Splenogonadal Fusion: An Unusual Case of an Acute Scrotum

We highlight a case on a normal left testicle with a fibrovascular cord with three nodules consistent with splenic tissue. The torsed splenule demonstrated hemorrhage with neutrophilic infiltrate and thrombus consistent with chronic infarction and torsion. Splenogonadal fusion (SGF) is a rather rare entity, with approximately 184 cases reported in the literature. The most comprehensive review was that of 123 cases completed by Carragher in 1990. Since then, an additional 61 cases have been reported in the scientific literature. We have studied these 61 cases in detail and have included a summary of that information here.Key words: Splenogonadal fusion, Acute scrotumA 10-year-old boy presented with worsening left-sided scrotal pain of 12 hours’ duration. The patient reported similar previous episodes occurring intermittently over the past several months. His past medical history was significant for left hip dysplasia, requiring multiple hip surgeries. On examination, he was found to have an edematous left hemiscrotum with a left testicle that was rigid, tender, and noted to be in a transverse lie. The ultrasound revealed possible polyorchism, with two testicles on the left and one on the right (Figure 1), and left epididymitis. One of the left testicles demonstrated a loss of blood flow consistent with testicular torsion (Figure 2).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Ultrasound of the left hemiscrotum reveals two spherical structures; the one on the left is heterogeneous and hyperdense in comparison to the right.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Doppler ultrasound of left hemiscrotum. No evidence of blood flow to left spherical structure.The patient was taken to the operating room for immediate scrotal exploration. A normalappearing left testicle with a normal epididymis was noted. However, two accessory structures were noted, one of which was torsed 720°; (Figure 3). An inguinal incision was then made and a third accessory structure was noted. All three structures were connected with fibrous tissue, giving a “rosary bead” appearance. The left accessory structures were removed, a left testicular biopsy was taken, and bilateral scrotal orchipexies were performed.Open in a separate windowFigure 3Torsed accessory spleen with splenogonadal fusion.Pathology revealed a normal left testicle with a fibrovascular cord with three nodules consistent with splenic tissue. The torsed splenule demonstrated hemorrhage with neutrophillic infiltrate and thrombus consistent with chronic infarction and torsion (Figure 4).Open in a separate windowFigure 4Splenogonadal fusion, continuous type with three accessory structures.     

Latency of the Lipid A Deacylase PagL Is Involved in Producing a Robust Permeation Barrier in the Outer Membrane of Salmonella enterica

Lipid A deacylase PagL, which detoxifies endotoxin, is latent in Salmonella enterica. This study determined the biological significance of this latency. PagL latency was beneficial for bacteria in producing a robust permeation barrier through lipid A modifications under host-mimetic conditions that induced the modification enzymes, including PagL.The outer layer of the outer membrane in enteric Gram-negative bacteria is exclusively occupied by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which contains lipid A as the membrane anchor, while the inner layer contains phospholipids. This asymmetric lipid bilayer serves as a permeation barrier to a large number of noxious compounds. The strength of this barrier is due to the strong lateral interactions between LPS molecules and the low fluidity of the saturated fatty acid portion of lipid A in the outer membrane (reviewed in reference 20). Large hydrophilic compounds are excluded by narrow porin channels, and lipophilic compounds cross the asymmetric bilayer very slowly.The prototype lipid A structure synthesized in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) is shown in Fig. ​Fig.11 A. In S. Typhimurium, lipid A is further modified by enzymes that are induced upon activation of the two-component regulatory system PhoP-PhoQ (Fig. ​(Fig.1B)1B) (9). PhoP-PhoQ is essential for Salmonella virulence (3, 6, 18), and PhoP-PhoQ-regulated lipid A modifications are involved in many aspects of virulence. PhoQ is a sensor histidine kinase that responds to environmental conditions, including those within mammalian tissues. The host environment is experimentally mimicked by magnesium limitation and/or mild acid pH in the culture medium (3, 4, 6, 18, 21). In response to specific environmental signals, PhoQ phosphorylates PhoP, leading to the activation of pagL and pagP, which encode outer membrane lipid A 3-O-deacylase and outer membrane lipid A palmitoyltransferase, respectively (2, 22). Lipid A 3-O-deacylation by PagL and palmitoylation by PagP reduce the ability of lipid A to activate host Toll-like receptor 4, indicating that PhoP-PhoQ-dependent lipid A modifications help pathogens evade innate immune recognition (12). The regulation of lpxO, which encodes lipid A hydroxylase, is also mediated, at least in part, by PhoP-PhoQ (5, 9). Activation of PhoP-PhoQ leads to the activation of a second two-component regulatory system, PmrA-PmrB (8, 10). PmrA-PmrB promotes the attachment of aminoarabinose and phosphoethanolamine to phosphate groups on lipid A, which are involved in bacterial resistance to cationic antimicrobial peptides (7, 15). Furthermore, PhoP-PhoQ activation produces a more robust permeation barrier in the outer membrane, and lipid A modifications are involved in the generation of this enhanced barrier (19). Mg²⁺ ions decreased membrane permeability strongly in a phoP-null strain but only modestly in a PhoP-constitutive strain (19), implying a biological relevance of lipid A modifications by magnesium limitation.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Structures of the prototype lipid A (A) and modified lipid A (B) of S. Typhimurium.Previous studies did not detect PagL-dependent lipid A deacylation when S. Typhimurium was grown under PhoP-PhoQ-activating conditions that induce PagL expression (11, 13, 22). In contrast, PagL-dependent lipid A deacylation was observed in pmrA-null and pmrE-null strains, both of which lacked aminoarabinose modification of lipid A (11, 13). These findings cannot be simply ascribed to the substrate specificity of PagL, since many lipid A species that are not modified with aminoarabinose exist in S. Typhimurium grown under PhoP-PhoQ-activating conditions (13). Therefore, it is thought that PagL is latent under these conditions and that aminoarabinose modification of lipid A is involved in the regulation of latency (13). PagL latency is consistent with an emerging paradigm of outer membrane enzyme regulation (1). It should be noted that PagL-dependent lipid A deacylation, which is beneficial for invading bacteria by allowing them to avoid Toll-like receptor 4 responses, would occur under some specific conditions such as those which activate PhoP-PhoQ without induction of lipid A aminoarabinose modification. Furthermore, we have identified several amino acid residues in the extracellular loops of PagL that are essential for latency but not for deacylase activity (17). The amino acid residues essential for latency were also necessary for PagL to associate with LPS (16). However, the biological significance of latency remains unknown.The influx rate of a lipophilic agent, ethidium bromide, is increased by a pmrA-null mutation in an S. Typhimurium strain with a PhoP-constitutive phenotype (19). The rate-limiting step of this influx is crossing of the asymmetric bilayer in the outer membrane. Therefore, these observations suggest that pmrA-dependent lipid A modifications, such as aminoarabinose and phosphoethanolamine attachment, help generate a more robust permeation barrier through PhoP-PhoQ activation. On the other hand, lipid A is deacylated by PagL in a pmrA strain under PhoP-PhoQ-activating conditions (13). These observations led us to examine whether PagL-dependent lipid A deacylation increases the membrane permeability of the pmrA mutant strain.     

Conformational States of Melittin at a Bilayer Interface

The distribution of peptide conformations in the membrane interface is central to partitioning energetics. Molecular-dynamics simulations enable characterization of in-membrane structural dynamics. Here, we describe melittin partitioning into dioleoylphosphatidylcholine lipids using CHARMM and OPLS force fields. Although the OPLS simulation failed to reproduce experimental results, the CHARMM simulation reported was consistent with experiments. The CHARMM simulation showed melittin to be represented by a narrow distribution of folding states in the membrane interface.Unstructured peptides fold into the membrane interface because partitioned hydrogen-bonded peptide bonds are energetically favorable compared to free peptide bonds (1–3). This folding process is central to the mechanisms of antimicrobial and cell-penetrating peptides, as well as to lipid interactions and stabilities of larger membrane proteins (4). The energetics of peptide partitioning into membrane interfaces can be described by a thermodynamic cycle (Fig. 1). State A is a theoretical state representing the fully unfolded peptide in water, B is the unfolded peptide in the membrane interface, C is the peptide in water, and D is the folded peptide in the membrane. The population of peptides in solution (State C) is best described as an ensemble of folded and unfolded conformations, whereas the population of peptides in State D generally is assumed to have a single, well-defined helicity, as shown in Fig. 1 A (5). Given that, in principle, folding in solution and in the membrane interface should follow the same basic rules, peptides in state D could reasonably be assumed to also be an ensemble. A fundamental question (5) is therefore whether peptides in state D can be correctly described as having a single helicity. Because differentiating an ensemble of conformations and a single conformation may be an impossible experimental task (5), molecular-dynamics (MD) simulations provide a unique high-resolution view of the phenomenon.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Thermodynamic cycles for peptide partitioning into a membrane interface. States A and B correspond to the fully unfolded peptide in solution and membrane interface, respectively. The folded peptide in solution is best described as an ensemble of unfolded and folded conformations (State C). State D is generally assumed to be one of peptides with a narrow range of conformations, but the state could actually be an ensemble of states as in the case of State C.Melittin is a 26-residue, amphipathic peptide that partitions strongly into membrane interfaces and therefore has become a model system for describing folding energetics (3,6–8). Here, we describe the structural dynamics of melittin in a dioleoylphosphatidylcholine (DOPC) bilayer by means of two extensive MD simulations using two different force fields.We extended a 12-ns equilibrated melittin-DOPC system (9) by 17 μs using the Anton specialized hardware (10) with the CHARMM22/36 protein/lipid force field and CMAP correction (11,12) (see Fig. S1 and Fig. S2 in the Supporting Material). To explore force-field effects, a similar system was simulated for 2 μs using the OPLS force field (13) (see Methods in the Supporting Material). In agreement with x-ray diffraction measurements on melittin in DOPC multilayers (14), melittin partitioned spontaneously into the lipid headgroups at a position below the phosphate groups at similar depth as glycerol/carbonyl groups (Fig. 2).Open in a separate windowFigure 2Melittin partitioned into the polar headgroup region of the lipid bilayer. (A) Snapshot of the simulation cell showing two melittin molecules (MLT1 and MLT2, in yellow) at the lipid-water interface. (B) Density cross-section of the simulation cell extracted from the 17-μs simulation. The peptides are typically located below the lipid phosphate (PO4) groups, in a similar depth as the glycerol/carbonyl (G/C) groups.To describe the secondary structure for each residue, we defined helicity by backbone dihedral angles (φ, ψ) within 30° from the ideal α-helical values (–57°, –47°). The per-residue helicity in the CHARMM simulation displays excellent agreement with amide exchange rates from NMR measurements that show a proline residue to separate two helical segments, which are unfolded below Ala⁵ and above Arg²² (15) (Fig. 3 A). In contrast, the OPLS simulation failed to reproduce the per-residue helicity except for a short central segment (see Fig. S3).Open in a separate windowFigure 3Helicity and conformational distribution of melittin as determined via MD simulation. (A) Helicity per residue for MLT1 and MLT2. (B) Corresponding evolution of the helicity. (C) Conformational distributions over the entire 17-μs simulation.Circular dichroism experiments typically report an average helicity of ∼70% for melittin at membrane interfaces (3,6,16,17), but other methods yield average helicities as high as 85% (15,18). Our CHARMM simulations are generally consistent with the experimental results, especially amide-exchange measurements (15); melittin helicity averaged to 78% for MLT1, whereas MLT2 transitioned from 75% to 89% helicity at t ≈ 8 μs, with an overall average helicity of 82% (Fig. 3 B). However, in the OPLS simulation, melittin steadily unfolds over the first 1.3 μs, after which the peptide remains only partly folded, with an average helicity of 33% (see Fig. S3). Similar force-field-related differences in peptide helicity were recently reported, albeit at shorter timescales (19). Although suitable NMR data are not presently available, we have computed NMR quadrupolar splittings for future reference (see Fig. S4).To answer the question asked in this article—whether the conformational space of folded melittin in the membrane interface can be described by a narrow distribution—the helicity distributions for the equilibrated trajectories are shown in Fig. 3 C. Whereas MLT1 in the CHARMM simulation produces a single, narrow distribution of the helicity, MLT2 has a bimodal distribution as a consequence of the folding event at t ≈ 8 μs (Fig. 3 C). We note that CHARMM force fields have a propensity for helix-formation and this transition might therefore be an artifact. We performed a cluster analysis to describe the structure of the peptide in the membrane interface. The four most populated conformations in the CHARMM simulation are shown in Fig. 4. The dominant conformation for both peptides was a helix kinked at G12 and unfolded at the last 5–6 residues of the C-terminus. The folding transition of MLT2 into a complete helix is visible by the 48% occupancy of a fully folded helix.Open in a separate windowFigure 4Conformational clusters of the two melittin peptides (MLT1 and MLT2) from the 17-μs CHARMM simulation in DOPC. Clustering is based on Cα-RMSD with a cutoff criterion of 2 Å.We conclude that the general assumption when calculating folding energetics holds: Folded melittin partitioned into membrane interfaces can be described by a narrow distribution of conformations. Furthermore, extended (several microsecond) simulations are needed to differentiate force-field effects. Although the CHARMM and OPLS simulations would seem to agree for the first few hundred nanoseconds, the structural conclusions differ drastically with longer trajectories, with CHARMM parameters being more consistent with experiments. However, as implied by the difference in substate distributions between MLT1 and MLT2, 17 μs might not be sufficient to observe the fully equilibrated partitioning process. The abrupt change in MLT2 might indicate that the helicity will increase to greater than experimentally observed in a sufficiently long simulation. On the other hand, it could be nothing more than a transient fluctuation. Increased sampling will provide further indicators of convergence of the helix partitioning process.     

The Mechanism of Amino Acid Activation: the Work of Mahlon Hoagland

Enzymatic Carboxyl Activation of Amino Acids(Hoagland, M. B., Keller, E. B., and Zamecnik, P. C. (1956) J. Biol. Chem. 218, 345–358)Mahlon Bush Hoagland was born in Boston, Massachusetts in 1921. He attended Harvard University and graduated in 1943. Knowing that he wanted to be a surgeon, Hoagland then enrolled at Harvard Medical School. However, he was diagnosed with tuberculosis, and his poor health prevented him from becoming a surgeon when he received his M.D. in 1948. Instead, he accepted a research position at Massachusetts General Hospital. In 1953, he became a postdoctoral fellow with Journal of Biological Chemistry (JBC) Classic author Fritz Lipmann (1) at Huntington Laboratories (also at Massachusetts General Hospital), and a year later, he moved to an adjoining laboratory to work on protein synthesis with JBC Classic author Paul Zamecnik (2).Open in a separate windowMahlon HoaglandInspired by Lipmann''s insights into acyl activation mechanisms, Hoagland used a cell-free system created by Zamecnik that carried out net peptide bond formation using ¹⁴C-amino acids (3) to uncover the mechanism of amino acid activation. As reported in the JBC Classic reprinted here, he isolated an enzyme fraction that, in the presence of ATP and amino acids, catalyzed the first step in protein synthesis: the formation of aminoacyl adenylates or activated amino acids. Using data from analysis of this fraction, Hoagland presented a scheme for amino acid activation in his Classic paper.A few years later, Zamecnik and Hoagland discovered a molecule that is essential for protein synthesis: tRNA. This discovery is the subject of the Zamecnik Classic (2).After the discovery of tRNA, Hoagland spent the next year (1957–1958) at Cambridge University''s Cavendish laboratories working with Francis Crick. During that year he traveled to France to visit the Institute Pasteur in Paris. Experiments begun at the Institute would, by 1960, lead to the discovery of messenger RNA (mRNA).When he returned to the United States, Hoagland was appointed associate professor of microbiology at Harvard Medical School. He remained there until 1967 when he accepted a position as professor at Dartmouth Medical School. In 1970, he became the director of the Worcester Foundation for Experimental Biology, a Massachusetts research institute founded by his father. He retired in 1985 and currently lives in Thetford, Vermont.Hoagland has received several awards and honors in recognition of his contributions to science. These include the 1976 Franklin Medal, the 1982 and 1996 Book Awards from the American Medical Writers Association, and membership in the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the National Academy of Sciences.     

Mutational Biosynthesis of Novel Rapamycins by a Strain of Streptomyces hygroscopicus NRRL 5491 Disrupted in rapL,Encoding a Putative Lysine Cyclodeaminase

The gene rapL lies within the region of the Streptomyces hygroscopicus chromosome which contains the biosynthetic gene cluster for the immunosuppressant rapamycin. Introduction of a frameshift mutation into rapL by ΦC31 phage-mediated gene replacement gave rise to a mutant which did not produce significant amounts of rapamycin. Growth of this rapL mutant on media containing added l-pipecolate restored wild-type levels of rapamycin production, consistent with a proposal that rapL encodes a specific l-lysine cyclodeaminase important for the production of the l-pipecolate precursor. In the presence of added proline derivatives, rapL mutants synthesized novel rapamycin analogs, indicating a relaxed substrate specificity for the enzyme catalyzing pipecolate incorporation into the macrocycle.Rapamycin is a 31-member macrocyclic polyketide produced by Streptomyces hygroscopicus NRRL 5491 which, like the structurally related compounds FK506 and immunomycin (Fig. ​(Fig.1),1), has potent immunosuppressive properties (24). Such compounds are potentially valuable in the treatment of autoimmune diseases and in preventing the rejection of transplanted tissues (16). The biosynthesis of rapamycin requires a modular polyketide synthase, which uses a shikimate-derived starter unit (11, 20) and which carries out a total of fourteen successive cycles of polyketide chain elongation that resemble the steps in fatty acid biosynthesis (2, 27). l-Pipecolic acid is then incorporated (21) into the chain, followed by closure of the macrocyclic ring, and both these steps are believed to be catalyzed by a pipecolate-incorporating enzyme (PIE) (18), the product of the rapP gene (8, 15). Further site-specific oxidations and O-methylation steps (15) are then required to produce rapamycin. Open in a separate windowFIG. 1Structures of rapamycin, FK506, and immunomycin.The origin of the pipecolic acid inserted into rapamycin has been previously established (21) to be free l-pipecolic acid derived from l-lysine (although the possible role of d-lysine as a precursor must also be borne in mind) (9). Previous work with other systems has suggested several alternative pathways for pipecolate formation from lysine (22), but the results of the incorporation of labelled lysine into the pipecolate moiety of immunomycin (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) clearly indicate loss of the α-nitrogen atom (3). More recently, the sequencing of the rap gene cluster revealed the presence of the rapL gene (Fig. ​(Fig.2),2), whose deduced gene product bears striking sequence similarity to two isoenzymes of ornithine deaminase from Agrobacterium tumefaciens (25, 26). Ornithine deaminase catalyzes the deaminative cyclization of ornithine to proline, and we have proposed (15) that the rapL gene product catalyzes the analogous conversion of l-lysine to l-pipecolate (Fig. ​(Fig.3).3). Open in a separate windowFIG. 2A portion of the rapamycin biosynthetic gene cluster which contains ancillary (non-polyketide synthase) genes (15, 27). PKS, polyketide synthase.Open in a separate windowFIG. 3(A) The conversion of l-ornithine to l-proline by ornithine cyclodeaminase (17). (B) Proposed conversion of l-lysine to l-pipecolic acid by the rapL gene product.Here, we report the use of ΦC31 phage-mediated gene replacement (10) to introduce a frameshift mutation into rapL and the ability of the mutant to synthesize rapamycins in the absence or presence of added pipecolate or pipecolate analogs.     

Auxin and Monocot Development

Monocots are known to respond differently to auxinic herbicides; hence, certain herbicides kill broadleaf (i.e., dicot) weeds while leaving lawns (i.e., monocot grasses) intact. In addition, the characters that distinguish monocots from dicots involve structures whose development is controlled by auxin. However, the molecular mechanisms controlling auxin biosynthesis, homeostasis, transport, and signal transduction appear, so far, to be conserved between monocots and dicots, although there are differences in gene copy number and expression leading to diversification in function. This article provides an update on the conservation and diversification of the roles of genes controlling auxin biosynthesis, transport, and signal transduction in root, shoot, and reproductive development in rice and maize.Auxinic herbicides have been used for decades to control dicot weeds in domestic lawns (Fig. 1A), commercial golf courses, and acres of corn, wheat, and barley, yet it is not understand how auxinic herbicides selectively kill dicots and spare monocots (Grossmann 2000; Kelley and Reichers 2007). Monocots, in particular grasses, must perceive or respond differently to exogenous synthetic auxin than dicots. It has been proposed that this selectivity is because of either limited translocation or rapid degradation of exogenous auxin (Gauvrit and Gaillardon 1991; Monaco et al. 2002), altered vascular anatomy (Monaco et al. 2002), or altered perception of auxin in monocots (Kelley and Reichers 2007). To explain these differences, there is a need to further understand the molecular basis of auxin metabolism, transport, and signaling in monocots.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Differences between monocots and dicots. (A) A dicot weed in a lawn of grasses. Note the difference in morphology of the leaves. (B) Germinating dicot (bean) seedling. Dicots have two cotyledons (cot). Reticulate venation is apparent in the leaves. The stem below the cotyledons is called the hypocotyl (hyp). (C) Germinating monocot (maize) seedling. Monocots have a single cotyledon called the coleoptile (col) in grasses. Parallel venation is apparent in the leaves. The stem below the coleoptile is called the mesocotyl (mes).Auxin, as we have seen in previous articles, plays a major role in vegetative, reproductive, and root development in the model dicot, Arabidopsis. However, monocots have a very different anatomy from dicots (Raven et al. 2005). Many of the characters that distinguish monocots and dicots involve structures whose development is controlled by auxin: (1) As the name implies, monocots have single cotyledons, whereas dicots have two cotyledons (Fig. 1B,C). Auxin transport during embryogenesis may play a role in this difference as cotyledon number defects are often seen in auxin transport mutants (reviewed in Chandler 2008). (2) The vasculature in leaves of dicots is reticulate, whereas the vasculature in monocots is parallel (Fig. 1). Auxin functions in vascular development because many mutants defective in auxin transport, biosynthesis, or signaling have vasculature defects (Scarpella and Meijer 2004). (3) Dicots often produce a primary tap root that produces lateral roots, whereas, in monocots, especially grasses, shoot-borne adventitious roots are the most prominent component of the root system leading to the characteristic fibrous root system (Fig. 2). Auxin induces lateral-root formation in dicots and adventitious root formation in grasses (Hochholdinger and Zimmermann 2008).Open in a separate windowFigure 2.The root system in monocots. (A) Maize seedling showing the primary root (1yR), which has many lateral roots (LR). The seminal roots (SR) are a type of adventitious root produced during embryonic development. Crown roots (CR) are produced from stem tissue. (B) The base of a maize plant showing prop roots (PR), which are adventitious roots produced from basal nodes of the stem later in development.It is not yet clear if auxin controls the differences in morphology seen in dicots versus monocots. However, both conservation and diversification of mechanisms of auxin biosynthesis, homeostasis, transport, and signal transduction have been discovered so far. This article highlights the similarities and the differences in the role of auxin in monocots compared with dicots. First, the genes in each of the pathways are introduced (Part I, Table I) and then the function of these genes in development is discussed with examples from the monocot grasses, maize, and rice (Part II).     

Diversity in spindle morphology in Arabidopsis root tip

A primary function of the spindle apparatus is to segregate chromosomes into two equal sets in a dividing cell. It is unclear whether spindles in different cell types play additional roles in cellular regulation. As a first step in revealing new functions of spindles, we investigated spindle morphology in different cell types in Arabidopsis roots in the wild-type and the cytokinesis defective1 (cyd1) mutant backgrounds. cyd1 provides cells larger than those of the wild type for testing the cell size effect on spindle morphology. Our observations indicate that cell type (shape), not cell size, is likely a factor affecting spindle morphology. At least three spindle types were observed, including small spindles with pointed poles in narrow cells, large barrel-shaped spindles (without pointed poles) in wide cells, and spindles intermediate in pole focus and size in other cells. We hypothesize that the cell-type-associated spindle diversity may be an integral part of the cell differentiation processes.Key words: spindle pole, microtubule, morphogenesis, cell type, metaphaseThe cellular apparatus for chromosome segregation during mitosis is typically described as a spindle composed of microtubules and microtubule-associated proteins. Research on the structure and function of the spindle is usually conducted under the assumption that spindles are structurally the same or alike in different cell types in an organism. If the assumption is true, it would indicate that either the intracellular conditions in different dividing cells are very similar or the assembly and maintenance of the spindle are insensitive to otherwise variable intracellular conditions. But experimental evidence related to this assumption is relatively sparse.The root tip in Arabidopsis, as in other higher plants, contains dividing cells of different shapes and sizes. These cells include both meristem initial and derivative cells, with the former and latter being proximal and distal to the quiescent center, respectively.¹ The diversity in dividing cells in the root tip provides an opportunity for testing whether the spindles also exhibit diversity in morphology. To visualize the spindles at the metaphase stage in the root tip cells, we conducted indirect immunofluorescence labeling of the β-tubulin in single cells prepared from wild-type Arabidopsis (in Col-0 background) root tips as previously described in references ² and ³. The spindles in cells of different morphologies were then observed under a confocal laser scanning microscope.³ Three types of spindle were detected. The first type (Fig. 1A) was the smallest in width and length and had the most-pointed poles among the three types. The second type (Fig. 1B) was wider and longer than the first type but with less-pointed poles than the first type. The third type (Fig. 1C) was similar in height to the second type but lacked the pointed poles. In fact, the third type is shaped more like a barrel than a spindle. The first type was found in cells narrow in the direction parallel to the equatorial plane of the spindle, a situation opposite to that of the third type whose cells were wide in the equatorial direction. The wide cells containing the barrel-shaped spindles likely belonged to the epidermal layer in the root tip.¹ The second type was found in cells intermediate in width. Examples of metaphase spindles morphologically resembling the three types of spindles in Arabidopsis root can also be found in a previous report by Xu et al. even although spindle diversity was not the subject of the report.⁴ In Xu et al.''s report, type 1- or 2-like metaphase spindles can be identified in Figures 2B and 3A, and type 3-like metaphase spindles can be identified in Figures 1A and 3B. These observations indicate that at least three types of spindles exist in the root cells.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Spindles in wild-type root cells. (A) Type-1 spindle. (B) Type-2 spindle. (C) Type-3 spindle. The spots without fluorescence signals in the middle of the spindles are where the chromosomes were located. Scale bar for all the figures = 20 µm.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Spindles in cyd1 root cells. (A) Type-1 spindle. Arrows indicate the upper and lower boundaries of the cell. (B and C) Two type-2 spindles. (D and E) Two type-3 spindles. (F) DAPI-staining image corresponding to (E), showing chromosomes at the equatorial plane. Scale bar for the images = 20 µm.The above observations suggest that either the cell size or the cell type (shape) might be a factor in the type of spindle found in a specific cell. To further investigate the relationship between cell morphology and spindle morphology, we studied metaphase spindles in root cells of the cytokinesis defective1 (cyd1) mutant.⁵ Because the root cells in cyd1 were larger than corresponding cells in the wild type, presumably due to abnormal polyploidization prior to the collection of the root cells,^5,6 this investigation might reveal a relationship between increasing cell size and altered spindle morphology. A pattern of different spindle types in different cell types similar to that in the wild type was observed in cyd1 (Fig. 2). Figures 2A–C show narrow cells that contained spindles with pointed poles even though the spindles differed in size and focus. Figure 2D shows a barrel-shaped spindle in a wide cell, resembling Figure 1C in overall appearance. The large number of chromosomes at metaphase (more than the diploid number of 10) in Figure 2F indicates that the cells in Figure 2 were polyploid. These figures thus demonstrate that the enlargement in cell size did not alter the pattern of types 1 and 2 spindles in narrow cells, as well as type 3 spindles in wide cells. Moreover, the edges of the spindles in Figure 2B and E were similarly distanced to the cell walls in the equatorial plane, and yet they differ greatly in shape with the former being type 2 and the latter being type 3. This finding argues against that the cell width in the equatorial direction dictates the spindle shape. On the other hand, the cells in Figure 2B and E are obviously of different types. Taken together, these observations suggest that the spindle diversity in both wild type and cyd1 is associated with cell-type diversity.It is unclear whether the different spindle types have different functions in their respective cell types, in addition to the usual role for chromosome segregation. One possibility is that, at the ensuing telophase, the pointed spindles result in compact chromosomal congregation at the poles whereas the barrel-shaped spindles result in loose chromosomal congregation at the poles, which in turn may differentially affect the shape of the subsequently formed daughter nuclei and their organization. Different nuclear shape and organization are likely to be integrated into the processes that confer cell differentiation.     

Glutathione signaling acts through NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway to mitigate biotic stress

Glutathione (GSH) has widely been known to be a multifunctional molecule especially as an antioxidant up until now, but has found a new role in plant defense signaling. Research from the past three decades indicate that GSH is a player in pathogen defense in plants, but the mechanism underlying this has not been elucidated fully. We have recently shown that GSH acts as a signaling molecule and mitigates biotic stress through non-expressor of PR genes 1 (NPR1)-dependent salicylic acid (SA)-mediated pathway. Transgenic tobacco with enhanced level of GSH (NtGB lines) was found to synthesize more SA, was capable of enhanced expression of genes belonging to NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway, were resistant to Pseudomonas syringae, the biotrophic pathogen and many SA-related proteins were upregulated. These results gathered experimental evidence on the mechanism through which GSH combats biotic stress. In continuation with our previous investigation we show here that the expression of glutathione S-transferase (GST), the NPR1-independent SA-mediated gene was unchanged in transgenic tobacco with enhanced level of GSH as compared to wild-type plants. Additionally, the transgenic plants were barely resistant to Botrytis cinerea, the necrotrophic pathogen. SA-treatment led to enhanced level of expression of pathogenesis-related protein gene (PR1) and PR4 as against short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family protein (SDRLP) and allene oxide synthase (AOS). These data provided significant insight into the involvement of GSH in NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway in mitigating biotic stress.Key words: GSH, signaling molecule, biotrophic pathogen, NPR-1, PR-1, PR-4, transgenic tobaccoPlant responses to different environmental stresses are achieved through integrating shared signaling networks and mediated by the synergistic or antagonistic interactions with the phytohormones viz. SA, jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene (ET), abscisic acid (ABA) and reactive oxygen species (ROS).¹ Previous studies have shown that in response to pathogen attack, plants produce a highly specific blend of SA, JA and ET, resulting in the activation of distinct sets of defense-related genes.^2,3 Regulatory functions for ROS in defense, with a focus on the response to pathogen infection occur in conjunction with other plant signaling molecules, particularly with SA and nitric oxide (NO).^4–6 Till date, numerous physiological functions have been attributed to GSH in plants.^7–11 In addition to previous studies, recent study has also shown that GSH acts as a signaling molecule in combating biotic stress through NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway.^12,13Our recent investigation involved raising of transgenic tobacco overexpressing gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase (γ-ECS), the rate-limiting enzyme of the GSH biosynthetic pathway.¹² The stable integration and enhanced expression of the transgene at the mRNA as well as protein level was confirmed by Southern blot, quantitative RT-PCR and western blot analysis respectively. The transgenic plants of the T₂ generation (Fig. 1), the phenotype of which was similar to that of wild-type plants were found to be capable of synthesizing enhanced amount of GSH as confirmed by HPLC analysis.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Transgenic tobacco of T₂ generation, (A) three-week-old plant, (B) mature plant.In the present study, the expression profile of GST was analyzed in NtGB lines by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) and found that the expression level of this gene is unchanged in NtGB lines as compared to wild-type plants (Fig. 2). GST is known to be a NPR1-independent SA-related gene.¹⁴ This suggests that GSH does not follow the NPR1-independent SA-mediated pathway in defense signaling.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Expression pattern of GST in wild-type and NtGB lines.Disease test assay with NtGB lines and wild-type plants was performed using B. cinerea and the NtGB lines showed negligible rate of resistance to this necrotrophic pathogen (Fig. 3). SA signaling has been known to control defense against biotrophic pathogen in contrast, JA/ET signaling controls defense against necrotrophic pathogen.^1,15 Thus it has again been proved that GSH is not an active member in the crosstalk of JA-mediated pathway, rather it follows the SA-mediated pathway as has been evidenced earlier.¹²Open in a separate windowFigure 3Resistance pattern of wild-type and NtGB lines against Botrytis cinerea.Additionally, the leaves of wild-type and NtGB lines were treated with 1 mM SA and the expression of PR1, SDRLP, AOS and PR4 genes were analyzed and compared to untreated plants to simulate pathogen infection. The expression of PR1 increased after exogenous application of SA. In case of PR4, the ET marker, the expression level increased in NtGB lines. On the other hand, the level of SDRLP was nearly the same. However, the expression of AOS was absent in SA-treated leaves (Fig. 4). PR1 has been known to be induced by SA-treatment¹⁶ which can be corroborated with our results. In addition, ET is known to enhance SA/NPR1-dependent defense responses,¹⁷ which was reflected in our study as well. AOS, the biosynthetic pathway gene of JA, further known to be the antagonist of SA, was downregulated in SA-treated plants.Open in a separate windowFigure 4Gene expression pattern of PR1, SDRLP, PR4 and AOS in untreated and SA-treated wildtype and NtGB lines.Taken together, it can be summarized that this study provided new evidence on the involvement of GSH with SA in NPR1-dependent manner in combating biotic stress. Additionally, it can be claimed that GSH is a signaling molecule which takes an active part in the cross-communication with other established signaling molecules like SA, JA, ET in induced defense responses and has an immense standpoint in plant defense signaling.     

Cyanobacterial Heterocysts

Many multicellular cyanobacteria produce specialized nitrogen-fixing heterocysts. During diazotrophic growth of the model organism Anabaena (Nostoc) sp. strain PCC 7120, a regulated developmental pattern of single heterocysts separated by about 10 to 20 photosynthetic vegetative cells is maintained along filaments. Heterocyst structure and metabolic activity function together to accommodate the oxygen-sensitive process of nitrogen fixation. This article focuses on recent research on heterocyst development, including morphogenesis, transport of molecules between cells in a filament, differential gene expression, and pattern formation.Organisms composed of multiple differentiated cell types can possess structures, functions, and behaviors that are more diverse and efficient than those of unicellular organisms. Among multicellular prokaryotes, heterocyst-forming cyanobacteria offer an excellent model for the study of cellular differentiation and multicellular pattern formation. Cyanobacteria are a large group of Gram-negative prokaryotes that perform oxygenic photosynthesis. They have evolved multiple specialized cell types, including nitrogen-fixing heterocysts, spore-like akinetes, and the cells of motile hormogonia filaments. Of these, the development of heterocysts in the filamentous cyanobacterium Anabaena (also Nostoc) sp. strain PCC 7120 (hereafter Anabaena PCC 7120) has been the best studied. Heterocyst development offers a striking example of cellular differentiation and developmental biology in a very simple form: Filaments are composed of only two cell types and these are arrayed in a one-dimensional pattern similar to beads on a string (Figs. 1 and ​and22).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Heterocyst development in Anabaena PCC 7120. (A) Anabaena PCC 7120 grown in medium containing a source of combined nitrogen grows as filaments of photosynthetic vegetative cells. (B) In the absence of combined nitrogen, heterocysts differentiate at semiregular intervals, forming a developmental pattern of single heterocysts every 10 to 20 vegetative cells along filaments. Heterocysts are often larger than vegetative cells, have a thicker multilayered envelope, and usually contain cyanophycin granules at their poles adjacent to a vegetative cell.Open in a separate windowFigure 2.Heterocyst development in Anabaena PCC 7120. Filaments of the wild type carrying a patS-gfp reporter grown in medium containing nitrate are composed of vegetative cells (A), and have undergone heterocyst development 1 d after transfer to medium without combined nitrogen (B). A patS mutant strain carrying the same patS-gfp reporter grown in media containing nitrate contains a small number of heterocysts (C), and 1 d after transfer to medium without combined nitrogen shows a higher than normal frequency of heterocysts and an abnormal developmental pattern (D). (A, B, C, D) Merged DIC (grayscale), autofluorescence of photosynthetic pigments (red), and patS-gfp reporter fluorescence (green) microscopic images; arrowheads indicate heterocysts; asterisks indicate proheterocysts; size bar, 5 µm. (E, F) Transmission electron micrographs of wild-type vegetative cells (V) and a heterocyst (H) at the end of a filament; T, thylakoid membranes; PS, polysaccharide layer; GL, glycolipid layer; C, polar cyanophycin granule; size bar, 0.2 µm.Many cyanobacterial species are capable of nitrogen fixation. However, oxygenic photosynthesis and nitrogen fixation are incompatible processes because nitrogenase is inactivated by oxygen. Cyanobacteria mainly use two mechanisms to separate these activities: a biological circadian clock to separate them temporally, and multicellularity and cellular differentiation to separate them spatially. For example, the unicellular Cyanothece sp. strain ATCC 51142 stores glycogen during the day and fixes nitrogen at night (Toepel et al. 2008), whereas the filamentous Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS101 fixes nitrogen during the day in groups of specialized cells (Sandh et al. 2009). Heterocyst-forming cyanobacteria differentiate highly specialized cells to provide fixed nitrogen to the vegetative cells in a filament.In the presence of a source of combined nitrogen such as nitrate or ammonium, Anabaena PCC 7120 grows as long filaments containing hundreds of photosynthetic vegetative cells. In the absence of combined nitrogen, it produces heterocysts, which are terminally differentiated nitrogen-fixing cells that form at semiregular intervals between stretches of vegetative cells to produce a multicellular pattern of single heterocysts every ten to twenty vegetative cells along filaments (Figs. 1 and ​and2).2). Some heterocyst-forming cyanobacteria show different regulation or display different developmental patterns but these topics are beyond the scope of this article. Heterocyst development involves integration of multiple external and internal signals, communication between the cells in a filament, and temporal and spatial regulation of genes and cellular processes. The study of heterocyst development in Anabaena PCC 7120 has proven to be an excellent model for the study of cell fate determination, pattern formation, and differential gene expression during prokaryotic multicellular evelopment. Various aspects of heterocyst development, signaling, and regulation have been the subject of several recent reviews (Meeks and Elhai 2002; Forchhammer 2004; Herrero et al. 2004; Zhang et al. 2006; Aldea et al. 2008; Zhao and Wolk 2008).Although beyond the scope of this article, it should be noted that cyanobacteria have recently attracted increased attention because of their important roles in environmental carbon and nitrogen fixation (Montoya et al. 2004), and their potential for providing renewable chemicals and biofuels (Dismukes et al. 2008).     

Entry and Exit Mechanisms at the cis-Face of the Golgi Complex

Vesicular transport of protein and lipid cargo from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to cis-Golgi compartments depends on coat protein complexes, Rab GTPases, tethering factors, and membrane fusion catalysts. ER-derived vesicles deliver cargo to an ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC) that then fuses with and/or matures into cis-Golgi compartments. The forward transport pathway to cis-Golgi compartments is balanced by a retrograde directed pathway that recycles transport machinery back to the ER. How trafficking through the ERGIC and cis-Golgi is coordinated to maintain organelle structure and function is poorly understood and highlights central questions regarding trafficking routes and organization of the early secretory pathway.Newly synthesized secretory proteins and lipids are transported to early Golgi compartments in dissociative carrier vesicles that are formed from the ER (Palade 1975). Through the development of biochemical, genetic and morphological approaches, outlines for the molecular machinery that catalyze this transport step and the membrane structures that comprise the early secretory compartments have been developed (Rothman 1994; Schekman and Orci 1996). Initial images and studies suggested the early secretory pathway consisted of stable compartments with ER-derived carrier vesicles shuttling cargo to pre-Golgi and Golgi compartments. However, live cell and time-lapse imaging revealed highly dynamic structures with both secretory cargo and compartment residents detected in pleiomorphic intermediates (Presley et al. 1997; Scales et al. 1997; Shima et al. 1999; Ben-Tekaya et al. 2005). Several lines of evidence now indicate that active bidirectional transport cycles between the ER, ERGIC, and cis-Golgi compartments are balanced to maintain compartment structure and function (Lee et al. 2004). The coat protein complex II (COPII) produces vesicles for forward transport from the ER whereas the coat protein complex I (COPI) buds vesicles for retrograde transport from cis-Golgi compartments to the ER (Fig. 1). Indeed inhibition of either the forward or retrograde pathways results in a rapid loss of normal ER and Golgi organization (Lippincott-Schwartz et al. 1989; Rambourg et al. 1994; Morin-Ganet et al. 2000; Ward et al. 2001). Yet, under steady-state conditions, the cis-Golgi compartments retain a characteristic composition and structure as secretory cargo passes through. These observations indicate that the structure and function of early secretory compartments are maintained at dynamic equilibrium through coordination of multiple pathways.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Trafficking in the early secretory pathway. A simplified model depicting bidirectional transport routes between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC), and cis-Golgi cisternae. COPII vesicles bud from the ER and transport cargo in an anterograde direction for tethering and fusion with the ERGIC. The ERGIC then matures into the cis-Golgi compartment and/or fuses with the cis-Golgi. COPI vesicles bud from the ERGIC and cis-Golgi compartments in a retrograde transport pathway back to the ER to recycle transport machinery.Although much of the molecular machinery required for transport to and from cis-Golgi membranes has been identified, the current challenges are to understand the sequence of molecular events that underlie the observed structural organization. Moreover, the mechanisms that govern entry and exit rates to-from cis-Golgi membranes to maintain organization at dynamic equilibrium are poorly understood. In this perspective the known key machinery required for anterograde transport to, and retrograde exit from, cis-Golgi compartments will be described, and then current models for how compartmental structure is maintained while protein and lipid cargo fluxes through will be examined. This review will survey core machinery and principles from several experimental models although it is becoming clear that different species and different cell types within a species may employ variations on a basic theme depending on cellular function. For example, in many animal cells secretory cargo passes through a well-characterized ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC) en route to cis-Golgi cisternae. The ERGIC may be necessary to span the distance between ER export sites and the Golgi stack; however, the relationship of this intermediate compartment to the cis-Golgi remains unclear (Appenzeller-Herzog and Hauri 2006). In other species including yeast, Golgi organization appears less coherent and may be considered more simply as a series of intermediate compartments. Here COPII vesicles are thought to fuse directly with the cis-Golgi or this first intermediate compartment (Fig. 2) (Mogelsvang et al. 2003). Despite these quite varied structural organizations, there is a remarkable level of conservation in molecular machinery. After consideration of this conserved molecular machinery, we will return to organizational issues in transport to and from the cis-Golgi compartment.Open in a separate windowFigure 2.ER/Golgi organization in the yeast P. pastoris. Three-dimensional models reconstructed from electron microscope tomography showing proximity of ER and cis-most cisterna of the Golgi complex. Putative COPII vesicles are detected in a narrow region between the ER and cis-Golgi. For further information, see Mogelsvang et al. (2003). Bar = 100 nm. (Reprinted, with permission, from Mogelsvang et al. 2003 [American Society for Cell Biology].)     

The Structure and Function of the Eukaryotic Ribosome

Structures of the bacterial ribosome have provided a framework for understanding universal mechanisms of protein synthesis. However, the eukaryotic ribosome is much larger than it is in bacteria, and its activity is fundamentally different in many key ways. Recent cryo-electron microscopy reconstructions and X-ray crystal structures of eukaryotic ribosomes and ribosomal subunits now provide an unprecedented opportunity to explore mechanisms of eukaryotic translation and its regulation in atomic detail. This review describes the X-ray crystal structures of the Tetrahymena thermophila 40S and 60S subunits and the Saccharomyces cerevisiae 80S ribosome, as well as cryo-electron microscopy reconstructions of translating yeast and plant 80S ribosomes. Mechanistic questions about translation in eukaryotes that will require additional structural insights to be resolved are also presented.All ribosomes are composed of two subunits, both of which are built from RNA and protein (Figs. ​(Figs.11 and ​and2).2). Bacterial ribosomes, for example of Escherichia coli, contain a small subunit (SSU) composed of one 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and 21 ribosomal proteins (r-proteins) (Figs. ​(Figs.1A1A and ​and1B)1B) and a large subunit (LSU) containing 5S and 23S rRNAs and 33 r-proteins (Fig. 2A). Crystal structures of prokaryotic ribosomal particles, namely, the Thermus thermophilus SSU (Schluenzen et al. 2000; Wimberly et al. 2000), Haloarcula marismortui and Deinococcus radiodurans LSU (Ban et al. 2000; Harms et al. 2001), and E. coli and T. thermophilus 70S ribosomes (Yusupov et al. 2001; Schuwirth et al. 2005; Selmer et al. 2006), reveal the complex architecture that derives from the network of interactions connecting the individual r-proteins with each other and with the rRNAs (Brodersen et al. 2002; Klein et al. 2004). The 16S rRNA can be divided into four domains, which together with the r-proteins constitute the structural landmarks of the SSU (Wimberly et al. 2000) (Fig. 1A): The 5′ and 3′ minor (h44) domains with proteins S4, S5, S12, S16, S17, and S20 constitute the body (and spur or foot) of the SSU; the 3′ major domain forms the head, which is protein rich, containing S2, S3, S7, S9, S10, S13, S14, and S19; whereas the central domain makes up the platform by interacting with proteins S1, S6, S8, S11, S15, and S18 (Fig. 1B). The rRNA of the LSU can be divided into seven domains (including the 5S rRNA as domain VII), which—in contrast to the SSU—are intricately interwoven with the r-proteins as well as each other (Ban et al. 2000; Brodersen et al. 2002) (Fig. 2A). Structural landmarks on the LSU include the central protuberance (CP) and the flexible L1 and L7/L12 stalks (Fig. 2A).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.The bacterial and eukaryotic small ribosomal subunit. (A,B) Interface (upper) and solvent (lower) views of the bacterial 30S subunit (Jenner et al. 2010a). (A) 16S rRNA domains and associated r-proteins colored distinctly: b, body (blue); h, head (red); pt, platform (green); and h44, helix 44 (yellow). (B) 16S rRNA colored gray and r-proteins colored distinctly and labeled. (C–E) Interface and solvent views of the eukaryotic 40S subunit (Rabl et al. 2011), with (C) eukaryotic-specific r-proteins (red) and rRNA (pink) shown relative to conserved rRNA (gray) and r-proteins (blue), and with (D,E) 18S rRNA colored gray and r-proteins colored distinctly and labeled.Open in a separate windowFigure 2.The bacterial and eukaryotic large ribosomal subunit. (A) Interface (upper) and solvent (lower) views of the bacterial 50S subunit (Jenner et al. 2010b), with 23S rRNA domains and bacterial-specific (light blue) and conserved (blue) r-proteins colored distinctly: cp, central protuberance; L1, L1 stalk; and St, L7/L12 stalk (or P-stalk in archeaa/eukaryotes). (B–E) Interface and solvent views of the eukaryotic 60S subunit (Klinge et al. 2011), with (B) eukaryotic-specific r-proteins (red) and rRNA (pink) shown relative to conserved rRNA (gray) and r-proteins (blue), (C) eukaryotic-specific expansion segments (ES) colored distinctly, and (D,E) 28S rRNA colored gray and r-proteins colored distinctly and labeled.In contrast to their bacterial counterparts, eukaryotic ribosomes are much larger and more complex, containing additional rRNA in the form of so-called expansion segments (ES) as well as many additional r-proteins and r-protein extensions (Figs. 1C–E and ​and2C–E).2C–E). Compared with the ∼4500 nucleotides of rRNA and 54 r-proteins of the bacterial 70S ribosome, eukaryotic 80S ribosomes contain >5500 nucleotides of rRNA (SSU, 18S rRNA; LSU, 5S, 5.8S, and 25S rRNA) and 80 (79 in yeast) r-proteins. The first structural models for the eukaryotic (yeast) ribosome were built using 15-Å cryo–electon microscopy (cryo-EM) maps fitted with structures of the bacterial SSU (Wimberly et al. 2000) and archaeal LSU (Ban et al. 2000), thus identifying the location of a total of 46 eukaryotic r-proteins with bacterial and/or archaeal homologs as well as many ES (Spahn et al. 2001a). Subsequent cryo-EM reconstructions led to the localization of additional eukaryotic r-proteins, RACK1 (Sengupta et al. 2004) and S19e (Taylor et al. 2009) on the SSU and L30e (Halic et al. 2005) on the LSU, as well as more complete models of the rRNA derived from cryo-EM maps of canine and fungal 80S ribosomes at ∼9 Å (Chandramouli et al. 2008; Taylor et al. 2009). Recent cryo-EM reconstructions of plant and yeast 80S translating ribosomes at 5.5–6.1 Å enabled the correct placement of an additional six and 10 r-proteins on the SSU and LSU, respectively, as well as the tracing of many eukaryotic-specific r-protein extensions (Armache et al. 2010a,b). The full assignment of the r-proteins in the yeast and fungal 80S ribosomes, however, only became possible with the improved resolution (3.0–3.9 Å) resulting from the crystal structures of the SSU and LSU from Tetrahymena thermophila (Klinge et al. 2011; Rabl et al. 2011) and the Saccharomyces cerevisiae 80S ribosome (Figs. ​(Figs.1D,E1D,E and ​and2D,E)2D,E) (Ben-Shem et al. 2011).     

Focus Issue on Plant Cell Walls: Sequencing around 5-Hydroxyconiferyl Alcohol-Derived Units in Caffeic Acid O-Methyltransferase-Deficient Poplar Lignins

Caffeic acid O-methyltransferase (COMT) is a bifunctional enzyme that methylates the 5- and 3-hydroxyl positions on the aromatic ring of monolignol precursors, with a preference for 5-hydroxyconiferaldehyde, on the way to producing sinapyl alcohol. Lignins in COMT-deficient plants contain benzodioxane substructures due to the incorporation of 5-hydroxyconiferyl alcohol (5-OH-CA), as a monomer, into the lignin polymer. The derivatization followed by reductive cleavage method can be used to detect and determine benzodioxane structures because of their total survival under this degradation method. Moreover, partial sequencing information for 5-OH-CA incorporation into lignin can be derived from detection or isolation and structural analysis of the resulting benzodioxane products. Results from a modified derivatization followed by reductive cleavage analysis of COMT-deficient lignins provide evidence that 5-OH-CA cross couples (at its β-position) with syringyl and guaiacyl units (at their O-4-positions) in the growing lignin polymer and then either coniferyl or sinapyl alcohol, or another 5-hydroxyconiferyl monomer, adds to the resulting 5-hydroxyguaiacyl terminus, producing the benzodioxane. This new terminus may also become etherified by coupling with further monolignols, incorporating the 5-OH-CA integrally into the lignin structure.Lignins are polymeric aromatic constituents of plant cell walls, constituting about 15% to 35% of the dry mass (Freudenberg and Neish, 1968; Adler, 1977). Unlike other natural polymers such as cellulose or proteins, which have labile linkages (glycosides and peptides) between their building units, lignins’ building units are combinatorially linked with strong ether and carbon-carbon bonds (Sarkanen and Ludwig, 1971; Harkin, 1973). It is difficult to completely degrade lignins. Lignins are traditionally considered to be dehydrogenative polymers derived from three monolignols, p-coumaryl alcohol 1h (which is typically minor), coniferyl alcohol 1g, and sinapyl alcohol 1s (Fig. 1; Sarkanen, 1971). They can vary greatly in their composition in terms of their plant and tissue origins (Campbell and Sederoff, 1996). This variability is probably determined and regulated by different activities and substrate specificities of the monolignol biosynthetic enzymes from different sources, and by the carefully controlled supply of monomers to the lignifying zone (Sederoff and Chang, 1991).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.The monolignols 1, and marker compounds 2 to 4 resulting from incorporation of novel monomer 15h into lignins: thioacidolysis monomeric marker 2, dimers 3, and DFRC dimeric markers 4.Recently there has been considerable interest in genetic modification of lignins with the goal of improving the utilization of lignocellulosics in various agricultural and industrial processes (Baucher et al., 2003; Boerjan et al., 2003a, 2003b). Studies on mutant and transgenic plants with altered monolignol biosynthesis have suggested that plants have a high level of metabolic plasticity in the formation of their lignins (Sederoff et al., 1999; Ralph et al., 2004). Lignins in angiosperm plants with depressed caffeic acid O-methyltransferase (COMT) were found to derive from significant amounts of 5-hydroxyconiferyl alcohol (5-OH-CA) monomers 15h (Fig. 1) substituting for the traditional monomer, sinapyl alcohol 1s (Marita et al., 2001; Ralph et al., 2001a, 2001b; Jouanin et al., 2004; Morreel et al., 2004b). NMR analysis of a ligqnin from COMT-deficient poplar (Populus spp.) has revealed that novel benzodioxane structures are formed through β-O-4 coupling of a monolignol with 5-hydroxyguaiacyl units (resulting from coupling of 5-OH-CA), followed by internal trapping of the resultant quinone methide by the phenolic 5-hydroxyl (Ralph et al., 2001a). When the lignin was subjected to thioacidolysis, a novel 5-hydroxyguaiacyl monomer 2 (Fig. 1) was found in addition to the normal guaiacyl and syringyl thioacidolysis monomers (Jouanin et al., 2000). Also, a new compound 3g (Fig. 1) was found in the dimeric products from thioacidolysis followed by Raney nickel desulfurization (Lapierre et al., 2001; Goujon et al., 2003).Further study with the lignin using the derivatization followed by reductive cleavage (DFRC) method also confirmed the existence of benzodioxane structures, with compounds 4 (Fig. 1) being identified following synthesis of the authentic parent compounds 9 (Fig. 2). However, no 5-hydroxyguaiacyl monomer could be detected in the DFRC products. These facts imply that the DFRC method leaves the benzodioxane structures fully intact, suggesting that the method might therefore be useful as an analytical tool for determining benzodioxane structures that are linked by β-O-4 ethers. Using a modified DFRC procedure, we report here on results that provide further evidence for the existence of benzodioxane structures in lignins from COMT-deficient plants, that 5-OH-CA is behaving as a rather ideal monolignol that can be integrated into plant lignins, and demonstrate the usefulness of the DFRC method for determining these benzodioxane structures.Open in a separate windowFigure 2.Synthesis of benzodioxane DFRC products 12 (see later in Fig. 6 for their structures). i, NaH, THF. ii, Pyrrolidine. iii, 1g or 1s, benzene/acetone (4/1, v/v). iv, DIBAL-H, toluene. v, Iodomethane-K₂CO₃, acetone. vi, Ac₂O pyridine.     

Protein Targeting and Transport as a Necessary Consequence of Increased Cellular Complexity

With increasing intracellular complexity, a new cell-biological problem that is the allocation of cytoplasmically synthesized proteins to their final destinations within the cell emerged. A special challenge is thereby the translocation of proteins into or across cellular membranes. The underlying mechanisms are only in parts well understood, but it can be assumed that the course of cellular evolution had a deep impact on the design of the required molecular machines. In this article, we aim to summarize the current knowledge and concepts of the evolutionary development of protein trafficking as a necessary premise and consequence of increased cellular complexity.

The evolution of modern cells is arguably the most challenging and important problem the field of biology has ever faced …—Carl R. Woese(Woese 2002)

Current models may accept that all modern eukaryotic cells arose from a single common ancestor (the cenancestral eukaryote), the nature of which is—owing to the lack of direct living or fossil descendants—still highly under debate (de Duve 2007). The chimeric nature of eukaryotic genomes with eubacterial and archaebacterial shares led to a discussion about the origin of this first “proto-eukaryote.” Several models exist (see Fig. 1), which either place the evolution of the nucleus before or after the emergence of the mitochondrion (outlined in Koonin 2010; Martijn and Ettema 2013). According to the different postulated scenarios (summarized in Embley and Martin 2006), eukaryotes in the latter case might have evolved by endosymbiosis between a hydrogen-producing, oxygen-producing, or sulfur-dependent α-proteobacterium and an archaebacterial host (Fig. 1C). The resulting mitochondriate prokaryote would have evolved the nucleus subsequently. In other scenarios (Fig. 1B), the cenancestral eukaryote emerged by cellular fusion or endosymbiosis of a Gram-negative, maybe hydrogen-producing, eubacterium and a methanogenic archaebacterium or eocyte, leading to a primitive but nucleated amitochondrial (archezoan) cell (Embley and Martin 2006, and references therein). As a third alternative, Cavalier-Smith (2002) suggested a common eubacterial ancestor for eukaryotes and archaebacteria (the Neomuran hypothesis) (Fig. 1A).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Evolution of the last common ancestor of all eukaryotic cells. A schematic depiction of the early eukaryogenesis. Because of the lack of living and fossil descendants, several opposing models are discussed (A–C). The anticipated order of events is shown as a flow chart. For details, see text. (Derived from Embley and Martin 2006; Koonin 2010.)     

Cloning and Characterization of a Gene Cluster for Hatomarubigin Biosynthesis in Streptomyces sp. Strain 2238-SVT4

Streptomyces sp. strain 2238-SVT4 produces hatomarubigins A, B, C, and D, which belong to the angucycline family. Among them, hatomarubigin D has a unique dimeric structure with a methylene linkage. PCR using aromatase and cyclase gene-specific primers identified the hrb gene cluster for angucycline biosynthesis in Streptomyces sp. 2238-SVT4. The cluster consisted of 30 open reading frames, including those for the minimal polyketide synthase, ketoreductase, aromatase, cyclase, O-methyltransferase, oxidoreductase, and oxygenase genes. Expression of a part of the gene cluster containing hrbR1 to hrbX in Streptomyces lividans TK23 resulted in the production of hatomarubigins A, B, and C. Hatomarubigin D was obtained from the conversion of hatomarubigin C by a purified enzyme encoded by hrbY, among the remaining genes.The angucycline antibiotics are a large group of naturally occurring aromatic polyketides of microbial origin (11, 15). They exhibit a wide range of biological activities, which include antibacterial, antiviral, antitumor, enzyme inhibitory, and platelet aggregation inhibitory effects. Although all the members contain a benz[a]anthraquinone skeleton of decaketide origin, their structural diversity is very broad and they have a wide variety of oxidation states. Hatomarubigins A, B, C, and D (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) belong to the angucycline family and reverse colchicine resistance in multidrug-resistant tumor cells (8). Among them, hatomarubigin D is a unique hatomarubigin C dimer with a methylene linkage. Such a dimer has not been reported previously, and little is known about the mechanism of the methylene bridge formation between two aromatic rings. In this study, a gene cluster for hatomarubigin biosynthesis was identified in Streptomyces sp. strain 2238-SVT4, and a part of the gene cluster was expressed in Streptomyces lividans to produce the hatomarubigins.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Structures of angucycline antibiotics.     

Golgi Glycosylation

Glycosylation is a very common modification of protein and lipid, and most glycosylation reactions occur in the Golgi. Although the transfer of initial sugar(s) to glycoproteins or glycolipids occurs in the ER or on the ER membrane, the subsequent addition of the many different sugars that make up a mature glycan is accomplished in the Golgi. Golgi membranes are studded with glycosyltransferases, glycosidases, and nucleotide sugar transporters arrayed in a generally ordered manner from the cis-Golgi to the trans-Golgi network (TGN), such that each activity is able to act on specific substrate(s) generated earlier in the pathway. The spectrum of glycosyltransferases and other activities that effect glycosylation may vary with cell type, and thus the final complement of glycans on glycoconjugates is variable. In addition, glycan synthesis is affected by Golgi pH, the integrity of Golgi peripheral membrane proteins, growth factor signaling, Golgi membrane dynamics, and cellular stress. Knowledge of Golgi glycosylation has fostered the development of assays to identify mechanisms of intracellular vesicular trafficking and facilitated glycosylation engineering of recombinant glycoproteins.The Golgi is home to a multitude of glycosyltransferases (GTs), glycosidases, and nucleotide sugar transporters that function together to complete the synthesis of glycans from founding sugars covalently attached to protein or lipid in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (Fig. 1, sugars shaded in green). Thus, glycoproteins, glycosphingolipids (GSLs), proteoglycans, and glycophosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchors acquire their final sugar complement during passage through the Golgi. Most glycoproteins and proteoglycans are either secreted from the cell, or span the plasma membrane with their glycans becoming the molecular frontier of the cell (Fig. 1). GSLs and GPI-anchored proteins also reside in the plasma membrane, the latter being confined to the outer leaflet of the lipid bilayer. The forest of glycans at the cell surface is often called the glycocalyx and can be visualized by electron microscopy after staining for sugars.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Glycans that mature in the Golgi. The diagram depicts simple N- and O-glycans attached to glycoproteins, proteoglycans, glycosphingolipids, and a GPI anchor in the plasma membrane. Rather rare O-glycans are found attached to EGF-like repeats (EGF; pink) or thrombospondin repeats (TSR; gray) with a particular consensus sequence. The WxxW motif in a TSR is C-mannosylated. Core regions boxed in teal are sugars added in the ER. The remaining sugars in each class of glycan are added during passage through the cis-, medial-, and trans-Golgi network (TGN) compartments of the Golgi. Abbreviations are: Man, mannose; Gal, galactose; Glc, glucose; GlcNAc, N-acetylglucosamine; GlcNH₂, Glucosamine; GlcA, glucuronic acid; IdoA, iduronic acid; GalNAc, N-acetylgalactosamine; Xyl, xylose; Fuc, Fucose; Sia, sialic acid; 3S, 3-O-sulfated; 6S, 6-O-sulfated, PO₄⁻, phosphate. (Modified from Figure 1.6 in Essentials of glycobiology, with permission from Varki and Sharon 2009.)Glycosylation is the most common posttranslational modification of proteins. Mature glycans at any one glycosylation site may be as simple as a single sugar, or as complex as a polymer of more than 200 sugars, potentially modified with phosphate, sulfate, acetate, or phosphorylcholine. Most importantly, glycans are often branched. For example, a complex N-glycan (Fig. 1) may have up to six branches or antennae, and each antenna may contain many repeating disaccharide units. This article will describe the nature of resident Golgi GTs and other activities involved in Golgi glycosylation from entry into the cis-Golgi through passage to the trans-Golgi network (TGN). The focus is on mammalian Golgi glycosylation but comparisons with yeast, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Drosophila are made where appropriate.     

Testicular Sclerosing Sertoli Cell Tumor: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Sertoli cell tumors are very rare testicular tumors, representing 0.4% to 1.5% of all testicular malignancies. They are subclassified as classic, large-cell calcifying, and sclerosing Sertoli cell tumors (SSCT) based on distinct clinical features. Only 42 cases of SSCTs have been reported in the literature. We present a case of a 23-year-old man diagnosed with SSCT.Key words: Testicular neoplasm, Sertoli cell tumor, Sclerosing Sertoli cell tumorA 23-year-old man was referred to the Cleveland Clinic Department of Urology (Cleveland, OH) for an incidentally detected right testicular mass. The mass was identified during a work-up for transient left testicular discomfort. His only notable medical history was nephrolithiasis. There was no personal or family history of testicular cancer or cryptorchidism. On physical examination, he was a well-nourished, well-masculinized young man without gynecomastia. Testicular examination revealed normal volume and consistency bilaterally without other relevant findings. Testicular ultrasonography demonstrated an 8 mm × 6 mm × 6 mm hypoechoic, solid mass in the posterior right testicle with peripheral flow on color Doppler (Figure 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Testicular ultrasound demonstrating an 8 mm × 6 mm × 6 mm hypoechoic, solid mass in the posterior right testicle (blue arrows).The remainder of the ultrasound examination yielded normal results. Lactic dehydrogenase, B-human chorionic gonadotropin, and α-fetoprotein levels were all within the normal range. After a thorough review of the options, the patient was then taken to the operating room for inguinal exploration. Intraoperative ultrasound confirmed a superficial 8-mm hypoechoic testis lesion. A whiteyellow, well-demarcated nodule was widely excised and a frozen section was sent to pathology for examination. The frozen section examination revealed the lesion to be a neoplasm with differential diagnosis including sclerosing Sertoli cell tumor (SSCT), adenomatoid tumor, and a variant of Leydig cell tumor. Because the final diagnosis could not be determined from frozen section, the decision was made to perform a right radical orchiectomy. Pathologic examination revealed a grossly unifocal, well-circumscribed, white, firm mass of 0.8 cm. Microscopically the lesion was composed of solid and hollow tubules and occasional anastomosing cords distributed within the hypocellular, densely collagenous stroma. Although the lesion was somewhat well circumscribed, entrapped seminiferous tubules with Sertoli-only cells were present within the tumor (Figure 2). Tumor cells had pale or eosinophilic cytoplasm with small and dark nuclei with inconspicuous nucleoli. The tumor was confined to the testis and margins were negative. A diagnosis of SSCT was reached, supported by positive immunostain results for steroidogenic factor 1, focal inhibin, and calretinin expression, and negative stain results for cytokeratin AE1/AE3 and epithelial membrane antigen in the tumor (Figure 3). The postoperative course was unremarkable. Computed tomography scan of the abdomen and pelvis and chest radiograph were negative for metastatic disease.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Low-power examination revealing a well-circumscribed tumor composed of solid and hollow tubules and occasional anastomosing cords distributed within the hypocellular, densely collagenous stroma. Hematoxylin and eosin stain, original magnification ×40. (B) High-power examination. Note entrapped seminiferous tubules lacking spermatogenesis. Hematoxylin and eosin stain, original magnification ×100.Open in a separate windowFigure 3Nuclear expression of steroidogenic factor 1 in the tumor as well as benign Sertoli cells in entrapped seminiferous tubules (original magnification ×200). (B) Focal calretinin expression in the tumor (inhibin had a similar staining pattern; original magnification ×100).