A 12‐Week Aerobic Exercise Program Reduces Hepatic Fat Accumulation and Insulin Resistance in Obese,Hispanic Adolescents

The rise in obesity‐related morbidity in children and adolescents requires urgent prevention and treatment strategies. Currently, only limited data are available on the effects of exercise programs on insulin resistance, and visceral, hepatic, and intramyocellular fat accumulation. We hypothesized that a 12‐week controlled aerobic exercise program without weight loss reduces visceral, hepatic, and intramyocellular fat content and decreases insulin resistance in sedentary Hispanic adolescents. Twenty‐nine postpubertal (Tanner stage IV and V), Hispanic adolescents, 15 obese (7 boys, 8 girls; 15.6 ± 0.4 years; 33.7 ± 1.1 kg/m²; 38.3 ± 1.5% body fat) and 14 lean (10 boys, 4 girls; 15.1 ± 0.3 years; 20.6 ± 0.8 kg/m²; 18.9 ± 1.5% body fat), completed a 12‐week aerobic exercise program (4 × 30 min/week at ≥70% of peak oxygen consumption (VO₂peak)). Measurements of cardiovascular fitness, visceral, hepatic, and intramyocellular fat content (magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)), and insulin resistance were obtained at baseline and postexercise. In both groups, fitness increased (obese: 13 ± 2%, lean: 16 ± 4%; both P < 0.01). In obese participants, intramyocellular fat remained unchanged, whereas hepatic fat content decreased from 8.9 ± 3.2 to 5.6 ± 1.8%; P < 0.05 and visceral fat content from 54.7 ± 6.0 to 49.6 ± 5.5 cm²; P < 0.05. Insulin resistance decreased indicated by decreased fasting insulin (21.8 ± 2.7 to 18.2 ± 2.4 µU/ml; P < 0.01) and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA_IR) (4.9 ± 0.7 to 4.1 ± 0.6; P < 0.01). The decrease in visceral fat correlated with the decrease in fasting insulin (R² = 0.40; P < 0.05). No significant changes were observed in any parameter in lean participants except a small increase in lean body mass (LBM). Thus, a controlled aerobic exercise program, without weight loss, reduced hepatic and visceral fat accumulation, and decreased insulin resistance in obese adolescents.     

Association of Pericardial Fat With Liver Fat and Insulin Sensitivity After Diet‐Induced Weight Loss in Overweight Women

Pericardial adipose tissue (PAT) is positively associated with fatty liver and obesity‐related insulin resistance. Because PAT is a well‐known marker of visceral adiposity, we investigated the impact of weight loss on PAT and its relationship with liver fat and insulin sensitivity independently of body fat distribution. Thirty overweight nondiabetic women (BMI 28.2–46.8 kg/m², 22–41 years) followed a 14.2 ± 4‐weeks low‐calorie diet. PAT, abdominal subcutaneous (SAT), and visceral fat volumes (VAT) were measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), total fat mass, trunk, and leg fat by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry and intrahepatocellular lipids (IHCL) by (¹)H‐magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp (M) and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA_IR) were used to assess insulin sensitivity or insulin resistance. At baseline, PAT correlated with VAT (r = 0.82; P < 0.001), IHCL (r = 0.46), HOMA_IR (r = 0.46), and M value (r = ?0.40; all P < 0.05). During intervention, body weight decreased by ?8.5%, accompanied by decreases of ?12% PAT, ?13% VAT, ?44% IHCL, ?10% HOMA2‐%B, and +24% as well as +15% increases in HOMA2‐%S and M, respectively. Decreases in PAT were only correlated with baseline PAT and the loss in VAT (r = ?0.56; P < 0.01; r = 0.42; P < 0.05) but no associations with liver fat or indexes of insulin sensitivity were observed. Improvements in HOMA_IR and HOMA2‐%B were only related to the decrease in IHCL (r = 0.62, P < 0.01; r = 0.65, P = 0.002) and decreases in IHCL only correlated with the decrease in VAT (r = 0.61, P = 0.004). In conclusion, cross‐sectionally PAT is correlated with VAT, liver fat, and insulin resistance. Longitudinally, the association between PAT and insulin resistance was lost suggesting no causal relationship between the two.     

Differential Effects of Abdominal Adipose Tissue Distribution on Insulin Sensitivity in Black and White South African Women

Black South African women are more insulin resistant than BMI‐matched white women. The objective of the study was to characterize the determinants of insulin sensitivity in black and white South African women matched for BMI. A total of 57 normal‐weight (BMI 18–25 kg/m²) and obese (BMI > 30 kg/m²) black and white premenopausal South African women underwent the following measurements: body composition (dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry), body fat distribution (computerized tomography (CT)), insulin sensitivity (S_I, frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test), dietary intake (food frequency questionnaire), physical activity (Global Physical Activity Questionnaire), and socioeconomic status (SES, demographic questionnaire). Black women were less insulin sensitive (4.4 ± 0.8 vs. 9.5 ± 0.8 and 3.0 ± 0.8 vs. 6.0 ± 0.8 × 10^?5/min/(pmol/l), for normal‐weight and obese women, respectively, P < 0.001), but had less visceral adipose tissue (VAT) (P = 0.051), more abdominal superficial subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) (P = 0.003), lower SES (P < 0.001), and higher dietary fat intake (P = 0.001) than white women matched for BMI. S_I correlated with deep and superficial SAT in both black (R = ?0.594, P = 0.002 and R = 0.495, P = 0.012) and white women (R = ?0.554, P = 0.005 and R = ?0.546, P = 0.004), but with VAT in white women only (R = ?0.534, P = 0.005). In conclusion, body fat distribution is differentially associated with insulin sensitivity in black and white women. Therefore, the different abdominal fat depots may have varying metabolic consequences in women of different ethnic origins.     

Both Subcutaneous and Visceral Adipose Tissue Correlate Highly with Insulin Resistance in African Americans

Objective: The contribution of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) to insulin resistance is well‐established; however, the role of subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue (SAT) in insulin resistance remains controversial. Sex may determine which of these two components of abdominal obesity is more strongly related to insulin resistance and its consequences. The aim of this study was to determine whether both VAT and SAT contribute to insulin resistance in African Americans and to examine the effects of sex on this relationship. Research Methods and Procedures: This was a cross‐sectional study of 78 nondiabetic African‐American volunteers (44 men, 35 women; age 33.8 ± 7.3 years; BMI 30.9 ± 7.4 kg/m²). VAT and SAT volumes were measured using serial computerized tomography slices from the dome of the diaphragm to the iliac crest. The insulin sensitivity index (S_I) was determined from the minimal model using data obtained from the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. Results: In men, both VAT and SAT were negatively correlated with S_I (r for both correlations = ?0.57; p < 0.01). In women, the correlation coefficient between VAT and S_I was ?0.50 (p < 0.01) and between SAT and S_I was ?0.67 (p < 0.01). In women, the correlation coefficient for S_I with SAT was significantly greater than the correlation coefficient with VAT (p = 0.02). Discussion: Both SAT and VAT are strongly correlated with insulin resistance in African Americans. For African‐American women, SAT may have a greater effect than VAT on insulin resistance.     

Insulin Action,Regional Fat,and Myocyte Lipid: Altered Relationships with Increased Adiposity

Objective: Abdominal fat and myocyte triglyceride levels relate negatively to insulin sensitivity, but their interrelationships are inadequately characterized in the overweight. Using recent methods for measuring intramyocyte triglyceride, these relationships were studied in men with a broad range of adiposity. Research Methods and Procedures: Myocyte triglyceride content (¹H‐magnetic resonance spectroscopy of soleus and tibialis anterior muscles and biochemical assessment of vastus lateralis biopsies), regional fat distribution (DXA and abdominal magnetic resonance imaging), serum lipids, insulin action (euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp), and substrate oxidation rates (indirect calorimetry) were measured in 39 nondiabetic men (35.1 ± 7.8 years) with a broad range of adiposity (BMI 28.6 ± 4.1 kg/m², range 20.1 to 37.6 kg/m²). Results: Relationships between insulin‐stimulated glucose disposal and regional body fat depots appeared more appropriately described by nonlinear than linear models. When the group was subdivided using median total body fat as the cut‐point, insulin‐stimulated glucose disposal correlated negatively to all regional body fat measures (all p ≤ 0.004), serum triglycerides and free fatty acids (p < 0.02), and both soleus intramyocellular lipid (p = 0.003) and vastus lateralis triglyceride (p = 0.04) in the normal/less overweight group. In contrast, only visceral abdominal fat showed significant negative correlation with insulin‐stimulated glucose disposal in more overweight men (r = ?0.576, p = 0.01), some of whom surprisingly had lower than expected myocyte lipid levels. These findings persisted when the group was subdivided using different cut‐points or measures of adiposity. Discussion: Interrelationships among body fat depots, myocyte triglyceride, serum lipids, and insulin action are generally absent with increased adiposity. However, visceral abdominal fat, which corresponds less closely to total adiposity, remains an important predictor of insulin resistance in men with both normal and increased adiposity.     

Adiponectin Levels during Low‐ and High‐Fat Eucaloric Diets in Lean and Obese Women

Objective: Adiponectin influences insulin sensitivity (S_I) and fat oxidation. Little is known about changes in adiponectin with changes in the fat content of eucaloric diets. We hypothesized that dietary fat content may influence adiponectin according to an individual's S_I. Research Methods and Procedures: We measured changes in adiponectin, insulin, glucose, and leptin in response to high‐fat (HF) and low‐fat (LF) eucaloric diets in lean (n = 10) and obese (n = 11) subjects. Obese subjects were further subdivided in relation to a priori S_I. Results: We found significantly higher insulin, glucose, and leptin and lower adiponectin in obese vs. lean subjects during both HF and LF. The mean group values of these measurements, including adiponectin (lean, HF 21.9 ± 9.8; LF, 20.8 ± 6.6; obese, HF 10.0 ± 3.3; LF, 9.5 ± 2.3 ng/mL; mean ± SD), did not significantly change between HF and LF diets. However, within the obese group, the insulin‐sensitive subjects had significantly higher adiponectin during HF than did the insulin‐resistant subjects. Additionally, the change in adiponectin from LF to HF diet correlated positively with the obese subjects’ baseline S_I. Discussion: Although in lean and obese women, group mean values for adiponectin did not change significantly with a change in fat content of a eucaloric diet, a priori measured S_I in obese subjects predicted an increase in adiponectin during the HF diet; this may be a mechanism that preserves S_I in an already obese group.     

The Visceral Adiposity Syndrome in Japanese-American Men

Japanese-Americans have an increased prevalence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease when compared to native Japanese. This increase has been associated with fasting hyperinsulinemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and low plasma levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship of both visceral adiposity and insulin resistance to this metabolic syndrome and to the presence of a predominance of small, dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles (LDL subclass phenotype B) that has been associated with increased atherogenic risk. Six Japanese-American men with non-insulin-dependent diabetes, each receiving an oral sulfonylurea, were selected. One or 2 nondiabetic Japanese-American men, matched by age and body mass index, were selected for each diabetic subject, giving a total of 9 nondiabetic men. Diabetic subjects had significantly higher fasting plasma glucose (p=0.0007) and lower insulin sensitivity (S_I, p=0.018) using the minimal model technique than nondiabetic subjects matched for body mass index. Six men (2 with diabetes) had LDL phenotype A and 8 (4 with diabetes) had phenotype B. One nondiabetic subject had an intermediate low-density lipoprotein pattern. Significantly greater amounts of intra-abdominal fat (p=0.045) measured by computed tomography were found in the men with phenotype B while fasting insulin (p=0.070) and triglycerides (p=0.051) tended to be higher. Intra-abdominal fat was significantly correlated with S_I (r=-0.559), plasma triglycerides (r=0.541), plasma free fatty acids (r=0.677), LDL density (relative flotation rate, r=-0.803), and plasma HDL-cholesterol (r=-0.717). S_I was significantly correlated only with plasma free fatty acids (r=-0.546) and tended to be correlated with hepatic lipase activity (r=-0.512, p=0.061). In conclusion, these observations indicate that in non-obese Japanese-American men, the metabolic features of the so-called insulin resistance syndrome, including LDL phenotype B, are more strongly correlated with visceral adiposity than with S_I. It may therefore be more appropriate to call this the visceral adiposity syndrome. Although questions concerning mechanisms still remain, we postulate that visceral adiposity plays a central role in the development of many of the metabolic abnormalities, including LDL subclass phenotype B, that occur in this metabolic syndrome.     

Effect of Rosiglitazone on Insulin Sensitivity and Body Composition in Type 2 Diabetic Patients

Objective: To investigate the effects of rosiglitazone (RSG) on insulin sensitivity and regional adiposity (including intrahepatic fat) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Research Methods and Procedures: We examined the effect of RSG (8 mg/day, 2 divided doses) compared with placebo on insulin sensitivity and body composition in 33 type 2 diabetic patients. Measurements of insulin sensitivity (euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp), body fat (abdominal magnetic resonance imaging and DXA), and liver fat (magnetic resonance spectroscopy) were taken at baseline and repeated after 16 weeks of treatment. Results: There was a significant improvement in glycemic control (glycosylated hemoglobin −0.7 ± 0.7%, p ≤ 0.05) and an 86% increase in insulin sensitivity in the RSG group (glucose-disposal rate change from baseline: 17.5 ± 14.5 μmol glucose/min/kg free fat mass, p < 0.05), but no significant change in the placebo group compared with baseline. Total body weight and fat mass increased (p ≤ 0.05) with RSG (2.1 ± 2.0 kg and 1.4 ± 1.6 kg, respectively) with 95% of the increase in adiposity occurring in nonabdominal regions. In the abdominal region, RSG increased subcutaneous fat area by 8% (25.0 ± 28.7 cm², p = 0.02), did not alter intra-abdominal fat area, and reduced intrahepatic fat levels by 45% (−6.7 ± 9.7%, concentration relative to water). Discussion: Our data indicate that RSG greatly improves insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes and is associated with an increase in adiposity in subcutaneous but not visceral body regions.     

Adiposity and β‐Cell Function: Relationships Differ With Ethnicity and Age

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes is higher among African Americans (AA) vs. European Americans (EA), is highest at middle age, and is related to obesity. This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that the association of adiposity (percent body fat (%fat)) with indexes of insulin sensitivity (S_I) and β‐cell function would differ with ethnicity and age. Subjects were 168 healthy, normoglycemic AA and EA girls and women aged 7–12 years, 18–32 years, and 40–70 years. An intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) was used to assess indexes of insulin secretion and action: S_I, acute C‐peptide secretion (X0); basal, first‐phase, second‐phase, and total β‐cell responsivity to glucose (PhiB, Phi1, Phi2, and Phi_TOT, respectively); and the disposition index (DI = S_I × Phi_TOT). %Fat was assessed with dual energy X‐ray absorptiometrys. Adiposity was significantly associated with S_I among EA (?0.57, P < 0.001) but not AA (?0.20, P = 0.09). Adiposity appeared stimulatory to β‐cell function in the two groups of younger subjects and in EA, but inhibitory in postmenopausal women, particularly AA postmenopausal women. Among AA postmenopausal women, %fat was inversely associated with Phi1 (r = ?0.57, P < 0.05) and Phi_TOT (r = ?0.68, P < 0.01). These results suggest that the impact of adiposity on insulin secretion and action differs with age and ethnicity.     

Pleiotropic Effects of Genes for Insulin Resistance on Adiposity in Baboons

Objective: Previous research has suggested a genetic contribution to the development of insulin resistance and obesity. We hypothesized that the same genes influencing insulin resistance might also contribute to the variation in adiposity. Research Methods and Procedures: A total of 601 (200 male, 401 female) adult baboons (Papio hamadryas) from nine families with pedigrees ranging in size from 43 to 121 were used in this study. Plasma insulin, glucose, C‐peptide, and adiponectin were analyzed, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA IR) was calculated. Fat biopsies were collected from omental fat tissue, and triglyceride concentration per gram of fat tissue was determined. Body weight and length were measured, and BMI was derived. Univariate and bivariate quantitative genetic analyses were performed using SOLAR. Results: Insulin, glucose, C‐peptide, and adiponectin levels, HOMA IR, triglyceride concentration of fat tissue, body weight, and BMI were all found to be significantly heritable, with heritabilities ranging from 0.15 to 0.80. Positive genetic correlations (r_Gs) were observed for HOMA IR with C‐peptide (r_G = 0.88 ± 0.10, p = 0.01), triglyceride concentration in fat tissue (r_G = 0.86 ± 0.33, p = 0.02), weight (r_G = 0.50 ± 0.20, p = 0.03), and BMI (r_G = 0.64 ± 0.22, p = 0.02). Discussion: These results suggest that a set of genes contributing to insulin resistance also influence general and central adiposity phenotypes. Further genetic research in a larger sample size is needed to identify the common genes that constitute the genetic basis for the development of insulin resistance and obesity.     

Increased Whole‐Body Adiposity Without a Concomitant Increase in Liver Fat is Not Associated With Augmented Metabolic Dysfunction

Aim of this study was to determine whether an increase in adiposity, without a concomitant increase in intrahepatic triglyceride (IHTG) content, is associated with a deterioration in metabolic function. To this end, multiorgan insulin sensitivity, assessed by using a two‐stage hyperinsulinemic–euglycemic clamp procedure in conjunction with stable isotopically labeled tracer infusion, and very low‐density lipoprotein (VLDL) kinetics, assessed by using stable isotopically labeled tracer infusion and mathematical modeling, were determined in 10 subjects with class I obesity (BMI: 31.6 ± 0.3 kg/m²; 37 ± 2% body fat; visceral adipose tissue (VAT): 1,225 ± 144 cm³) and 10 subjects with class III obesity (BMI: 41.5 ± 0.5 kg/m²; 43 ± 2% body fat; VAT: 2,121 ± 378 cm³), matched on age, sex, and IHTG content (14 ± 4 and 14 ± 3%, respectively). No differences between class I and class III obese groups were detected in insulin‐mediated suppression of palmitate (67 ± 3 and 65 ± 3%, respectively; P = 0.635) and glucose (67 ± 3 and 73 ± 5%, respectively; P = 0.348) rates of appearance in plasma, and the insulin‐mediated increase in glucose disposal (218 ± 18 and 193 ± 30%, respectively; P = 0.489). In addition, no differences between class I and class III obese groups were detected in secretion rates of VLDL‐triglyceride (6.5 ± 1.0 and 6.0 ± 1.4 µmol/l·min, respectively; P = 0.787) and VLDL‐apolipoprotein B‐100 (0.40 ± 0.05 and 0.41 ± 0.04 nmol/l·min, respectively; P = 0.866), and plasma clearance rates of VLDL‐triglyceride (31 (16–59) and 29 (18–46) ml/min, respectively; P = 0.888) and VLDL‐apolipoprotein B‐100 (15 (11–19) and 17 (11–25) ml/min, respectively; P = 0.608). We conclude that increased adiposity without a concomitant increase in IHTG content does not cause additional abnormalities in adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, and hepatic insulin sensitivity, or VLDL metabolism.     

Correlation between Serum Resistin Level and Adiposity in Obese Individuals

Objective: Resistin is associated with insulin resistance in mice and may play a similar role in humans. The aim of our study was to examine the relationship of serum resistin level to body composition, insulin resistance, and related obesity phenotypes in humans. Research Methods and Procedures: Sixty‐four young (age 32 ± 10 years), obese (BMI 32.9 ± 5.6), nondiabetic subjects taking no medication, and 15 lean (BMI 21.1 ± 1.3) volunteers were studied cross‐sectionally. Thirty‐five of the subjects were also reevaluated after 1.5 years on a weight reduction program entailing dieting and exercise; changes of serum resistin were compared with changes of BMI, body composition, fat distribution, and several indices of insulin sensitivity derived from plasma glucose and serum insulin levels measured during 75‐g oral glucose tolerance test. Results: In a cross‐sectional analysis, serum resistin was significantly higher in obese subjects than in lean volunteers (24.58 ± 12.93 ng/mL; n = 64 vs. 12.83 ± 8.30 ng/mL; n = 15; p < 0.01), and there was a correlation between resistin level and BMI, when the two groups were combined (ρ = 0.35, p < 0.01). Although cross‐sectional analysis in obese subjects revealed no correlation between serum resistin and parameters related to adiposity or insulin resistance, longitudinal analysis revealed change in serum resistin to be positively correlated with changes in BMI, body fat, fat mass, visceral fat area, and mean glucose and insulin (ρ = 0.39, 0.40, 0.44, 0.50, 0.40, and 0.50; p = 0.02, 0.03, 0.02, <0.01, 0.02, and <0.01, respectively). Discussion: Resistin appears to be related to human adiposity and to be a possible candidate factor in human insulin resistance.     

Visceral obesity is a negative predictor of remission of diabetes 1 year after bariatric surgery

Our aim was to identify preoperative anthropometric and clinical parameters that predict the remission of diabetes after Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Fifty severely obese Korean patients with type 2 diabetes underwent RYGB. Visceral and abdominal subcutaneous fat area (SFA) was assessed using computed tomography before and 6 and 12 months after RYGB. Remission was defined as a glycated hemoglobin (A_1C) level <6.5% and a fasting glucose concentration <126 mg/dl for 1 year or more without the use of medication. The visceral‐to‐SFA ratio decreased from 0.60 ± 0.30 to 0.53 ± 0.29 (P = 0.001) after 6 months and decreased further to 0.42 ± 0.24 (P < 0.001) after 12 months. Thirty‐four of the 50 patients (68%) had remission of diabetes (remission group). Compared with patients in the nonremission group, patients in the remission group had a shorter duration of diabetes and lower preoperative A_1C level, and were less likely to use insulin preoperatively. Preoperative BMI did not differ in two groups. However, the preoperative visceral‐to‐SFA ratio was greater in the nonremission group compared with the remission group (0.79 ± 0.29 vs. 0.53 ± 0.26, P = 0.003). Finally, the preoperative visceral‐to‐SFA ratio was an independent predictor of the remission of diabetes after RYGB in multiple stepwise logistic regression analysis. In conclusion, our data suggest that visceral adiposity negatively influence the likelihood of the patient experiencing the remission of diabetes after RYGB.     

Variant in the 3′ Region of the IκBα Gene Associated With Insulin Resistance in Hispanic Americans: The IRAS Family Study

The IKKβ/NF‐κB pathway is known to play an important role in inflammatory response and has also recently been implicated in the process of insulin resistance. We hypothesized that one or more variants in the IκBα gene (NFKBIA) or surrounding untranslated regions would be associated with insulin sensitivity (S_I) in Hispanic‐American families. We tested for association between 25 single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in and near NFKBIA and S_I in 981 individuals in 90 Hispanic‐American families from the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis (IRAS) Family Study. SNP rs1951276 in the 3′ flanking region of NFKBIA was associated with S_I in the San Antonio (SA) sample after adjusting for age, gender, and admixture (uncorrected P = 1.69 × 10^?5; conservative Bonferroni correction P = 3.38 × 10^?4). Subjects with at least one A allele for NFKBIA rs1951276 had ～29% lower S_I compared to individuals homozygous for the G allele in the SA sample. Although not statistically significant, the effect was in the same direction in the San Luis Valley (SLV) sample alone (P = 0.348) and was significant in the combined SA and SLV samples (P = 5.37 × 10^?4; presence of A allele associated with ～20% lower S_I). In SA, when adjusted for subcutaneous adipose tissue area (SAT, cm²), the association was modestly attenuated (P = 1.25 × 10^?3), but the association remained highly significant after adjustment for visceral adipose tissue area (VAT, cm²; P = 4.41 × 10^?6). These results provide corroborating evidence that the NF‐κB/IKKβ pathway may mediate obesity‐induced insulin resistance in humans.     

Circulating IL-6 concentrations and abdominal adipocyte isoproterenol-stimulated lipolysis in women

Objective: To examine the association of plasma interleukin‐6 (IL‐6) concentrations with adiposity and fat cell metabolism in women. Methods and Procedures: Omental (OM) and subcutaneous (SC) adipose tissue samples were obtained from 48 healthy women (age: 47 ± 5 years, BMI: 26.9 ± 5.3 kg/m²) undergoing gynecological surgeries. Total and visceral adiposity were assessed by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry and computed tomography, respectively. Measures of adipocyte lipolysis (basal, isoproterenol‐, forskolin‐, and cyclic dibutyryl‐adenosine monophosphate (AMP)‐stimulated) and adipose tissue lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity were obtained. Plasma IL‐6 was measured by radioimmunoassay. Results: Plasma IL‐6 was positively correlated with total body fat mass (r = 0.32, P < 0.05), SC adipose tissue area (r = 0.35, P < 0.05), SC adipocyte diameter (r = 0.30, P < 0.05), and a trend was observed with visceral adipose tissue area (r = 0.20, P < 0.07). Plasma IL‐6 was positively correlated with glycerol released in response to isoproterenol (10^?5 to 10^?8 mol/l) by isolated SC (0.31 ≤ r ≤ 0.65, P < 0.05) and OM (0.36 ≤ r ≤ 0.40, P < 0.02) adipocytes, independent of menopausal status. No correlation was found with LPL activity. A subsample of women with high plasma IL‐6 (n = 10) was matched with women with low plasma IL‐6 (n = 10) for total body fat mass. OM adipocyte glycerol release in response to isoproterenol (10^?5 to 10^?8 mol/l) was higher in the subsample of women with elevated plasma IL‐6 (P ≤ 0.07). Discussion: We observed that OM lipolysis was significantly higher in women with elevated plasma IL‐6 for a similar body fat mass and menopausal status. These results suggest that higher circulating IL‐6 concentrations are associated with increased isoproterenol‐stimulated lipolysis especially in OM abdominal adipocytes in women.     

Increased Susceptibility to Insulin Resistance Associated with Abdominal Obesity in Aging Rats**

Objective: Recent data have suggested that the insulin resistance observed with aging may be more related to adiposity than aging per se. We asked whether the insulin resistance observed in aged rats was comparable (both in magnitude and location) to that of fat‐fed rats. Research Methods and Procedures: We performed hyperinsulinemic (5 mU/min per kg) euglycemic clamps with tracer in conscious, 6‐hour fasted young (YL), fat‐fed young (YF), fat‐fed old (OF), and calorically restricted old (OL) rats. Results: Intraabdominal fat measurements showed that OF and YF rats were more obese than YL (p ≤ 0.001; YF > OF > YL). Caloric restriction not only prevented age‐related obesity but also reduced the ratio of intraabdominal fat to lean body mass (LBM) compared with YL (OL: 0.59 ± 0.05 vs. YL: 1.07 ± 0.04; p = 0.017). Despite similar incremental insulin, YF and OF rats required 40% less infused glucose to maintain euglycemia than YL and OL rats (p < 0.001). Insulin‐stimulated glucose uptake (Si_Rd: ΔRd/(ΔInsulin × Glucose_SS) was impaired in OF rats (OF: 14.03 ± 1.79 vs. YL: 23.08 ± 1.87 × 10³ dL/min × kg LBM per pM; p = 0.004) and improved in OL rats (29.41 ± 1.84 × 10³ dL/min × kg LBM per pM; p = 0.031) compared with YL. Despite greater obesity, YF rats did not exhibit lower Si_Rd compared with OF rats (p = 0.58). In contrast, the ability of insulin to suppress endogenous glucose production (EGP; Si_EGP: ΔEGP/(ΔInsulin × Glucose_SS) was not impaired in OF rats (OF vs. YL; p = 0.61) but was markedly impaired in YF rats by ～75% (1.72 ± 0.66 × 10³ dL/min × kg per pM; p = 0.013). Surprisingly, separate regression analysis for old and young animals revealed that old rats exhibited a significantly steeper regression between Si (Rd and EGP) and adiposity than young rats (p < 0.05). Thus, older rats showed a proportionately greater decrement in insulin sensitivity with an equivalent increase in adiposity. Discussion: These data suggest that, in rodents, youth affords significant protection against obesity‐induced insulin resistance.     

High‐normal tsh values in obesity: Is it insulin resistance or adipose tissue's guilt?

Objective:

Clinical evidences reported subclinical alterations of thyroid function in obesity, although the relationship between thyroid status and obesity remains unclear. We cross‐sectionally investigated the influence of metabolic features on hypothalamic–pituitary–thyroid axis in obesity.

Design and Methods:

We enrolled 60 euthyroid subjects with no history of type 2 diabetes mellitus and assessed the relationship of thyroid function with insulin resistance, measured using euglycemic clamp, and abdominal fat volume, quantified by computed tomography scan (CT scan). Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) correlated with BMI (r = 0.46; P = 0.02), both visceral (r = 0.58; P = 0.02) and subcutaneous adipose tissue volumes (r = 0.43; P = 0.03) and insulin resistance (inverse relationship with insulin sensitivity–glucose uptake: r = ?0.40; P = 0.04).

Results:

After performing multivariate regression, visceral adipose tissue volume was found to be the most powerful predictor of TSH (β = 3.05; P = 0.01), whereas glucose uptake, high‐density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, subcutaneous adipose tissue volume, and triglycerides were not. To further confirm the hypothesis that high‐normal TSH values could be dependent on adipose tissue, and not on insulin resistance, we restricted our analyses to moderately obese subjects' BMI ranging 30‐35 kg/m². This subgroup was then divided as insulin resistant and insulin sensitive according to the glucose uptake (≤ or >5 mg·kg^?1·min^?1, respectively). We did not find any statistical difference in TSH (insulin resistant: 1.62 ± 0.65 µU/ml vs. insulin sensitive: 1.46 ± 0.48; P = not significant) and BMI (insulin resistant: 32.2 ± 1.6 kg/m² vs. insulin sensitive: 32.4 ± 1.4; P = not significant), thus confirming absence of correlation between thyroid function and insulin sensitivity per se.

Conclusion:

Our study suggests that the increase in visceral adipose tissue is the best predictor of TSH concentration in obesity, independently from the eventual concurrent presence of insulin resistance.

     

Glucose Metabolism and Diet Predict Changes in Adiposity and Fat Distribution in Weight‐reduced Women

Among obesity‐prone individuals, metabolic state may interact with diet in determining body composition. We tested the hypotheses that, among 103 weight‐reduced women over 1 year, (i) insulin sensitivity would be positively associated with change in %fat; (ii) this association would be modulated by dietary glycemic load (GL); and (iii) changes in fat distribution would be related to indexes of glucose metabolism. Insulin sensitivity, glucose effectiveness, fasting and postchallenge insulin and glucose, and glucose tolerance were assessed during intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT). Changes in %fat and fat distribution were examined using dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry and computed tomography. Dietary GL was assessed on 67 women using food records. On average, women showed a +5.3 ± 3.0% change in %fat over 1 year, with the magnitude of this change being greater in relatively insulin sensitive women (+6.0 ± 0.4%, mean ± s.e.m.) than in relatively insulin resistant women (+4.4 ± 0.4 kg; P < 0.05). Women who were relatively insulin sensitive and who consumed a higher GL diet showed a +6.8 ± 0.7% change in %fat, which was greater than those who were less insulin sensitive, regardless of diet (P < 0.05), but did not differ from women who were relatively insulin sensitive and who consumed a lower GL diet (P = 0.105). Changes in intra‐abdominal and deep subcutaneous abdominal fat were inversely associated with the postchallenge decline in serum glucose. In conclusion, greater insulin sensitivity may predispose to adiposity among weight reduced women, an effect that may be ameliorated by a lower GL diet. The potential association between indexes of glucose disposal and changes in fat distribution warrants further study.     

β‐Cell Function and Insulin Sensitivity in Adolescents From an OGTT

Given the increase in the incidence of insulin resistance, obesity, and type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents, it would be of paramount importance to assess quantitative indices of insulin secretion and action during a physiological perturbation, such as a meal or an oral glucose‐tolerance test (OGTT). A minimal model method is proposed to measure quantitative indices of insulin secretion and action in adolescents from an oral test. A 7 h, 21‐sample OGTT was performed in 11 adolescents. The C‐peptide minimal model was identified on C‐peptide and glucose data to quantify indices of β‐cell function: static φ_s and dynamic φ_d responsivity to glucose from which total responsivity φ was also measured. The glucose minimal model was identified on glucose and insulin data to estimate insulin sensitivity, S_I, which was compared to a reference measure, S_I^ref, provided by a tracer method. Disposition indices, which adjust insulin secretion for insulin action, were then calculated. Indices of β‐cell function were φ_s = 51.35 ± 8.89 × 10^?9min^?1, φ_d = 1,392 ± 258 × 10^?9, and φ = 82.09 ± 17.70 × 10^?9min^?1. Insulin sensitivity was S_I = 14.19 ± 2.73 × 10^?4, not significantly different from S_I^ref = 14.96 ± 3.04 × 10^?4 dl/kg·min per µU/ml, and well correlated: r = 0.98, P < 0.0001, thus indicating that S_I can be accurately measured from an oral test. Disposition indices were DI_s = 1,040 ± 201 × 10^?14 dl/kg/min² per pmol/l, DI_d = 33,178 ± 10,720 × 10^?14 dl/kg/min per pmol/l, DI = 1,844 ± 522 × 10^?14 dl/kg/min² per pmol/l. Virtually the same minimal model assessment was obtained with a reduced 3 h, 9‐sample protocol. OGTT interpreted with C‐peptide and glucose minimal model has the potential to provide novel insight regarding the regulation of glucose metabolism in adolescents, and to evaluate the effect of obesity and interventions such as diet and exercise.