Actin-Binding Proteins Implicated in the Formation of the Punctate Actin Foci Stimulated by the Self-Incompatibility Response in Papaver

The actin cytoskeleton is a key target for signaling networks and plays a central role in translating signals into cellular responses in eukaryotic cells. Self-incompatibility (SI) is an important mechanism responsible for preventing self-fertilization. The SI system of Papaver rhoeas pollen involves a Ca²⁺-dependent signaling network, including massive actin depolymerization as one of the earliest cellular responses, followed by the formation of large actin foci. However, no analysis of these structures, which appear to be aggregates of filamentous (F-)actin based on phalloidin staining, has been carried out to date. Here, we characterize and quantify the formation of F-actin foci in incompatible Papaver pollen tubes over time. The F-actin foci increase in size over time, and we provide evidence that their formation requires actin polymerization. Once formed, these SI-induced structures are unusually stable, being resistant to treatments with latrunculin B. Furthermore, their formation is associated with changes in the intracellular localization of two actin-binding proteins, cyclase-associated protein and actin-depolymerizing factor. Two other regulators of actin dynamics, profilin and fimbrin, do not associate with the F-actin foci. This study provides, to our knowledge, the first insights into the actin-binding proteins and mechanisms involved in the formation of these intriguing structures, which appear to be actively formed during the SI response.The ability to perceive and integrate signals into networks is essential for all eukaryotic cells. The actin cytoskeleton is a major target and integrator of signaling networks in eukaryotic cells. In plants, many extracellular stimuli lead to rapid structural changes in the actin cytoskeleton (Staiger, 2000; Hussey et al., 2006). Although many of the signaling intermediates that regulate actin dynamics are well defined in animal cells and yeast (Iden and Collard, 2008; Thomas et al., 2009), considerably less is known for plants. However, it is generally accepted that actin-binding proteins (ABPs) function as transducers of cellular stimuli into changes in cellular architecture (Hussey et al., 2006; Staiger and Blanchoin, 2006; Thomas et al., 2009). This includes three abundant monomer-binding proteins, profilin, actin-depolymerizing factor (ADF), and cyclase-associated protein (CAP), which function synergistically to stimulate actin turnover in vitro (Chaudhry et al., 2007). Bundling and cross-linking proteins, such as fimbrin, function to stabilize actin filaments into higher order structures (Kovar et al., 2000b; Thomas et al., 2009). These and other regulators of actin turnover are likely targets for signal-mediated changes in actin architecture in response to biotic and abiotic stresses.Self-incompatibility (SI) is a genetically controlled system to prevent self-fertilization in flowering plants. SI is controlled by a multiallelic S-locus; S-specific pollen rejection results from the interaction of pollen S- and pistil S-determinants that have matching alleles (Franklin-Tong, 2008). In Papaver rhoeas, the pistil S-determinants (previously called S proteins, recently renamed PrsS; Foote et al., 1994; Wheeler et al., 2009) act as ligands, interacting with the pollen S-determinant PrpS (Wheeler et al., 2009), triggering increases in calcium influx and increases in cytosol-free calcium in incompatible pollen (Franklin-Tong et al., 1993, 1997, 2002). The Ca²⁺-mediated signaling network results in rapid inhibition of incompatible pollen tube growth and triggers programmed cell death (PCD) involving several caspase-like activities (Thomas and Franklin-Tong, 2004; Bosch and Franklin-Tong, 2007).The SI response and the Ca²⁺-signaling pathway in Papaver stimulate rapid reorganization and massive depolymerization of actin filaments in incompatible pollen tubes (Geitmann et al., 2000; Snowman et al., 2002). Moreover, it has been demonstrated that changes in actin dynamics are necessary and sufficient for PCD initiation (Thomas et al., 2006). Intriguingly, there seems to be cross talk between actin and microtubule cytoskeletons in mediating PCD in pollen (Poulter et al., 2008). Thus, there is compelling evidence for signaling to the actin cytoskeleton in mediating PCD during SI (for a recent review, see Bosch et al., 2008). SI also triggers further changes to the actin cytoskeleton. Small F-actin foci are formed, and these increase in size within the first hour after SI stimulus and remain observable for at least 3 h (Geitmann et al., 2000; Snowman et al., 2002). These aggregates contain F-actin, as they stain with rhodamine phalloidin. The formation of the small actin foci and the larger F-actin structures occurs after cessation of pollen tube growth, so they are unlikely to play a role in pollen inhibition.Punctate F-actin foci are unusual structures, and there appears to be a paucity of examples of their formation in any eukaryotic cell type. Actin patches are associated with endocytosis in normally growing yeast (Pelham and Chang, 2001; Kaksonen et al., 2003; Ayscough, 2004; Young et al., 2004), and “actin nodules” are formed during filipodia formation in platelets (Calaminus et al., 2008). Actin bodies are formed when yeast cells enter the quiescent cycle (Sagot et al., 2006), and Hirano bodies are observed in animal cells and Dictyostelium undergoing stress or in the disease state (Hirano, 1994; Maselli et al., 2002). Large star-shaped actin arrays have been observed in pollen tubes growing in vivo (Lord, 1992), but their nature and function are unknown. When we first described the SI-induced structures, we avoided the terminology of patches or bodies, as it was not known whether they were either structurally or functionally comparable to any of these previously characterized actin-based structures.Studies on the SI-mediated actin responses to date have focused on the initial phase of depolymerization, and no analysis of what is involved in the formation of the large punctate actin foci has been made. Here, we show that the formation of punctate actin foci requires actin polymerization, but once formed they are unusually stable. Moreover, we find that their formation correlates with changes in the intracellular localization of two ABPs, CAP and ADF, but not with two other key regulators of actin dynamics, profilin and fimbrin.     

Interdependence of Endomembrane Trafficking and Actin Dynamics during Polarized Growth of Arabidopsis Pollen Tubes

During polarized growth of pollen tubes, endomembrane trafficking and actin polymerization are two critical processes that establish membrane/wall homeostasis and maintain growth polarity. Fine-tuned interactions between these two processes are therefore necessary but poorly understood. To better understand such cross talk in the model plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), we first established optimized concentrations of drugs that interfere with either endomembrane trafficking or the actin cytoskeleton, then examined pollen tube growth using fluorescent protein markers that label transport vesicles, endosomes, or the actin cytoskeleton. Both brefeldin A (BFA) and wortmannin disturbed the motility and structural integrity of ARA7- but not ARA6-labeled endosomes, suggesting heterogeneity of the endosomal populations. Disrupting endomembrane trafficking by BFA or wortmannin perturbed actin polymerization at the apical region but not in the longitudinal actin cables in the shank. The interference of BFA/wortmannin with actin polymerization was progressive rather than rapid, suggesting an indirect effect, possibly due to perturbed endomembrane trafficking of certain membrane-localized signaling proteins. Both the actin depolymerization drug latrunculin B and the actin stabilization drug jasplakinolide rapidly disrupted transport of secretory vesicles, but each drug caused distinct responses on different endosomal populations labeled by ARA6 or ARA7, indicating that a dynamic actin cytoskeleton was critical for some steps in endomembrane trafficking. Our results provide evidence of cross talk between endomembrane trafficking and the actin cytoskeleton in pollen tubes.Pollen tubes of flowering plants are specialized cells that deliver immotile sperm to the proximity of female gametes for successful reproduction (Johnson and Preuss, 2002). The growth of pollen tubes is both polar and directional (Hepler et al., 2001); many cellular activities contribute to such growth, the most important being the dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton system, targeted exocytosis, and endocytosis (Hepler et al., 2001).Pollen tubes contain longitudinal actin cables along the shank, which are important for providing structural support and acting as tracks for the movement of large organelles (Staiger et al., 1994). The apical area of pollen tubes instead contains dynamic filamentous actin (F-actin), as shown by fluorescently labeled actin-binding proteins (Kost et al., 1999; Fu et al., 2001; Chen et al., 2002; Wilsen et al., 2006). The dynamics of F-actin are critical for the polarized growth of pollen tubes. Genetically manipulating the activities of the small GTPases ROP (Kost et al., 1999; Fu et al., 2001; Cheung et al., 2008) and Rab (de Graaf et al., 2005), or of actin-binding proteins such as profilin and formin (Staiger et al., 1994; Chen et al., 2002; Cheung and Wu, 2004), disrupted F-actin dynamics and inhibited tube growth and caused apical bulges. Application of drugs such as latrunculin B (LatB) and jasplakinolide (Jas) showed similar effects (Gibbon et al., 1999; Vidali et al., 2001; Cardenas et al., 2005; Hörmanseder et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2007).Targeted exocytosis delivers building materials for cell membranes and cell walls and therefore is critical for maintaining growth polarity and directionality of growing pollen tubes (Hepler et al., 2001). Because targeted exocytosis brings more membrane and wall materials than needed to the apex of a pollen tube, an active endocytic system exists to retrieve excess secreted materials. In addition to this nonselective bulk membrane retrieval, pollen tubes may have selective and regulated endocytic trafficking pathways. For example, experiments using charged gold particles indicated the existence of two distinct endocytic pathways in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) pollen tubes (Moscatelli et al., 2007), and other studies showed that pollen tubes are able to take in materials from the extracellular matrix (Lind et al., 1996; Goldraij et al., 2006). The axis of targeted exocytosis correlated with the direction of tube growth and it asymmetrically changed toward the new apex during tube reorientation (Camacho and Malho, 2003; de Graaf et al., 2005). Disruption of membrane trafficking altered growth trajectories (de Graaf et al., 2005). Both suggest that membrane trafficking is a critical part of polarity maintenance and reorientation.As two important cellular processes in pollen tube growth, membrane trafficking and actin polymerization are conceivably dependent on each other. For example, several studies demonstrated that dynamic actin polymerization was essential for membrane trafficking (Hörmanseder et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2008), while others explored whether membrane trafficking affected actin polymerization (de Graaf et al., 2005; Hörmanseder et al., 2005). These studies, however, were mostly done with rapidly growing pollen tubes from tobacco or lily (Lilium longiflorum). For the model plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), whose pollen tubes grow slower, little is known in this regard. Given a robust protocol for Arabidopsis pollen germination (Boavida and McCormick, 2007), it is now possible to investigate the interactions between these two cellular activities.In this study, we analyzed the effects of drug treatments on Arabidopsis pollen tubes expressing fluorescent protein probes for transport vesicles, endosomes, or the actin cytoskeleton. We show that perturbing actin dynamics by LatB or Jas treatments disrupted the V-shaped distribution of transport vesicles, caused aggregation, and finally dissipation of a subpopulation of endosomes, indicating that actin dynamics are critical at some steps of endomembrane trafficking. On the other hand, disturbing endomembrane trafficking with brefeldin A (BFA) or wortmannin abolished the F-actin structure at the apical region without affecting the longitudinal actin cables at the shank. These results provide evidence that endomembrane trafficking and actin dynamics interact at certain steps during polarized growth of Arabidopsis pollen tubes.     

The Association of the Arabidopsis Actin-Related Protein2/3 Complex with Cell Membranes Is Linked to Its Assembly Status But Not Its Activation

In growing plant cells, the combined activities of the cytoskeleton, endomembrane, and cell wall biosynthetic systems organize the cytoplasm and define the architecture and growth properties of the cell. These biosynthetic machineries efficiently synthesize, deliver, and recycle the raw materials that support cell expansion. The precise roles of the actin cytoskeleton in these processes are unclear. Certainly, bundles of actin filaments position organelles and are a substrate for long-distance intracellular transport, but the functional linkages between dynamic actin filament arrays and the cell growth machinery are poorly understood. The Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) “distorted group” mutants have defined protein complexes that appear to generate and convert small GTPase signals into an Actin-Related Protein2/3 (ARP2/3)-dependent actin filament nucleation response. However, direct biochemical knowledge about Arabidopsis ARP2/3 and its cellular distribution is lacking. In this paper, we provide biochemical evidence for a plant ARP2/3. The plant complex utilizes a conserved assembly mechanism. ARPC4 is the most critical core subunit that controls the assembly and steady-state levels of the complex. ARP2/3 in other systems is believed to be mostly a soluble complex that is locally recruited and activated. Unexpectedly, we find that Arabidopsis ARP2/3 interacts strongly with cell membranes. Membrane binding is linked to complex assembly status and not to the extent to which it is activated. Mutant analyses implicate ARP2 as an important subunit for membrane association.In plant cells, the actin cytoskeleton forms an intricate network of polymers that organizes the cytoplasm and defines the long-distance intracellular trafficking patterns of the cell. The actin network is critical not only for tip-growing cells (for review, see Cole and Fowler, 2006; Lovy-Wheeler et al., 2007) but also during the coordinated cell expansion that occurs in cells that utilize a diffuse growth mechanism (for review, see Wasteneys and Galway, 2003; Smith and Oppenheimer, 2005). For example, the polarized diffuse growth of leaf trichomes is highly sensitized to actin cytoskeleton disruption (Mathur et al., 1999; Szymanski et al., 1999), and a recent analysis of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) ACTIN mutants revealed widespread cell swelling and isotropic expansion in numerous cell types in the root and shoot (Kandasamy et al., 2009). The actin network is dynamic. The array reorganizes during cell morphogenesis (Braun et al., 1999; Szymanski et al., 1999) and in response to endogenous (Lemichez et al., 2001) and external (Hardham et al., 2007) cues. A major research goal is to better understand not only how plant cells convert G-actin subunits to particular actin filament arrays but also how the actin network interacts with the cellular growth machinery during cell expansion.This is a difficult problem to solve, because in expanding vacuolated cells the actin array adopts numerous configurations and consists of dense meshworks of cortical actin filaments and bundles (Baluska et al., 2000), thick actin bundles that penetrate the central vacuole (Higaki et al., 2006), and meshworks of filaments and bundles that surround the nucleus and chloroplasts (Kandasamy and Meagher, 1999; Collings et al., 2000). The spatial relationships between these actin networks and localized cell expansion are not obvious. Certainly, the plasma membrane-cell wall interface is a critical location for the regulated delivery and fusion of vesicles containing cell wall polysaccharides. Frequent reports of localized domains of enriched cortical actin signal at regions of presumed localized cell expansion have led to the widely held view that the cortical actin array creates local tracks for vesicle-mediated secretion (for review, see Smith and Oppenheimer, 2005; Hussey et al., 2006). In one study, the dynamics of actin filaments were analyzed in living hypocotyl epidermal cells that utilize a diffuse growth mechanism (Staiger et al., 2009). In this case, individual actin filaments are very unstable and randomly oriented; therefore, the precise relationships between cortical F-actin, vesicle delivery, and cell shape change remain obscure. The best known function for the actin cytoskeleton is that of a track for myosin-dependent vesicle and organelle trafficking (Shimmen, 2007). The actin bundle network mediates the transport of cargo between endomembrane compartments (Geldner et al., 2001; Kim et al., 2005) and the long-distance actomyosin transport of a variety of organelles, including the Golgi (Nebenfuhr et al., 1999; Peremyslov et al., 2008; Prokhnevsky et al., 2008). Generation of distributed (Gutierrez et al., 2009; Timmers et al., 2009) and localized (Wightman and Turner, 2008) actin bundle networks appears to define early steps in the trafficking of Golgi-localized cellulose synthase complexes to the sites of primary and secondary wall synthesis, respectively.Plant cells employ diverse collections of G-actin-binding proteins, actin filament nucleators, and actin-bundling and cross-linking proteins to generate and remodel the F-actin network (for review, see Staiger and Blanchoin, 2006). One actin filament nucleator, termed the Actin-Related Protein2/3 (ARP2/3) complex, controls numerous aspects of plant morphogenesis and development. The vertebrate complex consists of the actin-related proteins ARP2 and ARP3 and five other unrelated proteins termed ARPC1 to ARPC5, in order of decreasing mass. ARP2/3 in isolation is inactive, but in the presence of proteins termed nucleation-promoting factors such as WAVE/SCAR (for WASP family Verprolin homologous/Suppressor of cAMP Repressor), ARP2/3 is converted into an efficient actin filament-nucleating machine (for review, see Higgs and Pollard, 2001; Welch and Mullins, 2002). In mammalian cells, ARP2/3 activities are linked to membrane dynamics. Keratocytes that crawl persistently on a solid substrate appear to use ARP2/3-generated dendritic actin filament networks at the leading edge to either drive or consolidate plasma membrane protrusion (Pollard and Borisy, 2003; Ji et al., 2008). In many vertebrate cell types, ARP2/3 has a strong punctate intracellular localization (Welch et al., 1997; Strasser et al., 2004), which could reflect hypothesized activities at the Golgi (Stamnes, 2002) or late endosomal (Fucini et al., 2002; Holtta-Vuori et al., 2005) compartment.Genetic studies in plants reveal nonessential but widespread functions for ARP2/3. In the moss Physcomitrella patens, the ARPC4 and ARPC1 subunit genes are critical during tip growth of protonemal filaments (Harries et al., 2005; Perroud and Quatrano, 2006). In Arabidopsis, loss of either ARP2/3 subunit gene or mutations in WAVE complex genes that positively regulate ARP2/3 cause complicated syndromes, including the loss of polarized diffuse growth throughout the shoot epidermis, defective cell-cell adhesion, and decreased hypocotyl elongation (for review, see Szymanski, 2005). Altered responses to exogenous Suc (Li et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2008) and reduced root elongation (Dyachok et al., 2008) are also reported for wave and arp2/3 strains. In higher plants, the involvement of ARP2/3 in tip growth and root hair development is more subtle. In Lotus japonicus, mutation of NAP1 and PIR1, known positive regulators of ARP2/3 (Basu et al., 2004; Deeks et al., 2004; El-Assal et al., 2004a), causes incompletely penetrant root hair phenotypes, but in the presence of symbiotic bacteria, the mutants have defective infection threads and reduced root nodule formation. Arabidopsis arp2/3 mutants do not have obvious tip growth defects in pollen tubes or root hairs, but in the presence of GFP:TALIN (Mathur et al., 2003b) and in double mutant combinations with the actin-binding protein CAP1 (Deeks et al., 2007), the effects of ARP2/3 on root hair growth are unmasked.In Arabidopsis, the genetics of the positive regulation of ARP2/3 are well characterized and appear to occur solely through another heteromeric complex termed WAVE (Eden et al., 2002; for review, see Szymanski, 2005). The putative WAVE/SCAR complex contains five subunits, one of which is the ARP2/3 activator SCAR. Plant SCARs contain conserved N-terminal and C-terminal domains that mediate interactions with other WAVE complex proteins and ARP2/3 activation, respectively (Frank et al., 2004; Basu et al., 2005). In nonplant systems, the regulatory relationships between WAVE and ARP2/3 appear to vary between cell types and species (for review, see Bompard and Caron, 2004; Stradal and Scita, 2006). However, in Arabidopsis, double mutant analyses indicate that WAVE is the sole pathway for ARP2/3 activation and that all subunits positively regulate ARP2/3 (Deeks et al., 2004; Basu et al., 2005; Djakovic et al., 2006). SCAR quadruple mutants are indistinguishable from arp2/3 null plants (Zhang et al., 2008). In moss, BRICK1 and ARP2/3 mutants have similar phenotypes, suggesting conserved regulatory relationships between WAVE and ARP2/3 in the plant kingdom (Harries et al., 2005; Perroud and Quatrano, 2006, 2008).Despite extensive molecular genetic knowledge about the ARP2/3 pathway and the strong actin cytoskeleton and growth phenotypes of arp2/3 plants, there are few direct data on the existence of the plant complex and its cellular function. There are reports of ARP2/3 localization based on the behavior of individual subunits (Le et al., 2003). In some cases, the results are weakened by the unknown specificity of heterologous ARP2/3 antibodies (Van Gestel et al., 2003; Fiserova et al., 2006). A specific antibody was raised against Silvetia ARP2 (Hable and Kropf, 2005). In developing zygotes, rhizhoid emergence is an early and actin-dependent developmental event, and at this stage a broad subcortical cone of ARP2 signal extends from the nuclear envelope toward the rhizhoid apex (Hable and Kropf, 2005). Double labeling experiments detected considerable overlap between ARP2 and actin, but surprisingly, there was a broad cortical domain of putative organelle-associated distal ARP2 that did not overlap with actin. In tip-growing P. patens chloronema cells, ARPC4 also appears to be membrane associated and localizes to a broad subcortical apical zone (Perroud and Quatrano, 2006). For these localization and genetic studies that rely on individual ARP2/3 subunits, it is important to prove that a plant ARP2/3 complex exists to test for an association of the complex with endomembrane compartments.In this paper, we provide several lines of evidence for an evolutionarily conserved pathway for ARP2/3 complex assembly in plant cells. These studies are based in part on genetic and biochemical analyses of the putative ARP2/3 subunit gene ARPC4. We found that disruption of the ARPC4 gene caused catastrophic disassembly of the complex and an array of phenotypes that were indistinguishable from known arp2/3 mutants. Chromatography experiments clearly revealed that functional hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged ARPC4 and endogenous ARP3 subunits assemble fully into ARP2/3 complexes. Surprisingly, much of the cellular pool of the plant ARP2/3 complex is membrane associated. An analysis of an extensive collection of wave and arp2/3 mutants allowed us to conclude that the normal association with membranes depended on the presence of ARP2 and the assembly status of the complex but not on the existence of an active pool of ARP2/3 in the cell.     

Calcineurin B-Like Protein-Interacting Protein Kinase CIPK21 Regulates Osmotic and Salt Stress Responses in Arabidopsis

The role of calcium-mediated signaling has been extensively studied in plant responses to abiotic stress signals. Calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs) and CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) constitute a complex signaling network acting in diverse plant stress responses. Osmotic stress imposed by soil salinity and drought is a major abiotic stress that impedes plant growth and development and involves calcium-signaling processes. In this study, we report the functional analysis of CIPK21, an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) CBL-interacting protein kinase, ubiquitously expressed in plant tissues and up-regulated under multiple abiotic stress conditions. The growth of a loss-of-function mutant of CIPK21, cipk21, was hypersensitive to high salt and osmotic stress conditions. The calcium sensors CBL2 and CBL3 were found to physically interact with CIPK21 and target this kinase to the tonoplast. Moreover, preferential localization of CIPK21 to the tonoplast was detected under salt stress condition when coexpressed with CBL2 or CBL3. These findings suggest that CIPK21 mediates responses to salt stress condition in Arabidopsis, at least in part, by regulating ion and water homeostasis across the vacuolar membranes.Drought and salinity cause osmotic stress in plants and severely affect crop productivity throughout the world. Plants respond to osmotic stress by changing a number of cellular processes (Xiong et al., 1999; Xiong and Zhu, 2002; Bartels and Sunkar, 2005; Boudsocq and Lauriére, 2005). Some of these changes include activation of stress-responsive genes, regulation of membrane transport at both plasma membrane (PM) and vacuolar membrane (tonoplast) to maintain water and ionic homeostasis, and metabolic changes to produce compatible osmolytes such as Pro (Stewart and Lee, 1974; Krasensky and Jonak, 2012). It has been well established that a specific calcium (Ca²⁺) signature is generated in response to a particular environmental stimulus (Trewavas and Malhó, 1998; Scrase-Field and Knight, 2003; Luan, 2009; Kudla et al., 2010). The Ca²⁺ changes are primarily perceived by several Ca²⁺ sensors such as calmodulin (Reddy, 2001; Luan et al., 2002), Ca²⁺-dependent protein kinases (Harper and Harmon, 2005), calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Pandey, 2008; Luan, 2009; Sanyal et al., 2015), and other Ca²⁺-binding proteins (Reddy, 2001; Shao et al., 2008) to initiate various cellular responses.Plant CBL-type Ca²⁺ sensors interact with and activate CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) that phosphorylate downstream components to transduce Ca²⁺ signals (Liu et al., 2000; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Luan, 2009). In several plant species, multiple members have been identified in the CBL and CIPK family (Luan et al., 2002; Kolukisaoglu et al., 2004; Pandey, 2008; Batistič and Kudla, 2009; Weinl and Kudla, 2009; Pandey et al., 2014). Involvement of specific CBL-CIPK pair to decode a particular type of signal entails the alternative and selective complex formation leading to stimulus-response coupling (D’Angelo et al., 2006; Batistič et al., 2010).Several CBL and CIPK family members have been implicated in plant responses to drought, salinity, and osmotic stress based on genetic analysis of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants (Zhu, 2002; Cheong et al., 2003, 2007; Kim et al., 2003; Pandey et al., 2004, 2008; D’Angelo et al., 2006; Qin et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Held et al., 2011; Tang et al., 2012; Drerup et al., 2013; Eckert et al., 2014). A few CIPKs have also been functionally characterized by gain-of-function approach in crop plants such as rice (Oryza sativa), pea (Pisum sativum), and maize (Zea mays) and were found to be involved in osmotic stress responses (Mahajan et al., 2006; Xiang et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2009; Cuéllar et al., 2010).In this report, we examined the role of the Arabidopsis CIPK21 gene in osmotic stress response by reverse genetic analysis. The loss-of-function mutant plants became hypersensitive to salt and mannitol stress conditions, suggesting that CIPK21 is involved in the regulation of osmotic stress response in Arabidopsis. These findings are further supported by an enhanced tonoplast targeting of the cytoplasmic CIPK21 through interaction with the vacuolar Ca²⁺ sensors CBL2 and CBL3 under salt stress condition.     

Characterization of the Possible Roles for B Class MADS Box Genes in Regulation of Perianth Formation in Orchid

To investigate sepal/petal/lip formation in Oncidium Gower Ramsey, three paleoAPETALA3 genes, O. Gower Ramsey MADS box gene5 (OMADS5; clade 1), OMADS3 (clade 2), and OMADS9 (clade 3), and one PISTILLATA gene, OMADS8, were characterized. The OMADS8 and OMADS3 mRNAs were expressed in all four floral organs as well as in vegetative leaves. The OMADS9 mRNA was only strongly detected in petals and lips. The mRNA for OMADS5 was only strongly detected in sepals and petals and was significantly down-regulated in lip-like petals and lip-like sepals of peloric mutant flowers. This result revealed a possible negative role for OMADS5 in regulating lip formation. Yeast two-hybrid analysis indicated that OMADS5 formed homodimers and heterodimers with OMADS3 and OMADS9. OMADS8 only formed heterodimers with OMADS3, whereas OMADS3 and OMADS9 formed homodimers and heterodimers with each other. We proposed that sepal/petal/lip formation needs the presence of OMADS3/8 and/or OMADS9. The determination of the final organ identity for the sepal/petal/lip likely depended on the presence or absence of OMADS5. The presence of OMADS5 caused short sepal/petal formation. When OMADS5 was absent, cells could proliferate, resulting in the possible formation of large lips and the conversion of the sepal/petal into lips in peloric mutants. Further analysis indicated that only ectopic expression of OMADS8 but not OMADS5/9 caused the conversion of the sepal into an expanded petal-like structure in transgenic Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants.The ABCDE model predicts the formation of any flower organ by the interaction of five classes of homeotic genes in plants (Yanofsky et al., 1990; Jack et al., 1992; Mandel et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994; Jofuku et al., 1994; Pelaz et al., 2000, 2001; Theißen and Saedler, 2001; Pinyopich et al., 2003; Ditta et al., 2004; Jack, 2004). The A class genes control sepal formation. The A, B, and E class genes work together to regulate petal formation. The B, C, and E class genes control stamen formation. The C and E class genes work to regulate carpel formation, whereas the D class gene is involved in ovule development. MADS box genes seem to have a central role in flower development, because most ABCDE genes encode MADS box proteins (Coen and Meyerowitz, 1991; Weigel and Meyerowitz, 1994; Purugganan et al., 1995; Rounsley et al., 1995; Theißen and Saedler, 1995; Theißen et al., 2000; Theißen, 2001).The function of B group genes, such as APETALA3 (AP3) and PISTILLATA (PI), has been thought to have a major role in specifying petal and stamen development (Jack et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994; Krizek and Meyerowitz, 1996; Kramer et al., 1998; Hernandez-Hernandez et al., 2007; Kanno et al., 2007; Whipple et al., 2007; Irish, 2009). In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), mutation in AP3 or PI caused identical phenotypes of second whorl petal conversion into a sepal structure and third flower whorl stamen into a carpel structure (Bowman et al., 1989; Jack et al., 1992; Goto and Meyerowitz, 1994). Similar homeotic conversions for petal and stamen were observed in the mutants of the AP3 and PI orthologs from a number of core eudicots such as Antirrhinum majus, Petunia hybrida, Gerbera hybrida, Solanum lycopersicum, and Nicotiana benthamiana (Sommer et al., 1990; Tröbner et al., 1992; Angenent et al., 1993; van der Krol et al., 1993; Yu et al., 1999; Liu et al., 2004; Vandenbussche et al., 2004; de Martino et al., 2006), from basal eudicot species such as Papaver somniferum and Aquilegia vulgaris (Drea et al., 2007; Kramer et al., 2007), as well as from monocot species such as Zea mays and Oryza sativa (Ambrose et al., 2000; Nagasawa et al., 2003; Prasad and Vijayraghavan, 2003; Yadav et al., 2007; Yao et al., 2008). This indicated that the function of the B class genes AP3 and PI is highly conserved during evolution.It has been thought that B group genes may have arisen from an ancestral gene through multiple gene duplication events (Doyle, 1994; Theißen et al., 1996, 2000; Purugganan, 1997; Kramer et al., 1998; Kramer and Irish, 1999; Lamb and Irish, 2003; Kim et al., 2004; Stellari et al., 2004; Zahn et al., 2005; Hernandez-Hernandez et al., 2007). In the gymnosperms, there was a single putative B class lineage that duplicated to generate the paleoAP3 and PI lineages in angiosperms (Kramer et al., 1998; Theißen et al., 2000; Irish, 2009). The paleoAP3 lineage is composed of AP3 orthologs identified in lower eudicots, magnolid dicots, and monocots (Kramer et al., 1998). Genes in this lineage contain the conserved paleoAP3- and PI-derived motifs in the C-terminal end of the proteins, which have been thought to be characteristics of the B class ancestral gene (Kramer et al., 1998; Tzeng and Yang, 2001; Hsu and Yang, 2002). The PI lineage is composed of PI orthologs that contain a highly conserved PI motif identified in most plant species (Kramer et al., 1998). Subsequently, there was a second duplication at the base of the core eudicots that produced the euAP3 and TM6 lineages, which have been subject to substantial sequence changes in eudicots during evolution (Kramer et al., 1998; Kramer and Irish, 1999). The paleoAP3 motif in the C-terminal end of the proteins was retained in the TM6 lineage and replaced by a conserved euAP3 motif in the euAP3 lineage of most eudicot species (Kramer et al., 1998). In addition, many lineage-specific duplications for paleoAP3 lineage have occurred in plants such as orchids (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009; Mondragón-Palomino et al., 2009), Ranunculaceae, and Ranunculales (Kramer et al., 2003; Di Stilio et al., 2005; Shan et al., 2006; Kramer, 2009).Unlike the A or C class MADS box proteins, which form homodimers that regulate flower development, the ability of B class proteins to form homodimers has only been reported in gymnosperms and in the paleoAP3 and PI lineages of some monocots. For example, LMADS1 of the lily Lilium longiflorum (Tzeng and Yang, 2001), OMADS3 of the orchid Oncidium Gower Ramsey (Hsu and Yang, 2002), and PeMADS4 of the orchid Phalaenopsis equestris (Tsai et al., 2004) in the paleoAP3 lineage, LRGLOA and LRGLOB of the lily Lilium regale (Winter et al., 2002), TGGLO of the tulip Tulipa gesneriana (Kanno et al., 2003), and PeMADS6 of the orchid P. equestris (Tsai et al., 2005) in the PI lineage, and GGM2 of the gymnosperm Gnetum gnemon (Winter et al., 1999) were able to form homodimers that regulate flower development. Proteins in the euAP3 lineage and in most paleoAP3 lineages were not able to form homodimers and had to interact with PI to form heterodimers in order to regulate petal and stamen development in various plant species (Schwarz-Sommer et al., 1992; Tröbner et al., 1992; Riechmann et al., 1996; Moon et al., 1999; Winter et al., 2002; Kanno et al., 2003; Vandenbussche et al., 2004; Yao et al., 2008). In addition to forming dimers, AP3 and PI were able to interact with other MADS box proteins, such as SEPALLATA1 (SEP1), SEP2, and SEP3, to regulate petal and stamen development (Pelaz et al., 2000; Honma and Goto, 2001; Theißen and Saedler, 2001; Castillejo et al., 2005).Orchids are among the most important plants in the flower market around the world, and research on MADS box genes has been reported for several species of orchids during the past few years (Lu et al., 1993, 2007; Yu and Goh, 2000; Hsu and Yang, 2002; Yu et al., 2002; Hsu et al., 2003; Tsai et al., 2004, 2008; Xu et al., 2006; Guo et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2007; Chang et al., 2009). Unlike the flowers in eudicots, the nearly identical shape of the sepals and petals as well as the production of a unique lip in orchid flowers make them a very special plant species for the study of flower development. Four clades (1–4) of genes in the paleoAP3 lineage have been identified in several orchids (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009; Mondragón-Palomino et al., 2009). Several works have described the possible interactions among these four clades of paleoAP3 genes and one PI gene that are involved in regulating the differentiation and formation of the sepal/petal/lip of orchids (Tsai et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Mondragón-Palomino and Theißen, 2008, 2009). However, the exact mechanism that involves the orchid B class genes remains unclear and needs to be clarified by more experimental investigations.O. Gower Ramsey is a popular orchid with important economic value in cut flower markets. Only a few studies have been reported on the role of MADS box genes in regulating flower formation in this plant species (Hsu and Yang, 2002; Hsu et al., 2003; Chang et al., 2009). An AP3-like MADS gene that regulates both floral formation and initiation in transgenic Arabidopsis has been reported (Hsu and Yang, 2002). In addition, four AP1/AGAMOUS-LIKE9 (AGL9)-like MADS box genes have been characterized that show novel expression patterns and cause different effects on floral transition and formation in Arabidopsis (Hsu et al., 2003; Chang et al., 2009). Compared with other orchids, the production of a large and well-expanded lip and five small identical sepals/petals makes O. Gower Ramsey a special case for the study of the diverse functions of B class MADS box genes during evolution. Therefore, the isolation of more B class MADS box genes and further study of their roles in the regulation of perianth (sepal/petal/lip) formation during O. Gower Ramsey flower development are necessary. In addition to the clade 2 paleoAP3 gene OMADS3, which was previously characterized in our laboratory (Hsu and Yang, 2002), three more B class MADS box genes, OMADS5, OMADS8, and OMADS9, were characterized from O. Gower Ramsey in this study. Based on the different expression patterns and the protein interactions among these four orchid B class genes, we propose that the presence of OMADS3/8 and/or OMADS9 is required for sepal/petal/lip formation. Further sepal and petal formation at least requires the additional presence of OMADS5, whereas large lip formation was seen when OMADS5 expression was absent. Our results provide a new finding and information pertaining to the roles for orchid B class MADS box genes in the regulation of sepal/petal/lip formation.     

Class XI Myosins Move Specific Organelles in Pollen Tubes and Are Required for Normal Fertility and Pollen Tube Growth in Arabidopsis

Pollen tube growth is an essential aspect of plant reproduction because it is the mechanism through which nonmotile sperm cells are delivered to ovules, thus allowing fertilization to occur. A pollen tube is a single cell that only grows at the tip, and this tip growth has been shown to depend on actin filaments. It is generally assumed that myosin-driven movements along these actin filaments are required to sustain the high growth rates of pollen tubes. We tested this conjecture by examining seed set, pollen fitness, and pollen tube growth for knockout mutants of five of the six myosin XI genes expressed in pollen of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). Single mutants had little or no reduction in overall fertility, whereas double mutants of highly similar pollen myosins had greater defects in pollen tube growth. In particular, myo11c1 myo11c2 pollen tubes grew more slowly than wild-type pollen tubes, which resulted in reduced fitness compared with the wild type and a drastic reduction in seed set. Golgi stack and peroxisome movements were also significantly reduced, and actin filaments were less organized in myo11c1 myo11c2 pollen tubes. Interestingly, the movement of yellow fluorescent protein-RabA4d-labeled vesicles and their accumulation at pollen tube tips were not affected in the myo11c1 myo11c2 double mutant, demonstrating functional specialization among myosin isoforms. We conclude that class XI myosins are required for organelle motility, actin organization, and optimal growth of pollen tubes.Pollen tubes play a crucial role in flowering plant reproduction. A pollen tube is the vegetative cell of the male gametophyte. It undergoes rapid polarized growth in order to transport the two nonmotile sperm cells to an ovule. This rapid growth is supported by the constant delivery of secretory vesicles to the pollen tube tip, where they fuse with the plasma membrane to enlarge the cell (Bove et al., 2008; Bou Daher and Geitmann, 2011; Chebli et al., 2013). This vesicle delivery is assumed to be driven by the rapid movement of organelles and cytosol throughout the cell, a process that is commonly referred to as cytoplasmic streaming (Shimmen, 2007). Cytoplasmic streaming in angiosperm pollen tubes forms a reverse fountain: organelles moving toward the tip travel along the cell membrane, while organelles moving away from the tip travel through the center of the tube (Heslop-Harrison and Heslop-Harrison, 1990; Derksen et al., 2002). Drug treatments revealed that pollen tube cytoplasmic streaming and tip growth depend on actin filaments (Franke et al., 1972; Mascarenhas and Lafountain, 1972; Heslop-Harrison and Heslop-Harrison, 1989; Parton et al., 2001; Vidali et al., 2001). Curiously, very low concentrations of actin polymerization inhibitors can prevent growth without completely stopping cytoplasmic streaming, indicating that cytoplasmic streaming is not sufficient for pollen tube growth (Vidali et al., 2001). At the same time, however, drug treatments have not been able to specifically inhibit cytoplasmic streaming; thus, it is unknown whether cytoplasmic streaming is necessary for pollen tube growth.Myosins are actin-based motor proteins that actively transport organelles throughout the cell and are responsible for cytoplasmic streaming in plants (Shimmen, 2007; Sparkes, 2011; Madison and Nebenführ, 2013). Myosins can be grouped into at least 30 different classes based on amino acid sequence similarity of the motor domain, of which only class VIII and class XI myosins are found in plants (Odronitz and Kollmar, 2007; Sebé-Pedrós et al., 2014). Class VIII and class XI myosins have similar domain architecture. The N-terminal motor domain binds actin and hydrolyzes ATP (Tominaga et al., 2003) and is often preceded by an SH3-like (for sarcoma homology3) domain of unknown function. The neck domain, containing IQ (Ile-Gln) motifs, acts as a lever arm and is bound by calmodulin-like proteins that mediate calcium regulation of motor activity (Kinkema and Schiefelbein, 1994; Yokota et al., 1999; Tominaga et al., 2012). The coiled-coil domain facilitates dimerization (Li and Nebenführ, 2008), and the globular tail functions as the cargo-binding domain (Li and Nebenführ, 2007). Class VIII myosins also contain an N-terminal extension, MyTH8 (for myosin tail homology8; Mühlhausen and Kollmar, 2013), and class XI myosins contain a dilute domain in the C-terminal globular tail (Kinkema and Schiefelbein, 1994; Odronitz and Kollmar, 2007; Sebé-Pedrós et al., 2014). Recently, Mühlhausen and Kollmar (2013) proposed a new nomenclature for plant myosins based on a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of all known plant myosins that clearly identifies paralogs and makes interspecies comparisons easier (Madison and Nebenführ, 2013).The localization of class VIII myosins, as determined by immunolocalization and the expression of fluorescently labeled full-length or tail constructs, has implicated these myosins in cell-to-cell communication, cell division, and endocytosis in angiosperms and moss (Reichelt et al., 1999; Van Damme et al., 2004; Avisar et al., 2008; Golomb et al., 2008; Sattarzadeh et al., 2008; Yuan et al., 2011; Haraguchi et al., 2014; Wu and Bezanilla, 2014). On the other hand, class XI myosin mutants have been studied extensively in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), which revealed roles for class XI myosins in cell expansion and organelle motility (Ojangu et al., 2007, 2012; Peremyslov et al., 2008, 2010; Prokhnevsky et al., 2008; Park and Nebenführ, 2013). Very few studies have examined the reproductive tissues of class XI myosin mutants. In rice (Oryza sativa), one myosin XI was shown to be required for normal pollen development under short-day conditions (Jiang et al., 2007). In Arabidopsis, class XI myosins are required for stigmatic papillae elongation, which is necessary for normal fertility (Ojangu et al., 2012). Even though pollen tubes of myosin XI mutants have not been examined, the tip growth of another tip-growing plant cell has been thoroughly examined in myosin mutants. Root hairs are tubular outgrowths of root epidermal cells that function to increase the surface area of the root for water and nutrient uptake. Two myosin XI mutants have shorter root hairs, of which the myo11e1 (xik; myosin XI K) mutation has been shown to be associated with a slower root hair growth rate and reduced actin dynamics compared with the wild type (Ojangu et al., 2007; Peremyslov et al., 2008; Park and Nebenführ, 2013). Higher order mutants have a further reduction in root hair growth and have altered actin organization (Prokhnevsky et al., 2008; Peremyslov et al., 2010). Disruption of actin organization was also observed in myosin XI mutants of the moss Physcomitrella patens (Vidali et al., 2010), where these motors appear to coordinate the formation of actin filaments in the apical dome of the tip-growing protonemal cells (Furt et al., 2013). Interestingly, organelle movements in P. patens are much slower than in angiosperms and do not seem to depend on myosin motors (Furt et al., 2012).The function of myosins in pollen tubes is currently not known, although it is generally assumed that they are responsible for the prominent cytoplasmic streaming observed in these cells by associating with organelle surfaces (Kohno and Shimmen, 1988; Shimmen, 2007). Myosin from lily (Lilium longiflorum) pollen tubes was isolated biochemically and shown to move actin filaments with a speed of about 8 µm s⁻¹ (Yokota and Shimmen, 1994) in a calcium-dependent manner (Yokota et al., 1999). Antibodies against this myosin labeled small structures in both the tip region and along the shank (Yokota et al., 1995), consistent with the proposed role of this motor in moving secretory vesicles to the apex.In Arabidopsis, six of 13 myosin XI genes are highly expressed in pollen: Myo11A1 (XIA), Myo11A2 (XID), Myo11B1 (XIB), Myo11C1 (XIC), Myo11C2 (XIE), and Myo11D (XIJ; Peremyslov et al., 2011; Sparkes, 2011). The original gene names (Reddy and Day, 2001) are given in parentheses. Myo11D is the only short-tailed myosin XI in Arabidopsis (Mühlhausen and Kollmar, 2013) and lacks the typical myosin XI globular tail involved in cargo binding (Li and Nebenführ, 2007). The remaining genes have the same domain architecture as the conventional class XI myosins that have been shown to be involved in the elongation of trichomes, stigmatic papillae, and root hairs (Ojangu et al., 2007, 2012; Peremyslov et al., 2008, 2010; Prokhnevsky et al., 2008; Park and Nebenführ, 2013). Therefore, we predicted that these five pollen-expressed, conventional class XI myosins are required for the rapid elongation of pollen tubes. In this study, we examined transfer DNA (T-DNA) insertion mutants of Myo11A1, Myo11A2, Myo11B1, Myo11C1, and Myo11C2 for defects in fertility and pollen tube growth. Organelle motility and actin organization were also examined in myo11c1 myo11c2 pollen tubes.     

The Apical Actin Fringe Contributes to Localized Cell Wall Deposition and Polarized Growth in the Lily Pollen Tube

In lily (Lilium formosanum) pollen tubes, pectin, a major component of the cell wall, is delivered through regulated exocytosis. The targeted transport and secretion of the pectin-containing vesicles may be controlled by the cortical actin fringe at the pollen tube apex. Here, we address the role of the actin fringe using three different inhibitors of growth: brefeldin A, latrunculin B, and potassium cyanide. Brefeldin A blocks membrane trafficking and inhibits exocytosis in pollen tubes; it also leads to the degradation of the actin fringe and the formation of an aggregate of filamentous actin at the base of the clear zone. Latrunculin B, which depolymerizes filamentous actin, markedly slows growth but allows focused pectin deposition to continue. Of note, the locus of deposition shifts frequently and correlates with changes in the direction of growth. Finally, potassium cyanide, an electron transport chain inhibitor, briefly stops growth while causing the actin fringe to completely disappear. Pectin deposition continues but lacks focus, instead being delivered in a wide arc across the pollen tube tip. These data support a model in which the actin fringe contributes to the focused secretion of pectin to the apical cell wall and, thus, to the polarized growth of the pollen tube.Pollen tubes provide an excellent model for studying the molecular and physiological processes that lead to polarized cell growth. Because all plant cell growth results from the regulated yielding of the cell wall in response to uniform turgor pressure (Winship et al., 2010; Rojas et al., 2011), the cell wall of the pollen tube must yield only at a particular spot: the cell apex, or tip. To accomplish the extraordinary growth rates seen in many species, and to balance the thinning of the apical wall due to rapid expansion, the pollen tube delivers prodigious amounts of wall material, largely methoxylated pectins, to the tip in a coordinated manner. Recent studies suggest that the targeted exocytosis increases the extensibility of the cell wall matrix at the tip, which then yields to the existing turgor pressure, permitting the tip to extend or grow (McKenna et al., 2009; Hepler et al., 2013). There are many factors that influence exocytosis in growing pollen tubes; in this study, we investigate the role of the apical actin fringe.For many years, it has been known that an actin structure exists near the pollen tube tip, yet its exact form has been a matter of some contention (Kost et al., 1998; Lovy-Wheeler et al., 2005; Wilsen et al., 2006; Cheung et al., 2008; Vidali et al., 2009; Qu et al., 2013). The apical actin structure has been variously described as a fringe, a basket, a collar, or a mesh. Using rapid freeze fixation of lily (Lilium formosanum) pollen tubes followed by staining with anti-actin antibodies, the structure appears as a dense fringe of longitudinally oriented microfilaments, beginning 1 to 5 µm behind the apex and extending 5 to 10 µm basally. The actin filaments are positioned in the cortical cytoplasm close to the plasma membrane (Lovy-Wheeler et al., 2005). More recently, we used Lifeact-mEGFP, a probe that consistently labels this palisade of longitudinally oriented microfilaments in living cells (Vidali et al., 2009; Fig. 1A, left column). For the purposes of this study, we will refer to this apical organization of actin as a fringe.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.The actin fringe and the thickened pollen tube tip wall are stable, although dynamic, structures during pollen tube growth. A, The left column shows a pollen tube transformed with Lifeact-mEGFP imaged with a spinning-disc confocal microscope. Maximal projections from every 15 s are shown. The right column shows epifluorescence images of a pollen tube stained with PI. Again, images captured every 15 s are shown. Bars = 10 μm. B, The data from the pollen tube in A expressing Lifeact-mEGFP were subjected to kymograph analysis using an 11-pixel strip along the image’s midline. C, The first three frames from the pollen tube in A and B were assigned the colors red, blue, and green, respectively, and then overlaid. Areas with white show the overlap of all three. The fringe is stable, but most of its constituent actin is not shared between frames.Many lines of evidence demonstrate that actin is required for pollen tube growth. Latrunculin B (LatB), which blocks actin polymerization, inhibits pollen tube growth and disrupts the cortical fringe at concentrations as low as 2 nm. Higher concentrations are needed to block pollen grain germination and cytoplasmic streaming (Gibbon et al., 1999; Vidali et al., 2001). Actin-binding proteins, including actin depolymerizing factor-cofilin, formin, profilin, and villin, and signaling proteins, such as Rho-of-Plants (ROP) GTPases and their effectors (ROP interacting crib-containing proteins [RICs]), also have been shown to play critical roles in growth and actin dynamics (Fu et al., 2001; Vidali et al., 2001; Allwood et al., 2002; Chen et al., 2002; Cheung and Wu, 2004; McKenna et al., 2004; Gu et al., 2005; Ye et al., 2009; Cheung et al., 2010; Staiger et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2010a; Qu et al., 2013; van Gisbergen and Bezanilla, 2013).Our understanding of the process of exocytosis and pollen tube elongation has been influenced by ultrastructural images of pollen tube tips, which reveal an apical zone dense with vesicles (Cresti et al., 1987; Heslop-Harrison, 1987; Lancelle et al., 1987; Steer and Steer, 1989; Lancelle and Hepler, 1992; Derksen et al., 1995). It has long been assumed that these represent exocytotic vesicles destined to deliver new cell wall material. This model of polarized secretion has been challenged in recent years in studies using FM dyes. Two groups have suggested that exocytosis occurs in a circumpolar annular zone (Bove et al., 2008; Zonia and Munnik, 2008). However, other studies, using fluorescent beads attached to the cell surface, indicate that the maximal rate of expansion, and of necessity the greatest deposition of cell wall material, occurs at the apex along the polar axis of the tube (Dumais et al., 2006; Rojas et al., 2011). Similarly, our experiments with propidium iodide (PI; McKenna et al., 2009; Rounds et al., 2011a) and pectin methyl esterase fused to GFP (McKenna et al., 2009) show that the wall is thickest at the very tip and suggest that wall materials are deposited at the polar axis, consistent with the initial model of exocytosis (Lancelle and Hepler, 1992). Experiments using tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) pollen and a receptor-like kinase fused to GFP also indicate that exocytosis occurs largely at the apical polar axis (Lee et al., 2008).Many researchers argue that apical actin is critical for exocytosis (Lee et al., 2008; Cheung et al., 2010; Qin and Yang, 2011; Yan and Yang, 2012). More specifically, recent work suggests that the fringe participates in targeting vesicles and thereby contributes to changes in growth direction (Kroeger et al., 2009; Bou Daher and Geitmann, 2011; Dong et al., 2012). In this article, using three different inhibitors, namely brefeldin A (BFA), LatB, and potassium cyanide (KCN), we test the hypothesis that polarized pectin deposition in pollen tubes requires the actin fringe. Our data show that during normal growth, pectin deposition is focused to the apex along the polar axis of the tube. However, when growth is modulated, different end points arise, depending on the inhibitor. With BFA, exocytosis stops completely, and the fringe disappears, with the appearance of an actin aggregate at the base of the clear zone. LatB, as shown previously (Vidali et al., 2009), incompletely degrades the actin fringe and leaves a rim of F-actin around the apical dome. Here, we show that, in the presence of LatB, pectin deposition continues, with the focus of this activity shifting in position frequently as the slowly elongating pollen tube changes direction. With KCN, the actin fringe degrades completely, but exocytosis continues and becomes depolarized, with pectin deposits now occurring across a wide arc of the apical dome. This dome often swells as deposition continues, only stopping once normal growth resumes. Taken together, these results support a role for the actin fringe in controlling the polarity of growth in the lily pollen tube.     

Patterns of Metabolite Changes Identified from Large-Scale Gene Perturbations in Arabidopsis Using a Genome-Scale Metabolic Network

Metabolomics enables quantitative evaluation of metabolic changes caused by genetic or environmental perturbations. However, little is known about how perturbing a single gene changes the metabolic system as a whole and which network and functional properties are involved in this response. To answer this question, we investigated the metabolite profiles from 136 mutants with single gene perturbations of functionally diverse Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genes. Fewer than 10 metabolites were changed significantly relative to the wild type in most of the mutants, indicating that the metabolic network was robust to perturbations of single metabolic genes. These changed metabolites were closer to each other in a genome-scale metabolic network than expected by chance, supporting the notion that the genetic perturbations changed the network more locally than globally. Surprisingly, the changed metabolites were close to the perturbed reactions in only 30% of the mutants of the well-characterized genes. To determine the factors that contributed to the distance between the observed metabolic changes and the perturbation site in the network, we examined nine network and functional properties of the perturbed genes. Only the isozyme number affected the distance between the perturbed reactions and changed metabolites. This study revealed patterns of metabolic changes from large-scale gene perturbations and relationships between characteristics of the perturbed genes and metabolic changes.Rational and quantitative assessment of metabolic changes in response to genetic modification (GM) is an open question and in need of innovative solutions. Nontargeted metabolite profiling can detect thousands of compounds, but it is not easy to understand the significance of the changed metabolites in the biochemical and biological context of the organism. To better assess the changes in metabolites from nontargeted metabolomics studies, it is important to examine the changed metabolites in the context of the genome-scale metabolic network of the organism.Metabolomics is a technique that aims to quantify all the metabolites in a biological system (Nikolau and Wurtele, 2007; Nicholson and Lindon, 2008; Roessner and Bowne, 2009). It has been used widely in studies ranging from disease diagnosis (Holmes et al., 2008; DeBerardinis and Thompson, 2012) and drug discovery (Cascante et al., 2002; Kell, 2006) to metabolic reconstruction (Feist et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2012) and metabolic engineering (Keasling, 2010; Lee et al., 2011). Metabolomic studies have demonstrated the possibility of identifying gene functions from changes in the relative concentrations of metabolites (metabotypes or metabolic signatures; Ebbels et al., 2004) in various species including yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Raamsdonk et al., 2001; Allen et al., 2003), Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Brotman et al., 2011), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum; Schauer et al., 2006), and maize (Zea mays; Riedelsheimer et al., 2012). Metabolomics has also been used to better understand how plants interact with their environments (Field and Lake, 2011), including their responses to biotic and abiotic stresses (Dixon et al., 2006; Arbona et al., 2013), and to predict important agronomic traits (Riedelsheimer et al., 2012). Metabolite profiling has been performed on many plant species, including angiosperms such as Arabidopsis, poplar (Populus trichocarpa), and Catharanthus roseus (Sumner et al., 2003; Rischer et al., 2006), basal land plants such as Selaginella moellendorffii and Physcomitrella patens (Erxleben et al., 2012; Yobi et al., 2012), and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Fernie et al., 2012; Davis et al., 2013). With the availability of whole genome sequences of various species, metabolomics has the potential to become a useful tool for elucidating the functions of genes using large-scale systematic analyses (Fiehn et al., 2000; Saito and Matsuda, 2010; Hur et al., 2013).Although metabolomics data have the potential for identifying the roles of genes that are associated with metabolic phenotypes, the biochemical mechanisms that link functions of genes with metabolic phenotypes are still poorly characterized. For example, we do not yet know the principles behind how perturbing the expression of a single gene changes the metabolic system as a whole. Large-scale metabolomics data have provided useful resources for linking phenotypes to genotypes (Fiehn et al., 2000; Roessner et al., 2001; Tikunov et al., 2005; Schauer et al., 2006; Lu et al., 2011; Fukushima et al., 2014). For example, Lu et al. (2011) compared morphological and metabolic phenotypes from more than 5,000 Arabidopsis chloroplast mutants using gas chromatography (GC)- and liquid chromatography (LC)-mass spectrometry (MS). Fukushima et al. (2014) generated metabolite profiles from various characterized and uncharacterized mutant plants and clustered the mutants with similar metabolic phenotypes by conducting multidimensional scaling with quantified metabolic phenotypes. Nonetheless, representation and analysis of such a large amount of data remains a challenge for scientific discovery (Lu et al., 2011). In addition, these studies do not examine the topological and functional characteristics of metabolic changes in the context of a genome-scale metabolic network. To understand the relationship between genotype and metabolic phenotype, we need to investigate the metabolic changes caused by perturbing the expression of a gene in a genome-scale metabolic network perspective, because metabolic pathways are not independent biochemical factories but are components of a complex network (Berg et al., 2002; Merico et al., 2009).Much progress has been made in the last 2 decades to represent metabolism at a genome scale (Terzer et al., 2009). The advances in genome sequencing and emerging fields such as biocuration and bioinformatics enabled the representation of genome-scale metabolic network reconstructions for model organisms (Bassel et al., 2012). Genome-scale metabolic models have been built and applied broadly from microbes to plants. The first step toward modeling a genome-scale metabolism in a plant species started with developing a genome-scale metabolic pathway database for Arabidopsis (AraCyc; Mueller et al., 2003) from reference pathway databases (Kanehisa and Goto, 2000; Karp et al., 2002; Zhang et al., 2010). Genome-scale metabolic pathway databases have been built for several plant species (Mueller et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2005, 2010; Urbanczyk-Wochniak and Sumner, 2007; May et al., 2009; Dharmawardhana et al., 2013; Monaco et al., 2013, 2014; Van Moerkercke et al., 2013; Chae et al., 2014; Jung et al., 2014). Efforts have been made to develop predictive genome-scale metabolic models using enzyme kinetics and stoichiometric flux-balance approaches (Sweetlove et al., 2008). de Oliveira Dal’Molin et al. (2010) developed a genome-scale metabolic model for Arabidopsis and successfully validated the model by predicting the classical photorespiratory cycle as well as known key differences between redox metabolism in photosynthetic and nonphotosynthetic plant cells. Other genome-scale models have been developed for Arabidopsis (Poolman et al., 2009; Radrich et al., 2010; Mintz-Oron et al., 2012), C. reinhardtii (Chang et al., 2011; Dal’Molin et al., 2011), maize (Dal’Molin et al., 2010; Saha et al., 2011), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor; Dal’Molin et al., 2010), and sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum; Dal’Molin et al., 2010). These predictive models have the potential to be applied broadly in fields such as metabolic engineering, drug target discovery, identification of gene function, study of evolutionary processes, risk assessment of genetically modified crops, and interpretations of mutant phenotypes (Feist and Palsson, 2008; Ricroch et al., 2011).Here, we interrogate the metabotypes caused by 136 single gene perturbations of Arabidopsis by analyzing the relative concentration changes of 1,348 chemically identified metabolites using a reconstructed genome-scale metabolic network. We examine the characteristics of the changed metabolites (the metabolites whose relative concentrations were significantly different in mutants relative to the wild type) in the metabolic network to uncover biological and topological consequences of the perturbed genes.     

Surveying Rubisco Diversity and Temperature Response to Improve Crop Photosynthetic Efficiency

The threat to global food security of stagnating yields and population growth makes increasing crop productivity a critical goal over the coming decades. One key target for improving crop productivity and yields is increasing the efficiency of photosynthesis. Central to photosynthesis is Rubisco, which is a critical but often rate-limiting component. Here, we present full Rubisco catalytic properties measured at three temperatures for 75 plants species representing both crops and undomesticated plants from diverse climates. Some newly characterized Rubiscos were naturally “better” compared to crop enzymes and have the potential to improve crop photosynthetic efficiency. The temperature response of the various catalytic parameters was largely consistent across the diverse range of species, though absolute values showed significant variation in Rubisco catalysis, even between closely related species. An analysis of residue differences among the species characterized identified a number of candidate amino acid substitutions that will aid in advancing engineering of improved Rubisco in crop systems. This study provides new insights on the range of Rubisco catalysis and temperature response present in nature, and provides new information to include in models from leaf to canopy and ecosystem scale.In a changing climate and under pressure from a population set to hit nine billion by 2050, global food security will require massive changes to the way food is produced, distributed, and consumed (Ort et al., 2015). To match rising demand, agricultural production must increase by 50 to 70% in the next 35 years, and yet the gains in crop yields initiated by the green revolution are slowing, and in some cases, stagnating (Long and Ort, 2010; Ray et al., 2012). Among a number of areas being pursued to increase crop productivity and food production, improving photosynthetic efficiency is a clear target, offering great promise (Parry et al., 2007; von Caemmerer et al., 2012; Price et al., 2013; Ort et al., 2015). As the gatekeeper of carbon entry into the biosphere and often acting as the rate-limiting step of photosynthesis, Rubisco, the most abundant enzyme on the planet (Ellis, 1979), is an obvious and important target for improving crop photosynthetic efficiency.Rubisco is considered to exhibit comparatively poor catalysis, in terms of catalytic rate, specificity, and CO₂ affinity (Tcherkez et al., 2006; Andersson, 2008), leading to the suggestion that even small increases in catalytic efficiency may result in substantial improvements to carbon assimilation across a growing season (Zhu et al., 2004; Parry et al., 2013; Galmés et al., 2014a; Carmo-Silva et al., 2015). If combined with complimentary changes such as optimizing other components of the Calvin Benson or photorespiratory cycles (Raines, 2011; Peterhansel et al., 2013; Simkin et al., 2015), optimized canopy architecture (Drewry et al., 2014), or introducing elements of a carbon concentrating mechanism (Furbank et al., 2009; Lin et al., 2014a; Hanson et al., 2016; Long et al., 2016), Rubisco improvement presents an opportunity to dramatically increase the photosynthetic efficiency of crop plants (McGrath and Long, 2014; Long et al., 2015; Betti et al., 2016). A combination of the available strategies is essential for devising tailored solutions to meet the varied requirements of different crops and the diverse conditions under which they are typically grown around the world.Efforts to engineer an improved Rubisco have not yet produced a “super Rubisco” (Parry et al., 2007; Ort et al., 2015). However, advances in engineering precise changes in model systems continue to provide important developments that are increasing our understanding of Rubisco catalysis (Spreitzer et al., 2005; Whitney et al., 2011a, 2011b; Morita et al., 2014; Wilson et al., 2016), regulation (Andralojc et al., 2012; Carmo-Silva and Salvucci, 2013; Bracher et al., 2015), and biogenesis (Saschenbrecker et al., 2007; Whitney and Sharwood, 2008; Lin et al., 2014b; Hauser et al., 2015; Whitney et al., 2015).A complementary approach is to understand and exploit Rubisco natural diversity. Previous characterization of Rubisco from a limited number of species has not only demonstrated significant differences in the underlying catalytic parameters, but also suggests that further undiscovered diversity exists in nature and that the properties of some of these enzymes could be beneficial if present in crop plants (Carmo-Silva et al., 2015). Recent studies clearly illustrate the variation possible among even closely related species (Galmés et al., 2005, 2014b, 2014c; Kubien et al., 2008; Andralojc et al., 2014; Prins et al., 2016).Until recently, there have been relatively few attempts to characterize the consistency, or lack thereof, of temperature effects on in vitro Rubisco catalysis (Sharwood and Whitney, 2014), and often studies only consider a subset of Rubisco catalytic properties. This type of characterization is particularly important for future engineering efforts, enabling specific temperature effects to be factored into any attempts to modify crops for a future climate. In addition, the ability to coanalyze catalytic properties and DNA or amino acid sequence provides the opportunity to correlate sequence and biochemistry to inform engineering studies (Christin et al., 2008; Kapralov et al., 2011; Rosnow et al., 2015). While the amount of gene sequence information available grows rapidly with improving technology, knowledge of the corresponding biochemical variation resulting has yet to be determined (Cousins et al., 2010; Carmo-Silva et al., 2015; Sharwood and Whitney, 2014; Nunes-Nesi et al., 2016).This study aimed to characterize the catalytic properties of Rubisco from diverse species, comprising a broad range of monocots and dicots from diverse environments. The temperature dependence of Rubisco catalysis was evaluated to tailor Rubisco engineering for crop improvement in specific environments. Catalytic diversity was analyzed alongside the sequence of the Rubisco large subunit gene, rbcL, to identify potential catalytic switches for improving photosynthesis and productivity. In vitro results were compared to the average temperature of the warmest quarter in the regions where each species grows to investigate the role of temperature in modulating Rubisco catalysis.     

PLASTID MOVEMENT IMPAIRED1 and PLASTID MOVEMENT IMPAIRED1-RELATED1 Mediate Photorelocation Movements of Both Chloroplasts and Nuclei

Organelle movement and positioning play important roles in fundamental cellular activities and adaptive responses to environmental stress in plants. To optimize photosynthetic light utilization, chloroplasts move toward weak blue light (the accumulation response) and escape from strong blue light (the avoidance response). Nuclei also move in response to strong blue light by utilizing the light-induced movement of attached plastids in leaf cells. Blue light receptor phototropins and several factors for chloroplast photorelocation movement have been identified through molecular genetic analysis of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). PLASTID MOVEMENT IMPAIRED1 (PMI1) is a plant-specific C2-domain protein that is required for efficient chloroplast photorelocation movement. There are two PLASTID MOVEMENT IMPAIRED1-RELATED (PMIR) genes, PMIR1 and PMIR2, in the Arabidopsis genome. However, the mechanism in which PMI1 regulates chloroplast and nuclear photorelocation movements and the involvement of PMIR1 and PMIR2 in these organelle movements remained unknown. Here, we analyzed chloroplast and nuclear photorelocation movements in mutant lines of PMI1, PMIR1, and PMIR2. In mesophyll cells, the pmi1 single mutant showed severe defects in both chloroplast and nuclear photorelocation movements resulting from the impaired regulation of chloroplast-actin filaments. In pavement cells, pmi1 mutant plants were partially defective in both plastid and nuclear photorelocation movements, but pmi1pmir1 and pmi1pmir1pmir2 mutant lines lacked the blue light-induced movement responses of plastids and nuclei completely. These results indicated that PMI1 is essential for chloroplast and nuclear photorelocation movements in mesophyll cells and that both PMI1 and PMIR1 are indispensable for photorelocation movements of plastids and thus, nuclei in pavement cells.In plants, organelles move within the cell and become appropriately positioned to accomplish their functions and adapt to the environment (for review, see Wada and Suetsugu, 2004). Light-induced chloroplast movement (chloroplast photorelocation movement) is one of the best characterized organelle movements in plants (Suetsugu and Wada, 2012). Under weak light conditions, chloroplasts move toward light to capture light efficiently (the accumulation response; Zurzycki, 1955). Under strong light conditions, chloroplasts escape from light to avoid photodamage (the avoidance response; Kasahara et al., 2002; Sztatelman et al., 2010; Davis and Hangarter, 2012; Cazzaniga et al., 2013). In most green plant species, these responses are induced primarily by the blue light receptor phototropin (phot) in response to a range of wavelengths from UVA to blue light (approximately 320–500 nm; for review, see Suetsugu and Wada, 2012; Wada and Suetsugu, 2013; Kong and Wada, 2014). Phot-mediated chloroplast movement has been shown in land plants, such as Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Jarillo et al., 2001; Kagawa et al., 2001; Sakai et al., 2001), the fern Adiantum capillus-veneris (Kagawa et al., 2004), the moss Physcomitrella patens (Kasahara et al., 2004), and the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha (Komatsu et al., 2014). Two phots in Arabidopsis, phot1 and phot2, redundantly mediate the accumulation response (Sakai et al., 2001), whereas phot2 primarily regulates the avoidance response (Jarillo et al., 2001; Kagawa et al., 2001; Luesse et al., 2010). M. polymorpha has only one phot that mediates both the accumulation and avoidance responses (Komatsu et al., 2014), although two or more phots mediate chloroplast photorelocation movement in A. capillus-veneris (Kagawa et al., 2004) and P. patens (Kasahara et al., 2004). Thus, duplication and functional diversification of PHOT genes have occurred during land plant evolution, and plants have gained a sophisticated light sensing system for chloroplast photorelocation movement.In general, movements of plant organelles, including chloroplasts, are dependent on actin filaments (for review, see Wada and Suetsugu, 2004). Most organelles common in eukaryotes, such as mitochondria, peroxisomes, and Golgi bodies, use the myosin motor for their movements, but there is no clear evidence that chloroplast movement is myosin dependent (for review, see Suetsugu et al., 2010a). Land plants have innovated a novel actin-based motility system that is specialized for chloroplast movement as well as a photoreceptor system (for review, see Suetsugu et al., 2010a; Wada and Suetsugu, 2013; Kong and Wada, 2014). Chloroplast-actin (cp-actin) filaments, which were first found in Arabidopsis, are short actin filaments specifically localized around the chloroplast periphery at the interface between the chloroplast and the plasma membrane (Kadota et al., 2009). Strong blue light induces the rapid disappearance of cp-actin filaments and then, their subsequent reappearance preferentially at the front region of the moving chloroplasts. This asymmetric distribution of cp-actin filaments is essential for directional chloroplast movement (Kadota et al., 2009; Kong et al., 2013a). The greater the difference in the amount of cp-actin filaments between the front and rear regions of chloroplasts becomes, the faster the chloroplasts move, in which the magnitude of the difference is determined by fluence rate (Kagawa and Wada, 2004; Kadota et al., 2009; Kong et al., 2013a). Strong blue light-induced disappearance of cp-actin filaments is regulated in a phot2-dependent manner before the intensive polymerization of cp-actin filaments at the front region occurs (Kadota et al., 2009; Ichikawa et al., 2011; Kong et al., 2013a). This phot2-dependent response contributes to the greater difference in the amount of cp-actin filaments between the front and rear regions of chloroplasts. Similar behavior of cp-actin filaments has also been observed in A. capillus-veneris (Tsuboi and Wada, 2012) and P. patens (Yamashita et al., 2011).Like chloroplasts, nuclei also show light-mediated movement and positioning (nuclear photorelocation movement) in land plants (for review, see Higa et al., 2014b). In gametophytic cells of A. capillus-veneris, weak light induced the accumulation responses of both chloroplasts and nuclei, whereas strong light induced avoidance responses (Kagawa and Wada, 1993, 1995; Tsuboi et al., 2007). However, in mesophyll cells of Arabidopsis, strong blue light induced both chloroplast and nuclear avoidance responses, but weak blue light induced only the chloroplast accumulation response (Iwabuchi et al., 2007, 2010; Higa et al., 2014a). In Arabidopsis pavement cells, small numbers of tiny plastids were found and showed autofluorescence under the confocal laser-scanning microscopy (Iwabuchi et al., 2010; Higa et al., 2014a). Hereafter, the plastid in the pavement cells is called the pavement cell plastid. Strong blue light-induced avoidance responses of pavement cell plastids and nuclei were induced in a phot2-dependent manner, but the accumulation response was not detected for either organelle (Iwabuchi et al., 2007, 2010; Higa et al., 2014a). In both Arabidopsis and A. capillus-veneris, phots mediate nuclear photorelocation movement, and phot2 mediates the nuclear avoidance response (Iwabuchi et al., 2007, 2010; Tsuboi et al., 2007). The nuclear avoidance response is dependent on actin filaments in both mesophyll and pavement cells of Arabidopsis (Iwabuchi et al., 2010). Recently, it was shown that the nuclear avoidance response relies on cp-actin-dependent movement of pavement cell plastids, where nuclei are associated with pavement cell plastids of Arabidopsis (Higa et al., 2014a). In mesophyll cells, nuclear avoidance response is likely dependent on cp-actin filament-mediated chloroplast movement, because the mutants deficient in chloroplast movement were also defective in nuclear avoidance response (Higa et al., 2014a). Thus, phots mediate both chloroplast (and pavement cell plastid) and nuclear photorelocation movement by regulating cp-actin filaments.Molecular genetic analyses of Arabidopsis mutants deficient in chloroplast photorelocation movement have identified many molecular factors involved in signal transduction and/or motility systems as well as those involved in the photoreceptor system for chloroplast photorelocation movement (and thus, nuclear photorelocation movement; for review, see Suetsugu and Wada, 2012; Wada and Suetsugu, 2013; Kong and Wada, 2014). CHLOROPLAST UNUSUAL POSITIONING1 (CHUP1; Oikawa et al., 2003) and KINESIN-LIKE PROTEIN FOR ACTIN-BASED CHLOROPLAST MOVEMENT (KAC; Suetsugu et al., 2010b) are key factors for generating and/or maintaining cp-actin filaments. Both proteins are highly conserved in land plants and essential for the movement and attachment of chloroplasts to the plasma membrane in Arabidopsis (Oikawa et al., 2003, 2008; Suetsugu et al., 2010b), A. capillus-veneris (Suetsugu et al., 2012), and P. patens (Suetsugu et al., 2012; Usami et al., 2012). CHUP1 is localized on the chloroplast outer membrane and binds to globular and filamentous actins and profilin in vitro (Oikawa et al., 2003, 2008; Schmidt von Braun and Schleiff, 2008). Although KAC is a kinesin-like protein, it lacks microtubule-dependent motor activity but has filamentous actin binding activity (Suetsugu et al., 2010b). An actin-bundling protein THRUMIN1 (THRUM1) is required for efficient chloroplast photorelocation movement (Whippo et al., 2011) and interacts with cp-actin filaments (Kong et al., 2013a). chup1 and kac mutant plants were shown to lack detectable cp-actin filaments (Kadota et al., 2009; Suetsugu et al., 2010b; Ichikawa et al., 2011; Kong et al., 2013a). Similarly, cp-actin filaments were rarely detected in thrum1 mutant plants (Kong et al., 2013a), indicating that THRUM1 also plays an important role in maintaining cp-actin filaments.Other proteins J-DOMAIN PROTEIN REQUIRED FOR CHLOROPLAST ACCUMULATION RESPONSE1 (JAC1; Suetsugu et al., 2005), WEAK CHLOROPLAST MOVEMENT UNDER BLUE LIGHT1 (WEB1; Kodama et al., 2010), and PLASTID MOVEMENT IMPAIRED2 (PMI2; Luesse et al., 2006; Kodama et al., 2010) are involved in the light regulation of cp-actin filaments and chloroplast photorelocation movement. JAC1 is an auxilin-like J-domain protein that mediates the chloroplast accumulation response through its J-domain function (Suetsugu et al., 2005; Takano et al., 2010). WEB1 and PMI2 are coiled-coil proteins that interact with each other (Kodama et al., 2010). Although web1 and pmi2 were partially defective in the avoidance response, the jac1 mutation completely suppressed the phenotype of web1 and pmi2, suggesting that the WEB1/PMI2 complex suppresses JAC1 function (i.e. the accumulation response) under strong light conditions (Kodama et al., 2010). Both web1 and pmi2 showed impaired disappearance of cp-actin filaments in response to strong blue light (Kodama et al., 2010). However, the exact molecular functions of these proteins are unknown.In this study, we characterized mutant plants deficient in the PMI1 gene and two homologous genes PLASTID MOVEMENT IMPAIRED1-RELATED1 (PMIR1) and PMIR2. PMI1 was identified through molecular genetic analyses of pmi1 mutants that showed severe defects in chloroplast accumulation and avoidance responses (DeBlasio et al., 2005). PMI1 is a plant-specific C2-domain protein (DeBlasio et al., 2005; Zhang and Aravind, 2010), but its roles and those of PMIRs in cp-actin-mediated chloroplast and nuclear photorelocation movements remained unclear. Thus, we analyzed chloroplast and nuclear photorelocation movements in the single, double, and triple mutants of pmi1, pmir1, and pmir2.     

Focus on Ethylene: Ethylene and the Regulation of Physiological and Morphological Responses to Nutrient Deficiencies

To cope with nutrient deficiencies, plants develop both morphological and physiological responses. The regulation of these responses is not totally understood, but some hormones and signaling substances have been implicated. It was suggested several years ago that ethylene participates in the regulation of responses to iron and phosphorous deficiency. More recently, its role has been extended to other deficiencies, such as potassium, sulfur, and others. The role of ethylene in so many deficiencies suggests that, to confer specificity to the different responses, it should act through different transduction pathways and/or in conjunction with other signals. In this update, the data supporting a role for ethylene in the regulation of responses to different nutrient deficiencies will be reviewed. In addition, the results suggesting the action of ethylene through different transduction pathways and its interaction with other hormones and signaling substances will be discussed.When plants suffer from a mineral nutrient deficiency, they develop morphological and physiological responses (mainly in their roots) aimed to facilitate the uptake and mobilization of the limiting nutrient. After the nutrient has been acquired in enough quantity, these responses need to be switched off to avoid toxicity and conserve energy. In recent years, different plant hormones (e.g. ethylene, auxin, cytokinins, jasmonic acid, abscisic acid, brassinosteroids, GAs, and strigolactones) have been implicated in the regulation of these responses (Romera et al., 2007, 2011, 2015; Liu et al., 2009; Rubio et al., 2009; Kapulnik et al., 2011; Kiba et al., 2011; Iqbal et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2014).Before the 1990s, there were several publications relating ethylene and nutrient deficiencies (cited in Lynch and Brown [1997] and Romera et al. [1999]) without establishing a direct implication of ethylene in the regulation of nutrient deficiency responses. In 1994, Romera and Alcántara (1994) published an article in Plant Physiology suggesting a role for ethylene in the regulation of Fe deficiency responses. In 1999, Borch et al. (1999) showed the participation of ethylene in the regulation of P deficiency responses. Since then, evidence has been accumulating in support of a role for ethylene in the regulation of both Fe (Romera et al., 1999, 2015; Waters and Blevins, 2000; Lucena et al., 2006; Waters et al., 2007; García et al., 2010, 2011, 2013, 2014; Yang et al., 2014) and P deficiency responses (Kim et al., 2008; Lei et al., 2011; Li et al., 2011; Nagarajan and Smith, 2012; Wang et al., 2012, 2014c). Both Fe and P may be poorly available in most soils, and plants develop similar responses under their deficiencies (Romera and Alcántara, 2004; Zhang et al., 2014). More recently, a role for ethylene has been extended to other deficiencies, such as K (Shin and Schachtman, 2004; Jung et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2012), S (Maruyama-Nakashita et al., 2006; Wawrzyńska et al., 2010; Moniuszko et al., 2013), and B (Martín-Rejano et al., 2011). Ethylene has also been implicated in both N deficiency and excess (Tian et al., 2009; Mohd-Radzman et al., 2013; Zheng et al., 2013), and its participation in Mg deficiency has been suggested (Hermans et al., 2010).In this update, we will review the information supporting a role for ethylene in the regulation of different nutrient deficiency responses. For information relating ethylene to other aspects of plant mineral nutrition, such as N₂ fixation and responses to excess of nitrate or essential heavy metals, the reader is referred to other reviews (for review, see Maksymiec, 2007; Mohd-Radzman et al., 2013; Steffens, 2014).