Exploration of twin‐arginine translocation for expression and purification of correctly folded proteins in Escherichia coli

Historically, the general secretory (Sec) pathway of Gram‐negative bacteria has served as the primary route by which heterologous proteins are delivered to the periplasm in numerous expression and engineering applications. Here we have systematically examined the twin‐arginine translocation (Tat) pathway as an alternative, and possibly advantageous, secretion pathway for heterologous proteins. Overall, we found that: (i) export efficiency and periplasmic yield of a model substrate were affected by the composition of the Tat signal peptide, (ii) Tat substrates were correctly processed at their N‐termini upon reaching the periplasm and (iii) proteins fused to maltose‐binding protein (MBP) were reliably exported by the Tat system, but only when correctly folded; aberrantly folded MBP fusions were excluded by the Tat pathway's folding quality control feature. We also observed that Tat export yield was comparable to Sec for relatively small, well‐folded proteins, higher relative to Sec for proteins that required cytoplasmic folding, and lower relative to Sec for larger, soluble fusion proteins. Interestingly, the specific activity of material purified from the periplasm was higher for certain Tat substrates relative to their Sec counterparts, suggesting that Tat expression can give rise to relatively pure and highly active proteins in one step.     

Comparative analysis of twin-arginine (Tat)-dependent protein secretion of a heterologous model protein (GFP) in three different Gram-positive bacteria

In contrast to the general protein secretion (Sec) system, the twin-arginine translocation (Tat) export pathway allows the translocation of proteins across the bacterial plasma membrane in a fully folded conformation. Due to this feature, the Tat pathway provides an attractive alternative to the secretory production of heterologous proteins via the Sec system. In this study, the potential for Tat-dependent heterologous protein secretion was compared in the three Gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus carnosus, Bacillus subtilis, and Corynebacterium glutamicum using green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a model protein. In all three microorganisms, fusion of a Tat signal peptide to GFP resulted in its Tat-dependent translocation across the corresponding cytoplasmic membranes. However, striking differences with respect to the final localization and folding status of the exported GFP were observed. In S. carnosus, GFP was trapped entirely in the cell wall and not released into the supernatant. In B. subtilis, GFP was secreted into the supernatant, however, in an inactive form. In contrast, C. glutamicum effectively secreted active GFP. Our results clearly demonstrate that a comparative evaluation of different Gram-positive host microorganisms is a crucial step on the way to an efficient Tat-mediated secretory production process for a desired heterologous target protein. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. This paper is dedicated to Hermann Sahm on the occasion of his 65th birthday.     

High-yield export of a native heterologous protein to the periplasm by the tat translocation pathway in Escherichia coli

Numerous high‐value recombinant proteins that are produced in bacteria are exported to the periplasm as this approach offers relatively easy downstream processing and purification. Most recombinant proteins are exported by the Sec pathway, which transports them across the plasma membrane in an unfolded state. The twin‐arginine translocation (Tat) system operates in parallel with the Sec pathway but transports substrate proteins in a folded state; it therefore has potential to export proteins that are difficult to produce using the Sec pathway. In this study, we have produced a heterologous protein (green fluorescent protein; GFP) in Escherichia coli and have used batch and fed‐batch fermentation systems to test the ability of the newly engineered Tat system to export this protein into the periplasm under industrial‐type production conditions. GFP cannot be exported by the Sec pathway in an active form. We first tested the ability of five different Tat signal peptides to export GFP, and showed that the TorA signal peptide directed most efficient export. Under batch fermentation conditions, it was found that TorA‐GFP was exported efficiently in wild type cells, but a twofold increase in periplasmic GFP was obtained when the TatABC components were co‐expressed. In both cases, periplasmic GFP peaked at about the 12 h point during fermentation but decreased thereafter, suggesting that proteolysis was occurring. Typical yields were 60 mg periplasmic GFP per liter culture. The cells over‐expressed the tat operon throughout the fermentation process and the Tat system was shown to be highly active over a 48 h induction period. Fed‐batch fermentation generated much greater yields: using glycerol feed rates of 0.4, 0.8, and 1.2 mL h^?1, the cultures reached OD₆₀₀ values of 180 and periplasmic GFP levels of 0.4, 0.85, and 1.1 g L^?1 culture, respectively. Most or all of the periplasmic GFP was shown to be active. These export values are in line with those obtained in industrial production processes using Sec‐dependent export approaches. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012; 109: 2533–2542. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Export pathway selectivity of Escherichia coli twin arginine translocation signal peptides

The Escherichia coli genome encodes at least 29 putative signal peptides containing a twin arginine motif characteristic of proteins exported via the twin arginine translocation (Tat) pathway. Fusions of the putative Tat signal peptides plus six to eight amino acids of the mature proteins to three reporter proteins (short-lived green fluorescent protein, maltose-binding protein (MBP), and alkaline phosphatase) and also data from the cell localization of epitope-tagged full-length proteins were employed to determine the ability of the 29 signal peptides to direct export through the Tat pathway, through the general secretory pathway (Sec), or through both. 27/29 putative signal peptides could export one or more reporter proteins through Tat. Of these, 11 signal peptides displayed Tat specificity in that they could not direct the export of Sec-only reporter proteins. The rest (16/27) were promiscuous and were capable of directing export of the appropriate reporter either via Tat (green fluorescent protein, MBP) or via Sec (PhoA, MBP). Mutations that conferred a >or=+1 charge to the N terminus of the mature protein abolished or drastically reduced routing through the Sec pathway without affecting the ability to export via the Tat pathway. These experiments demonstrate that the charge of the mature protein N terminus affects export promiscuity, independent of the effect of the folding state of the mature protein.     

Subcellular sites for bacterial protein export

Most bacterial proteins destined to leave the cytoplasm are exported to extracellular compartments or imported into the cytoplasmic membrane via the highly conserved SecA‐YEG pathway. In the present studies, the subcellular distributions of core components of this pathway, SecA and SecY, and of the secretory protein pre‐AmyQ, were analysed using green fluorescent protein fusions, immunostaining and/or immunogold labelling techniques. It is shown that SecA, SecY and (pre‐)AmyQ are located at specific sites near and/or in the cytoplasmic membrane of Bacillus subtilis. The localization patterns of these proteins suggest that the Sec machinery is organized in spiral‐like structures along the cell, with most of the translocases organized in specific clusters along these structures. However, this localization appears to be independent of the helicoidal structures formed by the actin‐like cytoskeletal proteins, MreB or Mbl. Interestingly, the specific localization of SecA is dynamic, and depends on active translation. Moreover, reducing the phosphatidylglycerol phospholipids content in the bacterial membrane results in delocalization of SecA, suggesting the involvement of membrane phospholipids in the localization process. These data show for the first time that, in contrast to the recently reported uni‐ExPortal site in the coccoïd Streptococcus pyogenes, multiple sites dedicated to protein export are present in the cytoplasmic membrane of rod‐shaped B. subtilis.     

Contribution of SecDF to <Emphasis Type="Italic">Staphylococcus aureus</Emphasis>resistance and expression of virulence factors

Background  

SecDF is an accessory factor of the conserved Sec protein translocation machinery and belongs to the resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) family of multidrug exporters. SecDF has been shown in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis to be involved in the export of proteins. RND proteins can mediate resistance against various substances and might be of relevance in antimicrobial therapy. The role of RND proteins in Staphylococcus aureus has not yet been determined.     

Specificity of signal peptide recognition in tat-dependent bacterial protein translocation

The bacterial twin arginine translocation (Tat) pathway translocates across the cytoplasmic membrane folded proteins which, in most cases, contain a tightly bound cofactor. Specific amino-terminal signal peptides that exhibit a conserved amino acid consensus motif, S/T-R-R-X-F-L-K, direct these proteins to the Tat translocon. The glucose-fructose oxidoreductase (GFOR) of Zymomonas mobilis is a periplasmic enzyme with tightly bound NADP as a cofactor. It is synthesized as a cytoplasmic precursor with an amino-terminal signal peptide that shows all of the characteristics of a typical twin arginine signal peptide. However, GFOR is not exported to the periplasm when expressed in the heterologous host Escherichia coli, and enzymatically active pre-GFOR is found in the cytoplasm. A precise replacement of the pre-GFOR signal peptide by an authentic E. coli Tat signal peptide, which is derived from pre-trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) reductase (TorA), allowed export of GFOR, together with its bound cofactor, to the E. coli periplasm. This export was inhibited by carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone, but not by sodium azide, and was blocked in E. coli tatC and tatAE mutant strains, showing that membrane translocation of the TorA-GFOR fusion protein occurred via the Tat pathway and not via the Sec pathway. Furthermore, tight cofactor binding (and therefore correct folding) was found to be a prerequisite for proper translocation of the fusion protein. These results strongly suggest that Tat signal peptides are not universally recognized by different Tat translocases, implying that the signal peptides of Tat-dependent precursor proteins are optimally adapted only to their cognate export apparatus. Such a situation is in marked contrast to the situation that is known to exist for Sec-dependent protein translocation.     

Versatile signal peptide of Flavobacterium‐originated organophosphorus hydrolase for efficient periplasmic translocation of heterologous proteins in Escherichia coli

Organophosphorus hydrolase (OPH) from Flavobacterium species is a membrane‐associated homodimeric metalloenzyme and has its own signal peptide in its N‐terminus. We found that OPH was translocated into the periplasmic space when the original signal peptide‐containing OPH was expressed in recombinant Escherichia coli even though its translocation efficiency was relatively low. To investigate the usability of this OPH signal peptide for periplasmic expression of heterologous proteins in an E. coli system, we employed green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a cytoplasmic folding reporter and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) as a periplasmic folding reporter. We found that the OPH signal peptide was able to use both twin‐arginine translocation (Tat) and general secretory (Sec) machineries by switching translocation pathways according to the nature of target proteins in E. coli. These results might be due to the lack of Sec‐avoidance sequence in the c‐region and a moderate hydrophobicity of the OPH signal peptide. Interestingly, the OPH signal peptide considerably enhanced the translocation efficiencies for both GFP and ALP compared with commonly used TorA and PelB signal peptides that have Tat and Sec pathway dependences, respectively. Therefore, this OPH signal peptide could be successfully used in recombinant E. coli system for efficient periplasmic production of target protein regardless of the subcellular localization where functional folding of the protein occurs. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 32:848–854, 2016     

Influence of tat mutations on the ribose-binding protein translocation in Escherichia coli

Proteins are exported across the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane either as unfolded precursors via the Sec machinery or in folded conformation via the Tat system. The ribose-binding protein (RBP) of Escherichia coli is a Sec-pathway substrate. Intriguingly, it exhibits fast folding kinetics and its export is independent of SecB, a general chaperone protein dedicated for protein secretion. In this study, we found that the quantity of RBP was significantly reduced in the periplasm of tat mutants, which was restored by in trans expression of the tatABC genes. Pulse-chase experiments showed that significant amount of wild-type RBP was processed in a secY mutant in the presence of azide (SecA inhibitor), whereas the processing of a slow folding RBP derivative was almost completely blocked under the same conditions. These results would suggest that under the Sec-defective conditions the export of a portion of folded RBP could be rescued by the Tat system.     

Escherichia coli “TatExpress” strains super‐secrete human growth hormone into the bacterial periplasm by the Tat pathway

Numerous high‐value proteins are secreted into the Escherichia coli periplasm by the General Secretory (Sec) pathway, but Sec‐based production chassis cannot handle many potential target proteins. The Tat pathway offers a promising alternative because it transports fully folded proteins; however, yields have been too low for commercial use. To facilitate Tat export, we have engineered the TatExpress series of super‐secreting strains by introducing the strong inducible bacterial promoter, ptac , upstream of the chromosomal tatABCD operon, to drive its expression in E. coli strains commonly used by industry (e.g., W3110 and BL21). This modification significantly improves the Tat‐dependent secretion of human growth hormone (hGH) into the bacterial periplasm, to the extent that secreted hGH is the dominant periplasmic protein after only 1 hr induction. TatExpress strains accumulate in excess of 30 mg L^?1 periplasmic recombinant hGH, even in shake flask cultures. A second target protein, an scFv, is also shown to be exported at much higher rates in TatExpress strains.

     

A scFv antibody mutant isolated in a genetic screen for improved export via the twin arginine transporter pathway exhibits faster folding

Proteins destined for export across the cytoplasmic membrane via the post-translational Sec-dependent route have to be maintained in a largely unfolded state within the cytoplasm. In sharp contrast, only proteins that have folded into a native-like state within the cytoplasm are competent for export via the twin arginine translocation (Tat) pathway. Proteins that contain disulfide bonds, such as scFv antibody fragments, can be translocated via Tat only when expressed in Escherichia coli trxB gor mutant strains having an oxidizing cytoplasm. However, export is poor with the majority of the protein accumulating in the cytoplasm and only a fraction exported to the periplasmic space. Using a high throughput fluorescence screen, we isolated a mutant of the anti-digoxin 26-10 scFv from a large library of random mutants that is exported with a higher yield into the periplasm. In vitro refolding experiments revealed that the mutant scFv exhibits a 250% increase in the rate constant of the critical second phase of folding. This result suggests that Tat export competence is related to the protein folding rate and could be exploited for the isolation of faster folding protein mutants.     

Suppressor Analysis Reveals a Role for SecY in the SecA2-Dependent Protein Export Pathway of Mycobacteria

All bacteria use the conserved Sec pathway to transport proteins across the cytoplasmic membrane, with the SecA ATPase playing a central role in the process. Mycobacteria are part of a small group of bacteria that have two SecA proteins: the canonical SecA (SecA1) and a second, specialized SecA (SecA2). The SecA2-dependent pathway exports a small subset of proteins and is required for Mycobacterium tuberculosis virulence. The mechanism by which SecA2 drives export of proteins across the cytoplasmic membrane remains poorly understood. Here we performed suppressor analysis on a dominant negative secA2 mutant (secA2 K129R) of the model mycobacterium Mycobacterium smegmatis to better understand the pathway used by SecA2 to export proteins. Two extragenic suppressor mutations were identified as mapping to the promoter region of secY, which encodes the central component of the canonical Sec export channel. These suppressor mutations increased secY expression, and this effect was sufficient to alleviate the secA2 K129R phenotype. We also discovered that the level of SecY protein was greatly diminished in the secA2 K129R mutant, but at least partially restored in the suppressors. Furthermore, the level of SecY in a suppressor strongly correlated with the degree of suppression. Our findings reveal a detrimental effect of SecA2 K129R on SecY, arguing for an integrated system in which SecA2 works with SecY and the canonical Sec translocase to export proteins.     

Degradation of Extracytoplasmic Catalysts for Protein Folding in Bacillus subtilis

The general protein secretion pathway of Bacillus subtilis has a high capacity for protein export from the cytoplasm, which is exploited in the biotechnological production of a wide range of enzymes. These exported proteins pass the membrane in an unfolded state, and accordingly, they have to fold into their active and protease-resistant conformations once membrane passage is completed. The lipoprotein PrsA and the membrane proteins HtrA and HtrB facilitate the extracytoplasmic folding and quality control of exported proteins. Among the native exported proteins of B. subtilis are at least 10 proteases that have previously been implicated in the degradation of heterologous secreted proteins. Recently, we have shown that these proteases also degrade many native membrane proteins, lipoproteins, and secreted proteins. The present studies were therefore aimed at assessing to what extent these proteases also degrade extracytoplasmic catalysts for protein folding. To this end, we employed a collection of markerless protease mutant strains that lack up to 10 different extracytoplasmic proteases. The results show that PrsA, HtrA, and HtrB are indeed substrates of multiple extracytoplasmic proteases. Thus, improved protein secretion by multiple-protease-mutant strains may be related to both reduced proteolysis and improved posttranslocational protein folding and quality control.     

Proteasome 19S RP Binding to the Sec61 Channel Plays a Key Role in ERAD

Import of secretory proteins into the Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) is an established function of the Sec61 channel. The contribution of the Sec61 channel to export of misfolded proteins from the ER for degradation by proteasomes is still controversial, but the proteasome 19S regulatory particle (RP) is necessary and sufficient for extraction of specific misfolded proteins from the ER, and binds directly to the Sec61 channel. In this work we have identified an import-competent sec61 mutant, S353C, carrying a point mutation in ER-lumenal loop 7 which reduces affinity of the cytoplasmic face of the Sec61 channel for the 19S RP. This indicates that the interaction between the 19S RP and the Sec61 channel is dependent on conformational changes in Sec61p hinging on loop 7. The sec61-S353C mutant had no measurable ER import defects and did not cause ER stress in intact cells, but reduced ER-export of a 19S RP-dependent misfolded protein when proteasomes were limiting in a cell-free assay. Our data suggest that the interaction between the 19S RP and the Sec61 channel is essential for the export of specific substrates from the ER to the cytosol for proteasomal degradation.     

A thiol‐disulfide oxidoreductase of the Gram‐positive pathogen Corynebacterium diphtheriae is essential for viability,pilus assembly,toxin production and virulence

The Gram‐positive pathogen Corynebacterium diphtheriae exports through the Sec apparatus many extracellular proteins that include the key virulence factors diphtheria toxin and the adhesive pili. How these proteins attain their native conformations after translocation as unfolded precursors remains elusive. The fact that the majority of these exported proteins contain multiple cysteine residues and that several membrane‐bound oxidoreductases are encoded in the corynebacterial genome suggests the existence of an oxidative protein‐folding pathway in this organism. Here we show that the shaft pilin SpaA harbors a disulfide bond in vivo and alanine substitution of these cysteines abrogates SpaA polymerization and leads to the secretion of degraded SpaA peptides. We then identified a thiol‐disulfide oxidoreductase (MdbA), whose structure exhibits a conserved thioredoxin‐like domain with a CPHC active site. Remarkably, deletion of mdbA results in a severe temperature‐sensitive cell division phenotype. This mutant also fails to assemble pilus structures and is greatly defective in toxin production. Consistent with these defects, the ΔmdbA mutant is attenuated in a guinea pig model of diphtheritic toxemia. Given its diverse cellular functions in cell division, pilus assembly and toxin production, we propose that MdbA is a component of the general oxidative folding machine in C. diphtheriae.     

Identification of a Post-targeting Step Required for Efficient Cotranslational Translocation of Proteins across the Escherichia coli Inner Membrane

Recent studies have shown that cytoplasmic proteins are exported efficiently in Escherichia coli only if they are attached to signal peptides that are recognized by the signal recognition particle and are thereby targeted to the SecYEG complex cotranslationally. The evidence suggests that the entry of these proteins into the secretory pathway at an early stage of translation is necessary to prevent them from folding into a translocation-incompetent conformation. We found, however, that several glycolytic enzymes attached to signal peptides that are recognized by the signal recognition particle were exported inefficiently. Based on previous studies of post-translational export, we hypothesized that the export block was due to the presence of basic residues at the extreme N terminus of each enzyme. Consistent with our hypothesis, we found that the introduction of negatively charged residues into this segment increased the efficiency of export. Export efficiency was sensitive to the number, position, and sequence context of charged residues. The importance of charge for efficient export was underscored by an in silico analysis that revealed a conserved negative charge bias at the N terminus of the mature region of bacterial presecretory proteins. Our results demonstrate that cotranslational targeting of a protein to the E. coli SecYEG complex does not ensure its export but that export also depends on a subsequent event (most likely the initiation of translocation) that involves sequences both within and just beyond the signal peptide.Since the “signal hypothesis” was proposed over 30 years ago (1), it has become clear that signal sequences are not simply generic hydrophobic peptides that earmark proteins for secretion. In bacteria, the features of a signal peptide determine the mechanism by which a given presecretory protein is targeted to the SecYEG translocation complex in the inner membrane (IM).² Whereas most or all signal peptides are recognized by the signal recognition particle (SRP) in mammalian cells, only a small fraction of Escherichia coli signal peptides are recognized by SRP. These signal peptides are typically extremely hydrophobic (2, 3), but SRP apparently can also recognize slightly less hydrophobic signal peptides that contain a highly basic N terminus (4). SRP recognizes signal peptides as they emerge from translating ribosomes and then targets ribosome-nascent chain complexes to the IM cotranslationally (5). The binding of SRP to its receptor (FtsY), which interacts with the SecYEG complex (6), leads to the release of the nascent chain in the immediate vicinity of the translocation machinery. By targeting nascent polypeptides to the SecYEG complex at an early stage of translation, SRP prevents its substrates from folding into a conformation that is incompatible with translocation through the narrow channel formed by the SecYEG complex (7). Because most signal peptides are not recognized by E. coli SRP, the majority of presecretory proteins are fully synthesized and targeted post-translationally to the IM. These proteins are maintained in a translocation-competent conformation by molecular chaperones such as SecB that keep them unfolded (or loosely folded) (8). Signal peptides themselves also appear to play a role in maintaining translocation competence (9, 10). After mediating the targeting reaction, signal peptides likely play a role in gating open the SecYEG complex to initiate translocation.Interestingly, although signal sequences are the most salient feature of presecretory proteins, they are neither completely necessary nor sufficient to mediate protein export in E. coli (11–13). A version of alkaline phosphatase that lacks a signal peptide is still exported, albeit very inefficiently (11). The export of the leaderless protein, unlike the export of wild-type alkaline phosphatase, is strictly dependent on SecB (11). Conversely, the attachment of signal peptides to cytoplasmic proteins often does not promote their export (14). In light of evidence that folding and export are competing events, these observations led to the proposal that exported proteins tend to fold slowly (or are prevented from folding by chaperones) and therefore remain translocation-competent even without a signal peptide, whereas cytoplasmic proteins fold rapidly into a conformation that is incompatible with export. Recent studies that used thioredoxin as a model protein have validated this hypothesis. Whereas the wild-type protein attached to a typical signal peptide remained trapped in the cytoplasm, four of five slow folding mutants were exported efficiently (15). Furthermore, attachment of a signal peptide that is recognized by SRP to thioredoxin led to efficient export (16). This idea was further confirmed by a report in which various DARPins (designed ankyrin Repeat proteins) were attached to different signal peptides. Most of the DARPins were exported efficiently when they were fused to signal peptides that mediate cotranslational targeting but remained in the cytoplasm when they were attached to signal peptides that are bypassed by SRP (17).Despite these observations, there are several lines of evidence suggesting that export efficiency is not simply dictated by the ability of a protein to reach the SecYEG complex before folding into a translocation-incompetent conformation. For reasons that are unclear, some DARPins are secreted inefficiently even when they are routed into the SRP pathway (17). In addition, numerous reports have indicated that the amino acid composition of the segment of post-translationally targeted presecretory proteins that lies just beyond the signal peptide cleavage site has a dramatic effect on export efficiency. Statistical analysis has shown that the first ∼5–15 residues of the mature region of most presecretory proteins produced by Gram-negative bacteria is neutral or has a net negative charge (18). Consistent with the observed sequence bias, the presence of multiple basic residues at the N terminus of the mature region often leads to accumulation of the secretory precursor, whereas conversion of the basic residues to acidic residues restores export (19–22). Because different combinations of proteins and signal peptides were used in these studies, the exact number and location of charged residues that impinge on the efficiency of export is unclear. In any case, the effect of the net charge in the region distal to the signal peptide on protein export has never been explained. Although basic residues might conceivably promote premature folding of presecretory proteins or block the cleavage of signal peptides by leader peptidase, it is also possible that they inhibit an uncharacterized post-targeting event. Even if effects on signal peptide cleavage could have been ruled out in the aforementioned studies, however, it would not have been possible to distinguish between effects on protein folding and effects on a hypothetical post-targeting step because only proteins that are targeted post-translationally were monitored.To gain further insight into the factors that govern the efficiency of protein export, we sought an explanation for the observation that the cotranslational targeting of at least some cytoplasmic proteins is insufficient to guarantee their translocation across the IM. We found that the export of several different endogenous E. coli cytoplasmic proteins required not only the attachment of a signal peptide that is recognized by SRP but also a net negative charge just past the signal peptide cleavage site. Taken together with previous results, our data show that the charge of the segment just beyond the signal peptide influences export efficiency irrespective of the mechanism by which a protein is targeted to the IM. Because proteins that are targeted cotranslationally reach the IM before they have a chance to fold, our results imply the existence of a post-targeting step (most likely the initiation of translocation) that is facilitated by acidic residues distal to the signal peptide and inhibited or delayed by basic residues. These results help to resolve a long-standing puzzle about the influence of the mature region of presecretory proteins on protein export and have significant implications for optimizing the export of cytosolic and heterologous proteins in E. coli.     

The superoxide dismutase SodA is targeted to the periplasm in a SecA-dependent manner by a novel mechanism

The manganese/iron-type superoxide dismutase (SodA) of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae 3841 is exported to the periplasm of R. l. bv. viciae and Escherichia coli. However, it does not possess a hydrophobic cleaved N-terminal signal peptide typically present in soluble proteins exported by the Sec-dependent (Sec) pathway or the twin-arginine translocation (TAT) pathway. A tatC mutant of R. l. bv. viciae exported SodA to the periplasm, ruling out export of SodA as a complex with a TAT substrate as a chaperone. The export of SodA was unaffected in a secB mutant of E. coli, but its export from R. l. bv. viciae was inhibited by azide, an inhibitor of SecA ATPase activity. A temperature-sensitive secA mutant of E. coli was strongly reduced for SodA export. The 10 N-terminal amino acid residues of SodA were sufficient to target the reporter protein alkaline phosphatase to the periplasm. Our results demonstrate the export of a protein lacking a classical signal peptide to the periplasm by a SecA-dependent, but SecB-independent targeting mechanism. Export of the R. l. bv. viciae SodA to the periplasm was not limited to the genus Rhizobium, but was also observed in other proteobacteria.     

Efficient export of prefolded,disulfide‐bonded recombinant proteins to the periplasm by the Tat pathway in Escherichia coli CyDisCo strains

Numerous high‐value therapeutic proteins are produced in Escherichia coli and exported to the periplasm, as this approach simplifies downstream processing and enables disulfide bond formation. Most recombinant proteins are exported by the Sec pathway, which transports substrates across the plasma membrane in an unfolded state. The Tat system also exports proteins to the periplasm, but transports them in a folded state. This system has attracted interest because of its tendency to transport correctly folded proteins, but this trait renders it unable to export proteins containing disulfide bonds since these are normally acquired only in the periplasm; reduced substrates tend to be recognized as incorrectly folded and rejected. In this study we have used a series of novel strains (termed CyDisCo) which oxidise disulfide bonds in the cytoplasm, and we show that these cells efficiently export a range of disulfide‐containing proteins when a Tat signal peptide is attached. These test proteins include alkaline phosphatase (PhoA), a phytase containing four disulfide bonds (AppA), an antiinterleukin 1β scFv and human growth hormone. No export of PhoA or AppA is observed in wild‐type cells lacking the CyDisCo factors. The PhoA, AppA and scFv proteins were exported in an active form by Tat in the CyDisCo strain, and mass spectrometry showed that the vast majority of the scFv protein was disulfide‐bonded and correctly processed. The evidence indicates that this combination of Tat + CyDisCo offers a novel means of exporting active, correctly folded disulfide bonded proteins to the periplasm. © 2013 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 30:281–290, 2014     

RESETing ER proteostasis: selective stress pathway hidden in the secretory route

The efficient folding of membrane and secreted proteins relies on the unfolded protein response (UPR) to buffer fluctuations in the load of misfolded proteins. Although the UPR is thought to operate on a generic manner to maintain ER proteostasis, a recent study revealed the existence of a novel mechanism to eliminate misfolded GPI‐anchored proteins via the secretory pathway, termed ‘rapid ER stress‐induced export’ (RESET) (Satpute‐Krishnan et al, 2014 ). RESET involves the export of misfolded GPI proteins to the plasma membrane for subsequent degradation by the lysosome.