氨酰tRNA合成酶作用机制及其应用

氨酰tRNA合成酶（aminoacyl tRNA synthetases, aaRSs）通过催化氨基酸与相应tRNA的氨酰化以保证遗传信息翻译的准确性,在生物体内具有重要作用。近年来,随着对aaRS催化机制理解的不断加深,aaRS的应用逐渐成为研究热点。在细菌中,aaRS活性被抑制后会导致其生命活动发生紊乱,根据aaRS在人体与病原菌内不同的催化特点设计针对病原体的特异性aaRS抑制剂,将有助于开发以aaRS为靶标的新型抗生素。另外,通过突变aaRS可以在蛋白质序列中定点掺入非天然氨基酸,扩展蛋白质工程。本文简述了aaRS的分类、结构与功能的特点,并在此基础上综述了aaRS在研发新型抑制剂,设计改造特殊蛋白质等方面的应用。     

A tRNA aminoacylation system for non-natural amino acids based on a programmable ribozyme

The ability to recognize tRNA identities is essential to the function of the genetic coding system. In translation aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (ARSs) recognize the identities of tRNAs and charge them with their cognate amino acids. We show that an in vitro evolved ribozyme can also discriminate between specific tRNAs, and can transfer amino acids to the 3' ends of cognate tRNAs. The ribozyme interacts with both the CCA-3' terminus and the anticodon loop of tRNA(fMet), and its tRNA specificity is controlled by these interactions. This feature allows us to program the selectivity of the ribozyme toward specific tRNAs, and therefore to tailor effective aminoacyl-transfer catalysts. This method potentially provides a means of generating aminoacyl tRNAs that are charged with non-natural amino acids, which could be incorporated into proteins through cell-free translation.     

Amino acid modifications on tRNA

The accurate formation of cognate aminoacyl-transfer RNAs (aa-tRNAs) is essential for the fidelity of translation. Most amino acids are esterified onto their cognate tRNA isoacceptors directly by aa-tRNA synthetases. However, in the case of four amino acids (Gln, Asn, Cys and Sec), aminoacyl-tRNAs are made through indirect pathways in many organisms across all three domains of life. The process begins with the charging of noncognate amino acids to tRNAs by a specialized synthetase in the case of Cys-tRNA(Cys) formation or by synthetases with relaxed specificity, such as the non-discriminating glutamyl-tRNA, non-discriminating aspartyl-tRNA and seryl-tRNA synthetases. The resulting misacylated tRNAs are then converted to cognate pairs through transformation of the amino acids on the tRNA, which is catalyzed by a group of tRNA-dependent modifying enzymes, such as tRNA-dependent amidotransferases, Sep-tRNA:Cys-tRNA synthase, O-phosphoseryl-tRNA kinase and Sep-tRNA:Sec-tRNA synthase. The majority of these indirect pathways are widely spread in all domains of life and thought to be part of the evolutionary process.     

氨基酰-tRNA合成酶编校相关的生理、病理效应和药物设计

氨基酰．tRNA合成酶（aaRS）催化tRNA的氨基酰化反应,为生物体内蛋白质合成提供原料。许多aaRS为保持蛋白质翻译的精确性,在进化的选择压力下产生了编校功能。近年来,人们越来越多关注aaRS编校功能同人类健康之间的关系。在过去的几年中,对于aaRS编校功能缺陷在细胞内的生理效应,与疾病发生的关系和以编校活性位点作为药靶设计、开发新型抗生素的研究中取得了重要的进展。     

The joint evolution of defence and inducibility against natural enemies

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) ensure the fidelity of the translation of the genetic code, covalently attaching appropriate amino acids to the corresponding nucleic acid adaptor molecules-tRNA. The fundamental role of aminoacylation reaction catalysed by aaRSs implies that representatives of the family are thought to be among the earliest proteins to appear. Based on sequence analysis and catalytic domain structure, aaRSs have been partitioned into two classes of 10 enzymes each. However, based on the structural and sequence data only, it will not be easily understood that the present partitioning is not governed by chance. Our findings suggest that organization of amino acid biosynthetic pathways and clustering of aaRSs into different classes are intimately related to one another. A plausible explanation for such a relationship is dictated by early link between aaRSs and amino acids biosynthetic proteins. The aaRSs catalytic cores are highly relevant to the ancient metabolic reactions, namely, amino acids and cofactors biosynthesis. In particular we show that class II aaRSs mostly associated with the primordial amino acids, while class I aaRSs are usually related to amino acids evolved lately. Reasoning from this we propose a possible chronology of genetic code evolution.     

谷氨酰-脯氨酰-tRNA合成酶的非经典功能——炎症相关基因特异性的翻译沉默

氨基酰-tRNA合成酶（aaRS）催化氨基酰化反应,为生物体内的蛋白质合成提供原料。哺乳动物细胞质中一种双功能aaRS谷氨酰-脯氨酰-tRNA合成酶（EPRS）通常负责将谷氨酸和脯氨酸分别接载到对应的tRNA的3’末端参与蛋白质翻译;此外,它还具有与氨基酰化经典功能无关的单核/巨噬细胞特异性炎症相关基因翻译沉默的非经典功能。在过去的十五年间,对于EPRS参与炎症反应相关基因表达调控的功能研究取得了一系列重要进展,揭示了看家基因EPRS与人类疾病发生和发展的潜在联系。     

Trans-oligomerization of duplicated aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases maintains genetic code fidelity under stress

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) play a key role in deciphering the genetic message by producing charged tRNAs and are equipped with proofreading mechanisms to ensure correct pairing of tRNAs with their cognate amino acid. Duplicated aaRSs are very frequent in Nature, with 25,913 cases observed in 26,837 genomes. The oligomeric nature of many aaRSs raises the question of how the functioning and oligomerization of duplicated enzymes is organized. We characterized this issue in a model prokaryotic organism that expresses two different threonyl-tRNA synthetases, responsible for Thr-tRNA^Thr synthesis: one accurate and constitutively expressed (T1) and another (T2) with impaired proofreading activity that also generates mischarged Ser-tRNA^Thr. Low zinc promotes dissociation of dimeric T1 into monomers deprived of aminoacylation activity and simultaneous induction of T2, which is active for aminoacylation under low zinc. T2 either forms homodimers or heterodimerizes with T1 subunits that provide essential proofreading activity in trans. These findings evidence that in organisms with duplicated genes, cells can orchestrate the assemblage of aaRSs oligomers that meet the necessities of the cell in each situation. We propose that controlled oligomerization of duplicated aaRSs is an adaptive mechanism that can potentially be expanded to the plethora of organisms with duplicated oligomeric aaRSs.     

Exclusive cytosolic localization and broad tRNA<Superscript>Ser</Superscript> specificity of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Arabidopsis thaliana</Emphasis> seryl-tRNA synthetase

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) decipher the genetic code, covalently linking amino acids to cognate tRNAs, thus preparing substrates for the process of translation. Although aaRSs funtion primarily in translation and are localized in cytosol, mitochondria and chloroplasts there are many reports on their additional functions and subcellular destinations beyond translation. However, data on plant aaRSs are scarce. Initial analysis of amino acid sequence of Arabidopsis thaliana seryl-tRNA synthetase (SerRS) suggested that protein contains putative nuclear localization signals. GFP-localization experiments in transiently transformed epidermal onion cells and Arabidopsis protoplasts gave ambiguous results because in some cells SerRS appeared to be dually localized to both cytosol and nucleus. However, data obtained on transgenic lines expressing SerRS-TAP and GFP-SerRS revealed exclusive cytosolic location of SerRS. Subcellular distribution of SerRS did not change during stress. Cytosolic Arabidopsis SerRS was expressed and purified. The enzyme efficiently aminoacylated eukaryotic and bacterial tRNAs^Ser, that are structurally very different. Given the fact that the same behavior was previously shown for monocot maize SerRS, it seems that plant SerRSs exhibit unusually broad tRNA^Ser specificity, unlike SerRSs from other organisms. Possible functional implications of this unique characteristic of plant SerRSs are discussed.     

Relationship of the CCA sequence of tRNA with the early evolutional aspect of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases.

The CCA sequence is common to the 3'-ends of all tRNAs. We investigated the requirement of the CCA sequence in aminoacylation with the cognate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) and several interesting conclusions could be drawn. In tRNAs belonging to the class I aaRSs, decreased aminoacylation activities resulted from the substitution of A76 with a pyrimidine, whereas in tRNAs belonging to the class II aaRSs, decreased aminoacylation activities resulted from the substitution with guanine. The results suggest that aminoacylation of proto-tRNA might have started through the direct hydrophobic (or stacking) interaction between the large, hydrophobic amino acid residue (now utilizing a class I aaRS) of aminoacyl-AMP and the 3'-terminal adenine. The shorter distance between the adenine and the 2'-OH position than the 3'-OH position, and the bulkiness and hydrophobicity of amino acids may be important reasons why class I aaRSs select the 2'-OH position in aminoacylation. Molecular mechanics-based conformation modeling also indicated that the resulting positioning of the adenine and the amino acid residue of 2'-aminoacyl-adenosine for large amino acid is in the vicinity. In contrast, in the case of small amino acids (with class II aaRSs) which would not be able to use the hydrophobic interaction, a protein enzyme might have participated in the aminoacylation reaction from an early stage. The active-site folds of aaRSs belonging to each class reflect the history of evolution: typical nucleotide-binding fold (Rossman fold) in the case of class I aaRSs, and primitive fold which is found also among the family of nonribosomal peptide synthetases in the case of class II aaRSs.     

氨酰-tRNA合成酶维持翻译忠实性的机制

氨酰-tRNA合成酶在维持蛋白质合成忠实性方面具有重要的作用.其忠实性机制可以分为正确地选择底物、转位前编辑、顺式转位后编辑和反式转位后编辑4个水平.不同的氨酰-tRNA合成酶能够利用其中的一种或几种机制,将氨基酸和tRNA连接起来,形成正确的氨酰-tRNA.目前,氨酰-tRNA合成酶的研究超出蛋白质合成,已经延伸到了...     

Mitochondrial translation in absence of local tRNA aminoacylation and methionyl tRNAMet formylation in Apicomplexa

Apicomplexans possess three translationally active compartments: the cytosol, a single tubular mitochondrion, and a vestigial plastid organelle called apicoplast. Mitochondrion and apicoplast are of bacterial evolutionary origin and therefore depend on a bacterial‐like translation machinery. The minimal mitochondrial genome contains only three ORFs, and in Toxoplasma gondii the absence of mitochondrial tRNA genes is compensated for by the import of cytosolic eukaryotic tRNAs. Although all compartments require a complete set of charged tRNAs, the apicomplexan nuclear genomes do not hold sufficient aminoacyl‐tRNA synthetase (aaRSs) genes to be targeted individually to each compartment. This study reveals that aaRSs are either cytosolic, apicoplastic or shared between the two compartments by dual targeting but are absent from the mitochondrion. Consequently, tRNAs are very likely imported in their aminoacylated form. Furthermore, the unexpected absence of tRNA^Met formyltransferase and peptide deformylase implies that the requirement for a specialized formylmethionyl‐tRNA^Met for translation initiation is bypassed in the mitochondrion of Apicomplexa.     

Peripheral neuropathy via mutant tRNA synthetases: Inhibition of protein translation provides a possible explanation

Recent evidence indicates that inhibition of protein translation may be a common pathogenic mechanism for peripheral neuropathy associated with mutant tRNA synthetases (aaRSs). aaRSs are enzymes that ligate amino acids to their cognate tRNA, thus catalyzing the first step of translation. Dominant mutations in five distinct aaRSs cause Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth (CMT) peripheral neuropathy, characterized by length‐dependent degeneration of peripheral motor and sensory axons. Surprisingly, loss of aminoacylation activity is not required for mutant aaRSs to cause CMT. Rather, at least for some mutations, a toxic‐gain‐of‐function mechanism underlies CMT‐aaRS. Interestingly, several mutations in two distinct aaRSs were recently shown to inhibit global protein translation in Drosophila models of CMT‐aaRS, by a mechanism independent of aminoacylation, suggesting inhibition of translation as a common pathogenic mechanism. Future research aimed at elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying the translation defect induced by CMT‐mutant aaRSs should provide novel insight into the molecular pathogenesis of these incurable diseases.     

Structure of human tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase in complex with tRNATrp reveals the molecular basis of tRNA recognition and specificity

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are a family of enzymes responsible for the covalent link of amino acids to their cognate tRNAs. The selectivity and species-specificity in the recognitions of both amino acid and tRNA by aaRSs play a vital role in maintaining the fidelity of protein synthesis. We report here the first crystal structure of human tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase (hTrpRS) in complex with tRNA^Trp and Trp which, together with biochemical data, reveals the molecular basis of a novel tRNA binding and recognition mechanism. hTrpRS recognizes the tRNA acceptor arm from the major groove; however, the 3′ end CCA of the tRNA makes a sharp turn to bind at the active site with a deformed conformation. The discriminator base A73 is specifically recognized by an α-helix of the unique N-terminal domain and the anticodon loop by an α-helix insertion of the C-terminal domain. The N-terminal domain appears to be involved in Trp activation, but not essential for tRNA binding and acylation. Structural and sequence comparisons suggest that this novel tRNA binding and recognition mechanism is very likely shared by other archaeal and eukaryotic TrpRSs, but not by bacterial TrpRSs. Our findings provide insights into the molecular basis of tRNA specificity and species-specificity.     

Transfer RNA: A dancer between charging and mis-charging for protein biosynthesis

Transfer RNA plays a fundamental role in the protein biosynthesis as an adaptor molecule by functioning as a biological link between the genetic nucleotide sequence in the mRNA and the amino acid sequence in the protein. To perform its role in protein biosynthesis, it has to be accurately recognized by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) to generate aminoacyl-tRNAs (aa-tRNAs). The correct pairing between an amino acid with its cognate tRNA is crucial for translational quality control. Production and utilization of mis-charged tRNAs are usually detrimental for all the species, resulting in cellular dysfunctions. Correct aa-tRNAs formation is collectively controlled by aaRSs with distinct mechanisms and/or other trans-factors. However, in very limited instances, mis-charged tRNAs are intermediate for specific pathways or essential components for the translational machinery. Here, from the point of accuracy in tRNA charging, we review our understanding about the mechanism ensuring correct aa-tRNA generation. In addition, some unique mis-charged tRNA species necessary for the organism are also briefly described.     

Molecular Evolution of Aminoacyl tRNA Synthetase Proteins in the Early History of Life

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRS) consist of several families of functionally conserved proteins essential for translation and protein synthesis. Like nearly all components of the translation machinery, most aaRS families are universally distributed across cellular life, being inherited from the time of the Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA). However, unlike the rest of the translation machinery, aaRS have undergone numerous ancient horizontal gene transfers, with several independent events detected between domains, and some possibly involving lineages diverging before the time of LUCA. These transfers reveal the complexity of molecular evolution at this early time, and the chimeric nature of genomes within cells that gave rise to the major domains. Additionally, given the role of these protein families in defining the amino acids used for protein synthesis, sequence reconstruction of their pre-LUCA ancestors can reveal the evolutionary processes at work in the origin of the genetic code. In particular, sequence reconstructions of the paralog ancestors of isoleucyl- and valyl- RS provide strong empirical evidence that at least for this divergence, the genetic code did not co-evolve with the aaRSs; rather, both amino acids were already part of the genetic code before their cognate aaRSs diverged from their common ancestor. The implications of this observation for the early evolution of RNA-directed protein biosynthesis are discussed.     

On the origin of the translation system and the genetic code in the RNA world by means of natural selection, exaptation, and subfunctionalization

Background  

The origin of the translation system is, arguably, the central and the hardest problem in the study of the origin of life, and one of the hardest in all evolutionary biology. The problem has a clear catch-22 aspect: high translation fidelity hardly can be achieved without a complex, highly evolved set of RNAs and proteins but an elaborate protein machinery could not evolve without an accurate translation system. The origin of the genetic code and whether it evolved on the basis of a stereochemical correspondence between amino acids and their cognate codons (or anticodons), through selectional optimization of the code vocabulary, as a "frozen accident" or via a combination of all these routes is another wide open problem despite extensive theoretical and experimental studies. Here we combine the results of comparative genomics of translation system components, data on interaction of amino acids with their cognate codons and anticodons, and data on catalytic activities of ribozymes to develop conceptual models for the origins of the translation system and the genetic code.