Architecture of nucleotide excision repair complexes: DNA is wrapped by UvrB before and after damage recognition

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a major DNA repair mechanism that recognizes a broad range of DNA damages. In Escherichia coli, damage recognition in NER is accomplished by the UvrA and UvrB proteins. We have analysed the structural properties of the different protein-DNA complexes formed by UvrA, UvrB and (damaged) DNA using atomic force microscopy. Analysis of the UvrA(2)B complex in search of damage revealed the DNA to be wrapped around the UvrB protein, comprising a region of about seven helical turns. In the UvrB-DNA pre-incision complex the DNA is wrapped in a similar way and this DNA configuration is dependent on ATP binding. Based on these results, a role for DNA wrapping in damage recognition is proposed. Evidence is presented that DNA wrapping in the pre-incision complex also stimulates the rate of incision by UvrC.     

Interactions between UvrA and UvrB: the role of UvrB's domain 2 in nucleotide excision repair

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a highly conserved DNA repair mechanism present in all kingdoms of life. UvrB is a central component of the bacterial NER system, participating in damage recognition, strand excision and repair synthesis. None of the three presently available crystal structures of UvrB has defined the structure of domain 2, which is critical for the interaction with UvrA. We have solved the crystal structure of the UvrB Y96A variant, which reveals a new fold for domain 2 and identifies highly conserved residues located on its surface. These residues are restricted to the face of UvrB important for DNA binding and may be critical for the interaction of UvrB with UvrA. We have mutated these residues to study their role in the incision reaction, formation of the pre-incision complex, destabilization of short duplex regions in DNA, binding to UvrA and ATP hydrolysis. Based on the structural and biochemical data, we conclude that domain 2 is required for a productive UvrA-UvrB interaction, which is a pre-requisite for all subsequent steps in nucleotide excision repair.     

Mycobacterium tuberculosis UvrB forms dimers in solution and interacts with UvrA in the absence of ligands

During its life cycle Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) must face a variety of environmental and endogenous physical and chemical stresses that could produce genotoxic damage. However, MTB possesses efficient systems to counteract the harmful effects of DNA‐damaging assaults. The nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a highly conserved multi‐enzymatic cascade that is initiated by the concerted action of three core proteins, that is UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC. Although the functional roles of these enzymes are well characterized, the intra‐pathway coordination of the NER components and the dynamics of their association is still a matter of debate. In the presented study, we analyzed the hydrodynamic properties and the oligomeric state of the MTB UvrB protein (MtUvrB) that we expressed and purified to homogeneity in a tag‐free form. Our results show that, differently to what has been previously observed for the His‐tagged version of the protein, MtUvrB forms dimers in solution, which are characterized by an elongated shape, as determined by small‐angle X‐ray scattering analysis. Moreover, to gain insights into the mycobacterial UvrA/UvrB lesion sensing/tracking complex we adopted a size‐exclusion chromatography‐based approach, revealing that the two proteins interact in the absence of ligands, leading to the assembling of A₂B₂ hetero‐tetramers in solution. Surface plasmon resonance analysis showed that the dissociation constant of the MtUvrA/MtUvrB complex falls in the low micromolar range that could represent the basis for a fine modulation of the complex architecture accompanying the multi‐step DNA repair activity of mycobacterial NER.     

Cooperative damage recognition by UvrA and UvrB: identification of UvrA residues that mediate DNA binding

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is responsible for the recognition and removal of numerous structurally unrelated DNA lesions. In prokaryotes, the proteins UvrA, UvrB and UvrC orchestrate the recognition and excision of aberrant lesions from DNA. Despite the progress we have made in understanding the NER pathway, it remains unclear how the UvrA dimer interacts with DNA to facilitate DNA damage recognition. The purpose of this study was to define amino acid residues in UvrA that provide binding energy to DNA. Based on conservation among approximately 300 UvrA sequences and 3D-modeling, two positively charged residues, Lys680 and Arg691, were predicted to be important for DNA binding. Mutagenesis and biochemical analysis of Bacillus caldontenax UvrA variant proteins containing site directed mutations at these residues demonstrate that Lys680 and Arg691 make a significant contribution toward the DNA binding affinity of UvrA. Replacing these side chains with alanine or negatively charged residues decreased UvrA binding 3-37-fold. Survival studies indicated that these mutant proteins complemented a WP2 uvrA(-) strain of bacteria 10-100% of WT UvrA levels. Further analysis by DNase I footprinting of the double UvrA mutant revealed that the UvrA DNA binding defects caused a slower rate of transfer of DNA to UvrB. Consequently, the mutants initiated the oligonucleotide incision assay nearly as well as WT UvrA thus explaining the observed mild phenotype in the survival assay. Based on our findings we propose a model of how UvrA binds to DNA.     

Movement of the β-hairpin in the third zinc-binding module of UvrA is required for DNA damage recognition

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is distinguished from other DNA repair pathways by its ability to process various DNA lesions. In bacterial NER, UvrA is the key protein that detects damage and initiates the downstream NER cascade. Although it is known that UvrA preferentially binds to damaged DNA, the mechanism for damage recognition is unclear. A β-hairpin in the third Zn-binding module (Zn3hp) of UvrA has been suggested to undergo a conformational change upon DNA binding, and proposed to be important for damage sensing. Here, we investigate the contribution of the dynamics in the Zn3hp structural element to various activities of UvrA during the early steps of NER. By restricting the movement of the Zn3hp using disulfide crosslinking, we showed that the movement of the Zn3hp is required for damage-specific binding, UvrB loading and ATPase activities of UvrA. We individually inactivated each of the nucleotide binding sites in UvrA to investigate its role in the movement of the Zn3hp. Our results suggest that the conformational change of the Zn3hp is controlled by ATP hydrolysis at the distal nucleotide binding site. We propose a bi-phasic damage inspection model of UvrA in which movement of the Zn3hp plays a key role in damage recognition.     

Controlled degradation by ClpXP protease tunes the levels of the excision repair protein UvrA to the extent of DNA damage

UV irradiation damages DNA and activates expression of genes encoding proteins helpful for survival under DNA stress. These proteins are often deleterious in the absence of DNA damage. Here, we investigate mechanisms used to regulate the levels of DNA-repair proteins during recovery by studying control of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) protein UvrA. We show that UvrA is induced after UV irradiation and reaches maximum levels between ∼20 and 120 min post UV. During post-UV recovery, UvrA levels decrease principally as a result of ClpXP-dependent protein degradation. The rate of UvrA degradation depends on the amount of unrepaired pyrimidine dimers present; this degradation rate is initially slow shortly after UV, but increases as damage is repaired. This increase in UvrA degradation as repair progresses is also influenced by protein–protein interactions. Genetic and in vitro experiments support the conclusion that UvrA–UvrB interactions antagonize degradation. In contrast, Mfd appears to act as an enhancer of UvrA turnover. Thus, our results reveal that a complex network of interactions contribute to tuning the level of UvrA in the cell in response to the extent of DNA damage and nicely mirror findings with excision repair proteins from eukaryotes, which are controlled by proteolysis in a similar manner.     

Role of the Escherichia coli nucleotide excision repair proteins in DNA replication

DNA polymerase I (PolI) functions both in nucleotide excision repair (NER) and in the processing of Okazaki fragments that are generated on the lagging strand during DNA replication. Escherichia coli cells completely lacking the PolI enzyme are viable as long as they are grown on minimal medium. Here we show that viability is fully dependent on the presence of functional UvrA, UvrB, and UvrD (helicase II) proteins but does not require UvrC. In contrast, delta polA cells grow even better when the uvrC gene has been deleted. Apparently UvrA, UvrB, and UvrD are needed in a replication backup system that replaces the PolI function, and UvrC interferes with this alternative replication pathway. With specific mutants of UvrC we could show that the inhibitory effect of this protein is related to its catalytic activity that on damaged DNA is responsible for the 3' incision reaction. Specific mutants of UvrA and UvrB were also studied for their capacity to support the PolI-independent replication. Deletion of the UvrC-binding domain of UvrB resulted in a phenotype similar to that caused by deletion of the uvrC gene, showing that the inhibitory incision activity of UvrC is mediated via binding to UvrB. A mutation in the N-terminal zinc finger domain of UvrA does not affect NER in vivo or in vitro. The same mutation, however, does give inviability in combination with the delta polA mutation. Apparently the N-terminal zinc-binding domain of UvrA has specifically evolved for a function outside DNA repair. A model for the function of the UvrA, UvrB, and UvrD proteins in the alternative replication pathway is discussed.     

A Structural Model for the Damage-sensing Complex in Bacterial Nucleotide Excision Repair

Nucleotide excision repair is distinguished from other DNA repair pathways by its ability to process a wide range of structurally unrelated DNA lesions. In bacteria, damage recognition is achieved by the UvrA·UvrB ensemble. Here, we report the structure of the complex between the interaction domains of UvrA and UvrB. These domains are necessary and sufficient for full-length UvrA and UvrB to associate and thereby form the DNA damage-sensing complex of bacterial nucleotide excision repair. The crystal structure and accompanying biochemical analyses suggest a model for the complete damage-sensing complex.Nucleotide excision repair is distinguished from other DNA repair pathways by its ability to process a diverse set of lesions. In bacteria, the initial steps are carried out by three proteins: UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC. The UvrA·UvrB complex conducts surveillance of DNA and recognizes damage. Having located a lesion, UvrA “loads” UvrB onto the DNA at the damaged sites and then dissociates. Damage searching, formation of the UvrB·DNA “preincision” complex, and dissociation of UvrA are regulated by ATP (1). UvrB subsequently recruits the endonuclease UvrC, which catalyzes incisions on either side of the lesion (2, 3). Following incision, UvrC and the damage-containing oligonucleotide are removed by UvrD (helicase II), whereas UvrB remains bound to the gapped DNA and recruits DNA polymerase I for repair synthesis. Sealing of the single-stranded nick completes the repair process and restores the original DNA sequence (4).Since its discovery more than 40 years ago, bacterial nucleotide excision repair has been extensively studied, resulting in a large body of work that describes the protein components and the details of how they operate. Notwithstanding the trove of genetic and biochemical data, several key questions remain unanswered. For example, how does the same set of proteins handle a diverse set of lesions while maintaining specificity? How do UvrA and UvrB cooperate during damage recognition, and what is the precise role of ATP? Ongoing studies in the field, including those described below, aim to address these issues.Recently, we reported the structure of Geobacillus stearothermophilus UvrA and the identification of binding sites for DNA and UvrB (5). We also established that the identified UvrB-binding domain is necessary and sufficient to mediate the UvrA-UvrB interaction and that the isolated interaction domains of UvrA (5) and UvrB (6) bind to each other in solution.To understand the interaction between UvrA and UvrB, we have determined the crystal structure of the complex between the two isolated interaction domains. The structure revealed that UvrA-UvrB interaction interface is largely polar, mediated by several highly conserved charged residues. Site-directed mutagenesis and biochemical characterization of the mutant proteins confirmed the importance of the observed interactions. Based on the interaction domain complex structure, we have constructed a structural model for the full-length UvrA·UvrB ensemble and propose two models for lesion recognition that will serve as a basis for future experiments.     

Role of the two ATPase domains of Escherichia coli UvrA in binding non-bulky DNA lesions and interaction with UvrB

The UvrA protein is the initial DNA damage-sensing protein in bacterial nucleotide excision repair and detects a wide variety of structurally unrelated lesions. After initial recognition of DNA damage, UvrA loads the UvrB protein onto the DNA. This protein then verifies the presence of a lesion, after which UvrA is released from the DNA.UvrA contains two ATPase domains, both belonging to the ABC ATPase superfamily. We have determined the activities of two mutants, in which a single domain was deactivated. Inactivation of either one ATPase domain in Escherichia coli UvrA results in a complete loss of ATPase activity, indicating that both domains function in a cooperative way. We could show that this ATPase activity is not required for the recognition of bulky lesions by UvrA, but it does promote the specific binding to the less distorting cyclobutane–pyrimidine dimer (CPD). The two ATPase mutants also show a difference in UvrB-loading, depending on the length of the DNA substrate. The ATPase domain I mutant was capable of loading UvrB on a lesion in a 50 bp fragment, but this loading was reduced on a longer substrate. For the ATPase domain II mutant the opposite was found: UvrB could not be loaded on a 50 bp substrate, but this loading was rescued when the length of the fragment was increased. This differential loading of UvrB by the two ATPase mutants could be related to different interactions between the UvrA and UvrB subunits.     

Identification of a chemical that inhibits the mycobacterial UvrABC complex in nucleotide excision repair

Bacterial DNA can be damaged by reactive nitrogen and oxygen intermediates (RNI and ROI) generated by host immunity, as well as by antibiotics that trigger bacterial production of ROI. Thus a pathogen's ability to repair its DNA may be important for persistent infection. A prominent role for nucleotide excision repair (NER) in disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) was suggested by attenuation of uvrB-deficient Mtb in mice. However, it was unknown if Mtb's Uvr proteins could execute NER. Here we report that recombinant UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC from Mtb collectively bound and cleaved plasmid DNA exposed to ultraviolet (UV) irradiation or peroxynitrite. We used the DNA incision assay to test the mechanism of action of compounds identified in a high-throughput screen for their ability to delay recovery of M. smegmatis from UV irradiation. 2-(5-Amino-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-ylbenzo[f]chromen-3-one) (ATBC) but not several closely related compounds inhibited cleavage of damaged DNA by UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC without intercalating in DNA and impaired recovery of M. smegmatis from UV irradiation. ATBC did not affect bacterial growth in the absence of UV exposure, nor did it exacerbate the growth defect of UV-irradiated mycobacteria that lacked uvrB. Thus, ATBC appears to be a cell-penetrant, selective inhibitor of mycobacterial NER. Chemical inhibitors of NER may facilitate studies of the role of NER in prokaryotic pathobiology.     

The nucleotide excision repair protein UvrB, a helicase-like enzyme with a catch

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a universal DNA repair mechanism found in all three kingdoms of life. Its ability to repair a broad range of DNA lesions sets NER apart from other repair mechanisms. NER systems recognize the damaged DNA strand and cleave it 3', then 5' to the lesion. After the oligonucleotide containing the lesion is removed, repair synthesis fills the resulting gap. UvrB is the central component of bacterial NER. It is directly involved in distinguishing damaged from undamaged DNA and guides the DNA from recognition to repair synthesis. Recently solved structures of UvrB from different organisms represent the first high-resolution view into bacterial NER. The structures provide detailed insight into the domain architecture of UvrB and, through comparison, suggest possible domain movements. The structure of UvrB consists of five domains. Domains 1a and 3 bind ATP at the inter-domain interface and share high structural similarity to helicases of superfamilies I and II. Not related to helicase structures, domains 2 and 4 are involved in interactions with either UvrA or UvrC, whereas domain 1b was implicated for DNA binding. The structures indicate that ATP binding and hydrolysis is associated with domain motions. UvrB's ATPase activity, however, is not coupled to the separation of long DNA duplexes as in helicases, but rather leads to the formation of the preincision complex with the damaged DNA substrate. The location of conserved residues and structural comparisons with helicase-DNA structures suggest how UvrB might bind to DNA. A model of the UvrB-DNA interaction in which a beta-hairpin of UvrB inserts between the DNA double strand has been proposed recently. This padlock model is developed further to suggest two distinct consequences of domain motion: in the UvrA(2)B-DNA complex, domain motions lead to translocation along the DNA, whereas in the tight UvrB-DNA pre-incision complex, they lead to distortion of the 3' incision site.     

The presence of two UvrB subunits in the UvrAB complex ensures damage detection in both DNA strands

It is generally accepted that the damage recognition complex of nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli consists of two UvrA and one UvrB molecule, and that in the preincision complex UvrB binds to the damage as a monomer. Using scanning force microscopy, we show here that the damage recognition complex consists of two UvrA and two UvrB subunits, with the DNA wrapped around one of the UvrB monomers. Upon binding the damage and release of the UvrA subunits, UvrB remains a dimer in the preincision complex. After association with the UvrC protein, one of the UvrB monomers is released. We propose a model in which the presence of two UvrB subunits ensures damage recognition in both DNA strands. Upon binding of the UvrA(2)B(2) complex to a putative damaged site, the DNA wraps around one of the UvrB monomers, which will subsequently probe one of the DNA strands for the presence of a lesion. When no damage is found, the DNA will wrap around the second UvrB subunit, which will check the other strand for aberrations.     

Strand opening by the UvrA(2)B complex allows dynamic recognition of DNA damage.

Repair proteins alter the local DNA structure during nucleotide excision repair (NER). However, the precise role of DNA melting remains unknown. A series of DNA substrates containing a unique site-specific BPDE-guanine adduct in a region of non-complementary bases were examined for incision by the Escherichia coli UvrBC endonuclease in the presence or absence of UvrA. UvrBC formed a pre-incision intermediate with a DNA substrate containing a 6-base bubble structure with 2 unpaired bases 5' and 3 unpaired bases 3' to the adduct. Formation of this bubble served as a dynamic recognition step in damage processing. UvrB or UvrBC may form one of three stable repair intermediates with DNA substrates, depending upon the state of the DNA surrounding the modified base. The dual incisions were strongly determined by the distance between the adduct and the double-stranded-single-stranded DNA junction of the bubble, and required homologous double-stranded DNA at both incision sites. Remarkably, in the absence of UvrA, UvrBC nuclease can make both 3' and 5' incisions on substrates with bubbles of 3-6 nucleotides, and an uncoupled 5' incision on bubbles of >/=>/=10 nucleotides. These data support the hypothesis that the E.coli and human NER systems recognize and process DNA damage in a highly conserved manner.     

Oxidative DNA damage defense systems in avoidance of stationary-phase mutagenesis in Pseudomonas putida

Oxidative damage of DNA is a source of mutation in living cells. Although all organisms have evolved mechanisms of defense against oxidative damage, little is known about these mechanisms in nonenteric bacteria, including pseudomonads. Here we have studied the involvement of oxidized guanine (GO) repair enzymes and DNA-protecting enzyme Dps in the avoidance of mutations in starving Pseudomonas putida. Additionally, we examined possible connections between the oxidative damage of DNA and involvement of the error-prone DNA polymerase (Pol)V homologue RulAB in stationary-phase mutagenesis in P. putida. Our results demonstrated that the GO repair enzymes MutY, MutM, and MutT are involved in the prevention of base substitution mutations in carbon-starved P. putida. Interestingly, the antimutator effect of MutT was dependent on the growth phase of bacteria. Although the lack of MutT caused a strong mutator phenotype under carbon starvation conditions for bacteria, only a twofold increased effect on the frequency of mutations was observed for growing bacteria. This indicates that MutT has a backup system which efficiently complements the absence of this enzyme in actively growing cells. The knockout of MutM affected only the spectrum of mutations but did not change mutation frequency. Dps is known to protect DNA from oxidative damage. We found that dps-defective P. putida cells were more sensitive to sudden exposure to hydrogen peroxide than wild-type cells. At the same time, the absence of Dps did not affect the accumulation of mutations in populations of starved bacteria. Thus, it is possible that the protective role of Dps becomes essential for genome integrity only when bacteria are exposed to exogenous agents that lead to oxidative DNA damage but not under physiological conditions. Introduction of the Y family DNA polymerase PolV homologue rulAB into P. putida increased the proportion of A-to-C and A-to-G base substitutions among mutations, which occurred under starvation conditions. Since PolV is known to perform translesion synthesis past damaged bases in DNA (e.g., some oxidized forms of adenine), our results may imply that adenine oxidation products are also an important source of mutation in starving bacteria.     

DNA damage recognition of mutated forms of UvrB proteins in nucleotide excision repair

The DNA repair protein UvrB plays an indispensable role in the stepwise and sequential damage recognition of nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli. Our previous studies suggested that UvrB is responsible for the chemical damage recognition only upon a strand opening mediated by UvrA. Difficulties were encountered in studying the direct interaction of UvrB with adducts due to the presence of UvrA. We report herein that a single point mutation of Y95W in which a tyrosine is replaced by a tryptophan results in an UvrB mutant that is capable of efficiently binding to structure-specific DNA adducts even in the absence of UvrA. This mutant is fully functional in the UvrABC incisions. The dissociation constant for the mutant-DNA adduct interaction was less than 100 nM at physiological temperatures as determined by fluorescence spectroscopy. In contrast, similar substitutions at other residues in the beta-hairpin with tryptophan or phenylalanine do not confer UvrB such binding ability. Homology modeling of the structure of E. coli UvrB shows that the aromatic ring of residue Y95 and only Y95 directly points into the DNA binding cleft. We have also examined UvrB recognition of both "normal" bulky BPDE-DNA and protein-cross-linked DNA (DPC) adducts and the roles of aromatic residues of the beta-hairpin in the recognition of these lesions. A mutation of Y92W resulted in an obvious decrease in the efficiency of UvrABC incisions of normal adducts, while the incision of the DPC adduct is dramatically increased. Our results suggest that Y92 may function differently with these two types of adducts, while the Y95 residue plays an unique role in stabilizing the interaction of UvrB with DNA damage, most likely by a hydrophobic stacking.     

Analyzing the handoff of DNA from UvrA to UvrB utilizing DNA-protein photoaffinity labeling

To better define the molecular architecture of nucleotide excision repair intermediates it is necessary to identify the specific domains of UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC that are in close proximity to DNA damage during the repair process. One key step of nucleotide excision repair that is poorly understood is the transfer of damaged DNA from UvrA to UvrB, prior to incision by UvrC. To study this transfer, we have utilized two types of arylazido-modified photoaffinity reagents that probe residues in the Uvr proteins that are closest to either the damaged or non-damaged strands. The damaged strand probes consisted of dNTP analogs linked to a terminal arylazido moiety. These analogs were incorporated into double-stranded DNA using DNA polymerase beta and functioned as both the damage site and the cross-linking reagent. The non-damaged strand probe contained an arylazido moiety coupled to a phosphorothioate-modified backbone of an oligonucleotide opposite the damaged strand, which contained an internal fluorescein adduct. Six site-directed mutants of Bacillus caldotenax UvrB located in different domains within the protein (Y96A, E99A, R123A, R183E, F249A, and D510A), and two domain deletions (Delta2 and Deltabeta-hairpin), were assayed. Data gleaned from these mutants suggest that the handoff of damaged DNA from UvrA to UvrB proceeds in a three-step process: 1) UvrA and UvrB bind to the damaged site, with UvrA in direct contact; 2) a transfer reaction with UvrB contacting mostly the non-damaged DNA strand; 3) lesion engagement by the damage recognition pocket of UvrB with concomitant release of UvrA.     

In vivo repair of ENU-induced oxygen alkylation damage by the nucleotide excision repair mechanism in Drosophila melanogaster

DNA damage caused by oxygen alkylation of bases (mainly at O6-G, O4-T and O2-T positions in DNA) has been correlated with the mutagenic and carcinogenic potency of monofunctional alkylating agents. In all kinds of organisms, repair of O6-alkylG is carried out mainly by the enzyme O6-methyl guanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). However, little is known about the repair of the O-alkylT adducts or about the contribution of nucleotide excision repair (NER) to this process, especially in higher eukaryotes. To study the influence of the NER system on the repair of O-alkylation damage, the molecular mutation spectrum induced by N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) in an NER-deficient Drosophila strain, carrying a mutation at the mus201 locus, was obtained and compared with a previously published spectrum for NER-proficient conditions. This comparison reveals a clear increase in the frequency of base pair changes, including GC --> AT and AT --> GC transitions and AT --> TA transversions. In addition, one deletion and two frameshift mutations, not found under NER-proficient conditions, were isolated in the NER-deficient mutant. The results demonstrate that: (1) N-alkylation damage contributes considerably (more than 20%) to the mutagenic activity of ENU under NER-deficient conditions, confirming that the NER system repairs this kind of damage; and (2) that in germ cells of Drosophila in vivo, NER seems to repair O6-ethylguanine and/or O2-ethylcytosine, O4-ethylthymine, and possibly also O2-ethylthymine.     

Crystal structure of UvrB, a DNA helicase adapted for nucleotide excision repair

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a highly conserved DNA repair mechanism. NER systems recognize the damaged DNA strand, cleave it on both sides of the lesion, remove and newly synthesize the fragment. UvrB is a central component of the bacterial NER system participating in damage recognition, strand excision and repair synthesis. We have solved the crystal structure of UvrB in the apo and the ATP-bound forms. UvrB contains two domains related in structure to helicases, and two additional domains unique to repair proteins. The structure contains all elements of an intact helicase, and is evidence that UvrB utilizes ATP hydrolysis to move along the DNA to probe for damage. The location of conserved residues and structural comparisons allow us to predict the path of the DNA and suggest that the tight pre-incision complex of UvrB and the damaged DNA is formed by insertion of a flexible beta-hairpin between the two DNA strands.