A quantitative kinetic scheme for 70 S translation initiation complex formation

Association of the 30 S initiation complex (30SIC) and the 50 S ribosomal subunit, leading to formation of the 70 S initiation complex (70SIC), is a critical step of the translation initiation pathway. The 70SIC contains initiator tRNA, fMet-tRNA(fMet), bound in the P (peptidyl)-site in response to the AUG start codon. We have formulated a quantitative kinetic scheme for the formation of an active 70SIC from 30SIC and 50 S subunits on the basis of parallel rapid kinetics measurements of GTP hydrolysis, Pi release, light-scattering, and changes in fluorescence intensities of fluorophore-labeled IF2 and fMet-tRNA(f)(Met). According to this scheme, an initially formed labile 70 S complex, which promotes rapid IF2-dependent GTP hydrolysis, either dissociates reversibly into 30 S and 50 S subunits or is converted to a more stable form, leading to 70SIC formation. The latter process takes place with intervening conformational changes of ribosome-bound IF2 and fMet-tRNA(fMet), which are monitored by spectral changes of fluorescent derivatives of IF2 and fMet-tRNA(fMet). The availability of such a scheme provides a useful framework for precisely elucidating the mechanisms by which substituting the non-hydrolyzable analog GDPCP for GTP or adding thiostrepton inhibit formation of a productive 70SIC. GDPCP does not affect stable 70 S formation, but perturbs fMet-tRNA(fMet) positioning in the P-site. In contrast, thiostrepton severely retards stable 70 S formation, but allows normal binding of fMet-tRNA(fMet)(prf20) to the P-site.     

Characterization of 16S rRNA mutations that decrease the fidelity of translation initiation

In bacteria, initiation of translation is kinetically controlled by factors IF1, IF2, and IF3, which work in conjunction with the 30S subunit to ensure accurate selection of the initiator tRNA (fMet-tRNA(fMet)) and the start codon. Here, we show that mutations G1338A and A790G of 16S rRNA decrease initiation fidelity in vivo and do so in distinct ways. Mutation G1338A increases the affinity of tRNA(fMet) for the 30S subunit, suggesting that G1338 normally forms a suboptimal Type II interaction with fMet-tRNA(fMet). By stabilizing fMet-tRNA(fMet) in the preinitiation complex, G1338A may partially compensate for mismatches in the codon-anti-codon helix and thereby increase spurious initiation. Unlike G1338A, A790G decreases the affinity of IF3 for the 30S subunit. This may indirectly stabilize fMet-tRNA(fMet) in the preinitiation complex and/or promote premature docking of the 50S subunit, resulting in increased levels of spurious initiation.     

The Cryo-EM structure of a complete 30S translation initiation complex from Escherichia coli

Formation of the 30S initiation complex (30S IC) is an important checkpoint in regulation of gene expression. The selection of mRNA, correct start codon, and the initiator fMet-tRNA(fMet) requires the presence of three initiation factors (IF1, IF2, IF3) of which IF3 and IF1 control the fidelity of the process, while IF2 recruits fMet-tRNA(fMet). Here we present a cryo-EM reconstruction of the complete 30S IC, containing mRNA, fMet-tRNA(fMet), IF1, IF2, and IF3. In the 30S IC, IF2 contacts IF1, the 30S subunit shoulder, and the CCA end of fMet-tRNA(fMet), which occupies a novel P/I position (P/I1). The N-terminal domain of IF3 contacts the tRNA, whereas the C-terminal domain is bound to the platform of the 30S subunit. Binding of initiation factors and fMet-tRNA(fMet) induces a rotation of the head relative to the body of the 30S subunit, which is likely to prevail through 50S subunit joining until GTP hydrolysis and dissociation of IF2 take place. The structure provides insights into the mechanism of mRNA selection during translation initiation.     

The cryo-EM structure of a translation initiation complex from Escherichia coli

The 70S ribosome and its complement of factors required for initiation of translation in E. coli were purified separately and reassembled in vitro with GDPNP, producing a stable initiation complex (IC) stalled after 70S assembly. We have obtained a cryo-EM reconstruction of the IC showing IF2*GDPNP at the intersubunit cleft of the 70S ribosome. IF2*GDPNP contacts the 30S and 50S subunits as well as fMet-tRNA(fMet). IF2 here adopts a conformation radically different from that seen in the recent crystal structure of IF2. The C-terminal domain of IF2 binds to the single-stranded portion of fMet-tRNA(fMet), thereby forcing the tRNA into a novel orientation at the P site. The GTP binding domain of IF2 binds to the GTPase-associated center of the 50S subunit in a manner similar to EF-G and EF-Tu. Additionally, we present evidence for the localization of IF1, IF3, one C-terminal domain of L7/L12, and the N-terminal domain of IF2 in the initiation complex.     

Conformational transition of initiation factor 2 from the GTP- to GDP-bound state visualized on the ribosome

Initiation of protein synthesis is a universally conserved event that requires initiation factors IF1, IF2 and IF3 in prokaryotes. IF2 is a GTPase essential for binding initiator transfer RNA to the 30S ribosomal subunit and recruiting the 50S subunit into the 70S initiation complex. We present two cryo-EM structures of the assembled 70S initiation complex comprising mRNA, fMet-tRNA(fMet) and IF2 with either a non-hydrolyzable GTP analog or GDP. Transition from the GTP-bound to the GDP-bound state involves substantial conformational changes of IF2 and of the entire ribosome. In the GTP analog-bound state, IF2 interacts mostly with the 30S subunit and extends to the initiator tRNA in the peptidyl (P) site, whereas in the GDP-bound state IF2 steps back and adopts a 'ready-to-leave' conformation. Our data also provide insights into the molecular mechanism guiding release of IF1 and IF3.     

Interaction between non-formylated initiator Met-tRNA(fMet) and the ribosomal A-site from Escherichia coli

We report studies in vitro of the interaction between non-formylated initiator Met-tRNA(fMet) and 70S ribosomes. The binding of Met-tRNA(fMet) to ribosomes carrying fMet-tRNA(fMet) in the P-site is strongly stimulated by elongation factor EF-Tu:GTP in the presence of (AUG)3. The enzymatically bound Met-tRNA(fMet) does not react with puromycin. The bound Met-tRNA(fMet) can accept formylmethionine from P-site-bound fMet-tRNA(fMet). These results demonstrate a functionally active binding at the ribosomal A-site. Partial ribonuclease digestion (footprinting) was used to study the sites in Met-tRNA(fMet) which are involved in the interaction with the ribosomal A-site. The results show that a large part of the tRNA molecule is protected by the ribosome against ribonuclease digestion. In addition to the protection found in the amino acid region and the anticodon arm, protection is seen in the D-loop and in the extra arm. No region within the bound tRNA is found to be more accessible for RNases than in the free Met-tRNA(fMet). The reported enhancement of ribonuclease cuts in the D- and T-arms of A-site-bound Phe-tRNAPhe is thus not found in A-site bound Met-tRNA(fMet).     

Mapping the fMet-tRNA(f)(Met) binding site of initiation factor IF2

The interaction between fMet-tRNA(f)(Met) and Bacillus stearothermophilus translation initiation factor IF2 has been characterized. We demonstrate that essentially all thermodynamic determinants governing the stability and the specificity of this interaction are localized within the acceptor hexanucleotide fMet-3'ACCAAC of the initiator tRNA and a fairly small area at the surface of the beta-barrel structure of the 90-amino acid C-terminal domain of IF2 (IF2 C-2). A weak but specific interaction between IF2 C-2 and formyl-methionyl was also demonstrated. The surface of IF2 C-2 interacting with fMet-tRNA(f)(Met) has been mapped using two independent approaches, site- directed mutagenesis and NMR spectroscopy, which yielded consistent results. The binding site comprises C668 and G715 located in a groove accommodating the methionyl side-chain, R700, in the vicinity of the formyl group, Y701 and K702 close to the acyl bond between fMet and tRNA(f)(Met), and the surface lined with residues K702-S660, along which the acceptor arm of the initiator tRNA spans in the direction 3' to 5'.     

Interaction of fMet-tRNA(fMet) with the C-terminal domain of translational initiation factor IF2 from Bacillus stearothermophilus

Analytical ultracentrifugation studies indicated that the C-terminal domains of IF2 comprising amino acid residues 520-741 (IF2 C) and 632-741 (IF2 C-2) bind fMet-tRNA with similar affinities (K(d) at 25 degrees C equal to 0.27 and 0.23 microM, respectively). Complex formation between fMet-tRNA(fMet) and IF2 C or IF2 C-2 is accompanied by barely detectable spectral changes as demonstrated by a comparison of the Raman spectra of the complexes with the calculated sum of the spectra of the individual components. These results and the temperature dependence of the K(d) of the protein-RNA complexes indicate that complex formation is not accompanied by obvious conformational changes of the components, and possibly depends on a rather small binding site comprising only a few interacting residues of both components.     

Structure of the fMet-tRNA(fMet)-binding domain of B. stearothermophilus initiation factor IF2

The three-dimensional structure of the fMet-tRNA(fMet) -binding domain of translation initiation factor IF2 from Bacillus stearothermophilus has been determined by heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy. Its structure consists of six antiparallel beta-strands, connected via loops, and forms a closed beta-barrel similar to domain II of elongation factors EF-Tu and EF-G, despite low sequence homology. Two structures of the ternary complexes of the EF-Tu small middle dotaminoacyl-tRNA small middle dot GDP analogue have been reported and were used to propose and discuss the possible fMet-tRNA(fMet)-binding site of IF2.     

Relationship between size of mRNA ribosomal binding site and initiation factor function

The rate and the extent of the binding of initiator fMet-tRNA(fMet) to 30S ribosomal subunits in the presence of IF1, IF2 and GTP is either inhibited or slightly stimulated by the presence of IF3 depending on whether the initiation triplet AUG or the polynucleotide poly(AUG) is used as template. To determine the length of the template required for the transition from the AUG- to the poly(AUG)-type of behavior in the presence of IF3, the ribosomal binding of fMet-tRNA was studied in response to AUG triplets extended on either the 5'- or the 3'-side by stretches of homo-oligonucleotides of different lengths. When the binding of fMet-tRNA was studied at equilibrium it was found that IF3 no longer inhibits the amount of ternary complex formed if AUG is extended either 10 nucleotides on the 5'- or 35-40 nucleotides on the 3'-side. When the initial rate of ternary complex formation is considered, shorter extensions (4 nucleotides on the 5'-side or 20-30 nucleotides on the 3'-side) are sufficient to elicit a substantial stimulation by IF3. These results are discussed in relation to the mechanism of action of the initiation factors in the selection of the initiation region of the mRNA by ribosomes.     

The translational fidelity function of IF3 during transition from the 30 S initiation complex to the 70 S initiation complex

IF3 has a fidelity function in the initiation of translation, inducing the dissociation of fMet-tRNA(fMet) from the 30 S initiation complexes (30SIC) containing a non-canonical initiation triplet (e.g. AUU) in place of a canonical initiation triplet (e.g., AUG). IF2 has a complementary role, selectively promoting initiator tRNA binding to the ribosome. Here, we used parallel rapid kinetics measurements of GTP hydrolysis, Pi release, light-scattering, and changes in intensities of fluorophore-labeled IF2 and fMet-tRNA(fMet) to determine the effects on both 30SIC formation and 30SIC conversion to 70 S initiation complexes (70SIC) of (a) substituting AUG with AUU, and/or (b) omitting IF3, and/or (c) replacing GTP with the non-hydrolyzable analog GDPCP. We demonstrate that the presence or absence of IF3 has, at most, minor effects on the rate of 30SIC formation using either AUG or AUU as the initiation codon, and conclude that the high affinity of IF2 for both 30 S subunit and initiator tRNA overrides any perturbation of the codon-anticodon interaction resulting from AUU for AUG substitution. In contrast, replacement of AUG by AUU leads to a dramatic reduction in the rate of 70SIC formation from 30SIC upon addition of 50 S subunits. Interpreting our results in the framework of a quantitative kinetic scheme leads to the conclusion that, within the overall process of 70SIC formation, the step most affected by substituting AUU for AUG involves the conversion of an initially labile 70 S ribosome into a more stable complex. In the absence of IF3, the difference between AUG and AUU largely disappears, with each initiation codon affording rapid 70SIC formation, leading to the hypothesis that it is the rate of IF3 dissociation from the 70 S ribosome during IC70S formation that is critical to its fidelity function.     

Structural and functional domains of E coli initiation factor IF2.

Initiation of translation in prokaryotes requires the participation of at least three soluble proteins: the initiation factors IF1, IF2 and IF3. Initiation factor 2, which is one of the largest proteins involved in translation (97.3 kDa) has been shown to stimulate in vitro the binding of fMet-tRNA(fMet) to the 30S ribosomal subunit. After formation of 70S translation initiation complex, IF2 is believed to participate in GTP hydrolysis, thereby promoting its own release. Here we review evidence which indicates the functional importance of the different structural domains of IF2, emphasizing new information obtained by in vivo experiments.     

Development of a high-throughput scintillation proximity assay for the identification of C-domain translational initiation factor 2 inhibitors

Translational initiation factor 2 (IF2) is the largest of the 3 factors required for translation initiation in prokaryotes and has been shown to be essential in Escherichia coli. It stimulates the binding of fMet-tRNA(f)(Met) to the 30S ribosomal subunit in the presence of GTP. The selectivity is achieved through specific recognition of the tRNA(f)(Met) blocked alpha-amino group. IF2 is composed of 3 structural domains: N-domain, whose function is not known; G-domain, which contains the GTP/GDP binding site and the GTPase catalytic center; and C-domain, which recognizes and binds fMet-tRNA(f)(Met). Its activity is strictly bacteria specific and highly conserved among prokaryotes. So far, antibiotics targeting IF2 function are not known, and this makes it an ideal target for new drugs with mechanisms of resistance not yet developed. A few assays have been developed in the past, which allow the detection of IF2 activity either directly or indirectly. In both instances, the assays are based on radioactive detection and do not allow for high throughput because of the need for separation or solvent extraction steps. The authors describe a novel biochemical assay for IF2 that exploits the molecular recognition of fMet-tRNA(f)(Met) by the C-domain. The assay is based on the incubation of biotinyl-IF2 with fMet-tRNA(f)(Met) and the subsequent capture of the radiolabeled complex by streptavidin-coated beads, exploiting the scintillation proximity assay (SPA) technology. The assay has been designed in an automatable, homogeneous, miniaturized fashion suitable for high-throughput screening and is rapid, sensitive, and robust to dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) up to 10% v/v. The assay, used to screen a limited chemical collection of about 5000 compounds and a subset of compounds originated by a 2-D substructural search, has shown to be able to detect potential IF2 inhibitors.     

A model for the interaction of the G3‐subdomain of Geobacillus stearothermophilus IF2 with the 30S ribosomal subunit

Bacterial translation initiation factor IF2 complexed with GTP binds to the 30S ribosomal subunit, promotes ribosomal binding of fMet‐tRNA, and favors the joining of the small and large ribosomal subunits yielding a 70S initiation complex ready to enter the translation elongation phase. Within the IF2 molecule subdomain G3, which is believed to play an important role in the IF2‐30S interaction, is positioned between the GTP‐binding G2 and the fMet‐tRNA binding C‐terminal subdomains. In this study the solution structure of subdomain G3 of Geobacillus stearothermophilus IF2 has been elucidated. G3 forms a core structure consisting of two β‐sheets with each four anti‐parallel strands, followed by a C‐terminal α‐helix. In line with its role as linker between G3 and subdomain C1, this helix has no well‐defined orientation but is endowed with a dynamic nature. The structure of the G3 core is that of a typical OB‐fold module, similar to that of the corresponding subdomain of Thermus thermophilus IF2, and to that of other known RNA‐binding modules such as IF2‐C2, IF1 and subdomains II of elongation factors EF‐Tu and EF‐G. Structural comparisons have resulted in a model that describes the interaction between IF2‐G3 and the 30S ribosomal subunit.     

Late events of translation initiation in bacteria: a kinetic analysis

Binding of the 50S ribosomal subunit to the 30S initiation complex and the subsequent transition from the initiation to the elongation phase up to the synthesis of the first peptide bond represent crucial steps in the translation pathway. The reactions that characterize these transitions were analyzed by quench-flow and fluorescence stopped-flow kinetic techniques. IF2-dependent GTP hydrolysis was fast (30/s) followed by slow P(i) release from the complex (1.5/s). The latter step was rate limiting for subsequent A-site binding of EF-Tu small middle dotGTP small middle dotPhe-tRNA(Phe) ternary complex. Most of the elemental rate constants of A-site binding were similar to those measured on poly(U), with the notable exception of the formation of the first peptide bond which occurred at a rate of 0.2/s. Omission of GTP or its replacement with GDP had no effect, indicating that neither the adjustment of fMet-tRNA(fMet) in the P site nor the release of IF2 from the ribosome required GTP hydrolysis.     

The ribosome‐bound initiation factor 2 recruits initiator tRNA to the 30S initiation complex

Bacterial translation initiation factor 2 (IF2) is a GTPase that promotes the binding of the initiator fMet‐tRNA^fMet to the 30S ribosomal subunit. It is often assumed that IF2 delivers fMet‐tRNA^fMet to the ribosome in a ternary complex, IF2·GTP·fMet‐tRNA^fMet. By using rapid kinetic techniques, we show here that binding of IF2·GTP to the 30S ribosomal subunit precedes and is independent of fMet‐tRNA^fMet binding. The ternary complex formed in solution by IF2·GTP and fMet‐tRNA is unstable and dissociates before IF2·GTP and, subsequently, fMet‐tRNA^fMet bind to the 30S subunit. Ribosome‐bound IF2 might accelerate the recruitment of fMet‐tRNA^fMet to the 30S initiation complex by providing anchoring interactions or inducing a favourable ribosome conformation. The mechanism of action of IF2 seems to be different from that of tRNA carriers such as EF‐Tu, SelB and eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2), instead resembling that of eIF5B, the eukaryotic subunit association factor.     

Tandem translation of E. coli initiation factor IF2 beta: purification and characterization in vitro of two active forms.

Two forms of E. coli initiation factor IF2, IF2 alpha and IF2 beta, have been known for several years. Both forms are products of the gene infB with translational initiation at codon 1 (AUG) and codon 158 (GUG) in the same reading frame. In this work we demonstrate that IF2 beta exists in two forms, IF2 beta and IF2 beta' with initiation codons 158 (GUG) and 165 (AUG) and molecular masses of 79.7 kDa and 78.8 kDa respectively. We have recently described a fast purification method for IF2 alpha, using an FPLC procedure consisting of ion-exchange liquid chromatography on Q Sepharose HP, Mono Q and Mono S. After the Mono Q step, an apparently homogeneous IF2 beta was observed when analyzed by SDS-PAGE. However the chromatography on Mono S results in the elution of two peaks containing IF2 beta. The N-terminal amino acid sequence of the two proteins identified the first peak to be IF2 beta and the second as a protein which we term IF2 beta' starting seven residues downstream at the AUG codon 165. The activity in vitro of the two purified forms of IF2 beta was tested by measuring the stimulation of binding of the initiator fMet-tRNA(fMet) to 70S ribosomes in the presence of GTP and poly(A,U,G) as messenger-RNA. In this assay no difference in activity is detected.