miR‐134 inhibits non‐small cell lung cancer growth by targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is frequently activated in a wide range of solid tumours and represents an important therapeutic target. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have recently been recognized as a rational and potential modality for anti‐EGFR therapies. However, more EGFR‐targeting miRNAs need to be explored. In this study, we identified a novel EGFR‐targeting miRNA, miRNA‐134 (miR‐134), in non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines. Luciferase assays confirmed that EGFR is a direct target of miR‐134. In addition, the overexpression of miR‐134 inhibited EGFR‐related signaling and suppressed NSCLC cells proliferation by inducing cell cycle arrest and/or apoptosis, suggesting that miR‐134 functions as a tumour suppressor in NSCLC. Further mechanistic investigation including RNAi and rescue experiments suggested that the down‐regulation of EGFR by miR‐134 partially contributes to the antiproliferative role of miR‐134. Last, in vivo experiments demonstrated that miR‐134 suppressed tumour growth of A549 xenograft in nude mice. Taken together, our findings suggest that miR‐134 inhibits non‐small cell lung cancer growth by targeting the EGFR.     

Protein Kinase D3 promotes the cell proliferation by activating the ERK1/c‐MYC axis in breast cancer

Breast cancer is the second leading death cause of cancer death for all women. Previous study suggested that Protein Kinase D3 (PRKD3) was involved in breast cancer progression. In addition, the protein level of PRKD3 in triple‐negative breast adenocarcinoma was higher than that in normal breast tissue. However, the oncogenic mechanisms of PRKD3 in breast cancer is not fully investigated. Multi‐omic data showed that ERK1/c‐MYC axis was identified as a major pivot in PRKD3‐mediated downstream pathways. Our study provided the evidence to support that the PRKD3/ERK1/c‐MYC pathway play an important role in breast cancer progression. We found that knocking out PRKD3 by performing CRISPR/Cas9 genome engineering technology suppressed phosphorylation of both ERK1 and c‐MYC but did not down‐regulate ERK1/2 expression or phosphorylation of ERK2. The inhibition of ERK1 and c‐MYC phosphorylation further led to the lower protein level of c‐MYC and then reduced the expression of the c‐MYC target genes in breast cancer cells. We also found that loss of PRKD3 reduced the rate of the cell proliferation in vitro and tumour growth in vivo, whereas ectopic (over)expression of PRKD3, ERK1 or c‐MYC in the PRKD3‐knockout breast cells reverse the suppression of the cell proliferation and tumour growth. Collectively, our data strongly suggested that PRKD3 likely promote the cell proliferation in the breast cancer cells by activating ERK1‐c‐MYC axis.     

Deoxycholic acid activates epidermal growth factor receptor and promotes intestinal carcinogenesis by ADAM17‐dependent ligand release

High fat diet is implicated in the elevated deoxycholic acid (DCA) in the intestine and correlated with increased colon cancer risk. However, the potential mechanisms of intestinal carcinogenesis by DCA remain unclarified. Here, we investigated the carcinogenic effects and mechanisms of DCA using the intestinal tumour cells and Apc^min/+ mice model. We found that DCA could activate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and promote the release of EGFR ligand amphiregulin (AREG), but not HB‐EGF or TGF‐α in intestinal tumour cells. Moreover, ADAM‐17 was required in DCA‐induced promotion of shedding of AREG and activation of EGFR/Akt signalling pathway. DCA significantly increased the multiplicity of intestinal tumours and accelerated adenoma‐carcinoma sequence in Apc^min/+ mice. ADAM‐17/EGFR signalling axis was also activated in intestinal tumours of DCA‐treated Apc^min/+ mice, whereas no significant change occurred in tumour adjacent tissues after DCA exposure. Conclusively, DCA activated EGFR and promoted intestinal carcinogenesis by ADAM17‐dependent ligand release.     

An integrated analysis to predict micro‐RNAs targeting both stemness and metastasis in breast cancer stem cells

Several evidences support the idea that a small population of tumour cells representing self‐renewal potential are involved in initiation, maintenance, metastasis, and outcomes of cancer therapy. Elucidation of microRNAs/genes regulatory networks activated in cancer stem cells (CSCs) is necessary for the identification of new targets for cancer therapy. The aim of the present study was to predict the miRNAs pattern, which can target both metastasis and self‐renewal pathways using integration of literature and data mining. For this purpose, mammospheres derived from MCF‐7, MDA‐MB231, and MDA‐MB468 were used as breast CSCs model. They had higher migration, invasion, and colony formation potential, with increasing in stemness‐ and EMT‐related genes expression. Our results determined that miR‐204, ‐200c, ‐34a, and ‐10b contemporarily could target both self‐renewal and EMT pathways. This core regulatory of miRNAs could increase the survival rate of breast invasive carcinoma via up‐regulation of OCT4, SOX2, KLF4, c‐MYC, NOTCH1, SNAI1, ZEB1, and CDH2 and down‐regulation of CDH1. The majority of those target genes were involved in the regulation of pluripotency, MAPK, WNT, Hedgehog, p53, and transforming growth factor β pathways. Hence, this study provides novel insights for targeting core regulatory of miRNAs in breast CSCs to target both self‐renewal and metastasis potential and eradication of breast cancer.     

A novel biphenyl urea derivate inhibits the invasion of breast cancer through the modulation of CXCR4

The increased migration and invasion of breast carcinoma cells are key events in the development of metastasis to the lymph nodes and distant organs. CXCR4, the receptor for stromal‐derived factor‐1, is reportedly involved in breast carcinogenesis and invasion. In this study, we investigated a novel biphenyl urea derivate, TPD7 for its ability to affect CXCR4 expression as well as function in breast cancer cells. We demonstrated that TPD7 inhibited the breast cancer proliferation and down‐regulated the CXCR4 expression on breast cancer cells both over‐expressing and low‐expressing HER2, an oncogene known to induce the chemokine receptor. Treatments with pharmacological proteasome inhibitors partial suppressed TPD7‐induced decrease in CXCR4 expression. Real‐time PCR analysis revealed that down‐regulation of CXCR4 by TPD7 also occurred at the translational level. Inhibition of CXCR4 expression by TPD7 further correlated with the suppression of SDF‐1α‐induced migration and invasion in breast tumour cells, knockdown of CXCR4 attenuated TPD7‐inhibitory effects. In addition, TPD7 treatment significantly suppressed matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)‐2 and MMP‐9 expression, the downstream targets of CXCR4, perhaps via inactivation of the ERK signaling pathway. Overall, our results showed that TPD7 exerted its anti‐invasive effect through the down‐regulation of CXCR4 expression and thus had the potential for the treatment of breast cancer.     

Tumour cell‐intrinsic CTLA4 regulates PD‐L1 expression in non‐small cell lung cancer

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1) are immune checkpoint proteins expressed in T cells. Although CTLA4 expression was found in multiple tumours including non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues and cells, its function in tumour cells is unknown. Recently, PD‐1 was found to be expressed in melanoma cells and to promote tumorigenesis. We found that CTLA4 was expressed in a subset of NSCLC cell lines and in a subgroup of cancer cells within the lung cancer tissues. We further found that in NSCLC cells, anti‐CTLA4 antibody can induce PD‐L1 expression, which is mediated by CTLA4 and the EGFR pathway involving phosphorylation of MEK and ERK. In CTLA4 knockout cells, EGFR knockout cells or in the presence of an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, anti‐CTLA4 antibody was not able to induce PD‐L1 expression in NSCLC cells. Moreover, anti‐CTLA4 antibody promoted NSCLC cell proliferation in vitro and tumour growth in vivo in the absence of adaptive immunity. These results suggest that tumour cell‐intrinsic CTLA4 can regulate PD‐L1 expression and cell proliferation, and that anti‐CTLA4 antibody, by binding to the tumour cell‐intrinsic CTLA4, may result in the activation of the EGFR pathway in cancer cells.     

EGF signalling pathway regulates colon cancer stem cell proliferation and apoptosis

Objectives

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) compose a subpopulation of cells within a tumour that can self‐renew and proliferate. Growth factors such as epidermal growth factor (EGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (b‐FGF) promote cancer stem cell proliferation in many solid tumours. This study assesses whether EGF, bFGF and IGF signalling pathways are essential for colon CSC proliferation and self‐renewal.

Material and methods

Colon CSCs were cultured in serum‐free medium (SFM) with one of the following growth factors: EGF, bFGF or IGF. Characteristics of CSC gene expression were evaluated by real time PCR. Tumourigenicity of CSCs was determined using a xenograft model in vivo. Effects of EGF receptor inhibitors, Gefitinib and PD153035, on CSC proliferation, apoptosis and signalling were evaluated using fluorescence‐activated cell sorting and western blotting.

Results

Colon cancer cell HCT116 transformed to CSCs in SFM. Compared to other growth factors, EGF was essential to support proliferation of CSCs that expressed higher levels of progenitor genes (Musashi‐1, LGR5) and lower levels of differential genes (CK20). CSCs promoted more rapid tumour growth than regular cancer cells in xenografts. EGFR inhibitors suppressed proliferation and induced apoptosis of CSCs by inhibiting autophosphorylation of EGFR and downstream signalling proteins, such as Akt kinase, extracellular signal‐regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK 1/2).

Conclusions

This study indicates that EGF signalling was essential for formation and maintenance of colon CSCs. Inhibition of the EGF signalling pathway may provide a useful strategy for treatment of colon cancer.     

Serine peptidase inhibitor Kazal type I (SPINK1) promotes BRL‐3A cell proliferation via p38, ERK,and JNK pathways

Serine peptidase inhibitor Kazal type I (SPINK1) has the similar spatial structure as epidermal growth factor (EGF); EGF can interact with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) to promote proliferation in different cell types. However, whether SPINK1 can interact with EGFR and further regulate the proliferation of hepatocytes in liver regeneration remains largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the role of SPINK1 in a rat liver hepatocyte line of BRL‐3A in vitro. The results showed the upregulation of endogenous Spink1 (gene addition) significantly increased not only the cell viability, cell numbers in S and G₂/M phase, but also upregulated the genes/proteins expression related to cell proliferation and anti‐apoptosis in BRL‐3A. In contrast, the cell number in G₁ phase and the expression of pro‐apoptosis‐related genes/proteins were significantly decreased. The similar results were observed when the cells were treated with exogenous rat recombinant SPINK1. Immunoblotting suggested SPINK1 can interact with EGFR. By Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software, the SPINK1 signalling pathway was built; the predicted read outs were validated by qRT‐PCR and western blot; and the results showed that p38, ERK, and JNK pathways‐related genes/proteins were involved in the cell proliferation upon the treatment of endogenous Spink1 and exogenous SPINK1. Collectively, SPINK1 can associate with EGFR to promote the expression of cell proliferation‐related and anti‐apoptosis‐related genes/proteins; inhibit the expression of pro‐apoptosis‐related genes/proteins via p38, ERK, and JNK pathways; and consequently promote the proliferation of BRL‐3A cells. For the first time, we demonstrated that SPINK1 can associate with EGFR to promote the proliferation of BRL‐3A cells via p38, ERK, and JNK pathways. This work has direct implications on the underlying mechanism of SPINK1 in regulating hepatocytes proliferation in vivo and liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy.     

Elevated PRC1 in gastric carcinoma exerts oncogenic function and is targeted by piperlongumine in a p53‐dependent manner

Gastric carcinoma is one of the most common malignancies worldwide and the second most frequent cause of cancer‐related death in China. Protein regulator of cytokinesis 1 (PRC1) is involved in cytokinesis and plays key roles in microtubule organization in eukaryotes. This study was aimed to analyse the expression and to investigate the functional role of PRC1 in gastric tumorigenesis. The expression of PRC1 was evaluated by qRT‐PCR, Western blot and immunohistochemistry. The biological function of PRC1 was determined by CCK‐8 proliferation assays, monolayer colony formation, xenografted nude mice and cell invasion assays by shRNA‐mediated knockdown in AGS and HGC27 cells. The regulation of PRC1 expression by piperlongumine was also investigated using dual‐luciferase reporter assay and ChIP‐qPCR analysis. PRC1 was up‐regulated in primary gastric cancers. Overexpression of PRC1 in gastric cancers was associated with poor disease‐specific survival and overall survival. PRC1 knockdown in AGS and HGC27 cell lines suppressed proliferation, reduced monolayer colony formation, inhibited cell invasion and migration ability and induced cell‐cycle arrest and apoptosis. Inhibition of PRC1 also suppressed tumour growth in vivo. We finally confirmed that PRC1 is a novel downstream target of piperlongumine in gastric cancer. Our findings supported the oncogenic role of PRC1 in gastric carcinogenesis. PRC1 might serve as a prognostic biomarker and potential therapeutic target for gastric carcinoma.     

Can EGFR be a therapeutic target in breast cancer?

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is highly expressed in certain cancer types and is involved in regulating the biological characteristics of cancer progression, including proliferation, metastasis, and drug resistance. Various medicines targeting EGFR have been developed and approved for several cancer types, such as lung and colon cancer. To date, however, EGFR inhibitors have not achieved satisfactory clinical results in breast cancer, which continues to be the most serious malignant tumor type in females. Therefore, clarifying the underlying mechanisms related to the ineffectiveness of EGFR inhibitors in breast cancer and developing new EGFR-targeted strategies (e.g., combination therapy) remain critical challenges. Various studies have demonstrated aberrant expression and maintenance of EGFR levels in breast cancer. In this review, we summarize the regulatory mechanisms underlying EGFR protein expression in breast cancer cells, including EGFR mutations, amplification, endocytic dysfunction, recycling acceleration, and degradation disorders. We also discuss potential therapeutic strategies that act directly or indirectly on EGFR, including reducing EGFR protein expression, treating the target protein to mediate precise clearance, and inhibiting non-EGFR signaling pathways. This review should provide new therapeutic perspectives for breast cancer patients with high EGFR expression.     

EGFR is dispensable for c-Met-mediated proliferation and survival activities in mouse adult liver oval cells

Liver progenitor cells rise as potential critical players in hepatic regeneration but also carcinogenesis. It is therefore mandatory to define the signals controlling their activation and expansion. Recently, by using a novel in vitro model of oval cell lines expressing a mutant tyrosine kinase-inactive form of c-Met we demonstrated that autocrine c-Met signalling plays an essential role in promoting oval cell survival. Here, we investigated the significance of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signalling in oval cell proliferation and survival, as well as a potential functional crosstalk between the c-Met and the EGFR pathways. We found an autocrine activation of the EGFR-triggered pathway in Met^flx/flx and Met^−/− oval cells as judged by constitutive expression of the EGFR ligands, transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF-α) and heparin-binding EGF like growth factor (HB-EGF), and activation of EGFR. On the other hand, treatment with AG1478, a specific inhibitor of EGFR, effectively blocked endogenous and EGF-induced proliferation, while increased serum withdrawal and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β)-induced apoptosis. These results suggest that constitutively activated EGFR might promote oval cell proliferation and survival. We found that hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) does not transactivate EGFR nor EGF transactivates c-Met. Furthermore, treatment with AG1478 or EGFR gene silencing did not interfere with HGF-mediated activation of target signals, such as protein kinase B (AKT/PKB), and extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK 1/2), nor did it have any effect on HGF-induced proliferative and antiapoptotic activities in Met^flx/flx cells, showing that HGF does not require EGFR activation to mediate such responses. EGF induced proliferation and survival equally in Met^flx/flx and Met^−/− oval cells, proving that EGFR signalling does not depend on c-Met tyrosine kinase activity. Together, our results provide strong evidence that in normal, untransformed oval cells, c-Met and EGFR represent critical molecular players to control proliferation and survival that function independent of one another.