Replication-Dependent Sister Chromatid Recombination in Rad1 Mutants of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Homolog recombination and unequal sister chromatid recombination were monitored in rad1-1/rad1-1 diploid yeast cells deficient for excision repair, and in control cells, RAD1/rad1-1, after exposure to UV irradiation. In a rad1-1/rad1-1 diploid, UV irradiation stimulated much more sister chromatid recombination relative to homolog recombination when cells were irradiated in the G(1) or the G(2) phases of the cell cycle than was observed in RAD1/rad1-1 cells. Since sister chromatids are not present during G(1), this result suggested that unexcised lesions can stimulate sister chromatid recombination events during or subsequent to DNA replication. The results of mating rescue experiments suggest that unexcised UV dimers do not stimulate sister chromatid recombination during the G(2) phase, but only when they are present during DNA replication. We propose that there are two types of sister chromatid recombination in yeast. In the first type, unexcised UV dimers and other bulky lesions induce sister chromatid recombination during DNA replication as a mechanism to bypass lesions obstructing the passage of DNA polymerase, and this type is analogous to the type of sister chromatid exchange commonly observed cytologically in mammalian cells. In the second type, strand scissions created by X-irradiation or the excision of damaged bases create recombinogenic sites that result in sister chromatid recombination directly in G(2). Further support for the existence of two types of sister chromatid recombination is the fact that events induced in rad1-1/rad1-1 were due almost entirely to gene conversion, whereas those in RAD1/rad1-1 cells were due to a mixture of gene conversion and reciprocal recombination.     

The spindle pole body assembly component mps3p/nep98p functions in sister chromatid cohesion

For successful chromosome segregation during mitosis, several processes must occur early in the cell cycle, including spindle pole duplication, DNA replication, and the establishment of cohesion between nascent sister chromatids. Spindle pole body duplication begins in G1 and continues during early S-phase as spindle pole bodies mature and start to separate. Key steps in spindle pole body duplication are the sequential recruitment of Cdc31p and Spc42p by the nuclear envelope transmembrane protein Msp3p/Nep98p (herein termed Mps3p). Concurrent with DNA replication, Ctf7p/Eco1p (herein termed Ctf7p) ensures that nascent sister chromatids are paired together, identifying the products of replication as sister chromatids. Here, we provide the first evidence that the nuclear envelope spindle pole body assembly component Mps3p performs a function critical to sister chromatid cohesion. Mps3p was identified as interacting with Ctf7p from a genome-wide two-hybrid screen, and the physical interaction was confirmed by both in vivo (co-immunoprecipitation) and in vitro (GST pull-down) assays. An in vivo cohesion assay on new mps3/nep98 alleles revealed that loss of Mps3p results in precocious sister chromatid separation and that Mps3p functions after G1, coincident with Ctf7p. Mps3p is not required for cohesion during mitosis, revealing that Mps3p functions in cohesion establishment and not maintenance. Mutated Mps3p that results in cohesion defects no longer binds to Ctf7p in vitro, demonstrating that the interaction between Mps3p and Ctf7p is physiologically relevant. In support of this model, mps3 ctf7 double mutant cells exhibit conditional synthetic lethality. These findings document a new role for Mps3p in sister chromatid cohesion and provide novel insights into the mechanism by which a spindle pole body component, when mutated, contributes to aneuploidy.     

Epigenetic differences between sister chromatids?

Semi-conservative replication ensures that the DNA sequence of sister chromatids is identical except for replication errors and variation in the length of telomere repeats resulting from replicative losses and variable end processing. What happens with the various epigenetic marks during DNA replication is less clear. Many chromatin marks are likely to be copied onto both sister chromatids in conjunction with DNA replication, whereas others could be distributed randomly between sister chromatids. Epigenetic differences between sister chromatids could also emerge in a more predictable manner, for example, following processes that are associated with lagging strand DNA replication. The resulting epigenetic differences between sister chromatids could result in different gene expression patterns in daughter cells. This possibility has been difficult to test because techniques to distinguish between parental sister chromatids require analysis of single cells and are not obvious. Here, we briefly review the topic of sister chromatid epigenetics and discuss how the identification of sister chromatids in cells could change the way we think about asymmetric cell divisions and stochastic variation in gene expression between cells in general and paired daughter cells in particular.     

C-terminus of Sororin interacts with SA2 and regulates sister chromatid cohesion

Sororin is a conserved protein required for accurate separation of sister chromatids in each cell cycle. Sororin is recruited to chromatin during DNA replication, protects sister chromatid cohesion in S and G2 phase, and regulates the resolution of sister chromatid cohesion in mitosis. Sororin binds to cohesin complex, but how Sororin and cohesin subunits interact remains unclear. Here we report that the C-terminus of Sororin, especially the last 12 amino acid (aa) residues, is important for Sororin to bind cohesin core subunit SA2. Deletion of the last 12aa residues not only inhibits the interactions between Sororin and SA2 but also causes precocious chromosome separation. Our data suggest that the C-terminus of Sororin functions as an anchor binding to SA2, which facilitates other conserved motifs on Sororin to interact with other proteins to regulate sister chromatid cohesion and separation.     

Immunocytology of chiasmata and chromosomal disjunction at mouse meiosis

Immunocytological and in situ hybridization evidence supports the hypothesis that at meiosis of chiasmate organisms, chromosomal disjunction and reductional segregation of sister centromeres are integrated with synaptonemal complex functions. The Mr 125,000 synaptic protein, Syn1, present between cores of paired homologous chromosomes during pachytene of meiotic prophase, is lost from synaptonemal complexes coordinately with homolog separation at diplotene. Separation is constrained by exchanges between non-sister chromatids, the chiasmata. We show that the Mr 30,000 chromosomal core protein, Cor1, associated with sister chromatid pairs, remains an axial component of post-pachytene chromosomes until metaphase I. We demonstrate that at this time the chromatin loops are still attached to their cores. A reciprocal exchange event between two homologous non-sister chromatids is therefore immobilized by anchorage of sister chromatids to their respective cores. Cores thus contribute to the sister chromatid cohesiveness required for maintenance of chiasmata and proper chromosomal disjunction. Cor1 protein accumulates in juxtaposition to pairs of sister centromeres during metaphase I. Presumably, independent movement of sister centromeres at anaphase I is restricted by Cor1 anchorage. That reductional separation of sister centromeres is mediated by Cor1, is supported by the dissociation of Cor1 from separating sister centromeres at anaphase II and by its absence from mitotic anaphases.     

Unzipped and loaded: the role of DNA helicases and RFC clamp-loading complexes in sister chromatid cohesion

It is well known that the products of chromosome replication are paired to ensure that the sisters segregate away from each other during mitosis. A key issue is how cells pair sister chromatids but preclude the catastrophic pairing of nonsister chromatids. The identification of both replication factor C and DNA helicases as critical for sister chromatid pairing has brought new insights into this fundamental process.     

Sister chromatid cohesion is required for postreplicative double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The repair of DNA double-strand breaks by recombination requires the presence of an undamaged copy that is used as a template during the repair process. Because cells acquire resistance to gamma irradiation during DNA replication and because sister chromatids are the preferred partner for double-strand break repair in mitotic diploid yeast cells, it has long been suspected that cohesion between sister chromatids might be crucial for efficient repair. This hypothesis is consistent with the sensitivity to gamma irradiation of mutants defective in the cohesin complex that holds sister chromatids together from DNA replication until the onset of anaphase (reviewed in) . It is also in accordance with the finding that surveillance mechanisms (checkpoints) that sense DNA damage arrest cell cycle progression in yeast by causing stabilization of the securin Pds1, thereby blocking sister chromatid separation. The hypersensitivity to irradiation of cohesin mutants could, however, be due to a more direct involvement of the cohesin complex in the process of DNA repair. We show here that passage through S phase in the presence of cohesin, and not cohesin per se, is essential for efficient double-strand break repair during G2 in yeast. Proteins needed to load cohesin onto chromosomes (Scc2) and to generate cohesion during S phase (Eco1) are also shown to be required for repair. Our results confirm what has long been suspected but never proven, that cohesion between sister chromatids is essential for efficient double-strand break repair in mitotic cells.     

An Eco1-independent sister chromatid cohesion establishment pathway in S. cerevisiae

Cohesion between sister chromatids, mediated by the chromosomal cohesin complex, is a prerequisite for their alignment on the spindle apparatus and segregation in mitosis. Budding yeast cohesin first associates with chromosomes in G1. Then, during DNA replication in S-phase, the replication fork-associated acetyltransferase Eco1 acetylates the cohesin subunit Smc3 to make cohesin’s DNA binding resistant to destabilization by the Wapl protein. Whether stabilization of cohesin molecules that happen to link sister chromatids is sufficient to build sister chromatid cohesion, or whether additional reactions are required to establish these links, is not known. In addition to Eco1, several other factors contribute to cohesion establishment, including Ctf4, Ctf18, Tof1, Csm3, Chl1 and Mrc1, but little is known about their roles. Here, we show that each of these factors facilitates cohesin acetylation. Moreover, the absence of Ctf4 and Chl1, but not of the other factors, causes a synthetic growth defect in cells lacking Eco1. Distinct from acetylation defects, sister chromatid cohesion in ctf4Δ and chl1Δ cells is not improved by removing Wapl. Unlike previously thought, we do not find evidence for a role of Ctf4 and Chl1 in Okazaki fragment processing, or of Okazaki fragment processing in sister chromatid cohesion. Thus, Ctf4 and Chl1 delineate an additional acetylation-independent pathway that might hold important clues as to the mechanism of sister chromatid cohesion establishment.     

Selective differential staining of sister chromatids of the facultative heterochromatic X chromosome in the female mouse

Selective differential staining of sister chromatids for the facultative heterochromatic X chromosome in the female mouse has been achieved by the combination of two differential staining techniques; one for the heterochromatic X chromosome and the other for sister chromatids. Thermal hypotonic treatment moderately destroyed the chromosome structure except for the heterochromatic X in BrdU labelled metaphase cells, resulting in the selective sister chromatid differentiation of this X with Giemsa stain. This technique enables us to know the exact frequency of the spontaneous sister chromatid exchanges in the heterochromatic X without using ³H-TdR labelling for detecting the late DNA replication. The results indicate that the sister chromatid exchange frequency of the heterochromatic X chromosome is not affected by its late DNA replication during S phase, or by the genetic inactivation and the resulting heterochromatinization.     

A matter of choice: the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion

Sister chromatid cohesion is the basis for the recognition of chromosomal DNA replication products for their bipolar segregation in mitosis. Fundamental to sister chromatid cohesion is the ring‐shaped cohesin complex, which is loaded onto chromosomes long before the initiation of DNA replication and is thought to hold replicated sister chromatids together by topological embrace. What happens to cohesin when the replication fork approaches, and how cohesin recognizes newly synthesized sister chromatids, is poorly understood. The characterization of a number of cohesion establishment factors has begun to provide hints as to the reactions involved. Cohesin is a member of the evolutionarily conserved family of Smc subunit‐based protein complexes that contribute to many aspects of chromosome biology by mediating long‐range DNA interactions. I propose that the establishment of cohesion equates to the selective stabilization of those cohesin‐mediated DNA interactions that link sister chromatids in the wake of replication forks.     

Condensin aids sister chromatid decatenation by topoisomerase II

The condensin complex is a key determinant of mitotic chromosome architecture. In addition, condensin promotes resolution of sister chromatids during anaphase, a function that is conserved from prokaryotes to human. Anaphase bridges observed in cells lacking condensin are reminiscent of chromosome segregation failure after inactivation of topoisomerase II (topo II), the enzyme that removes catenanes persisting between sister chromatids following DNA replication. Circumstantial evidence has linked condensin to sister chromatid decatenation but, because of the difficulty of observing chromosome catenation, this link has remained indirect. Alternative models for how condensin facilitates chromosome resolution have been put forward. Here, we follow the catenation status of circular minichromosomes of three sizes during the Saccharomyeces cerevisiae cell cycle. Catenanes are produced during DNA replication and are for the most part swiftly resolved during and following S-phase, aided by sister chromatid separation. Complete resolution, however, requires the condensin complex, a dependency that becomes more pronounced with increasing chromosome size. Our results provide evidence that condensin prevents deleterious anaphase bridges during chromosome segregation by promoting sister chromatid decatenation.     

Mitotic inter-homologue junctions accumulate at damaged DNA replication forks in recQ mutants

Mitotic homologous recombination is utilised to repair DNA breaks using either sister chromatids or homologous chromosomes as templates. Because sister chromatids are identical, exchanges between sister chromatids have no consequences for the maintenance of genomic integrity unless they involve repetitive DNA sequences. Conversely, homologous chromosomes might differ in genetic content, and exchanges between homologues might lead to loss of heterozygosity and subsequent inactivation of functional genes. Genomic instability, caused by unscheduled recombination events between homologous chromosomes, is enhanced in the absence of RecQ DNA helicases, as observed in Bloom's cancer-prone syndrome. Here, we used two-dimensional gel electrophoresis to analyse budding yeast diploid cells that were modified to distinguish replication intermediates originating from each homologous chromosome. Therefore, these cells were suitable for analysing the formation of inter-homologue junctions. We found that Rad51-dependent DNA structures resembling inter-homologue junctions accumulate together with sister chromatid junctions at damaged DNA replication forks in recQ mutants, but not in the absence of Srs2 or Mph1 DNA recombination helicases. Inter-homologue joint molecules in recQ mutants are less abundant than sister chromatid junctions, but they accumulate with similar kinetics after origin firing under conditions of DNA damage. We propose that unscheduled accumulation of inter-homologue junctions during DNA replication might account for allelic recombination defects in recQ mutants.     

Postreplicative recruitment of cohesin to double-strand breaks is required for DNA repair

Chromosome stability depends on accurate chromosome segregation and efficient DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. Sister chromatid cohesion, established during S phase by the protein complex cohesin, is central to both processes. In the absence of cohesion, chromosomes missegregate and G2-phase DSB repair fails. Here, we demonstrate that G2-phase repair also requires the presence of cohesin at the damage site. Cohesin components are shown to be recruited to extended chromosome regions surrounding DNA breaks induced during G2. We find that in the absence of functional cohesin-loading proteins (Scc2/Scc4), the accumulation of cohesin at DSBs is abolished and repair is defective, even though sister chromatids are connected by S phase generated cohesion. Evidence is also provided that DSB induction elicits establishment of sister chromatid cohesion in G2, implicating that damage-recruited cohesin facilitates DNA repair by tethering chromatids.     

The mechanism of sister chromatid cohesion

Each of our cells inherit their genetic information in the form of chromosomes from a mother cell. In order that we obtain the full genetic complement, cells need to ensure that replicated chromosomes are accurately split and distributed during cell division. Mistakes in this process lead to aneuploidies, cells with supernumerous or missing chromosomes. Most aneuploid human embryos are not viable, and if they are, they develop severe birth defects. Aneuploidies later in human life are frequently found associated with the development of malignant cancer. DNA replication during S-phase is linked to segregation of the sister copies in mitosis by sister chromatid cohesion. A chromosomal protein complex, cohesin, holds replicated sister DNA strands together after their synthesis. This allows pairs of replication products to be recognised by the spindle apparatus in mitosis for segregation into opposite direction. At anaphase onset, cohesin is destroyed by a site-specific protease, separase. Here I review what we have learned about the molecular mechanism of sister chromatid cohesion. Cohesin forms a large proteinaceous ring that may hold sister chromatids by encircling and topological trapping. To understand how cohesin links newly synthesised replication products, biochemical assays to study the enzymology of cohesin will be required.     

PCNA controls establishment of sister chromatid cohesion during S phase

Accurate segregation of the genetic material during cell division requires that sister chromatids are kept together by cohesion proteins until anaphase, when the chromatids become separated and distributed to the two daughter cells. Studies in yeast revealed that chromatid cohesion is essential for viability and is triggered by the conserved protein Eco1 (Ctf7). Cohesion must be established already in S phase in order to tie up sister chromatids instantly after replication, but how this crucial timing is achieved remains enigmatic. Here, we report that in yeast and humans Eco1 is directly physically coupled to the replication protein PCNA, a ring-shaped cofactor of DNA polymerases. Binding to PCNA is crucial, as yeast Eco1 mutants deficient in Eco1-PCNA interaction are defective in cohesion and inviable. Our study thus indicates that PCNA, a central matchmaker for replication-linked functions, is also crucially involved in the establishment of cohesion in S phase.     

GFP tagging of budding yeast chromosomes reveals that protein–protein interactions can mediate sister chromatid cohesion

Background Precise control of sister chromatid separation is essential for the accurate transmission of genetic information. Sister chromatids must remain linked to each other from the time of DNA replication until the onset of chromosome segregation, when the linkage must be promptly dissolved. Recent studies suggest that the machinery that is responsible for the destruction of mitotic cyclins also degrades proteins that play a role in maintaining sister chromatid linkage, and that this machinery is regulated by the spindle-assembly checkpoint. Studies on these problems in budding yeast are hampered by the inability to resolve its chromosomes by light or electron microscopy.Results We have developed a novel method for visualizing specific DNA sequences in fixed and living budding yeast cells. A tandem array of 256 copies of the Lac operator is integrated at the desired site in the genome and detected by the binding of a green fluorescent protein (GFP)–Lac repressor fusion expressed from the HIS3 promoter. Using this method, we show that sister chromatid segregation precedes the destruction of cyclin B. In mad or bub cells, which lack the spindle-assembly checkpoint, sister chromatid separation can occur in the absence of microtubules. The expression of a tetramerizing form of the GFP–Lac repressor, which can bind Lac operators on two different DNA molecules, can hold sister chromatids together under conditions in which they would normally separate.Conclusions We conclude that sister chromatid separation in budding yeast can occur in the absence of microtubule-dependent forces, and that protein complexes that can bind two different DNA molecules are capable of holding sister chromatids together.     

The Cohesion Protein SOLO Associates with SMC1 and Is Required for Synapsis,Recombination, Homolog Bias and Cohesion and Pairing of Centromeres in Drosophila Meiosis

Cohesion between sister chromatids is mediated by cohesin and is essential for proper meiotic segregation of both sister chromatids and homologs. solo encodes a Drosophila meiosis-specific cohesion protein with no apparent sequence homology to cohesins that is required in male meiosis for centromere cohesion, proper orientation of sister centromeres and centromere enrichment of the cohesin subunit SMC1. In this study, we show that solo is involved in multiple aspects of meiosis in female Drosophila. Null mutations in solo caused the following phenotypes: 1) high frequencies of homolog and sister chromatid nondisjunction (NDJ) and sharply reduced frequencies of homolog exchange; 2) reduced transmission of a ring-X chromosome, an indicator of elevated frequencies of sister chromatid exchange (SCE); 3) premature loss of centromere pairing and cohesion during prophase I, as indicated by elevated foci counts of the centromere protein CID; 4) instability of the lateral elements (LE)s and central regions of synaptonemal complexes (SCs), as indicated by fragmented and spotty staining of the chromosome core/LE component SMC1 and the transverse filament protein C(3)G, respectively, at all stages of pachytene. SOLO and SMC1 are both enriched on centromeres throughout prophase I, co-align along the lateral elements of SCs and reciprocally co-immunoprecipitate from ovarian protein extracts. Our studies demonstrate that SOLO is closely associated with meiotic cohesin and required both for enrichment of cohesin on centromeres and stable assembly of cohesin into chromosome cores. These events underlie and are required for stable cohesion of centromeres, synapsis of homologous chromosomes, and a recombination mechanism that suppresses SCE to preferentially generate homolog crossovers (homolog bias). We propose that SOLO is a subunit of a specialized meiotic cohesin complex that mediates both centromeric and axial arm cohesion and promotes homolog bias as a component of chromosome cores.     

Sister chromatid cohesion role for CDC28-CDK in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

High-fidelity chromosome segregation requires that the sister chromatids produced during S phase also become paired during S phase. Ctf7p (Eco1p) is required to establish sister chromatid pairing specifically during DNA replication. However, Ctf7p also becomes active during G(2)/M in response to DNA damage. Ctf7p is a phosphoprotein and an in vitro target of Cdc28p cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK), suggesting one possible mechanism for regulating the essential function of Ctf7p. Here, we report a novel synthetic lethal interaction between ctf7 and cdc28. However, neither elevated CDC28 levels nor CDC28 Cak1p-bypass alleles rescue ctf7 cell phenotypes. Moreover, cells expressing Ctf7p mutated at all full- and partial-consensus CDK-phosphorylation sites exhibit robust cell growth. These and other results reveal that Ctf7p regulation is more complicated than previously envisioned and suggest that CDK acts in sister chromatid cohesion parallel to Ctf7p reactions.     

Sister Chromatids Are Preferred over Homologs as Substrates for Recombinational Repair in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

A diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain was constructed in which the products of both homolog recombination and unequal sister chromatid recombination events could be selected. This strain was synchronized in G1 or in G2, irradiated with X-rays to induce DNA damage, and monitored for levels of recombination. Cells irradiated in G1 were found to repair recombinogenic damage primarily by homolog recombination, whereas those irradiated in G2 repaired such damage preferentially by sister chromatid recombination. We found, as have others, that G1 diploids were much more sensitive to the lethal effects of X-ray damage than were G2 diploids, especially at higher doses of irradiation. The following possible explanations for this observation were tested: G2 cells have more potential templates for repair than G1 cells; G2 cells are protected by the RAD9-mediated delay in G2 following DNA damage; sister chromatids may share more homology than homologous chromosomes. All these possibilities were ruled out by appropriate tests. We propose that, due to a special relationship they share, sister chromatids are not only preferred over homologous chromatids as substrates for recombinational repair, but have the capacity to repair more DNA damage than do homologs.     

From a single double helix to paired double helices and back

The propagation of our genomes during cell proliferation depends on the movement of sister DNA molecules produced by DNA replication to opposite sides of the cell before it divides. This feat is achieved by microtubules in eukaryotic cells but it has long remained a mystery how cells ensure that sister DNAs attach to microtubules with opposite orientations, known as amphitelic attachment. It is currently thought that sister chromatid cohesion has a crucial role. By resisting the forces exerted by microtubules, sister chromatid cohesion gives rise to tension that is thought essential for stabilizing kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Efficient amphitelic attachment is therefore achieved by an error correction mechanism that selectively eliminates connections that do not give rise to tension. Cohesion between sister chromatids is mediated by a multisubunit complex called cohesin which forms a gigantic ring structure. It has been proposed that sister DNAs are held together owing to their becoming entrapped within a single cohesin ring. Cohesion between sister chromatids is destroyed at the metaphase to anaphase transition by proteolytic cleavage of cohesin's Scc1 subunit by a thiol protease called separase, which severs the ring and thereby releases sister DNAs.