Mycobacterium tuberculosis UvrB forms dimers in solution and interacts with UvrA in the absence of ligands

During its life cycle Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) must face a variety of environmental and endogenous physical and chemical stresses that could produce genotoxic damage. However, MTB possesses efficient systems to counteract the harmful effects of DNA‐damaging assaults. The nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a highly conserved multi‐enzymatic cascade that is initiated by the concerted action of three core proteins, that is UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC. Although the functional roles of these enzymes are well characterized, the intra‐pathway coordination of the NER components and the dynamics of their association is still a matter of debate. In the presented study, we analyzed the hydrodynamic properties and the oligomeric state of the MTB UvrB protein (MtUvrB) that we expressed and purified to homogeneity in a tag‐free form. Our results show that, differently to what has been previously observed for the His‐tagged version of the protein, MtUvrB forms dimers in solution, which are characterized by an elongated shape, as determined by small‐angle X‐ray scattering analysis. Moreover, to gain insights into the mycobacterial UvrA/UvrB lesion sensing/tracking complex we adopted a size‐exclusion chromatography‐based approach, revealing that the two proteins interact in the absence of ligands, leading to the assembling of A₂B₂ hetero‐tetramers in solution. Surface plasmon resonance analysis showed that the dissociation constant of the MtUvrA/MtUvrB complex falls in the low micromolar range that could represent the basis for a fine modulation of the complex architecture accompanying the multi‐step DNA repair activity of mycobacterial NER.     

The presence of two UvrB subunits in the UvrAB complex ensures damage detection in both DNA strands

It is generally accepted that the damage recognition complex of nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli consists of two UvrA and one UvrB molecule, and that in the preincision complex UvrB binds to the damage as a monomer. Using scanning force microscopy, we show here that the damage recognition complex consists of two UvrA and two UvrB subunits, with the DNA wrapped around one of the UvrB monomers. Upon binding the damage and release of the UvrA subunits, UvrB remains a dimer in the preincision complex. After association with the UvrC protein, one of the UvrB monomers is released. We propose a model in which the presence of two UvrB subunits ensures damage recognition in both DNA strands. Upon binding of the UvrA(2)B(2) complex to a putative damaged site, the DNA wraps around one of the UvrB monomers, which will subsequently probe one of the DNA strands for the presence of a lesion. When no damage is found, the DNA will wrap around the second UvrB subunit, which will check the other strand for aberrations.     

Dynamics of the UvrABC nucleotide excision repair proteins analyzed by fluorescence resonance energy transfer

UvrB plays a key role in bacterial nucleotide excision repair. It is the ultimate damage-binding protein that interacts with both UvrA and UvrC. The oligomeric state of UvrB and the UvrAB complex have been subject of debate for a long time. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between GFP and YFP fused to the C-terminal end of Escherichia coli UvrB, we unambiguously show that in solution two UvrB subunits bind to UvrA, most likely as part of a UvrA2B2 complex. This complex is most stable when both UvrA and UvrB are in the ATP-bound form. Analysis of a truncated form of UvrB shows that binding to UvrA promotes dimerization of the two C-terminal domain 4 regions of UvrB. The presence of undamaged DNA leads to dissociation of the UvrA2B2 complex, but when the ATPase site of UvrB is inactivated, the complex is trapped on the DNA. When the complex is bound to a damaged site, FRET between the two UvrB subunits could still be detected, but only as long as UvrA remains associated. Dissociation of UvrA from the damage-bound UvrB dimer leads to the reduction of the magnitude of the FRET signal, indicating that the domain 4 regions no longer interact. We propose that the UvrA-induced dimerization of the domain 4 regions serves to shield these domains from premature UvrC binding. Only after specific binding of the UvrB dimer to a damaged site and subsequent release of UvrA is the contact between the domain 4 regions broken, allowing recruitment of UvrC and subsequent incisions.     

Interactions between UvrA and UvrB: the role of UvrB's domain 2 in nucleotide excision repair

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a highly conserved DNA repair mechanism present in all kingdoms of life. UvrB is a central component of the bacterial NER system, participating in damage recognition, strand excision and repair synthesis. None of the three presently available crystal structures of UvrB has defined the structure of domain 2, which is critical for the interaction with UvrA. We have solved the crystal structure of the UvrB Y96A variant, which reveals a new fold for domain 2 and identifies highly conserved residues located on its surface. These residues are restricted to the face of UvrB important for DNA binding and may be critical for the interaction of UvrB with UvrA. We have mutated these residues to study their role in the incision reaction, formation of the pre-incision complex, destabilization of short duplex regions in DNA, binding to UvrA and ATP hydrolysis. Based on the structural and biochemical data, we conclude that domain 2 is required for a productive UvrA-UvrB interaction, which is a pre-requisite for all subsequent steps in nucleotide excision repair.     

The beta -hairpin motif of UvrB is essential for DNA binding, damage processing, and UvrC-mediated incisions.

UvrB plays a major role in recognition and processing of DNA lesions during nucleotide excision repair. The crystal structure of UvrB revealed a similar fold as found in monomeric DNA helicases. Homology modeling suggested that the beta-hairpin motif of UvrB might be involved in DNA binding (Theis, K., Chen, P. J., Skorvaga, M., Van Houten, B., and Kisker, C. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 6899-6907). To determine a role of the beta-hairpin of Bacillus caldotenax UvrB, we have constructed a deletion mutant, Deltabetah UvrB, which lacks residues Gln-97-Asp-112 of the beta-hairpin. Deltabetah UvrB does not form a stable UvrB-DNA pre-incision complex and is inactive in UvrABC-mediated incision. However, Deltabetah UvrB is able to bind to UvrA and form a complex with UvrA and damaged DNA, competing with wild type UvrB. In addition, Deltabetah UvrB shows wild type-like ATPase activity in complex with UvrA that is stimulated by damaged DNA. In contrast to wild type UvrB, the ATPase activity of mutant UvrB does not lead to a destabilization of the damaged duplex. These results indicate that the conserved beta-hairpin motif is a major factor in DNA binding.     

Crystal structure of Thermus thermophilus HB8 UvrB protein, a key enzyme of nucleotide excision repair

In the nucleotide excision repair system, UvrB plays a central role in damage recognition and DNA incision by interacting with UvrA and UvrC. We have determined the crystal structure of Thermus thermophilus HB8 UvrB at 1.9 A resolution. UvrB comprises four domains, two of which have an alpha/beta structure resembling the core domains of DNA and RNA helicases. Additionally, UvrB has an alpha-helical domain and a domain consisting of antiparallel beta-sheets (beta-domain). The sequence similarity suggests that the beta-domain interacts with UvrA. Based on the distribution of the conserved regions and the structure of the PcrA-DNA complex, a model for the UvrB-DNA complex is proposed.     

A Structural Model for the Damage-sensing Complex in Bacterial Nucleotide Excision Repair

Nucleotide excision repair is distinguished from other DNA repair pathways by its ability to process a wide range of structurally unrelated DNA lesions. In bacteria, damage recognition is achieved by the UvrA·UvrB ensemble. Here, we report the structure of the complex between the interaction domains of UvrA and UvrB. These domains are necessary and sufficient for full-length UvrA and UvrB to associate and thereby form the DNA damage-sensing complex of bacterial nucleotide excision repair. The crystal structure and accompanying biochemical analyses suggest a model for the complete damage-sensing complex.Nucleotide excision repair is distinguished from other DNA repair pathways by its ability to process a diverse set of lesions. In bacteria, the initial steps are carried out by three proteins: UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC. The UvrA·UvrB complex conducts surveillance of DNA and recognizes damage. Having located a lesion, UvrA “loads” UvrB onto the DNA at the damaged sites and then dissociates. Damage searching, formation of the UvrB·DNA “preincision” complex, and dissociation of UvrA are regulated by ATP (1). UvrB subsequently recruits the endonuclease UvrC, which catalyzes incisions on either side of the lesion (2, 3). Following incision, UvrC and the damage-containing oligonucleotide are removed by UvrD (helicase II), whereas UvrB remains bound to the gapped DNA and recruits DNA polymerase I for repair synthesis. Sealing of the single-stranded nick completes the repair process and restores the original DNA sequence (4).Since its discovery more than 40 years ago, bacterial nucleotide excision repair has been extensively studied, resulting in a large body of work that describes the protein components and the details of how they operate. Notwithstanding the trove of genetic and biochemical data, several key questions remain unanswered. For example, how does the same set of proteins handle a diverse set of lesions while maintaining specificity? How do UvrA and UvrB cooperate during damage recognition, and what is the precise role of ATP? Ongoing studies in the field, including those described below, aim to address these issues.Recently, we reported the structure of Geobacillus stearothermophilus UvrA and the identification of binding sites for DNA and UvrB (5). We also established that the identified UvrB-binding domain is necessary and sufficient to mediate the UvrA-UvrB interaction and that the isolated interaction domains of UvrA (5) and UvrB (6) bind to each other in solution.To understand the interaction between UvrA and UvrB, we have determined the crystal structure of the complex between the two isolated interaction domains. The structure revealed that UvrA-UvrB interaction interface is largely polar, mediated by several highly conserved charged residues. Site-directed mutagenesis and biochemical characterization of the mutant proteins confirmed the importance of the observed interactions. Based on the interaction domain complex structure, we have constructed a structural model for the full-length UvrA·UvrB ensemble and propose two models for lesion recognition that will serve as a basis for future experiments.     

DNase I footprint of ABC excinuclease

The incision and excision steps of nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli are mediated by ABC excinuclease, a multisubunit enzyme composed of three proteins, UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC. To determine the DNA contact sites and the binding affinity of ABC excinuclease for damaged DNA, it is necessary to engineer a DNA fragment uniquely modified at one nucleotide. We have recently reported the construction of a 40 base pair (bp) DNA fragment containing a psoralen adduct at a central TpA sequence (Van Houten, B., Gamper, H., Hearst, J. E., and Sancar, A. (1986a) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 14135-14141). Using similar methodology a 137-bp fragment containing a psoralen-thymine adduct was synthesized, and this substrate was used in DNase I-footprinting experiments with the subunits of ABC excinuclease. It was found that the UvrA subunit binds specifically to the psoralen modified 137-bp fragment with an apparent equilibrium constant of K8 = 0.7 - 1.5 X 10(8) M-1, while protecting a 33-bp region surrounding the DNA adduct. The equilibrium constant for the nonspecific binding of UvrA was Kns = 0.7 - 2.9 X 10(5) M-1 (bp). In the presence of the UvrB subunit, the binding affinity of UvrA for the damaged substrate increased to K8 = 1.2 - 6.7 X 10(8) M-1 while the footprint shrunk to 19 bp. In addition the binding of the UvrA and UvrB subunits to the damaged substrate caused the 11th phosphodiester bond 5' to the psoralen-modified thymine to become hypersensitive to DNase I cleavage. These observations provide evidence of an alteration in the DNA conformation which occurs during the formation of the ternary UvrA.UvrB.DNA complex. The addition of the UvrC subunit to the UvrA.UvrB.DNA complex resulted in incisions on both sides of the adduct but did not cause any detectable change in the footprint. Experiments with shorter psoralen-modified DNA fragments (20-40 bp) indicated that ABC excinuclease is capable of incising a DNA fragment extending either 3 or 1 bp beyond the normal 5' or 3' incision sites, respectively. These results suggest that the DNA beyond the incision sites, while contributing to ABC excinuclease-DNA complex formation, is not essential for cleavage to occur.     

Crystal structure of the UvrB dimer: insights into the nature and functioning of the UvrAB damage engagement and UvrB-DNA complexes

UvrB has a central role in the highly conserved UvrABC pathway functioning not only as a damage recognition element but also as an essential component of the lesion tracking machinery. While it has been recently confirmed that the tracking assembly comprises a UvrA(2)B(2) heterotetramer, the configurations of the damage engagement and UvrB-DNA handover complexes remain obscure. Here, we present the first crystal structure of a UvrB dimer whose biological significance has been verified using both chemical cross-linking and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. We demonstrate that this dimeric species stably associates with UvrA and forms a UvrA(2)B(2)-DNA complex. Our studies also illustrate how signals are transduced between the ATP and DNA binding sites to generate the helicase activity pivotal to handover and formation of the UvrB(2)-DNA complex, providing key insights into the configurations of these important repair intermediates.     

Role of the two ATPase domains of Escherichia coli UvrA in binding non-bulky DNA lesions and interaction with UvrB

The UvrA protein is the initial DNA damage-sensing protein in bacterial nucleotide excision repair and detects a wide variety of structurally unrelated lesions. After initial recognition of DNA damage, UvrA loads the UvrB protein onto the DNA. This protein then verifies the presence of a lesion, after which UvrA is released from the DNA.UvrA contains two ATPase domains, both belonging to the ABC ATPase superfamily. We have determined the activities of two mutants, in which a single domain was deactivated. Inactivation of either one ATPase domain in Escherichia coli UvrA results in a complete loss of ATPase activity, indicating that both domains function in a cooperative way. We could show that this ATPase activity is not required for the recognition of bulky lesions by UvrA, but it does promote the specific binding to the less distorting cyclobutane–pyrimidine dimer (CPD). The two ATPase mutants also show a difference in UvrB-loading, depending on the length of the DNA substrate. The ATPase domain I mutant was capable of loading UvrB on a lesion in a 50 bp fragment, but this loading was reduced on a longer substrate. For the ATPase domain II mutant the opposite was found: UvrB could not be loaded on a 50 bp substrate, but this loading was rescued when the length of the fragment was increased. This differential loading of UvrB by the two ATPase mutants could be related to different interactions between the UvrA and UvrB subunits.     

The solution structure and dynamics of the DH‐PH module of PDZRhoGEF in isolation and in complex with nucleotide‐free RhoA

The DH‐PH domain tandems of Dbl‐homology guanine nucleotide exchange factors catalyze the exchange of GTP for GDP in Rho‐family GTPases, and thus initiate a wide variety of cellular signaling cascades. Although several crystal structures of complexes of DH‐PH tandems with cognate, nucleotide free Rho GTPases are known, they provide limited information about the dynamics of the complex and it is not clear how accurately they represent the structures in solution. We used a complementary combination of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS), and hydrogen‐deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (DXMS) to study the solution structure and dynamics of the DH‐PH tandem of RhoA‐specific exchange factor PDZRhoGEF, both in isolation and in complex with nucleotide free RhoA. We show that in solution the DH‐PH tandem behaves as a rigid entity and that the mutual disposition of the DH and PH domains remains identical within experimental error to that seen in the crystal structure of the complex, thus validating the latter as an accurate model of the complex in vivo. We also show that the nucleotide‐free RhoA exhibits elevated dynamics when in complex with DH‐PH, a phenomenon not observed in the crystal structure, presumably due to the restraining effects of crystal contacts. The complex is readily and rapidly dissociated in the presence of both GDP and GTP nucleotides, with no evidence of intermediate ternary complexes.     

The C-terminal zinc finger of UvrA does not bind DNA directly but regulates damage-specific DNA binding

In prokaryotic nucleotide excision repair, UvrA recognizes DNA perturbations and recruits UvrB for the recognition and processing steps in the reaction. One of the most remarkable aspects of UvrA is that it can recognize a wide range of DNA lesions that differ in chemistry and structure. However, how UvrA interacts with DNA is unknown. To examine the role that the UvrA C-terminal zinc finger domain plays in DNA binding, an eleven amino acid deletion was constructed (ZnG UvrA). Biochemical characterization of the ZnG UvrA protein was carried out using UvrABC DNA incision, DNA binding and ATPase assays. Although ZnG UvrA was able to bind dsDNA slightly better than wild-type UvrA, the ZnG UvrA mutant only supported 50-75% of wild type incision. Surprisingly, the ZnG UvrA mutant, while retaining its ability to bind dsDNA, did not support damage-specific binding. Furthermore, this mutant protein only provided 10% of wild-type Bca UvrA complementation for UV survival of an uvrA deletion strain. In addition, ZnG UvrA failed to stimulate the UvrB DNA damage-associated ATPase activity. Electrophoretic mobility shift analysis was used to monitor UvrB loading onto damaged DNA with wild-type UvrA or ZnG UvrA. The ZnG UvrA protein showed a 30-60% reduction in UvrB loading as compared with the amount of UvrB loaded by wild-type UvrA. These data demonstrate that the C-terminal zinc finger of UvrA is required for regulation of damage-specific DNA binding.     

Investigation of bacterial nucleotide excision repair using single-molecule techniques

Despite three decades of biochemical and structural analysis of the prokaryotic nucleotide excision repair (NER) system, many intriguing questions remain with regard to how the UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC proteins detect, verify and remove a wide range of DNA lesions. Single-molecule techniques have begun to allow more detailed understanding of the kinetics and action mechanism of this complex process. This article reviews how atomic force microscopy and fluorescence microscopy have captured new glimpses of how these proteins work together to mediate NER.     

Identification of the different intermediates in the interaction of (A)BC excinuclease with its substrates by DNase I footprinting on two uniquely modified oligonucleotides

(A)BC excinuclease is the enzymatic activity resulting from the joint actions of UvrA, UvrB and UvrC proteins of Escherichia coli. The enzyme removes from DNA many types of adducts of dissimilar structures with different efficiencies. To understand the mechanism of substrate recognition and the basis of enzyme specificity, we investigated the interactions of the three subunits with two synthetic substrates, one containing a psoralen-thymine monoadduct and the other a thymine dimer. Using DNase I as a probe, we found that UvrA makes a 33 base-pair footprint around the psoralen-thymine adduct and that UvrA-UvrB make a 45 base-pair asymmetric footprint characterized by a hypersensitive site 11 nucleotides 5' to the adduct and protection mostly on the 3' side of the damage. Conditions that favor dissociation of UvrA from the UvrA-UvrB-DNA complex, such as addition of excess undamaged DNA to the reaction mixture, resulted in the formation of a 19 base-pair UvrB footprint. In contrast, a thymine dimer in a similar sequence context failed to elicit a UvrA, a UvrA-UvrB or UvrB footprint and gave rise to a relatively weak DNase I hypersensitive site typical of a UvrA-UvrB complex. Dissociation of UvrA from the UvrA-UvrB-DNA complex stimulated the rate of incision of both substrates upon addition of UvrC, leading us to conclude that UvrA is not a part of the incision complex and that it actually interferes with incision. The extent of incision of the two substrates upon addition of UvrC (70% for the psoralen adduct and 20% for the thymine dimer) was proportional to the extent of formation of the UvrA-UvrB-DNA (i.e. UvrB-DNA) complex, indicating that substrate discrimination occurs at the preincision step.     

Sequences of the E. coli uvrB gene and protein.

The UvrB protein is one of the three subunits of the E. coli ABC excinuclease. We have reported the sequences of the other two subunits, the UvrA and UvrC proteins. In this paper the sequence of the UvrB protein is presented. The protein sequence was determined from the DNA sequence of the uvrB gene and was confirmed by sequencing the NH2-terminus of the UvrB protein and analyzing its overall amino acid composition. The coding region of uvrB is 2019 basepairs, specifying a protein of 672 amino acids and Mr of 76,118. The sequence of the UvrB protein shows a moderate level of homology to that of the UvrC protein and to the ATP binding site of the UvrA protein. During purification of UvrB protein a proteolytic product, UvrB, is produced in high quantities. We find that UvrB results from removal of about 40 amino acids from the COOH-terminus of the UvrB protein. The uvrB gene has complex regulatory features. On the 5' side, the coding region is preceded by 3 promoters, a DnaA box and an SOS box. On the 3' side the gene is followed by an REP (Repetitive Extragenic Palindrome) sequence which has been implicated in gene regulation by an unknown mechanism.     

Determination of protein oligomeric structure from small‐angle X‐ray scattering

Small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS) is useful for determining the oligomeric states and quaternary structures of proteins in solution. The average molecular mass in solution can be calculated directly from a single SAXS curve collected on an arbitrary scale from a sample of unknown protein concentration without the need for beamline calibration or protein standards. The quaternary structure in solution can be deduced by comparing the experimental SAXS curve to theoretical curves calculated from proposed models of the oligomer. This approach is especially robust when the crystal structure of the target protein is known, and the candidate oligomer models are derived from the crystal lattice. When SAXS data are obtained at multiple protein concentrations, this analysis can provide insight into dynamic self‐association equilibria. Herein, we summarize the computational methods that are used to determine protein molecular mass and quaternary structure from SAXS data. These methods are organized into a workflow and demonstrated with four case studies using experimental SAXS data from the published literature.     

Structure and function of the (A)BC excinuclease of Escherichia coli

(A)BC excinuclease is the enzymatic activity resulting from the mixture of E. coli UvrA, UvrB and UvrC proteins with damaged DNA. This is a functional definition as new evidence suggests that the three proteins never associate in a ternary complex. The UvrA subunit associates with the UvrB subunit in the form of an A2B1 complex which, guided by UvrA's affinity for damaged DNA binds to a lesion in DNA and delivers the UvrB subunit to the damaged site. The UvrB-damaged DNA complex is extremely stable (t1/2 congruent to 100 min). The UvrC subunit, which has no specific affinity for damaged DNA, recognizes the UvrB-DNA complex with high specificity and the protein complex consisting of UvrB and UvrC proteins makes two incisions, the 8th phosphodiester bond 5' and the 5th phosphodiester bond 3' to the damaged nucleotide. (A)BC excinuclease recognizes DNA damage ranging from AP sites and thymine glycols to pyrimidine dimers, and the adducts of psoralen, cisplatinum, mitomycin C, 4-nitroquinoline oxide and interstrand crosslinks.     

Analyzing the handoff of DNA from UvrA to UvrB utilizing DNA-protein photoaffinity labeling

To better define the molecular architecture of nucleotide excision repair intermediates it is necessary to identify the specific domains of UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC that are in close proximity to DNA damage during the repair process. One key step of nucleotide excision repair that is poorly understood is the transfer of damaged DNA from UvrA to UvrB, prior to incision by UvrC. To study this transfer, we have utilized two types of arylazido-modified photoaffinity reagents that probe residues in the Uvr proteins that are closest to either the damaged or non-damaged strands. The damaged strand probes consisted of dNTP analogs linked to a terminal arylazido moiety. These analogs were incorporated into double-stranded DNA using DNA polymerase beta and functioned as both the damage site and the cross-linking reagent. The non-damaged strand probe contained an arylazido moiety coupled to a phosphorothioate-modified backbone of an oligonucleotide opposite the damaged strand, which contained an internal fluorescein adduct. Six site-directed mutants of Bacillus caldotenax UvrB located in different domains within the protein (Y96A, E99A, R123A, R183E, F249A, and D510A), and two domain deletions (Delta2 and Deltabeta-hairpin), were assayed. Data gleaned from these mutants suggest that the handoff of damaged DNA from UvrA to UvrB proceeds in a three-step process: 1) UvrA and UvrB bind to the damaged site, with UvrA in direct contact; 2) a transfer reaction with UvrB contacting mostly the non-damaged DNA strand; 3) lesion engagement by the damage recognition pocket of UvrB with concomitant release of UvrA.     

Electron microscopic study of (A)BC excinuclease. DNA is sharply bent in the UvrB-DNA complex.

Nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli is initiated by the UvrA, UvrB and UvrC proteins. UvrA is the damage recognition subunit, makes an A2B1 complex with the targeting subunit UvrB, and the complex binds to the lesion site; UvrA dissociates leaving behind a very stable UvrB-DNA complex that is recognized by the trigger subunit, UvrC, and the ensuing UvrB-UvrC heterodimer makes two incisions, one on either side of the lesion. Using electron microscopy, we investigated the structures of these early A, A-B intermediates on DNA containing ultraviolet light photoproducts. UvrA, which is known to bind to DNA as a dimer and produce a DNase I footprint of 33 base-pairs does not change the trajectory of DNA appreciably. The A2B1 complex clearly shows a bipartite structure and its effect on the trajectory of the DNA was not consistently straight or kinked. In contrast, the DNA in the preincision UvrB-DNA complex appears to be severely kinked; 43% of the molecules are bent by 80 degrees or more, with an average bending angle of 127 degrees. It appears that protein-induced bending is an important step on the pathway leading to excision of the damaged nucleotide by (A)BC excinuclease.