Inhibition of the U1A-RNA complex by an aminoacridine derivative

The RNA recognition motif (RRM) is one of the most common RNA binding domains. There have been few investigations of small molecule inhibitors of RRM-RNA complexes, although these inhibitors could be valuable tools for probing biological processes involving RRM-RNA complexes and would have the potential to be effective drugs. In this paper, the inhibition by small molecules of the complex formed between the N-terminal RRM of the U1A protein and stem loop 2 of U1 snRNA has been investigated. An aminoacridine derivative has been found to promote dissociation of the U1A-stem loop 2 RNA complex with an IC(50) value of 1 microM. Fluorescence experiments indicate that two aminoacridine ligands bind to each RNA target site. RNase A footprinting suggests that one binding site may be near the base pair that closes the loop and the other may be in a more flexible region of the loop. The addition of the aminoacridine derivative to stem loop 2 RNA increases the susceptibility of other portions of the loop to digestion by RNase A, which implies that binding of the ligand changes the conformation or dynamics of the stem loop target site. Either direct binding to the RNA or indirect alteration of the structure or dynamics of the loop would be likely to inhibit binding of the U1A protein to this RNA.     

Affinity and specificity of protein U1A-RNA complex formation based on an additive component free energy model

An MM-GBSA computational protocol was used to investigate wild-type U1A-RNA and F56 U1A mutant experimental binding free energies. The trend in mutant binding free energies compared to wild-type is well-reproduced. Following application of a linear-response-like equation to scale the various energy components, the binding free energies agree quantitatively with observed experimental values. Conformational adaptation contributes to the binding free energy for both the protein and the RNA in these systems. Small differences in DeltaGs are the result of different and sometimes quite large relative contributions from various energetic components. Residual free energy decomposition indicates differences not only at the site of mutation, but throughout the entire protein. MM-GBSA and ab initio calculations performed on model systems suggest that stacking interactions may nearly, but not completely, account for observed differences in mutant binding affinities. This study indicates that there may be different underlying causes of ostensibly similar experimentally observed binding affinities of different mutants, and thus recommends caution in the interpretation of binding affinities and specificities purely by inspection.     

Molecular dynamics studies of U1A-RNA complexes

The U1A protein binds to a hairpin RNA and an internal-loop RNA with picomolar affinities. To probe the molecular basis of U1A binding, we performed state-of-the-art nanosecond molecular dynamics simulations on both complexes. The good agreement with experimental structures supports the protocols used in the simulations. We compare the dynamics, hydrogen-bonding occupancies, and interfacial flexibility of both complexes and also describe a rigid-body motion in the U1A-internal loop complex that is not observed in the U1A-hairpin simulation. We relate these observations to experimental mutational studies and highlight their significance in U1A binding affinity and specificity.     

Investigating the binding specificity of U1A-RNA by computational mutagenesis

The mammalian spliceosomal protein U1A binds a hairpin RNA with picomolar affinity. To examine the origin of this binding specificity, we carried out computational mutagenesis on protein and RNA residues in the U1A-RNA binding interface. Our computational mutagenesis methods calculate the relative binding affinity between mutant and wild-type as the sum of molecular mechanical energies and solvation free energies estimated with a continuum solvent model. We obtained good agreement with experimental studies and we verified mutations that abolish and improve binding. Therefore, we offer these methods as computationally inexpensive tools for investigating and predicting the effects of site-specific mutagenesis.     

A study of collective atomic fluctuations and cooperativity in the U1A-RNA complex based on molecular dynamics simulations

Cooperative interactions play an important role in recognition and binding in macromolecular systems. In this study, we find that cross-correlated atomic fluctuations can be used to identify cooperative networks in a protein–RNA system. The dynamics of the RRM-containing protein U1A–stem loop 2 RNA complex have been calculated theoretically from a 10 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. The simulation was analyzed by calculating the covariance matrix of all atomic fluctuations. These matrix elements are then presented in the form of a two-dimensional grid, which displays fluctuations on a per residue basis. The results indicate the presence of strong, selective cross-correlated fluctuations throughout the RRM in U1A–RNA. The atomic fluctuations correspond well with previous biophysical studies in which a multiplicity of cooperative networks have been reported and indicate that the various networks identified in separate individual experiments are fluctuationally correlated into a hyper-network encompassing most of the RRM. The calculated results also correspond well with independent results from a statistical covariance analysis of 330 aligned RRM sequences. This method has significant implications as a predictive tool regarding cooperativity in the protein–nucleic acid recognition process.     

Rescuing an essential enzyme-RNA complex with a non-essential appended domain.

Certain protein-RNA complexes, such as synthetase-tRNA complexes, are essential for cell survival. These complexes are formed with a precise molecular fit along the interface of the reacting partners, and mutational analyses have shown that amino acid or nucleotide substitutions at the interface can be used to disrupt functional or repair non-functional complexes. In contrast, we demonstrate here a feature of a eukaryote system that rescues a disrupted complex without directly re-engineering the interface. The monomeric yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase, like several other class I eukaryote tRNA synthetases, has an active-site-containing ''body'' that is closely homologous to its Escherichia coli relative, but is tagged at its N-terminus with a novel and dispensable appended domain whose role has been obscure. Because of differences between the yeast and E. coli glutamine tRNAs that presumably perturb the enzyme-tRNA interface, E. coli glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase does not charge yeast tRNA. However, linking the novel appended domain of the yeast to the E. coli enzyme enabled the E. coli protein to function as a yeast enzyme, in vitro and in vivo. The appended domain appears to contribute an RNA interaction that compensates for weak or poor complex formation. In eukaryotes, extra appended domains occur frequently in these proteins. These domains may be essential when there are conditions that would otherwise weaken or disrupt formation of a critical RNA-protein complex. They may also be adapted for other, specialized RNA-related functions in specific instances.     

The nucleoporin Seh1 forms a complex with Mio and serves an essential tissue-specific function in Drosophila oogenesis

The nuclear pore complex (NPC) mediates the transport of macromolecules between the nucleus and cytoplasm. Recent evidence indicates that structural nucleoporins, the building blocks of the NPC, have a variety of unanticipated cellular functions. Here, we report an unexpected tissue-specific requirement for the structural nucleoporin Seh1 during Drosophila oogenesis. Seh1 is a component of the Nup107-160 complex, the major structural subcomplex of the NPC. We demonstrate that Seh1 associates with the product of the missing oocyte (mio) gene. In Drosophila, mio regulates nuclear architecture and meiotic progression in early ovarian cysts. Like mio, seh1 has a crucial germline function during oogenesis. In both mio and seh1 mutant ovaries, a fraction of oocytes fail to maintain the meiotic cycle and develop as pseudo-nurse cells. Moreover, the accumulation of Mio protein is greatly diminished in the seh1 mutant background. Surprisingly, our characterization of a seh1 null allele indicates that, although required in the female germline, seh1 is dispensable for the development of somatic tissues. Our work represents the first examination of seh1 function within the context of a multicellular organism. In summary, our studies demonstrate that Mio is a novel interacting partner of the conserved nucleoporin Seh1 and add to the growing body of evidence that structural nucleoporins can have novel tissue-specific roles.     

Sequence-specific interaction of U1 snRNA with the SMN complex

The survival of motor neurons (SMN) protein complex functions in the biogenesis of spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) and prob ably other RNPs. All spliceosomal snRNPs have a common core of seven Sm proteins. To mediate the assembly of snRNPs, the SMN complex must be able to bring together Sm proteins with U snRNAs. We showed previously that SMN and other components of the SMN complex interact directly with several Sm proteins. Here, we show that the SMN complex also interacts specifically with U1 snRNA. The stem--loop 1 domain of U1 (SL1) is necessary and sufficient for SMN complex binding in vivo and in vitro. Substitution of three nucleotides in the SL1 loop (SL1A3) abolishes SMN interaction, and the corresponding U1 snRNA (U1A3) is impaired in U1 snRNP biogenesis. Microinjection of excess SL1 but not SL1A3 into Xenopus oocytes inhibits SMN complex binding to U1 snRNA and U1 snRNP assembly. These findings indicate that SMN complex interaction with SL1 is sequence-specific and critical for U1 snRNP biogenesis, further supporting the direct role of the SMN complex in RNP biogenesis.     

Spatial orientation and dynamics of the U1A proteins in the U1A-UTR complex

The human U1A protein contains three distinct domains: the N-terminal RBD1 (amino acids 1-101), the C-terminal RBD2 (amino acids 195-282), and the linker region (amino acids 102-194). The RBD1 domains of two U1A proteins bind specifically to two internal loops in the 3' untranslated region (3' UTR) of its own pre-mRNA. Tryptophan fluorescence and fluorescence resonance energy transfer data show that the two RBD2 domains do not interact with any regions of the UTR complex and display an overall tumbling that is uncorrelated from the core of the complex (formed by RBD1-UTR), indicating that the linker regions of the two U1A proteins remain flexible. The two RBD2 domains are separated by an apparent distance greater than 74 A in the UTR complex. The linker region adjacent to the RBD1 domain (103-ERDRKREKRKPKSQETP-119) is supposedly involved in protein-protein interactions (12). A single cysteine, introduced at position 101 or 121 of the U1A protein, was used as a specific attachment site for the fluorophore pair IAEDANS [N'-iodoacetyl-N'-(1-sulfo-5-n-naphthyl)ethylenediamine]/DABMI [4-(dimethylamino)-phenylazophenyl-4'-maleimide]. In the U1A-UTR complex (2:1), the dyes at the 101 position are separated by = approximately 51 A, while the dyes at the 121 position are at an apparent distance = approximately 58 A. The 101-121 crossed distance on adjacent U1A proteins averages to = 55 A. These results suggest that the amino acid sequence 101-121 of the two U1A proteins in the complex are held in proximity to each other in a compact conformation.     

The NUP1 gene encodes an essential component of the yeast nuclear pore complex

Monoclonal antibodies generated against a family of related nuclear pore complex proteins (nucleoporins) from rat liver nuclei cross-react with several proteins in the yeast S. cerevisiae and show punctate nuclear envelope staining similar to the pattern seen in mammalian cells. We have cloned a gene encoding one of these proteins (NUP1) and have confirmed the localization of the NUP1 protein to the pore complex by immunofluorescence, using an epitope-tagged construct to differentiate it from other members of this family. The NUP1 protein is essential for cell viability, and overexpression from the yeast GAL10 promoter prevents further cell growth. The central domain of NUP1 consists of a series of degenerate repeats similar to those found in the nucleoskeletal protein NSP1, a protein that cross-reacts with monoclonal antibodies against NUP1. We propose that the repetitive domain is a feature common to the nucleoporins.     

UBAP1 is a component of an endosome-specific ESCRT-I complex that is essential for MVB sorting

Endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRTs) regulate several events involving membrane invagination, including multivesicular body (MVB) biogenesis, viral budding, and cytokinesis. In each case, upstream ESCRTs combine with additional factors, such as Bro1 proteins, to recruit ESCRT-III and the ATPase VPS4 in order to drive membrane scission. A clue to understanding how such diverse cellular processes might be controlled independently of each other has been the identification of ESCRT isoforms. Mammalian ESCRT-I comprises TSG101, VPS28, VPS37A-D, and MVB12A/B. These could generate several ESCRT-I complexes, each targeted to a different compartment and able to recruit distinct ESCRT-III proteins. Here we identify a novel ESCRT-I component, ubiquitin-associated protein 1 (UBAP1), which contains a region conserved in MVB12. UBAP1 binds the endosomal Bro1 protein His domain protein tyrosine phosphatase (HDPTP), but not Alix, a Bro1 protein involved in cytokinesis. UBAP1 is required for sorting EGFR to the MVB and for endosomal ubiquitin homeostasis, but not for cytokinesis. UBAP1 is part of a complex that contains a fraction of total cellular TSG101 and that also contains VPS37A but not VPS37C. Hence, the presence of UBAP1, in combination with VPS37A, defines an endosome-specific ESCRT-I complex.     

The p400 complex is an essential E1A transformation target

Here, we report the identification of a new E1A binding protein complex that is essential for E1A-mediated transformation. Its core component is a SWI2/SNF2-related, 400 kDa protein (p400). Other components include the myc- and p/CAF-associated cofactor, TRRAP/PAF400, the DNA helicases TAP54alpha/beta, actin-like proteins, and the human homolog of the Drosophila Enhancer of Polycomb protein. An E1A mutant, defective in p400 binding, is also defective in transformation. Certain p400 fragments partially rescued this phenotype, underscoring the role of E1A-p400 complex formation in the E1A transforming process. Furthermore, E1A and c-myc each alter the subunit composition of p400 complexes, implying that physiological p400 complex formation contributes to transformation suppression.     

Identification of a stable complex of trichosanthin with nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate

Trichosanthin, a type I ribosome-inactivating protein with RNAN-glycosidase activity, forms a stable complex with nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate, a substrate analog. Difference UV spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, and³¹P NMR are used to identify the formation of the complex, followed by a crystal structure analysis carried out to elucidate the active-site structure of trichosanthin. The determination of germinal vesicle breakdown indicates that the complex does not, at least for abortion-inducing activity, result in competitive inhibition to the protein.     

人U_1和U_2snRNA基因定位缺失和取代突变

 用寡聚核苷酸诱导的定位突变法,将人U_1和U_2snRNA基因的5'-端调控区域的一段能与SV_(40)T抗原相结合的DNA删去,造成缺失突变,改变这段DNA核苷酸的排列顺序,造成取代突变。突变株用原位杂交法筛选,由限制性内切酶电泳图谱分析和DNA顺序测定得到证实。突变率约为5％。     

Correlated motions in the U1 snRNA stem/loop 2:U1A RBD1 complex

The complex formed by U1A RBD1 and the U1 snRNA stem/loop II is noted for its high affinity and exquisite specificity. Here, that complex is investigated by 5 ns molecular dynamics simulations and analyzed by reorientational eigenmode dynamics to determine the dynamic properties of the RNA:protein interface that could contribute to the binding mechanism. The analysis shows that there is extensive correlation between motions of the RNA and protein, involving 7 of the 10 RNA loop nucleotides, the protein beta-sheet surface, two of its loops, and its C-terminal tripeptide sequence. Order parameters of these regions of the complex are uniformly high, indicating restricted motion. However, several regions of both RNA and protein retain local flexibility, notably three nucleotides of the RNA loop and one loop of RBD1 that does not contact RNA. The highly correlated motions involving both molecules reflect the intricate network of interactions that characterize this complex and could account in part for the thermodynamic coupling observed for complex formation.     

SCCRO (DCUN1D1) is an essential component of the E3 complex for neddylation

Covalent modification of cullins by the ubiquitin-like protein NEDD8 (neddylation) regulates protein ubiquitination by promoting the assembly of cullin-RING ligase E3 complexes. Like ubiquitination, neddylation results from an enzymatic cascade involving the sequential activity of a dedicated E1 (APPBP1/Uba3), E2 (Ubc12), and an ill-defined E3. We show that SCCRO (also known as DCUN1D1) binds to the components of the neddylation pathway (Cullin-ROC1, Ubc12, and CAND1) and augments but is not required for cullin neddylation in reactions using purified recombinant proteins. We also show that SCCRO recruits Ubc12 approximately NEDD8 to the CAND1-Cul1-ROC1 complex but that this is not sufficient to dissociate or overcome the inhibitory effects of CAND1 on cullin neddylation in purified protein assays. In contrast to findings in cellular systems where no binding is seen, we show that SCCRO and CAND1 can bind to the neddylated Cul1-ROC1 complex in assays using purified recombinant proteins. Although neddylated (not unneddylated) Cul1-ROC1 is released from CAND1 upon incubation with testis lysate from SCCRO+/+ mice, the addition of recombinant SCCRO is required to achieve the same results in lysate from SCCRO(-/-) mice. Combined, these results suggest that SCCRO is an important component of the neddylation E3 complex that functions to recruit charged E2 and is involved in the release of inhibitory effects of CAND1 on cullin-RING ligase E3 complex assembly and activity.     

Identification of the active oligomeric state of an essential adenine DNA methyltransferase from Caulobacter crescentus

Caulobacter crescentus contains one of the two known prokaryotic DNA methyltransferases that lacks a cognate endonuclease. This endogenous cell cycle regulated adenine DNA methyltransferase (CcrM) is essential for C. crescentus cellular viability. DNA methylation catalyzed by CcrM provides an obligatory signal for the proper progression through the cell cycle. To further our understanding of the regulatory role played by CcrM, we sought to investigate its biophysical properties. In this paper we employed equilibrium ultracentrifugation, velocity ultracentrifugation, and chemical cross-linking to show that CcrM is dimeric at physiological concentrations. However, surface plasmon resonance experiments in the presence of S-adenosyl-homocysteine evince that CcrM binds as a monomer to a defined hemi-methylated DNA substrate containing the canonical methylation sequence, GANTC. Initial velocity experiments demonstrate that dimerization of CcrM does not affect DNA methylation. Collectively, these findings suggest that CcrM is active as a monomer and provides a possible in vivo role for dimerization as a means to stabilize CcrM from premature catabolism.