The regulatory role of c‐MYC on HDAC2 and PcG expression in human multipotent stem cells

Myelocytomatosis oncogene (c‐MYC) is a well‐known nuclear oncoprotein having multiple functions in cell proliferation, apoptosis and cellular transformation. Chromosomal modification is also important to the differentiation and growth of stem cells. Histone deacethylase (HDAC) and polycomb group (PcG) family genes are well‐known chromosomal modification genes. The aim of this study was to elucidate the role of c‐MYC in the expression of chromosomal modification via the HDAC family genes in human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs). To achieve this goal, c‐MYC expression was modified by gene knockdown and overexpression via lentivirus vector. Using the modified c‐MYC expression, our study was focused on cell proliferation, differentiation and cell cycle. Furthermore, the relationship of c‐MYC with HDAC2 and PcG genes was also examined. The cell proliferation and differentiation were checked and shown to be dramatically decreased in c‐MYC knocked‐down human umbilical cord blood‐derived MSCs, whereas they were increased in c‐MYC overexpressing cells. Similarly, RT‐PCR and Western blotting results revealed that HDAC2 expression was decreased in c‐MYC knocked‐down and increased in c‐MYC overexpressing hMSCs. Database indicates presence of c‐MYC binding motif in HDAC2 promoter region, which was confirmed by chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. The influence of c‐MYC and HDAC2 on PcG expression was confirmed. This might indicate the regulatory role of c‐MYC over HDAC2 and PcG genes. c‐MYCs’ regulatory role over HDAC2 was also confirmed in human adipose tissue‐derived MSCs and bone‐marrow derived MSCs. From this finding, it can be concluded that c‐MYC plays a vital role in cell proliferation and differentiation via chromosomal modification.     

Cdc5L interacts with ATR and is required for the S‐phase cell‐cycle checkpoint

Cell division cycle 5‐like protein (Cdc5L) is a core component of the putative E3 ubiquitin ligase complex containing Prp19/Pso4, Plrg1 and Spf27. This complex has been shown to have a role in pre‐messenger RNA splicing from yeast to humans; however, more recent studies have described a function for this complex in the cellular response to DNA damage. Here, we show that Cdc5L interacts physically with the cell‐cycle checkpoint kinase ataxia‐telangiectasia and Rad3‐related (ATR). Depletion of Cdc5L by RNA‐mediated interference methods results in a defective S‐phase cell‐cycle checkpoint and cellular sensitivity in response to replication‐fork blocking agents. Furthermore, we show that Cdc5L is required for the activation of downstream effectors or mediators of ATR checkpoint function such as checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1), cell cycle checkpoint protein Rad 17 (Rad17) and Fanconi anaemia complementation group D2 protein (FancD2). In addition, we have mapped the ATR‐binding region in Cdc5L and show that a deletion mutant that is unable to interact with ATR is defective in the rescue of the checkpoint deficiency in Cdc5L‐depleted cells. These findings show a new function for Cdc5L in the regulation of the ATR‐mediated cell‐cycle checkpoint in response to genotoxic agents.     

Polycomb group mutants exhibit mitotic defects in syncytial cell cycles of Drosophila embryos

The Polycomb Group (PcG) of epigenetic regulators maintains the repressed state of Hox genes during development of Drosophila, thereby maintaining the correct patterning of the anteroposterior axis. PcG-mediated inheritance of gene expression patterns must be stable to mitosis to ensure faithful transmission of repressed Hox states during cell division. Previously, two PcG mutants, polyhomeotic and Enhancer of zeste, were shown to exhibit mitotic segregation defects in embryos, and condensation defects in imaginal discs, respectively. We show that polyhomeotic(proximal) but not polyhomeotic(distal) is necessary for mitosis. To test if other PcG genes have roles in mitosis, we examined embryos derived from heterozygous PcG mutant females for mitotic defects. Severe defects in sister chromatid segregation and nuclear fallout, but not condensation are exhibited by Polycomb, Posterior sex combs and Additional sex combs. By contrast, mutations in Enhancer of zeste (which encodes the histone methyltransferase subunit of the Polycomb Repressive Complex 2) exhibit condensation but not segregation defects. We propose that these mitotic defects in PcG mutants delay cell cycle progression. We discuss possible mitotic roles for PcG proteins, and suggest that delays in cell cycle progression might lead to failure of maintenance.     

The role of Polycomb Group Proteins in Cell Cycle Regulation During Development

Polycomb group (PcG) and trithorax group (trxG) proteins are evolutionarilyconserved chromatin modifiers that have well known roles in the maintenance ofsilent and active expression states of homeotic genes. PcG proteins may also beinvolved in the control of cellular proliferation, as several PcG complexes have beenshown to act either as proto-oncogenes or as tumor suppressors in vertebrates. InDrosophila, PcG factors associate with specific DNA regions termed PcG responseelements (PREs), and a PRE was recently identified in the gene encoding Cyclin A.Still, it is not yet clear how PcG complexes could control cell cycle progression.Beyond acting as stable silencers of cell cycle genes during the differentiationprocess, PcG complexes might also be integrators and/or modulators of cell cyclecheckpoints in dividing cells. Here, we discuss this dual aspect of PcG involvement inepigenetic cell cycle control.     

The RNA helicase,eIF4A‐1, is required for ovule development and cell size homeostasis in Arabidopsis

eIF4A is a highly conserved RNA‐stimulated ATPase and helicase involved in the initiation of mRNA translation. The Arabidopsis genome encodes two isoforms, one of which (eIF4A‐1) is required for the coordination between cell cycle progression and cell size. A T‐DNA mutant eif4a1 line, with reduced eIF4A protein levels, displays slow growth, reduced lateral root formation, delayed flowering and abnormal ovule development. Loss of eIF4A‐1 reduces the proportion of mitotic cells in the root meristem and perturbs the relationship between cell size and cell cycle progression. Several cell cycle reporter proteins, particularly those expressed at G2/M, have reduced expression in eif4a1 mutant meristems. Single eif4a1 mutants are semisterile and show aberrant ovule growth, whereas double eif4a1 eif4a2 homozygous mutants could not be recovered, indicating that eIF4A function is essential for plant growth and development.     

Hijacking of the nucleolar protein fibrillarin by TGB1 is required for cell‐to‐cell movement of Barley stripe mosaic virus

Barley stripe mosaic virus (BSMV) Triple Gene Block1 (TGB1) is a multifunctional movement protein with RNA‐binding, ATPase and helicase activities which mainly localizes to the plasmodesmata (PD) in infected cells. Here, we show that TGB1 localizes to the nucleus and the nucleolus, as well as the cytoplasm, and that TGB1 nuclear‐cytoplasmic trafficking is required for BSMV cell‐to‐cell movement. Prediction analyses and laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM) experiments verified that TGB1 possesses a nucleolar localization signal (NoLS) (amino acids 95–104) and a nuclear localization signal (NLS) (amino acids 227–238). NoLS mutations reduced BSMV cell‐to‐cell movement significantly, whereas NLS mutations almost completely abolished movement. Furthermore, neither the NoLS nor NLS mutant viruses could infect Nicotiana benthamiana systemically, although the NoLS mutant virus was able to establish systemic infections of barley. Protein interaction experiments demonstrated that TGB1 interacts directly with the glycine–arginine‐rich (GAR) domain of the nucleolar protein fibrillarin (Fib2). Moreover, in BSMV‐infected cells, Fib2 accumulation increased by about 60%–70% and co‐localized with TGB1 in the plasmodesmata. In addition, BSMV cell‐to‐cell movement in fib2 knockdown transgenic plants was reduced to less than one‐third of that of non‐transgenic plants. Fib2 also co‐localized with both TGB1 and BSMV RNA, which are the main components of the ribonucleoprotein (RNP) movement complex. Collectively, these results show that TGB1–Fib2 interactions play a direct role in cell‐to‐cell movement, and we propose that Fib2 is hijacked by BSMV TGB1 to form a BSMV RNP which functions in cell‐to‐cell movement.