首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到2条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
Luísa Gigante Carvalheiro  Jacobus Christiaan Biesmeijer  Gita Benadi  Jochen Fründ  Martina Stang  Ignasi Bartomeus  Christopher N. Kaiser‐Bunbury  Mathilde Baude  Sofia I. F. Gomes  Vincent Merckx  Katherine C. R. Baldock  Andrew T. D. Bennett  Ruth Boada  Riccardo Bommarco  Ralph Cartar  Natacha Chacoff  Juliana Dänhardt  Lynn V. Dicks  Carsten F. Dormann  Johan Ekroos  Kate S.E. Henson  Andrea Holzschuh  Robert R. Junker  Martha Lopezaraiza‐Mikel  Jane Memmott  Ana Montero‐Castaño  Isabel L. Nelson  Theodora Petanidou  Eileen F. Power  Maj Rundlöf  Henrik G. Smith  Jane C. Stout  Kehinde Temitope  Teja Tscharntke  Thomas Tscheulin  Montserrat Vilà  William E. Kunin 《Ecology letters》2014,17(11):1389-1399
Co‐flowering plant species commonly share flower visitors, and thus have the potential to influence each other's pollination. In this study we analysed 750 quantitative plant–pollinator networks from 28 studies representing diverse biomes worldwide. We show that the potential for one plant species to influence another indirectly via shared pollinators was greater for plants whose resources were more abundant (higher floral unit number and nectar sugar content) and more accessible. The potential indirect influence was also stronger between phylogenetically closer plant species and was independent of plant geographic origin (native vs. non‐native). The positive effect of nectar sugar content and phylogenetic proximity was much more accentuated for bees than for other groups. Consequently, the impact of these factors depends on the pollination mode of plants, e.g. bee or fly pollinated. Our findings may help predict which plant species have the greatest importance in the functioning of plant–pollination networks.  相似文献   

2.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号