Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study

In the past decade, changing attitudes toward breast reconstruction among both patients and providers have led a growing number of women to seek breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Although investigators have documented the psychological, social, emotional, and functional benefits of breast reconstruction, little research has evaluated the effects of procedure choice on these outcomes. The current study prospectively evaluated and compared psychosocial outcomes for three common options for mastectomy reconstruction: tissue expander/implant, pedicle TRAM, and free TRAM techniques. In a prospective cohort design, patients undergoing postmastectomy reconstruction for the first time with expander/implant, pedicle TRAM, or free TRAM procedures were recruited from 12 centers and 23 plastic surgeons in the United States and Canada. Before reconstruction and at 1 year after reconstruction, patients were evaluated by a battery of questionnaires consisting of both generic and condition-specific surveys. Outcomes assessed included emotional well-being, vitality, general mental health, social functioning, functional well-being, social well-being, and body image. Baseline (preoperative) scores and the change in scores (the difference between postoperative and preoperative scores) were compared across procedure types using t tests and analysis of covariance. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative surveys were obtained from 273 patients. Procedure type was reported in 250 patients, of whom 56 received implant reconstructions, 128 pedicle TRAM flaps, and 66 free TRAM flaps. A total of 161 immediate and 89 delayed reconstructions were performed. Among women receiving immediate reconstruction, significant improvements were observed in all psychosocial variables except body image. However, no significant effects of procedure type on these changes over time existed. Similarly, delayed reconstruction patients had significant increases in emotional well-being, vitality, general mental health, functional well-being, and body image. Although the choice of reconstructive technique did not significantly impact most of these outcomes, significant differences existed among procedure types for three psychosocial subscales. Patients undergoing delayed expander/implant reconstructions reported greater improvements in vitality and social well-being relative to women receiving delayed TRAM procedures. By contrast, delayed TRAM patients noted significantly greater gains in body image compared with women choosing delayed expander-implant reconstruction. The authors conclude that both immediate and delayed breast reconstructions provide substantial psychosocial benefits for mastectomy patients. Although the choice of reconstructive procedure does not seem to significantly affect improvements in psychosocial status with immediate reconstruction, our data suggest that procedure type does have a significant effect on gains in vitality and body image for women undergoing delayed reconstruction.     

A 6-year experience with immediate reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer

A 6-year retrospective review is presented of 185 patients who underwent immediate reconstruction of the breast at the same operation as mastectomy for carcinoma. The patients were treated at two institutions under similar protocols of patient selection, surgical technique, and postoperative care. A detailed evaluation is presented from both the oncologic and surgical points of view. The data support the conclusion that immediate reconstruction of the breast does not alter survival or cancer recurrence rates and does not interfere with the treatment of primary or secondary disease. A low incidence of significant surgical complications is also detailed. Combined with previous reports answering psychological concerns about this mode and timing of reconstruction, this review offers significant reassurance about the overall safety of immediate reconstruction. The authors therefore recommend immediate reconstruction of the breast as a safe treatment option for the woman facing mastectomy.     

Surgical options for the early-stage breast cancer: factors associated with patient choice and postoperative quality of life.

Patients with early-stage breast cancer have three surgical options: lumpectomy with radiotherapy, mastectomy alone, and mastectomy with breast reconstruction. Our objective was to compare women in these three groups with respect to demographics, preoperative counseling, postoperative body image, and quality of life. Women having undergone surgery for stage 1 or 2 breast cancer between 1990 and 1995 were selected by random sampling of hospital tumor registries and were mailed a self-administered questionnaire, which included the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 36. Patients were stratified into three mutually exclusive groups: lumpectomy with axillary node dissection and radiotherapy, modified radical mastectomy, and modified radical mastectomy with breast reconstruction. In total, 267 of 525 surveys were returned (50.9 percent). Compared with mastectomy patients, breast reconstruction patients were younger (p < 0.001), better educated (p = 0.001), and more likely Caucasian (p = 0.02). Among mastectomy patients, 54.9 percent recalled that lumpectomy had been discussed preoperatively and 39.7 percent recalled discussion of breast reconstruction. Post-operative comfort with appearance was significantly lower for mastectomy patients. The relationship between type of surgery and postoperative quality of life varied with age. Under 55, quality of life was lowest for mastectomy patients on all but two Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 36 subscales. Over 55, quality of life was lowest for lumpectomy patients on all subscales (p < 0.05 for all subscales except social functioning and role-emotional). Treatment choice may be related to age, race, education, and preoperative counseling. Whereas the effect of breast cancer on a woman's life is complex and individual, the type of surgery performed is a significant variable, whose impact may be related to patient age.     

Breast Reconstruction for Malignant or Premalignant Disease

In ten patients breast reconstruction was done after surgical treatment for a premalignant or malignant breast disease. In six of these, prophylactic subcutaneous mastectomy and implant reconstruction were carried out, and in the remaining four reconstruction was done after simple or modified radical mastectomy. It is suggested that these procedures should be considered by those physicians and surgeons who undertake evaluation and treatment of breast disease in women. Breast reconstruction should be considered and offered to patients who suffer from the severe personal and emotional trauma attendant to surgical operation for breast disease.     

Satisfaction with breast reconstruction in women with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: a descriptive study

Prophylactic bilateral mastectomy is an option for women who are at an increased risk of developing breast cancer. Prophylactic mastectomy is often performed with immediate reconstruction (i.e., at the same time and under the same anesthetic as the mastectomy). Satisfaction with reconstruction has been described previously for women with mastectomy for breast cancer. However, the authors know of no previous research that has reported on satisfaction with reconstruction in patients who have electively sought mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer. Women in the province of Ontario who had undergone prophylactic bilateral mastectomy plus breast reconstruction between 1991 and 2000 were asked to rate their level of satisfaction with the cosmetic results of their mastectomy and reconstruction and their overall satisfaction with their decision to have prophylactic mastectomy. Women were also asked whether they experienced complications associated with their surgery and what types of complications they experienced. Thirty-seven women completed questionnaires for this study, and all of them had immediate breast reconstruction after prophylactic mastectomy. The majority of women (70.3 percent) reported being satisfied or extremely satisfied with the cosmetic results of their breast reconstruction. Women with self-reported postsurgical complications (16.2 percent) were significantly less satisfied with reconstruction than those who did not report complications (p = 0.009). Personal subjective risk of breast cancer before prophylactic mastectomy was negatively correlated with satisfaction with reconstruction (r = -0.38, p = 0.024) and with subjective risk estimation after prophylactic surgery (r = -0.54, p = 0.001). Women who did not worry about developing breast cancer after prophylactic mastectomy had significantly higher levels of satisfaction with breast reconstruction than those who continued to worry (p < 0.001). Women who reported an improved body image after reconstruction were significantly more likely to report higher levels of satisfaction than those who reported a diminished body image (p = 0.007). The majority of women were satisfied with the cosmetic results of breast reconstruction after prophylactic mastectomy. Women who overestimated their breast cancer risk had lower satisfaction levels. Correcting overestimation of breast cancer risk in women who have prophylactic mastectomy may improve satisfaction with reconstruction following prophylactic mastectomy.     

Reasons why mastectomy patients do not have breast reconstruction

Breast reconstruction after mastectomy is valuable, yet only a small percentage of eligible patients ever have reconstruction. Little has been done to determine why so few patients proceed with reconstructive surgery. A homogeneous population of mastectomy patients, some of whom underwent breast reconstruction while others did not, were surveyed regarding their attitudes about breast reconstruction. A total of 245 women were surveyed. One-hundred and fifty-eight (64 percent) responded, 71 of whom had been reconstructed while 87 had not. Comparison of the responses of the two groups suggests factors that play a role in determining whether the mastectomy patient will accept or decline the option of breast reconstruction. Considerations that made it less likely that a woman would pursue reconstruction included advanced age at the time of mastectomy, concern about complications from further surgery, uncertainty about outcome, and fear about the effect of reconstruction on future problems with breast cancer. Marital status, receiving chemotherapy, or knowing a patient who had a bad result from reconstruction did not affect the decision. An awareness and understanding of these factors may be helpful to physicians in counseling patients and in increasing the number of women who enjoy the benefits of breast reconstruction.     

Prophylactic mastectomy: indications, options, and reconstructive alternatives

Prophylactic mastectomy continues to be a controversial procedure as a preventive tool against breast cancer. Recent research and other scientific advances, however, have refocused attention on better risk estimation, evidence of efficacy, and improvements in reconstruction. The recently discovered genetic markers BRCA1 and BRCA2 have become increasingly important in determining risk; a BRCA1-positive patient's risk of developing breast cancer by the age of 65 is estimated at 50 percent to 80 percent. BRCA1- and BRCA2-positive breast cancers also tend to be higher grade and occur in younger women (making mammography less effective). Genetically linked breast cancers are usually estrogen receptor negative, making them less susceptible to chemoprevention. Various predictive models and recommendations by experts in the field are also available for today's clinicians to ascertain who should be genetically tested. The benefit of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy, although difficult to estimate, can be evaluated by looking at the incidence of breast cancer in studies of patients who have previously undergone prophylactic mastectomy. The estimated risk reduction from these studies is 80 percent to 95 percent. Similarly, life expectancy is believed to be increased from 2.9 to 5.3 years. The psychological benefits include a 70 percent rate of satisfaction and a decrease in emotional concern over developing breast cancer by 74 percent of women who underwent prophylactic mastectomy. Although reconstruction results may vary, most patients have been very satisfied and some may achieve cosmetic results that are better than their preoperative situation. Patient selection for specific types of reconstruction after prophylactic mastectomy and the decision to proceed should be based on surgical risk and the likelihood of a good outcome. The choice of mastectomy incision should consider the size of the breast, preexisting scars, patient risk factors, and the planned method and goal of reconstruction. The authors propose certain guidelines based on degree of ptosis and cup size when planning prophylactic mastectomies with reconstruction. In certain cases, a nipple-sparing mastectomy may provide cosmetic advantages that could outweigh the additional oncologic risk.     

The role of reduction mammaplasty in reconstructing partial mastectomy defects

The management of breast tumors in women with macromastia can be challenging. Reconstructive options are limited and breast conservation therapy is often not indicated or results in poor cosmetic outcomes. The purpose of this report was to present a series of women with macromastia who underwent simultaneous reconstruction of a partial mastectomy defect with bilateral reduction mammaplasty. A retrospective review was performed and included all women who underwent partial mastectomy with simultaneous reduction mammaplasty. Data points included patient demographics, preoperative assessment, operative intervention, adjuvant treatment, and outcomes. Twenty women were included in the series (mean age, 43 years; range, 11 to 72 years) with an average body mass index of 32.6 (range, 24.9 to 44.1). Tissue diagnosis was ductal carcinoma (n = 8), ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 6), fibroadenoma (n = 4), and benign breast tissue (n = 2). The various reduction mammaplasty techniques were documented with regard to tumor size and location. The superior medial and inferior pedicles seemed to be the most versatile techniques. One patient required completion mastectomy with autologous tissue reconstruction given positive margins. All patients were disease-free at follow-up (mean, 23 months) and postoperative cancer surveillance was not impaired by the combined procedures. The versatility of reduction mammaplasty allows this procedure to be performed in conjunction with partial mastectomy for any tumor location. Combining these procedures in patients with macromastia provides numerous therapeutic benefits at low cost, while reducing breast distortion and preserving symmetry.     

Women who wish breast reconstruction: characteristics,fears, and hopes

The aims of the present study were to identify the characteristics of a consecutive series of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer and to evaluate the perceived benefits and disadvantages of breast reconstruction. A consecutive series of 125 women completed the Breast Reconstruction Questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. The median age was 48 years (range, 28 to 75 years). A total of 49.6 percent (n = 62) indicated that, if it were possible, they would like breast reconstruction. Logistic regression (simultaneous entry) revealed that younger women (p = 0.0001) and more depressed women (p = 0.026) were more likely to wish reconstruction. Marital status, tumor size, extroversion, neuroticism, and tough-mindedness did not independently predict the desire for reconstruction. If given a choice of reconstruction at 3 months or 6 months after mastectomy, of the women who wished reconstruction, 74 percent would prefer it at 3 months. Of the women who wished reconstruction and expressed a preference, 63 percent were afraid reconstruction might mask recurrence, 39 percent were afraid that reconstruction might cause the cancer to return, and 89 percent thought they would be concerned with their appearance after the operation. Positively, 94 percent considered that reconstruction would be beneficial in terms of their self-esteem, 86 percent indicated that reconstruction would give greater freedom to wear any clothing, and 86 percent thought that the cosmetic appearance of breast reconstruction was better than that of a prosthesis. Concerns about recurrence were common. A better understanding of the concerns of women with regard to reconstruction would allow more informed preoperative discussion.     

National Surgical Breast Project

For public and professional acceptance, clinical studies in breast cancer must be scientifically necessary and ethically justifiable. To resolve controversy based upon retrospective data, they must be prospective and randomized. These guidelines have been used by the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project in its investigations carried out during the past 15 years in numerous cooperating institutions. Neither thio-tepa adjuvant to radical mastectomy, nor prophylactic oophorectomy, nor post-operative radiation therapy were found to prolong life. Therefore, prophylactic oophorectomy is contraindicated and adjuvant chemotherapy cannot be justified except perhaps under special circumstances and as part of carefully controlled clinical trials. Postoperative radiation therapy, even in the presence of positive axillary lymph nodes, cannot be recommended except to minimize the rate of local skin recurrences.The present study addresses itself to the timely controversy surrounding proper management of axillary lymph nodes in primary breast cancer. Does removing them alter the outcome of therapy? Total (simple) mastectomy is being compared with radical mastectomy. Women with clinically negative nodes on physical examination are treated either by total (simple) mastectomy alone or by total mastectomy plus radiation, or by radical mastectomy. When the nodes are clinically positive, either radical mastectomy or total mastectomy followed by radiation is being used.The protocol, now underway more than a year, has been well accepted by patients and by many well informed physicians and surgeons. In years ahead it will provide objective evidence as to whether or not removal of the axillary lymph nodes alters the therapeutic efficacy of mastectomy in the treatment of primary breast cancer.     

Recurrence following treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction

Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction can provide an excellent cosmetic result. Despite its increasing popularity, few studies have assessed the risk of recurrence when the procedure is used for the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ. To evaluate the oncologic safety of skin-sparing mastectomy used for the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ, the recurrence rate was analyzed. Patients with ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive carcinoma or both who underwent skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction between 1985 and 1994 and had a follow-up period of at least 6 years were included in this retrospective analysis. The recurrence rates were determined for invasive carcinoma (with or without foci of ductal carcinoma in situ) and ductal carcinoma in situ alone. A total of 221 patients were included, 177 patients with invasive carcinoma and 44 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ alone. The immediate breast reconstructions were performed with transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flaps in 62 percent of patients, implants in 34 percent of patients, and latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps (with or without implants) in 4 percent of patients. The local recurrence rate was zero of 44 for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ and 5.6 percent (10 of 177) for patients with invasive carcinoma during a mean follow-up period of 9.8 years. There was a 6.8 percent (12 of 177) metastatic recurrence rate in the invasive carcinoma group. All recurrences were invasive ductal carcinoma. Of the patients with ductal carcinoma in situ alone, none developed metastatic disease. The combined metastatic and local recurrence rates for the invasive carcinoma group (n = 177) with each type of reconstruction were 13 percent (14 of 110), 12 percent (seven of 60), and 14 percent (one of seven) for TRAM flaps, implants, and latissimus dorsi flaps, respectively. The risk of recurrence following skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for ductal carcinoma in situ is low during this follow-up period. Therefore, skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction seems to be a safe oncologic treatment option for ductal carcinoma in situ; however, a longer follow-up period is important to determine the long-term risk of recurrence.     

Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning.

Skin-sparing mastectomy by definition describes the procedure of mastectomy, either simple or modified radical, with a minimum amount of skin excision. The surgical skin excision must: (1) include the nipple-areola complex, (2) include the biopsy site, and (3) allow for access to the axilla for possible dissection. In 27 mastectomies, the senior author has had direct input in the preoperative skin planning. All patients underwent immediate breast reconstruction. In large-breasted women, the mastectomy was performed to a Wise-type pattern. In small-breasted women, the mastectomy involved minimal skin excision followed by reconstruction. Non-continuous incisions were frequently used in small-breasted women, thereby minimizing breast scarring. When appropriately applied, skin-sparing mastectomy can greatly improve the final aesthetic result of the breast.     

Salvage of infected expander prostheses in breast reconstruction

Periprosthetic infection is a devastating complication following breast reconstruction with prostheses. Traditional surgical principles dictate removal of the prosthesis to control infection. Although successful salvage of prostheses in the presence of periprosthetic infections has been reported in the plastic and other surgical literature, salvage procedures remain seldom practiced. Reports in the plastic surgery literature have been limited to implant salvage following cosmetic breast augmentation and subcutaneous mastectomy with implants. Salvage of saline-filled expander prostheses used in breast reconstruction following mastectomy for cancer has not been previously reported. The authors review their experience with implant salvage in patients with periprosthetic infections following breast reconstruction for a 6-year period. Fourteen patients (13 with saline-filled expander prostheses and one with silicone prosthesis) underwent implant salvage. Salvage of the breast reconstruction was successful in nine patients. Staphylococcus aureus infection was associated with poorer salvage rate (p = 0.023). Previous radiotherapy to the chest wall did not affect the salvage outcome (p = 0.50). In selected patients, immediate salvage of a breast reconstruction in the presence of prosthesis-related infection remains an alternative to implant removal followed by delayed reconstruction.     

Aesthetic results following partial mastectomy and radiation therapy

This study was undertaken to determine the aesthetic changes inherent in partial mastectomy followed by radiation therapy in the treatment of stage I and stage II breast cancer. A retrospective analysis of breast cancer patients treated according to the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project Protocol B-06 was undertaken in 57 patients from 1984 to the present. The size of mastectomy varied between 2 x 1 cm and 15 x 8 cm. Objective aesthetic outcome, as determined by physical and photographic examination, was influenced primarily by surgical technique as opposed to the effects of radiation. These technical factors included orientation of resections, breast size relative to size of resection, location of tumor, and extent and orientation of axillary dissection. Regarding cosmesis, 80 percent of patients treated in this study judged their result to be excellent or good, in comparison to 50 percent excellent or good as judged by the plastic surgeon. Only 10 percent would consider mastectomy with reconstruction for contralateral disease. Asymmetry and contour abnormalities are far more common than noted in the radiation therapy literature. Patients satisfaction with lumpectomy and radiation, however, is very high. This satisfaction is not necessarily based on objective criteria defining aesthetic parameters, but is strongly influenced by retainment of the breast as an original body part.     

Breast reconstruction using modified tissue expansion

Inadequate chest-wall skin following mastectomy for carcinoma continues to be a problem in many breast reconstructions. To avoid extensive surgery, serial tissue expansion has been advocated. Since 1977, one of the authors has used a simple method of tissue expansion that we have termed "modified tissue expansion", defined as the creation of an adequate breast mound in one or two stages using a permanent prosthesis. Ninety percent of patients undergoing breast reconstruction between 1978 and 1983 were reconstructed using this method. A retrospective analysis of these 208 patients is presented. There were no mortalities, and only a 6.3 percent complication rate. Skin necroses related directly to the prosthesis occurred once, and there were no prosthetic deflations. Eighteen percent had first-step reconstruction only. The initial prosthesis averaged 400 cc in size. Selected Halsted radical mastectomy and postradiotherapy patients were successfully reconstructed. Seventy-eight percent felt their results were excellent at 1 year. Two percent were dissatisfied. Multiple office visits and the potential problems of serial expansion were avoided. Modified tissue expansion is a simple and viable method and should be considered among the options for breast reconstruction following mastectomy.     

Functional MRI To Evaluate “Sense of Self” following Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction

Background

Breast reconstruction is associated with high levels of patient satisfaction. Previous patient satisfaction studies have been subjective. This study utilizes functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to objectively evaluate “sense of self” following deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction in an attempt to better understand patient perception.

Methods

Prospective fMRI analysis was performed on four patients before and after delayed unilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction, and on four patients after immediate unilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Patients were randomly cued to palpate their natural breast, mastectomy site or breast reconstruction, and external silicone models. Three regions of interest (ROIs) associated with self-recognition were examined using a general linear model, and compared using a fixed effects and random effects ANOVA, respectively.

Results

In the delayed reconstruction group, activation of the ROIs was significantly lower at the mastectomy site compared to the natural breast (p<0.01). Ten months following reconstruction, activation of the ROIs in the reconstructed breast was not significantly different from that observed with natural breast palpation. In the immediate reconstruction group, palpation of the reconstructed breast was also similar to the natural breast. This activity was greater than that observed during palpation of external artificial models (p<0.01).

Conclusions

Similar activation patterns were observed during palpation of the reconstructed and natural breasts as compared to the non-reconstructed mastectomy site and artificial models. The cognitive process represented by this pattern may be a mechanism by which breast reconstruction improves self-perception, and thus patient satisfaction following mastectomy.     

Bilateral autogenous breast reconstruction using perforator free flaps: a single center's experience

The authors present a single center's experience in bilateral breast reconstruction using perforator free flaps. The aim of this study was to show their indications, surgical technique, and results. A series of 53 patients underwent this procedure between February of 1996 and October of 2002. The surgical procedures were performed on patients with bilateral breast cancer (11 patients), patients with unilateral breast cancer and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (22 patients), patients who had undergone bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (18 patients), a patient with Poland's syndrome, and a patient whose aesthetic breast augmentation had failed. Primary and secondary bilateral breast reconstructions were done in 18 and four patients, respectively. Eighteen patients who had earlier undergone breast reconstruction with implants had a tertiary breast reconstruction. Combined reconstruction (primary with secondary and primary with tertiary reconstruction) was done in 13 patients. Ninety-eight deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps and eight superior gluteal artery perforator flaps were used. The average operative time was 10 hours (range, 8 to 14.5 hours) for the simultaneous bilateral reconstruction. Total flap necrosis occurred in two cases (one deep inferior epigastric perforator flap and one superior gluteal artery perforator flap). Partial flap necrosis was not encountered, and fat necrosis was found in one deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (1 percent). Two pulmonary infections, one deep vein thrombosis, and one cardiac arrhythmia occurred as postoperative complications. The mean hospital stay was 9 days (range, 6 to 20 days). Abdominal bulging was reported in one patient. There were no recurrent disease or cancer manifestations, with an average follow-up of 3.5 years. This series clearly shows that perforator flaps are reliable and useful tools for bilateral breast reconstruction. This technique decreases the donor-site morbidity and offers an excellent aesthetic and long-term outcome and high patient satisfaction.     

Psychosocial correlates of immediate versus delayed reconstruction of the breast

Two groups of consecutive patients from two different plastic surgical practice populations were evaluated to determine psychosocial differences between those who underwent immediate (n = 25) versus delayed (n = 38) breast reconstruction. Psychological assessment consisted of a standardized symptom inventory (BSI) and a specially designed self-report questionnaire investigating reactions unique to mastectomy and reconstruction. Both groups were extremely equivalent with regard to sociodemographic data, with the typical subject being a well-educated and employed Caucasian wife. Verbal reports of physical complaints revealed no significant differences between the two groups except for difficulty with arm movement, which was statistically higher for the immediate group (p = 0.006.). This difference most likely was due to the axillary dissection being performed simultaneously at the time of reconstruction. The relationship between timing of reconstruction and self-reported distress over the mastectomy experience revealed that only 25 percent of the women who underwent immediate repair reported "high distress" in recalling their mastectomy surgery compared with 60 percent of the delayed reconstruction group (p = 0.02). In reference to the two scales measuring psychological symptoms, a general trend was present, with the delayed group scoring higher (although not statistically significantly) on 9 of our 12 scales. Ninety-six percent of the immediate group and 89 percent of the delayed group reported satisfaction with results.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A breast-halving incision for subcutaneous mastectomy.

A new "breast-halving incision" for subcutaneous mastectomy is described. It has particular advantages in the large breast, where the incidence of complications is much higher. Its main disadvantage is the length of the incision, which runs across the equator of the breast. However, subcutaneous mastectomy is not primarily a cosmetic operation. The improved results in immediate reconstruction would seem to justify this approach.     

Breast reconstruction with postmastectomy radiation therapy: current issues

Two recent trials have demonstrated superior locoregional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival in node-positive breast cancer patients with the addition of postmastectomy radiation therapy to mastectomy and chemotherapy. Based on these results, there has been an increased use of postmastectomy in patients with early-stage breast cancer. The inability to determine which patients will require postmastectomy radiation therapy has increased the complexity of planning for immediate breast reconstruction. There are two potential problems with performing an immediate breast reconstruction in a patient who will require postmastectomy radiation therapy. One problem is that postmastectomy radiation therapy can adversely affect the aesthetic outcome of an immediate breast reconstruction. Several studies have evaluated the outcomes of breast reconstructions that were performed before radiation therapy and have revealed a high incidence of complications and poor aesthetic outcomes. Furthermore, these studies have found that often an additional flap is required to restore breast shape and symmetry. The other potential problem is that an immediate breast reconstruction can interfere with the delivery of postmastectomy radiation therapy. During planning for immediate breast reconstruction, it is imperative to carefully review the stage of disease and the likelihood the patient will require postmastectomy radiation therapy. Unfortunately, the ability to detect and predict the presence or extent of axillary lymph node involvement is limited, and the need for postmastectomy radiation therapy is usually not known until after mastectomy. In all cases of decision making regarding possible postoperative radiation therapy and whether or not to perform immediate breast reconstruction, the situation should be discussed at a multidisciplinary conference or addressed among the various medical, surgical, and radiation teams, with active participation by the patient. Immediate breast reconstruction probably should be avoided in patients known to require postmastectomy radiation therapy and delayed until it is certain the therapy will be needed in patients who may require the therapy.