A Magnetic Bead-Based Sensor for the Quantification of Multiple Prostate Cancer Biomarkers

Novel biomarker assays and upgraded analytical tools are urgently needed to accurately discriminate benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) from prostate cancer (CaP). To address this unmet clinical need, we report a piezeoelectric/magnetic bead-based assay to quantitate prostate specific antigen (PSA; free and total), prostatic acid phosphatase, carbonic anhydrase 1 (CA1), osteonectin, IL-6 soluble receptor (IL-6sr), and spondin-2. We used the sensor to measure these seven proteins in serum samples from 120 benign prostate hypertrophy patients and 100 Gleason score 6 and 7 CaP using serum samples previously collected and banked. The results were analyzed with receiver operator characteristic curve analysis. There were significant differences between BPH and CaP patients in the PSA, CA1, and spondin-2 assays. The highest AUC discrimination was achieved with a spondin-2 OR free/total PSA operation—the area under the curve was 0.84 with a p value below 10⁻⁶. Some of these data seem to contradict previous reports and highlight the importance of sample selection and proper assay building in the development of biomarker measurement schemes. This bead-based system offers important advantages in assay building including low cost, high throughput, and rapid identification of an optimal matched antibody pair.     

经直肠剪切波弹性成像技术联合血清CEA、PSA、FPSA对前列腺良恶性病变的鉴别诊断价值研究

摘要 目的：研究经直肠剪切波弹性成像技术（TRSWE）联合血清癌胚抗原（CEA）、前列腺特异性抗原（PSA）、游离前列腺特异性抗原（FPSA）对前列腺良恶性病变的鉴别诊断价值。方法：选取合肥市第二人民医院2019年1月～2022年6月收治的90例前列腺病变患者,根据病理检查分为前列腺癌组（47例）和前列腺良性病变组（43例）。对所有前列腺病变患者均行TRSWE检查,分析前列腺良恶性病变的图像差异以及弹性模量最大值（Emax）、弹性模量平均值（Emean）。检测所有前列腺病变患者的血清CEA、PSA、FPSA水平并进行对比。采用受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线分析明确Emax值、Emean值以及血清CEA、PSA、FPSA水平联合诊断前列腺良恶性病变的效能。结果：前列腺癌组Emax值、Emean值均高于前列腺良性病变组（均P＜0.05）。前列腺癌组血清CEA、PSA及FPSA水平均高于前列腺良性病变组（均P＜0.05）。经ROC曲线分析发现,Emax值、Emean值以及血清CEA、PSA、FPSA水平联合检测诊断前列腺良恶性病变的效能优于上述5项指标单独检测。结论：TRSWE联合血清CEA、PSA、FPSA对前列腺良恶性病变的鉴别诊断价值较高,可有效提升前列腺癌的检出率,可能值得临床推广应用。     

Glycotyping of prostate specific antigen

Measurement of serum levels of the prostate specific antigen (PSA) is now widely used for the diagnosis of prostate cancer and benign prostate hyperplasia. This serum marker is of value since it is derived only from the tissue of interest, but increased levels of PSA in serum do not allow a completely clear cut diagnosis of benign versus malignant changes. Since PSA is a glycoprotein with one asparagine linked oligosaccharide, and since malignant transformation often leads to an increased branching of such oligosaccharides, we initially studied the asparagine linked structures on PSA made by a cell line derived from malignant metastatic prostate tissue. We observed that unlike normal PSA, which bears only biantennary oligosaccharides, PSA from the metastatic cell line has a mixture of biantennary and triantennary oligosaccharides. Further experiments will reveal carbohydrate differences derived from the PSA from sera or, prostate tissue of normal versus prostate cancer patients, and of the utility of such carbo-hydrate differences as a possible diagnostic marker for prostate cancer.     

CA19-9及CA72-4联合检测在胰腺癌诊断中的应用价值

目的:探究联合检测血清糖类抗原(CA)19-9和CA72-4水平在胰腺癌诊断中的应用价值。方法:回顾性选取我院2016年1月～2017年12月收治的72例胰腺癌患者作为胰腺癌组,以同期住院的68例良性胰腺病患者作为良性胰腺疾病组,同时纳入67例健康体检者作为对照组。检测三组人群血清CA19-9和CA72-4水平,采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)及曲线下面积(AUC)分析评估各单项检测指标及联合检测指标对胰腺癌特异性诊断的价值。结果:胰腺癌组患者血清CA19-9和CA72-4水平分别为(137.69±25.32)U/mL和(6.96±1.25)U/mL,显著高于良性胰腺疾病组和对照组(P0.05)。血清CA19-9和CA72-4联合检测诊断胰腺癌的ROC曲线AUC高于其单独检测(P0.05),CA19-9和CA72-4的最佳临界值分别为86.94 U/m L和4.23 U/m L,此时联合检测诊断胰腺癌的敏感性为94.7%,特异性为95.2%。结论:联合检测血清CA19-9和CA72-4诊断胰腺癌的临床价值明显优于其单独检测。     

HE4、ALDH1、CD44在卵巢良恶性肿瘤鉴别诊断中的检测效能观察

摘要 目的：观察人附睾蛋白4（HE4）、乙醛脱氢酶1（ALDH1）、黏附分子CD44在卵巢良恶性肿瘤鉴别诊断中的检测效能。方法：选取2020年1月~2022年5月我院收治的100例卵巢癌患者、100例卵巢良性肿瘤患者，分为纳入恶性组与良性组，另外选取同期体检的100例健康女性作为对照组。比较三组患者血清中HE4、ALDH1及组织中CD44的表达情况，并采用受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线分析其对卵巢良恶性肿瘤的鉴别诊断价值。结果：恶性组患者的HE4、ALDH1水平及CD44阳性表达率均高于良性组与对照组（P＜0.05），良性组患者的HE4、ALDH1水平及CD44阳性表达率高于对照组（P＜0.05）。与临床分期为Ⅰ~Ⅱ期、未发生淋巴转移患者比较，临床分期为Ⅲ~Ⅳ期、发生淋巴转移的卵巢癌患者HE4、ALDH1水平及CD44阳性表达率更高（P＜0.05），Spesrman相关性分析结果显示，HE4、ALDH1水平及CD44阳性表达率均与卵巢癌患者临床分期、淋巴转移成正相关（P＜0.05）。ROC特征曲线结果显示，HE4、ALDH1、CD44鉴别卵巢良恶性肿瘤的曲线下面积（AUC）分别为0.837、0.768及0.610，采用3项指标联合（并联）鉴别卵巢良恶性肿瘤的AUC及敏感度均高于单一指标诊断（P＜0.05）。结论：卵巢恶性肿瘤患者血清中HE4、ALDH1及组织中CD44均呈现高表达，且表达水平与卵巢癌患者临床分期、淋巴转移密切相关，HE4、ALDH1联合CD44检测对卵巢良恶性肿瘤具有较高的的鉴别诊断价值。     

血清细胞角蛋白19、神经元特异性烯醇化酶及鳞状上皮细胞癌抗原在小细胞肺癌诊断及病情评估中的作用研究

摘要 目的：分析血清细胞角蛋白19（CK19）、神经元特异性烯醇化酶（NSE）及鳞状上皮细胞癌抗原（SCCA）在小细胞肺癌诊断及病情评估中的作用。方法：选择我院自2020年1月至2022年7月收治的85例小细胞肺癌患者作为观察组,另选同期的85例肺部良性疾病患者作为对照组。检测两组血清CK19、NSE、SCCA表达水平,比较两组血清CK19、NSE、SCCA表达水平及其阳性率,使用ROC曲线下面积（AUC）分析上述指标对小细胞肺癌的诊断效能,观察小细胞肺癌不同分期患者血清CK19、NSE、SCCA表达水平的差异性,分析观察组治疗前后血清CK19、NSE、SCCA表达水平的变化情况。结果：观察组血清CK19、NSE、SCCA表达水平均较对照组高（P＜0.05）;观察组血清CK19、NSE和SCCA的阳性率均较对照组高（P＜0.05）;经ROC曲线分析,血清CK19、NSE联合SCCA诊断小细胞肺癌的敏感度为91.23 %,特异度为84.67 %,AUC为0.910;在85例小细胞肺癌患者中,临床分期为局限期33例、广泛期52例;广泛期患者血清CK19、NSE、SCCA表达水平均高于局限期患者（P＜0.05）。结论：血清CK19、NSE联合SCCA诊断小细胞肺癌的效能较好,三者均与患者病情严重程度有关,有利于此病的早期诊断和病情评估,值得进一步研究应用。     

血清PSA、EGF在不同类型良性前列腺增生患者中表达意义及其与术后疾病转归的相关性分析

摘要 目的：分析血清前列腺特异抗原（PSA)、表皮生长因子（EGF)在不同类型良性前列腺增生患者中低表达意义及其与术后疾病转归的相关性。方法：选择自2020年1月至2022年12月在我院接受手术治疗的128例良性前列腺增生患者作为研究对象,根据术后病理活检结果进行分组,间质结节组（16例）、腺肌性结节组（32例）、纤维腺瘤性结节组（12例）、腺性结节组（30例）和混合结节组（38例）,其中以间质增生为主60例、以腺体增生为主68例。检测所有患者血清PSA、EGF的表达水平,以术后6个月的国际前列腺症状评分（IPSS评分）<8分判定为预后良好,分析血清PSA、EGF在预后良好组与预后不良组之间的差异性及与IPSS评分的关系。结果：血清PSA、EGF表达水平在间质结节组、腺肌性结节组、纤维腺瘤性结节组、腺性结节组和混合结节组间比较有差异（P<0.05）;以腺体增生为主的良性前列腺增生患者血清PSA、EGF表达水平均明显高于以间质增生为主的患者（P<0.05）;经ROC曲线分析,血清PSA联合EGF预测以腺体增生为主的良性前列腺增生的敏感度为86.42%,特异度为65.34%,AUC为0.930;所有患者均获得随访6个月,预后良好98例、预后不良30例;预后不良组血清PSA、EGF表达水平均明显高于预后良好组（P<0.05）;经Pearson相关性分析,良性前列腺增生患者血清PSA、EGF表达水平均与IPSS评分呈负相关（r值分别为-0.348、-0.417,P值均为0.000）。结论：血清PSA、EGF在不同病理类型良性前列腺增生患者中表达差异显著,以间质增生为主的患者,以腺体增生为主的患者血清PSA、EGF表达水平更高,两者均与术后疾病转归密切相关,值得临床予以重视。     

Expression of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in prostatic adenocarcinoma and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia

The prostatic membrane antigen (PSMA) is a protein that is expressed in the prostatic epithelium. We studied the expression of PSMA in a series of 55 patients with different stages of prostate cancer and we compared the PSMA staining in prostate cancer cells, in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and in histologically benign prostatic epithelium for the same specimen. For this purpose archival paraffin-embedded specimens were studied by immunohistochemistry with a monoclonal antibody 7E11-C5.3 against PSMA using the streptavidin-biotin method. The mean percentage of PSMA immunoreactivity was 56.67% in prostate cancer (CaP) cells, and 48.6% in PIN cells, which was significantly higher than benign-appearing prostatic epithelium (5.72%) (for each pair, p<0.001). PSMA expression was greater in CaP with a higher Gleason score (p=0.01), but no relationship was found with serum PSA value. We conclude that PSMA overexpression is detected in high-grade PIN and is associated with a higher Gleason score of prostate cancer. It is a potential marker for studying carcinogenesis and progression of prostate cancer.     

Are plasma insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) useful markers of prostate cancer?

Increased concentrations of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and decreased insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) in serum have been proposed as markers of prostate cancer (CaP). The evidence for this, however, is contradictory. We assayed serum for IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in patients with CaP and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and in healthy controls (HC). The mean +/- SD concentration of IGF-I in CaP (98.3 +/- 39.3 ng/mL; n = 15) was lower than in BPH (119 +/- 31.1 ng/mL; n=24) and HC (119 +/- 36.1 ng/mL; n=46), but the differences between the three groups were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The mean IGFBP-3 concentrations in CaP (2691 +/- 1105 ng/mL; n = 16; p = 0.029) and BPH (2618 +/- 816 ng/mL; n = 26; p = 0.006) patients were significantly lower than that of the HC (3119 +/- 618 ng/mL; n=59), but the difference between the two groups of patients was not significant (p > 0.05). PSA concentrations in CaP (median = 80.8 ng/mL; n = 25) were significantly higher than those in BPH (median = 8.6 ng/mL; n = 39) (p < 0.001). Ninety-six percent of CaP and 72% of BPH patients had PSA concentrations >4.0 ng/mL; the proportions of patients with concentrations exceeding 20 ng/mL were 76% and 10%, respectively. We conclude that IGF-I and IGFBP-3 are inferior to PSA for CaP detection.     

CEA和CYFRA21-1在原发性肺癌诊断中的应用价值分析

目的:评价血清癌胚抗原(carcinoembryonic antigen,CEA)和细胞角蛋白19的片段(CYFRA21-1)水平对原发性肺癌的诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析2012年5月~2013年5月我科收治的329例肺癌患者和192例肺部良性病变患者的临床资料。结果:肺癌患者血清CEA或CYFRA21-1水平随着肺癌的分期呈现逐渐上升的趋势(P0.001,P0.01)。以血清CEA≥3.4μg/L作为诊断条件诊断肺癌的灵敏度、特异度和阳性预计值预计值分别为67%、62%和75.2%;以血清CYFRA-21≥5.0 ug/L作为诊断条件诊断原发性肺癌的灵敏度、特异度和阳性预计值预计值分别为48%、87%和86.3%;以血清CEA≥3.4 ug/L和CYFRA-21≥5.0 ug/L共同作为诊断条件推断原发性肺癌的灵敏度、特异度和阳性预计值预计值分别为48%、87%和86.3%;良性肺部疾病患者中血清CEA和CYFRA-21水平同时升高者只有2%。结论:血清CEA≥3.4 ug/L和CYFRA-21≥5.0 ug/L同时升高对肺癌有具有重要的诊断价值,可有效的鉴别原发性肺癌与其它良性病变。     

BMI1, Stem Cell Factor Acting as Novel Serum-biomarker for Caucasian and African-American Prostate Cancer

Background

Lack of reliable predictive biomarkers is a stumbling block in the management of prostate cancer (CaP). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) widely used in clinics has several caveats as a CaP biomarker. African-American CaP patients have poor prognosis than Caucasians, and notably the serum-PSA does not perform well in this group. Further, some men with low serum-PSA remain unnoticed for CaP until they develop disease. Thus, there is a need to identify a reliable diagnostic and predictive biomarker of CaP. Here, we show that BMI1 stem-cell protein is secretory and could be explored for biomarker use in CaP patients.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Semi-quantitative analysis of BMI1 was performed in prostatic tissues of TRAMP (autochthonous transgenic mouse model), human CaP patients, and in cell-based models representing normal and different CaP phenotypes in African-American and Caucasian men, by employing immunohistochemistry, immunoblotting and Slot-blotting. Quantitative analysis of BMI1 and PSA were performed in blood and culture-media of siRNA-transfected and non-transfected cells by employing ELISA. BMI1 protein is (i) secreted by CaP cells, (ii) increased in the apical region of epithelial cells and stromal region in prostatic tumors, and (iii) detected in human blood. BMI1 is detectable in blood of CaP patients in an order of increasing tumor stage, exhibit a positive correlation with serum-PSA and importantly is detectable in patients which exhibit low serum-PSA. The clinical significance of BMI1 as a biomarker could be ascertained from observation that CaP cells secrete this protein in higher levels than cells representative of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Conclusions/Significance

BMI1 could be developed as a dual bio-marker (serum and biopsy) for the diagnosis and prognosis of CaP in Caucasian and African-American men. Though compelling these data warrant further investigation in a cohort of African-American patients.     

超声造影定量参数联合血清TSH、Tg、外周血NLR在甲状腺结节良恶性诊断中的应用价值

摘要 目的：探讨超声造影定量参数联合血清促甲状腺激素（TSH）、甲状腺球蛋白（Tg）、外周血中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值（NLR）在甲状腺结节良恶性诊断中的应用价值。方法：选取2020年7月到2022年5月我院收治的80例甲状腺结节患者,根据病理学检查结果将其分为良性组(53例）和恶性组（27例）。所有甲状腺结节患者均行甲状腺超声造影并记录定量参数,检测血清TSH、Tg水平,计算NLR。以术后病理结果为准,采用受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线分析超声造影定量参数、血清TSH、Tg及NLR鉴别诊断甲状腺良恶性结节的价值。结果：经组织病理学确诊恶性甲状腺结节27例,良性甲状腺结节53例。恶性组超声造影定量参数平均渡越时间(mTT)、曲线下面积（AUCceus）低于良性组（P＜0.05）,血清TSH、Tg水平及NLR均高于良性组（P＜0.05）。超声造影定量参数mTT、AUCceus联合血清TSH、Tg及NLR鉴别诊断良恶性甲状腺结节的曲线下面积高于以上五项指标单独诊断。结论：恶性甲状腺结节患者超声造影定量参数mTT、AUCceus降低,且血清TSH、Tg水平及NLR增高,超声造影定量参数mTT、AUCceus联合血清TSH、Tg及NLR可提高鉴别诊断良恶性甲状腺结节的效能。     

CYFRA21-1、MMP-3及CEA 和细胞学联合检查对恶性胸腔积液的诊断价值分析

摘要 目的：探讨细胞角蛋白19片段（CYFRA21-1）、基质金属蛋白酶-3（MMP-3）及癌胚抗原（CEA） 和细胞学联合检查对恶性胸腔积液的诊断价值。方法：选择2020年1月至2023年1月我院接诊的100例胸腔积液患者进行研究,并根据病理结果分为实验组47例（病理检查结果恶性）,对照组53例（病理检查结果良性）,分析血清CYFRA21-1、MMP-3及CEA 和细胞学水平变化情况及其的诊断价值。结果：实验组患者血清血清CYFRA21-1、MMP-3及CEA水平显著高于对照组,差异显著（P＜0.05）;实验组患者CYFRA21-1、MMP-3及CEA 和细胞学阳性率均显著高于对照组,差异显著（P＜0.05）;CYFRA21-1诊断恶性胸腔积液的AUC为0.989,95%CI为0.977~1.000;MMP-3诊断恶性胸腔积液的AUC为0.979,95%CI为0.964~0.994;CEA 诊断恶性胸腔积液的AUC为0.982,95%CI为0.967~0.997;细胞学诊断恶性胸腔积液的AUC为0.823,95%CI为0.766~0.879,联合检测时AUC为0.995,95%CI为0.990~1.000,较单独检测曲线下面积比较显著差异;且特异度、准确度均较单独检测更高。结论：CYFRA21-1、MMP-3及CEA 和细胞学联合检查可有效提高诊断恶性胸腔积液的准确性,临床应用价值高。     

Combining biomarkers to detect disease with application to prostate cancer

In early detection of disease, combinations of biomarkers promise improved discrimination over diagnostic tests based on single markers. An example of this is in prostate cancer screening, where additional markers have been sought to improve the specificity of the conventional Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) test. A marker of particular interest is the percent free PSA. Studies evaluating the benefits of percent free PSA reflect the need for a methodological approach that is statistically valid and useful in the clinical setting. This article presents methods that address this need. We focus on and-or combinations of biomarker results that we call logic rules and present novel definitions for the ROC curve and the area under the curve (AUC) that are applicable to this class of combination tests. Our estimates of the ROC and AUC are amenable to statistical inference including comparisons of tests and regression analysis. The methods are applied to data on free and total PSA levels among prostate cancer cases and matched controls enrolled in the Physicians' Health Study.     

Cellular distribution of Glut-1 and Glut-5 in benign and malignant human prostate tissue

Over-expression of hexose transporters (Gluts), specifically Glut-1, is a common event in human malignancies. In prostate cancer (CaP), however, expression of Gluts has been characterized poorly. In this study, expression and distribution of Glut-1 and Glut-5 proteins were characterized using immunohistochemistry in 76 specimens of benign prostate, 10 specimens of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), and 28 specimens of CaP. In addition, mRNA expression of Glut-2, Glut-7, Glut-9, and Glut-11 was analyzed in a set of five specimens of benign prostate and CaP. In benign prostate, Glut-1 localized to the basal cells and to the basolateral membrane of secretory/luminal epithelial cells. Glut-5, however, localized to the apical membrane of secretory/luminal epithelial cells. In HGPIN, Glut-1 was immunohistochemically undetectable. Glut-5, however, localized to the apical membrane of the neoplastic epithelial cells. In CaP, Glut-1 and Glut-5, were immunohistochemically undetectable. However, over-expression of GLUT1 was observed in some specimens of highly proliferative intraductal CaP. Glut-7, Glut-9, and Glut-11 mRNAs were detected in benign prostate and CaP, however, only Glut-11 mRNA was consistently up-regulated in CaP compared to benign prostate. Low levels of expression of Glut-1 protein in the majority of CaP could explain, at least in part, the limited clinical applicability of positron emission tomography using 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose for imaging CaP. Moreover, expression of Glut-5 in HGPIN suggested that fructose could be utilized as potential metabolic substrate in HGPIN. Understanding the molecular mechanisms involved in regulation/dysregulation of Gluts in CaP could provide insight in the understanding of hexose metabolism in CaP.