护理干预对母婴分离产妇的影响及应用效果

目的探讨护理干预对母婴分离产妇分娩后的影响及应用价值。方法对2014年3月至2015年8月本科室收治的110例由于早产、窒息等等因素导致分娩后母婴分离的产妇,随机分为干预组(55例)和对照组(55例),分娩后对照组实施常规护理,干预组产妇分娩后对其实施相应护理干预,对其焦虑自评量表SAS得分、抑郁自评量表SDS得分,评价其产后的焦虑、抑郁情况。结果经护理干预后干预组产妇的SAS得分(28.62±2.17),SDS得分(32.18±1.87)均明显低于对照组,差距有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论对由于疾病因素母婴分离的产妇实施护理干预能有效的缓解其焦虑、抑郁情绪,具有一定的推广意义。     

《灵长类动物与人类疾病模型》专刊导读

目前,生物医学研究中所使用的实验动物主要以啮齿类动物(小鼠、大鼠)为主,许多人类疾病模型也是以这些啮齿类为主而建立的。但由于啮齿类在进化地位、生理病理机制方面与人类有巨大差异,在这些啮齿类上所积累的知识和取得的研究成果,与人类疾病的实际     

大兴安岭森林采伐地区人房内鼠类区系的演替现象

在人类活动影响下,动物区系常有阴显的演替现象。作者在内蒙古大兴安岭牙林铁路沿线工作期间,曾进行了人房内小形啮齿类区系演替现象的观察。分别选择了新开发的、采伐后1—5年和15—30年的林区,对人房内小形啮齿类的组成及     

分离自母婴肠道的假小链双歧杆菌的耐药性分析

【背景】由于滥用抗生素导致细菌耐药性日益严重。对于双歧杆菌,人们往往注重其益生功能的挖掘而忽视了对其耐药性的研究,存在一定的安全隐患。【目的】检测母婴肠道中假小链双歧杆菌的耐药性,探究婴儿肠道中假小链双歧杆菌耐药性的来源。【方法】利用微量肉汤稀释法测定48株分离自母婴肠道的假小链双歧杆菌对14种抗生素的耐药性,比较分离自不同家庭母婴肠道中假小链双歧杆菌的耐药性。【结果】48株母婴肠道分离株对四环素、氯霉素、新霉素、环丙沙星100%耐药,对其余10种抗生素耐药率依次为：卡那霉素98%、利福平80%、克林霉素78%、甲氧苄啶63%、红霉素59%、庆大霉素43%、链霉素16%、万古霉素14%、氨苄西林6%、利奈唑胺2%。母婴肠道分离株的耐药性无显著差异,分离自同一家庭母婴肠道的菌株具有相似的耐药表型。【结论】分离自母婴肠道的假小链双歧杆菌对多种抗生素具有耐药性,婴儿肠道中假小链双歧杆菌的耐药性可能是由母亲肠道垂直传递而来。     

兰州地区实验动物肺支原体感染调查和分离鉴定

目的了解兰州地区啮齿类实验动物的肺支原体感染情况和感染菌株.方法用分离培养法对兰州地区640只啮齿类实验动物肺支原体的感染情况分春夏秋冬进行调查,并对分离株进行克隆纯化,从形态学,生化特性和血清学方面进行鉴定.结果肺支原体在普通级小鼠中的感染率为23%,普通级豚鼠、地鼠、大鼠和清洁级小鼠未发现有感染,且感染率与季节无明显相关性.分离株经鉴定均为支原体科支原体属肺支原体.     

首次从啮齿类和食虫类动物中分离到森林脑炎病毒

1988年,我们从采自云南高黎贡山的卵形硬蜱及患者血液中分离到森林脑炎病毒。1990年,又从该地区10种95只啮齿类中查到森林脑炎病毒抗体;并从社鼠(R.confucianus)、小林姬鼠(A.sylvaticus)和灰腹鼠(R.eha ninus)等8种啮齿类及食虫类中分离到15株病毒,选三株用单克隆抗体进行免疫荧光试验、理化特性、生物学特性及中和试验研究。结果表明,其病毒的抗原性、生物学特性及理化特性与东北株及从卵形硬蜱、患者分离的森林脑炎病毒一致。从啮齿类及食虫类分离到森林脑炎病毒在国内属首次报道。这项研究结果进一步证明,啮食类和食虫类在森林脑炎自然疫源地的保存方面起重要作用。     

帕金森病伴抑郁患者DBS术后帕罗西汀治疗疗效观察

目的：研究丘脑底核（STN）脑深部电刺激（DBS）治疗帕金森病（PD）合并抑郁障碍术后服用帕罗西汀治疗的疗效。方法：将38例合并抑郁障碍的PD患者随机分为三组,行丘脑底核脑深部电极植入术,术后空白对照组不服用任何抗抑郁药物,药物治疗组服用帕罗西汀每日一次,每次20mg,安慰剂组服用安慰剂。术前一周,术后1个月、2个月和3个月进行随访和临床评价。结果：抑郁患者术后抑郁障碍症状如焦虑、绝望和激越症状也有不同程度好转,应用安慰剂后,患者术后抑郁障碍程度好转程度大于空白对照组（P〈0.05）,而应用帕罗西汀后术后3个月汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分（HAMD）下降程度显著低于空白对照组及安慰剂组（P〈0.05）。结论：表明STN-DBS术后PD患者的抑郁症状有所改善,辅助抗抑郁药物治疗效果更佳。     

帕金森病伴抑郁患者DBS 术后帕罗西汀治疗疗效观察

目的:研究丘脑底核(STN)脑深部电刺激(DBS)治疗帕金森病(PD)合并抑郁障碍术后服用帕罗西汀治疗的疗效。方法:将38例合并抑郁障碍的PD患者随机分为三组,行丘脑底核脑深部电极植入术,术后空白对照组不服用任何抗抑郁药物,药物治疗组服用帕罗西汀每日一次,每次20mg,安慰剂组服用安慰剂。术前一周,术后1个月、2个月和3个月进行随访和临床评价。结果:抑郁患者术后抑郁障碍症状如焦虑、绝望和激越症状也有不同程度好转,应用安慰剂后,患者术后抑郁障碍程度好转程度大于空白对照组(P<0.05),而应用帕罗西汀后术后3个月汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分(HAMD)下降程度显著低于空白对照组及安慰剂组(P<0.05)。结论:表明STN-DBS术后PD患者的抑郁症状有所改善,辅助抗抑郁药物治疗效果更佳。     

出生早期母婴分离对新生小鼠神经元细胞凋亡的影响

目的:探讨出生早期母婴分离对新生儿神经系统的影响及其相关机制。方法:随机选择2015年1月~2015年9月出生的新生小鼠120例作为本次研究的对象,其中新生小鼠出生后实施母婴分离的作为观察组(60只),出生后不实施母婴分离的作为对照组(60只)。比较两组新生小鼠的神经系统、神经细胞的变化。结果:观察组新生小鼠在母婴分离第7天、14天、21天的神经元细胞的凋亡率显著高于对照组新生(P值均0.05),神经元胱天蛋白酶-3(Caspase-3)蛋白表达均明显高于对照组(P值均0.05)。观察组新生小鼠的母婴分离14天、21天的神经胶质细胞小窝蛋白-1(Caveo-1)蛋白的表达,与对照组新生小鼠的神经胶质细胞Caveo-1蛋白的表达进行比较,(P值均0.05),具有统计学意义。结论:出生早期实施母婴分离,对新生儿的神经系统会产生较大的影响,影响新生儿发育中神经系统的表达,进而会影响新生儿成年后的行为发育异常。     

双相障碍抑郁发作及单相抑郁症患者血清T3、T4、TSH和BDNF水平的相关性分析

目的:分析双相障碍抑郁发作及单相抑郁症患者与血清三碘甲状腺原氨酸(T3)、甲状腺素(T4)、甲状腺激素(TSH)和脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)水平的相关性。方法:选取2017年12月～2019年12月我院收治的120例抑郁症患者为研究对象,按照病情不同分为双相障碍抑郁发作组(n=50)、单相抑郁症组(n=70),同时选取同期于本院进行体检的30例健康者作为对照组,检测血清T3、T4、TSH和BDNF水平,并进行汉密尔顿抑郁(HAMD)量表评分,分析血清T3、T4、TSH和BDNF水平的相关性。结果:双相障碍抑郁发作组起病年龄低于单相抑郁症组(P0.05);治疗前双相障碍抑郁发作组和单相抑郁症组血清T3水平高于对照组,TSH、BDNF水平低于对照组(P0.05),双相障碍抑郁发作组血清T4水平高于对照组,单相抑郁症组和对照组血清T4水平比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05),双相障碍抑郁发作组血清T4水平高于单相抑郁症组,TSH、BDNF水平低于单相抑郁症组(P0.05);治疗后双相障碍抑郁发作组和单相抑郁症组血清T4水平低于对照组,双相障碍抑郁发作组血清T4水平低于单相抑郁症组(P0.05),且三组血清T3、TSH、BDNF水平比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05);治疗后双相障碍抑郁发作组认知障碍因子评分低于单相抑郁症组(P0.05);Spearman相关分析显示,血清T3、T4、TSH水平和HAMD评分与BDNF呈负相关,TSH水平与BDNF呈正相关(P0.05)。结论:抑郁症患者血清T3、T4、TSH和BDNF水平存在异常,可作为判断双相障碍抑郁发作及单相抑郁症的指标。     

On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta

The phylogenetic relationships of the Clitellata were investigated with a data set of published and new complete 18S rRNA gene sequences of 51 species representing 41 families. Sequences were aligned on the basis of a secondary structure model and analysed with maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. In contrast to the latter method, parsimony did not recover the monophyly of Clitellata. However, a close scrutiny of the data suggested a spurious attraction between some polychaetes and clitellates. As a rule, molecular trees are closely aligned with morphology-based phylogenies. Acanthobdellida and Euhirudinea were reconciled in their traditional Hirudinea clade and were included in the Oligochaeta with the Branchiobdellida via the Lumbriculidae as a possible link between the two assemblages. While the 18S gene yielded a meaningful historical signal for determining relationships within clitellates, the exact position of Hirudinea and Branchiobdellida within oligochaetes remained unresolved. The lack of phylogenetic signal is interpreted as evidence for a rapid radiation of these taxa. The placement of Clitellata within the Polychaeta remained unresolved. The biological reality of polytomies within annelids is suggested and supports the hypothesis of an extremely ancient radiation of polychaetes and emergence of clitellates.     

On the ontogeny of the haptor and the evolution of the Monogenea

Data on the ontogeny of the posterior haptor of monogeneans were obtained from more than 150 publications and summarised. These data were plotted into diagrams showing evolutionary capacity levels based on the theory of a progressive evolution of marginal hooks, anchors and other attachment components of the posterior haptor in the Monogenea (Malmberg, 1986). 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks are assumed to be the most primitive monogenean haptoral condition. Thus the diagrams were founded on a 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hook evolutionary capacity level, and the evolutionary capacity levels of anchors and other haptoral attachement components were arranged according to haptoral ontogenetical sequences. In the final plotting diagram data on hosts, type of spermatozoa, oncomiracidial ciliation, sensilla pattern and protonephridial systems were also included. In this way a number of correlations were revealed. Thus, for example, the number of 5 + 5 marginal hooks correlates with the most primitive monogenean type of spermatozoon and with few sensillae, many ciliated cells and a simple protonephridial system in the oncomiracidium. On the basis of the reviewed data it is concluded that the ancient monogeneans with 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks were divided into two main lines, one retaining unhinged marginal hooks and the other evolving hinged marginal hooks. Both main lines have recent representatives at different marginal hook evolutionary capacity levels, i.e. monogeneans retaining a haptor with only marginal hooks. For the main line with hinged marginal hooks the name Articulon-choinea n. subclass is proposed. Members with 8 + 8 hinged marginal hooks only are here called Proanchorea n. superord. Monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks only are here called Ananchorea n. superord. and three new families are erected for its recent members: Anonchohapteridae n. fam., Acolpentronidae n. fam. and Anacanthoridae n. fam. (with 7 + 7, 8 + 8 and 9 + 9 unhinged marginal hooks, respectively). Except for the families of Articulonchoinea (e.g. Acanthocotylidae, Gyrodactylidae, Tetraonchoididae) Bychowsky's (1957) division of the Monogenea into the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea fits the proposed scheme, i.e. monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks form one old group, the Oligonchoinea, which have 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks, and the other group form the Polyonchoinea, which (with the exception of the Hexabothriidae) has a greater number (7 + 7, 8 + 8 or 9 + 9) of unhinged marginal hooks. It is proposed that both these names, Oligonchoinea (sensu mihi) and Polyonchoinea (sensu mihi), will be retained on one side and Articulonchoinea placed on the other side, which reflects the early monogenean evolution. Except for the members of Ananchorea [Polyonchoinea], all members of the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea have anchors, which imply that they are further evolved, i.e. have passed the 5 + 5 marginal hook evolutionary capacity level (Malmberg, 1986). There are two main types of anchors in the Monogenea: haptoral anchors, with anlages appearing in the haptor, and peduncular anchors, with anlages in the peduncle. There are two types of haptoral anchors: peripheral haptoral anchors, ontogenetically the oldest, and central haptoral anchors. Peduncular anchors, in turn, are ontogenetically younger than peripheral haptoral anchors. There may be two pairs of peduncular anchors: medial peduncular anchors, ontogentically the oldest, and lateral peduncular anchors. Only peduncular (not haptoral) anchors have anchor bars. Monogeneans with haptoral anchors are here called Mediohaptanchorea n. superord. and Laterohaptanchorea n. superord. or haptanchoreans. All oligonchoineans and the oldest polyonchoineans are haptanchoreans. Certain members of Calceostomatidae [Polyonchoinea] are the only monogeneans with both (peripheral) haptoral and peduncular anchors (one pair). These monogeneans are here called Mixanchorea n. superord. Polyonchoineans with peduncular anchors and unhinged marginal hooks are here called the Pedunculanchorea n. superord. The most primitive pedunculanchoreans have only one pair of peduncular anchors with an anchor bar, while the most advanced have both medial and lateral peduncular anchors; each pair having an anchor bar. Certain families of the Articulonchoinea, the Anchorea n. superord., also have peduncular anchors (parallel evolution): only one family, the Sundanonchidae n. fam., has both medial and lateral peduncular anchors, each anchor pair with an anchor bar. Evolutionary lines from different monogenean evolutionary capacity levels are discussed and a new system of classification for the Monogenea is proposed.In agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. EditorIn agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. Editor