MAX1 and MAX2 control shoot lateral branching in Arabidopsis

Plant shoots elaborate their adult form by selective control over the growth of both their primary shoot apical meristem and their axillary shoot meristems. We describe recessive mutations at two loci in Arabidopsis, MAX1 and MAX2, that affect the selective repression of axillary shoots. All the first order (but not higher order) axillary shoots initiated by mutant plants remain active, resulting in bushier shoots than those of wild type. In vegetative plants where axillary shoots develop in a basal to apical sequence, the mutations do not clearly alter node distance, from the shoot apex, at which axillary shoot meristems initiate but shorten the distance at which the first axillary leaf primordium is produced by the axillary shoot meristem. A small number of mutant axillary shoot meristems is enlarged and, later in development, a low proportion of mutant lateral shoots is fasciated. Together, this suggests that MAX1 and MAX2 do not control the timing of axillary meristem initiation but repress primordia formation by the axillary meristem. In addition to shoot branching, mutations at both loci affect leaf shape. The mutations at MAX2 cause increased hypocotyl and petiole elongation in light-grown seedlings. Positional cloning identifies MAX2 as a member of the F-box leucine-rich repeat family of proteins. MAX2 is identical to ORE9, a proposed regulator of leaf senescence ( Woo, H. R., Chung, K. M., Park, J.-H., Oh, S. A., Ahn, T., Hong, S. H., Jang, S. K. and Nam, H. G. (2001) Plant Cell 13, 1779-1790). Our results suggest that selective repression of axillary shoots involves ubiquitin-mediated degradation of as yet unidentified proteins that activate axillary growth.     

Effect of mutations in the PINHEAD gene of Arabidopsis on the formation of shoot apical meristems

The primary shoot apical meristem of angiosperm plants is formed during embryogenesis. Lateral shoot apical meristems arise postembryonically in the axils of leaves. Recessive mutations at the PINHEAD locus of Arabidopsis interfere with the ability of both the primary shoot apical meristem as well as lateral shoot apical meristems to form. However, adventitious shoot apical meristems can form in pinhead mutant seedlings from the axils of the cotyledons and also from cultred root explants. In this report, the phenotype of pinhead mutants is described, and a hypothesis for the role of the wild-type PINHEAD gene product in shoot meristem initiation is presented. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

On the potential for evolutionary change in meristematic cell lineages through intraorganismal selection

In the absence of sexual recombination somatic mutations represent the only source of genetic variation in clonally propagating plants. We analyse the probability of such somatic mutations in the shoot apical meristem being fixed in descendant generations of meristems. A model of meristem cell dynamics is presented for the unstratified shoot apical meristem. The fate of one mutant initial is studied for a two- and three-celled shoot apical meristem. The main parameters of the model are the number of apical initials, the time between selection cycles, number of selection cycles and cell viability of the mutant genotype. As the number of mitotic divisions per selection cycle and number of selection cycles increases the chimeric state dissipates and the probability of mutation fixation approaches an asymptote. The value of this fixation asymptote depends primarily on cell viability, while the time to reach it is mainly influenced by the total number of mitotic divisions as well as the number of initials. In contrast to the presumed operation of Muller’s Ratchet in plants the chimeric state may represent an opportunity for deleterious mutations to be eliminated through intraorganismal selection or random drift. We conclude that intraorganismal selection not only can be a substantial force for the elimination of deleterious mutations, but also can have the potential to confer an evolutionary change through a meristematic cell lineage alone.     

Axillary meristem development in the branchless Zu-0 ecotype of Arabidopsis thaliana

Axillary meristems form in the leaf axils during post-embryonic development. In order to initiate the genetic dissection of axillary meristem development, we have characterized the late-flowering branchless ecotype of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh., Zu-0. The first-formed rosette leaves of Zu-0 plants all initiate axillary meristems, but later-formed leaves of the rosette remain branchless. Alteration in the meristem development is axillary meristem-specific because the shoot apical and floral meristems develop normally. Scanning electron microscopy, histology and RNA in situ analysis with SHOOTMERISTEMLESS ( STM), a marker for meristematic tissues, show that a mound of cells form and STM mRNA accumulates in barren leaf axils, indicating that axillary meristems initiate but arrest in their development prior to organizing a meristem proper. Expression and retention of the STM RNA in barren leaf axils further suggests that STM expression is not sufficient for the establishment of the axillary meristem proper.     

DETERMINATE (det) MUTANT OF PISUM SATIVUM (LEGUMINOSAE: PAPILIONOIDEAE) EXHIBITS AN INDETERMINATE GROWTH PATTERN

Inflorescence ontogeny and morphology of the det mutant of Pisum sativum L. were investigated using scanning electron microscopy. This mutation causes the production of a limited number of axillary flowers followed by the formation of an apparent terminal flower slightly offset from the vertical. Our study indicates that the apparent terminal flower arises from an axillary meristem. The terminal meristem senesces and differentiates hairs, forming a rudimentary stub in the same manner as axillary meristems of conventional (Det) and det plants. Thus the dramatic effect of the det gene on inflorescence architecture results from early apical arrest rather than conversion of the terminal meristem to a flower as implied by the symbol det. This mutant will be valuable in elucidating regulation of apical arrest.     

Genetic and morphological characterization of the barley <Emphasis Type="Italic">uniculm2</Emphasis> (<Emphasis Type="Italic">cul2</Emphasis>) mutant

Axillary meristem growth and development help define plant architecture in barley (Hordeum vulgare L). Plants carrying the recessive uniculm2 (cul2) mutation initiate vegetative axillary meristem development but fail to develop tillers. In addition, inflorescence axillary meristems develop into spikelets, but the spikelets at the distal end of the inflorescence have an altered phyllotaxy and are sometimes absent. Double mutant combinations of cul2 and nine other recessive mutations that exhibit low to high tiller number phenotypes resulted in a uniculm vegetative phenotype. One exception was the occasional multiple shoots produced in combination with granum-a; a high tillering mutant that occasionally produces two shoot apical meristems. These results show that the CUL2 gene product plays a role in the development of axillary meristems into tillers but does not regulate the development of vegetative apical meristems. Moreover, novel double-mutant inflorescence phenotypes were observed with cul2 in combination with the other mutants. These data show that the wild-type CUL2 gene product is involved in controlling proper inflorescence development and that it functions in combination with some of the other genes that affect branching. Our genetic analysis indicates that there are genetically separate but not distinct regulatory controls on vegetative and inflorescence axillary development. Finally, to facilitate future positionally cloning of cul2, we positioned cul2 on chromosome 6(6H) of the barley RFLP map.     

No evidence of a generalized potential ‘cost’ of apical dominance for species that have strong apical dominance

尚无证据表明顶端优势强的物种存在广义顶端优势潜在“成本”     

Development of white spruce somatic embryos: II. Continual shoot meristem development during germination

Summary This study compares the development of shoot apical meristems of white spruce somatic and zygotic embryos during germination. In mature somatic embryos, the functional part of the shoot apical meristem was bi-layered. After partial drying, a normal shoot meristem was formed from these two cell layers during germination. Other cells within the meristem were vacuolated and separated by intercellular air spaces. In the absence of the partial drying treatment, somatic embryos enlarged in size primarily due to vacuolation of cells and the formation of large intercellular air spaces. A majority of these somatic embryos failed to form a functional shoot apical meristem. Compared with somatic embryos, the shoot apical meristem of a mature zygotic embryo was well organized with a densely cytoplasmic apical layer. The cells within the meristem were tightly packed. Judging from the cell profiles during germination, all cells within the meristem of the zygotic embryo took part in the formation of the vegetative shoot apical meristem.     

TERMINAL FLOWER1 is a mobile signal controlling Arabidopsis architecture

Shoot meristems harbor stem cells that provide key growing points in plants, maintaining themselves and generating all above-ground tissues. Cell-to-cell signaling networks maintain this population, but how are meristem and organ identities controlled? TERMINAL FLOWER1 (TFL1) controls shoot meristem identity throughout the plant life cycle, affecting the number and identity of all above-ground organs generated; tfl1 mutant shoot meristems make fewer leaves, shoots, and flowers and change identity to flowers. We find that TFL1 mRNA is broadly distributed in young axillary shoot meristems but later becomes limited to central regions, yet affects cell fates at a distance. How is this achieved? We reveal that the TFL1 protein is a mobile signal that becomes evenly distributed across the meristem. TFL1 does not enter cells arising from the flanks of the meristem, thus allowing primordia to establish their identity. Surprisingly, TFL1 movement does not appear to occur in mature shoots of leafy (lfy) mutants, which eventually stop proliferating and convert to carpel/floral-like structures. We propose that signals from LFY in floral meristems may feed back to promote TFL1 protein movement in the shoot meristem. This novel feedback signaling mechanism would ensure that shoot meristem identity is maintained and the appropriate inflorescence architecture develops.     

AXR1 acts after lateral bud formation to inhibit lateral bud growth in Arabidopsis

The AXR1 gene of Arabidopsis is required for many auxin responses. The highly branched shoot phenotype of mature axr1 mutant plants has been taken as genetic evidence for a role of auxin in the control of shoot branching. We compared the development of lateral shoots in wild-type Columbia and axr1-12 plants. In the wild type, the pattern of lateral shoot development depends on the developmental stage of the plant. During prolonged vegetative growth, axillary shoots arise and develop in a basal-apical sequence. After floral transition, axillary shoots arise rapidly along the primary shoot axis and grow out to form lateral inflorescences in an apical-basal sequence. For both patterns, the axr1 mutation does not affect the timing of axillary meristem formation; however, subsequent lateral shoot development proceeds more rapidly in axr1 plants. The outgrowth of lateral inflorescences from excised cauline nodes of wild-type plants is inhibited by apical auxin. axr1-12 nodes are resistant to this inhibition. These results provide evidence for common control of axillary growth in both patterns, and suggest a role for auxin during the late stages of axillary shoot development following the formation of the axillary bud and several axillary leaf primordia.     

The control of shoot branching: an example of plant information processing

Throughout their life cycle, plants adjust their body plan to suit the environmental conditions in which they are growing. A good example of this is in the regulation of shoot branching. Axillary meristems laid down in each leaf formed from the primary shoot apical meristem can remain dormant, or activate to produce a branch. The decision whether to activate an axillary meristem involves the assessment of a wide range of external environmental, internal physiological and developmental factors. Much of this information is conveyed to the axillary meristem via a network of interacting hormonal signals that can integrate inputs from diverse sources, combining multiple local signals to generate a rich source of systemically transmitted information. Local interpretation of the information provides another layer of control, ensuring that appropriate decisions are made. Rapid progress in molecular biology is uncovering the component parts of this signalling network, and combining this with physiological studies and mathematical modelling will allow the operation of the system to be better understood.     

Coordination of cell proliferation and cell fate decisions in the angiosperm shoot apical meristem.

A unique feature of flowering plants is their ability to produce organs continuously, for hundreds of years in some species, from actively growing tips called apical meristems. All plants possess at least one form of apical meristem, whose cells are functionally analogous to animal stem cells because they can generate specialized organs and tissues. The shoot apical meristem of angiosperm plants acts as a continuous source of pluripotent stem cells, whose descendents become incorporated into organ primordia and acquire different fates. Recent studies are unveiling some of the molecular pathways that specify stem cell fate in the center of the shoot apical meristem, that confer organ founder cell fate on the periphery, and that connect meristem patterning elements with events at the cellular level. The results are providing important insights into the mechanisms through which shoot apical meristems integrate cell fate decisions with cellular proliferation and global regulation of growth and development.     

The interaction of two homeobox genes,BREVIPEDICELLUS and PENNYWISE,regulates internode patterning in the Arabidopsis inflorescence

Plant architecture results from the activity of the shoot apical meristem, which initiates leaves, internodes, and axillary meristems. KNOTTED1-like homeobox (KNOX) genes are expressed in specific patterns in the shoot apical meristem and play important roles in plant architecture. KNOX proteins interact with BEL1-like (BELL) homeodomain proteins and together bind a target sequence with high affinity. We have obtained a mutation in one of the Arabidopsis BELL genes, PENNYWISE (PNY), that appears phenotypically similar to the KNOX mutant brevipedicellus (bp). Both bp and pny have randomly shorter internodes and display a slight increase in the number of axillary branches. The double mutant shows a synergistic phenotype of extremely short internodes interspersed with long internodes and increased branching. PNY is expressed in inflorescence and floral meristems and overlaps with BP in a discrete domain of the inflorescence meristem where we propose the internode is patterned. The physical association of the PNY and BP proteins suggests that they participate in a complex that regulates early patterning events in the inflorescence meristem.     

Morphogenesis and Patterning at the Organ Boundaries in the Higher Plant Shoot Apex

Formation of lateral organ primordia from the shoot apical meristem creates boundaries that separate the primordium from surrounding tissue. Morphological and gene expression studies indicate the presence of a distinct set of cells that define the boundaries in the plant shoot apex. Cells at the boundary usually display reduced growth activity that results in separation of adjacent organs or tissues and this morphological boundary coincides with the border of different cell identities. Such morphogenetic and patterning events and their spatial coordination are controlled by a number of boundary-specific regulatory genes. The boundary may also act as a reference point for the generation of new meristems such as axillary meristems. Many of the genes involved in meristem initiation are expressed in the boundary. This review summarizes the cellular characters of the shoot organ boundary and the roles of regulatory genes that control different aspects of this unique region in plant development.     

DIFFERENTIATION OF LATERAL SHOOTS AS THORNS IN ULEX EUROPAEUS

Ulex europaeus is a much-branched shrub with small, narrow, spine-tipped leaves and axillary thorn shoots. The origin and development of axillary shoots was studied as a basis for understanding the changes that occur in the axillary shoot apex as it differentiates into a thorn. Axillary bud primordia are derived from detached portions of the apical meristem of the primary shoot. Bud primordia in the axils of juvenile leaves on seedlings develop as leafy shoots while those in the axils of adult leaves become thorns. A variable degree of vegetative development prior to thorn differentiation is exhibited among these secondary thorn shoots even on the same axis. Commonly the meristems of secondary axillary shoots initiate 3–9 bracteal leaves with tertiary axillary buds before differentiating as thorns. In other cases the meristems develop a greater number of leaves and tertiary buds as thorn differentiation is delayed. The initial stages in the differentiation of secondary shoot meristems as thorns are detected between plastochrons 10–20, depending on vigor of the parent shoot. A study of successive lateral buds on a shoot shows an abrupt conversion from vegetative development to thorn differentiation. The conversion involves the termination of meristematic activity of the apex and cessation of leaf initiation. Within the apex a vertical elongation of cells of the rib meristem initials and their immediate derivatives commences the attenuation of the apex which results in the pointed thorn. All cells of the apex elongate parallel to the axis and proceed to sclerify basipetally. Back of the apex some cortical cells in which cell division has persisted longer differentiate as chlorenchyma. Although no new leaves are initiated during the extension of the apex, provascular strands are present in the thorn tip. Fibrovascular bundles and bundles of cortical fibers not associated with vascular tissue differentiate in the thorn tip and are correlated in position with successive incipient leaves in the expected phyllotactic sequence, the more developed bundles being related to the first incipient leaves. Some secondary shoots displayed variable atypical patterns of meristem differentiation such as abrupt conversion of the apex resulting in sclerification with limited cell elongation and small, inhibited leaves. These observations raise questions concerning the nature of thorn induction and the commitment of meristems to thorns.