct comparison of the carboxysome function from α-cyanobacteria (Cyanobium spp. PCC7001) and β-cyanobacteria (Synechococcus spp. PCC7942) with similar inorganic carbon (C_i; as CO₂ and HCO₃⁻) transporter systems. Despite evolutionary and structural differences between α-carboxysomes and β-carboxysomes, we found that the two strains are remarkably similar in many physiological parameters, particularly the response of photosynthesis to light and external C_i and their modulation of internal ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate, phosphoglycerate, and C_i pools when grown under comparable conditions. In addition, the different Rubisco forms present in each carboxysome had almost identical kinetic parameters. The conclusions indicate that the possession of different carboxysome types does not significantly influence the physiological function of these species and that similar carboxysome function may be possessed by each carboxysome type. Interestingly, both carboxysome types showed a response to cytosolic C_i, which is of higher affinity than predicted by current models, being saturated by 5 to 15 mm C_i. This finding has bearing on the viability of transplanting functional carboxysomes into the C₃ chloroplast.Cyanobacteria inhabit a diverse range of ecological habitats, including both freshwater and marine ecosystems. The flexibility to occupy these different habitats is thought to come in part from the carbon-concentrating mechanism (CCM) present in all species (Badger et al., 2006). The CCM comprises inorganic carbon (C_i; as carbon dioxide [CO₂] and HCO₃⁻) transporters for C_i uptake and protein microbodies called carboxysomes for CO₂ concentration and fixation by Rubisco (Badger and Price, 2003). The CCM is believed to have evolved in response to changes in the absolute and relative levels of CO₂ and oxygen (O₂) in the atmosphere during the evolution of oxygenic photosynthesis in cyanobacteria (Price et al., 2008).There are two main phylogenetic groups within the cyanobacteria based on Rubisco and carboxysome phylogenies; α-cyanobacteria have α-carboxysomes with Form-IA Rubisco, whereas β-cyanobacteria have β-carboxysomes with Form-IB Rubisco (Tabita, 1999; Badger et al., 2002). Rubisco large subunit protein sequences from these two groups are closely related but nevertheless, distinguishable (Supplemental Fig. S1). In general, α-cyanobacteria and β-cyanobacteria occupy a quite different range of ecological habitats. The α-cyanobacteria are mostly marine organisms, with the majority of species living in the open ocean (Badger et al., 2006). Marine α-cyanobacteria live in very stable environments with high pH (pH 8.2) and dissolved carbon levels but low nutrients. They are characterized by small cells, very small genomes (1.6–2.8 Mb), and a few constitutively expressed carbon uptake transporters (Rae et al., 2011; Beck et al., 2012). They have been described as low flux, low energy cyanobacteria with a minimal CCM (Badger et al., 2006). Although these species are slow growing, oceanic cyanobacteria contribute as much as one-half of oceanic primary productivity (Liu et al., 1997, 1999; Field et al., 1998), suggesting that they may contribute up to 25% to net global productivity every year.In comparison, β-cyanobacteria occupy a much more diverse range of habitats, including freshwater, estuarine, and hot springs and never reach the same levels of global abundance (Badger et al., 2006). They are characterized by larger cells, larger genomes (2.2–3.6 Mb), and an array of carbon uptake transporters, including those transporters induced under low C_i (Rae et al., 2011, 2013). In addition to these broadly defined α-groups and β-groups, there are small numbers of α-cyanobacteria that have been termed transitional strains (Price, 2011; Rae et al., 2011). These species (e.g. Cyanobium spp. PCC7001, Synechococcus spp. WH5701, and Cyanobium spp. PCC6307; Supplemental Fig. S1) live in marginal marine and freshwater environments and have a number of characteristics similar to β-cyanobacteria. For example, they have a more diverse range of C_i uptake systems and a significantly larger genome than closely related α-cyanobacteria, and it has been suggested that the additional genes encoding transport systems were acquired by horizontal gene transfer (HGT) from β-cyanobacteria (Rae et al., 2011).Although the carboxysomes from α-cyanobacteria and β-cyanobacteria are very similar in overall structure, in that they share an outer protein shell of common phylogenetic origin (Kerfeld et al., 2005), they are distinguished from each other largely by differences in the proteins, which seem to make up or interact with the interior of the carboxysome compartment (Supplemental Table S1). This finding suggests that their different structures today have arisen through periods of common and convergent evolution. Certain carboxysome shell proteins from α-carboxysomes and β-carboxysomes show regions of significant sequence homology. These proteins are denoted as CsoS1 to CsoS4 (in α-cyanobacteria) and CcmKLO (in β-cyanobacteria), and the homologous regions have been termed bacterial microcompartment domains (Kerfeld et al., 2010; Rae et al., 2013). Proteins with these domains are also found in bacterial microcompartments in proteobacteria. However, other identified carboxysome proteins do not show any sequence homology between α-carboxysomes and β-carboxysomes but may perform similar functional roles. For example, carbonic anhydrase activity is essential for carboxysome function, but its activity seems to be provided by a range of different proteins (β-CcaA, β-CcmM, and α-CsoSCA; Kupriyanova et al., 2013). Similarly, β-CcmM and α-CsoS2 could play similar roles in organizing the interface between the shell and Rubisco within the carboxysomes (Gonzales et al., 2005; Long et al., 2007).The functioning of a carboxysome relies on a number of biochemical properties associated with the protein microbody structure. These properties include the biochemical/kinetic properties of Rubisco contained within carboxysomes, the conductance of the carboxysome shell to the influx of substrate ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) and the efflux of the carboxylation product phosphoglycerate (PGA), the conductance of the shell to the influx of bicarbonate and the efflux of CO₂, and lastly, the manner in which bicarbonate is converted to CO₂ within the carboxysomes. α-Carboxysomes and β-carboxysomes have the potential to differ in each of these properties. The flux of phosphorylated sugars across the shell has been postulated to be mediated by the pores in the hexameric shell proteins (Yeates et al., 2010; Kinney et al., 2011), which although similar, do differ between the two carboxysomes types. Bicarbonate and CO₂ uptake processes are less well-defined but probably involve aspects of the way in which unique shell interface proteins interact with Rubisco, which also differs in that CsoS2 and CsoSCA are probably the interacting proteins involved in α-carboxysomes (Espie and Kimber, 2011), whereas CcmM and β-carboxysomal CA are variably involved in β-carboxysomes (Long et al., 2010). Finally, the Form-IA and Form-IB Rubisco proteins at the heart of carboxylation, although similar, have the potential to show different kinetic properties. Although Form-IB Rubiscos from β-cyanobacteria are well-characterized, the Form-IA counterparts have received very little attention. In addition, the CCM of very few strains of cyanobacteria have been studied at the level of biochemistry and physiology, and they have been almost exclusively β-cyanobacteria. As a result, there are significant gaps in our knowledge about the similarities and differences in functional traits between α-cyanobacterial and β-cyanobacterial strains. One important question that remains to be answered is whether α-carboxysomes and β-carboxysomes have intrinsic differences in their biochemical properties that influence the nature of the CCM, which is established within each broad cell type.Because of the difficulties in isolating and assaying intact carboxysomes in vitro, the characterization of biochemical properties of carboxysomes is not easily addressed. One way forward is to study the properties of the CCM in detail in a model representative strain from each group and compare their characteristics to contrast the intracellular function of α-cell types and β-cell types. In the past, it has been restricted because of the difficulties in growing many of the open ocean α-cyanobacteria and their very different natures in relation to inorganic transporter composition. However, the availability of α-cyanobacteria transition strains, which grow well in the laboratory, has provided an opportunity to address this question. The α-cyanobacteria Cyanobium spp. PCC7001 (hereafter Cyanobium spp.), in particular, grows in standard freshwater media (BG11) and has growth and photosynthetic performance properties that closely match the model β-cyanobacteria, Synechococcus spp. PCC7942 (hereafter Synechococcus spp.); for this reason, Cyanobium spp. is ideal for a balanced comparison of the in vivo physiological properties of α-carboxysomes and β-carboxysomes in two species with relatively similar C_i-uptake properties.Genome analysis of both strains indicates that Cyanobium spp. have many of the same carbon uptake systems present in Synechococcus spp. (Rae et al., 2011). In using two strains with such similar transport capacities, we aimed to shed light on aspects of the functional properties of carboxysomes in each strain and how these properties affect the operation of the CCM in α-cyanobacteria and β-cyanobacteria. Using both membrane inlet mass spectrometry (MIMS) and silicon oil centrifugation, we investigated C_i pool sizes and CO₂ uptake rates in both species for cells grown at high and low CO₂. Comparative Rubisco properties and photosynthetic rates of each species were determined, and intracellular pools of RuBP and PGA were measured. In addition, we characterized a number of cellular properties to determine differences in the biochemical environments in which each carboxysome type exists. Together, the results provide a unique functional comparison of two distinct carboxysome types from phylogenetically disparate cyanobacteria.     

Microtubules Contribute to Tubule Elongation and Anchoring of Endoplasmic Reticulum,Resulting in High Network Complexity in Arabidopsis

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a network of tubules and sheet-like structures in eukaryotic cells. Some ER tubules dynamically change their morphology, and others form stable structures. In plants, it has been thought that the ER tubule extension is driven by the actin-myosin machinery. Here, we show that microtubules also contribute to the ER tubule extension with an almost 20-fold slower rate than the actin filament-based ER extension. Treatment with the actin-depolymerizing drug Latrunculin B made it possible to visualize the slow extension of the ER tubules in transgenic Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants expressing ER-targeted green fluorescent protein. The ER tubules elongated along microtubules in both directions of microtubules, which have a distinct polarity. This feature is similar to the kinesin- or dynein-driven ER tubule extension in animal cells. In contrast to the animal case, ER tubules elongating with the growing microtubule ends were not observed in Arabidopsis. We also found the spots where microtubules are stably colocalized with the ER subdomains during long observations of 1,040 s, suggesting that cortical microtubules contribute to provide ER anchoring points. The anchoring points acted as the branching points of the ER tubules, resulting in the formation of multiway junctions. The density of the ER tubule junction positively correlated with the microtubule density in both elongating cells and mature cells of leaf epidermis, showing the requirement of microtubules for formation of the complex ER network. Taken together, our findings show that plants use microtubules for ER anchoring and ER tubule extension, which establish fine network structures of the ER within the cell.The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a complex network composed of tubules and sheet structures. The ER network’s morphology changes dynamically by elongation and shrinkage of tubules, sheet expansion, and sliding junctions. For example, an ER tubule elongates straight forward from a cisterna and subsequently, fuses to another cisterna, producing a linkage between two cisternae. If an elongating tubule fails to fuse to another cisterna, the tubule contracts into the original cisterna. However, the ER has stable anchoring points that associate with other cellular structures, such as the plasma membrane or cytoskeleton. When an elongating ER tubule reaches an association point, it forms a stable ER anchor (i.e. establishment of the ER anchoring points forms stable ER tubules). Hence, increasing the number of ER anchoring points produces fine ER meshwork.ER dynamics in eukaryotes depend on the cytoskeleton. In plants, major contributors for ER organization are actin filaments (Quader et al., 1989; Knebel et al., 1990; Lichtscheidl and Hepler, 1996; Sparkes et al., 2009a) and the actin-associated motor proteins (myosins; Prokhnevsky et al., 2008; Peremyslov et al., 2010; Ueda et al., 2010). However, it had generally been thought that microtubules are not involved in ER organization in plants, because microtubule-depolymerizing drugs do not induce obvious changes in the ER network (Quader et al., 1989; Knebel et al., 1990; Lichtscheidl and Hepler, 1996; Sparkes et al., 2009a). Nevertheless, involvement of microtubules in plant ER organization has been suspected from several electron microscopy observations that showed microtubules located close to the ER membrane in Vicia faba guard cells, Nicotiana alata pollen tubes, and Funaria hygrometrica caulonemata (Lancelle et al., 1987; Hepler et al., 1990; McCauley and Hepler, 1992).Foissner et al. (2009) have suggested that microtubules are involved in motility and orientation of cortical ER in Characean algae (Nitella translucens, Nitella flexilis, Nitella hyalina, and Nitella pseudoflabellata) internodal cells. Characean cortical ER is spatially separated from inner cytoplasmic streaming by the middle layer of fixed chloroplasts. The cortical ER forms a tight meshwork of predominantly transverse ER tubules that frequently coalign with microtubules, and microtubule depolymerization reduces the transverse ER tubules and increases mesh size (Foissner et al., 2009). Consistently, Hamada et al. (2012) have shown in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) that microtubule depolymerization increases mesh size in young elongating cells. In addition, stable ER tubule junctions are often colocalized with cortical microtubules (Hamada et al., 2012), suggesting that microtubules stabilize ER tubule junctions to form fine ER meshes. Oryzalin-induced ER nodulation (Langhans et al., 2009) was not observed in our experimental conditions.Here, we showed that ER tubules elongate along microtubules in plant cells. In addition, we revealed that the ER is stably anchored to defined points on cortical microtubules. The stable anchoring points are the basis of various ER shapes, such as three-way, two-way, or dead-end ER tubules. These microtubule-ER interactions, together with the actin-myosin system, contribute to ER network organization.     

Cytoplasmic Nucleation and Atypical Branching Nucleation Generate Endoplasmic Microtubules in Physcomitrella patens

The mechanism underlying microtubule (MT) generation in plants has been primarily studied using the cortical MT array, in which fixed-angled branching nucleation and katanin-dependent MT severing predominate. However, little is known about MT generation in the endoplasm. Here, we explored the mechanism of endoplasmic MT generation in protonemal cells of Physcomitrella patens. We developed an assay that utilizes flow cell and oblique illumination fluorescence microscopy, which allowed visualization and quantification of individual MT dynamics. MT severing was infrequently observed, and disruption of katanin did not severely affect MT generation. Branching nucleation was observed, but it showed markedly variable branch angles and was occasionally accompanied by the transport of nucleated MTs. Cytoplasmic nucleation at seemingly random locations was most frequently observed and predominated when depolymerized MTs were regrown. The MT nucleator γ-tubulin was detected at the majority of the nucleation sites, at which a single MT was generated in random directions. When γ-tubulin was knocked down, MT generation was significantly delayed in the regrowth assay. However, nucleation occurred at a normal frequency in steady state, suggesting the presence of a γ-tubulin-independent backup mechanism. Thus, endoplasmic MTs in this cell type are generated in a less ordered manner, showing a broader spectrum of nucleation mechanisms in plants.     

Origin of β-Carotene-Rich Plastoglobuli in Dunaliella bardawil

The halotolerant microalgae Dunaliella bardawil accumulates under nitrogen deprivation two types of lipid droplets: plastoglobuli rich in β-carotene (βC-plastoglobuli) and cytoplasmatic lipid droplets (CLDs). We describe the isolation, composition, and origin of these lipid droplets. Plastoglobuli contain β-carotene, phytoene, and galactolipids missing in CLDs. The two preparations contain different lipid-associated proteins: major lipid droplet protein in CLD and the Prorich carotene globule protein in βC-plastoglobuli. The compositions of triglyceride (TAG) molecular species, total fatty acids, and sn-1+3 and sn-2 positions in the two lipid pools are similar, except for a small increase in palmitic acid in plastoglobuli, suggesting a common origin. The formation of CLD TAG precedes that of βC-plastoglobuli, reaching a maximum after 48 h of nitrogen deprivation and then decreasing. Palmitic acid incorporation kinetics indicated that, at early stages of nitrogen deprivation, CLD TAG is synthesized mostly from newly formed fatty acids, whereas in βC-plastoglobuli, a large part of TAG is produced from fatty acids of preformed membrane lipids. Electron microscopic analyses revealed that CLDs adhere to chloroplast envelope membranes concomitant with appearance of small βC-plastoglobuli within the chloroplast. Based on these results, we propose that CLDs in D. bardawil are produced in the endoplasmatic reticulum, whereas βC-plastoglobuli are made, in part, from hydrolysis of chloroplast membrane lipids and in part, by a continual transfer of TAG or fatty acids derived from CLD.Eukaryotic cells accumulate neutral lipids in different tissues mainly in the form of lipid droplets (Murphy, 2012). Most lipid droplets consist of a core of triglycerides (TAGs) and/or sterol esters coated by a phospholipids monolayer and embedded with proteins (Zweytick et al., 2000). Plants accumulate TAGs in different tissues, primarily in seeds but also in fruit, such as palm oil, flowers, and leaves. The best characterized system for TAG metabolism is oil seeds, in which TAG serves as the major carbon and energy reservoir to be used during germination (Huang, 1992, 1996). Recent studies show that lipid droplets are not just static pools of lipids but have diverse metabolic functions (Farese and Walther, 2009). In addition, plants also contain plastoglobuli, small chloroplastic lipid droplets consisting primarily of storage lipids and pigments. Proteome analyses of plastoglobuli suggest that they are involved in synthesis and degradation of lipids, pigments, and coenzymes (Ytterberg et al., 2006; Lundquist et al., 2012). It has been shown that plant plastoglobuli are associated with thylakoid membranes (Austin et al., 2006; Ytterberg et al., 2006).It is not entirely clear where the TAGs are synthesized in the plant cell. Until recently, it has been assumed that most TAGs are made in the endoplasmatic reticulum (ER) from fatty acids, which are mostly synthesized in the chloroplast and imported to the cytoplasm (Joyard et al., 2010). However, the recent identification of the enzyme diacylglycerol acyl transferase in plant plastoglobuli (Lundquist et al., 2012) suggests that TAG may be synthesized directly in chloroplasts, although direct evidence is missing. TAG may be synthesized also from galactolipid fatty acids during stress or senescence by phytyl ester synthases, which catalyze acyl transesterification from galactolipids to TAGs (Lippold et al., 2012). Phosphatidyl choline (PC) plays a major role in acyl transfer of newly synthesized fatty acids from the chloroplast into TAGs at the ER in plants (Bates et al., 2009). An indication for the origin of glycerolipids in plants is the identity of the fatty acids at the sn-2 position: if it originates in the chloroplast, it is mostly C16:0, whereas if it was made in the ER, it is mostly C:18 (Heinz and Roughan, 1983).Many species of unicellular microalgae can accumulate large amounts of TAGs under growth-limiting conditions, such as nitrogen deprivation (Shifrin and Chisholm, 1981; Roessler, 1990; Avron and Ben-Amotz, 1992; Thompson, 1996). In green microalgae (Chlorophyceae), TAGs are usually synthesized and accumulated in cytoplasmatic lipid droplets (CLDs; Murphy, 2012), although in some cases, such as in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii starchless mutants, they also accumulate in chloroplasts (Fan et al., 2011; Goodson et al., 2011). Recent studies indicate that the CLDs are closely associated with ER membranes and possibly, chloroplast envelope membranes as well (Goodson et al., 2011; Peled et al., 2012).Green microalgae also contain two distinct types of chloroplastic lipid droplets. The first type is plastoglobuli, similar in morphology to higher plants plastoglobuli (Bréhélin et al., 2007; Kessler and Vidi, 2007). The second type is the eyespot (stigma), part of the visual system in microalgae. The eyespot is composed of a cluster of β-carotene-containing lipid droplets organized in several layers between grana membranes in the chloroplast (Häder and Lebert, 2009; Kreimer, 2009). Recent proteomic analysis of algal eyespot proteins revealed that they contain diverse structural proteins, lipid and carotenoid metabolizing enzymes, transporters, and signal transduction components (Schmidt et al., 2006).The origin of TAG in microalgae is still not clear. In C. reinhardtii, it was found that the major fatty acids in the sn-2 position are 16:0, which according to the plant dogma, is made in the chloroplast (Fan et al., 2011). In C. reinhardtii, which lacks PC, monogalactosyldiacylglycerol (MGDG) was proposed to replace PC in the mobilization of fatty acids from plastidal galactoglycerolipids into TAG based on mutation of a galactoglycerolipid lipase (Li et al., 2012). Based on these results and others, it has been proposed that, in C. reinhardtii, triglycerides are primarily produced in the chloroplast or combined with ER (Li et al., 2012; Liu and Benning, 2013).Plants and algae lipid droplets contain structural major proteins localized at the lipid droplet periphery, and their major function seems to be stabilization and prevention of fusion (Huang, 1992, 1996; Katz et al., 1995; Frandsen et al., 2001; Liu et al., 2009). In plant seed oils, the major classes of lipid droplet proteins are oleosins and caleosins, which have a characteristic hydrophobic loop with a conserved three Pro domain (Hsieh and Huang, 2004; Capuano et al., 2007; Purkrtova et al., 2008; Tzen, 2012). Oleosin and caleosin analogs were also recently identified in some green microalgal species (Lin et al., 2012; Vieler et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2013). However, the most abundant lipid droplets proteins in green algae (Chloropyceae) are a new family of major lipid droplet proteins (MLDPs) structurally distinct from plant oleosins and caleosins (Moellering and Benning, 2010; Peled et al., 2011; Davidi et al., 2012). Plastoglobules have different major lipid-associated proteins termed plastoglobules-associated protein-fibrillins, which form a distinct protein family with no sequence or structural similarities to oleosins (Kim and Huang, 2003). We have previously identified in the plastoglobuli rich in β-carotene (βC-plastoglobuli) a lipid-associated protein termed carotene globule protein (CGP), whose degradation destabilized the lipid droplets (Katz et al., 1995). The proteome of C. reinhardtii lipid droplet indicates that algal CLDs also contain several enzymes, suggesting that they are involved in lipid metabolism (Nguyen et al., 2011).The halotolerant green algae Dunaliella bardawil and Dunaliella salina ‘Teodoresco’ are unique in that they accumulate under high light stress or nitrogen deprivation large amounts of plastidic lipid droplets (βC-plastoglobuli), which consist of TAG and two isomers of β-carotene, all trans and 9-cis (Ben-Amotz et al., 1982, 1988). D. bardawil also accumulates CLD under the same stress conditions, similar to other green algae (Davidi et al., 2012). It has been shown that the function of βC-plastoglobuli is to protect the photosynthetic system against photoinhibition (Ben-Amotz et al., 1989). The enzymatic pathway for β-carotene synthesis in D. bardawil and D. salina has been partly identified, but the subcellular localization of β-carotene biosynthesis is not known (Jin and Polle, 2009). The synthesis of β-carotene depends on TAG biosynthesis (Rabbani et al., 1998); however, the origin of βC-plastoglobuli is not known. Are they formed within the chloroplast, or are they made in the cytoplasm? Is the TAG in βC-plastoglobuli and CLD identical or different, and where is it formed?D. bardawil is an excellent model organism for isolation of lipid droplet for several reasons. First, D. bardawil contains large amounts of both CLD and βC-plastoglobuli (Ben-Amotz et al., 1982; Fried et al., 1982), making it possible to obtain sufficient amounts of proteins and lipids from the two types of lipid pools for detailed analyses. Second, Dunaliella do not have a rigid cell wall and can be lysed by a gentle osmotic shock, which does not rupture the chloroplast. Therefore, it is possible to sequentially release pure CLD and βC-plastoglobuli by a two-step lysis (Katz et al., 1995). Third, D. bardawil seems to lack the eyespot structure, which can be clearly observed in other Dunaliella spp. even in a light microscope or by electron microscopy, but has never been observed in D. bardawil by us. It avoids the risk of cross contamination of βC-plastoglobuli with eyespot proteins. Fourth, the availability of protein markers for the major lipid droplet-associated proteins, CGPs and MLDPs, enabled both good immunolocalization and careful monitoring of the purity of the preparations by western analysis.In this work, we describe the purification, lipid compositions, and protein profiles of two lipid pools from D. bardawil: CLD and plastidic βC-plastoglobuli. A detailed proteomic analysis of these lipid droplets will be described in another work. Combined with detailed electron microscopy studies, these results led to surprising conclusions regarding the origin of the plastidic βC-plastoglobuli.     

Membrane-Localized Extra-Large G Proteins and Gβγ of the Heterotrimeric G Proteins Form Functional Complexes Engaged in Plant Immunity in Arabidopsis

In animals, heterotrimeric G proteins, comprising Gα, Gβ, and Gγ subunits, are molecular switches whose function tightly depends on Gα and Gβγ interaction. Intriguingly, in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), multiple defense responses involve Gβγ, but not Gα. We report here that the Gβγ dimer directly partners with extra-large G proteins (XLGs) to mediate plant immunity. Arabidopsis mutants deficient in XLGs, Gβ, and Gγ are similarly compromised in several pathogen defense responses, including disease development and production of reactive oxygen species. Genetic analysis of double, triple, and quadruple mutants confirmed that XLGs and Gβγ functionally interact in the same defense signaling pathways. In addition, mutations in XLG2 suppressed the seedling lethal and cell death phenotypes of BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1-associated receptor kinase1-interacting receptor-like kinase1 mutants in an identical way as reported for Arabidopsis Gβ-deficient mutants. Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) three-hybrid and bimolecular fluorescent complementation assays revealed that XLG2 physically interacts with all three possible Gβγ dimers at the plasma membrane. Phylogenetic analysis indicated a close relationship between XLGs and plant Gα subunits, placing the divergence point at the dawn of land plant evolution. Based on these findings, we conclude that XLGs form functional complexes with Gβγ dimers, although the mechanism of action of these complexes, including activation/deactivation, must be radically different form the one used by the canonical Gα subunit and are not likely to share the same receptors. Accordingly, XLGs expand the repertoire of heterotrimeric G proteins in plants and reveal a higher level of diversity in heterotrimeric G protein signaling.Heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (G proteins), classically consisting of Gα, Gβ, and Gγ subunits, are essential signal transduction elements in most eukaryotes. In animals and fungi, ligand perception by G protein-coupled receptors leads to replacement of GDP with GTP in Gα, triggering activation of the heterotrimer (Li et al., 2007; Oldham and Hamm, 2008). Upon activation, GTP-bound Gα and Gβγ are released and interact with downstream effectors, thereby transmitting signals to multiple intracellular signaling cascades. Signaling terminates when the intrinsic GTPase activity of Gα hydrolyzes GTP to GDP and the inactive heterotrimer reforms at the receptor. The large diversity of mammalian Gα subunits confers specificity to the multiple signaling pathways mediated by G proteins (Wettschureck and Offermanns, 2005). Five distinct classes of Gα have been described in animals (Gαi, Gαq, Gαs, Gα12 and Gαv), with orthologs found in evolutionarily primitive organisms such as sponges (Oka et al., 2009). Humans possess four classes of Gα involving 23 functional isoforms encoded by 16 genes (McCudden et al., 2005), while only a single prototypical Gα is usually found per plant genome (Urano et al., 2013). Multiple copies of Gα are present in some species with recently duplicated genomes, such as soybean (Glycine max) with four Gα genes (Blanc and Wolfe, 2004; Bisht et al., 2011). In the model plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), a prototypical Gα subunit (GPA1) is involved in a number of important processes, including cell proliferation (Ullah et al., 2001), inhibition of inward K⁺ channels and activation of anion channels in guard cells by mediating the abscisic acid pathway (Wang et al., 2001; Coursol et al., 2003), blue light responses (Warpeha et al., 2006, 2007), and germination and postgermination development (Chen et al., 2006; Pandey et al., 2006).It is well established that heterotrimeric G proteins play a fundamental role in plant innate immunity. In Arabidopsis, two different Gβγ dimers (Gβγ1 and Gβγ2) are generally considered to be the predominant elements in G protein defense signaling against a variety of fungal pathogens (Llorente et al., 2005; Trusov et al., 2006, 2007, 2009; Delgado-Cerezo et al., 2012; Torres et al., 2013). By contrast, these studies attributed a small or no role to Gα, because mutants deficient in Gα displayed only slightly increased resistance against the fungal pathogens (Llorente et al., 2005; Trusov et al., 2006; Torres et al., 2013). The Gβγ-mediated signaling also contributes to defense against a model bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae, by participating in programmed cell death (PCD) and inducing reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in response to at least three pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs; Ishikawa, 2009; Liu et al., 2013; Torres et al., 2013). Gα is not involved in PCD or PAMP-triggered ROS production (Liu et al., 2013; Torres et al., 2013). Nonetheless, Arabidopsis Gα plays a positive role in defense against P. syringae, probably by mediating stomatal function and hence physically restricting bacterial entry to the leaf interior (Zhang et al., 2008; Zeng and He, 2010; Lee et al., 2013). Given the small contribution from Gα, the involvement of heterotrimeric G proteins in Arabidopsis resistance could be explained in two ways: either the Gβγ dimer acts independently from Gα, raising a question of how is it activated upon a pathogen attack, or Gα is replaced by another protein for heterotrimer formation.The Arabidopsis genome contains at least three genes encoding Gα-like proteins that have been classified as extra-large G proteins (XLGs; Lee and Assmann, 1999; Ding et al., 2008). XLGs comprise two structurally distinct regions. The C-terminal region is similar to the canonical Gα, containing the conserved helical and GTPase domains, while the N-terminal region is a stretch of approximately 400 amino acids including a putative nuclear localization signal (Ding et al., 2008). GTP binding and hydrolysis were confirmed for all three XLG proteins, although their enzymatic activities are very slow and require Ca²⁺ as a cofactor, whereas canonical Gα utilizes Mg²⁺ (Heo et al., 2012). Several other features differentiate XLGs from Gα subunits. Comparative analysis of XLG1 and Gα at the DNA level showed that the genes are organized in seven and 13 exons, respectively, without common splicing sites (Lee and Assmann, 1999). XLGs have been reported to localize to the nucleus (Ding et al., 2008). Analysis of knockout mutants revealed a nuclear function for XLG2, as it physically interacts with the Related To Vernalization1 (RTV1) protein, enhancing the DNA binding activity of RTV1 to floral integrator gene promoters and resulting in flowering initiation (Heo et al., 2012). Therefore, it appears that XLGs may act independently of G protein signaling. On the other hand, functional similarities between XLGs and the Arabidopsis Gβ subunit (AGB1) were also discovered. For instance, XLG3- and Gβ-deficient mutants were similarly impaired in root gravitropic responses (Pandey et al., 2008). Knockout of all three XLG genes caused increased root length, similarly to the Gβ-deficient mutant (Ding et al., 2008). Furthermore, as observed in Gβ-deficient mutants, xlg2 mutants displayed increased susceptibility to P. syringae, indicating a role in plant defense (Zhu et al., 2009). Nevertheless, a genetic analysis of the possible functional interaction between XLGs and Gβ has not been established.In this report, we performed in-depth genetic analyses to test the functional interaction between the three XLGs and Gβγ dimers during defense-related responses in Arabidopsis. We also examined physical interaction between XLG2 and the Gβγ dimers using yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) three-hybrid (Y3H) and bimolecular fluorescent complementation (BiFC) assays. Our findings indicate that XLGs function as direct partners of Gβγ dimers in plant defense signaling. To estimate relatedness of XLGs and Gα proteins, we carried out a phylogenetic analysis. Based on our findings, we conclude that plant XLG proteins most probably originated from a canonical Gα subunit and retained prototypical interaction with Gβγ dimers. They function together with Gβγ in a number of processes including plant defense, although they most probably evolved activation/deactivation mechanisms very different from those of a prototypical Gα.     

Overaccumulation of γ-Glutamylcysteine in a Jasmonate-Hypersensitive Arabidopsis Mutant Causes Jasmonate-Dependent Growth Inhibition

Glutathione (GSH) is essential for many aspects of plant biology and is associated with jasmonate signaling in stress responses. We characterized an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) jasmonate-hypersensitive mutant (jah2) with seedling root growth 100-fold more sensitive to inhibition by the hormone jasmonyl-isoleucine than the wild type. Genetic mapping and genome sequencing determined that the mutation is in intron 6 of GLUTATHIONE SYNTHETASE2, encoding the enzyme that converts γ-glutamylcysteine (γ-EC) to GSH. The level of GSH in jah2 was 71% of the wild type, while the phytoalexin-deficient2-1 (pad2-1) mutant, defective in GSH1 and having only 27% of wild-type GSH level, was not jasmonate hypersensitive. Growth defects for jah2, but not pad2, were also seen in plants grown to maturity. Surprisingly, all phenotypes in the jah2 pad2-1 double mutant were weaker than in jah2. Quantification of γ-EC indicated these defects result from hyperaccumulation of this GSH precursor by 294- and 65-fold in jah2 and the double mutant, respectively. γ-EC reportedly partially substitutes for loss of GSH, but growth inhibition seen here was likely not due to an excess of total glutathione plus γ-EC because their sum in jah2 pad2-1 was only 16% greater than in the wild type. Further, the jah2 phenotypes were lost in a jasmonic acid biosynthesis mutant background, indicating the effect of γ-EC is mediated through jasmonate signaling and not as a direct result of perturbed redox status.Glutathione (GSH) is an essential thiol of most higher organisms, including plants. Primarily found in the reduced form, its roles in maintaining a reduced intracellular state are numerous and well characterized (Foyer and Noctor, 2011; Noctor et al., 2011). Additionally, GSH is involved in detoxifying reactive oxygen species, heavy metal detoxification through phytochelatins, elimination of xenobiotics, and signaling of plant development and stress responses (Rouhier et al., 2008).GSH is synthesized in two steps. The first links Cys to the γ-carboxyl group of Glu through an amide bond catalyzed by γ-glutamylcysteine (γ-EC) synthetase, encoded by the single gene GSH1 in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). Gly is then added by GSH synthetase (GSH-S), also encoded by a single gene (GSH2). GSH is typically present at millimolar levels in plants, and although γ-EC is normally present at only a few percent of this amount, there is evidence that γ-EC has redox activities in Arabidopsis (Pasternak et al., 2008).Insertional knockouts of GSH1 are embryo lethal, and rootmeristemless1, with only 5% of wild-type GSH level, lacks a root apical meristem due to cell cycle arrest (Vernoux et al., 2000; Cairns et al., 2006). Other mutants producing 25% to 50% of wild-type GSH levels grow normally but exhibit defects under various stress conditions. For example, phytoalexin-deficient2-1 (pad2-1) and cadmium sensitive2 mutants are susceptible to pathogens and hypersensitive to Cd, respectively, while regulator of axillary meristems1 causes elevated expression of ASCORBATE PEROXIDASE2 under non-photooxidative-stress conditions (Glazebrook and Ausubel, 1994; Cobbett et al., 1998; Ball et al., 2004).GSH2 null alleles (gsh2-1 and gsh2-2) are also lethal, although plants survive to the early seedling stage (Pasternak et al., 2008). Survival past the embryo stage was attributed to partial complementation of GSH activity by γ-EC, which accumulates to excessive levels in gsh2-1, and the mutant is partially rescued by GSH supplementation. Missense and nonsense GSH2 alleles of membrane trafficking mutants (gsh2-3–gsh2-5) disrupt endoplasmic reticulum (ER) organization and also arrest growth in early seedling development, while a weaker allele (gsh2-6) reached maturity but was smaller than the wild type (Au et al., 2012). A screen for reduced response to Cd also yielded a viable missense mutant of GSH2 (nonresponse or reduced response to Cd2) with approximately 75% of the wild-type GSH level (Jobe et al., 2012).Plant oxidative stress responses involve both redox signaling through GSH and jasmonate hormonal signaling, and gene expression studies have clearly linked these two signaling systems. GSH biosynthesis and metabolism genes are induced by jasmonate, while manipulating GSH level or redox status in various mutants alters expression of genes for jasmonate biosynthesis and signaling (Xiang and Oliver, 1998; Mhamdi et al., 2010; Han et al., 2013). GSH and jasmonate are also associated with protective glucosinolate production in response to insect feeding (Noctor et al., 2011). For example, pad2-1 is deficient in glucosinolates and more susceptible to insects, while several studies have shown jasmonate induces glucosinolates (Brader et al., 2001; Mikkelsen et al., 2003; Sasaki-Sekimoto et al., 2005; Schlaeppi et al., 2008). Liu et al. (2010) isolated jasmonic acid hypersensitive1 (jah1), an Arabidopsis mutant with greater inhibition of root growth than the wild type in the presence of jasmonic acid (JA). The affected gene encodes a cytochrome P450 (CYP82C3) involved in indole glucosinolate production, and this mutant was more susceptible to Botrytis cinerea.The basic mechanism of jasmonate signal transduction and some of the downstream responses emanating from it are now well understood (Browse, 2009; Wasternack and Hause, 2013). However, the mechanisms by which jasmonate and GSH coordinate their activities to mediate oxidative stress and other responses are not known. This study characterized, to our knowledge, a new jasmonate-hypersensitive mutant that accumulates excess γ-EC due to a defect in GSH2, but GSH is only modestly reduced. Results show that elevated γ-EC is deleterious to plant growth through a jasmonate-dependent mechanism.     

Traffic of Human α-Mannosidase in Plant Cells Suggests the Presence of a New Endoplasmic Reticulum-to-Vacuole Pathway without Involving the Golgi Complex

The transport of secretory proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum to the vacuole requires sorting signals as well as specific transport mechanisms. This work is focused on the transport in transgenic tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants of a human α-mannosidase, MAN2B1, which is a lysosomal enzyme involved in the turnover of N-linked glycoproteins and can be used in enzyme replacement therapy. Although ubiquitously expressed, α-mannosidases are targeted to lysosomes or vacuoles through different mechanisms according to the organisms in which these proteins are produced. In tobacco cells, MAN2B1 reaches the vacuole even in the absence of mannose-6-phosphate receptors, which are responsible for its transport in animal cells. We report that MAN2B1 is targeted to the vacuole without passing through the Golgi complex. In addition, a vacuolar targeting signal that is recognized in plant cells is located in the MAN2B1 amino-terminal region. Indeed, when this amino-terminal domain is removed, the protein is retained in the endoplasmic reticulum. Moreover, when this domain is added to a plant-secreted protein, the resulting fusion protein is partially redirected to the vacuole. These results strongly suggest the existence in plants of a new type of vacuolar traffic that can be used by leaf cells to transport vacuolar proteins.Acidic α-mannosidases (EC 3.2.1.24) are exoglycosidases responsible for the removal of α-linked Man residues in the catabolism of glycoproteins (Daniel et al., 1994). These enzymes are secretory proteins that perform their function within the lysosomes in mammalian cells and into the vacuoles of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and plant cells. Moreover, acidic α-mannosidases have also been described in microorganisms (Santacruz-Tinoco et al., 2010). The secretory proteins normally move from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the target compartment using either vesicles or direct connections between compartments (Vitale and Hinz, 2005). These types of proteins need an N-terminal signal peptide to be inserted into the ER, which is removed in the ER lumen by signal peptidases. Once in the ER, secretory proteins, in the absence of other types of sorting signals, are secreted out of the cell (Jurgens, 2004). With regard to acidic α-mannosidases, while the primary structure of these proteins is highly conserved among various kingdoms, the way in which they are targeted to their final compartment inside the cell differs in eukaryotic cells. In animal cells, these hydrolases are transported to lysosomes thanks to trans-Golgi mannose 6-phosphate receptors (MPRs) that recognize the phosphorylation of a specific residue of Man (Man-6-P) in the glucidic structure of the protein. Hence, the phosphorylated oligosaccharide side chains act as targeting signals for the lysosomal compartment (Thomas, 2001; Hansen et al., 2004). Two types of MPRs have been identified with molecular masses of 46 kD (cation-dependent MPR) and 300 kD (cation-independent MPR). MPRs are also present on the cell surface, and at least the cation-independent MPR is capable of endocytosing extracellular lysosomal hydrolases (Díaz and Pfeffer, 1998). In yeast, these enzymes reach the vacuolar localization by both cytoplasm-to-vacuole targeting and autophagy pathways (Hutchins and Klionsky, 2001). In plants, vacuolar α-mannosidase follows the classic secretory pathway involving the ER-Golgi system to reach their final destination (Faye et al., 1998).Recently, a functional human α-mannosidase (MAN2B1) has been expressed in stably transformed tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants to develop an enzyme-replacement therapy for α-mannosidosis, which is a rare lysosomal storage disease caused by mutations in the MAN2B1 gene (De Marchis et al., 2011). In the human cells, MAN2B1 is synthesized as a high-M_r precursor that is posttranslationally modified by N-glycosylation, disulfide bridge formation, proteolysis, zinc binding, and homodimer formation (Tollersrud et al., 1997). Similarly, in transgenic plants, recombinant MAN2B1, provided with a plant signal peptide, is synthesized as a 110-kD precursor that undergoes specific posttranslational modifications including N-glycosylation and proteolytic maturation in the vacuole, producing four processed forms with apparent molecular masses of 70, 40, 32, and 18 kD. Unexpectedly, recombinant MAN2B1 in tobacco, instead of being secreted due to the absence in plants of MPRs (Gaudreault and Beevers, 1984), is targeted to the vacuole (De Marchis et al., 2011). Conversely, another human lysosomal enzyme, glucocerebrosidase, when produced in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) seeds, is mainly secreted in the apoplast, and only a minor fraction of the protein is detected in protein storage vacuoles (PSVs; He et al., 2012). Indeed, to facilitate glucocerebrosidase targeting to the vacuoles of carrot (Daucus carota) cells, Shaaltiel and colleagues (2007) added a seven-amino acid vacuole-targeting signal to the C terminus of the protein. Therefore, in this study, we tried to understand which route is used by the soluble lysosomal MAN2B1 in tobacco to reach the vacuoles.Mammalian lysosomes are considered equivalent to plant lytic vacuoles (LVs), but plants also contain PSVs for reserve accumulation, even if the distinction between different vacuoles is debated (Frigerio et al., 2008). In plants, regardless of the type of vacuole (LV or PSV), soluble vacuolar proteins reach the vacuole through the Golgi apparatus (Hwang, 2008). The transport of most secretory proteins from the ER to the Golgi complex is coat protein II mediated before reaching their final destinations. From the Golgi apparatus, vacuolar proteins reach the vacuole either through electron-opaque vesicles or via clathrin-coated vesicles (Vitale and Hinz, 2005). Plant vacuolar sorting signals and vacuolar sorting receptors that enable this traffic have recently been described (Hwang, 2008; De Marcos Lousa et al., 2012). There are certainly exceptions to this main vacuolar sorting mechanism, characterized by proteins that travel directly from the ER to the vacuole, bypassing the Golgi system, but these polypeptides are either membrane proteins or proteins that form insoluble aggregates. For example, the vacuolar storage proteins of pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima) reach PSVs via precursor-accumulating vesicles, bypassing the Golgi complex (Hara-Nishimura et al., 1998). In addition, the route that bypasses the Golgi system seems to be linked to the specific transport of proteins that form large aggregates (Herman and Schmidt, 2004; Herman, 2008). Cereal prolamins, when aggregated in the ER in large polymers, can also be transported directly from the ER to PSVs, apparently by autophagy (Levanony et al., 1992; Reyes et al., 2011). Moreover, many vacuolar enzymes are stored in ER-derived vesicles, which, under certain circumstances such as programmed cell death or seed germination, are directly fused with the vacuolar compartment (Hayashi et al., 2001; Rojo et al., 2003).We show that MAN2B1, when expressed in tobacco, reaches the vacuole of leaf cells while bypassing the Golgi and that the N-terminal domain of MAN2B1 has a cryptic vacuolar targeting signal. Indeed, the removal of 200 amino acids from the N terminus prevents MAN2B1 vacuolar delivery, and, when fused with a secreted protein, this N-terminal domain is able to redirect this protein to the vacuole by a transport mechanism without involving the Golgi apparatus. Therefore, this study describes an alternative route followed by plant soluble vacuolar proteins to reach the vacuole directly from the ER, without passing through the Golgi complex.     

Reticulomics: Protein-Protein Interaction Studies with Two Plasmodesmata-Localized Reticulon Family Proteins Identify Binding Partners Enriched at Plasmodesmata,Endoplasmic Reticulum,and the Plasma Membrane

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a ubiquitous organelle that plays roles in secretory protein production, folding, quality control, and lipid biosynthesis. The cortical ER in plants is pleomorphic and structured as a tubular network capable of morphing into flat cisternae, mainly at three-way junctions, and back to tubules. Plant reticulon family proteins (RTNLB) tubulate the ER by dimerization and oligomerization, creating localized ER membrane tensions that result in membrane curvature. Some RTNLB ER-shaping proteins are present in the plasmodesmata (PD) proteome and may contribute to the formation of the desmotubule, the axial ER-derived structure that traverses primary PD. Here, we investigate the binding partners of two PD-resident reticulon proteins, RTNLB3 and RTNLB6, that are located in primary PD at cytokinesis in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Coimmunoprecipitation of green fluorescent protein-tagged RTNLB3 and RTNLB6 followed by mass spectrometry detected a high percentage of known PD-localized proteins as well as plasma membrane proteins with putative membrane-anchoring roles. Förster resonance energy transfer by fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy assays revealed a highly significant interaction of the detected PD proteins with the bait RTNLB proteins. Our data suggest that RTNLB proteins, in addition to a role in ER modeling, may play important roles in linking the cortical ER to the plasma membrane.The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a multifunctional organelle (Hawes et al., 2015) and is the site of secretory protein production, folding, and quality control (Brandizzi et al., 2003) and lipid biosynthesis (Wallis and Browse, 2010), but it is also involved in many other aspects of day-to-day plant life, including auxin regulation (Friml and Jones, 2010) and oil and protein body formation (Huang, 1996; Herman, 2008). The cortical ER network displays a remarkable polygonal arrangement of motile tubules that are capable of morphing into small cisternae, mainly at the three-way junctions of the ER network (Sparkes et al., 2009). The cortical ER network of plants has been shown to play multiple roles in protein trafficking (Palade, 1975; Vitale and Denecke, 1999) and pathogen responses (for review, see Pattison and Amtmann, 2009; Beck et al., 2012).In plants, the protein family of reticulons (RTNLBs) contributes significantly to tubulation of the ER (Tolley et al., 2008, 2010; Chen et al., 2012). RTNLBs are integral ER membrane proteins that feature a C-terminal reticulon homology domain (RHD) that contains two major hydrophobic regions. These regions form two V-shaped transmembrane wedges joined together via a cytosolic loop, with the C and N termini of the protein facing the cytosol. RTNLBs can dimerize or oligomerize, creating localized tensions in the ER membrane, inducing varying degrees of membrane curvature (Sparkes et al., 2010). Hence, RTNLBs are considered to be essential in maintaining the tubular ER network.The ability of RTNLBs to constrict membranes is of interest in the context of cell plate development and the formation of primary plasmodesmata (PD; Knox et al., 2015). PD formation involves extensive remodeling of the cortical ER into tightly furled tubules to form the desmotubules, axial structures that run through the PD pore (Overall and Blackman, 1996; Ehlers and Kollmann, 2001). At only 15 nm in diameter, the desmotubule is one of the most constricted membrane structures found in nature, with no animal counterparts (Tilsner et al., 2011). PD are membrane-rich structures characterized by a close association of the plasma membrane (PM) with the ER. The forces that model the ER into desmotubules, however, are poorly understood. RTNLBs are excellent candidates for this process and can constrict fluorescent protein-labeled ER membranes into extremely fine tubules (Sparkes et al., 2010). We showed recently that two of the RTNLBs present in the PD proteome, RTNLB3 and RTNLB6 (Fernandez-Calvino et al., 2011), are present in primary PD at cytokinesis (Knox et al., 2015). However, nothing is known of the proteins that interact with RTNLBs identified in the PD proteome or that may link RTNLBs to the PM. To date, the only protein shown to bind to plant RTNLBs is RHD3-LIKE2, the plant homolog of the ER tubule fusion protein ATLASTIN (Lee et al., 2013).Here, we used a dual approach to identify interacting partners of RTNLB3 and RTNLB6 (Fernandez-Calvino et al., 2011; Knox et al.., 2015). First, we used GFP immunoprecipitation assays coupled to mass spectrometry (MS) to identify proteins potentially binding to RTNLB3 and RTNLB6. Second, from the proteins we identified, we conducted a detailed Förster resonance energy transfer by fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FRET-FLIM) analysis to confirm prey-bait interactions in vivo.The application of time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy to imaging biological systems has allowed the design and implementation of fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM). The technique allows measuring and determining the space map of picosecond fluorescence decay at each pixel of the image through confocal single and multiphoton excitation. The general fluorescence or Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) to determine the colocalization of two color chromophores can now be improved to determine physical interactions using FRET-FLIM and protein pairs tagged with appropriate GFP fluorophores and monomeric red fluorescent protein (mRFP). FRET-FLIM measures the reduction in the excited-state lifetime of GFP (donor) fluorescence in the presence of an acceptor fluorophore (e.g. mRFP) that is independent of the problems associated with steady-state intensity measurements. The observation of such a reduction is an indication that the two proteins are within a distance of 1 to 10 nm, thus indicating a direct physical interaction between the two protein fusions (Osterrieder et al., 2009; Sparkes et al., 2010; Schoberer and Botchway, 2014). It was shown previously that a reduction of as little as approximately 200 ps in the excited-state lifetime of the GFP-labeled protein represents quenching through a protein-protein interaction (Stubbs et al., 2005).Our interaction data identified a large percentage (40%) of ER proteins, including other RTNLB family members. However, we also found a relatively large number (25%) of proteins present in the published PD proteome (Fernandez-Calvino et al., 2011) and a surprisingly high proportion (35%) of PM proteins. Of the PD-resident proteins we identified, a significant number were shown previously to be targets of viral movement proteins (MPs) or proteins present within lipid rafts, consistent with the view that PD are lipid-rich microdomains (Bayer et al., 2014). Additional proteins identified suggested roles for RTNLBs in transport and pathogen defense. We suggest that RTNLBs may play key roles in anchoring and/or signaling between the cortical ER and PM.     

Peroxisomal ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter COMATOSE and the Multifunctional Protein ABNORMAL INFLORESCENCE MERISTEM Are Required for the Production of Benzoylated Metabolites in Arabidopsis Seeds

Secondary metabolites derived from benzoic acid (BA) are of central importance in the interactions of plants with pests, pathogens, and symbionts and are potentially important in plant development. Peroxisomal β-oxidation has recently been shown to contribute to BA biosynthesis in plants, but not all of the enzymes involved have been defined. In this report, we demonstrate that the peroxisomal ATP-binding cassette transporter COMATOSE is required for the accumulation of benzoylated secondary metabolites in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) seeds, including benzoylated glucosinolates and substituted hydroxybenzoylcholines. The ABNORMAL INFLORESCENCE MERISTEM protein, one of two multifunctional proteins encoded by Arabidopsis, is essential for the accumulation of these compounds, and MULTIFUNCTIONAL PROTEIN2 contributes to the synthesis of substituted hydroxybenzoylcholines. Of the two major 3-ketoacyl coenzyme A thiolases, KAT2 plays the primary role in BA synthesis. Thus, BA biosynthesis in Arabidopsis employs the same core set of β-oxidation enzymes as in the synthesis of indole-3-acetic acid from indole-3-butyric acid.Many important secondary metabolites in plants are derived from, or incorporate, benzoic acid (BA). These include compounds found in root exudates, inflorescences, stems, and flower volatiles (D’Auria and Gershenzon, 2005). BA is also potentially a precursor for the plant hormone salicylic acid (SA; Wildermuth et al., 2001). In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), benzoylated glucosinolates (BGs) accumulate in seeds, presumably as a deterrent against animal feeding. Thus, BA metabolites are believed to play key roles in the interactions of plants with microbial and animal pests as well as in beneficial relationships such as pollination systems (Boatright et al., 2004). Understanding the pathways and control of BA synthesis in plants, therefore, is very important.Three different pathways for the synthesis of BA have been proposed for plants (Boatright et al., 2004; Wildermuth, 2006). These begin with the first committed step of the phenylpropanoid pathway, the deamination of Phe by Phe ammonia lyase to produce trans-cinnamic acid (CA). CA can then be oxidized by CoA-independent reactions in the cytosol, or it may be activated with CoA and proceed through one cycle of peroxisomal β-oxidation. Alternatively, BA synthesis may proceed via a third, CoA-dependent but β-oxidation-independent, pathway that combines elements of the first two pathways (Wildermuth, 2006). Recent studies in Petunia hybrida have highlighted the importance of the peroxisomal β-oxidation pathway in the production of BA for incorporation into floral volatile benzenoids. Enzymes identified in this pathway to date are a cinnamate:CoA ligase (PhCNL/PhAAE [for acyl-activating enzyme]) that activates CA (Colquhoun et al., 2012; Klempien et al., 2012), a multifunctional protein (PhMFP) that hydrates and oxidizes the trans-cinnamoyl-CoA (Qualley et al., 2012), and a 3-ketoacyl CoA thiolase (PhKAT1) that cleaves the resultant β-keto thioester (Van Moerkercke et al., 2009).Seeds of Arabidopsis accumulate appreciable amounts of BGs (Reichelt et al., 2002; Kliebenstein et al., 2007). Thus, while free BA is not detected in Arabidopsis seeds (Ibdah and Pichersky, 2009), the accumulation of BGs and other BA-containing secondary metabolites in Arabidopsis seeds provides a powerful experimental system with which to determine the pathway and potential control of BA synthesis in plants. For example, a peroxisomal acyl-CoA ligase (BZO1, for benzoyloxy glucosinolate) has been identified in Arabidopsis that is closely related to PhCNL1 and is required for BG production in seeds (Kliebenstein et al., 2007). BZO1 has recently been shown to be an AAE with cinnamate:CoA ligase activity (Lee et al., 2012).To further investigate the requirement for peroxisomal β-oxidation in BA synthesis, and to identify key enzymes involved in Arabidopsis, we analyzed BA-containing secondary metabolites (BGs and substituted hydroxybenzoylated choline esters) of seeds from a suite of β-oxidation mutants covering the key steps of β-oxidation, including substrate import, activation, oxidation, and thiolysis. This work identifies specific isozymes in Arabidopsis that mediate these steps, defines a new role for ABNORMAL INFLORESCENCE MERISTEM (AIM1), and determines a route for the entry of CA into peroxisomes.     

MAIGO5 Functions in Protein Export from Golgi-Associated Endoplasmic Reticulum Exit Sites in Arabidopsis

Plant cells face unique challenges to efficiently export cargo from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to mobile Golgi stacks. Coat protein complex II (COPII) components, which include two heterodimers of Secretory23/24 (Sec23/24) and Sec13/31, facilitate selective cargo export from the ER; however, little is known about the mechanisms that regulate their recruitment to the ER membrane, especially in plants. Here, we report a protein transport mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana, named maigo5 (mag5), which abnormally accumulates precursor forms of storage proteins in seeds. mag5-1 has a deletion in the putative ortholog of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Homo sapiens Sec16, which encodes a critical component of ER exit sites (ERESs). mag mutants developed abnormal structures (MAG bodies) within the ER and exhibited compromised ER export. A functional MAG5/SEC16A–green fluorescent protein fusion localized at Golgi-associated cup-shaped ERESs and cycled on and off these sites at a slower rate than the COPII coat. MAG5/SEC16A interacted with SEC13 and SEC31; however, in the absence of MAG5/SEC16A, recruitment of the COPII coat to ERESs was accelerated. Our results identify a key component of ER export in plants by demonstrating that MAG5/SEC16A is required for protein export at ERESs that are associated with mobile Golgi stacks, where it regulates COPII coat turnover.     

Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) Modification Serves as a Primary Plasmodesmal Sorting Signal

Plasmodesmata (Pd) are membranous channels that serve as a major conduit for cell-to-cell communication in plants. The Pd-associated β-1,3-glucanase (BG_pap) and CALLOSE BINDING PROTEIN1 (PDCB1) were identified as key regulators of Pd conductivity. Both are predicted glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins (GPI-APs) carrying a conserved GPI modification signal. However, the subcellular targeting mechanism of these proteins is unknown, particularly in the context of other GPI-APs not associated with Pd. Here, we conducted a comparative analysis of the subcellular targeting of the two Pd-resident and two unrelated non-Pd GPI-APs in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). We show that GPI modification is necessary and sufficient for delivering both BG_pap and PDCB1 to Pd. Moreover, the GPI modification signal from both Pd- and non-Pd GPI-APs is able to target a reporter protein to Pd, likely to plasma membrane microdomains enriched at Pd. As such, the GPI modification serves as a primary Pd sorting signal in plant cells. Interestingly, the ectodomain, a region that carries the functional domain in GPI-APs, in Pd-resident proteins further enhances Pd accumulation. However, in non-Pd GPI-APs, the ectodomain overrides the Pd targeting function of the GPI signal and determines a specific GPI-dependent non-Pd localization of these proteins at the plasma membrane and cell wall. Domain-swap analysis showed that the non-Pd localization is also dominant over the Pd-enhancing function mediated by a Pd ectodomain. In conclusion, our results indicate that segregation between Pd- and non-Pd GPI-APs occurs prior to Pd targeting, providing, to our knowledge, the first evidence of the mechanism of GPI-AP sorting in plants.Plant cells are interconnected with cross-wall membranous channels called plasmodesmata (Pd). Recent studies have shown that the region of the plasma membrane (PM) lining the Pd channel is a specialized membrane microdomain whose lipid and protein composition differs from the rest of the PM (Tilsner et al., 2011, 2016; Bayer et al., 2014; González-Solís et al., 2014; Grison et al., 2015). In a similar manner, the cell wall domain surrounding the Pd channel is specialized and, unlike the rest of the cell wall, is devoid of cellulose, rich in pectin, and contains callose (an insoluble β-1,3-glucan; Zavaliev et al., 2011; Knox and Benitez-Alfonso, 2014). In response to physiological signals, callose can be transiently deposited and degraded at Pd, which provides a mechanism for controlling the Pd aperture in diverse developmental and stress-related processes (Zavaliev et al., 2011). Control of Pd functioning is mediated by proteins that are specifically targeted to Pd. Plasmodesmal proteins localized to the PM domain of Pd can be integral transmembrane proteins, such as Pd-localized proteins (Thomas et al., 2008), the receptor kinase ARABIDOPSIS CRINKLY4 (Stahl et al., 2013), and callose synthases (Vatén et al., 2011). Alternatively, Pd proteins can associate with the membrane through a lipid modification like myristoylation (e.g. remorins; Raffaele et al., 2009) or be attached by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor (e.g. Pd-associated β-1,3-glucanases [BG_pap]; Levy et al., 2007; Rinne et al., 2011; Benitez-Alfonso et al., 2013), Pd-associated callose-binding proteins (PDCBs; Simpson et al., 2009), and LYSIN MOTIF DOMAIN-CONTAINING PROTEIN2 (LYM2; Faulkner et al., 2013).Among the known Pd proteins involved in Pd-specific callose degradation is BG_pap, a cell wall enzyme carrying a glycosyl hydrolase family 17 (GH17) module as its functional domain (Levy et al., 2007). Another group of proteins controlling callose dynamics at Pd are PDCBs that harbor a callose-binding domain termed carbohydrate-binding module 43 (CBM43), implicated in stabilizing callose at Pd (Simpson et al., 2009). Some β-1,3-glucanases may combine the two callose-modifying activities by harboring both GH17 and CBM43 functional domains, and several such proteins were shown to localize to Pd (Rinne et al., 2011; Benitez-Alfonso et al., 2013; Gaudioso-Pedraza and Benitez-Alfonso, 2014). A distinct feature of BG_pap and PDCBs is that both are predicted glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins (GPI-APs). The GPI anchor is a form of posttranslational modification common to many cell surface proteins in all eukaryotes. GPI-APs are covalently attached to the outer leaflet of the PM through the GPI anchor. The basic structure of the anchor consists of ethanolamine phosphate, followed by a glycan chain of three Man residues and glucosamine, followed by phosphatidylinositol lipid moiety (EtNP-6Manα1-2Manα1-6Manα1-4GlcNα1-6myoinositol-1-P-lipid; Ferguson et al., 2009). All predicted GPI-APs carry an N-terminal secretion signal peptide (SP) similar to other secreted proteins. Distinctly, GPI-APs also carry a structurally conserved 25- to 30-residue C-terminal GPI attachment signal, which typically begins with a small amino acid (e.g. Ala, Asn, Asp, Cys, Gly, or Ser) termed omega, followed by a spacer region of five to 10 polar residues, and ending with a transmembrane segment of 15 to 20 hydrophobic residues (Ferguson et al., 2009). The entire region between the N-terminal and the C-terminal signals of a GPI-AP is termed the ectodomain and carries the protein’s functional domain(s). The GPI modification process takes place in the lumenal face of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in a cotranslational manner. Upon translocation into the ER, a GPI-AP is stabilized in the ER membrane by its C-terminal signal, which is concurrently cleaved after the omega amino acid, and a preassembled GPI anchor is covalently attached to the C terminus of the omega amino acid. After attachment to a protein, the GPI anchor undergoes a series of modifications (remodeling), both at the glucan chain and at the lipid moiety. Such remodeling is crucial for the sorting of GPI-APs in the secretory pathway and the subsequent lateral heterogeneity at the PM (Kinoshita, 2015). In particular, the addition of saturated fatty acid chains to the lipid moiety of the anchor leads to the enriched accumulation of GPI-APs in the PM microdomains, also termed lipid rafts (Muñiz and Zurzolo, 2014). In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), GPI modification has been predicted for 210 proteins of diverse functions at the PM or the cell wall or both (Borner et al., 2002). Despite extensive research on the GPI modification pathway and the function of GPI-APs in mammalian and yeast cells, such knowledge in plant systems is scarce. In particular, despite an emerging role of GPI-APs in the regulation of the cell wall domain of Pd, their subcellular targeting and compartmentalization mechanism have not been studied. In addition, it is not known how the targeting mechanism of Pd-resident GPI-APs is different from that of other classes of GPI-APs, which are not localized to Pd.In this study, we investigated the subcellular targeting mechanism of Pd-associated callose-modifying GPI-APs, BG_pap and PDCB1, and compared it with that of two unrelated non-Pd GPI-APs, ARABINOGALACTAN PROTEIN4 (AGP4) and LIPID TRANSFER PROTEIN1 (LTPG1). Using sequential fluorescent labeling of protein domains, we found that the C-terminal GPI modification signal present in both Pd- and non-Pd GPI-APs can function as a primary signal in targeting proteins to the Pd-enriched PM domain. Moreover, we show that while the GPI signal is sufficient for Pd targeting, the ectodomains in BG_pap and PDCB1 further enhance their accumulation at Pd. In contrast, the ectodomains in non-Pd GPI-APs mediate exclusion of the proteins from the Pd-enriched targeting pathway. The Pd exclusion effect was found to be dominant over the Pd-targeting function of the GPI signal and the Pd-enhancing function of the Pd ectodomain, and it possibly occurs prior to PM localization. Our findings thus uncover a novel Pd-targeting signal and provide, to our knowledge, the first evidence of the cellular mechanism that regulates the sorting of GPI-APs in plants.     

The Cytosolic Nucleoprotein of the Plant-Infecting Bunyavirus Tomato Spotted Wilt Recruits Endoplasmic Reticulum–Resident Proteins to Endoplasmic Reticulum Export Sites

In contrast with animal-infecting viruses, few known plant viruses contain a lipid envelope, and the processes leading to their membrane envelopment remain largely unknown. Plant viruses with lipid envelopes include viruses of the Bunyaviridae, which obtain their envelope from the Golgi complex. The envelopment process is predominantly dictated by two viral glycoproteins (Gn and Gc) and the viral nucleoprotein (N). During maturation of the plant-infecting bunyavirus Tomato spotted wilt, Gc localizes at endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membranes and becomes ER export competent only upon coexpression with Gn. In the presence of cytosolic N, Gc remains arrested in the ER but changes its distribution from reticular into punctate spots. Here, we show that these areas correspond to ER export sites (ERESs), distinct ER domains where glycoprotein cargo concentrates prior to coat protein II vesicle–mediated transport to the Golgi. Gc concentration at ERES is mediated by an interaction between its cytoplasmic tail (CT) and N. Interestingly, an ER-resident calnexin provided with Gc-CT was similarly recruited to ERES when coexpressed with N. Furthermore, disruption of actin filaments caused the appearance of a larger amount of smaller ERES loaded with N-Gc complexes, suggesting that glycoprotein cargo concentration acts as a trigger for de novo synthesis of ERES.